comment: >
  
  Oh hey I remember when she said that when my town burned down
context: Just in case it's too subtle...invoking the Rothschild family is the go-to codeword for the antisemetic trope of a cabal of powerful Jewish families secretly controlling the world.
  Accusing the Rothschilds of being involved has been a dog whistle for I BET THE JEWS ARE BEHIND THIS for literal decades. >
  
  These days, invoking “Soros” is the same thing. >
  
  How would one accuse the Rothchild family/Soros without being antisemitic? >
  
  Discuss the problem behavior.  Don't just use the name absent any context. >
  
  What exactly is Soros’ problem behavior? >
  
  I understood that someone was asking "If mentioning someone (Soros, etc) is anti semitic how are we supposed to even discuss their wrongdoings?".  To properly discuss them without being anti semitic one should be specific about what they're doing and why they perceive it as being wrong.
  I don't keep up enough to know which behaviors are wrong or even problematic of those specific people. >
  
  She probably means she doesn't know the exact details of their deployment.  By the Jews. >
  
  Well of course not. They're written in Hebrew, past down for thousands of years since the space aliens helped to build them. >
  
  I laughed... But then I realized that the people who support Greene are exactly the kind of people who would eat up that ancient aliens bullshit. >
  
  What an utterly hypocritical coward. She does not even have the guts to stand up for her own comments. >
  
  cognitive-dissonance is a conflict in the mind that one suffers when several held beliefs conflict. this crop of right-wingnut folk dont suffer; they hold conflicting and wildly wrong beliefs with no ill effect whatsoever, willingly and gleefully. 
  edit to add: crank magnetism >
  
  So, can all of these contradictory statements from her be used to prove she's mentally unfit for office,  because that seems to be the case. >
  
  not to OP: 
  proof is for court. the only 'crime' she commits publicly is being an unfriendly being, with horrible words, and horrible ideas... all aimed towards horrible goals. 
  go ahead; ask what her goals are. I dare anyone. >
  
  I don't think you have to commit a crime to be mentally unfit, though. >
  
  Federal separation of powers makes it a Legislative and political act to declare someone unfit (the House or Senate respectively have to vote for it).
  That means that whoever controls the votes in the chamber controls the ability to censure or remove members.
  For a very long time Rs (and some Ds) have eroded ethical oversight and consequences from any such discoveries to the point where ethics are not enforced by the chambers, only the voters.
  That’s the only remaining ethical check on behavior in our legislative branch. (Actual illegality that covers them, on the other hand, is investigated by the executive and judged by the Judicial). But there’s only one law making you ineligible to serve, that’s insurrection.