comment: >
  
  Are you sure that the user who posted this article wrote the article? It doesn't seem as though that is the case to me because they do post articles from other media sources Than The Daily Beast as well as by different authors than this one.
  Also, I am not running into a paywall. Is a paywall actually an issue that others are experiencing?
context: This must be that civil war they've been talking about coming.... >
  
  Man if this kills fox news too I might not survive it.... >
  
  Pass the popcorn. >
  
  I love this. They've purged, alienated, and chased everyone else away with their obnoxious nastiness and now there's no one left to hate but each other. >
  
  Lol imagine what tucker calls his viewers. >
  
  Losers and suckers. >
  
  "47% of them are leeches" >
  
  He did say that didn’t he? And the percentage is probably much higher among his viewers, many of whom are on SSI and Medicaid, but they probably didn’t realize he was talking about them. >
  
  They weren't talking about me, but the other old assholes who just sit around all day and don't do nothing. I got hobbies! I just went fly fishin couple years ago with my son, an intied a couple flies for m'granson when he got borned. It's no good to do nothin all day. A man's gotta have purpose an use his hands >
  
  Most racists have a black friend. He’s one of the good ones, not like those other n**s. >
  
  There was an interesting article, recently, about tension between the primetime hosts and Fox News' own internal polling team. Turns out, every time they released a Fox News poll this past election cycle people turned off Fox News. So they amplified these wildly inaccurate polls predicting a 'red wave', queued up a bunch of their primetime talking heads, and were completely taken aback by the results. >
  
  Fox has one prime time host going one way and another the other. I can’t help but think they’re just hedging their bets because nobody knows where this flaming circus train is headed. By appealing to both sides in separate shows, they always give some of their rabid viewers what they want to hear without actually taking the issue of their party being in chaos head-on. >
  
  you are correct sir.  they tryin to figure out who to back but its not discernible  at the moment. hell imagine if mccarthy and co go scorched earth on the Freedom Caucus for fuckin shit up or better yet they remain a fucked up thorn in their sides for two years shitting even on basic gop wins >
  
  So, it looks like Kevin is getting close after likely promising absolutely anything to get votes. I'm not sure he'll get those last few votes though. Will be interesting to see if that causes any changes in the Fox programming or any of the hosts suddenly have a change of heartlessness. >
  
  When them dudes get back tonight all he will need is i think two or three to peel away. im sure they are watching to get their marching orders or direction and if we are lucky someone says something off and blows the whole deal. then again i get the feeling every time they get up and bloviate during the votes all they are doing is getting soundbites for their next campaign so they could be putting on a show.
  ​
  I am interested in the murmurs of the republican moderates gettin uneasy with the various changes.  they could just be bullshitting but ya never know. >
  
  I'm waiting for Kevin to get the role, and a random rep to challenge him the next day (one of his concessions) so the whole circus starts over again. If he gets in, I guarantee he's going to live to regret it. >
  
  yep.  soon as he slights bobo or whoever the fuck else its on.  What if there is a pro tempore tho? i saw someone post once theres one they can do what trump did and have them run the show while they do show trials.  Im assuming one of the last six are holding out for that sweet spot and why there are murmurs from moderate reps about shit goin too far. oh whom i kidding when this shit goes down theyll throw their hands in the air and blame dems. >
  
  So now Trump is an "establishment" Republican?  Wow! >
  
  Of course Trump is an establishment Republican. They’ve all been lining up to cradle his balls for almost 8 years. The head neo Nazi is the leader of the party of neo Nazis. >
  
  No question he has become "established", but God help us if that is now "establishment"! >
  
  Any one else worried that the price of popcorn may go up? >
  
  Well I, for one, am OUT. >
  
  I'm a busy guy. Really, really busy. I've got a wife, kids, a full time job, and a side hustle, and I just don't have enough time in the day. I don't.
  But I watched this three times because it. makes. my. heart. so. happy. JOY! It brings me joy. Smiling ear-to-ear joy.
  Ronald Reagan had a rule: "Never speak ill of another Republican." In other words--"our strength is in our unity." Not "our message," or "our ideas," or--ha!--"our policies." Republicans need to fall in line, because without party loyalty, they've got nothing. NOTHING.
  Watching them fight like this brings joy to my heart.
  So--hey, Republicans! You like with dogs, you get fleas. Enjoy your new team members. They're all yours. They're going to destroy you, and you deserve them. >
  
  I’m wrapping up maternity leave. I’ve watched a lot of streaming shit the last several weeks. Like, A LOT, and this has been the most entertaining week of TV hands down 😂 >
  
  LPT: If you don't want to sign up just to read the article, search the headline at yahoo news. They run all the beast pieces and don't require a subscription. >
  
  Imagine being called a moron by Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson? People with 3 names are annoying enough, but Tucker says hold my TV dinner. >
  
  Doesn’t most everyone have 3 names? >
  
  Typically "three-name-people" would be like, Olivia Newton John or Sarah Michelle Gellar. They're known by using 3 names. Tucker Carlson is a standard 2 namer, despite technically having more names because nobody, including himself, try to make his middle names a thing.
  So you're correct and the poster picked the possibly the least controversial thing about Tucker Carlson to get upset about. >
  
  apparently, fuck thedailybeast, because it pops up with a "mcafee" "warning" that I can't close. there's no exit from the pop-up, and any click takes you to some bullshit site. literally unreadable article >
  
  Right above your comment, someone posted the non paywall sure. It was a good read. >
  
  grassyass. I'll check it out >
  
  Here’s the part where he says moron 
  “Another one of the buffoons in the clip you just saw went further and called the whole thing terrorism, which is the remorseless use of violence against a civilian population to effect a political goal,” Carlson huffed, adding that Domenech was part of the “moron community.” (Of course, this is far from the first time that Carlson has taken public shots at his Fox News colleagues. Memorably, his mockery of veteran Fox News anchor Shepard Smith—who defended another Fox News personality that Carlson ridiculed on-air—led to Smith’s departure.) >
  
  Couldn’t happen to a group of shittier people than the fascist propagandists at Faux ‘News’. >
  
  "Fox & Friend’s host Brian Kilmeade’s description of the holdout group made them absolutely furious. Grousing on Thursday morning about the continued stalemate, Kilmeade fumed that “this is how insincere the insurrectionists are.” Realizing almost immediately how loaded that term is, especially on the right, Kilmeade tried to take it back.
  “Probably shouldn't use that word,” he scrambled. “The people that don't wanna vote for Kevin McCarthy.”
  He got it right the first time. >
  
  Heh, Tucker calling someone a moron. That's cute. >
  
  Nothing worse than being called a moron by an idiot. As bad as the kettle calling the skillet cast iron... >
  
  It is hard to admit, but sometimes Tucker is right.  
  broken clocks and whatnot. >
  
  I thought we agreed to call Fox Russian State News. >
  
  So THIS is what it takes to expose their BS? >
  
  I’m gonna need a Mini series to piece this back together. >
  
  Wait for the inevitable Netflix documentary >
  
  Do you guys see how 'both sides' are exactly the same? >
  
  This is sarcasm, right? >
  
  I don't know, some people say it with a straight face. Republicans prove their incompetence over and over and somehow the takeaway is "aren't they both just terrible?"
  No they're not! It's objectively different. It's absolutely the difference between night and day in how people conduct themselves across the political spectrum. 
  One side has some level of decency and standards, people resign when they get caught doing bad things. The other side has yet to hit rock bottom apparently. There is apparently no low the Republicans won't sink to. >
  
  Centrism is just fascist apologia. People only say "both sides" to condemn progress or defend regressives. >
  
  This was not the civil war they were hoping for. >
  
  That’s the moron calling the moron a moron. >
  
  
  Tucker openly calling one colleague a “moron.”
  
  Pot, meet kettle. >
  
  They can’t vote on a speaker but they want to run the country? I don’t understand. Lol >
  
  Maybe we’ll finally get a clearer picture of the differences between republicans and far right >
  
  If only such a camera exists! >
  
  I do love the standing up to The Murdoch’s. >
  
  Article behind a paywall. Can someone post it? >
  
  Calling someone on Fox a moron is very low hanging fruit. >
  
  I never saw the ~~movie~~ actual pain and suffering of Americans and cared. But I did see the house that it bought >
  
  First time I've ever agreed with him >
  
  Takes one to know one. >
  
  God I hate republicans. They make conservatives look horrendous