Relational inductive bias for physical construction in humans and machines. In Proceedings of the
40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society .
Hamrick, J. B., Ballard, A. J., Pascanu, R., Vinyals, O., Heess, N., and Battaglia, P. W. (2017).
Metacontrol for adaptive imagination-based optimization. In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) .
Hartford, J., Graham, D. R., Leyton-Brown, K., and Ravanbakhsh, S. (2018). Deep models of
interactions across sets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02879 .
Hay, N., Stark, M., Schlegel, A., Wendelken, C., Park, D., Purdy, E., Silver, T., Phoenix, D. S.,
and George, D. (2018). Behavior is everything{towards representing concepts with sensorimotor
contingencies. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Articial Intelligence (AAAI) .
Hena, M., Bruna, J., and LeCun, Y. (2015). Deep convolutional networks on graph-structured
data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.05163 .
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu