theresultswith S= 256exhibitthesamebehaviourandarenotshownforbrevity.
Table 8:Localisation error for different modiﬁcations with the simpliﬁed testing protocol: the
boundingbox is predictedfrom a single central image crop, a nd the ground-truthclass is used. All
ConvNet layers (except for the last one) have the conﬁgurati on D (Table 1), while the last layer
performseithersingle-classregression(SCR) orper-clas sregression(PCR).
Fine-tunedlayers regression type GTclass localisationerror
1st and2nd FCSCR 36.4
PCR 34.3
all PCR 33.1
Fully-ﬂedgedevaluation. Havingdeterminedthebestlocalisationsetting(PCR,ﬁne- tuningofall
layers),we nowapply it in the fully-ﬂedgedscenario,where the top-5class labelsare predictedusing our best-performingclassiﬁcation system (Sect. 4.5), and multiple densely-computedbounding
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman