Tuttavia, la Corte ritiene eccessivi i ritardi nell’esame delle istanze del ricorrente circa la legalità della propria detenzione e quindi conclude, all’unanimità, per la violazione dell’Articolo 5 § 4. ###>However, it noted that there had been excessive delays in the examination of his applications for a review of the lawfulness of his detention and therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4.