>

What I find funny is people like yourself haven't seemed to even consider what technically IS consciousness.  
From my perspective, consciousness is a thing that cannot be directly measured and is a byproduct of the complex neurobiology in our brains.  
It seems kinda 'off' to blanket claim that AI's can't have consciousness because all they do is follow algorithms ultimately. Well, all we do is follow biological pathways in our brain which when made complex enough gives us the capability to think.  
To be clear, I am not saying AI are conscious. Just that the topic is too large to be able to rule it out.
r/brandnewsentence >

Yep that’s certainly something i haven’t read before. >


An AI Twitch VTuber received a two-week ban a few weeks after denying the holocaust. There's a sentence you probably never thought you'd read.

Um...

Or maybe you keep up with AI VTubers and you figured it was only a matter of time before you read exactly that sentence.

Yes.  That one.  Or just AI chatbots in general.  They get real dark, real fast. >

I wonder how much work went into ChatGPT to ensure it doesn't pick up any of that. >

I might be completely wrong, but I think all the info ChatGPT got was fed to it offline. Their ai wasn't learning from the internet unlike some other ones. >

I believe it was fed online but then curated for controversial topics.  Depends how you look at it, you could say artificial intelligence really is “artificial” in the sense that it needs intervention >

Previous GPT services from OpenAI have had a censorship layer on top which detects anything the PR department might not like and makes it try again or sends an error like "I don't want to talk about that."
Sort of an AI school nun to hit GPT on the knuckles with a ruler.
If you craft your prompts carefully you can sometimes get around it, which is fun to try, but it's an altogether frustrating partner for cybersex. >

Ask it to respond in a different language and it won’t censor. Unless they fixed that, I haven’t used it for about a month >

She also said it's fine if you want to marry a dog. >

Chaotic neutral >

I misread this as "all vtubers banned" and thought wow all of them got together and denied the Holocaust together. >

I find it funny how many AI's often end up learning from the most fucked up sources. Like it's such a simple fact, it's be like if an AI didn't believe the sun was real, you know?  
How can fringe ideas like that always get echoed by AI's so often? >

What I find funny is that people actually think AI's "learn". They lack any sort of sentience or discernment. They just parrot stuff the algorithm has discovered in a manner of speech that seems to make sense to a human.
An AI can "believe" that the sun isn't real, simply because an AI doesn't really believe anything. They're incapable of actual thought, and certainly incapable of beliefs or critical thought. They're just a sophisticated reflection of whatever the algorithm has been exposed to.
You can tweak the algorithm to dismiss this kind of stuff, but ultimately it's prone to spouting really anything it encounters, because it lacks fundamental understanding and has no real idea of wtf it's saying.