uses complex loss? 7773 3 7
requires recurrent layers? 7373 7 7
model size (in MB) 79 79 961 514 >1000 79
Table 1: Summary of recent semantic segmentation models. For each model, we report whether it requires: (1) CRF
post-processing, (2) complex loss functions, or (3) recurrent layers. We also list the size of the model (using the
size of Caffe [13] models in MB). We note that unlike prior
methods, our RWN does not need post-processing, it is implemented using standard layers and loss functions, and it
also has a compact model.
which are adapted for speciﬁc tasks and datasets, these
models can be quite difﬁcult to adapt for new tasks and
datasets, which is disadvantageous.
Inspired by random walk methods [21, 3, 24], in this
work we introduce a simple, yet effective alternative to traditional FCNs: a Convolutional Random Walk Network
(RWN) that combines the strengths of FCNs and random walk methods. Our model addresses the issues of
(1) poor localization around the boundaries suffered by
FCNs and (2) spatially disjoint segments produced by dense
CRFs. Additionally, unlike recent semantic segmentation
Most current semantic segmentation methods rely on fully convolutional
networks (FCNs). However, their use of large receptive fields and many pooling
layers cause low spatial resolution inside the deep layers. This leads to
predictions with poor localization around the boundaries. Prior work has
attempted to address this issue by post-processing predictions with CRFs or
MRFs. But such models often fail to capture semantic relationships between
objects, which causes spatially disjoint predictions. To overcome these
problems, recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs into an FCN framework. The
downside of these new models is that they have much higher complexity than
traditional FCNs, which renders training and testing more challenging.
  In this work we introduce a simple, yet effective Convolutional Random Walk
Network (RWN) that addresses the issues of poor boundary localization and
spatially fragmented predictions with very little increase in model complexity.
Our proposed RWN jointly optimizes the objectives of pixelwise affinity and
semantic segmentation. It combines these two objectives via a novel random walk
layer that enforces consistent spatial grouping in the deep layers of the
network. Our RWN is implemented using standard convolution and matrix
multiplication. This allows an easy integration into existing FCN frameworks
and it enables end-to-end training of the whole network via standard
back-propagation. Our implementation of RWN requires just $131$ additional
parameters compared to the traditional FCNs, and yet it consistently produces
an improvement over the FCNs on semantic segmentation and scene labeling.
Gedas Bertasius Lorenzo Torresani Stella X. Yu Jianbo Shi