sheep:1.52
chair:0.21
diningtable:0.78person:1.16pers on:1.05
pottedplant:0.21chair:4.79pottedplant:0.73
c hair: 0. 33diningtable: 0.34
chair:0.89
bus:0.56
car:3.24
ca r:3.4 5pers on:1.52
train:0.31
train:1.62
pottedplant:0.33
pottedplant:0.78
sofa:0.55tvmonitor:1.77
aeroplane: 0.45
aeroplane:1.40aeroplane:1.01
aeroplane:0.94aeroplane:0.93
aeroplane:0.91aeroplane:0.79
aeroplane:0.57 aeroplane:0.54
person:0.93
person:0.68
horse:1.73pers on:1.91
boat:0.60pers on:3.20
car:2.52
bus:2.01
car:0.93per son:4.16person:0.79
pers on:0.32
hors e:1.68
hors e:0.61
horse:1.29
Existing deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) require a fixed-size
(e.g., 224x224) input image. This requirement is "artificial" and may reduce
the recognition accuracy for the images or sub-images of an arbitrary
size/scale. In this work, we equip the networks with another pooling strategy,
"spatial pyramid pooling", to eliminate the above requirement. The new network
structure, called SPP-net, can generate a fixed-length representation
regardless of image size/scale. Pyramid pooling is also robust to object
deformations. With these advantages, SPP-net should in general improve all
CNN-based image classification methods. On the ImageNet 2012 dataset, we
demonstrate that SPP-net boosts the accuracy of a variety of CNN architectures
despite their different designs. On the Pascal VOC 2007 and Caltech101
datasets, SPP-net achieves state-of-the-art classification results using a
single full-image representation and no fine-tuning.
  The power of SPP-net is also significant in object detection. Using SPP-net,
we compute the feature maps from the entire image only once, and then pool
features in arbitrary regions (sub-images) to generate fixed-length
representations for training the detectors. This method avoids repeatedly
computing the convolutional features. In processing test images, our method is
24-102x faster than the R-CNN method, while achieving better or comparable
accuracy on Pascal VOC 2007.
  In ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2014, our
methods rank #2 in object detection and #3 in image classification among all 38
teams. This manuscript also introduces the improvement made for this
competition.
Kaiming He Xiangyu Zhang Shaoqing Ren Jian Sun