We also veriﬁed that the reduction in internal covariate shift allows deep networks with Batch Normalizationto be trained when sigmoid is used as the nonlinearity,
despite the well-known difﬁculty of training such networks. Indeed, BN-x5-Sigmoid achieves the accuracy of
69.8%. WithoutBatchNormalization,Inceptionwithsigmoidneverachievesbetterthan 1/1000accuracy.
4.2.3 Ensemble Classiﬁcation
The current reported best results on the ImageNet Large
Scale Visual RecognitionCompetitionare reachedby the
Deep Image ensemble of traditional models (Wuet al.,
2015) and the ensemble model of (Heet al., 2015). The
latterreportsthetop-5errorof4.94%,asevaluatedbythe
ILSVRCserver. Herewereportatop-5validationerrorof
4.9%, and test error of 4.82% (according to the ILSVRC
server). This improvesupon the previousbest result, and
exceedstheestimatedaccuracyofhumanratersaccording
to(Russakovskyet al.,2014).
Forourensemble,weused6networks. Eachwasbased
onBN-x30,modiﬁedviasomeofthefollowing: increased
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the
distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters
of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower
learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously
hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this
phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing
layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of
the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training
mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and
be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some
cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image
classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14
times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant
margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the
best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5
validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Sergey Ioffe Christian Szegedy