comment: >
  
  The only thing the damn church cares about is money and power.
context: Yeah. The SC doesn’t care, it’ll be banned or “up to the states bs” >
  
  Having medical decisions in the hands of 9 unchecked individuals without any medical knowledge or training is grossly irresponsible. Our country is doomed unless we do something about this. >
  
  It’s about forcing their morality on the majority because they can. >
  
  Their "morality" is that sex should be shameful and risky for women. >
  
  That's just the first step. Once women stop having sex and keep to themselves, the American right will remove their capability of independence (employment, education, bank accounts, the vote, etc.) so they're forced to marry off, which they're currently trying to do by taking away workers' rights broadly and any kind of oversight regarding the wage gap and employer discrimination. They'll also punish childless marriages, which they're currently trying to do with sexless marriage.  
  So yes, Republicans are pure fucking evil. >
  
  What about sexless marriage? What? >
  
  Yeah, it's bad. It's targeting asexual marriages and possibly same-sex marriage (since sex, to them, is defined as vaginal intercourse), but it could easily be geared toward wives that won't have sex on demand. Expect marital rape to be effectively de-criminalized to make this work because those two laws would conflict with each other.  
  This, combined with a contraception and abortion ban, forces married women to get pregnant or they could be prosecuted by the state. >
  
  Or people with spinal injury or severe ED or vagimimus (sp). Jesus fucking Christ. >
  
  You can expect that such a big fuss will be brought up over medical exemptions that Republicans will feign mercy and grant them, but only if people stop complaining about marital rape not being a crime anymore.  
  American politics, aren't they grand? >
  
  Plan B works by preventing ovulation. No egg means no baby. Unless life begins at the spooge - in which case I've committed a lifetime of genocides. >
  
  Yea technically genocide since they're all the same ethnicity.   Filicide has a nice ring to it >
  
  Same way a condom is abortion. >
  
  Don't give them any ideas. >
  
  That's why they are coming after porn to stop all the murder by masterbation. >
  
  Jokes on them, I have a great imagination. >
  
  Suddenly Sears is back in business >
  
  That bra section getting my attention again. >
  
  I remember as a teenager looking at the bra and underwear section and one of the underwear models you could see tits. No bra on and the photo wasn't cropped enough. >
  
  I actually remember that too. Do you remember the Ivory soap commercial where you could kind of see tits too? >
  
  Plan B prevents you from getting knocked up. It can’t be abortion if you aren’t pregnant. >
  
  Next thing you know they’re going to be banning condoms. Don’t want STDs or pregnancy? Don’t be “sinning”! >
  
  …they’re already talking about doing that >
  
  The people rounding zygotes up to fully-formed humans have no issue with rounding birth control up to abortion. >
  
  I want them to round it so that male masturbation is an abortion so at least these evangelical men can make their own lives hell >
  
  In some conservative religions it is seen as a sin. Mormonism, for example, considers masturbation as one of the greatest sins you can commit. Right up there with wearing sleeveless shirts or drinking coffee, just below murder or leaving the Mormon religion.
  No /s. >
  
  Mormon's are weird. >
  
  Ime they are no weirder than any other religious people.
  They got their quirks and can be good or bad, but if you dont antagonise them thry are chill >
  
  They actually want to ban the ingredient in plan B - 
  It’s also the main ingredient in The Pill. 
  They want to ban birth control. >
  
  They believe sex should be shameful and risky for women, and will do anything they can think of to make it more so. >
  
  What about the men involved in all this? Or have they thought that far yet? How are things going to end up when we have lots of angry men who have to pay child support? >
  
  Men won’t be required to pay child support anymore if they don’t want to, but women will have to marry their rapists, especially if the “woman” in question is a prepubescent child. I honestly cannot imagine that the ranks of incels and plain old misogynists the right wing courts would ever have any consequence for men, unless they were harming a rich person. >
  
  This is correct. 
  Parental child support started in 1950.  They have made it clear which decade they want to go back to. 
  The Catholics have the Supreme Court. 
  Catholics don’t believe in divorce either.