comment: >
  
  Yeah, speaking as someone with family who are former rebels and victims of the old regime, there isn't a major issue with the communists aside from the average issues with small nation politicians.
  Fighters are still getting their stipends, some still haven't, some have, load shedding has become a thing of the past, and Nepal has become a medical haven in the region. After western tourism, foreigners seeking good and cheap healthcare (espc abortions, dental and intensive surgery) is one of the highest contributors to the GDP
context: This is poorly written >
  
  He was previously PM as well, y'all stop worrying. >
  
  yeah I don't really get why the article is titled that way. Communist parties have been in charge lf Nepal for years at this point >
  
  Yeah, and they managed to bring up energy production to the point where there is no more load shedding. They're not exactly paragons of proletarian virtue, and there are obvious corruption issues, but have been vastly more effective as leaders than the monarchy or congress. They're really just instituting basic social democrat policies, bickering amongst one another, and playing India and china off each other like the average central Asian politician.
  Source: I have Nepalese family, and have visited and lived there, an familiar with it's politics, and speak the language fluently >
  
  Oh no, now he’ll prioritize workers needs over a handful of rich pigs! >
  
  Spoken like someone who doesn't know anything about Nepali politics. He's been prime minister two times before. Ask the families of the former rebels and the victims of the civil war how he has uplifted them.