Figure 4: Dierent internal GN block congurations. See Section 3.2 for details on the notation,
and Section 4 for details about each variant. (a) A full GN predicts node, edge, and global output
attributes based on incoming node, edge, and global attributes. (b) An independent, recurrent
update block takes input and hidden graphs, and the functions are RNNs (Sanchez-Gonzalez
et al., 2018). (c) An MPNN (Gilmer et al., 2017) predicts node, edge, and global output attributes
based on incoming node, edge, and global attributes. Note that the global prediction does not
include aggregated edges. (d) A NLNN (Wang et al., 2018c) only predicts node output attributes.
(e) A relation network (Raposo et al., 2017; Santoro et al., 2017) only uses the edge predictions
to predict global attributes. (f) A Deep Set (Zaheer et al., 2017) bypasses the edge update and
predicts updated global attributes.
4.2.1 Message-passing neural network (MPNN)
Gilmer et al. (2017)'s MPNN generalizes a number of previous architectures and can be translated
naturally into the GN formalism. Following the MPNN paper's terminology (see Gilmer et al.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu