comment: >
  
  The in-laws were all very complimentary about how modern the speech was. 
  Modern. A King.
context: King Charles can pay tribute to deez nuts >
  
  Now THAT’S funny >
  
  Abolish the monarchy.
  They bring the world nothing.  They fuck kids, wear stupid clothes and waste money and attention on their privileged lifestyle.  Then they rub it in how untouchable and other worldly they are.  Fuck them and fuck all the Eton toffs who suck the life and soul out of the UK.  They are not inspired by God and are not better than us and his hypocritical "Christmas message" for the poors should go unheard. >
  
  Counterpoint: restore the monarchy.  The English throne has been occupied by frauds since the great treason of 1688.  Get rid of the pretenders and bring back the true king.  Quickly Return Stuart! >
  
  Tbh I'm still a bit salty about the Normans.  The English throne belongs to the Anglo-Saxons. >
  
  You may have a defensible argument, but . . . is there any currently extant descendant of Harold Godwinson who can lay credible claim to the throne through primogeniture, either Salic, semi-Salic, or absolute? >
  
  Whew. These comments are viscous and mean.
  I don’t pay attention to royalty here as an American, but people sound like they are out for blood! >
  
  We should have guillotined all these inbred cunts while we had the chance. >
  
  Royal League of Cousinfuckers, assemble! >
  
  Was Montgomery Burns’ voice modeled after his? >
  
  I would never bow. Get fucked you inbred "monarchs". >
  
  Donald J Trump to be president of the republic of Great Britain. Cromwell would be proud >
  
  Privileged beyond belief we in U.K. need a Republic get rid of Lords and Lady’s the Ruling Establishment and Public Schools. Start with the Tory battery farm Eton. >
  
  Donald Trump to be president of Great Britain it is. >
  
  Fuck right off, chuckie.
  Charles Entertainment Cheese gets more respect from me than you ever will.
  You’re Fuckin clown shoes bud >
  
  The monarchy is as useless and interesting as the clueless drones that give a damn towards anything they say or do. >
  
  There isn't much excuse for a monarchy these days, but it looks to me like Charles wants to go out with a bang. He was born to be king in his own mind, and the overhang of his marriages, his insufferable children and their nauseous lives, and his ridiculous mother are no great part of that. I think he intends to challenge the British class system, its racism and inequalities, the destruction of the planet, and other things he is prevented by law from doing. That speech could turn out to be the last sop to convention you'll hear from him. He's been speaking directly to his intentions in one way or another all his life. >
  
  How can he be king and challenge the british class system?  He is sitting on top of the whole pile of privilege and pomp.
  How can he challenge inequality, when he is the richest, laziest, most pampered human there is?
  Do you really believe this hypocrite will save the poors? >
  
  Those are interesting questions, and it is to be hoped you will find answers to them. They lie just behind your assumptions. But to answer your final question, no, of course not. That must be left to many other hypocrites, and the poor themselves. >
  
  Did he declare war on the EU?
  (Obscure reference… hoping somebody gets it…)