>

Germany has dragged its feet through the whole conflict
In a winter trench war, these seem likely to be pretty helpful. Mine-clearing tanks might not be as helpful as Russian-soldier-clearing tanks, but its not nothing >

Given that according to the ukrainian government Russia has turned Ukraine into the world's largest minefield, those mine-clearing tanks might be what is necessary to make sure that anyone or anything can "clear russian soldiers". >

Is it just me or is there more Ppl thinking that Germany is the least commited to help Ukraine.
They seem to be clinging to the idea that if they don't upset Russians too much, things will go back to what they were.
Ukraine need tanks and Germany is still only sending the minimum >


Is it just me or is there more Ppl thinking that Germany is the least commited to help Ukraine. 

Idk about what people think, but factually speaking, Germany has provided the second highest total amount of military and financial aid by value, first in Europe. >

Maybe it's the media only reporting the doubt amongst politicians expressing doubts about "escalation"? . >

Possible. "Politician X agrees with what's being done anyway" seldom makes news.
That being said, I can't help but think that comments that, from anywhere else, would be rightly dismissed as "well, there's some idiots everywhere" are being seen by some as an indictment for all of Germany recently for some reason. It's like people remember any critical comment by the most irrelevant politicians sons friends cat, but have amnesia regarding Germanys contributions. >

Germany needs to supply Ukraine with the Leopard 2 tank. Britain will supply the Challenger 2 but there are more Leopard 2s in world. If Germany decides to supply the Leopard 2, Ukraine should hold off on the Challenger 2. Logistically, it's better to have just one type of tank. >

Germany is already the biggest supporter of Ukraine after the US. 
Some other country can chime in as well, especially if that country isn't busy with leading VJTF.