2018), to classify and segment images and videos (Wang et al., 2018c; Hu et al., 2017) and 3D
meshes and point clouds (Wang et al., 2018d), to classify regions in images (Chen et al., 2018a), to
perform semi-supervised text classication (Kipf and Welling, 2017), and in machine translation
(Vaswani et al., 2017; Shaw et al., 2018; Gulcehre et al., 2018). They have been used within both
model-free (Wang et al., 2018b) and model-based (Hamrick et al., 2017; Pascanu et al., 2017;
Sanchez-Gonzalez et al., 2018) continuous control, for model-free reinforcement learning (Hamrick
et al., 2018; Zambaldi et al., 2018), and for more classical approaches to planning (Toyer et al.,
2017).
Many traditional computer science problems, which involve reasoning about discrete entities and
structure, have also been explored with graph neural networks, such as combinatorial optimization
(Bello et al., 2016; Nowak et al., 2017; Dai et al., 2017), boolean satisability (Selsam et al., 2018),
program representation and verication (Allamanis et al., 2018; Li et al., 2016), modeling cellular
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu