Sure. So the 1619 project is something put forward by the New York Times. It's not good history. There are four Pulitzer Prize winning historians who have said, this is not good history. The basic argument is the United States was not founded in 1776 with the principles of the Declaration of Independence. The country was actually founded in 1619 with the importation of african slaves to american shores, because that's when the first african slave arrived in the United States was 1619. So the idea is that the entire history of America is a history of a system that is endemically white supremacist and that all of the Declaration of Independence is basically a lie, that the principles of all men are created equal. That was a lie when it was written, and it's a lie now that the idea that we have rights, that pre exist government, that's a lie. All of these things are lies. The constitution was built in order to enshrine white supremacy, and no evolution has taken place. So they essentially make the argument that from 1619 to 2020 is a continuum. Racism has gone underground a little bit, but it's still there and it's still implicit in all of our systems. So the 1619 project has essays blaming literally everything on racism. So disparities in maternal mortality between black women and white women, which, by the way, exist in Europe and in Canada. That's due to american racism. Traffic patterns in the United States is due to systematic american racism. Every racial disparity is attributable to a system that was rooted in slavery. Now, the traditional notion of America is that America was founded in 1776 and that the story of America is that America did tolerate the great original sin of slavery up until the civil war and then tolerated Jim Crow up until the civil rights movement of the 1960s. And that is a great stain and a blot on America. But the story of America is trying to fulfill the promises of the Declaration of Independence over time, make those promises available to everybody. And this isn't my argument. This is Martin Luther King junior s argument when he talks in the march in Washington about fulfilling the promissory note of the Declaration of Independence. He says, we're here to cash the check, right? You issued us the check and then you didn't let black Americans be Americans. We're here to cash the check. This is the argument Frederick Douglass, the freed slave, makes in 1852. He makes a famous speech before slavery has ended, and he says, July 4 doesn't mean anything to black Americans because we're not included in the bargain. Include us in the bargain. The story of America is the declaration of Independence. Those principles that we should all basically still agree on because they're pretty good principles, free speech, free assembly, all the things you see in the Constitution, that those things brought about greater freedom and prosperity than anything else and helped us overcome the sins that are present in all human societies and were present in the United States in extreme ways as well. But that's the counternarrative, right? The 1619 project says that all that was basically nonsense and that America is just a history of whites keeping blacks down and that no progress has essentially been made. If there is progress, it's mostly a lie. And so every disparity now can be attributed to historic disparities between white and black.