Model BPC
Stacked LSTM (Graves, 2013) 1.67
MRNN (Sutskever et al., 2011) 1.60
GF-LSTM (Chung et al., 2015) 1.58
Grid-LSTM (Kalchbrenner et al., 2015) 1.47
MI-LSTM (Wu et al., 2016) 1.44
Recurrent Memory Array Structures (Rocki, 2016a) 1.40
SF-LSTM (Rocki, 2016b)z1.37
HyperNetworks (Ha et al., 2016) 1.35
LayerNorm HyperNetworks (Ha et al., 2016) 1.34
Recurrent Highway Networks (Zilly et al., 2016) 1.32
LayerNorm LSTMy1.39
HM-LSTM 1.34
LayerNorm HM-LSTM 1.32
PAQ8hp12 (Mahoney, 2005) 1.32
decomp8 (Mahoney, 2009) 1.28
Table 1: BPC on the Penn Treebank test set (left) and Hutter Prize Wikipedia test set (right). ( ) This
model is a variant of the HM-LSTM that does not discretize the boundary detector states. ( y) These
models are implemented by the authors to evaluate the performance using layer normalization (Ba
Learning both hierarchical and temporal representation has been among the
long-standing challenges of recurrent neural networks. Multiscale recurrent
neural networks have been considered as a promising approach to resolve this
issue, yet there has been a lack of empirical evidence showing that this type
of models can actually capture the temporal dependencies by discovering the
latent hierarchical structure of the sequence. In this paper, we propose a
novel multiscale approach, called the hierarchical multiscale recurrent neural
networks, which can capture the latent hierarchical structure in the sequence
by encoding the temporal dependencies with different timescales using a novel
update mechanism. We show some evidence that our proposed multiscale
architecture can discover underlying hierarchical structure in the sequences
without using explicit boundary information. We evaluate our proposed model on
character-level language modelling and handwriting sequence modelling.
Junyoung Chung Sungjin Ahn Yoshua Bengio