“real”imagesbydistortingthemless.
6
5M 10M 15M 20M 25M 30M0.40.50.60.70.8
Inception
BN−Baseline
BN−x5
BN−x30
BN−x5−Sigmoid
Steps to match Inception
Figure 2: Single crop validation accuracy of Inception
and its batch-normalized variants, vs. the number of
trainingsteps.Model Stepsto72.2% Maxaccuracy
Inception 31.0·10672.2%
BN-Baseline 13.3·10672.7%
BN-x5 2.1·10673.0%
BN-x30 2.7·10674.8%
BN-x5-Sigmoid 69.8%
Figure 3: For Inception and the batch-normalized
variants, the number of training steps required to
reach the maximum accuracy of Inception(72.2%),
and the maximum accuracy achieved by the network.
4.2.2 Single-NetworkClassiﬁcation
We evaluated the following networks, all trained on the
LSVRC2012 training data, and tested on the validation
data:
Inception : the network described at the beginning of
Section4.2,trainedwiththeinitiallearningrateof0.001 5.
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy