that we can match its performance using only 7% of the
training steps, and can further exceed its accuracy by a
substantial margin. Using an ensemble of such networks
trained with Batch Normalization, we achieve the top-5
error rate that improves upon the best known results on
ImageNetclassiﬁcation.2 Towards Reducing Internal
CovariateShift
We deﬁne Internal Covariate Shift as the change in the
distribution of network activations due to the change in
networkparametersduringtraining. Toimprovethetraining, we seek to reduce the internal covariate shift. By
ﬁxingthe distributionof the layer inputs xas the training
progresses,weexpecttoimprovethetrainingspeed. Ithas
been long known (LeCunetal., 1998b; Wiesler &Ney,
2011) that the network training convergesfaster if its inputsarewhitened–i.e.,linearlytransformedtohavezero
meansandunitvariances,anddecorrelated. Aseachlayer
observestheinputsproducedbythelayersbelow,itwould
be advantageousto achieve the same whiteningof the inputsof each layer. By whitening the inputsto each layer,
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy