diff --git "a/freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp.c2i.test.jsonl" "b/freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp.c2i.test.jsonl"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp.c2i.test.jsonl"
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-0027c152c40d885a5c1739ca68ddcd30b0555c812a7be0d84e57556505e54f6d", "query": "def draw(self, number): drawn = [] if number >= len(self.contents): return self.contents drawn.extend(self.contents) self.contents = [] else: for i in range(number): drawn.append(", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-42b7b7536815d7c41479457e730829ada4fe262f26672a14e8233f846d200fd7", "text": "Faulty method of the class can expose itself only during function tests. Case when number of balls to draw is higher than number of balls in hat is not tested explicitly, but it can fail function test, as it includes such experiment. - - Depending on the number of balls to draw and number of balls in Hat: Remove the required number of balls randomly selected, from the Hat. If number of balls to draw is higher than the number of balls, return all the balls. Test for the method checks only the first case: The second behavior is not checked explicitly, but it's a part of the second sub-case in the function test. This creates situation where passing method test and failing function test, can suggest to camper that issue lies in the function. Example with faulty method: Error: Adding test to check second behavior of the method would make debugging easier for campers, as it would show more clearly where is the issue. No response n/a No response", "commid": "freeCodeCamp_issue_54507", "tokennum": 198}], "negative_passages": []}
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-008b273577a49ba4a2871b50fd3a1257f0d0f6296de62adbfbd41a8e6046d2e1", "query": "```` - Additional information in the form of a note should be formatted `Note: Rest of note text...` - If multiple notes are needed, then list all of the notes in separate sentences using the format `Notes: First note text. Second note text.`. - Use double quotes where applicable ## Formatting seed code", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-3493c3754f389860ad5986c988281f978a5c5a71a0c790349d33d0f4c00f883a", "text": "I have created this issue so we can come to a final conclusion about the best format of notes when they are to the or sections of a challenge file. Below are all the combinations I have seen scattered throughout the curriculum. There may be others, so please let me know and I will update the list. This only applies if there is a single note. For multiple notes (which in my opinion starts to get unnecessary), see later in this topic. Example 1: Example 2: Example 3: Example 4: Example 5: Example 6: Example 7: Regarding situations where two or more separate notes are , I have seen: Example 1: Example 2: Example 3: If everyone can cast a vote for their preference of both a single note and multiple notes, this will help us in deciding on one way and then we can update the Styling Guide for challenges in the documentation.\nI will cast my vote as I prefer Example 7 for single notes, because it takes up less space and adds one additional space between the word and the content. I like Example 3 for multiple notes, because I like the to be bold.\nI'll vote for number 6 for the single notes and number 3 for multiple notes. I don't really see the need for extra space between and whatever comes after it, a simple space is fine\nAlso to add on, perhaps we can have a background-color for all Note sections as we want users to pay attention to those sections particularly. Something like this: ! Color code used: #C9F8CF\nThis is the style guide contain freeCodeCamp's Brand colors: https://design-style- . We try to deviate as least as possible from this and I'm yet to see a major deviation\nAlso, the note is not the most important thing in the challenge. The actual instruction is. We don't want to highlight anything that is not relative to the instruction. Most of the time, these notes are FYIs.\nI vote for example 6 and example 3, The says to use something in none of the examples for single notes, the output would be the same as example 2, I think - Also, the guide doesn't say anything about multi-notes\n6 and 3.\nI vote for example 6 in single notes and example 3 in multiple notes.\nI think it is settled then.", "commid": "freeCodeCamp_issue_35464", "tokennum": 476}], "negative_passages": []}
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-008b273577a49ba4a2871b50fd3a1257f0d0f6296de62adbfbd41a8e6046d2e1", "query": "```` - Additional information in the form of a note should be formatted `Note: Rest of note text...` - If multiple notes are needed, then list all of the notes in separate sentences using the format `Notes: First note text. Second note text.`. - Use double quotes where applicable ## Formatting seed code", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-39f4a067726eca648831b029ec622589cffc0e4357a267a838a1e3cbbb26159e", "text": "6 and 3. What do you think?\nAgreed, with you all. Thanks. Please proceed with pull requests.\nI would like to work on this. Is there a way to assign my name under the assignee? I am not able to do so\nHi Go ahead with PR. We cannot assign you the issue. It's unfortunately a limitation from GitHub. Feel free to make a PR. We usually allow the first open and valid PR to go in as a fix. Thanks.\nThe suggestion in the PR above says to make a multi-note different from the example - so I did some testing to see the outputs and thought I should share.Note: Rest of note text...` - If multiple notes are needed, then list all of the notes in separate sentences using the format `Notes: First note text. Second note text.`. - Use double quotes where applicable ## Formatting seed code", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-05e979c5221ca67c85f2326430d74be25210a8a1085ef4e6edc186afc63f88d6", "text": "That's a judgement call I think it could be converted. I would hold off on the mult-notes for a little bit - and if you're going to make a PR, it's probably best to try and keep it to maybe one section or so at a time, or maybe a few sections if there's only a couple files changed.\nI have a doubt: in , Is the note section considered multi-note or single note? The note section has more than one sentence. Does it qualify as multi-note then?\nThat one looks like you could probably just put the two sentences together in a single note. Since they are so related. And we aren't sure yet what we want a multi-note to look like.\nI agree if they are related a single paragraph note will be fine. However, if it gets to long it may be more difficult for the user to parse the information, and should then be broken up into individual lines. Any Notes section with more than one sentence should still be described as Notes My opinion on the multi-line notes - we should use markdown bullets. It may put a bit of space between items, but they are much simpler to manage when making changes to the markdown. They automatically insert line breaks after each item and don't require verbose HTML wrapping the text. Visually it also looks like a bulleted list. Spacing between bullets can be modified in CSS if needed. It's also easy to replace the bullet with numbers if the order of the note matters. Note vs Notes should be explicit, Note(s) is only useful if you expect someone to add a second Note and they will forget to update Note to Notes, something we should quickly catch in review with the requirement of multiple reviewers. After some conversation with I agree that it really doesn't make sense to have too many notes in a document - we should work to insert the notes into the curriculum, or provide a place for additional information that may not be directly related to the exercise but provide valuable insights/information/resources.\nI believe the corresponding Guide article for the challenge is the place where extra information is supposed to go, to avoid cluttering up the challenge itself.\nthat may be the case but the way it's conveyed is not great IMO. The only link to the guide article is Get a Hint, something many won't click, especially if it's a fairly simple exercise.", "commid": "freeCodeCamp_issue_35464", "tokennum": 498}], "negative_passages": []}
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-008b273577a49ba4a2871b50fd3a1257f0d0f6296de62adbfbd41a8e6046d2e1", "query": "```` - Additional information in the form of a note should be formatted `Note: Rest of note text...` - If multiple notes are needed, then list all of the notes in separate sentences using the format `Notes: First note text. Second note text.`. - Use double quotes where applicable ## Formatting seed code", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-07b62f07d9058d050747d7d6b1bc4e86c88b73ae6ad61f1d9e8a56d18ab197d6", "text": "I also don't see the guide article at all when I search for the exercise title, something we should look into, unless that is by design.\nI see guide links when searching for a lesson title (none of the links work right now) - perhaps you searched for a lesson where the guide article is still a stub, and they don't show up or something.\nThe search indexes have not been updated in over 12 months, so that could be part of this problem.\nI just remember that Quincy prefers not to have links going to other places when a user is on the challenge. He believes the challenge should stand on its own or rely on previously introduced material as much as possible. We want people to stay on the challenge until they just can not, which is where the Get a Hint or Ask for Help buttons come into play.\nSo the single note structure was to the guide with the PR above. The multinote issue wasn't exactly concluded - do we want to continue the conversation? I'm thinking we can close this, and mods should just keep notes small when we can. And multinotes can just be combined into a single paragraph after a\nI don't know how many multi-notes there actually are, but I say we just combine them like you suggest in the same paragraph. I can create a PR to reflect this. Then, as we come across the multi-notes, we can first figure out if there even needs to be a multi-note and then probably just make it a single paragraph. How does that sound?\nA PR to describe this in the guide? Sure", "commid": "freeCodeCamp_issue_35464", "tokennum": 326}], "negative_passages": []}
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-00e7b0164a26861ae6e1f4cd9c99d997ad38e11ab1738ab90e6aee854b8039b2", "query": "assert(new __helpers.CSSHelp(document).getCSSRules('media')?.[2]?.cssRules?.[0]?.style?.fontSize === '6rem'); ``` Your `.hero-subtitle, .author, .quote, .list-header` selector should have a `font-size` set to `1.8rem`. Your `.hero-subtitle, .author, .quote, .list-title` selector should have a `font-size` set to `1.8rem`. ```js assert(new __helpers.CSSHelp(document).getCSSRules('media')?.[2]?.cssRules?.[1]?.style?.fontSize === '1.8rem');", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-bcd6dcaab088bf825da4110f1d36be2f4f135b69cca6dddecf82fa7abc7b7046", "text": "In [()] step it is written but in the html file there is no selector instead there is selector present. ( In [()] step it is written but in the html file there is no selector instead there is selector present. either change the to or remove the totally from the step to do. No response\nPage File: the seed content doesn't have , and the step after it do include it as well. we should swap with This looks something that can be fixed by \"first time\" code contributors to this repository. Here is the file that you should be looking at to work on a fix: file: Please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our moderators will guide you through this. Sometimes we may get more than one pull requests. We typically accept the most quality contribution, followed by the one that is made first. Happy contributing.\nI would like to work on this issue. Please assign this issue to me .\nWe don't give assignment unless to an old time contributor to the repo. Edit: sorry should have provided more info. There were times when people assigned an issue and didn't commit to it, because of that the guide mentions we don't assign people and seek quality and fast commits. Sorry if my original answer was uninformative. I hope you have a good day and happy coding.", "commid": "freeCodeCamp_issue_46521", "tokennum": 293}], "negative_passages": []}
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-042908f416b75b2b25a62e938a5bf532aaf13f6615c0115b33533a6d1dbdcf2d", "query": "--- The kitchen Kitchen ### --feedback--", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-99346b1228c2e61a23d92963736ac346f651b6b95800068881f4d1eb5df5bc64", "text": "Description and question refers to the Here's the main office area. And over there, let me show you, that's the conference room. text. However the audio mentions let me show you in context of showing to the desk. n/a Audio used in task should match the description context. Or the other way around. No response n/a No response\nYes, this is a problem. None of the answers are correct. Here's how I'd fix it: change the option \"the conference room\" to \"the desk\". This should solve the problem. We could also: simplify the question to \"What is Maria directing attention to?\" simplify the example to \"Here's the main office area. Let me show you to the conference room.\"\nI am fine with the suggestion. You could use as the example. What do you think\nAgreed I'm going to add the help wanted label.", "commid": "freeCodeCamp_issue_52708", "tokennum": 190}], "negative_passages": []}
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-056f1945a19c5797751c72f5037ec1cc29ae53a90663fcb1f1b395ee2a9c6e62", "query": "\"invalid-protocol\": \"URL must start with http or https\", \"url-not-image\": \"URL must link directly to an image file\", \"use-valid-url\": \"Please use a valid URL\" }, \"certification\": { \"certifies\": \"This certifies that\", \"completed\": \"has successfully completed the freeCodeCamp.org\", \"developer\": \"Developer Certification, representing approximately\", \"executive\": \"Executive Director, freeCodeCamp.org\", \"verify\": \"Verify this certification at {{certURL}}\", \"issued\": \"Issued\" } }", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-9d27e28b6b11322ffffb0f46b75f04ed33aa399425d47feda2dd65c299432fae", "text": "The certification files () have been uploaded to Crowdin for translation. However, the React Component itself does not use the translation helper for the text within the certification (such as ). The component and files should be updated to allow this.", "commid": "freeCodeCamp_issue_40916", "tokennum": 49}], "negative_passages": []}
+{"query_id": "q-en-freeCodeCamp-05ea99031872297fce837c5d6b5152e5c903265eef44b6e4942f3799d734f983", "query": "## Instructions Modify the myApp.js
file to log \"Hello World\" to the console. ## Tests", "positive_passages": [{"docid": "doc-en-freeCodeCamp-e8fbe3a4067c30478ac04bd8f2a513d1b6e3ea591cc4b6a8a303472bc364c629", "text": "