boxpredictionsandcanfurtherimprovetheresults.
A.2 L OCALISATION EXPERIMENTS
In this section we ﬁrst determine the best-performinglocal isation setting (using the ﬁrst test protocol), and then evaluate it in a fully-ﬂedged scenario (the se cond protocol). The localisation error
is measured according to the ILSVRC criterion (Russakovsky et al., 2014), i.e. the bounding box
predictionis deemed correctif its intersectionoverunion ratio with the ground-truthboundingbox
isabove0.5.
Settings comparison. As can be seen from Table 8, per-class regression (PCR) outpe rforms the
class-agnostic single-class regression (SCR), which diff ers from the ﬁndings of Sermanetetal.
(2014), where PCR was outperformed by SCR. We also note that ﬁ ne-tuning all layers for the localisation task leads to noticeablybetter results than ﬁne -tuningonly the fully-connectedlayers(as
donein(Sermanetet al.,2014)). Intheseexperiments,thes mallestimagessidewassetto S= 384;
theresultswith S= 256exhibitthesamebehaviourandarenotshownforbrevity.
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman