2018), investing more heavily in meta-learning (Wang et al., 2016, 2018a; Finn et al., 2017), and
exploring multi-agent learning and interaction as a key catalyst for advanced intelligence (Nowak,
2006; Ohtsuki et al., 2006). These directions each involve rich notions of entities, relations, and
combinatorial generalization, and can potentially benet, and benet from, greater interaction with
approaches for learning relational reasoning over explicitly structured representations.
Acknowledgements
We thank Tobias Pfa, Danilo Rezende, Nando de Freitas, Murray Shanahan, Thore Graepel, John
Jumper, Demis Hassabis, and the broader DeepMind and Google communities for valuable feedback
and support.
References
Allamanis, M., Brockschmidt, M., and Khademi, M. (2018). Learning to represent programs with
graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) .
Allamanis, M., Chanthirasegaran, P., Kohli, P., and Sutton, C. (2017). Learning continuous
semantic representations of symbolic expressions. In Proceedings of the International Conference
on Machine Learning (ICML) .
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review , 89(4):369.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu