comment: >
  
  They did change the year. But they forgot to change references to the “tyrannical Presidential regime” (about Obama) in the platform, so their 2020 platform ended up denouncing the Trump regime.
context: “Raises worries”.  They were planning 2 years of Hunter Biden investigations.  How were they not worried before? “Confirms” is the word you wanted, not raises.
  Edit: punctuation >
  
  2 years of Hunters dick pics. They were obsessed with Clinton's dick to. These guys just love investigating big white hung dicks and what they do with them.  
  Dont worry about the absolute crooks and wanna be dictators in our party, let's get to the bottom of these naughty dicks >
  
  It's because that kind of stuff worked so well with Clinton. Be outrageousness of the  stain on the dress and what not. Sex scandals have been used to shame Democrats into quitting since then. 
  S***, look what they did to Katie Hill. That should have been a crime but instead Republicans shamed her into stepping down from her position. >
  
  Damn i just looked into Katie hill. Accused of having an affair, admitted a different affair then resigned, daily mail published her nudes, she sued, ordered to pay 200k to daily mail then declared bankruptcy last year.
  Damn >
  
  Why did she have to pay 200k to the Daily Mail? >
  
  Their legal costs >
  
  Hold on so they published nude photos of her, she sued them and then had to pay their legal costs?   Wtf >
  
  In December 2020, Hill filed a lawsuit against her ex-husband, the Daily Mail, and RedState over "non consensual porn".[63] On April 7, 2021, a judge ruled in favor of the Daily Mail, finding that the photos are protected as "a matter of public issue or public interest" under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Hill's attorneys say they plan to appeal the decision.[64][65][66] The judge also ordered Hill to pay roughly $220,000 in fees to the Daily Mail and a couple of journalists.[67]  
  Yup. Aren't judges amazing sometimes? >
  
  Is love to hear the judge’s explanation as to why nude pictures are  "a matter of public issue or public interest" 
  Like seriously WTF. >
  
  It’s the anniversary of the insurrection, and you’re telling me this shit show is “raising questions”? >
  
  Also, didn't they remove all the metal detectors from the building? >
  
  
  "I think they need to be removed from the Capitol, filled with Tannerite and blown up."
  
  Lauren Boebert, the child. >
  
  The cursed child >
  
  The child who (shouldn't have) lived. >
  
  Like the two children she aborted? >
  
  The word the “freedom house caucus” would prefer to use is “murdered”. Except it now is about one of them and suddenly it is her body her choice. But for everyone else! >
  
  That's because they believe "The only moral abortion is my abortion." >
  
  The people who are voting against McCarthy indicated all along they'd do so. Republican leadership refused to develop alternate solutions. Instead Republican leadership just assumed the Redwave victory would be so large that it wouldn't matter. They misjudged. 
  Another Major problem is that Republicans have no policy agenda. Rather they are a party entirely built around personality branding. McCarthy doesn't care what does or doesn't get accomplished in the next Congress. He only cares that he gets to be Speaker. Likewise folks like MTG & Gaetz only care about booking podcast appearances and raising money. 
  When the fight is for fame and not policy no amount of compromise or concession is enough. >
  
  
  Rather they are a party entirely built around personality branding.
  
  Well stated. >
  
  Someone called them congressional kardashians >
  
  I prefer "legislative terrorists" >
  
  Yeah but do they legislate >
  
  When it comes to hurting women or minorities? You betcha! >
  
  But they didn’t legislate anything.  They let the Supreme Court overturn Roe.  Since they have tried to let the people decide like in KY and the people have shot down that BS and voted for choice. >
  
  Worry? The GOP hasn't been interested in governance in decades. We know exactly what we're going to get: phony investigations (and likely a phony impeachment as payback), government shutdowns, and lots of grandstanding about "illegals" while blocking all attempts at immigration reform. >
  
  And blocking all attempts at tax reform, healthcare reform, financial regulation, environmental regulation, etc….. >
  
  Why would they want to help their constituents? They’ll vote for them no matter what. 
  As the NRA lady so eloquently put it about Hershel Walker “ it doesn’t matter if he paid for a 1000 abortions he’s a Republican“(might be off a little but very close) >
  
  
  (might be off a little but very close)
  
  It was even more histrionic than that!
  "I don't care if Herschel Walker paid to abort endangered baby eagles. I want control of the Senate!" >
  
  American politics is beneath satire 🤣 >
  
  Republicans can't govern.  They haven't been able to for decades. >
  
  They had literally no platform during the last presidential election.  It’s not just that they can’t govern, they don’t even want to. >
  
  They literally copied and pasted their previous platform at the last convention and forgot to change the year. Not even joking.