Can he accept money in return for being beaten and humiliated in front of people?
Question

                I was given some money as the result of my being beaten with shoes in front of a large number of people. This money was decided by a traditional council. What is the ruling on this money? Can I give some of it in charity to the poor and needy? Do I have the right to spend some of this money on my living expenses?.
Praise be to Allah.
    Firstly: 

    There is nothing wrong with referring for judgement to those 
    traditional councils with which people deal to resolve conflicts and 
    disputes, so long as the one who is passing judgement has knowledge of 
    sharee’ah so that he can judge between people in accordance with that which 
    Allaah revealed, and not according to whims and desires or traditions and 
    customs, many of which go against the rulings of Allaah. If they rule in 
    accordance with the rulings of Allaah, this is what is desirable, but if 
    they rule in ways that go against the rulings of Allaah, there is no point 
    in their rulings, and it is a false ruling and must be rejected. Allaah says 
    (interpretation of the meaning): 

    “Do they then seek the judgement of (the days of) 
    Ignorance? And who is better in judgement than Allaah for a people who have 
    firm Faith”

    [al-Maa’idah 5:50]

    Secondly: 

    The scholars differed concerning the ruling on slapping, 
    punching, etc, and whether qisaas or ta’zeer punishment is required in such 
    cases. The majority are of the view that ta’zeer is required but there is no 
    qisaas. The Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them all) and the prominent 
    scholars were of the view that qisaas is required. 

    Imam al-Bukhaari (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in 
    Kitaab al-Diyaat, under the chapter heading “If a group of people have 
    killed or injured one man, do all of them have to pay the diyah or be 
    punished with the law of qisaas?” 

    Abu Bakr, Ibn al-Zubayr, ‘Ali and Suwayd ibn Muqarrin ruled 
    that qisaas was required in a case of slapping. ‘Umar ruled that qisaas was 
    required in a case of striking with a stick. ‘Ali ruled that qisaas was 
    required in a case of three lashes with a whip. And Shurayh ruled that 
    qisaas was required for a case of lashes and scratches, i.e., wounds. End 
    quote  

    This view is the correct one. Those who narrated that there 
    was consensus on the opposite view were wrong, rather if anyone were to 
    claim that there was consensus among the Sahaabah on this ruling, they would 
    not be far off the mark. 

    Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:  

    The people differed concerning this issue – which is qisaas 
    in cases of slapping, beating and other things in which the person who is 
    retaliating cannot do the same to his opponent as was done to him in all 
    aspects – is qisaas justified in this case, or should a punishment of 
    another type be meted out, which is ta’zeer? There are two views: 

    The more correct view is that qisaas is prescribed in such 
    cases. This is the view of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, as was proven from 
    them and narrated from them by Ahmad and Abu Ishaaq al-Jawzjaani in 
    al-Mutarjim. This was stated by Imam Ahmad, and our Shaykh (may Allaah 
    have mercy on him) – i.e., Ibn Taymiyah – said: It is the view of the 
    majority of the salaf. 

    The second view is that qisaas is not prescribed in such 
    cases. This is the view narrated from al-Shaafa’i, Maalik and Abu Haneefah, 
    and it is the view of the later followers of Imam Ahmad, to such an extent 
    that some of them narrated that there was consensus on the ruling that there 
    is no qisaas in this case! 

    But that is not the case, rather the reports that the 
    consensus of the Sahaabah was that qisaas is prescribed are more likely to 
    be true than the reports which say that there was consensus that it is not 
    prescribed. It is proven from the Rightly-Guided Caliphs and no opposition 
    to that is known. 

    Both views are based on the fact that Allaah has enjoined 
    justice in that, so it remains to be seen which of the two options is 
    closest to justice? 

    Those who say that qisaas is not required say that 
    retaliating in like manner is not possible in this case, so it is as if 
    justice requires using another form of punishment, which is ta’zeer. Qisaas 
    can only be by retaliating in like manner, hence it is not required in the 
    case of wounding or cutting, unless it is possible to do the same things. 
    When it is not possible to retaliate in kind with regard to wounding or 
    cutting, then we have to resort to the diyah idea, and the same applies to 
    slapping and the like, where we have to resort to ta’zeer if retaliating in 
    like manner is not possible.  

    Those who say that qisaas is permissible say: Qisaas in such 
    cases is closer to Qur’aan and Sunnah and qiyaas (analogy) and justice than 
    ta’zeer. As for Qur’aan, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):  
    “The recompense for an evil is an evil like thereof” [al-Shoora 42:40] 
    and “Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you 
    transgress likewise against him” [al-Baqarah 2:194]. 

    It is well-known that responding in kind is required 
    according as much as possible, so a slap is more similar to a slap than 
    ta’zeer, and a blow is more similar to a blow than ta’zeer, because the 
    ta’zeer may be a blow in a different place, that does not resemble the 
    original blow in type or location, or extent. So you are trying to avoid the 
    unavoidable difference between two slaps and you ended up with a greater 
    difference (by choosing ta’zeer) without any evidence from texts or analogy. 
     

    They said: As for the Sunnah [Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have 
    mercy on him) quoted a number of ahaadeeth which prove that qisaas is 
    allowed in such cases]. Then he said: If there was no evidence concerning 
    this matter except the practice of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, that would be 
    sufficient evidence. 

    Haashiyat Ibn al-Qayyim ‘ala Tahdheeb Sunan Abi Dawood 
    (7/336, 337). See also: al-Fataawa al-Kubra (3/402). 

    Thirdly: 

    Once it is proven that qisaas is prescribed for the beating 
    you received from the other party, you have the option of forgiving him and 
    letting him off if you think that he regrets it and has prayed to Allaah for 
    forgiveness and has apologized and set himself straight. Or you may 
    retaliate (qisaas) by doing the same as was done to you without overstepping 
    the mark or wronging him. Or you may forego your right to qisaas in return 
    for some material compensation as determined by the shar’i judge. 

    If you take retaliation by doing to him the same as he did to 
    you, then it is not permissible for you to take any money in return for the 
    humiliation, because you have taken your right. By the same token, any 
    compensation that is awarded to you is in return for the beating, not the 
    humiliation, because humiliation is an intangible harm, and it is not 
    permissible to take material compensation for this kind of harm. The 
    majority of scholars are agreed on this point. 

    It says in a report of the Islamic Fiqh Council (no. 109 
    (3/12): 

    The kind of harm for which it is permissible to receive 
    compensation is actual material harm … it does not include intangible harm. 
     

    It says in al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah (13/40), under 
    the heading “Compensation for intangible harm”: 

    We have not found any of the fuqaha’ who discussed this, 
    rather it is a modern idea. We do not find in the books of fiqh any faqeeh 
    who spoke of financial compensation for any kind of intangible harm. End 
    quote. 

    In conclusion: What you are entitled to is qisaas, or letting 
    him off completely – which is the best choice if it seems that he has mended 
    his ways or regretted it – or accepting compensation in return for having 
    been beaten. If you avail yourself of the right to qisaas, then you have no 
    right after that to any money. But if you are going to take your rights in 
    the form of money only – which is what seems to be the case from your 
    question – then there is nothing wrong with you making use of it for 
    yourself or giving it in charity. 

    And Allaah knows best.