What is the company's revenue for 2021-Q2 
rs involved in seeing that getting realized.
So I think China has the ability to move very fast once the policy framework is in place.
Amit Dayal -- H.C. Wainwright & Co. -- Analyst
Understood. And then on the stationary power side, right, it seems like that's a market that is maybe ready to go now with fuel cells, etc., with micro-grid adoption and all of the other sort of applications around stationary power. What are we doing from a business development perspective to sort of get a bigger share in that space? Even from an R&D perspective, what kind of resources are we sort of applying to maybe create a bigger presence on the stationary power side?
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Yes. So good question. And really, we are, of course, seeing leverage off of the work we're doing in our technology and products, including the ability to use those products in a number of stationary power market applications. We have increased our business development activities globally.
So in China, in Europe, in North America and in other markets as well, we've brought on additional resources. And there's a lot of active discussions underway with different companies in the value chain. And some of them quite large-scale companies that are looking to really game-change decarbonization and stationary power market segments. So still too early for us to comment on the progress we're making there on the business development side, but we hope to be able to provide more visibility later this year.
But we're making the investments we need to, both on the technology as well as on customer engagement to move the yardsticks.
Amit Dayal -- H.C. Wainwright & Co. -- Analyst
Understood. That's all I have. Thank you Randy.
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Operator
The next question comes from Craig Shere with Tuohy Brothers. Please go ahead.
Craig Shere -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst
Hi, thanks for the taking questions. Randy, I apologize. I'm not sure I reconcile answers to your couple of questions regarding hydrogen fuel supply. It sounds like the response to one was that, we need to leave this up to the big boys, the integrated energy conglomerates, industrial gas companies that will be the main supplier and relied upon.
But in another question, it sounded like some turnkey Ballard electrolyzer application opportunities could have meaningful kind of turnkey, all quick adoption opportunities for end customers, and of course, some of that related to the Fusion-Fuel and other opportunities. Can you kind of help me understand how to triangulate all this?
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Yes, Craig, great question, and we should be very clear about this. There's the difference between designing and manufacturing equipment that you sell versus being a supplier of hydrogen. And what we were describing before was the opportunity for Ballard, particularly with our PEM fuel cell capabilities to potentially look at PEM electrolyzer manufacturing downstream. So not being a supplier of hydrogen, but a supplier of electrolyzer equipment.
So we don't discount that opportunity. That's certainly an opportunity that we have a high level of interest in, but we wouldn't be looking to sell hydrogen as a captive supplier as an energy company. Is that helpful?
Craig Shere -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst
That's helpful. But nonetheless, if the end user buys the fuel cell equipment and buys the electrolyzers, they have all they need to make the package work, right?
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Right. So what you'll see typically is end users like a transit authority, would say to Shell, we'd like to have a fueling station built. Shell will then go to an electrolyzer company if they want on-site hydrogen production by the electrolyzer, put in place the compression and chillers and storage and dispensing equipment, own and operate that asset and sell the hydrogen fuel to that transit operator. So we would be OK being a provider of electrolyzer equipment in that model I just described, but we wouldn't be in the role of Shell wher
rs involved in seeing that getting realized.
So I think China has the ability to move very fast once the policy framework is in place.
Amit Dayal -- H.C. Wainwright & Co. -- Analyst
Understood. And then on the stationary power side, right, it seems like that's a market that is maybe ready to go now with fuel cells, etc., with micro-grid adoption and all of the other sort of applications around stationary power. What are we doing from a business development perspective to sort of get a bigger share in that space? Even from an R&D perspective, what kind of resources are we sort of applying to maybe create a bigger presence on the stationary power side?
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Yes. So good question. And really, we are, of course, seeing leverage off of the work we're doing in our technology and products, including the ability to use those products in a number of stationary power market applications. We have increased our business development activities globally.
So in China, in Europe, in North America and in other markets as well, we've brought on additional resources. And there's a lot of active discussions underway with different companies in the value chain. And some of them quite large-scale companies that are looking to really game-change decarbonization and stationary power market segments. So still too early for us to comment on the progress we're making there on the business development side, but we hope to be able to provide more visibility later this year.
But we're making the investments we need to, both on the technology as well as on customer engagement to move the yardsticks.
Amit Dayal -- H.C. Wainwright & Co. -- Analyst
Understood. That's all I have. Thank you Randy.
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Operator
The next question comes from Craig Shere with Tuohy Brothers. Please go ahead.
Craig Shere -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst
Hi, thanks for the taking questions. Randy, I apologize. I'm not sure I reconcile answers to your couple of questions regarding hydrogen fuel supply. It sounds like the response to one was that, we need to leave this up to the big boys, the integrated energy conglomerates, industrial gas companies that will be the main supplier and relied upon.
 But in another question, it sounded like some turnkey Ballard electrolyzer application opportunities could have meaningful kind of turnkey, all quick adoption opportunities for end customers, and of course, some of that related to the Fusion-Fuel and other opportunities. Can you kind of help me understand how to triangulate all this?
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Yes, Craig, great question, and we should be very clear about this. There's the difference between designing and manufacturing equipment that you sell versus being a supplier of hydrogen. And what we were describing before was the opportunity for Ballard, particularly with our PEM fuel cell capabilities to potentially look at PEM electrolyzer manufacturing downstream. So not being a supplier of hydrogen, but a supplier of electrolyzer equipment.
So we don't discount that opportunity. That's certainly an opportunity that we have a high level of interest in, but we wouldn't be looking to sell hydrogen as a captive supplier as an energy company. Is that helpful?
Craig Shere -- Tuohy Brothers -- Analyst
That's helpful. But nonetheless, if the end user buys the fuel cell equipment and buys the electrolyzers, they have all they need to make the package work, right?
Randall MacEwen -- Chief Executive Officer
Right. So what you'll see typically is end users like a transit authority, would say to Shell, we'd like to have a fueling station built. Shell will then go to an electrolyzer company if they want on-site hydrogen production by the electrolyzer, put in place the compression and chillers and storage and dispensing equipment, own and operate that asset and sell the hydrogen fuel to that transit operator. So we would be OK being a provider of electrolyzer equipment in that model I just described, but we wouldn't be in the role of Shell wher