>

It completely ignores what trans people want, misunderstands why the issue is an issue in the first place, and has no thought towards safety for trans people, practicality for anyone, and is seemingly meant more as a way to let cis people stop thinking about the issue than to actually solve anything.
Tldr: the Republican-appointed judges in the majority said the Republican policy didn't violate federal law. >


Tldr: the Republican-appointed judges in the majority blatantly ignored federal law and said the Republican policy didn't violate federal law. >

Blatantly violated federal anti discrimination laws. When are people going to realize Republicans don't care whether a law is legal on a federal level or not? The absolutely vile cruelty is the point. They want members of the LGBTQ+ community dead. >

*Christian Taliban appeals tribuneral >

I think any state that issues trans bathroom bans should be legally required to have an alternative bathroom trans people can use. Single stalls, teachers restrooms. I think that is a happy medium and both sides can feel comfortable. And before anyone says well that's not right, the bathroom issue is a distractive talking point. My idea addresses it, and makes it stop being one.