is entity X heavier than entity Y? . Here we consider rules which take one or two
arguments (unary and binary), and return a unary property value.
As an illustrative example of relational reasoning in machine learning, graphical models (Pearl,
1988; Koller and Friedman, 2009) can represent complex joint distributions by making explicit
random conditional independences among random variables. Such models have been very
successful because they capture the sparse structure which underlies many real-world generative
processes and because they support ecient algorithms for learning and reasoning. For example,
hidden Markov models constrain latent states to be conditionally independent of others given
the state at the previous time step, and observations to be conditionally independent given the
latent state at the current time step, which are well-matched to the relational structure of many
real-world causal processes. Explicitly expressing the sparse dependencies among variables
provides for various ecient inference and reasoning algorithms, such as message-passing, which
apply a common information propagation procedure across localities within a graphical model,
resulting in a composable, and partially parallelizable, reasoning procedure which can be applied
to graphical models of dierent sizes and shape.
In the remainder of the paper, we examine various deep learning methods through the lens of
their relational inductive biases, showing that existing methods often carry relational assumptions
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu