Number of Random Walk StepsIOU AccuracyAccuracy versus the Number of Random Walk Steps
  
Mean−class IOUFigure 7: IOU accuracy as a function of the number of random walk steps. From this plot we observe that the segmentation accuracy keeps improving as we apply more random walk steps and that it reaches its peak when the random
walk process converges.
DeepLab-largeFOV RWN-largeFOV
Stanford-BG 65.74 68.31
Sift-Flow 67.31 69.85
Table 5: Scene labeling results on the Stanford Background
and Sift-Flow datasets measured according to the overall
IOU evaluation metric. We use a DeepLab-largeFOV network as base model, and show that our RWN yields better
results on both of these scene labeling datasets.
respectively. In comparison, choosing R= 5 and applying random walk until convergence yields the accuracies of
75:8%and77:9%, which is slightly better. However, note
that selecting R= 40 , and applying multiple random walk
steps does not yield any improvement in segmentation accuracy. These experiments show the ﬂexibility of our model
compared to the MRF or CRF models, which typically use
graphs with a ﬁxed grid structure. Our model has the ability
to use different graph structures depending on the problem.
6. Conclusion
Most current semantic segmentation methods rely on fully convolutional
networks (FCNs). However, their use of large receptive fields and many pooling
layers cause low spatial resolution inside the deep layers. This leads to
predictions with poor localization around the boundaries. Prior work has
attempted to address this issue by post-processing predictions with CRFs or
MRFs. But such models often fail to capture semantic relationships between
objects, which causes spatially disjoint predictions. To overcome these
problems, recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs into an FCN framework. The
downside of these new models is that they have much higher complexity than
traditional FCNs, which renders training and testing more challenging.
  In this work we introduce a simple, yet effective Convolutional Random Walk
Network (RWN) that addresses the issues of poor boundary localization and
spatially fragmented predictions with very little increase in model complexity.
Our proposed RWN jointly optimizes the objectives of pixelwise affinity and
semantic segmentation. It combines these two objectives via a novel random walk
layer that enforces consistent spatial grouping in the deep layers of the
network. Our RWN is implemented using standard convolution and matrix
multiplication. This allows an easy integration into existing FCN frameworks
and it enables end-to-end training of the whole network via standard
back-propagation. Our implementation of RWN requires just $131$ additional
parameters compared to the traditional FCNs, and yet it consistently produces
an improvement over the FCNs on semantic segmentation and scene labeling.
Gedas Bertasius Lorenzo Torresani Stella X. Yu Jianbo Shi