>

Not available in my country appearantly... 
And if don't have a VPN.
Which scene is it ?
Wasn't there a famous incident in Australia a while ago where they tried putting some sort of advanced verification on porn and a 16 year old cracked it after just 4 hours? >

In the legislative hearings, there was a lot of discussion about very young kids (age 6-10) accidentally stumbling on porn by searching what they thought was innocuous terms. So I guess the idea is that the law will stop those kids from being exposed to porn. Obviously the older kids will find a way around it. >

It’s thinly veiled Christian sharia law under the guise of “protecting the children” >

The law being “prove you’re 18 before you watch porn” is hardly the worst thing those nuts are trying to push through. >

It’s about collecting personal data of porn watchers. “A list of sinners” in other words. >

Slippery slope and all that. Plus it guarantees to deal with political opposition. Just reveal all their porn habits and you've destroyed you're political opponents, making you the only avaliable candidate, thus guaranteeing an automatic win without needing to have a vote at all. Then eventually they'll ask the population to vote on doing away with voting because only they are the good guys and no one else. Yada Yada. >

“Are you 18 years of age or older?”
… yes?
“Welcome to PornHub!” >

More meaningfully, they now have to keep a record that they verified the age -and identity- of every visitor to the site who might have been from LA. And of course they keep track of what that visitor watches. They now have a list of everyone's favorite kinks, tied to a convenient name-and-address mandated by law, for sale to any interested buyers. >

VPN sales quadruple in Louisiana. More at 11. >

How many other places have tried and failed, making nothing but a privacy minefield for legal adults? >

“Please enter your age to continue reading about this cocktail recipe by using our sliding date and year options.” >

Oh my god those are the worst!
The most egregiously awful one I’ve ever seen started on the current date and made you arrow back one month at a time until you reached your birthday. Which meant you had to tap (this was on a phone) the arrow a minimum of 252 times (21 years * 12 months). And that’s only if you decide to  just the minimum necessary to get through, not give your actual birthday. 
After tapping a couple dozen times to confirm that it really was that stupid I decided I didn’t care anywhere near enough to tap over 200 more times to enter a legal date.