Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP
Su Lin Blodgett
College of Information and Computer Sciences
University of Massachusetts Amherst
blodgett@cs.umass.eduSolon Barocas
Microsoft Research
Cornell University
solon@microsoft.com
Hal Daumé III
Microsoft Research
University of Maryland
me@hal3.nameHanna Wallach
Microsoft Research
wallach@microsoft.com
Abstract
We survey 146 papers analyzing “bias” in
NLP systems, ﬁnding that their motivations
are often vague, inconsistent, and lacking
in normative reasoning, despite the fact that
analyzing “bias” is an inherently normative
process. We further ﬁnd that these papers’
proposed quantitative techniques for measuring or mitigating “bias” are poorly matched to
their motivations and do not engage with the
relevant literature outside of NLP. Based on
these ﬁndings, we describe the beginnings of a
path forward by proposing three recommendations that should guide work analyzing “bias”
in NLP systems. These recommendations rest
on a greater recognition of the relationships
between language and social hierarchies,
encouraging researchers and practitioners
to articulate their conceptualizations of
We survey 146 papers analyzing "bias" in NLP systems, finding that their
motivations are often vague, inconsistent, and lacking in normative reasoning,
despite the fact that analyzing "bias" is an inherently normative process. We
further find that these papers' proposed quantitative techniques for measuring
or mitigating "bias" are poorly matched to their motivations and do not engage
with the relevant literature outside of NLP. Based on these findings, we
describe the beginnings of a path forward by proposing three recommendations
that should guide work analyzing "bias" in NLP systems. These recommendations
rest on a greater recognition of the relationships between language and social
hierarchies, encouraging researchers and practitioners to articulate their
conceptualizations of "bias"---i.e., what kinds of system behaviors are
harmful, in what ways, to whom, and why, as well as the normative reasoning
underlying these statements---and to center work around the lived experiences
of members of communities affected by NLP systems, while interrogating and
reimagining the power relations between technologists and such communities.
Su Lin Blodgett Solon Barocas Hal Daumé III Hanna Wallach