depend on the time of day. RNNs also carry a bias for locality in the sequence via their Markovian
structure (Table 1).
2.2 Computations over sets and graphs
While the standard deep learning toolkit contains methods with various forms of relational inductive
biases, there is no \default" deep learning component which operates on arbitrary relational structure.
We need models with explicit representations of entities and relations, and learning algorithms which
nd rules for computing their interactions, as well as ways of grounding them in data. Importantly,
entities in the world (such as objects and agents) do not have a natural order; rather, orderings
can be dened by the properties of their relations. For example, the relations between the sizes of
a set of objects can potentially be used to order them, as can their masses, ages, toxicities, and
prices. Invariance to ordering|except in the face of relations|is a property that should ideally be
re
ected by a deep learning component for relational reasoning.
Sets are a natural representation for systems which are described by entities whose order is
undened or irrelevant; in particular, their relational inductive bias does not come from the presence
of something, but rather from the absence . For illustration, consider the task of predicting the center
7
H H
O
The brown 
dog jumped. The
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu