Goodman et al., 2015).
5.3 Open questions
Although we are excited about the potential impacts that graph networks can have, we caution that
these models are only one step forward. Realizing the full potential of graph networks will likely be
far more challenging than organizing their behavior under one framework, and indeed, there are a
number of unanswered questions regarding the best ways to use graph networks.
One pressing question is: where do the graphs come from that graph networks operate over?
One of the hallmarks of deep learning has been its ability to perform complex computations over
raw sensory data, such as images and text, yet it is unclear the best ways to convert sensory data
into more structured representations like graphs. One approach (which we have already discussed)
assumes a fully connected graph structure between spatial or linguistic entities, such as in the
literature on self-attention (Vaswani et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018c). However, such representations
may not correspond exactly to the \true" entities (e.g., convolutional features do not directly
correspond to objects in a scene). Moreover, many underlying graph structures are much more
sparse than a fully connected graph, and it is an open question how to induce this sparsity. Several
lines of active research are exploring these issues (Watters et al., 2017; van Steenkiste et al., 2018;
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu