pers on:0.32
hors e:1.68
hors e:0.61
horse:1.29
per son:1.23
c hair:0.87pers on:1.79
per son:0.91
sofa:0.22person:0.85
sofa:0.58
c ow:2.36
cow:1.88co w:1 .86
cow:1.82cow:1.39 cow:1.31
ca t:0.5 2person:1.02
person:0.40
bicy cle:2.85bicy cle:2.71
bicycle:2.04bicy cle:0.67person:3.35
person:2.39
pers on:2.11
pers on:0.27
person:0.22bus:1.42
person:3.29person:1.18
bottle:1.15pottedplant:0.81
s heep:1.81s heep:1.17
sheep:0.81
bird:0.24pott edplant:0.35 pot tedplant: 0. 20
car:1.31person:1.60
person:0.62
dog:0.37person:0.38
dog:0.99person:1.48
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun