note that we use this prediction scheme only during testing. During training we employ a scheme that uses a single
random walk step (but with a much larger radius), which is
faster. We explain this procedure in the next subsection.
4.5. Implementation Details
We jointly train our RWN in an end-to-end fashion for
2000 iterations, with a learning rate of 105,0:9momentum, the weight decay of 5105, and 15samples per batch.
For the RWN model, we set the tradeoff parameter to
0:01. During testing we set the random walk connectivity
radiusR= 5 and apply the random walk procedure until convergence. However, during training we set R= 40 ,
and apply a single random walk step. This training strategy
works well because increasing the radius size eliminates the
need for multiple random walk steps, which speeds up the
training. However, using R= 5 and applying an inﬁnite
number of random walk steps until convergence still yields
slightly better results (see study in 5.4), so we use it during testing. For all of our experiments, we use a Caffe library [13]. During training, we also employ data augmentation techniques such as cropping, and mirroring.
5. Experimental Results
Most current semantic segmentation methods rely on fully convolutional
networks (FCNs). However, their use of large receptive fields and many pooling
layers cause low spatial resolution inside the deep layers. This leads to
predictions with poor localization around the boundaries. Prior work has
attempted to address this issue by post-processing predictions with CRFs or
MRFs. But such models often fail to capture semantic relationships between
objects, which causes spatially disjoint predictions. To overcome these
problems, recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs into an FCN framework. The
downside of these new models is that they have much higher complexity than
traditional FCNs, which renders training and testing more challenging.
  In this work we introduce a simple, yet effective Convolutional Random Walk
Network (RWN) that addresses the issues of poor boundary localization and
spatially fragmented predictions with very little increase in model complexity.
Our proposed RWN jointly optimizes the objectives of pixelwise affinity and
semantic segmentation. It combines these two objectives via a novel random walk
layer that enforces consistent spatial grouping in the deep layers of the
network. Our RWN is implemented using standard convolution and matrix
multiplication. This allows an easy integration into existing FCN frameworks
and it enables end-to-end training of the whole network via standard
back-propagation. Our implementation of RWN requires just $131$ additional
parameters compared to the traditional FCNs, and yet it consistently produces
an improvement over the FCNs on semantic segmentation and scene labeling.
Gedas Bertasius Lorenzo Torresani Stella X. Yu Jianbo Shi