An illustration of our architecture is presented in Figure 2.
Loss Function. As in [ 27], we use a standard pose estimation loss function which computes a mean
squared error between the predicted, and the ground-truth heatmaps. The ground-truth heatmap is
generated by applying a 2D Gaussian around the location of each joint.
Pose Annotation Propagation. During training, we force our model to warp pose heatmap fBfrom
an unlabeled frame B such that it would match the ground-truth pose heatmap in a labeled Frame A.
Afterwards, we can reverse the application direction of our network. This then, allows us to propagate
pose information from manually annotated frames to unlabeled frames (i.e. from a labeled Frame
A to an unlabeled Frame B). Speciﬁcally, given a pose annotation in Frame A, we can generate its
respective ground-truth heatmap yAby applying a 2D Gaussian around the location of each joint
(identically to how it was done in [ 23,27]. Then, we can predict the offsets for warping ground-truth
heatmapyAto an unlabeled Frame B, from the feature difference  B;A=fBfA. Lastly, we
Modern approaches for multi-person pose estimation in video require large
amounts of dense annotations. However, labeling every frame in a video is
costly and labor intensive. To reduce the need for dense annotations, we
propose a PoseWarper network that leverages training videos with sparse
annotations (every k frames) to learn to perform dense temporal pose
propagation and estimation. Given a pair of video frames---a labeled Frame A
and an unlabeled Frame B---we train our model to predict human pose in Frame A
using the features from Frame B by means of deformable convolutions to
implicitly learn the pose warping between A and B. We demonstrate that we can
leverage our trained PoseWarper for several applications. First, at inference
time we can reverse the application direction of our network in order to
propagate pose information from manually annotated frames to unlabeled frames.
This makes it possible to generate pose annotations for the entire video given
only a few manually-labeled frames. Compared to modern label propagation
methods based on optical flow, our warping mechanism is much more compact (6M
vs 39M parameters), and also more accurate (88.7% mAP vs 83.8% mAP). We also
show that we can improve the accuracy of a pose estimator by training it on an
augmented dataset obtained by adding our propagated poses to the original
manual labels. Lastly, we can use our PoseWarper to aggregate temporal pose
information from neighboring frames during inference. This allows our system to
achieve state-of-the-art pose detection results on the PoseTrack2017 and
PoseTrack2018 datasets. Code has been made available at:
https://github.com/facebookresearch/PoseWarper.
Gedas Bertasius Christoph Feichtenhofer Du Tran Jianbo Shi Lorenzo Torresani