of the ILSVRC-2013winnerOverfeat(Sermanetet al., 2014), even thoughwe used less scales and
did not employ their resolution enhancement technique. We e nvisage that better localisation performance can be achieved if this technique is incorporated i nto our method. This indicates the
performanceadvancementbroughtbyourverydeepConvNets– wegotbetterresultswithasimpler
localisationmethod,buta morepowerfulrepresentation.
B GENERALISATION OF VERYDEEPFEATURES
In the previous sections we have discussed training and eval uation of very deep ConvNets on the
ILSVRC dataset. In this section, we evaluate our ConvNets, p re-trained on ILSVRC, as feature
11
Publishedasa conferencepaperat ICLR2015
Table 10: Comparison with the state of the art in ILSVRC localisation . Our methodis denoted
as“VGG”.
Method top-5val. error (%) top-5 testerror (%)
VGG 26.9 25.3
GoogLeNet (Szegedyet al., 2014) - 26.7
OverFeat (Sermanet etal.,2014) 30.0 29.9
Krizhevsky et al.(Krizhevsky et al.,2012) - 34.2
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman