sampledfrom [256;512] ,andthreetest scales Qwereconsidered: {256,384,512}.
ConvNet conﬁg. (Table 1) Evaluationmethod top-1 val. error(%) top-5 val. error (%)
Ddense 24.8 7.5
multi-crop 24.6 7.5
multi-crop &dense 24.4 7.2
Edense 24.8 7.5
multi-crop 24.6 7.4
multi-crop &dense 24.4 7.1
4.4 C ONVNETFUSION
Upuntilnow,weevaluatedtheperformanceofindividualCon vNetmodels. Inthispartoftheexperiments,wecombinetheoutputsofseveralmodelsbyaveragin gtheirsoft-maxclassposteriors. This
improvesthe performancedueto complementarityof the mode ls, andwas used in the top ILSVRC
submissions in 2012 (Krizhevskyet al., 2012) and 2013 (Zeil er&Fergus, 2013; Sermanetet al.,
2014).
The results are shown in Table 6. By the time of ILSVRC submiss ion we had only trained the
single-scale networks, as well as a multi-scale model D (by ﬁ ne-tuning only the fully-connected
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman