pixel
acc.mean
acc.mean
IUf.w.
IU
FCN-32s-ﬁxed 83.0 59.7 45.4 72.0
FCN-32s 89.1 73.3 59.4 81.4
FCN-16s 90.0 75.7 62.4 83.0
FCN-8s 90.3 75.9 62.7 83.2
a minor additional improvement to 62.7 mean IU, and ﬁnd
a slight improvement in the smoothness and detail of our
output. At this point our fusion improvements have met diminishing returns, both with respect to the IU metric which
emphasizes large-scale correctness, and also in terms of the
improvement visible e.g. in Figure 4, so we do not continue
fusing even lower layers.
Reﬁnement by other means Decreasing the stride of
pooling layers is the most straightforward way to obtain
ﬁner predictions. However, doing so is problematic for our
VGG16-based net. Setting the pool5 layer to have stride 1
requires our convolutionalized fc6 to have a kernel size of1414in order to maintain its receptive ﬁeld size. In addition to their computational cost, we had difﬁculty learning
Convolutional networks are powerful visual models that yield hierarchies of
features. We show that convolutional networks by themselves, trained
end-to-end, pixels-to-pixels, exceed the state-of-the-art in semantic
segmentation. Our key insight is to build "fully convolutional" networks that
take input of arbitrary size and produce correspondingly-sized output with
efficient inference and learning. We define and detail the space of fully
convolutional networks, explain their application to spatially dense prediction
tasks, and draw connections to prior models. We adapt contemporary
classification networks (AlexNet, the VGG net, and GoogLeNet) into fully
convolutional networks and transfer their learned representations by
fine-tuning to the segmentation task. We then define a novel architecture that
combines semantic information from a deep, coarse layer with appearance
information from a shallow, fine layer to produce accurate and detailed
segmentations. Our fully convolutional network achieves state-of-the-art
segmentation of PASCAL VOC (20% relative improvement to 62.2% mean IU on 2012),
NYUDv2, and SIFT Flow, while inference takes one third of a second for a
typical image.
Jonathan Long Evan Shelhamer Trevor Darrell