A more flexible approach is used by Reiter and Sripada ( 2002 ) , where users can specify boundary values for attributes like rainfall , specifying , for example , rain counts as moderate above 7 mm/h , as heavy above 20 mm/h , and so on .
should corpora texts be gold standards for nlg
Ehud Reiter Somayajulu Sripada
FOG does not appear to have generic rules governing the use of gradable notions : it does not compute the meaning of a vague term based on the context , but uses fixed boundary values instead . A more flexible approach is used by Reiter and Sripada ( 2002 ) , where users can specify boundary values for attributes like rainfall , specifying , for example , rain counts as moderate above 7 mm/h , as heavy above 20 mm/h , and so on . A third approach was implemented in Dial Your Disc ( DYD ) , where the extension of a gradable adjective like famous was computed rather than specified by hand ( van Deemter and Odijk 1997 ) .
A more flexible approach is used by @@CITATION , where users can specify boundary values for attributes like rainfall , specifying , for example , rain counts as moderate above 7 mm/h , as heavy above 20 mm/h , and so on .