comment: >
  
  This sounds righteous now but during Trump’s term the left wasn’t complaining about nationwide injunctions.
context: Ah, the weekly It's Time For Democrats To Get Serious headline. >
  
  If a Judge in say the Fifth Circuit rules against something, perhaps it should only be lawful in that Circuit. Just think how pissed off student loan borrowers would be that they would have to pay off thier loans, but the borrowers in the Ninth Circuit did not have to pay off the loans. >
  
  Gosh I wish it worked that way. The 5th circuit activists can go shove it >
  
  Trump broke the law. It is now time to prosecute him. >
  
  Injunction junction, what's your function? >
  
  Blocking up bills and Biden’s agenda >
  
  The mashup I’ve been waiting 45 years for. God bless us, every one. >
  
  I dunno... I remember just a short time ago when these same sorts of injunctions were preventing Trump from ruling by executive order. If you want to block nationwide injunctions, it might feel good in the short term, but there is going to be a time in the near future where you probably want to have that back. >
  
  Trump would require a ham fisted blanket block, biden would do well with a nuanced change in how these cases are ruled on. >
  
  The judges don't have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions. The Government needs to stop allowing it, and arrest Judges that attempt it for Insurrection, as it is a Judicial Coup. >
  
  
  The judges don't have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions.
  
  Do you have a source for this? >
  
  There are 13 Federal Circuits that Only Have Authority in their own Jurisdictions. Only SCOTUS can issue Nationwide Injunctions. If the corrupt 5th Circuit had Nationwide Authority, Abortions and Birth Control and many other things would be banned across the country. >
  
  Jurisdiction applies to their ability to hear certain cases and make precedent from them and only their jurisdiction. However, that does not mean they lack the authority to set nationwide injunctions. 
  
  Only SCOTUS can issue Nationwide Injunctions
  
  Again, please share a source that demonstrates this. Because courts have been issuing nationwide injunctions for quite a while now which hasn't been stopped by the Supreme Court. >
  
  Why would the court work to reduce its power? The ENTIRE GOP strategy for a quarter century has been to subvert democracy through court appointments because the judiciary has no functioning checks on its power.