show the settings of the templates.
setting AP@0.5 AP
ResNet-50 164d 47.6 26.5
ResNeXt-50 324d 49.7 27.5
ResNet-101 164d 51.1 29.8
ResNeXt-101 324d 51.9 30.0
Table 8. Object detection results on the COCO minival set.
ResNeXt and its ResNet counterpart have similar complexity.
5.4. Experiments on COCO object detection
Next we evaluate the generalizability on the COCO object detection set [27]. We train the models on the 80k training set plus a 35k val subset and evaluate on a 5k val subset
(called minival ), following [1]. We evaluate the COCOstyle Average Precision (AP) as well as AP@IoU=0.5 [27].
We adopt the basic Faster R-CNN [32] and follow [14] to
plug ResNet/ResNeXt into it. The models are pre-trained
on ImageNet-1K and ﬁne-tuned on the detection set. Implementation details are in the appendix.
We present a simple, highly modularized network architecture for image
classification. Our network is constructed by repeating a building block that
aggregates a set of transformations with the same topology. Our simple design
results in a homogeneous, multi-branch architecture that has only a few
hyper-parameters to set. This strategy exposes a new dimension, which we call
"cardinality" (the size of the set of transformations), as an essential factor
in addition to the dimensions of depth and width. On the ImageNet-1K dataset,
we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining
complexity, increasing cardinality is able to improve classification accuracy.
Moreover, increasing cardinality is more effective than going deeper or wider
when we increase the capacity. Our models, named ResNeXt, are the foundations
of our entry to the ILSVRC 2016 classification task in which we secured 2nd
place. We further investigate ResNeXt on an ImageNet-5K set and the COCO
detection set, also showing better results than its ResNet counterpart. The
code and models are publicly available online.
Saining Xie Ross Girshick Piotr Dollár Zhuowen Tu Kaiming He