>

If he didn’t fight this, and lie about why he couldn’t release his taxes, then all this would have been forgotten about years ago.
His son took money from a charity for children with cancer.
His casino(s) was(were) fined for money laundering.
He was sued by so many people you wouldn't believe. Only the best people. >

He also used veteran charity money for himself >

( Republican response) Oh yeah? But what about Hunter Biden’s laptop? >

(Alternative Republican response) Yea, that just makes him smart! >

(Alternative again) “I don’t agree with everything he does, but I like his policies” >

so, how that wall going? Has the check from Mexico cleared yet? >

If trump says Mexico will pay for it, I believe him! He never lies …. >

I paid more taxes with my last paycheck than DJT did in a whole year >

How does someone pay taxes on money they didn't make >

The rich can “lose” money on tax returns and still become richer….  That is the whole issue with the US tax system.  You can invest and reallocate funds.  His company was fined(convicted feel’s wrong since nobody was held accountable) for this in 2022, they were paying for things off book to their employees.  He absolutely “rents mar-a-lago” at a reduced price and that is tax fraud. >

Partial truths; let me clarify.


Trump takes advantage of cost segregation studies and 1031 exchanges.  What is a cost seg?  When you buy or build a building, you are not just building a building.  You are putting appliances, land improvements and other things in.  If an asset qualifies for special depreciation, you can bonus it out and expense the asset the year it's in service.  Cost seg studies identify this sort of property.  You would typically recapture this and pay tax when the building is sold; but if you use 1031 exchanges you don't incur a recapturable event.  Trump's losses are disconnected from his wealth.  Cost seg, cash out refi, buy a building, cost seg... leads to tax losses as long as we have 100% bonus depreciation even though he is building wealth.


No, the Trump Org was convicted.  They weren't recording PUCC and tuition payments for employees kids as income to them and that is very, very wrong.  I would agree it is fraud.


Not wrong, but I am a CPA and want to clarify. >

It's pretty clear and has been very clear. But yeah thx >

As evidenced by the misinformation floating around, no it has not >

You're just in denial >

Oh wow, where did you get your MAcc?  Which state are you a licensed CPA in? >

This is where you're in denial it doesn't take all that to see what he's doing. >

Then explain to me, using laymen’s terms, what is going on? >

There are also questions about Trump’s returns listing an identical amount of company expenses and profits.
For example, in 2017, Trump claimed his business DJT Aerospace LLC, which operates Trump’s personal helicopter, claimed $42,965 in profit. It also claimed the exact same amount – $42,965 – in expenses. In other words, every single dollar – to the dollar – that the company earned was negated by the company’s expenses, such as payroll, fuel and other items. That left the company with zero income – and nothing to tax.
“Total expenses equaling total income is a statistical impossibility,” said Shiel. “It just doesn’t happen.” >

That at least makes sense to me from a shell game perspective considering he liked to fudge appraisals...

buy helicopter for 1.5MM
create shell company and "loan" it 0.5MM
sell helicopter to shell company for 0.5MM
write down 1MM in personal loss
shell company charges back its expenses annually

At that point... 

You have removed 1MM on your taxable income
You tell the tax man the helicopter company has $0 in income and a 0.5MM helicopter but also 0.5MM debt
You tell creditors it has $1MM in assets - liabilities >

This scheme is likely inked in sharpie on a McDonald’s napkin somewhere in mar a lago >

Stored in a cardboard box next to some nuclear weapon schematics. >

That’s one of the game settings for the next Metal Gear game, set in the 70s.
You sneak into the base to get the nuclear plans, and then you hide in the cardboard box to get out.
Armstrong has a cameo in the game where you get to see why his backstory and why he turned out to be someone who wanted to Make America Great Again.
There’s another cameo by Otacon who pissed his pants at Tokyo Big Sight during a convention for Go Nagai’s works.
The highlight of the game would be the nuclear launch triggering a mutation in a lizard and then you get to fight the giant lizard with Daikatana for some reason. >

He cheated and paid no tax.
The end. >

"In 2017, for example, Trump claimed he received exactly $18,000 in interest on a loan he said he gave his daughter Ivanka Trump. He claimed $8,715 in interest from his son Donald Trump, Jr., and exactly $24,000 from his son Eric Trump.
That raises the question of whether “the loans were bona fide arm’s length transactions, or whether the transfers were disguised gifts that could trigger gift tax and a disallowance of interest deductions by the related borrowers,” the JCT said in its report.
“It’s unusual to have interest in round numbers – very rare,” said Martin Sheil..." >

