structure as Gt
hid, and they can be easily combined by concatenating their corresponding ek,vi,
anduvectors (where the upward arrow merges into the left-hand horizontal arrow in Figure 6c),
before being passed to GNcore. For the output, the Gt
hidis copied (where the right-hand horizontal
arrow splits into the downward arrow in Figure 6c) and decoded by GNdec. This design reuses GN
blocks in several ways: GNenc,GNdec, and GNcoreare shared across each step, t; and within each
step, GN coremay perform multiple shared sub-steps.
Various other techniques for designing GN-based architectures can be useful. Graph skip
connections, for example, would concatenate a GN block's input graph, Gm, with its output graph,
Gm+1, before proceeding to further computations. Merging and smoothing input and hidden graph
information, as in Figure 6c, can use LSTM- or GRU-style gating schemes, instead of simple
concatenation (Li et al., 2016). Or distinct, recurrent GN blocks (e.g. Figure 4b) can be composed
before and/or after other GN blocks, to improve stability in the representations over multiple
propagation steps (Sanchez-Gonzalez et al., 2018).
Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making
major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and
decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute
resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many
defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much
different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular,
generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from
infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI.
  The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We
argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to
achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and
computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature
and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between
"hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an
approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how
using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can
facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We
present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational
inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various
approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a
straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing
structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational
reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more
sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a
companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for
building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.
Peter W. Battaglia Jessica B. Hamrick Victor Bapst Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez Vinicius Zambaldi Mateusz Malinowski Andrea Tacchetti David Raposo Adam Santoro Ryan Faulkner Caglar Gulcehre Francis Song Andrew Ballard Justin Gilmer George Dahl Ashish Vaswani Kelsey Allen Charles Nash Victoria Langston Chris Dyer Nicolas Heess Daan Wierstra Pushmeet Kohli Matt Botvinick Oriol Vinyals Yujia Li Razvan Pascanu