comment: >
  
  So you are ready to censor anything that doesn't fit your worldview? Writing history is all about making decisions, i can assure you the historical documentation is there, but what a historian you and i say is right calls it propaganda.  But if someone doesn't do that, presents it as written, then either you censor them or allow their viewpoints to spread.
context: Any books in particular you have in mind?
  Without examples it's difficult to know what you really mean - "educational books that have been censored" is a bit vague, could be anything. >
  
  I agree that censoring good educational books is a bad thing, but the issue is who gets to decide what we consider "good" and "educational"? What if the person/people chosen to do that job has their own agenda? >
  
  My thoughts exactly who determines what is good or quality books? Also does age appropriatness count? What I may feel is a good book for learning another may feel much differently... >
  
  What defines educational? Does history count?  Can we publish a book about how the northern states plotted to control or destroy the south which valiantly fought back to preserve their way of life? Would censoring that be okay? >
  
  That's not history.