The Pentagon released its findings from its Quadrennial Defense Review today.  This review focuses mainly on defining and identifying weak points in United States defenses, and  prescriptions for improvements in those areas. 
This review, known as the Quadrennial Defense Review because Congress requires it every four years, does not alter the Pentagon's approach in Iraq. It also leaves intact the Defense Department's broader strategy for keeping the U.S. military big enough to fight other major conflicts.
The plan proposes a 4.8% boost to the Department of Defense budget, eliminates no major weapons programs and includes an 8 percent overall increase for weapons (to US$84 billion) for the budget year starting Sept. 30.  This review excludes the Energy Department's nuclear weapons programs.
Overall, there was an emphasis on finding ways to adopt a more indirect approach to the war on terror; a shifted emphasis from performing tasks to enabling other countries to perform.  Some of the specific proposals include:
Other highlights include:

Share this: 






This page is archived, and is no longer publicly editable.
Got a correction? Add the template {{editprotected}} to the talk page along with your corrections, and it will be brought to the attention of the administrators.
Please note that due to our archival policy, we will not alter or update the content of articles that are archived, but will only accept requests to make grammatical and formatting corrections.
Note that some listed sources or external links may no longer be available online due to age.
Got a correction? Add the template {{editprotected}} to the talk page along with your corrections, and it will be brought to the attention of the administrators.
Please note that due to our archival policy, we will not alter or update the content of articles that are archived, but will only accept requests to make grammatical and formatting corrections.
Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review released