[15] S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce, “Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene
categories,” in CVPR , 2006.
[16] J. Sivic and A. Zisserman, “Video google: a text retrieval
approach to object matching in videos,” in ICCV , 2003.
[17] J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, and T. Huang, “Linear spatial pyramid
matching using sparse coding for image classiﬁcation,” in
CVPR , 2009.
[18] J. Wang, J. Yang, K. Yu, F. Lv, T. Huang, and Y. Gong, “Localityconstrained linear coding for image classiﬁcation,” in CVPR ,
2010.
[19] F. Perronnin, J. S ´anchez, and T. Mensink, “Improving the ﬁsher
kernel for large-scale image classiﬁcation,” in ECCV , 2010.
[20] K. E. van de Sande, J. R. Uijlings, T. Gevers, and A. W. Smeulders, “Segmentation as selective search for object recognition,”
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun