Normalized distance to true jointDetection rate
  
DeepPose − initial stage 1DeepPose − stage 2DeepPose − stage 3
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.40.10.30.50.70.9Elbows
Normalized distance to true jointDetection rateFigure 5. Percent of detected joints (PDJ) on FLIC or the ﬁrst three
stages of the DNN cascade. We present results over larger spectrum of normalized distances between prediction and ground truth.
procedure are at high-precision regime of at normalized distances of [0:15;0:2]. Further, the major gains are achieved
after one stage of reﬁnement. The reason being that subsequent stages end up using smaller sub-images around each
joint. And although the subsequent stages look at higher
resolution inputs, they have more limited context.
Examples of cases, where reﬁnement helps, are visualized in Fig. 6. The initial stage is usually successful at estimating a roughly correct pose, however, this pose is not
”snapped” to the correct one. For example, in row three the
pose has the right shape but incorrect scale. In the second
row, the predicted pose is translated north from the ideal
We propose a method for human pose estimation based on Deep Neural Networks
(DNNs). The pose estimation is formulated as a DNN-based regression problem
towards body joints. We present a cascade of such DNN regressors which results
in high precision pose estimates. The approach has the advantage of reasoning
about pose in a holistic fashion and has a simple but yet powerful formulation
which capitalizes on recent advances in Deep Learning. We present a detailed
empirical analysis with state-of-art or better performance on four academic
benchmarks of diverse real-world images.
Alexander Toshev Christian Szegedy