>

I wouldn’t mind paying for news, if they actually removed all the ridiculous ads upon doing so though.
And still no motive or any sort of explanation for wtf this guy was thinking. >

He wasn't thinking. Probably just some white noise in that head... if he thought for a split second, he wouldn't have shot a child in the head. >

Fucking sad excuse of a human. >

Imma assume he had public defenders and I bet they think the same thing >

There's seriously no integrity in journalism anymore. Every article I read about this says something different. One said he was shot in his own yard, another said the neighbors yard, another said in the street and yet another said it actually happened in his own driveway. One article even went as far to claim he was first run over, then shot. 
Some said he had an attorney, some said he didn't. Some said he was getting life, some said he was getting death. I can't help but think all these embellishments are put in to just rile people up and get more shares. Despite the verdict this is still an ongoing investigation and nobody really knows exactly what happened or why. >

This is what good editors should be well paid for. A good editing staff would reject an inaccurate write up. >

Who is going to pay for editors? We collectively decided we don’t want to pay for news. Give me hashtags and 280 characters max.