それは奇妙に思えます。たとえば、空が青いと言うと、「あなたが言ったことの私の個人的な解釈で、「空は水でいっぱいだ」ということで応答します。空は青い"。著者が言おうとしていることについての自分の理解は、著者をどうにかして勝者のものに勝つことができると本当に信じていますか？
That seems weird. Like, if I tell you that the sky is blue, responding with "my personal interpretation of what you just said is that 'the sky is full of water'" doesn't change the fact that I'm trying to convey the information "the sky is blue". Do people really believe that their own understanding of what the author is trying to say can somehow trump the author's?