about 1/160 of R-CNN’s; in the 5-scale version, this
complexity is about 1/24 of R-CNN’s.
In Table 10, we provide a fair comparison on the
running time of the feature computation using the
same SPP (ZF-5) model . The implementation of RCNN is from the code published by the authors implemented in Caffe [35]. We also implement our feature
computation in Caffe . In Table 10 we evaluate the
average time of 100 random VOC images using GPU.
R-CNN takes 14.37s per image for convolutions, while
our 1-scale version takes only 0.053s per image. So
ours is 270faster than R-CNN. Our 5-scale version
takes 0.293s per image for convolutions, so is 49 
faster than R-CNN. Our convolutional feature computation is so fast that the computational time of fc layers
takes a considerable portion. Table 10 shows that the
GPU time of computing the 4,096-d fc 7features is
0.089s per image. Considering both convolutional and
fully-connected features, our 1-scale version is 102
faster than R-CNN and is 1.2% inferior; our 5-scale
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun