parameters γ(k),β(k)perdimension.
Forconvolutionallayers,we additionallywant the normalization to obey the convolutional property – so that
different elements of the same feature map, at different
locations, are normalized in the same way. To achieve
this, we jointly normalize all the activations in a minibatch, overall locations. In Alg. 1, we let Bbe the set of
all values in a feature map across both the elements of a
mini-batch and spatial locations – so for a mini-batch of
sizemand feature maps of size p×q, we use the effective mini-batch of size m′=|B|=m·pq. We learn a
pair of parameters γ(k)andβ(k)per feature map, rather
than per activation. Alg. 2 is modiﬁed similarly, so that
duringinferencetheBNtransformappliesthesamelinear
transformationtoeachactivationina givenfeaturemap.
3.3 Batch Normalization enables higher
learning rates
In traditional deep networks, too-high learning rate may
result in the gradients that explode or vanish, as well as
getting stuck in poor local minima. Batch Normalization helps address these issues. By normalizing activations throughout the network, it prevents small changes
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy