error from 10.95% to 9.36%. Combining the two fullimage views (with ﬂipping) further reduces the top-5
error to 9.14%.
In the Overfeat paper [5], the views are also extracted from the convolutional feature maps instead
of image crops. However, their views cannot have arbitrary sizes; rather, the windows are those where the
pooled features match the desired dimensionality. We
empirically ﬁnd that these restricted windows are less
beneﬁcial than our ﬂexibly located/sized windows.
3.1.6 Summary and Results for ILSVRC 2014
In Table 4 we compare with previous state-of-theart methods. Krizhevsky et al .’s [3] is the winning
method in ILSVRC 2012; Overfeat [5], Howard’s [36],
and Zeiler and Fergus’s [4] are the leading methodsrank team top-5 test
1 GoogLeNet [32] 6.66
2 VGG [33] 7.32
3 ours 8.06
4 Howard 8.11
5 DeeperVision 9.50
6 NUS-BST 9.79
7 TTIC ECP 10.22
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun