comment: >
  
  Oh no, now he’ll prioritize workers needs over a handful of rich pigs!
context: This is poorly written >
  
  He was previously PM as well, y'all stop worrying. >
  
  yeah I don't really get why the article is titled that way. Communist parties have been in charge lf Nepal for years at this point >
  
  Yeah, and they managed to bring up energy production to the point where there is no more load shedding. They're not exactly paragons of proletarian virtue, and there are obvious corruption issues, but have been vastly more effective as leaders than the monarchy or congress. They're really just instituting basic social democrat policies, bickering amongst one another, and playing India and china off each other like the average central Asian politician.
  Source: I have Nepalese family, and have visited and lived there, an familiar with it's politics, and speak the language fluently