comment: >
  
  Don't forget Charlie Kirk at Turning Points USA sent 80 buses full of people to the Jan 6 insurrection. Sure, not everyone participated in the riot, but thousands did.
context: Does the report say anything about the secret service texts ? That’s what I am most curious about. >
  
  I don’t know what your talking about, but since I see no reply’s it only further peaks my curiosity >
  
  the texts from secret service agents that went "missing" after a "routine" device purge happened during the presidential change over.
  i don't know if it was in the report, but that was a pretty "convenient" breach of governmental records keeping. >
  
  To be fair… I’d comfortably say 4/5 government employees have no idea how to comply with records mandates.
  (Source: work for government… issue phones… no idea) >
  
  the guy decommissioning old phones, though? >
  
  It’s not like there is even a message backup in most cases. You wipe the phone and send it back to your managing authority to turn in to GSA or some equivalent. Honestly, this is really a government wide problem as far as national archives go.
  Edit: factory reset, not wipe… but, tomato/tomatoe >
  
  It's a missed opportunity to be sure, and doesn't make any sense. >
  
  The focus of the committee report appears to be on people who were part of the government... and Ginni Thomas was technically only an activist who was tangentially organizing the events and people who would then go on to be the rioters.
  This does not mean that she won't be a target of Jack Smith's investigation though. >
  
  I agree with you — Jack Smith will be able to follow a lot of threads and unlike previous joke special counsels (Ken Starr and John Dunham), Smith has a wide remit, documented criminality, and a vast array of background investigative material to work with. Ginni Thomas probably believes she’s above the law and immune from scrutiny because of her marriage to Clarence Thomas, but I have a feeling Jack Smith already has her on the radar and could — quite possibly — mention the refusal by Justice Thomas to recuse himself in the case involving January 6 records from the White House. >
  
  Doubtful.  The powerful will pervert the outcome.  See: Mueller. >
  
  See Barr. >
  
  Barr could be in charge by the time things are completed.  If I’m not mistaken, we all saw the crime on TV in real time, and no one organizing the violence has been arrested let alone charged. >
  
  Wasn’t Stuart Rhodes just convicted of sedition like a month ago?
  They have to get the people on the bottom and work their way up.