[2] Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton.
Layer normalization. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 ,
2016. 5
[3] Fabien Baradel, Natalia Neverova, Christian Wolf, Julien
Mille, and Greg Mori. Object level visual reasoning in
videos. In ECCV , 2018. 1, 2, 4, 8
[4] Peter Battaglia, Razvan Pascanu, Matthew Lai, and
Danilo Jimenez Rezende. Interaction networks for learning
about objects, relations and physics. In NeurIPS , 2016. 3, 4,
5
[5] Peter W Battaglia, Jessica B Hamrick, Victor Bapst, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Vinicius Zambaldi, Mateusz Malinowski, Andrea Tacchetti, David Raposo, Adam Santoro, Ryan Faulkner, et al. Relational inductive biases,
deep learning, and graph networks. In arXiv preprint
arXiv:1806.01261 , 2018. 2, 3, 5
[6] Joao Carreira and Andrew Zisserman. Quo vadis, action
recognition? a new model and the kinetics dataset. In CVPR ,
2017. 2
Accurate video understanding involves reasoning about the relationships
between actors, objects and their environment, often over long temporal
intervals. In this paper, we propose a message passing graph neural network
that explicitly models these spatio-temporal relations and can use explicit
representations of objects, when supervision is available, and implicit
representations otherwise. Our formulation generalises previous structured
models for video understanding, and allows us to study how different design
choices in graph structure and representation affect the model's performance.
We demonstrate our method on two different tasks requiring relational reasoning
in videos -- spatio-temporal action detection on AVA and UCF101-24, and video
scene graph classification on the recent Action Genome dataset -- and achieve
state-of-the-art results on all three datasets. Furthermore, we show
quantitatively and qualitatively how our method is able to more effectively
model relationships between relevant entities in the scene.
Anurag Arnab Chen Sun Cordelia Schmid