fc6=8 74.86 75.55 77.32 78.78 81.58
fc7=9 75.90 76.45 78.39 80.10 82.44
Table 6: Classiﬁcation mAP in Pascal VOC 2007. For SPP-net, the pool 5=7layer uses the 66 pyramid level.
(a) (b) (c) (d)
model no SPP (ZF-5) SPP (ZF-5) SPP (ZF-5) SPP (Overfeat-7)
crop crop full full
size 224224 224224 224- 224conv 4 80.12 81.03 - conv 5 84.40 83.76 - pool 5=7(66) 87.98 87.60 89.46 91.46
SPP pool 5=7 - 89.47 91.44 93.42
fc6=8 87.86 88.54 89.50 91.83
fc7=9 85.30 86.10 87.08 90.00
Table 7: Classiﬁcation accuracy in Caltech101. For SPP-net, the pool 5=7layer uses the 66 pyramid level.
We start from a baseline in Table 6 (a). The model is
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun