random walk layer is beneﬁcial and that our model is
ﬂexible to use different graph structures.
5.1. Semantic Segmentation Task
Standard Evaluation. In Table 2, we present semantic
segmentation results on the Pascal SBD dataset [10], which
contains 8055 training and 2857 testing images. These results indicate that RWN consistently outperforms all three
of the DeepLab baselines. In Figure 3, we also compare
qualitative segmentation results of a DeepLab-v2 network
and our RWN model. We note that the RWN segmentations contain fewer false positive predictions and are also
spatially smoother across the object regions.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200.20.250.30.350.40.450.50.55
Trimap Width (in Pixels)Pixel Classification Error (%)Localization Around the Boundaries Error
  
DeepLab
RWNFigure 5: Localization error around the object boundaries
within a trimap. Compared to the DeepLab system (blue),
our RWN (red) achieves lower segmentation error around
object boundaries for all trimap widths.
Furthermore, in Table 3, we present experiments where
we compare RWN with models using dense CRFs [15] to
post-process the predictions of DeepLab systems. We also
Most current semantic segmentation methods rely on fully convolutional
networks (FCNs). However, their use of large receptive fields and many pooling
layers cause low spatial resolution inside the deep layers. This leads to
predictions with poor localization around the boundaries. Prior work has
attempted to address this issue by post-processing predictions with CRFs or
MRFs. But such models often fail to capture semantic relationships between
objects, which causes spatially disjoint predictions. To overcome these
problems, recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs into an FCN framework. The
downside of these new models is that they have much higher complexity than
traditional FCNs, which renders training and testing more challenging.
  In this work we introduce a simple, yet effective Convolutional Random Walk
Network (RWN) that addresses the issues of poor boundary localization and
spatially fragmented predictions with very little increase in model complexity.
Our proposed RWN jointly optimizes the objectives of pixelwise affinity and
semantic segmentation. It combines these two objectives via a novel random walk
layer that enforces consistent spatial grouping in the deep layers of the
network. Our RWN is implemented using standard convolution and matrix
multiplication. This allows an easy integration into existing FCN frameworks
and it enables end-to-end training of the whole network via standard
back-propagation. Our implementation of RWN requires just $131$ additional
parameters compared to the traditional FCNs, and yet it consistently produces
an improvement over the FCNs on semantic segmentation and scene labeling.
Gedas Bertasius Lorenzo Torresani Stella X. Yu Jianbo Shi