for each node, mv, are ﬁrst computed by applying spatial
and temporal message passing functions, MsandMtrespectively, to all nodes in its neighbourhood as described in
Eq. (1). An update function, U, then aggregates the received
messages to update the latent state, hv,
mi+1
v=X
w2SvMs(hi
v;hi
w;i
s) +X
u2TvMt(hi
v;hi
u;i
t)(1)
hi+1
v=U(mi+1
v;hi
v); (2)
wheredenotes learnable function parameters. Intuitively,
the state of a node, hv, is updated by aggregating the messages passed from its neighbours. Finally, after I1iterations of message passing, a readout function, R, uses the
updated node features for the classiﬁcation task of interest
y=R(fhi
vgjv2G): (3)
As illustrated in Fig. 2, our graph consists of a set of
“Foreground” nodes, F=ff1;f2;:::;fngand “Context”
Accurate video understanding involves reasoning about the relationships
between actors, objects and their environment, often over long temporal
intervals. In this paper, we propose a message passing graph neural network
that explicitly models these spatio-temporal relations and can use explicit
representations of objects, when supervision is available, and implicit
representations otherwise. Our formulation generalises previous structured
models for video understanding, and allows us to study how different design
choices in graph structure and representation affect the model's performance.
We demonstrate our method on two different tasks requiring relational reasoning
in videos -- spatio-temporal action detection on AVA and UCF101-24, and video
scene graph classification on the recent Action Genome dataset -- and achieve
state-of-the-art results on all three datasets. Furthermore, we show
quantitatively and qualitatively how our method is able to more effectively
model relationships between relevant entities in the scene.
Anurag Arnab Chen Sun Cordelia Schmid