page 622, 2011.
Marcus Liwicki and Horst Bunke. Iam-ondb-an on-line english sentence database acquired from handwritten
text on a whiteboard. In ICDAR , 2005.
Alex Graves. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850 , 2013.
12
Supplementary Material
Application of layer normalization to each experiment
This section describes how layer normalization is applied to each of the papers’ experiments. For
notation convenience, we deﬁne layer normalization as a function mapping LN:RD!RDwith
two set of adaptive parameters, gains and biases :
LN(z;;) =(z)
+; (15)
=1
DDX
i=1zi;  =vuut1
DDX
i=1(zi)2; (16)
where,ziis theithelement of the vector z.
Teaching machines to read and comprehend and handwriting sequence generation
The basic LSTM equations used for these experiment are given by:
0
B@ft
it
ot
gt1
CA=Whht1+Wxxt+b (17)
Training state-of-the-art, deep neural networks is computationally expensive.
One way to reduce the training time is to normalize the activities of the
neurons. A recently introduced technique called batch normalization uses the
distribution of the summed input to a neuron over a mini-batch of training
cases to compute a mean and variance which are then used to normalize the
summed input to that neuron on each training case. This significantly reduces
the training time in feed-forward neural networks. However, the effect of batch
normalization is dependent on the mini-batch size and it is not obvious how to
apply it to recurrent neural networks. In this paper, we transpose batch
normalization into layer normalization by computing the mean and variance used
for normalization from all of the summed inputs to the neurons in a layer on a
single training case. Like batch normalization, we also give each neuron its
own adaptive bias and gain which are applied after the normalization but before
the non-linearity. Unlike batch normalization, layer normalization performs
exactly the same computation at training and test times. It is also
straightforward to apply to recurrent neural networks by computing the
normalization statistics separately at each time step. Layer normalization is
very effective at stabilizing the hidden state dynamics in recurrent networks.
Empirically, we show that layer normalization can substantially reduce the
training time compared with previously published techniques.
Jimmy Lei Ba Jamie Ryan Kiros Geoffrey E. Hinton