  The Universal Dependencies (UD) and Universal Morphology (UniMorph) projects
each present schemata for annotating the morphosyntactic details of language.
Each project also provides corpora of annotated text in many languages - UD at
the token level and UniMorph at the type level. As each corpus is built by
different annotators, language-specific decisions hinder the goal of universal
schemata. With compatibility of tags, each project's annotations could be used
to validate the other's. Additionally, the availability of both type- and
token-level resources would be a boon to tasks such as parsing and homograph
disambiguation. To ease this interoperability, we present a deterministic
mapping from Universal Dependencies v2 features into the UniMorph schema. We
validate our approach by lookup in the UniMorph corpora and find a
macro-average of 64.13% recall. We also note incompatibilities due to paucity
of data on either side. Finally, we present a critical evaluation of the
foundations, strengths, and weaknesses of the two annotation projects.

Computation and Language