>

Shooting straight up in the air is the only "celebratory": gunfire I've ever heard of and that's wildly reckless. I want to say shooting up in the air is the "definition" of this term. 
l even if you don't hit anything or anything and that's a good thing but I feel like a case for reckless endangerment could have already been made for that and this law seems a little bit superfluous.  Not complaining I'm just saying by default I'm pretty sure celebratory gunfire is always illegal.
You kain't take muh freedoms from me! Keep that talk to yerself! >

I think celebratory gunfire (firing straight up into the air) is more common in the inner cities than out in MAGA territory, so you probably need to add a "homie" or something in there. >

You are probably right there, and I still don't see the point in it but there we are anyhow. >

Me either. Everything comes down somewhere. >

Terminal velocity >

So it can be terminal. >

Ah I see, that was a joke. >

Firing into the air is FREEZE PEACH!
I literally wonder how long it will take for this to become an actual courtroom argument.. >

"Your honour, we was celebrating with guns, which is our God given right to bare arms as per the second amendment & muh freedom' >

What if I celebrate something by going hunting or to a shooting range?  Do I just not tell the ones giving hunting licenses?  Will the shooting range employees get in trouble if I am caught? >

Celebratory gunfire has an accepted definition.  Shooting up in the fire basically.
This is one of the few laws that I think everyone will agree is actual common sense.
The only acceptable time in my opinion to shoot up in the air is using birdshot with a shotgun in the right situation and circumstances and even then every pellet has a lawyer attached to it if anything goes wrong. >

Damn cancel culture and the woke agenda! Thanks Obama! 😡