comment: >
  
  
  The problem with the justices’ use of emails persisted in part because some justices were slow to adopt to the technology and some court employees were nervous about confronting them to urge them to take precautions, one person said. Such behavior meant that justices weren’t setting an example to take security seriously.
  
  That sounds like a bunch of elitist old farts who act like they're gods or something. Of course everything is screwed up in the SCOTUS with that attitude. It's time to put term limits in place for justices through a Constitutional Amendment.
context: good to know that even at the highest levels of our government, nobody pays attention to the IT and information security rules. >
  
  I swear, man, the whole world is just duct tape and zip ties. >
  
  which are fraying if we're being honest. >
  
  If we drill some more holes in the planet, we can fit some more zipties! >
  
  People assume being in high places makes people more intelligent and responsible than they are. Nope, these people who control our lives are just as dumb as the rest of us. Good reason why they should impose term limits on all government officials. >
  
  Eh, if it were Hollywood and a script leaked, they would've known. Ultimately though, what was at stake? It was the same outcome; people just knew sooner. >
  
  Only way to ensure that information security procedures are followed is accountability. SCOTUS justices are entirely unaccountable to anyone, therefore SCOTUS will never be compliant with information security procedures. >
  
  Be nice if CNN could just come out and say “Supreme Court Damaged Beyond Repair”. >
  
  Supreme Court Operations Terribly Uselessly Stupid >
  
  We need a good T word between Operations and Uselessly. I'm too dumb to think of one right now. 
  Tragically? Truly? Terribly? Triumphantly? 🤔 >
  
  Thanks, I added "terribly" >
  
  Rules are for the plebes. Stop pestering me. I have women to oppress. -Amy Coney Barret probably