Table 3. Patch test accuracy by category. CNN: GoogLeNet . See
the supplemental material for a full confusion matrix.
5. Experiments and Results
5.1. Patch material classiﬁcation
In this section, we evaluate the effect of many different
design decisions for training methods for material classiﬁcation and segmentation, including various CNN architectures,
patch sizes, and amounts of data.
CNN Architectures. Our ultimate goal is full material segmentation, but we are also interested in exploring which
CNN architectures give the best results for classifying single patches. Among the networks and parameter variations we tried we found the best performing networks were
AlexNet [13],VGG-16 [27] and GoogLeNet [28].AlexNet
andGoogLeNet are re-implementations by BVLC [ 11], and
VGG-16 is conﬁguration D (a 16 layer network) of [ 27].
All models were obtained from the Caffe Model Zoo [ 11].
Our experiments use AlexNet for evaluating material classiﬁcation design decisions and combinations of AlexNet and
GoogLeNet for evaluating material segmentation. Tables 2
and 3 summarize patch material classiﬁcation results on our
dataset. Figure 10 shows correct and incorrect predictions
made with high conﬁdence.
Recognizing materials in real-world images is a challenging task. Real-world
materials have rich surface texture, geometry, lighting conditions, and
clutter, which combine to make the problem particularly difficult. In this
paper, we introduce a new, large-scale, open dataset of materials in the wild,
the Materials in Context Database (MINC), and combine this dataset with deep
learning to achieve material recognition and segmentation of images in the
wild.
  MINC is an order of magnitude larger than previous material databases, while
being more diverse and well-sampled across its 23 categories. Using MINC, we
train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for two tasks: classifying materials
from patches, and simultaneous material recognition and segmentation in full
images. For patch-based classification on MINC we found that the best
performing CNN architectures can achieve 85.2% mean class accuracy. We convert
these trained CNN classifiers into an efficient fully convolutional framework
combined with a fully connected conditional random field (CRF) to predict the
material at every pixel in an image, achieving 73.1% mean class accuracy. Our
experiments demonstrate that having a large, well-sampled dataset such as MINC
is crucial for real-world material recognition and segmentation.
Sean Bell Paul Upchurch Noah Snavely Kavita Bala