memory) within two to four weeks.
3.1.1 Baseline Network Architectures
The advantages of SPP are independent of the convolutional network architectures used. We investigate
four different network architectures in existing publications [3], [4], [5] (or their modiﬁcations), and we
show SPP improves the accuracy of all these architectures. These baseline architectures are in Table 1 and
brieﬂy introduced below:
ZF-5 : this architecture is based on Zeiler and Fergus’s (ZF) “fast” (smaller) model [4]. The number
indicates ﬁve convolutional layers.
Convnet*-5 : this is a modiﬁcation on Krizhevsky
et al.’s network [3]. We put the two pooling layers
after conv 2and conv 3(instead of after conv 1and
conv 2). As a result, the feature maps after each
layer have the same size as ZF-5.
Overfeat-5/7 : this architecture is based on the
Overfeat paper [5], with some modiﬁcations as in
[6]. In contrast to ZF-5/Convnet*-5, this architecture produces a larger feature map ( 1818instead
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun