comment: >
context: Iran is fuming because it was caught doing naughty thing. >
  
  It seems like Iran's attempt to keep their uranium enrichment under wraps was unsuccessful. The IAEA is always one step ahead! >
  
  If you read the article, Iran's enrichment is under constant surveillance and there was no concern about missing uranium or illegal enrichment. The issue had to do with a centrifuge being hooked up in a way that was different than what Iran had reported. Iran claims that the inspector was mistaken and the IAEA would check again.
  There's really not much controversy here, besides Iran saying it's irresponsible to leak things to the press.
  This is one of those nonsense headlines that just serves as clickbait rather than have any substantive development. >
  
  This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 74%. (I'm a bot)
  
  
  Iran slammed UN nuclear watchdog chief after the agency raised concerns over covert changes to equipment at its Fordo uranium enrichment plant.
  International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi on Wednesday accused Iran of making covert changes to one of its uranium enrichment clusters and said Iran did not declare it.
  The IAEA said in a report that Iran had substantially modified an interconnection between two centrifuge clusters enriching uranium to up to 60 percent at Fordo Fuel Enrichment Plant, without giving prior notice.
  
  
  Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iran^#1 agency^#2 report^#3 uranium^#4 state^#5 >
  
  Can we stop with the ‘slammed’ already? >
  
  Iran suplexes the IAEA after.. >
  
  Okay Iran. >
  
  My first thought was "what does IKEA have to do with uranium?" My second thought was that I should probably consider start using glasses again. >
  
  Iran fumes absolutely must be carcinogenic.