  Circumplanetary disks can be found around forming giant planets, regardless
of whether core accretion or gravitational instability built the planet. We
carried out state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations of the circumplanetary
disks for both formation scenarios, using as similar initial conditions as
possible to unveil possible intrinsic differences in the circumplanetary disk
mass and temperature between the two formation mechanisms. We found that the
circumplanetary disks mass linearly scales with the circumstellar disk mass.
Therefore, in an equally massive protoplanetary disk, the circumplanetary disks
formed in the disk instability model can be only a factor of eight more massive
than their core-accretion counterparts. On the other hand, the bulk
circumplanetary disk temperature differs by more than an order of magnitude
between the two cases. The subdisks around planets formed by gravitational
instability have a characteristic temperature below 100 K, while the core
accretion circumplanetary disks are hot, with temperatures even greater than
1000 K when embedded in massive, optically thick protoplanetary disks. We
explain how this difference can be understood as the natural result of the
different formation mechanisms. We argue that the different temperatures should
persist up to the point when a full-fledged gas giant forms via disk
instability, hence our result provides a convenient criteria for observations
to distinguish between the two main formation scenarios by measuring the bulk
temperature in the planet vicinity.

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics