suffer from several limitations. Large receptive ﬁelds in the
Input
 DeepLab [6]
 DeepLab-CRF [6]
Figure 1: Examples illustrating shortcomings of prior semantic segmentation methods. Segments produced by
FCNs are poorly localized around object boundaries, while
Dense-CRF produce spatially-disjoint object segments.
convolutional layers and the presence of pooling layers lead
to low spatial resolution in the deepest FCN layers. As a result, their predicted segments tend to be blobby and lack ﬁne
object boundary details. We report in Fig. 1 some examples
illustrating typical poor localization of objects in the outputs
of FCNs. Recently, Chen at al. [6] addressed this issue by
applying a Dense-CRF post-processing step [15] on top of
coarse FCN segmentations. However, such approaches often fail to accurately capture semantic relationships between
objects and lead to spatially fragmented segmentations (see
an example in the last column of Fig. 1).
To address these problems several recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs directly into the FCN framework [27, 19, 17, 5]. However, these new models typically involve (1) a large number of parameters, (2) complex loss functions requiring specialized model training or
(3) recurrent layers, which make training and testing more
Most current semantic segmentation methods rely on fully convolutional
networks (FCNs). However, their use of large receptive fields and many pooling
layers cause low spatial resolution inside the deep layers. This leads to
predictions with poor localization around the boundaries. Prior work has
attempted to address this issue by post-processing predictions with CRFs or
MRFs. But such models often fail to capture semantic relationships between
objects, which causes spatially disjoint predictions. To overcome these
problems, recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs into an FCN framework. The
downside of these new models is that they have much higher complexity than
traditional FCNs, which renders training and testing more challenging.
  In this work we introduce a simple, yet effective Convolutional Random Walk
Network (RWN) that addresses the issues of poor boundary localization and
spatially fragmented predictions with very little increase in model complexity.
Our proposed RWN jointly optimizes the objectives of pixelwise affinity and
semantic segmentation. It combines these two objectives via a novel random walk
layer that enforces consistent spatial grouping in the deep layers of the
network. Our RWN is implemented using standard convolution and matrix
multiplication. This allows an easy integration into existing FCN frameworks
and it enables end-to-end training of the whole network via standard
back-propagation. Our implementation of RWN requires just $131$ additional
parameters compared to the traditional FCNs, and yet it consistently produces
an improvement over the FCNs on semantic segmentation and scene labeling.
Gedas Bertasius Lorenzo Torresani Stella X. Yu Jianbo Shi