 I always thought that when it comes to water cooling, more is automatically better. That is to say if one radiator is not enough, you can just add another one or another two to get better performance. Well, it seems that I've been water cooling incorrectly for years. Or at least that's what Corsair leads me to believe. Like, what? How could that possibly be that adding more radiators wouldn't help? I just can't believe that to find out exactly what they said to me, you're gonna have to sit through this segue to... Xsplit makes powerful streaming PC apps for streamers, vloggers, and more. Check out their Vcam software to change your background without a green screen. Learn more at the end of the video. 🎵Music🎵 When we showed our concept cooling system for our Hack Pro 2019 with a front intake radiator and a rear exhaust radiator, Corsair emailed me to say that according to their simulation data, that second radiator would be at best pointless and could even make our cooling worse because it adds more airflow resistance and because, I mean, if you think about it, the second radiator can't cool water with hot air from inside the case. I ignored them. And then when we showed off Jake's custom Minecraft server that used not one, not two, but three thick alpha cool radiators stacked against each other with layers of Noctua 80 millimeter fans in between, Corsair reached out again to admonish me for water cooling wrong. The problem is, like, guys, my experience tells me that stacking radiators works great. Or, at least, I thought it did. I've never done a side-by-side comparison. It makes sense, though, like, you would think that doubling the surface area radiating heat away from the system must lead to, if not double, then at least significantly better performance, but, guys, turns out it's not that simple. In order to dissipate heat in a water cooling system, there needs to be a difference in temperature across the materials in your heat exchanger. In this case, that's the ambient air, which is cool, and the water, which is warm from your components. And then this is really important, the greater that difference in temperature, the more heat can be exchanged. And the thing is, because modern radiators are so efficient, says Corsair, if the water temperature is, let's say, 40 degrees under load, we can bet that the air coming out of that rad is gonna be just below that, meaning that by the time it picks up some extra heat from air-cooled components, like motherboard VRMs, it's not gonna have any heat capacity left to pull heat from a second radiator that it's going through. That kind of makes sense. But I wasn't ready to give up yet. So to determine once and for all if adding a second rad is useless, we decided to build a test rig, so Colin got to work and pieced together, where is it? Ah, there it is, that little tower sporting an RTX 2080 Ti and Intel's 9900KS, or as I like to call it, my little furnace. Together, this pair can draw a little over 400 watts of power under a synthetic load, and all that heat is going right into our water. BT dubs, guys, if you like water loops, get subscribed. We're planning to water cool a gaming chair, and you're not gonna want to miss that if you get warm in the summer. So our first test is to establish a baseline with a single 240 millimeter rad up front, pulling air in to be exhausted out of the top of the case with a second pair of matching fans. The system stays cool enough not to thermal throttle, but it's also obvious that our radiator is up against its limit. So according to my common-sense PC building wisdom, this system would have looked like a perfect candidate for just throwing another radiator at the problem. With that out of the way, then, it's time to plumb up our second rad in series and put it in the top of the case with more or less the same fan configuration. Now, we did end up having some RAM clearance issues requiring us to put the fans on top of the case, but that should not negatively impact our data. The important thing is that the radiator is still inside the case, exposed to all the other heat sources that are in there. Now, for the moment of truth. Our stress test was designed to hit both the CPU and graphics card with FurMark while logging all the pertinent data using hardware info. That means not just temperatures, but also power consumption and clock speeds. In each scenario, the system was allowed to hit a steady state, and then we stopped the loads and let the system cool back down to our idle temperatures. Let's look at the numbers. Hopping right into the GPU temps, the red line is with the single rad, and the green line is with our dual rad setup. Not only did our dual rad setup take way longer to reach its max temperature, it also ran way cooler. About 20 degrees cooler, in fact. So that's it, Corsair. Your myth is busted. End of video. I'm out. Just kidding. We did our due diligence and checked the CPU as well to make sure that both loops were actually experiencing the same thermal load. And they were. Both scenarios had the CPU clock between 4.5 and 4.6, nothing out of the ordinary there, and our power usage looked nearly identical as well. So then, why didn't our results match Corsair's claims? To be clear, guys, I'm not saying that their CFD analysis or their real-world testing is wrong, or that what they said doesn't make sense. And let's remember as well, they didn't actually critique this exact build. All I'm trying to say is that this kind of simulation rarely translates perfectly to the real world. And also, that you should go to LTTstore.com. Okay, no, that was an aside. So our working theory is that the openings in the case at both the back and the bottom allowed for some fresh ambient air to come in and mix with the hot air before being pulled up through the second rad. Now, if we had sealed off every potential air leak, it's possible we would have seen something closer to Corsair simulation. But as far as we can tell, that's just not a true representation of the real world. I mean, nobody would do that. Another thing to consider is that every system is a little different. Fan orientations, fan speeds, radiator placement, pump flow rates, case designs, all these things will affect how a cooling system works. As we've seen with the Minecraft server and the Hack Pro, sometimes the truth of the matter is, you've just got to work with the space you've got. And we also did another sanity check. We had Jake remove one of his stacked radiators, which ended up resulting in a five degree increase in temps under load. That's another proverbial nail in this coffin. Now, I'm sure that in some rare cases, it could actually be a negligible or bad thing to add a second radiator, but a blanket statement saying that stacking rads is bad just isn't even nearly true. And you should really look at your particular use case and evaluate for yourself if you can. So the moral of the story here is take everything with a grain of salt, including what I'm saying right now. Do your own research and do a little benchmarking on your phone. On your phone? On your own. It's easy, free, fun, and can tell you loads about how to make your system work best for you. So that's it. If you guys want to check out some more benchmark related videos, why not take a look at the video we did last year about finding out if your gaming rig is bottlenecked. We're going to have that linked in the end screen for you. Thanks to Xsplit for sponsoring today's video. With Xsplit Vcam, you can remove, replace, and blur your background without a green screen. It works with any webcam and there's no need for complicated lighting setups. It uses AI to automatically tell the difference between you and the background, and you can customize the background to be anything you want. Vcam works with other Xsplit broadcast tools, but also Slack, Hangout, Skype, and more. And they've got 24-7 support and lifetime updates, and you can check it out at the link in the video description. Wow, I already kind of threw to another video, so...