are analogous to message-passing (Gilmer et al., 2017), where the same local update procedure is
applied iteratively to propagate information across the structure (Figure 7). If we exclude the global
u(which aggregates information from across the nodes and edges), the information that a node
has access to after msteps of propagation is determined by the set of nodes and edges that are at
mostmhops away. This can be interpreted as breaking down a complex computation into smaller
elementary steps. The steps can also be used to capture sequentiality in time. In our ball-spring
example, if each propagation step predicts the physical dynamics over one time step of duration  t,
then theMpropagation steps result in a total simulation time of, Mt.
A common architecture design is what we call the encode-process-decode conguration (Hamrick
et al. (2018); also see Figure 6ba): an input graph, Ginpis transformed into a latent representation,
G0, by an encoder, GNenc; a shared core block, GNcore, is applied Mtimes to return GM; and
nally an output graph, Gout, is decoded by GNdec. For example, in our running example, the
encoder might compute the initial forces and interaction energies between the balls, the core might
19
m=0
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu