2.1.2 Convolutional layers
Another common building block is a convolutional layer (Fukushima, 1980; LeCun et al., 1989). It is
implemented by convolving an input vector or tensor with a kernel of the same rank, adding a bias
term, and applying a point-wise non-linearity. The entities here are still individual units (or grid
elements, e.g. pixels), but the relations are sparser. The dierences between a fully connected layer
and a convolutional layer impose some important relational inductive biases: locality and translation
invariance (Figure 1b). Locality re
ects that the arguments to the relational rule are those entities in
close proximity with one another in the input signal's coordinate space, isolated from distal entities.
Translation invariance re
ects reuse of the same rule across localities in the input. These biases
are very eective for processing natural image data because there is high covariance within local
6
(a) Fully connected
Sharing in space (b) Convolutional
Sharing in time (c) Recurrent
Figure 1: Reuse and sharing in common deep learning building blocks. (a) Fully connected layer,
in which all weights are independent, and there is no sharing. (b) Convolutional layer, in which
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu