be advantageousto achieve the same whiteningof the inputsof each layer. By whitening the inputsto each layer,
we would take a step towards achieving the ﬁxed distributions of inputs that would remove the ill effects of the
internalcovariateshift.
We couldconsiderwhiteningactivationsat everytraining step or at some interval, either by modifying the
network directly or by changing the parameters of the
optimization algorithm to depend on the network activation values (Wiesleret al., 2014; Raikoetal., 2012;
Poveyet al., 2014; Desjardins&Kavukcuoglu). However, if these modiﬁcations are interspersed with the optimization steps, then the gradient descent step may attempt to update the parameters in a way that requires
the normalization to be updated, which reduces the effect of the gradient step. For example, consider a layer
with the input uthat addsthe learned bias b, and normalizes the result by subtracting the mean of the activation
computed over the training data: /hatwidex=x−E[x]where
x=u+b,X={x1...N}is the set of values of xover
the training set, and E [x] =1
N/summationtextN
i=1xi. If a gradient
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy