tothe ILSVRC-2014competition(Russakovskyet al., 2014).
4.1 SINGLESCALEEVALUATION
We begin with evaluating the performanceof individual Conv Net models at a single scale with the
layerconﬁgurationsdescribedin Sect. 2.2. The test images ize was set as follows: Q=Sforﬁxed
S,andQ= 0.5(Smin+Smax)forjittered S∈[Smin,Smax]. Theresultsofareshownin Table3.
First, we note that using local response normalisation (A-L RN network) does not improve on the
model A without any normalisation layers. We thus do not empl oy normalisation in the deeper
architectures(B–E).
Second, we observe that the classiﬁcation error decreases w ith the increased ConvNet depth: from
11 layers in A to 19 layers in E. Notably, in spite of the same de pth, the conﬁguration C (which
containsthree 1×1conv.layers),performsworsethantheconﬁgurationD,whic huses3×3conv.
layersthroughoutthenetwork. Thisindicatesthatwhileth e additionalnon-linearitydoeshelp(Cis
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman