RWN-attention 0.747 0.556
DeepLab-v2-CRF 0.763 0.584
RWN-v2 0.773 0.595
Table 4: Quantitative comparison of spatial segmentation
smoothness. We extract the boundaries from the predicted
segmentations and evaluate them against ground truth object boundaries using max F-score (MF) and average precision (AP) metrics. These results suggest that RWN segmentations are spatially smoother than the DeepLab-CRF
segmentations across all baselines.
tions? Intuitively, spatially fragmented segmentations will
produce many false boundaries that do not correspond to
actual object boundaries. Thus, to test the spatial smoothness of a given segmentation, we extract the boundaries
from the segmentation and then compare these boundaries
against ground truth object boundaries using the standard
maximum F-score (MF) and average precision (AP) metrics, as done in the popular BSDS benchmark [22]. We perform this experiment on the Pascal SBD dataset and present
these results in Table 4. We can see that the boundaries extracted from the RWN segmentations yield better MF and
AP results compared to the boundaries extracted from the
different variants of the DeepLab-CRF system. Thus, these
results suggest that RWN produces spatially smoother segmentations than DeepLab-CRF.
5.2. Scene Labeling
Most current semantic segmentation methods rely on fully convolutional
networks (FCNs). However, their use of large receptive fields and many pooling
layers cause low spatial resolution inside the deep layers. This leads to
predictions with poor localization around the boundaries. Prior work has
attempted to address this issue by post-processing predictions with CRFs or
MRFs. But such models often fail to capture semantic relationships between
objects, which causes spatially disjoint predictions. To overcome these
problems, recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs into an FCN framework. The
downside of these new models is that they have much higher complexity than
traditional FCNs, which renders training and testing more challenging.
  In this work we introduce a simple, yet effective Convolutional Random Walk
Network (RWN) that addresses the issues of poor boundary localization and
spatially fragmented predictions with very little increase in model complexity.
Our proposed RWN jointly optimizes the objectives of pixelwise affinity and
semantic segmentation. It combines these two objectives via a novel random walk
layer that enforces consistent spatial grouping in the deep layers of the
network. Our RWN is implemented using standard convolution and matrix
multiplication. This allows an easy integration into existing FCN frameworks
and it enables end-to-end training of the whole network via standard
back-propagation. Our implementation of RWN requires just $131$ additional
parameters compared to the traditional FCNs, and yet it consistently produces
an improvement over the FCNs on semantic segmentation and scene labeling.
Gedas Bertasius Lorenzo Torresani Stella X. Yu Jianbo Shi