>

I’m betting on No.
For anyone hoping this is going to lead to any sort of criminal offenses for the orange goon, from the article:

If the IRS completes its audit work and validates some of the concerns raised by the report, the likelihood that Trump could subsequently face serious legal trouble — something beyond adjustments or fines — appears to be low. The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, which has been conducting a criminal investigation of Trump since the summer of 2018, has had access to Trump’s tax returns for more than a year and has not charged him.

This fucking guy. >

They've had enough time to correct my tax stuff after it turns out my employer didn't do withholdings for a year and didn't tell me, but I'm just a tiny nobody and it probably took them 5 seconds to come squeeze me for my unemployment funding back.
I dunno, but it seems like they should do the big guys first? Maybe we should spend a little of that defense budget on more IRS guys to do those folks? Maybe?? >

Ours aren’t complicated at all, though. They probably already know exactly what we should be paying, so of course they’re gonna get the easy money. >

Yeah, I still wish they could just let me know what they know about how much I should pay. >

There are cpuntries that do it like that.
Log in, see what they think you owe, confirm or adjust as needed
But of course in the US tax companies lobbied against this >

You can create an account on irs.gov and pull your transcript and see what was reported by third parties. Just FYI. >

Wait HOW? My wife worked for 2 months this year, at a business that opened up this year. They refused to give any paystubs or ANYTHING ever, and are now no longer in Business. Been stressing about the W2 this year due to that... >

Already seeing Trump supporters saying his lengths to not pay taxes are just "smart" and "good business" but then will bemoan "ThE eLiTeS" when celebrities and other rich do the same. 
They love to feel slighted that they pay taxes and imagine that some strawman millionaire like Pelosi (or whoever else on the left) somehow isn't paying taxes. Yet when you get concrete proof that Trump is not paying his fair share, it's crickets. No morals with these people. >

Here in Illinois it's the same thing except they're absolutely outraged that Pritzker pulled toilets out of a home for a lower tax burden. Apparently when a Dem does it it's those dirty Democrats tricksy little hobbitses.  I'm outraged about it too, but at least I'm pissed about both. >

Because it's all a team sport to them and the rules only apply to one side. 
Its the same as how the right only wants to talk about the left leaning people on Epstein's flight log and black book. Just ignore the sea of GOP politicians, donors, and celebs that were also there. Clinton being in the book makes him a monster, but the fact that Epstein had 5 different contact numbers for Trump doesn't make them bat an eye. Lock them all up ffs, just have a shred of consistency. >

Heck, there is literally a photo of Elon Musk with Ghislaine Maxwell, but when you show it to his far-right fans, they’re dead silent. To my recollection, the only response I have seen is basically asking to see Elon’s court documents because seeing him with someone directly involved in trafficking is not an immediate cause for alarm the way it is with, say, Bill Clinton >

I've heard the argument that Ghislaine was forcing herself into the photo with Elon Musk, and it does seem plausible.
Rich and famous people attend events together all the time and that single photo gave barely any context so I think the benefit of the doubt should be given here even if he is a colossal douchebag >

I’m calling bullshit. I heard Trump supporters claim that there couldn’t have been any collusion between the Trump administration and Russia because there were no photos of Trump and Putin together before Trump took office. But here we have Elon with a confirmed sex trafficker and suddenly we shouldn’t be jumping to conclusions? >


I heard Trump supporters claim that....

None of this anecdote of yours has anything to do with the photo of Elon and Ghislaine.

and suddenly we shouldn’t be jumping to conclusions?

No, not suddenly. We should never be jumping to conclusions. That expression is intended as a tautology. >

On the contrary, the same people who support Trump are the same people who support Elon. Both of them were held up as business geniuses saving us from evil liberals >

He claimed Eric as a tax deduction! >

Too bad "mental age" isn't counted for dependents. >

First thing I noticed, I thought he said he didn't take his $400k presidential income.  Sure enough his income goes from $15k to $400k for 4 straight years.   Literally can't trust a word he says.