At this point, I’m not worried about the payments in the tens of thousands, as red of flags as they are. >

That’s how they got Capone. (Maybe not exactly but I just wanted to say that) >

Taxes in general? Sure. But focusing on relatively small stuff isn’t where to put energies just now. Those and things to throw on the pile later, when the huge things have been thoroughly rent asunder.
And in this case, there some plausible explanations that make it not as egregious as many of the other things. You can pay interest in round amounts on your mortgage, if you want, for example. If most of the interest wasn’t due until a balloon payment at the end on a personal loan, it’s not the end of the world to round something up for an annual payment. I’m not saying these family loans were completely fine, but I’m not going to worry about them at all just now. >

+1 for "rent asunder" >

400 flow-through entities?
That’s suspicious in and of itself. >

And yet nothing flowed through. 
And I’m afraid to take a home office deduction. >

"here's a picture of you using the office chair you deducted while playing your Xbox. You're fucked, boyo!" >

Is that how it is? Damn >

You can do partial deductions but idk if that includes things like offices for wage employees. 
I deduct half the cost of my phone because I’m required to have it for work but the other 8 hours of the day I use it for personal use. >

Do you work 16 hour days, or do you turn your phone into the company while you're sleeping? >

Of the waking day* >

So the real takeaway from this article is that our US tax code needs to be cleaned up and simplified so that people like Trump can’t shelter their money and avoid paying taxes. 
Also, “charitable foundations” need to go away. We all know that rich people set them up to hide their money or to filter it back to themselves tax free. >

That it is incredibly generous to a guy that is so obviously a cheat and a fraud. Don’t give him the benefit of the doubt. 
Even with the tax code we have, it isn’t plausible that he could support his lavish lifestyle over many years without taxable income. The obvious answer is that he is a tax cheat and the IRS wasn’t looking for political reasons. 
Now there’s plenty of accountants scrutinizing everything. >

Crowd-sourced auditing. And no additional expense to the taxpayer! >

Actually, this could be a viable business model for the IRS. Plenty of people would voluntarily scour billionaires’ tax returns for them. >

Especially if there is a reward, like 5% of the taxes owed. Someone owes $1 million, I'm sure there are plenty of people willing to spend the time to make $50,000 with maybe a few weeks of work. And then make THAT $50,000 tax free. The government gets $950,000 that they never expected, it's worth giving the $50,000 away. >

This is why dollars spent on tax agencies tend to return more than was spent. It turns out paying somebody $50k/year to find $1M/year in fraud is a damn good deal, even if it's more like $150k/$250k >

I’m guessing it won’t take long. He has a history of paying zero or close to zero taxes. He paid less than me one year and I work in the NHS.  He has no shame. >

Think the rest of them are any different? >

Oh yeah, you’re right.  That makes it okay then. >

I paid more taxes when I was in the service... >

Me too. I pay several thousands every year, increasing each year for 7 years apparently due to some "law?" he enacted.  And my income is less than twenty K per year. That cheap bastard, paying nothing. What is American about not paying your taxes? With great wealth comes great responsibility. Oops, I forgot he is not rational and has no empathy. >

Are you guys not “smart”?
/s >

There are several things that tax professionals may be looking for when examining someone's tax returns, including:
Income: This includes all sources of income, such as wages, investments, and business profits. Tax professionals may want to verify that all income has been reported and that the correct amount of tax has been paid on it.
Deductions: Taxpayers can claim deductions to reduce their taxable income and lower their tax bill. Tax professionals may want to verify that deductions claimed are valid and supported by documentation.
Credits: Credits are reductions to a taxpayer's tax bill that are based on certain activities or circumstances, such as having children or being a student. Tax professionals may want to verify that credits claimed are valid and supported by documentation.
Compliance: Tax professionals may want to ensure that the tax returns are accurate and complete, and that all necessary forms and schedules are included. They may also want to verify that the taxpayer has followed all relevant tax laws and regulations.
Red flags: Tax professionals may be on the lookout for any unusual or suspicious activity on the tax returns, such as large, unexplained deductions or income that doesn't seem to match the taxpayer's reported occupation.
Overall, the goal of examining someone's tax returns is to ensure that all income has been accurately reported and that the correct amount of tax has been paid. >

