−60 −50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0−14−12−10−8−6−4−20
RNN Scores (log)TM Scores (log)
Figure 3: The visualization of phrase pairs according to their scores (log-probabilities) by the RNN
Encoder–Decoder and the translation model.
4.2 Quantitative Analysis
We tried the following combinations:
1. Baseline conﬁguration
2. Baseline + RNN
3. Baseline + CSLM + RNN
4. Baseline + CSLM + RNN + Word penalty
Source Translation Model RNN Encoder–Decoder
at the end of the [a la ﬁn de la] [ ´r la ﬁn des ann ´ees] [ ˆetre supprim ´es`a la ﬁn de la][`a la ﬁn du] [ `a la ﬁn des] [ `a la ﬁn de la]
for the ﬁrst time [rc
pour la premi r¨ere fois] [ ´et´e donn ´es pour
la premi `ere fois] [ ´et´e comm ´emor ´ee pour la
In this paper, we propose a novel neural network model called RNN
Encoder-Decoder that consists of two recurrent neural networks (RNN). One RNN
encodes a sequence of symbols into a fixed-length vector representation, and
the other decodes the representation into another sequence of symbols. The
encoder and decoder of the proposed model are jointly trained to maximize the
conditional probability of a target sequence given a source sequence. The
performance of a statistical machine translation system is empirically found to
improve by using the conditional probabilities of phrase pairs computed by the
RNN Encoder-Decoder as an additional feature in the existing log-linear model.
Qualitatively, we show that the proposed model learns a semantically and
syntactically meaningful representation of linguistic phrases.
Kyunghyun Cho Bart van Merrienboer Caglar Gulcehre Dzmitry Bahdanau Fethi Bougares Holger Schwenk Yoshua Bengio