Ourdesignchoicesarethendiscussedandcomparedtothepri orart inSect. 2.3.
2.1 A RCHITECTURE
During training, the input to our ConvNets is a ﬁxed-size 224×224RGB image. The only preprocessingwedoissubtractingthemeanRGBvalue,computed onthetrainingset,fromeachpixel.
Theimageispassedthroughastackofconvolutional(conv.) layers,whereweuseﬁlterswithavery
small receptive ﬁeld: 3×3(which is the smallest size to capture the notion of left/rig ht, up/down,
center). In one of the conﬁgurationswe also utilise 1×1convolutionﬁlters, which can be seen as
a linear transformationof the input channels (followed by n on-linearity). The convolutionstride is
ﬁxedto1pixel;thespatialpaddingofconv.layerinputissuchthatt hespatialresolutionispreserved
afterconvolution,i.e. the paddingis 1pixel for3×3conv.layers. Spatial poolingis carriedoutby
In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on
its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting. Our main
contribution is a thorough evaluation of networks of increasing depth using an
architecture with very small (3x3) convolution filters, which shows that a
significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by
pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers. These findings were the basis of our
ImageNet Challenge 2014 submission, where our team secured the first and the
second places in the localisation and classification tracks respectively. We
also show that our representations generalise well to other datasets, where
they achieve state-of-the-art results. We have made our two best-performing
ConvNet models publicly available to facilitate further research on the use of
deep visual representations in computer vision.
Karen Simonyan Andrew Zisserman