>

Not as long as insecure zealots continue to tie their fragile identities to guns
I have stopped trying to get people to understand that regulation, licensing and training requirements are the key to a safe gun loving country. These things don’t take away any rights, they just insure more responsibility and education. No one on the right wants to listen.  As a person who is trained and have a concealed carry permit I find myself carrying more often because I no longer trust my fellow citizens.  Gun safety is out the window in the US. >


I have stopped trying to get people to understand that regulation, licensing and training requirements are the key to a safe gun loving country. These things don’t take away any rights,

They do limit rights though. 
Just imagine your theory applied to any other Constitutional right.
Imagine if you had to take a weekend course on the nature of representative democracy and apply for a license before you were allowed to peaceably assemble, or exercise your freedom of speech, or if you had to take a test before you were allowed to vote (as has been tried in the Jim Crow South to disastrous results). Those would be laughed out of court as obvious infringements on one's constitutional rights.
Education and training about both democracy and firearms are indeed important, but making them a legal requirement before those rights can be exercised does indeed limit one's rights. >

You are applying absolutism. These are apples and oranges arguments. Unrestricted firearms infringe my rights to life and liberty. >


Unrestricted firearms infringe my rights to life and liberty.

No they don't >

Yes, they do.