in which all weights are independent, and there is no sharing. (b) Convolutional layer, in which
a local kernel function is reused multiple times across the input. Shared weights are indicated by
arrows with the same color. (c) Recurrent layer, in which the same function is reused across dierent
processing steps.
neighborhoods, which diminishes with distance, and because the statistics are mostly stationary
across an image (Table 1).
2.1.3 Recurrent layers
A third common building block is a recurrent layer (Elman, 1990), which is implemented over a
sequence of steps. Here, we can view the inputs and hidden states at each processing step as the
entities, and the Markov dependence of one step's hidden state on the previous hidden state and
the current input, as the relations. The rule for combining the entities takes a step's inputs and
hidden state as arguments to update the hidden state. The rule is reused over each step (Figure 1c),
which re
ects the relational inductive bias of temporal invariance (similar to a CNN's translational
invariance in space). For example, the outcome of some physical sequence of events should not
depend on the time of day. RNNs also carry a bias for locality in the sequence via their Markovian
structure (Table 1).
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu