fkahe,jiansung@microsoft.com
X. Zhang is with Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China. Email:
xyz.clx@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
S. Ren is with University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,
China. Email: sqren@mail.ustc.edu.cn
This work was done when X. Zhang and S. Ren were interns at Microsoft
Research.
crop warp
spatial pyramid poolingcrop / warp
conv layers image fc layers outputimage conv layers fc layers outputFigure 1: Top: cropping or warping to ﬁt a ﬁxed
size. Middle: a conventional CNN. Bottom: our spatial
pyramid pooling network structure.
may not be suitable when object scales vary. Fixing
input sizes overlooks the issues involving scales.
So why do CNNs require a ﬁxed input size? A CNN
mainly consists of two parts: convolutional layers,
and fully-connected layers that follow. The convolutional layers operate in a sliding-window manner
and output feature maps which represent the spatial
arrangement of the activations (Figure 2). In fact, convolutional layers do not require a ﬁxed image size and
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun