2013.
[6] A. V . K. Chatﬁeld, K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Return of
the devil in the details: Delving deep into convolutional nets,”
inArXiv:1405.3531 , 2014.
[7] R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, “Rich feature
hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation,” in CVPR , 2014.
[8] W. Y. Zou, X. Wang, M. Sun, and Y. Lin, “Generic object detection with dense neural patterns and regionlets,” in
ArXiv:1404.4316 , 2014.
[9] A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson, “Cnn
features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recogniton,”
inCVPR 2014, DeepVision Workshop , 2014.
[10] Y. Taigman, M. Yang, M. Ranzato, and L. Wolf, “Deepface:
Closing the gap to human-level performance in face veriﬁcation,” in CVPR , 2014.
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun