some pairs of entities possessing a relation and others lacking one. In our solar system example, if
the system instead consists of the planets and their moons, one may be tempted to approximate
it by neglecting the interactions between moons of dierent planets. In practice, this means
computing interactions only between some pairs of objects, i.e. x0
i=f(xi;P
j2(i)g(xi;xj)), where
(i)f1;:::;ngis a neighborhood around node i. This corresponds to a graph, in that the i-th
object only interacts with a subset of the other objects, described by its neighborhood. Note, the
updated states still do not depend in the order in which we describe the neighborhood.5
Graphs, generally, are a representation which supports arbitrary (pairwise) relational structure, and computations over graphs aord a strong relational inductive bias beyond that which
convolutional and recurrent layers can provide.
3 Graph networks
Neural networks that operate on graphs, and structure their computations accordingly, have been
developed and explored extensively for more than a decade under the umbrella of \graph neural
networks" (Gori et al., 2005; Scarselli et al., 2005, 2009a; Li et al., 2016), but have grown rapidly
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu