comment: >
  
  They couldn't even prepare a house speaker so who in their right minds would think that they could "fix Congress"? 
  Baffling timeline
context: They don't intend to fix anything. They want to use their power to intimidate and stifle investigations into their crimes. >
  
  I assume they mean that other definition of the word 'fix'. >
  
  Republicans are the ones who broke Congress.  They have no intention of fixing it.
  The media continues to pretend that these are reasonable people. >
  
  Why does The NY Times have to treat bad actors as if they have integrity? >
  
  
  History suggests that the procedural plans of the new House Republican majority are likely to lead to more gridlock and legislative instability, not less.
  
  Large if correct >
  
  Well there’s an effen surprise! >
  
  That implies they want to fix congress. >
  
  They probably do as long as it's: the illegal or underhand influencing of the outcome of something such as a race, match, or election. >
  
  GOP is about hot air.  They complain, boast, and blame.  Nothing more. >
  
  And obstruct. Unfortunately, theyre good at that one >
  
  When they say fix, they don't mean repair. >
  
  Fixing it isn't. Turning it into an embarrassment is. >
  
  fixing? >
  
  
  The illegal or underhand influencing of the outcome of something such as a race, match, or election. >
  
  “Dog looks at manual, but flying a plane isn’t so easy”