The network has a large number of convolutional and
pooling layers, with a softmax layer to predict the image
class, out of 1000 possibilities. Convolutional layers use
ReLU asthenonlinearity. Themaindifferenceto thenetwork described in (Szegedyet al., 2014) is that the 5×5
convolutionallayersare replacedby two consecutivelayers of3×3convolutionswith up to 128ﬁlters. The network contains 13.6·106parameters, and, other than the
top softmax layer, has no fully-connected layers. Moredetails are given in the Appendix. We refer to this model
asInception intherestofthetext. Themodelwastrained
using a version of Stochastic Gradient Descent with momentum(Sutskeveretal.,2013),usingthemini-batchsize
of32. Thetrainingwasperformedusingalarge-scale,distributed architecture (similar to (Deanet al., 2012)). All
networksare evaluatedastrainingprogressesbycomputing the validation accuracy @1, i.e. the probability of
predicting the correct label out of 1000 possibilities, on
aheld-outset,usinga singlecropperimage.
Inourexperiments,weevaluatedseveralmodiﬁcations
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy