The curvature along the widirection will change by a factor of1
2because the iwill also be twice
as large. As a result, for the same parameter update in the normalized model, the norm of the weight
vector effectively controls the learning rate for the weight vector. During learning, it is harder to
change the orientation of the weight vector with large norm. The normalization methods, therefore,
5
050100150200250300
iteration x 30034353637383940414243mean Recall@1Image Retrieval (Validation)
Order-Embedding + LN
Order-Embedding(a) Recall@1
050100150200250300
iteration x 3007172737475767778mean Recall@5Image Retrieval (Validation)
Order-Embedding + LN
Order-Embedding (b) Recall@5
050100150200250300
iteration x 30084858687888990mean Recall@10Image Retrieval (Validation)
Order-Embedding + LN
Order-Embedding (c) Recall@10
Figure 1: Recall@K curves using order-embeddings with and without layer normalization.
MSCOCO
Caption Retrieval Image Retrieval
Training state-of-the-art, deep neural networks is computationally expensive.
One way to reduce the training time is to normalize the activities of the
neurons. A recently introduced technique called batch normalization uses the
distribution of the summed input to a neuron over a mini-batch of training
cases to compute a mean and variance which are then used to normalize the
summed input to that neuron on each training case. This significantly reduces
the training time in feed-forward neural networks. However, the effect of batch
normalization is dependent on the mini-batch size and it is not obvious how to
apply it to recurrent neural networks. In this paper, we transpose batch
normalization into layer normalization by computing the mean and variance used
for normalization from all of the summed inputs to the neurons in a layer on a
single training case. Like batch normalization, we also give each neuron its
own adaptive bias and gain which are applied after the normalization but before
the non-linearity. Unlike batch normalization, layer normalization performs
exactly the same computation at training and test times. It is also
straightforward to apply to recurrent neural networks by computing the
normalization statistics separately at each time step. Layer normalization is
very effective at stabilizing the hidden state dynamics in recurrent networks.
Empirically, we show that layer normalization can substantially reduce the
training time compared with previously published techniques.
Jimmy Lei Ba Jamie Ryan Kiros Geoffrey E. Hinton