What is the thing that came from Paradise and is found in the Ka’bah?
Question

                What is the thing that came from Paradise and is found in the Ka’bah?.
Praise be to Allah.We do not know of anything 
    in the Ka’bah that it says in the Sunnah came from Paradise, apart from two 
    things. 
1-
The Black Stone. It was 
    narrated in a hadeeth that Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) 
    said: The Messenger of Allaah  (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon 
    him) said: “The Black Stone came down from Paradise and it was whiter than 
    milk, but the sins of the sons of Adam turned it black.” Narrated by 
    al-Tirmidhi (877). 
Al-Tirmidhi said: It is a 
    saheeh hasan hadeeth. It was classed as saheeh by Ibn Khuzaymah (4/219) and 
    by al-Diya’ al-Maqdisi in al-Mukhtaarah (10/260). It was classed as 
    hasan by Ibn al-Qattaan in Bayaan al-Wahm wa’l-Ayhaam (5/732), 
    al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Baari (3/540) and al-Albaani in 
    al-Silsilah al-Saheehah (2618). 
It was also narrated from 
    Ibn ‘Abbaas, Ibn ‘Amr and others, see Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah 
    (4/35); and from Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him) in Musnad Ahmad 
    (3/277). 
See also the answers to 
    question no. 1902, 
    21402 and 
    45643. 
2-
Maqaam Ibraaheem (the 
    Station of Ibraaheem). That was narrated in the hadeeth of ‘Abd-Allaah ibn 
    ‘Amr (may Allaah be pleased with him) who said: I heard the Messenger of 
    Allaah  (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “The Rukn and 
    the Maqaam are two of the rubies of Paradise; Allaah has extinguished their 
    light, and if He did not extinguish their light, they would have illuminated 
    that which is between the east and the west.” 
It was narrated via 
    Musaafi’ ibn Shaybah al-Hujabi from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas. 
It was narrated from 
    Musaafi’ by a number of narrators via two isnaads: 

    (a)In a mawqoof report from 
    ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas
This is how it was narrated 
    by al-Zuhri and Shu’bah, as stated by Abu Haatim in al-‘Ilal (1/300), 
    without narrating the isnaads. 

    (b)In a marfoo’ report from the 
    Prophet  (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
It was narrated by Raja’ 
    Abu Yahya from Musaafi’, in Musnad Ahmad (2/213), Sunan 
    al-Tirmidhi (878), Saheeh Ibn Khuzaymah (4/219), Saheeh Ibn 
    Hibbaan (9/24) and Mustadrak al-Haakim (1/627). 
Raja’ is the son of Subayh 
    al-Harashi, of whom Ibn Ma’een said: (He is) weak. Abu Haatim said: he is 
    not strong. Ibn Khuzaymah said: I did not know anything good or bad about 
    this Abu Raja’, and I do not take the reports of someone like him as 
    evidence. 
He was regarded as thiqah 
    (trustworthy) by Imam al-Bukhaari and Ibn Hibbaan, and Shaykh Ahmad Shaakir 
    followed their opinion in Tahqeeq al-Musnad.
See: Tahdheeb 
    al-Tahdheeb (3/268). 
It was also narrated in a 
    marfoo’ report by: Shabeeb ibn Sa’eed al-Habati and Ayyoob ibn Suwayd, from 
    Yoonus ibn Yazeed, from al-Zuhri, from Musaafi’. The former is narrated by 
    al-Bayhaqi in al-Sunan al-Kubra (5/75) and the latter is narrated by 
    Ibn Khuzaymah in his Saheeh (4/219) and by al-Haakim in 
    al-Mustadrak (1/626), and via him by al-Bayhaqi in al-Sunan al-Kubra 
    (5/75). This isnaad is saheeh, because Shabeeb ibn Sa’eed is thiqah as 
    classified by Ibn al-Madeeni. 
See his biography in 
    Tareekh Baghdaad (11/329) and Tareekh al-Islam (28/381). 
It was classed as saheeh by 
    al-Nawawi in al-Majmoo’ (8/36), where he said: It is saheeh according 
    to the conditions of Muslim; and by Ibn Taymiyah in al-Manaasik min Sharh 
    al-‘Umdah (2/434) 
Al-Albaani said in his 
    commentary on Saheeh Ibn Khuzaymah (2731): its isnaad is hasan li 
    ghayrihi (hasan because of corroborating evidence), because Ayyoob ibn 
    Suwayd has a bad memory, but it was also narrated by Shabeeb ibn Sa’eed 
    al-Habati, according to al-Bayhaqi, who is thiqah, from the report of his 
    son Ahmad from him, so its isnaad is saheeh. End quote. 
Shu’ayb al-Arna’oot said 
    concerning him in his commentary on Ibn Hibbaan (3710): A hadeeth which is 
    hasan li ghayrihi. It was also classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh 
    al-Tirmidhi (878). 
It was classed as saheeh by 
    Shaykh Ahmad Shaakir (may Allaah have mercy on him) in his commentary on 
    al-Musnad (7000), and he discussed its isnaad at length. 
The editors of Imam Ahmad’s
    Musnad favoured the view that the more correct opinion is that the 
    isnaad stops at ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr (may Allaah be pleased with him), and 
    that the marfoo’ isnaad (i.e. the isnaad that goes back to the Prophet  
    (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)) is da’eef (weak). It seems that 
    al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on him) in Fath al-Baari 
    (3/540) was also inclined towards this view. 
And Allaah knows best.