An American Dilemma
Myrdal believed he saw a vicious cycle in which whites oppressed blacks, leading to poor standards of education, health, morality, etc. among blacks that was then used as justification for prejudice and discrimination. The way out of this cycle, he argued, was to either reduce white prejudice, which would improve the circumstances of blacks, or to improve the circumstances of blacks, which would then reduce the reasons for white prejudice. Myrdal called this process the "principle of cumulation". In "Black-White Relations: The American Dilemma", economist Junfu Zhang gives this description of Myrdal's work:
Myrdal, writing before the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, alleged that northern whites were generally ignorant of the situation facing Negro citizens, and noted that "to get publicity is of the highest strategic importance to the Negro people". Given the press's pivotal role in the movement, this proved to be strikingly prescient. At the center of Myrdal's work in "An American Dilemma" was his postulate that political and social interaction in the United States is shaped by an "American Creed". This creed emphasizes the ideals of individualism, civil liberties, and equality of opportunity. Myrdal claims that it is the "American Creed" that keeps the diverse melting pot of the United States together. It is the common belief in this creed that endows all people—whites, blacks, rich, poor, male, female, and immigrants alike—with a common cause and allows them to co-exist as one nation. The United States Supreme Court’s decision to cite to Myrdal’s book exposed it to ridicule in the South. For example, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Florida declared that, in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, “the Supreme Court abandoned the Constitution, precedent and common sense and fortified its decision solely with the writings of Gunner Myrdal, a Scandinavian sociologist. What he knew about constitutional law we are not told nor have we been able to learn.” American Marxist historian Herbert Aptheker wrote a booklet titled "The Negro People in America: A Critique of Gunnar Myrdal’s “An American Dilemma”" arguing the work contained "numerous and serious misstatements of fact" and was "based upon a fallacious philosophic concept." In a 1944 review, political scientist Harold F. Gosnell described Myrdal's book as "an outstanding social science treatise, brilliant, stimulating, and provocative."
Reception
It was enormously influential in how racial issues were viewed in the United States, and it was cited in the landmark "Brown v. Board of Education" case "in general".