comment: >
  
  Quality candidates are useless without quality voters.
context: You have to have quality views to get quality candidates. Trash beliefs, trash people. >
  
  Yep, Trump's shit candidates that did so bad in November all beat what they put up in the primaries. He was full of himself in the spring, especially when Cheney lost. >
  
  Dems had a strategy to promote trash GOP candidates, because they are easy to beat. I don't endorse the practice. I think we're lucky it worked this cycle. But I wouldn't count on a repeat. >
  
  Yep, I agree. I'm glad it worked, but that gamble was a little too dang close for my comfort. If it goes wrong - total and utter nightmare. >
  
  I felt nauseous being a Michigander. I live on the west side, and the support for Tudor Dixon was definitely there. So happy Whitmer remained, and a lot of other maga nut jobs weren’t elected >
  
  Same here. >
  
  I noticed that he didn't give an example. >
  
  That would be giving people expectations to hold him to and we can't have that. >
  
  No, I'm not clicking on a Murdoch Media outlet! >
  
  how are they gonna have 'quality candidates' when all they have to choose from are republicans? >
  
  it's desantis. it was always going to be desantis. >
  
  Sad thought that someone who helped ruin a state is the frontrunner. >
  
  Also his pro trump campaign ads are cringe af
  watch at your own discretion >
  
  "We're going to do everything we can to to to get Herschel Walker elected."
  -Mitch McConnell >
  
  In other words: McConnell looks forward to the next limp dick to coddle. >
  
  There are no "quality candidates" on the right. Literally none of them. They're all traitors. Their voters, too. >
  
  Trump has outlived his usefulness to the Republican Party >
  
  Lol.  
  No such thing. Someone wearing a better fitting suit but still waging garbage culture wars and being an obstructionist asshole….is still a shit candidate.