more than 6%. It should be noted that the method of Wei et al. (2014), which achieves1%better
mAP on VOC-2012, is pre-trained on an extended 2000-class IL SVRC dataset, which includes
additional 1000 categories, semantically close to those in VOC datasets. It also beneﬁts from the
fusionwith anobjectdetection-assistedclassiﬁcation pi peline.
ImageClassiﬁcationonCaltech-101andCaltech-256. InthissectionweevaluateverydeepfeaturesonCaltech-101(Fei-Feiet al.,2004)andCaltech-256 (Grifﬁnet al.,2007)imageclassiﬁcation
benchmarks. Caltech-101contains9Kimageslabelledinto1 02classes(101objectcategoriesanda
backgroundclass), while Caltech-256 is larger with 31K ima ges and 257 classes. A standard evaluation protocolon these datasets is to generateseveral ran domsplits into training and test data and
report the average recognition performance across the spli ts, which is measured by the mean class
recall(whichcompensatesforadifferentnumberoftestima gesperclass). FollowingChatﬁeld etal.
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman