of something, but rather from the absence . For illustration, consider the task of predicting the center
7
H H
O
The brown 
dog jumped. The 
brown dog jumped (a) (b) 
(c) (d) 
(e) (f) 
Molecule Mass-Spring System 
n-body System Rigid Body System 
Sentence and Parse Tree Image and Fully-Connected Scene Graph Figure 2: Dierent graph representations. (a) A molecule, in which each atom is represented as a
node and edges correspond to bonds (e.g. Duvenaud et al., 2015). (b) A mass-spring system, in
which the rope is dened by a sequence of masses which are represented as nodes in the graph (e.g.
Battaglia et al., 2016; Chang et al., 2017). (c) A n-body system, in which the bodies are nodes and
the underlying graph is fully connected (e.g. Battaglia et al., 2016; Chang et al., 2017). (d) A rigid
body system, in which the balls and walls are nodes, and the underlying graph denes interactions
between the balls and between the balls and the walls (e.g. Battaglia et al., 2016; Chang et al., 2017).
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu