comment: >
  
  Yeah, it's bad. It's targeting asexual marriages and possibly same-sex marriage (since sex, to them, is defined as vaginal intercourse), but it could easily be geared toward wives that won't have sex on demand. Expect marital rape to be effectively de-criminalized to make this work because those two laws would conflict with each other.  
  This, combined with a contraception and abortion ban, forces married women to get pregnant or they could be prosecuted by the state.
context: Yeah. The SC doesn’t care, it’ll be banned or “up to the states bs” >
  
  Having medical decisions in the hands of 9 unchecked individuals without any medical knowledge or training is grossly irresponsible. Our country is doomed unless we do something about this. >
  
  It’s about forcing their morality on the majority because they can. >
  
  Their "morality" is that sex should be shameful and risky for women. >
  
  That's just the first step. Once women stop having sex and keep to themselves, the American right will remove their capability of independence (employment, education, bank accounts, the vote, etc.) so they're forced to marry off, which they're currently trying to do by taking away workers' rights broadly and any kind of oversight regarding the wage gap and employer discrimination. They'll also punish childless marriages, which they're currently trying to do with sexless marriage.  
  So yes, Republicans are pure fucking evil. >
  
  What about sexless marriage? What?