I gotta say, the media coverage of this stuff is just awful. The media were cheering this stuff on. They were simultaneously making two arguments that conflict with each other. One was these are mostly peaceful protests. First of all, mostly peaceful is the most. It's the most loosely defined, arbitrarily applied term in history. OJ Simpson was mostly peaceful that night. OJ Simpson was mostly peaceful that night for like, an hour 15, he was really not peaceful. But for the other hours, between sunset and sunrise, he was unbelievably peaceful. Like, I've never heard this term before, where a protest turns into a vast riot wrecking all of Melrose, and everybody's like, well, it was mostly peaceful. What is that? What is that? That's true. So how about this? How about you either say that the protesters and the looters are two different groups of people and we treat them differently. If you're protesting, that's First Amendment activity. The minute you shatter a store window, you go to jail, right? That's the way this should run.