weights lead to smallergradients, and Batch Normalizationwill stabilize theparametergrowth.
We further conjecture that Batch Normalization may
leadthelayerJacobianstohavesingularvaluescloseto1,
which is known to be beneﬁcial for training (Saxeet al.,
2013). Consider two consecutive layers with normalized
inputs, and the transformation between these normalized
vectors:/hatwidez =F(/hatwidex). Ifweassumethat /hatwidexand/hatwidezareGaussian
anduncorrelated,andthat F(/hatwidex)≈J/hatwidexisalineartransformationforthe givenmodelparameters,thenboth /hatwidexand/hatwidez
have unit covariances, and I=Cov[/hatwidez] =JCov[/hatwidex]JT=
JJT. Thus,JJT=I, and so all singular values of J
are equal to 1, which preserves the gradient magnitudes
during backpropagation. In reality, the transformation is
notlinear,andthenormalizedvaluesarenotguaranteedto
be Gaussian nor independent, but we nevertheless expect
Batch Normalization to help make gradient propagation
better behaved. The precise effect of Batch Normalization on gradient propagation remains an area of further
study.
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy