and system-level properties by global attributes. The GN framework's block organization emphasizes
customizability and synthesizing new architectures which express desired relational inductive biases.
The key design principles are: Flexible representations (see Section 4.1); Congurable within-block
structure (see Section 4.2); and Composable multi-block architectures (see Section 4.3).
We introduce a motivating example to help make the GN formalism more concrete. Consider
predicting the movements a set of rubber balls in an arbitrary gravitational eld, which, instead of
bouncing against one another, each have one or more springs which connect them to some (or all) of
the others. We will refer to this running example throughout the denitions below, to motivate the
graph representation and the computations operating over it. Figure 2 depicts some other common
scenarios that can be represented by graphs and reasoned over using graph networks.
3.2.1 Denition of \graph"
Within our GN framework, a graph is dened as a 3-tuple G=(u;V;E )(see Box 3 for details of
graph representations). The uis a global attribute; for example, umight represent the gravitational
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu