Finally, scale jittering at training time ( S∈[256;512] ) leads to signiﬁcantly better results than
training on images with ﬁxed smallest side ( S= 256orS= 384), even though a single scale is
usedattesttime. Thisconﬁrmsthattrainingsetaugmentati onbyscalejitteringisindeedhelpfulfor
capturingmulti-scaleimagestatistics.
Table3:ConvNetperformanceatasingle testscale.
ConvNet conﬁg. (Table 1) smallest image side top-1 val.error (%) top-5 val.error (%)
train(S)test (Q)
A 256 256 29.6 10.4
A-LRN 256 256 29.7 10.5
B 256 256 28.7 9.9
C256 256 28.1 9.4
384 384 28.1 9.3
[256;512] 384 27.3 8.8
D256 256 27.0 8.8
384 384 26.8 8.7
[256;512] 384 25.6 8.1
E256 256 27.3 9.0
384 384 26.9 8.7
[256;512] 384 25.5 8.0
4.2 M ULTI-SCALEEVALUATION
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman