a 4-D vector storing its center coordinates, width, and heig ht. There is a choice of whether the
boundingbox prediction is shared across all classes (singl e-class regression, SCR (Sermanetet al.,
2014))orisclass-speciﬁc(per-classregression,PCR).In theformercase,thelastlayeris4-D,while
in the latter it is 4000-D (since there are 1000 classes in the dataset). Apart from the last bounding
boxpredictionlayer,weuse theConvNetarchitectureD (Tab le1),whichcontains16weightlayers
andwasfoundtobe thebest-performingin theclassiﬁcation task (Sect.4).
Training. Training of localisation ConvNets is similar to that of the c lassiﬁcation ConvNets
(Sect.3.1). Themaindifferenceisthatwereplacethelogis ticregressionobjectivewithaEuclidean
loss,whichpenalisesthedeviationofthepredictedboundi ngboxparametersfromtheground-truth.
We trainedtwo localisation models, each on a single scale: S= 256andS= 384(due to the time
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman