comment: >
  
  The only thing that should be banned is pornography. Because that’s not literature. Literature should be open to everyone in all forms because we learn from what we disagree with.
context: Any books in particular you have in mind?
  Without examples it's difficult to know what you really mean - "educational books that have been censored" is a bit vague, could be anything. >
  
  I agree that censoring good educational books is a bad thing, but the issue is who gets to decide what we consider "good" and "educational"? What if the person/people chosen to do that job has their own agenda? >
  
  My thoughts exactly who determines what is good or quality books? Also does age appropriatness count? What I may feel is a good book for learning another may feel much differently... >
  
  What defines educational? Does history count?  Can we publish a book about how the northern states plotted to control or destroy the south which valiantly fought back to preserve their way of life? Would censoring that be okay? >
  
  That's not history. >
  
  So you are ready to censor anything that doesn't fit your worldview? Writing history is all about making decisions, i can assure you the historical documentation is there, but what a historian you and i say is right calls it propaganda.  But if someone doesn't do that, presents it as written, then either you censor them or allow their viewpoints to spread. >
  
  It's not my worldview: it's just bullshit. >
  
  Did a bot write this?