dimensions of width and depth.
In this paper, we consider a simple way of designing the
transformation functions: all Ti’s have the same topology.
This extends the VGG-style strategy of repeating layers of
the same shape, which is helpful for isolating a few factors
and extending to any large number of transformations. We
set the individual transformation Tito be the bottleneckshaped architecture [14], as illustrated in Fig. 1 (right). In
this case, the ﬁrst 1 1 layer in eachTiproduces the lowdimensional embedding.
equivalent
256, 1x1, 4
4, 3x3, 4
4, 1x1, 256
+256, 1x1, 4
4, 3x3, 4
4, 1x1, 256256, 1x1, 4
4, 3x3, 4
4, 1x1, 256
(a)....total 32
paths256-d in
+256, 1x1, 4
4, 3x3, 4256, 1x1, 4
4, 3x3, 4256, 1x1, 4
4, 3x3, 4
+concatenate
128, 1x1, 256256-d in
....total 32
paths
(b)256, 1x1, 128
We present a simple, highly modularized network architecture for image
classification. Our network is constructed by repeating a building block that
aggregates a set of transformations with the same topology. Our simple design
results in a homogeneous, multi-branch architecture that has only a few
hyper-parameters to set. This strategy exposes a new dimension, which we call
"cardinality" (the size of the set of transformations), as an essential factor
in addition to the dimensions of depth and width. On the ImageNet-1K dataset,
we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining
complexity, increasing cardinality is able to improve classification accuracy.
Moreover, increasing cardinality is more effective than going deeper or wider
when we increase the capacity. Our models, named ResNeXt, are the foundations
of our entry to the ILSVRC 2016 classification task in which we secured 2nd
place. We further investigate ResNeXt on an ImageNet-5K set and the COCO
detection set, also showing better results than its ResNet counterpart. The
code and models are publicly available online.
Saining Xie Ross Girshick Piotr Dollár Zhuowen Tu Kaiming He