  This paper introduces new notions of asymptotic proofs,
PT(polynomial-time)-extensions, PTM(polynomial-time Turing
machine)-omega-consistency, etc. on formal theories of arithmetic including PA
(Peano Arithmetic). This paper shows that P not= NP (more generally, any
super-polynomial-time lower bound in PSPACE) is unprovable in a
PTM-omega-consistent theory T, where T is a consistent PT-extension of PA. This
result gives a unified view to the existing two major negative results on
proving P not= NP, Natural Proofs and relativizable proofs, through the two
manners of characterization of PTM-omega-consistency. We also show that the
PTM-omega-consistency of T cannot be proven in any PTM-omega-consistent theory
S, where S is a consistent PT-extension of T.

Computational Complexity;Logic in Computer Science