This reads like a chat gpt response >

Tax returns are exactly like the kind of data that AIs would be great at reading, analyzing, and flagging for issues.  
Hopefully the IRS gets on it to go after the obscenely wealthy more cost-effectively. >

This could be a good window into more than one man's tax evasion schemes. He is not the only one with enough wealth to avoid paying taxes. Instead of cutting funding for the IRS all the time, we need to give them all the money they need to actually audit and litigate the wealthy to hold them accountable. Unfortunately, the ones controlling the budget are also the same ones who may be benefitting, either directly or indirectly, from a lack of accountability. >

Love getting an inside look into the dual system of american taxes. If youre a rich fat orange POS you dont pay anything. If youre a pleb you get to lube up and bend over. >

Sans the lube. >

He stole hundreds of millions of OUR money on fake non existent money he claimed to earn and got a real cash refund -  straight to jail and seize his assets >

The big story is what a terrible businessman Trump is. That is what Trump wanted to hide. 
Whatever he might have done to cheat on his taxes is secondary to the fact that the businesses he runs are failing miserably and have been for year after year. He made significant money off the Apprentice and his passive investments where he’s not making the decisions but wherever he was in charge was a financial disaster. 
His tax returns are a declaration of incompetence in management and the foundation of his 2016 campaign was his ability as a skilled billionaire businessman to manage his empire and thence the   United States. >


The big story is what a terrible businessman Trump is.

I dunno. He's in his 70s playing golf every day. People cook & clean for him, drive him around. Seems to have worked well for him. He can do anything he wants to. Money's no object. >


He's in his 70s playing golf every day. People cook & clean for him, drive him around.

On other people's money. >

Whatever, bottom line is he's living the life of luxury until he dies. Whatever he did/does, it worked. >

Most people could win if they inherit enormous wealth. It’s not really a challenge. >

He paid more to China in taxes than to the USA. So much for America first >

I doubt the tax returns tell us anything we didn't already know about trump, including he's been living off borrowed money for decades.
Unfortunately, there are no lines or tax return schedules for corrupt payments and receipts. >

The real question is: where does the money come from? 
If it's all losses and deductions, how can he possibly maintain such a high net worth?
There might be explanations, but they aren't obvious to me. >

The government intentionally has these loopholes for the rich to fuck the poor. Then the poor end up flipping the bill and getting audited because it would cost way too much to audit the rich. Be mad at trumpy but also be upset with the ppl in government who keep it this way because they ALL benefit from it. >

The poor don’t get audited unless the government is pretty sure they’re going to regain some $. It’s not worth auditing someone to find $1000, it costs more to audit them. If you’re poor and got audited, you blatantly fucked up your tax return.  Even then, poor people are typically getting a refund. The government has no property to seize or funds to claim back by the time the audit happens. Even if you find $3000 owed by someone, if they don’t have the assets you’re just hoping to garnish their wages. They can always just change jobs. Collecting debts isn’t fun when someone can pay it… it’s definitely not fun when they can’t. >

This. Also, the IRS is pretty lenient if you do end up owing somehow. They have programs that will let you pay over time and you can even just send them a letter saying "Hey, I can pay $X right now and I'll get you later", as long as you do so. 
Beyond that, even if you make a mistake, they know what you owe, and will send a letter back telling you. This has only happened with owing for me, haven't worried with refunds.
As had been said here and elsewhere ad infinitum for years on here and elsewhere, we could solve so much BS in our system if we didn't have Intuit lobbying to make money for simple returns (because the IRS already knows the details) and fully funding the IRS to do its job. 
From a social perspective, the more people see these a-holes get away with this stuff, the more death by a thousand charges our system imposes on the middle class and down, the less people see their tax dollars at work, the more build of tension, anger, and disenchantment we will have in the system. >

Jesus, how many more horcruxes do we need? >

All politicians tax returns should be publicly available to every citizen. Some people are worried this will become the new normal, using finances as a political weapon, but I say good. We deserve to know the people we elect and their money says a lot about them. Could it be viewed as an invasion of privacy? Maybe. But they chose tho run for public office. >

I agree 100%. >

He never donated his presidential salary >

Why have such a complicated tax code if you don't have the personnel/resources to do complicated audits. ESPECIALLY if it's a POTUS where they are obligated to do such an audit? They just go after us chumps that are low hanging fruit because  it's easier. Just like with the criminal legal system, apparently tax codes only apply to certain folks. The IRS has failed. Smh >

The GOP figured out not long ago that it is actually easier to kill the enforcement agency than write tax loopholes. >

Wtf isn’t the IRS doing anything? 
Different set of rules for this wealthy POS. >

Did anyone here forget that one of the first things Trump did after he got elected was to provide himself with a tax cut? >

I just need to know did he donate any of his income/salary as president at all
I never for one second believed he would.
Unless it was to his own charity/hush fund >

The only time Trump never lied: "I could walk down 5th Avenue and shoot someone and my followers would still love me!"  He was absolutely correct.  Blind, Idiot followers.  Sick. >

"The average person doesn't do that," Dubinsky said. "They're getting a W-2 for $85,000. And they're like, 'Well, I'm paying tax on $85,000. Why isn't this guy that's making billions, or supposedly worth billions, paying his fair share?' I mean, I hate to come back to it. But unfortunately that's the way the tax code was crafted."  Hmmmm…and that, kids, is why politicians get lots of money from the REALLY rich. >

I am more interested in what his lenders think of his tax returns. They are checking to see if they match the ones he submitted with his loan applications. I have taken out several mortgages in the last 20 years and I think it was only once that I had to authorize the IRS to release my tax return to the lender instead of them just taking my copy of the return I prepared. >

I think all politicians should have to show their tax returns. >

Wow he went into the wrong business, instead of realestate, he should have become an accountant, he knows exactly how to make rich people millions of dollars off of the federal government... >

Naw he just hired people who know how >

This right here. He just paid smart people to do shit this way.  Though, if they’re filing docs with the income and expenses being exactly the same, he apparently paid some dumb people to do the shit too. >

He seems to regularly hire dumb people for his crimes… >

So does this mean I don’t have to pay my taxes too? >

The fact of the matter is that the rich, especially the political class, are able to get away with murder by exploiting all kinds of loopholes. Also, some cruel actuaries inside the IRS realized that it's much more advantageous to go after folks with less money. They can't afford the time or money to fight back. Rich people will happily spend a few hundred K on legal representation if it allows them to get out of paying a few million. 
A major loophole that isn't talked about often is senators and congresspeople technically being "farmers." They raise horses or wine grapes, as a hobby, and use those "losses" to wipe out what they owe from their other money-making enterprises. And they get to stand in the Winner's Circle at Pimlico with giant checks, or stoke their ego with their own wine label. >

Nailed it.  The folks that are regulating taxes are the last ones willing to end the loopholes they are privy to and use on the regular >

Biggest LOSER! >

So why can’t they be thourough and go through all of it and not just a portion. Seems its all pretty important. Good or bad for him >

The most important thing I'm looking for is foreign footprint. >

Trump paid more in foreign taxes than he paid US taxes >

Yes I’m going to Donate my salary 
But I’m going to steal the government with 
Hotels charges big time >

Only an idiot with a lousy tax accountant pays taxes on big business New York real estate. 
He is an Idiot but his tax advisor is not. >

"Everybody cheats"  - I don't know if that's true to the extent that Trump does it, and in any case it's not a valid defense for being a lying sack of shit for your whole life.
If he can't pay taxes then he's an unpatriotic con-man.  That's not a good platform to be POTUS. >

I absolutely despise the cretin but the absurdity of him saying ”It proves how smart he is” hits on a Black Adder level. >

When my husband and I were younger, They had a thing called the alternative minimum tax to make sure that you paid some tax regardless of your losses. I guess that’s gone now. >

I'm curious to know what kind of conversion rate he got when he converted rubles to dollars. >

Lock him up >

I wonder how much of his bribe money was spent in Des Moines area? >

On the surface the returns look ok to me, it is what you would expect from a supposed billionaire. My hope would be that the IRS would dig in and and audit the huge losses and especially the $21 million or so in charity. I doubt that Trump is that charitable. The huge losses and big charity amounts are truly red flags. >

Seems like anyone with a net worth over a certain amount ($10 million?) should have their taxes audited every year. >

“How much did money Trump make from being famous?”
C’mon journalists🤦🏻‍♂️ >

Personally I’m looking for something to string him up by his balls and put him in jail forever >

Someone fucking wake me up when he’s in jail otherwise I am sick and tired of seeing his mug. >

When criminal charges from this are pending, let me know. Until then, go away. >

2022 tax filings are due in less than four months. I’d love to see what he claims on this return knowing it will most likely be audited. >

Hopefully trump will expose the problem with the ultra wealthy  and close the tax loopholes that are out there. And then go to jail. The best thing he ever did as an American >

A write off of Stormy Danials for professional services >


Why isn't this guy that's making billions, or supposedly worth billions, paying his fair share?' I mean, I hate to come back to it. But unfortunately that's the way the tax code was crafted."

