comment: >
  
  The Russians have extended supply lines through heavily mined ukranian lands. A few well placed artillery shells easily causes disruptions.
context: Posting Friday on Telegram, Haidai said that in the first three hours of the cease-fire, Russian forces shelled Ukrainian positions 14 times and stormed one settlement three times. 
  
  How can something "falte", that never existed in the first place? Putin saying things means less than my cat meowing. My cat is decisive about going outside about 40% of the time AT LEAST, whereas Putin is just making wind 100% of the time. >
  
  The Ukrainians never agreed to it either.  Which I don't blame them for.  And as much of an ass as Putin is, I'm not really sure "not upholding a ceasefire the other side didn't agree too" is really something to fault him for.
  Kidnapping a bunch of Ukrainian children, on the other hand... >
  
  Exact reporting differs from one article to another, but from what I understood, Putin didn't really negotiate the cease-fire - he just announced it. >
  
  There never was a ceasefire. Full stop.
  Ukraine never agreed to, and is under no obligation to honor a ceasefire in a war which they're defending themselves against an aggressor.
  All this talk of Offering ceasefire is just more propaganda from a Genocidal terrorist regime that's trying to play itself off as the reasonable party.  Right after they got done washing their hands from raping babies and castrating POWs.
  Russia is desperate for a breather, Ukraine is under no obligation to give them one,  And Ukraine is within their rights to never have diplomatic relations or deals with Russia ever again.  Every promise, treaty and agreement made by Russia has been broken, Russia invaded them. Russia never had any intention of honoring a ceasefire. It's all talk. Russia acheived the monumental task of making even the Americans and Chinese look more credible with the amount of bold faced lies they spout.
  Russia in Ukraine's eyes is pure evil, you dont negotiate with pure evil, you kill it >
  
  Putin declared a cease fire anyways, then Russia violated it immediately.
  This isn't propaganda. >
  
  Falte? >
  
  Things ae moving so apidly that thee's no time for r's >
  
  Cowection: thee should not be an ‘r’ in “for” eithe because things awe moving too wapidly. >
  
  He has a wife you know... >
  
  Oh no, the Russians killed op! >
  
  I heard that if you say Putin's name out loud, he'll sneak into your room and push you out the win >
  
  Cease fire?
  You mean Russia's rejected empty posturing. >
  
  Ukraine never agreed to it... >
  
  That didn't stop Putin from declaring one anyways.
  And after he did, the Russian army was the first to attack that day. >
  
  What cease-fire? Didn't Ukraine never agree to it? >
  
  Putin declared one anyway, after Ukraine refused, then the Russian army launched the first attack that day. >
  
  “…Said to Falte”
  Nice. >
  
  the fighting will get a lot easier as soon as the weather warms up. Even if the power goes out, ukrainians won't have to worry as much. I think ukraine will be able to finish the war, fully repel. the invasion in the summer. The outcome will be determined by whose competency at war increases more as the war goes on. There is a risk that russia will eventually become competent enough to win. Ukraine needs to consider transforming the country for long term defense. Create permanent defense barracks that stand armed and ready and will repel forces no matter how many they send. with enough anti aircraft and anti missile defenses, forces will never get through. >
  
  Defending territory is easier than taking territory. It's why Putin and Russia have miscalculated their advances in Ukraine earlier, but it's also what Ukraine wants to do now, retake territory from Russia. Russia is digging in in certain parts this winter. It's no wonder advances have slowed down. Making a difference now is very tough, the increased Russian defenses will complicate things when temperature rise again...