conclude that our higher order detection potentials are an integral part of our system.
4.3 Comparison to other current methods
In Table 2, we compare our methods to other approaches that have been evaluated on the
same dataset and reported APrresults at multiple IoU thresholds. The SDS method of [13]
was evaluated on the VOC Validation set by [4]. Our approach signiﬁcantly outperforms
ARNAB AND TORR: BOTTOM-UP INSTANCE SEGMENTATION 9
Table 2: Comparison of instance segmentation performance to other methods on the VOC
2012 Validation Set. We report the APrmeasure at ﬁve different IoU thresholds.
Method APrat 0.5 APrat 0.6 APrat 0.7 APrat 0.8 APrat 0.9 APr
vol
SDS [13] 43.8 34.5 21.3 8.7 0.9 Chen et al. [4] 46.3 38.2 27.0 13.5 2.6 PFN [24] 58.7 51.3 42.5 31.2 15.7 52.3
Ours 58.3 52.4 45.4 34.9 20.1 53.1
both [13] and [4] which initially perform object detection, and reﬁne these detections into an
Traditional Scene Understanding problems such as Object Detection and
Semantic Segmentation have made breakthroughs in recent years due to the
adoption of deep learning. However, the former task is not able to localise
objects at a pixel level, and the latter task has no notion of different
instances of objects of the same class. We focus on the task of Instance
Segmentation which recognises and localises objects down to a pixel level. Our
model is based on a deep neural network trained for semantic segmentation. This
network incorporates a Conditional Random Field with end-to-end trainable
higher order potentials based on object detector outputs. This allows us to
reason about instances from an initial, category-level semantic segmentation.
Our simple method effectively leverages the great progress recently made in
semantic segmentation and object detection. The accurate instance-level
segmentations that our network produces is reflected by the considerable
improvements obtained over previous work.
Anurag Arnab Philip H. S. Torr