comment: >
  
  I actually watched the whole two day thing.  At no point did they even come close to providing anything close to evidence to the actual claims they were charged with proving.  Their main argument was the whole 19" ballot on 20" paper thing which had a very plausible explanation, a printer setting, which in the end didn't matter because the ballots were duplicated onto 20" paper and then tabulated.   There were some chain of custody issues raised that I think the state should work to better define and document, but again, even if they could prove the counts in between collection places and the place where they were counted were off, it doesnt even come close to proving intentional malfeasance with intent to change the outcome.  What was particularly fun was the Mike Pillow rep who was angry for no reason at all, who proved nothing, provided nothing, made a bunch of claims without evidence and just basically got all ripped on the stand for no reason whatsoever.
context: Poor thing. That Lake done dried up. >
  
  Another poster referred to her as Lake Inferior. LOL >
  
  Brilliant!