Yeah, and that's an almost impossible question to answer because it is so complex. There are so many contributing factors. But I actually don't think it's a totally necessary to do that. You actually can just say, here are the behaviors that we tolerate. Here are the ones that we don't tolerate. And then you lay out a series of simple consequences. And so what we're seeing in El Salvador, which, of course, is ongoing, it's fraught with potential problems. But what they did is essentially lock up the 1% of the El salvadoran population that were the violent, committed gang members and drug runners, and they reduced the murder rate by more than 90%. It used to be the most dangerous country in the world, highest murder rate. Now it's per capita, depending on how you measure it, one of the safest countries in the hemisphere. The lesson is that it is actually a vanishingly small number of people that commit the large plurality or majority of crimes. And so it's not that you have to have a kind of soul searching and endless navel gazing and philosophizing. It's simply to say, you know, people who are a direct threat to others that commit violent crimes, that maybe have 2030, 4100 convictions in their criminal history, you know, cannot participate in society without limits. And it's something that people have been scared to talk about. But I think that that is ending because when people start to feel a sense of danger in their daily lives, theyre going to start to break through some of those taboos and to say, hey, wait a minute. Yeah. The letting people out of jail who are violent criminals doesnt seem to be working. And I think were there even in Seattle, they elected a republican city attorney. They elected a moderate city council, a moderate mayor. And the big cities, especially the west coast cities, are waking up to this citizen rage. These are the most prosperous cities in the history of the world, but they can't keep the streets clean. They can't keep people safe.