is measured using the mAP. We considered two training settin gs: (i) computing the ConvNet featuresonthewholeimageandignoringtheprovidedboundingb ox;(ii)computingthefeaturesonthe
wholeimageandontheprovidedboundingbox,andstackingth emtoobtaintheﬁnalrepresentation.
TheresultsarecomparedtootherapproachesinTable12.
OurrepresentationachievesthestateofartontheVOCactio nclassiﬁcationtaskevenwithoutusing
the provided bounding boxes, and the results are further imp roved when using both images and
bounding boxes. Unlike other approaches, we did not incorpo rate any task-speciﬁc heuristics, but
reliedontherepresentationpowerofverydeepconvolution alfeatures.
Other Recognition Tasks. Since the public release of our models, they have been active ly used
by the research community for a wide range of image recogniti on tasks, consistently outperforming more shallow representations. For instance, Girshicke t al. (2014) achieve the state of the
object detection results by replacing the ConvNet of Krizhe vskyet al. (2012) with our 16-layer
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman