on graphs, and provides a straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and
producing structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational reasoning
and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more sophisticated, interpretable,
and 
exible patterns of reasoning. As a companion to this paper, we have also released an
open-source software library for building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use
them in practice.
1 Introduction
A key signature of human intelligence is the ability to make \innite use of nite means" (Humboldt,
1836; Chomsky, 1965), in which a small set of elements (such as words) can be productively
composed in limitless ways (such as into new sentences). This re
ects the principle of combinatorial
generalization , that is, constructing new inferences, predictions, and behaviors from known building
blocks. Here we explore how to improve modern AI's capacity for combinatorial generalization by
Corresponding author: peterbattaglia@google.com
1arXiv:1806.01261v3  [cs.LG]  17 Oct 2018
biasing learning towards structured representations and computations, and in particular, systems
that operate on graphs.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu