warp the manually-labeled pose in each labeled frame to its three preceding and three subsequent
frames. We also include a more advanced optical ﬂow propagation baseline that uses FlowNet2
optical ﬂow [29]. Finally, we evaluate our PoseWarper model.
In Table 1, we present our quantitative results for video pose propagation. The evaluation is done
using an mAP metric as in [ 42]. Our best model achieves a 88:7%mAP, while the optical ﬂow
propagation baseline using FlowNet2 [ 29] yields an accuracy of 83:8%mAP. We also note that
compared to the FlowNet2 [ 29] propagation baseline, our PoseWarper warping mechanism is not
only more accurate, but also signiﬁcantly more compact ( 6M vs 39M parameters).
Ablation Studies on Dilated Convolution. In Table 1, we also present the results investigating the
effect of different levels of dilated convolutions in our PoseWarper architecture. We evaluate all these
variants on the task of video pose propagation. First, we report that removing dilated convolution
blocks from the original architecture reduces the accuracy from 88:7mAP to 87:2mAP. We also
note that a network with a single dilated convolution (using a dilation rate of 3) yields 87:0mAP.
Modern approaches for multi-person pose estimation in video require large
amounts of dense annotations. However, labeling every frame in a video is
costly and labor intensive. To reduce the need for dense annotations, we
propose a PoseWarper network that leverages training videos with sparse
annotations (every k frames) to learn to perform dense temporal pose
propagation and estimation. Given a pair of video frames---a labeled Frame A
and an unlabeled Frame B---we train our model to predict human pose in Frame A
using the features from Frame B by means of deformable convolutions to
implicitly learn the pose warping between A and B. We demonstrate that we can
leverage our trained PoseWarper for several applications. First, at inference
time we can reverse the application direction of our network in order to
propagate pose information from manually annotated frames to unlabeled frames.
This makes it possible to generate pose annotations for the entire video given
only a few manually-labeled frames. Compared to modern label propagation
methods based on optical flow, our warping mechanism is much more compact (6M
vs 39M parameters), and also more accurate (88.7% mAP vs 83.8% mAP). We also
show that we can improve the accuracy of a pose estimator by training it on an
augmented dataset obtained by adding our propagated poses to the original
manual labels. Lastly, we can use our PoseWarper to aggregate temporal pose
information from neighboring frames during inference. This allows our system to
achieve state-of-the-art pose detection results on the PoseTrack2017 and
PoseTrack2018 datasets. Code has been made available at:
https://github.com/facebookresearch/PoseWarper.
Gedas Bertasius Christoph Feichtenhofer Du Tran Jianbo Shi Lorenzo Torresani