Inception reached the accuracy of 72.2% after 31·106
training steps. The Figure 3 shows, for each network,
the number of training steps required to reach the same
72.2%accuracy,aswellasthemaximumvalidationaccuracy reached by the network and the number of steps to
reachit.
By onlyusingBatch Normalization( BN-Baseline ),we
matchtheaccuracyofInceptioninlessthanhalfthenumber of training steps. By applying the modiﬁcations in
Sec. 4.2.1, we signiﬁcantly increase the training speed of
the network. BN-x5needs 14 times fewer steps than Inception to reach the 72.2% accuracy. Interestingly, increasing the learning rate further ( BN-x30) causes the
model to train somewhat slowerinitially, but allows it to
reachahigherﬁnalaccuracy. Itreaches74.8%after 6·106
steps, i.e. 5 times fewer steps than required by Inception
toreach72.2%.
We also veriﬁed that the reduction in internal covariate shift allows deep networks with Batch Normalizationto be trained when sigmoid is used as the nonlinearity,
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy