S1= (IA)1(4)
Thus, our ﬁnal prediction equation, which corresponds
to applying repeated random walk steps until convergence,
can be written as
^y1= (IA)1f (5)
Input
 DeepLab_v2-CRF
 RWN_v2
Figure 4: Comparison of segmentation results produced by
our RWN versus the DeepLab-v2-CRF system. It can be noticed that, despite not using any post-processing steps, our
RWN predicts ﬁne object details (e.g., bike wheels or plane
wings) more accurately than DeepLab-v2-CRF, which fails
to capture some these object parts.
In practice, the random walk transition matrix Ais pretty
large, and inverting it is impractical. To deal with this problem, we shrink the matrix (IA)using a simple and efﬁcient technique presented in [1], and then invert it to compute the ﬁnal segmentation. In the experimental section, we
show that such a prediction scheme produces solid results
and is still pretty efﬁcient ( 1 second per image). We also
note that we use this prediction scheme only during testing. During training we employ a scheme that uses a single
Most current semantic segmentation methods rely on fully convolutional
networks (FCNs). However, their use of large receptive fields and many pooling
layers cause low spatial resolution inside the deep layers. This leads to
predictions with poor localization around the boundaries. Prior work has
attempted to address this issue by post-processing predictions with CRFs or
MRFs. But such models often fail to capture semantic relationships between
objects, which causes spatially disjoint predictions. To overcome these
problems, recent methods integrated CRFs or MRFs into an FCN framework. The
downside of these new models is that they have much higher complexity than
traditional FCNs, which renders training and testing more challenging.
  In this work we introduce a simple, yet effective Convolutional Random Walk
Network (RWN) that addresses the issues of poor boundary localization and
spatially fragmented predictions with very little increase in model complexity.
Our proposed RWN jointly optimizes the objectives of pixelwise affinity and
semantic segmentation. It combines these two objectives via a novel random walk
layer that enforces consistent spatial grouping in the deep layers of the
network. Our RWN is implemented using standard convolution and matrix
multiplication. This allows an easy integration into existing FCN frameworks
and it enables end-to-end training of the whole network via standard
back-propagation. Our implementation of RWN requires just $131$ additional
parameters compared to the traditional FCNs, and yet it consistently produces
an improvement over the FCNs on semantic segmentation and scene labeling.
Gedas Bertasius Lorenzo Torresani Stella X. Yu Jianbo Shi