(a) Spatial message passing functions
SGCls PredCls
R@20 R@50 R@10 R@20
Baseline 48.9 51.3 78.7 93.8
Non-local in backbone 49.1 51.4 78.8 93.9
Non-local 50.4 52.6 79.3 94.2
GAT 51.1 53.2 79.7 94.4
GAT + Non-local 51.3 53.4 79.4 94.3(b) Temporal message passing
Temporal parameters SGCls PredCls
cs R@20 R@50 R@10 R@20
1 1 51.1 53.2 79.7 94.4
3 2 52.9 55.0 79.4 94.2
3 5 53.3 55.5 79.4 94.2
3 7 53.5 55.7 79.3 94.2
5 2 53.4 55.5 79.4 94.2
5 5 53.8 56.0 79.3 94.2
5 7 53.6 55.8 79.3 94.2(c) Message passing iterations
Iterations R@20
1 51.1
2 51.6
3 51.6
5 51.8
Spatio-temporal action recognition We evaluate on
Accurate video understanding involves reasoning about the relationships
between actors, objects and their environment, often over long temporal
intervals. In this paper, we propose a message passing graph neural network
that explicitly models these spatio-temporal relations and can use explicit
representations of objects, when supervision is available, and implicit
representations otherwise. Our formulation generalises previous structured
models for video understanding, and allows us to study how different design
choices in graph structure and representation affect the model's performance.
We demonstrate our method on two different tasks requiring relational reasoning
in videos -- spatio-temporal action detection on AVA and UCF101-24, and video
scene graph classification on the recent Action Genome dataset -- and achieve
state-of-the-art results on all three datasets. Furthermore, we show
quantitatively and qualitatively how our method is able to more effectively
model relationships between relevant entities in the scene.
Anurag Arnab Chen Sun Cordelia Schmid