Different channels appear to capture the motion of different body parts. In the 5thcolumn, we display
the offset magnitudes, which highlight salient human motion. Finally, the last two columns illustrate
the standard Farneback ﬂow, and the human motion predicted from our learned offsets. To predict
human motion we train a linear classiﬁer to regress the ground-truth (x;y)displacement of each
joint from the offset maps. The color wheel, at the bottom right corner encodes motion direction.
4.5 Interpreting Learned Offsets
Understanding what information is encoded in our learned offsets is nearly as difﬁcult as analyzing
any other CNN features [ 59,60]. The main challenge comes from the high dimensionality of offsets:
we are predicting ckhkw(x;y)displacements for every pixel for each of the ﬁve dilation
ratesd, wherecis the number of channels, and kh;kware the convolutional kernel height and width
respectively.
In columns 3;4of Figure 5, we visualize two randomly-selected offset channels as a motion ﬁeld.
Based on this ﬁgure, it appears that different offset maps encode different motions rather than all
Modern approaches for multi-person pose estimation in video require large
amounts of dense annotations. However, labeling every frame in a video is
costly and labor intensive. To reduce the need for dense annotations, we
propose a PoseWarper network that leverages training videos with sparse
annotations (every k frames) to learn to perform dense temporal pose
propagation and estimation. Given a pair of video frames---a labeled Frame A
and an unlabeled Frame B---we train our model to predict human pose in Frame A
using the features from Frame B by means of deformable convolutions to
implicitly learn the pose warping between A and B. We demonstrate that we can
leverage our trained PoseWarper for several applications. First, at inference
time we can reverse the application direction of our network in order to
propagate pose information from manually annotated frames to unlabeled frames.
This makes it possible to generate pose annotations for the entire video given
only a few manually-labeled frames. Compared to modern label propagation
methods based on optical flow, our warping mechanism is much more compact (6M
vs 39M parameters), and also more accurate (88.7% mAP vs 83.8% mAP). We also
show that we can improve the accuracy of a pose estimator by training it on an
augmented dataset obtained by adding our propagated poses to the original
manual labels. Lastly, we can use our PoseWarper to aggregate temporal pose
information from neighboring frames during inference. This allows our system to
achieve state-of-the-art pose detection results on the PoseTrack2017 and
PoseTrack2018 datasets. Code has been made available at:
https://github.com/facebookresearch/PoseWarper.
Gedas Bertasius Christoph Feichtenhofer Du Tran Jianbo Shi Lorenzo Torresani