lines of active research are exploring these issues (Watters et al., 2017; van Steenkiste et al., 2018;
Li et al., 2018; Kipf et al., 2018) but as of yet there is no single method which can reliably extract
discrete entities from sensory data. Developing such a method is an exciting challenge for future
7Covariance means, roughly, that the activations vary in a predictable way as a function of the ordering of the
incoming edges.
23
research, and once solved will likely open the door for much more powerful and 
exible reasoning
algorithms.
A related question is how to adaptively modify graph structures during the course of computation.
For example, if an object fractures into multiple pieces, a node representing that object also ought
to split into multiple nodes. Similarly, it might be useful to only represent edges between objects
that are in contact, thus requiring the ability to add or remove edges depending on context. The
question of how to support this type of adaptivity is also actively being researched, and in particular,
some of the methods used for identifying the underlying structure of a graph may be applicable (e.g.
Li et al., 2018; Kipf et al., 2018).
Human cognition makes the strong assumption that the world is composed of objects and
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu