Typical examples are Bulgarian ( Simov et al. , 2005 ; Simov and Osenova , 2003 ) , Chinese ( Chen et al. , 2003 ) , Danish ( Kromann , 2003 ) , and Swedish ( Nilsson et al. , 2005 ) .
sinica treebank design criteria representational issues and implementation
K Chen C Luo M Chang F Chen C Chen C Huang Z Gao
If we start by considering languages with a labeled attachment score of 85 % or higher , they are characterized by high precision and recall for root nodes , typically 95/90 , and by a graceful degradation of attachment score as arcs grow longer , typically 95 -- 90 -- 85 , for arcs of length 1 , 2 and 3 -- 6 . Typical examples are Bulgarian ( Simov et al. , 2005 ; Simov and Osenova , 2003 ) , Chinese ( Chen et al. , 2003 ) , Danish ( Kromann , 2003 ) , and Swedish ( Nilsson et al. , 2005 ) . Japanese ( Kawata and Bartels , 2000 ) , despite a very high accuracy , is different in that attachment score drops from 98 % to 85 % , as we go from length 1 to 2 , which may have something to do with the data consisting of transcribed speech with very short utterances .
Typical examples are Bulgarian ( Simov et al. , 2005 ; Simov and Osenova , 2003 ) , Chinese ( @@CITATION ) , Danish ( Kromann , 2003 ) , and Swedish ( Nilsson et al. , 2005 ) .