box predictions are merged using the method of Sermanetetal . (2014). As can be seen from Table 9, applicationof the localisationConvNetto the whole i magesubstantiallyimprovesthe results
compared to using a center crop (Table 8), despite using the t op-5 predicted class labels instead of
thegroundtruth. Similarlytotheclassiﬁcationtask(Sect .4),testingatseveralscalesandcombining
thepredictionsofmultiplenetworksfurtherimprovesthep erformance.
Table9:Localisationerror
smallestimage side top-5localisationerror (%)
train(S) test(Q) val. test.
256 256 29.5 384 384 28.2 26.7
384 352,384 27.5 fusion: 256/256 and 384/352,384 26.9 25.3
Comparison with the state of the art. We compare our best localisation result with the state
of the art in Table 10. With 25.3%test error, our “VGG” team won the localisation challenge of
ILSVRC-2014 (Russakovskyet al., 2014). Notably, our resul ts are considerably better than those
of the ILSVRC-2013winnerOverfeat(Sermanetet al., 2014), even thoughwe used less scales and
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman