set to 0.1 in their experiments. We experimented with layer normalization for both 1.0 and 0.1 scale
initialization and found that the former model performed signiﬁcantly better. This demonstrates that
layer normalization is not sensitive to the initial scale in the same way that recurrent BN is.3
6.3 Skip-thought vectors
Skip-thoughts [Kiros et al., 2015] is a generalization of the skip-gram model [Mikolov et al., 2013]
for learning unsupervised distributed sentence representations. Given contiguous text, a sentence is
2https://github.com/cooijmanstim/Attentive_reader/tree/bn
3We only produce results on the validation set, as in the case of Cooijmans et al. [2016]
7
5 10 15 20
iteration x 5000082.082.583.083.584.084.585.085.586.0Pearson x 100
Skip-Thoughts + LN
Skip-Thoughts
Original(a) SICK(r)
5 10 15 20
iteration x 500002728293031323334MSE x 100
Skip-Thoughts + LN
Skip-Thoughts
Original (b) SICK(MSE)
5 10 15 20
Training state-of-the-art, deep neural networks is computationally expensive.
One way to reduce the training time is to normalize the activities of the
neurons. A recently introduced technique called batch normalization uses the
distribution of the summed input to a neuron over a mini-batch of training
cases to compute a mean and variance which are then used to normalize the
summed input to that neuron on each training case. This significantly reduces
the training time in feed-forward neural networks. However, the effect of batch
normalization is dependent on the mini-batch size and it is not obvious how to
apply it to recurrent neural networks. In this paper, we transpose batch
normalization into layer normalization by computing the mean and variance used
for normalization from all of the summed inputs to the neurons in a layer on a
single training case. Like batch normalization, we also give each neuron its
own adaptive bias and gain which are applied after the normalization but before
the non-linearity. Unlike batch normalization, layer normalization performs
exactly the same computation at training and test times. It is also
straightforward to apply to recurrent neural networks by computing the
normalization statistics separately at each time step. Layer normalization is
very effective at stabilizing the hidden state dynamics in recurrent networks.
Empirically, we show that layer normalization can substantially reduce the
training time compared with previously published techniques.
Jimmy Lei Ba Jamie Ryan Kiros Geoffrey E. Hinton