Based on this ﬁgure, it appears that different offset maps encode different motions rather than all
predicting the same solution (say, the optical ﬂow between the two frames). This makes sense, as the
network may decide to ignore motions of uninformative regions, and instead capture the motion of
different human body parts in different offset maps (say, a hand as opposed to the head). We also note
that the magnitudes of our learned offsets encode salient human motion (see Column 5 of Figure 5).
Lastly, to verify that our learned offsets encode human motion, for each point pndenoting a body joint,
we extract our predicted offsets and train a linear classiﬁer to regress the ground truth (x;y)motion
displacement of this body joint. In Column 7 of Figure 5, we visualize our predicted motion outputs
for every pixel. We show Farneback’s optical ﬂow in Column 6. Note that in regions containing
people, our predicted human motion matches Farneback optical ﬂow. Furthermore, we point out that
compared to the standard Farneback optical ﬂow, our motion ﬁelds look less noisy.
5 Conclusions
In this work, we introduced PoseWarper, a novel architecture for pose detection in sparsely labeled
Modern approaches for multi-person pose estimation in video require large
amounts of dense annotations. However, labeling every frame in a video is
costly and labor intensive. To reduce the need for dense annotations, we
propose a PoseWarper network that leverages training videos with sparse
annotations (every k frames) to learn to perform dense temporal pose
propagation and estimation. Given a pair of video frames---a labeled Frame A
and an unlabeled Frame B---we train our model to predict human pose in Frame A
using the features from Frame B by means of deformable convolutions to
implicitly learn the pose warping between A and B. We demonstrate that we can
leverage our trained PoseWarper for several applications. First, at inference
time we can reverse the application direction of our network in order to
propagate pose information from manually annotated frames to unlabeled frames.
This makes it possible to generate pose annotations for the entire video given
only a few manually-labeled frames. Compared to modern label propagation
methods based on optical flow, our warping mechanism is much more compact (6M
vs 39M parameters), and also more accurate (88.7% mAP vs 83.8% mAP). We also
show that we can improve the accuracy of a pose estimator by training it on an
augmented dataset obtained by adding our propagated poses to the original
manual labels. Lastly, we can use our PoseWarper to aggregate temporal pose
information from neighboring frames during inference. This allows our system to
achieve state-of-the-art pose detection results on the PoseTrack2017 and
PoseTrack2018 datasets. Code has been made available at:
https://github.com/facebookresearch/PoseWarper.
Gedas Bertasius Christoph Feichtenhofer Du Tran Jianbo Shi Lorenzo Torresani