entire instance segmentation network end-to-end.
Because we deal with a variable number of instances for
every image, our CRF needs to be dynamically instantiated
to have a different number of labels for every image, as observed in [ 3]. Therefore, unlike [ 60], none of our weights
are class-speciﬁc. This weight-sharing not only allows us to
deal with variable length inputs, but class-speciﬁc weights
(a) Original
ground truth, G(b) Prediction, P (c) “Matched”
ground truth, G∗
Figure 6: Due to the problem of label permutations, we
“match” the ground truth with our prediction before computing the loss when training.
also do not make sense in the case of instance segmentation
since a class label has no particular semantic meaning.
3.4. Loss Function
When training for instance segmentation, we have a
single loss function which we backpropagate through our
instance- and semantic-segmentation modules to update all
the parameters. As discussed previously, we need to deal
with different permutations of our ﬁnal labelling which
could have the same ﬁnal result. The works of [ 57] and [ 58]
order instances by depth to break this symmetry. However,
Semantic segmentation and object detection research have recently achieved
rapid progress. However, the former task has no notion of different instances
of the same object, and the latter operates at a coarse, bounding-box level. We
propose an Instance Segmentation system that produces a segmentation map where
each pixel is assigned an object class and instance identity label. Most
approaches adapt object detectors to produce segments instead of boxes. In
contrast, our method is based on an initial semantic segmentation module, which
feeds into an instance subnetwork. This subnetwork uses the initial
category-level segmentation, along with cues from the output of an object
detector, within an end-to-end CRF to predict instances. This part of our model
is dynamically instantiated to produce a variable number of instances per
image. Our end-to-end approach requires no post-processing and considers the
image holistically, instead of processing independent proposals. Therefore,
unlike some related work, a pixel cannot belong to multiple instances.
Furthermore, far more precise segmentations are achieved, as shown by our
state-of-the-art results (particularly at high IoU thresholds) on the Pascal
VOC and Cityscapes datasets.
Anurag Arnab Philip H. S Torr