feature mapsare paddedwith zeros, while in the case of dense evaluationthe paddingfor the same
crop naturally comes from the neighbouring parts of an image (due to both the convolutions and
spatial pooling), which substantially increases the overa ll network receptive ﬁeld, so more context
iscaptured. Whilewebelievethatinpracticetheincreased computationtimeofmultiplecropsdoes
notjustifythepotentialgainsinaccuracy,forreferencew ealsoevaluateournetworksusing 50crops
perscale( 5×5regulargridwith 2ﬂips),foratotalof 150cropsover 3scales,whichiscomparable
to144cropsover 4scalesusedbySzegedyetal. (2014).
3.3 IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS
OurimplementationisderivedfromthepubliclyavailableC ++ Caffetoolbox(Jia,2013)(branched
out in December 2013), but contains a number of signiﬁcant mo diﬁcations, allowing us to perform
trainingandevaluationonmultipleGPUsinstalledinasing lesystem,aswellastrainandevaluateon
full-size (uncropped) images at multiple scales (as descri bed above). Multi-GPU training exploits
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman