object detection results by replacing the ConvNet of Krizhe vskyet al. (2012) with our 16-layer
model. Similar gains over a more shallow architecture of Kri zhevskyet al. (2012) have been ob13
Publishedasa conferencepaperat ICLR2015
Table 12: Comparison with the state of the art in single-image action c lassiﬁcation on VOC2012. Our models are denoted as “VGG”. Results marked with * were a chieved using ConvNets
pre-trainedonthe extended ILSVRCdataset (1512classes).
Method VOC-2012 (meanAP)
(Oquab et al., 2014) 70.2∗
(Gkioxari etal.,2014) 73.6
(Hoai,2014) 76.3
VGG Net-D& Net-E,image-only 79.2
VGG Net-D& Net-E,image and bounding box 84.0
served in semantic segmentation (Longet al., 2014), image c aption generation (Kirosetal., 2014;
Karpathy& Fei-Fei, 2014),textureandmaterialrecognitio n(Cimpoiet al., 2014; Bell etal., 2014).
C PAPERREVISIONS
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman