for fast feature embedding,” http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/,
2013.
[36] A. G. Howard, “Some improvements on deep convolutional
neural network based image classiﬁcation,” ArXiv:1312.5402 ,
2013.
[37] H. Jegou, F. Perronnin, M. Douze, J. Sanchez, P . Perez, and
C. Schmid, “Aggregating local image descriptors into compact
codes,” TP AMI , vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1704–1716, 2012.
[38] C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin, “Libsvm: a library for support
vector machines,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and
Technology (TIST) , 2011.
[39] X. Wang, M. Yang, S. Zhu, and Y. Lin, “Regionlets for generic
object detection,” in ICCV , 2013.
[40] C. Szegedy, A. Toshev, and D. Erhan, “Deep neural networks
for object detection,” in NIPS , 2013.
CHANGELOG
arXiv v1 . Initial technical report for ECCV 2014 paper.
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun