What was the QTL revenue for Q3 2019, ex-Apple 
invest into. And those are interesting opportunities. So, we see 5G as an opportunity to allow us to really leverage some of the R&D scale that we have in mobile. And we see that we're going to take advantage of it and try to stay focused along the same way.
Cristiano Amon -- President
So, I was just going to add a few things. First, when you look at it as you mentioned the adjacent for us non-Apple when you exclude Apple even with some of the economic weakness, we're seeing -- we're still growing both Q2 and Q3 when we look at year-over-year as still double-digit growth. Some of those bets, very small but the trends are -- they are very good.
I think I want to highlight a few that Steve mentioned on industrial. The alignment on our industrial bet with the 5G and the effect of 5G is going to go to many other industries beyond mobile. It's going to be a major tailwind to get a scale on industrial IoT. We see the same thing with the Cellular-V2X and it was going to be added to our existing digital cockpit in telematics business.
One data point that we didn't mention, we still haven't bet on computing. And you should expect to see in the second half calendar, our 8cx which is our first a Snapdragon dedicated for PCs with Microsoft. And that will be the first opportunity that we can start to see that investor materializing.
Now going back to the front end, I believe that our position in 5G is differentiated. What's happening with 5G, the speed of the roadmap especially as you think of a number of antennas and carrier aggregation is moving faster than we saw with 4G. And the ability to design as a system and claim some of the real estate that you had on devices for the front end is giving us an advantage.
We're the only company now that actually has everything from digital to the antenna in house and that give us an ability to build on our strength of being a system versus just a component provider. And that materialize in the fact that every single 5G design now you'll find our front end and we expect that to continue.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from the line of C.J. Muse with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.
C.J. Muse -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst
Yes, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. I'll ask two, if I could. First one, trying to level set QTL revenues ex-Apple. So could you help me understand what catch-up payments input/output were related to ASC 606 and other kind of moving parts within that QTL for March and any expectations for June?
And then the second question. Your goal I believe was $6.4 billion OpEx without excess litigation for fiscal 2019. Obviously we're coming above that because of the litigation. But as you look to fiscal '20 is that a number that we could get to considering that most of the litigation that we've been talking about is behind us now? Thank you.
Yes. So let me start with Q2. So we communicated in the prepared comments there was about $100 million of more than expected one-time or out-of-period in the QTL revenues of $1.12 billion. So that relates to I would say both ASC 606 adjustments for prior, as well as some one-time adjustments related to some cleanup from prior periods on a few programs.
And then on a go-forward basis, our basis obviously with 606 is forecasting our revenues. There is always going to be some chance of true-up as we move forward and move from really actual that are based on somewhat of an estimate to final understanding of how quarters rolled out. So, Q3 nothing specific with respect to out of period. But we'll have some of that, I think every quarter just based on the nature of 606.
Then with respect to the OpEx. So, yes, the target was to get to $6.4 billion. We do still have excess litigation. And as I said before, we expect to rely some of those litigation savings as we move into fiscal 2020, maybe somewhat offset by our need to invest a little bit more to support ramp of Apple.
David Wise -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes. So let me start with Q2. So we communicated in the prepared comments there was about $100 million of more
invest into. And those are interesting opportunities. So, we see 5G as an opportunity to allow us to really leverage some of the R&D scale that we have in mobile. And we see that we're going to take advantage of it and try to stay focused along the same way.
Cristiano Amon -- President
So, I was just going to add a few things. First, when you look at it as you mentioned the adjacent for us non-Apple when you exclude Apple even with some of the economic weakness, we're seeing -- we're still growing both Q2 and Q3 when we look at year-over-year as still double-digit growth. Some of those bets, very small but the trends are -- they are very good.
I think I want to highlight a few that Steve mentioned on industrial. The alignment on our industrial bet with the 5G and the effect of 5G is going to go to many other industries beyond mobile. It's going to be a major tailwind to get a scale on industrial IoT. We see the same thing with the Cellular-V2X and it was going to be added to our existing digital cockpit in telematics business.
One data point that we didn't mention, we still haven't bet on computing. And you should expect to see in the second half calendar, our 8cx which is our first a Snapdragon dedicated for PCs with Microsoft. And that will be the first opportunity that we can start to see that investor materializing.
Now going back to the front end, I believe that our position in 5G is differentiated. What's happening with 5G, the speed of the roadmap especially as you think of a number of antennas and carrier aggregation is moving faster than we saw with 4G. And the ability to design as a system and claim some of the real estate that you had on devices for the front end is giving us an advantage.
We're the only company now that actually has everything from digital to the antenna in house and that give us an ability to build on our strength of being a system versus just a component provider. And that materialize in the fact that every single 5G design now you'll find our front end and we expect that to continue.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from the line of C.J. Muse with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.
C.J. Muse -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst
 Yes, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. I'll ask two, if I could. First one, trying to level set QTL revenues ex-Apple. So could you help me understand what catch-up payments input/output were related to ASC 606 and other kind of moving parts within that QTL for March and any expectations for June?
And then the second question. Your goal I believe was $6.4 billion OpEx without excess litigation for fiscal 2019. Obviously we're coming above that because of the litigation. But as you look to fiscal '20 is that a number that we could get to considering that most of the litigation that we've been talking about is behind us now? Thank you.
Yes. So let me start with Q2. So we communicated in the prepared comments there was about $100 million of more than expected one-time or out-of-period in the QTL revenues of $1.12 billion. So that relates to I would say both ASC 606 adjustments for prior, as well as some one-time adjustments related to some cleanup from prior periods on a few programs.
And then on a go-forward basis, our basis obviously with 606 is forecasting our revenues. There is always going to be some chance of true-up as we move forward and move from really actual that are based on somewhat of an estimate to final understanding of how quarters rolled out. So, Q3 nothing specific with respect to out of period. But we'll have some of that, I think every quarter just based on the nature of 606.
Then with respect to the OpEx. So, yes, the target was to get to $6.4 billion. We do still have excess litigation. And as I said before, we expect to rely some of those litigation savings as we move into fiscal 2020, maybe somewhat offset by our need to invest a little bit more to support ramp of Apple.
David Wise -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes. So let me start with Q2. So we communicated in the prepared comments there was about $100 million of more