Focusing on segmentation accuracy, we see from Table 4(a) that our best single model is GoogLeNet without
average pooling (6% better than with pooling). The best
ensemble is 2 CNNs: GoogLeNet (no average pooling) and
AlexNet (patch scale: 46.5%), combined with arithmetic
mean. Larger ensembles perform worse since we are aver7
Correct
Fabric (99%) Foliage (99%) Food (99%) Leather (99%)Correct
Metal (99%) Mirror (99%) Painted (99%) Plastic (99%)Incorrect
T: Wood T: Polished stone T: Water T: Fabric
P: Stone (90%) P: Water (35%) P: Carpet (27%) P: Foliage (67%)
Figure 10. High conﬁdence predictions. Top two rows: correct
predictions. Bottom row: incorrect predictions ( T: true, P: predicted). Percentages indicate conﬁdence (the predictions shown are
at least this conﬁdent). CNN: GoogLeNet.
aging worse CNNs. In Figure 8, we show example labeling
results on test images.
5.3. Comparing MINC to FMD
Compared to FMD, the size and diversity of MINC is
Recognizing materials in real-world images is a challenging task. Real-world
materials have rich surface texture, geometry, lighting conditions, and
clutter, which combine to make the problem particularly difficult. In this
paper, we introduce a new, large-scale, open dataset of materials in the wild,
the Materials in Context Database (MINC), and combine this dataset with deep
learning to achieve material recognition and segmentation of images in the
wild.
  MINC is an order of magnitude larger than previous material databases, while
being more diverse and well-sampled across its 23 categories. Using MINC, we
train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for two tasks: classifying materials
from patches, and simultaneous material recognition and segmentation in full
images. For patch-based classification on MINC we found that the best
performing CNN architectures can achieve 85.2% mean class accuracy. We convert
these trained CNN classifiers into an efficient fully convolutional framework
combined with a fully connected conditional random field (CRF) to predict the
material at every pixel in an image, achieving 73.1% mean class accuracy. Our
experiments demonstrate that having a large, well-sampled dataset such as MINC
is crucial for real-world material recognition and segmentation.
Sean Bell Paul Upchurch Noah Snavely Kavita Bala