Pascal VOC 2007 dataset. Table 9 shows our results
on various layers, by using 1-scale ( s=688) or 5-scale.
Here the R-CNN results are as reported in [7] using
the AlexNet [3] with 5 conv layers. Using the pool 5
layers (in our case the pooled features), our result
(44.9%) is comparable with R-CNN’s result (44.2%).
But using the non-ﬁne-tuned fc 6layers, our results are
inferior. An explanation is that our fc layers are pretrained using image regions, while in the detection
case they are used on the feature map regions. The
feature map regions can have strong activations near
the window boundaries, while the image regions may
not. This difference of usages can be addressed by
ﬁne-tuning. Using the ﬁne-tuned fc layers (ftfc 6;7), our
results are comparable with or slightly better than
the ﬁne-tuned results of R-CNN. After bounding box
regression, our 5-scale result ( 59.2%) is 0.7% better
than R-CNN (58.5%), and our 1-scale result (58.0%)
is 0.5% worse.
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun