San Diego", \eat at", and \an Indian restaurant". We draw analogies by aligning the relational
structure between two domains and drawing inferences about one based on corresponding knowledge
about the other (Gentner and Markman, 1997; Hummel and Holyoak, 2003).
Kenneth Craik's \The Nature of Explanation" (1943), connects the compositional structure of
the world to how our internal mental models are organized:
...[a human mental model] has a similar relation-structure to that of the process it
imitates. By `relation-structure' I do not mean some obscure non-physical entity which
attends the model, but the fact that it is a working physical model which works in the
same way as the process it parallels... physical reality is built up, apparently, from a few
fundamental types of units whose properties determine many of the properties of the
most complicated phenomena, and this seems to aord a sucient explanation of the
emergence of analogies between mechanisms and similarities of relation-structure among
these combinations without the necessity of any theory of objective universals. (Craik,
1943, page 51-55)
That is, the world is compositional, or at least, we understand it in compositional terms. When
learning, we either t new knowledge into our existing structured representations, or adjust the
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu