comment: >
context: Laos was willing to help Russia, too! They sent 8(?) T-34 tanks to Russia.
  The T-34's were built in the early 1940's, and are easy targets for the current crop of anti-tank weapons. >
  
  Laos-North Korea-Iran-Belarus-Russia
  with a coalition like that who can lose! >
  
  Their combines GDP is almost as high as the state of Virginia careful now that's some serious economic weight behind the latest millitary tech 1981 had to offer. >
  
  That current of a technology! Daaammmnnn... >
  
  Let's see....Belarus offering more help to Russia with what?
  But in the article, Lukashenko stressed that Russia does not need “any help” right now.
  Huh? >
  
  He's doing a pretty good job of waffling and not committing even though he appears to want to do so >
  
  That's a weird way to say he swallows. >
  
  That's a "ho, don't do it" moment if I ever saw one. >
  
  Don't worry Alex, you're too fat to fit through a window. >
  
  Tea it is, then. >
  
  Lukashenko won't invade Ukraine because he knows it'll be regime suicide for him. Either he's trying to scare Ukraine into keeping some of their troops tied up near the Belarus border or he'll give the Russians a few more outdated tanks. >
  
  I'm not so sure. Russia losing could be the end for Alexander Lukashenko too. In fact, after repelling Russians, Ukraine could use its Belarusian divisions to overthrow Lukashenko as free Ukraine simply can't afford so huge border with Russia and Russian puppet state Belarus. 
  I don't know how the conflict in Ukraine will end, but Belarus will most definitely face huge changes soon after. This way or the other. >
  
  Russia losing would surely be terrible news for Lukashenko, but between the army suffering great losses in Ukraine and no longer being able to or willing to protect Lukashenko and his hold on power, and the country facing an economic disaster due to its over-reliance on Russia I think the latter might be a better choice for him because it would give him more time to think and formulate a plan on exactly what to do next.
  Lukashenko is probably living on borrowed time, his best bet is to try and prolong it as much as possible. >
  
  His people will not put up with any real support, he's on thin ice as it is. >
  
  This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 77%. (I'm a bot)
  
  
  HARARE, Zimbabwe - Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko said Tuesday that his country is willing to offer more assistance to close ally Russia in its war against Ukraine.
  ADVERTISEMENT. Russia and Belarus have engaged in joint military exercises on Belarusian territory this month and Ukraine says it has maintained forces along its border with Belarus to fend off any potential invasion.
  Analysts have said that if Belarus' small and inexperienced military gets involved, the additional troops could help Moscow cut off some key transportation corridors but it's unlikely to significantly help Russia's position.
  
  
  Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Belarus^#1 Zimbabwe^#2 Russia^#3 Lukashenko^#4 visit^#5 >
  
  What does Belarus have to offer besides oil and some goats? >
  
  Willing, or told to be?