And so this caused all sorts of chaos. Predictably, you have donors dropping out, you have alumni furious. And then a little birdie sent another reporter and me a document showing that actually Claudine gay, great scholar of Harvard, had plagiarized dozens of passages in her PhD thesis. And so in this context of this big fight, you get a document like this, and you say, this actually reveals the heart of this conflict. And so, published, it obviously causes a huge firestorm. But the question is the same. It's to say to Harvard, okay, Dei is the de facto highest principle of the university. Now, that's clear. But your motto for the last 3400 years has been veritas truth. And we put them in a dilemma where they had to choose one. You either choose Dei or you choose truth. Which one are you gonna sacrifice? And I think, as a country, the reason that story drove so much attention is because that's where we are politically. That's where we are on policy. That's where companies find themselves, where are we going? What are our values? And we have this competing set of values. And for me, as someone who. Look, I'm unabashed. I'm a political person. I try to drive political change. I think framing the question clearly so that people really understand what's at stake is just the beginning part of the process of getting sanity back.