  Software model checkers based on under-approximations and SMT solvers are
very successful at verifying safety (i.e. reachability) properties. They
combine two key ideas -- (a) "concreteness": a counterexample in an
under-approximation is a counterexample in the original program as well, and
(b) "generalization": a proof of safety of an under-approximation, produced by
an SMT solver, are generalizable to proofs of safety of the original program.
In this paper, we present a combination of "automatic abstraction" with the
under-approximation-driven framework. We explore two iterative approaches for
obtaining and refining abstractions -- "proof based" and "counterexample based"
-- and show how they can be combined into a unified algorithm. To the best of
our knowledge, this is the first application of Proof-Based Abstraction,
primarily used to verify hardware, to Software Verification. We have
implemented a prototype of the framework using Z3, and evaluate it on many
benchmarks from the Software Verification Competition. We show experimentally
that our combination is quite effective on hard instances.

Logic in Computer Science;Programming Languages