comment: >
  
  To who? Twitter's not worth 40 billion now, (not that it ever was). The brand is wrecked,  a lot of the talent has left, it's facing mounting legal liabilities. He'd have to take a massive loss, and look like an idiot.
context: Mr Shevat told the BBC that workers were initially promised four months' pay as severance by Twitter, but were offered only one month in the end - with "zero justification" for the reduction in package. 
  
  Among the many reasons they are suing is the lack of payment. Musk made an offer in writing then rescinded it on a whim. >
  
  The transformation into Tech Donald Trump is complete. He got the gift of grift down now. >
  
  
  The transformation into Tech Donald Trump is complete
  
  You don't just transform into him.  You were always him just now he is being exposed to what a douche bag he was. >
  
  Seriously, the guy works his Tesla engineers to the bone, and then calls the ones that left after working the agreed number of years for stock compensation second rate.  Of course he’s a shit person. >
  
  For context. Canadian legal standard for layoffs are 2 weeks pay per year of service. Goes up to 3 to 4 based on mitigating factors >
  
  Small clarification.
  Minimum 2 weeks severance for anyone working for atleast 1 year.
  Increases to 3, 4, 5 weeks worth based on length of work (3 years, 5 years, etc)
  That is to say it is not necessarily 2 weeks per year of work.
  Simply firing on a whim is not a thing. Not paying severance is also not a thing. 
  I wonder if they got their vacation pay paid out. >
  
  Another small clarification.
  Severance is paid upon retirement.
  Pay in lieu of notice is paid when you are fired without notice period. They have different tax implications >
  
  ^ this person is correct! >
  
  Excellent. I was hoping for some good news today. This works. >
  
  We're just gonna pretend that we're shocked at surprised at how shareholders/the board tolerate Muskrat like this. >
  
  It must be nerve-wracking having investments in companies that are one tweet from a maladjusted billionaire, who spends half the day tweeting, away from drops. >
  
  At first I thought you were talking about Trump but then you said billionaire. >
  
  I like how the article decided it needed to define the “bricked” slang word >
  
  But Elon's totally making Twitter better, guys! /S >
  
  Boy you really owned the Libs with this brilliant move, Elon. But now the worst of humanity loves you so it was totally worth losing all that personal net worth. >
  
  Elon's business acumen has really shown through since he bought Twitter. >
  
  Steve Jobs had a reality distortion field, but Jobs field actually worked to create things.
  Elon Musk has a reality distortion field, but it's a shoddy knockoff that's failing. >
  
  The comparison is spot on and it made me think...Im trying to remember really if Jobs ever had much to say about anything outside of technology. I dont ever remember him saying anything about pop culture or politics except for shit about the beatles.
  Guy was arrogant but he was quiet and arrogant, at least in the public/PR space. >
  
  He did say he could cure his curable cancer with a juice cleanse.
  He was wrong. >
  
  He had a stupid idea but no, he did not go around polluting the public consciousness with those stupid ideas. >
  
  Poor Tweelon,  he might need help with from his Saudi buddies. >
  
  Don’t go to the embassy Elon. They gonna cut you up. >
  
  Oh no >
  
  Kinda happens when you break the law. At least thats what I heard. I hope Muskrat looses every. single.one. with hefty penalties. 
  Is there anything like systemic contempt? Would be epic if there were extra penalties for each case adding up to huge sums. >
  
  How long before he outright sells?