our method as ensembling, because the members to be aggregated are trained jointly, not independently.
3. Method
3.1. Template
We adopt a highly modularized design following
VGG/ResNets. Our network consists of a stack of residstage output ResNet-50 ResNeXt-50 (32 4d)
conv1 112112 77, 64, stride 2 77, 64, stride 2
conv2 565633 max pool, stride 2 33 max pool, stride 22
6411, 64
33, 64
11, 2563
7532
6411, 128
33, 128, C=32
11, 2563
753
conv3 28282
6411, 128
33, 128
11, 5123
7542
6411, 256
33, 256, C=32
11, 5123
754
conv4 14142
6411, 256
33, 256
11, 10243
7562
6411, 512
33, 512, C=32
11, 10243
756
conv5 772
6411, 512
33, 512
We present a simple, highly modularized network architecture for image
classification. Our network is constructed by repeating a building block that
aggregates a set of transformations with the same topology. Our simple design
results in a homogeneous, multi-branch architecture that has only a few
hyper-parameters to set. This strategy exposes a new dimension, which we call
"cardinality" (the size of the set of transformations), as an essential factor
in addition to the dimensions of depth and width. On the ImageNet-1K dataset,
we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining
complexity, increasing cardinality is able to improve classification accuracy.
Moreover, increasing cardinality is more effective than going deeper or wider
when we increase the capacity. Our models, named ResNeXt, are the foundations
of our entry to the ILSVRC 2016 classification task in which we secured 2nd
place. We further investigate ResNeXt on an ImageNet-5K set and the COCO
detection set, also showing better results than its ResNet counterpart. The
code and models are publicly available online.
Saining Xie Ross Girshick Piotr Dollár Zhuowen Tu Kaiming He