Yes, crafted by lobbyists paid by the rich to skew the tax code in their favor.
Oh and also regulatory capture...

Regulatory capture occurs when a government’s regulatory agency, which was created in the public interest, ends up advancing the political or commercial concerns of the very people, companies or entities it is supposed to be regulating. Regulatory capture, in the world of government monitoring, is like when the gamekeeper turns poacher, or at least, assists the poacher.
Regulatory capture is a form of government failure. Government failure, also known as non-market failure, is imperfection in government performance. Regulatory capture is a form of rent-seeking – trying to get a larger slice of a market’s total wealth without creating any additional wealth for that market.
When regulatory capture exists, the interest of political groups or companies become more important than those of the public, which leads to a net loss to society. >

Almost 100 and still needs daddys cash. >

Need to throw out the entire tax code. No more deductions.  Flat percentage tax on income and wealth. Start taxing the interest that is paid out due to investments.  
Flat tax rate across the board, staggered by income tier.  Let’s bring the income brackets from FDR back. Also, lift the cap on social security taxes. Only the first 120,000 of income is subject to this tax, once it’s above that — there is no social security tax.  
This will fix multiple issues across the damn board. The tax code should be so simple, that a office building full of nerds who like numbers and get paid millions by the wealthy, would be obsolete. >

Can we just start taxing revenue instead of profits for both individuals and businesses? I think all of our personal tax rates would go down significantly. >

Anyone for guessing how much the tax bill will actually be in the final tally? 
I am going to go with 15 million. >

That’s just money. Probably just another write-off. There should be a real physical penalty. Put him jail next to the lady that “voted illegally”. >

A lot of armchair tax accountants here, as a non-tax CPA, this is above my head. 
Is there a thread where actual tax accountants are combing through this that we can follow? >

Of course there won’t be just going to be a lot of speculation by individuals who don’t understand anything about taxes or inner workings of a business. The Accounting subreddit someone might but who is going to spend time looking over a tax return with no backup that they aren’t going to get paid for. I’m not gonna to spend my Friday night reviewing a dumpy idiots taxes when I’ve got my own Year End closing to worry about lol. Maybe there’s fraud maybe it’s legal tax avoidance but whatever it is there’s no way to know without supporting documentation. >

I mean, if I was a tax accountant, this would be interesting enough to me to crack open on my spare time, I imagine I’m not the only person to feel that way >

I have a feeling it’s going to look a lot like any other large real estate company. I’m sure a bunch will look at it but without supporting documentation I’m not sure how much interest it’ll be other than a quick overview. Maybe they can compare it to a similar client. >

Long story short, he did a lot of shit probably a lot of rich people do, at the direction of his accounts, and chances are high if it’s actually looked at he broke laws. The problem is the tax code is fucking complicated and the more money you have the more complicated it gets. >

Yeah, but that's only a small piece of what they'd be looking for.  I mean that shady 'lots of money' type accounting is almost a certainty, but there are plenty of rich people with 'creative accountants' who stop well short of blatant fraud or money laundering.
I mean, there are a lot of rich people involved in fraud and money laundering too...but it will be interesting to see how far on the 'holy shit' side of that line he is, vs boring 'my accountant told me to carry over charity contributions from 3 years ago and we're only allowed 2 years'...or dumping more than allowed in some tax shelter, etc. >


"I think it does paint a picture of a very complicated business venture system that Donald Trump was running."

If it was complicated, Trump wasn't running it. >

What I’d like to know is why every item re: Trump’s taxes make it seem like he prepared his own returns. Hundreds of pages of tax records must have been all prepared and submitted by a whole gang of crooked people. Who the hell are they? >

GOP is
Dissolving into the as trump said the swamp 😂 >

Nothing will happen. They are too scared or corrupt to ever prosecute him. The January 6 committee gave me some hope, but now that’s all done with and it seems nothing is coming from that either. >

More and more info and testimony is coming out. It paints a picture of just unadulterated lunacy and basically theater that stroked the ego of Trump. It’s truly hilarious. >

