requires careful tuning of the model hyper-parameters,
speciﬁcallythelearningrateusedinoptimization,aswell
as the initial values for the model parameters. The trainingiscomplicatedbythefactthattheinputstoeachlayer
areaffectedbytheparametersofallprecedinglayers–so
that small changes to the network parameters amplify as
thenetworkbecomesdeeper.
The change in the distributions of layers’ inputs
presents a problem because the layers need to continuously adapt to the new distribution. When the input distributiontoalearningsystemchanges,itissaidtoexperiencecovariateshift (Shimodaira, 2000). This is typically
handled via domain adaptation (Jiang, 2008). However,
the notion of covariate shift can be extended beyond the
learningsystemasawhole,toapplytoitsparts,suchasa
sub-networkora layer. Considera networkcomputing
ℓ=F2(F1(u,Θ1),Θ2)
whereF1andF2are arbitrary transformations, and the
parameters Θ1,Θ2are to be learned so as to minimize
the lossℓ. Learning Θ2can be viewed as if the inputs
x =F1(u,Θ1)arefedintothesub-network
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy