[Pang and Lee, 2005], customer product reviews (CR) [Hu and Liu, 2004], subjectivity/objectivity
classiﬁcation (SUBJ) [Pang and Lee, 2004] and opinion polarity (MPQA) [Wiebe et al., 2005]. We
plot the performance of both models for each checkpoint on all tasks to determine whether the
performance rate can be improved with LN.
The experimental results are illustrated in Figure 3. We observe that applying layer normalization
results both in speedup over the baseline as well as better ﬁnal results after 1M iterations are performed as shown in Table 3. We also let the model with layer normalization train for a total of a
month, resulting in further performance gains across all but one task. We note that the performance
4https://github.com/ryankiros/skip-thoughts
5https://github.com/NVIDIA/cnmem
8
100101102103
Updates x 200−900−800−700−600−500−400−300−200−1000Negative Log LikelihoodBaseline test
Baseline train
LN test
LN trainFigure 5: Handwriting sequence generation model negative log likelihood with and without layer
normalization. The models are trained with mini-batch size of 8 and sequence length of 500,
Training state-of-the-art, deep neural networks is computationally expensive.
One way to reduce the training time is to normalize the activities of the
neurons. A recently introduced technique called batch normalization uses the
distribution of the summed input to a neuron over a mini-batch of training
cases to compute a mean and variance which are then used to normalize the
summed input to that neuron on each training case. This significantly reduces
the training time in feed-forward neural networks. However, the effect of batch
normalization is dependent on the mini-batch size and it is not obvious how to
apply it to recurrent neural networks. In this paper, we transpose batch
normalization into layer normalization by computing the mean and variance used
for normalization from all of the summed inputs to the neurons in a layer on a
single training case. Like batch normalization, we also give each neuron its
own adaptive bias and gain which are applied after the normalization but before
the non-linearity. Unlike batch normalization, layer normalization performs
exactly the same computation at training and test times. It is also
straightforward to apply to recurrent neural networks by computing the
normalization statistics separately at each time step. Layer normalization is
very effective at stabilizing the hidden state dynamics in recurrent networks.
Empirically, we show that layer normalization can substantially reduce the
training time compared with previously published techniques.
Jimmy Lei Ba Jamie Ryan Kiros Geoffrey E. Hinton