settings, we study pose detection performance as a function of 1) number of sparsely-labeled training
videos (with 1manually-labeled frame per video), and 2) number of labeled frames per video (with
50sparsely-labeled videos in total). All baselines are based on retraining the standard HRNet [ 27]
model on the different training sets. The "GT (1x)" baseline is trained in a standard way on sparsely
labeled video data. The "GT (7x)" baseline uses 7x more manually annotated data relative to the
"GT (1x)" baseline. Our approach on the left subﬁgure ("GT (1x) + pGT (6x)"), augments the
original sparsely labeled video data with our propagated pose pseudo labels ( 6nearby frames for
every manually-labeled frame). Lastly, in b) "GT (1x) + T-Agg" denotes the use of PoseWarper to
fuse pose information from multiple neighboring frames during inference (training is done as in "GT
(1x)" baseline). From the results, we observe that both application modalities of PoseWarper provide
an effective way to achieve strong pose accuracy while reducing the number of manual annotations.
ankle” detection from the labeled frame in time t to the unlabeled frame in time t+1. The third frame
Modern approaches for multi-person pose estimation in video require large
amounts of dense annotations. However, labeling every frame in a video is
costly and labor intensive. To reduce the need for dense annotations, we
propose a PoseWarper network that leverages training videos with sparse
annotations (every k frames) to learn to perform dense temporal pose
propagation and estimation. Given a pair of video frames---a labeled Frame A
and an unlabeled Frame B---we train our model to predict human pose in Frame A
using the features from Frame B by means of deformable convolutions to
implicitly learn the pose warping between A and B. We demonstrate that we can
leverage our trained PoseWarper for several applications. First, at inference
time we can reverse the application direction of our network in order to
propagate pose information from manually annotated frames to unlabeled frames.
This makes it possible to generate pose annotations for the entire video given
only a few manually-labeled frames. Compared to modern label propagation
methods based on optical flow, our warping mechanism is much more compact (6M
vs 39M parameters), and also more accurate (88.7% mAP vs 83.8% mAP). We also
show that we can improve the accuracy of a pose estimator by training it on an
augmented dataset obtained by adding our propagated poses to the original
manual labels. Lastly, we can use our PoseWarper to aggregate temporal pose
information from neighboring frames during inference. This allows our system to
achieve state-of-the-art pose detection results on the PoseTrack2017 and
PoseTrack2018 datasets. Code has been made available at:
https://github.com/facebookresearch/PoseWarper.
Gedas Bertasius Christoph Feichtenhofer Du Tran Jianbo Shi Lorenzo Torresani