I'm really loathe to admit it, but does it seems like a nothingburger?  He avoided taxes through creative, bordering on questionable accounting.  It's reprehensible, and I wish we had stronger enforcement of a better and fairer tax code.  But does it qualify as fraud?  I guess we'll see, but right now we're kidding ourselves if we think that there's an immediate smoking gun here (e.g. source of income form foreign agents).  Given that, I'd love to know why he fought tooth-and-nail to keep these returns private; there's nothing in them that would threaten his popularity among his base of supporters. >

First there's the $800 Million in loans guaranteed PERSONALLY.  Then there's the whole scheme he was running where he's telling the IRS one thing and his lenders another.  I doubt the Ways and Means committee thinks there's a smoking gun in terms of illegal activity like a personal check from Putin, but his lenders are likely to take a look at these returns and have some serious questions about his loan documents.  Lying on loan applications is a crime, so I've got a feeling he's about to get sued into oblivion by creditors. >

The banks that gave loans that were based on fraudulent information can just call for the loans to be paid in full immediately. If he can’t or won’t, then they can seize collateral or go after whoever personally guaranteed the loan. In either case, he’s fucked. >

Nothings going to happen. He won’t get touched. Run for president. And win. And this gets swept under the rug >


How much did money Trump make from being famous?

jfc CBS are you having a stroke >

So the traitor that was caught red handed being a traitor's biggest concern is tax evasion. Wtf America?! >

We can sure all of his diehard fans will praise him for being savvy since taxes are theft to them anyway. >

Do any of y’all honestly not try to pay as little i. taxes as legally possible? Who WANTS to pay more in taxes? I’m quite sure I can spend my money better than the government can. I want to pay the lowest possible amount in taxes as legally possible. Don’t you all? >

The difference is, unless you have massive wealth, the methods for "hiding" or offsetting your income with paper losses aren't available. The tax code was written for the wealthy class leaving the upper middle class to bear the majority of the tax burden. >

I don’t deny that. So why are you all pissed off at a business man who is simply using the tax code legally that was written by the politicians before him. Shouldn’t your anger be towards the lifelong politicians? Say Joe Biden? He’s been in Government his whole life. Why hasn’t he or anyone else done anything about this? It’s because their wealthy donors don’t want them to fix it…. >

Didn't Donald Trump claim that he helped write the tax code through his political donations?
That's the problem. The tax code is so complicated because every wealthy Tom, Dick or Sally gets their pet deductions written into the code through political influence ($$$). I'd love to see how many deductions Trump's 737 gets, for example. 
You're right, though, it's not just the wealthy but their paid politicians that deserve our ire. >

The rich only pay taxes for political reasons. It’s cheaper to buy politicians than pay taxes. They get away with it because enough people think they will be rich one day and don’t want to ruin their future loopholes. >

They get away with it because every congressperson is being paid off. It doesn’t matter what the public at large thinks about their future financial situation. >

LOL >>>>> Lying Orange Lunatic. >

I'm a tax pro and I took a cursory look.
Looks like a generic rich real estate guy type return.  The thing that really sticks out is Mazar's piss-poor presentation and typos throughout the thing. >

My big question is whether the loss carryforwards were legitimate in the first place. I saw something that they were from a questionable tax shelter in the early 1990s. >

Where can I download them? >

Now everyone knows that the rich really don't pay taxes and the tax laws are written so the middle class carries the financial burden while the political elite lines their pockets and the rich get richer. Are you awake yet? >

Tax wealth .. I have unrealized gains on my house but I pay taxes every year based on the "wealth" of the house.  Make millionaires pay on thier unrealized wealth, stocks, bonds etc,  like the rest of us >

I'm surprised the IRS isn't better funded. It should pay for itself by finding all these millionaire cheats. >

So is the "routine audit" over? >

I just checked r/conservative and it's a nothing-burger apparently. >

Tax returns from all wealthy people contain questionable entry's. No big deal here. They all pay big money for lawyers and CPA's to ensure least amount of tax owed. We may see some foreign accounts but nothing of problem. What we want to see is a balance sheet. How much debt does he hold. How much cash flow does he have. >

Haven't found an accountant willing to go to jail for any body page 1clause 1of the contract that you initial is were you got me fucked up >

Can you imagine if the entire electorate did what drumpf did? It would take years to unfuck the system. Like, what are they going to do? If we don't hold that motherfucker accountable, why the fuck should we hold ourselves accountable? >

Phantom losses >

Why do you rob banks?  Because that’s where the money is. Why do you audit taxpayers with a large number of pass through entities? Because that’s where the money is!! Audit this MF