comment: >
  
  Like George Santos?
context: You have to have quality views to get quality candidates. Trash beliefs, trash people. >
  
  Yep, Trump's shit candidates that did so bad in November all beat what they put up in the primaries. He was full of himself in the spring, especially when Cheney lost. >
  
  Dems had a strategy to promote trash GOP candidates, because they are easy to beat. I don't endorse the practice. I think we're lucky it worked this cycle. But I wouldn't count on a repeat. >
  
  Yep, I agree. I'm glad it worked, but that gamble was a little too dang close for my comfort. If it goes wrong - total and utter nightmare. >
  
  I felt nauseous being a Michigander. I live on the west side, and the support for Tudor Dixon was definitely there. So happy Whitmer remained, and a lot of other maga nut jobs weren’t elected >
  
  Same here. >
  
  I noticed that he didn't give an example. >
  
  That would be giving people expectations to hold him to and we can't have that. >
  
  No, I'm not clicking on a Murdoch Media outlet! >
  
  how are they gonna have 'quality candidates' when all they have to choose from are republicans? >
  
  it's desantis. it was always going to be desantis. >
  
  Sad thought that someone who helped ruin a state is the frontrunner. >
  
  Also his pro trump campaign ads are cringe af
  watch at your own discretion >
  
  "We're going to do everything we can to to to get Herschel Walker elected."
  -Mitch McConnell >
  
  In other words: McConnell looks forward to the next limp dick to coddle. >
  
  There are no "quality candidates" on the right. Literally none of them. They're all traitors. Their voters, too. >
  
  Trump has outlived his usefulness to the Republican Party >
  
  Lol.  
  No such thing. Someone wearing a better fitting suit but still waging garbage culture wars and being an obstructionist asshole….is still a shit candidate. >
  
  Quality candidates are useless without quality voters. >
  
  But he would still support him if he's the candidate. >
  
  Trump is a symptom not a cause. The GOP doesn't have quality candidates because it is a trash party with trash beliefs that don't give a shit about anyone but themselves. >
  
  So they're going to find another bellicose, intolerant white man and claim he's a quality candidate. Got it. >
  
  But if he gets the nomination McConnel will vote for him! >
  
  I wonder if he knows something's coming for Trump, and is trying to get ahead of it... >
  
  Anyone paying attention can see Trump has self destructed, and the  GOP screwed up by promoting his grift and lawlessness. >
  
  Quality candidates? Like Matt Gaetz, MTG, and any of the dozens of other hate-spewing reactionary bigots? >
  
  I am sure he will be checking under every Lilly pad. >
  
  Nobody of quality would be a republican, so I’m calling bs >
  
  
  vows GOP will look for ‘quality candidates’
  
  Didn't McConnell back that guy who claimed to be against abortion while he had forced his wife to have several abortions? He's got a real eye for quality indeed. >
  
  Fuck you McConnell.  What he means is "quality" candidates that will succeed where Trump failed while maintaining the hateful rhetoric and hatred towards minorities, women and poor people. >
  
  Garbage in. Garbage out. >
  
  Has anybody told Mitch the obvious yet: motherfucker you aren't a quality candidate. >
  
  In 2015 every Republican in a position of meaningful influence said Trump was an unfit conman. To a person nearly all of them supported Trump once Trump got the nomination. McConnell's words don't mean anything. Mitch complained about "candidates quality" during this past midterm yet his superpac still gave $14 million to Hershel Walker's campaign..