Trainingimagerescalingisexplainedbelow.
Training image size. LetSbe the smallest side of an isotropically-rescaledtraining image, from
which the ConvNet input is cropped (we also refer to Sas the training scale). While the crop size
is ﬁxed to 224×224, in principle Scan take on any value not less than 224: forS= 224the crop
will capture whole-image statistics, completely spanning the smallest side of a training image; for
S≫224thecropwillcorrespondtoasmallpartoftheimage,contain ingasmallobjectoranobject
part.
We considertwoapproachesforsettingthetrainingscale S. Theﬁrst istoﬁx S,whichcorresponds
to single-scale training (note that image content within th e sampled crops can still represent multiscale image statistics). In our experiments, we evaluated m odels trained at two ﬁxed scales: S=
256(which has been widely used in the prior art (Krizhevskyet al ., 2012; Zeiler&Fergus, 2013;
Sermanetet al., 2014)) and S= 384. Given a ConvNet conﬁguration,we ﬁrst trained the network
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman