Here we use \graph" to mean a directed, attributed multi-graph with a global attribute. In our
terminology, a node is denoted as vi, an edge as ek, and the global attributes as u. We also use
skandrkto indicate the indices of the sender and receiver nodes (see below), respectively, for
edgek. To be more precise, we dene these terms as:
Directed : one-way edges, from a \sender" node to a \receiver" node.
Attribute : properties that can be encoded as a vector, set, or even another graph.
Attributed : edges and vertices have attributes associated with them.
Global attribute : a graph-level attribute.
Multi-graph : there can be more than one edge between vertices, including self-edges.
Figure 2 shows a variety of dierent types of graphs corresponding to real data that we may be
interested in modeling, including physical systems, molecules, images, and text.
which takes a graph as input, performs computations over the structure, and returns a graph as
output. As described in Box 3, entities are represented by the graph's nodes , relations by the edges ,
and system-level properties by global attributes. The GN framework's block organization emphasizes
customizability and synthesizing new architectures which express desired relational inductive biases.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu