33, 512, C=32
11, 10243
756
conv5 772
6411, 512
33, 512
11, 20483
7532
6411, 1024
33, 1024, C=32
11, 20483
753
11global average pool global average pool
1000-d fc, softmax 1000-d fc, softmax
# params. 25.510625.0106
FLOPs 4.11094.2109
Table 1. ( Left) ResNet-50. ( Right ) ResNeXt-50 with a 32 4d
template (using the reformulation in Fig. 3(c)). Inside the brackets
are the shape of a residual block, and outside the brackets is the
number of stacked blocks on a stage. “ C=32” suggests grouped
convolutions [24] with 32 groups. The numbers of parameters and
FLOPs are similar between these two models.
ual blocks. These blocks have the same topology, and are
subject to two simple rules inspired by VGG/ResNets: (i)
if producing spatial maps of the same size, the blocks share
We present a simple, highly modularized network architecture for image
classification. Our network is constructed by repeating a building block that
aggregates a set of transformations with the same topology. Our simple design
results in a homogeneous, multi-branch architecture that has only a few
hyper-parameters to set. This strategy exposes a new dimension, which we call
"cardinality" (the size of the set of transformations), as an essential factor
in addition to the dimensions of depth and width. On the ImageNet-1K dataset,
we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining
complexity, increasing cardinality is able to improve classification accuracy.
Moreover, increasing cardinality is more effective than going deeper or wider
when we increase the capacity. Our models, named ResNeXt, are the foundations
of our entry to the ILSVRC 2016 classification task in which we secured 2nd
place. We further investigate ResNeXt on an ImageNet-5K set and the COCO
detection set, also showing better results than its ResNet counterpart. The
code and models are publicly available online.
Saining Xie Ross Girshick Piotr Dollár Zhuowen Tu Kaiming He