single-scale networks, as well as a multi-scale model D (by ﬁ ne-tuning only the fully-connected
layers rather than all layers). The resulting ensemble of 7 n etworks has 7.3%ILSVRC test error.
After the submission, we considered an ensemble of only two b est-performing multi-scale models
(conﬁgurations D and E), which reduced the test error to 7.0%using dense evaluation and 6.8%
using combined dense and multi-crop evaluation. For refere nce, our best-performingsingle model
achieves7.1%error(modelE, Table5).
4.5 C OMPARISON WITH THE STATE OF THE ART
Finally, we compare our results with the state of the art in Ta ble 7. In the classiﬁcation task of
ILSVRC-2014 challenge (Russakovskyet al., 2014), our “VGG ” team secured the 2nd place with
7
Publishedasa conferencepaperat ICLR2015
Table6:Multiple ConvNetfusion results.
Combined ConvNet modelsError
top-1 val top-5val top-5test
ILSVRCsubmission
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman