comment: >
  
  "OKay, let's play exhibit A, please..."
  "Now, hold on just a moment..."
context: Just in case it's too subtle...invoking the Rothschild family is the go-to codeword for the antisemetic trope of a cabal of powerful Jewish families secretly controlling the world.
  Accusing the Rothschilds of being involved has been a dog whistle for I BET THE JEWS ARE BEHIND THIS for literal decades. >
  
  These days, invoking “Soros” is the same thing. >
  
  How would one accuse the Rothchild family/Soros without being antisemitic? >
  
  Discuss the problem behavior.  Don't just use the name absent any context. >
  
  What exactly is Soros’ problem behavior? >
  
  I understood that someone was asking "If mentioning someone (Soros, etc) is anti semitic how are we supposed to even discuss their wrongdoings?".  To properly discuss them without being anti semitic one should be specific about what they're doing and why they perceive it as being wrong.
  I don't keep up enough to know which behaviors are wrong or even problematic of those specific people. >
  
  She probably means she doesn't know the exact details of their deployment.  By the Jews. >
  
  Well of course not. They're written in Hebrew, past down for thousands of years since the space aliens helped to build them. >
  
  I laughed... But then I realized that the people who support Greene are exactly the kind of people who would eat up that ancient aliens bullshit. >
  
  What an utterly hypocritical coward. She does not even have the guts to stand up for her own comments. >
  
  cognitive-dissonance is a conflict in the mind that one suffers when several held beliefs conflict. this crop of right-wingnut folk dont suffer; they hold conflicting and wildly wrong beliefs with no ill effect whatsoever, willingly and gleefully. 
  edit to add: crank magnetism >
  
  So, can all of these contradictory statements from her be used to prove she's mentally unfit for office,  because that seems to be the case. >
  
  not to OP: 
  proof is for court. the only 'crime' she commits publicly is being an unfriendly being, with horrible words, and horrible ideas... all aimed towards horrible goals. 
  go ahead; ask what her goals are. I dare anyone. >
  
  I don't think you have to commit a crime to be mentally unfit, though. >
  
  Federal separation of powers makes it a Legislative and political act to declare someone unfit (the House or Senate respectively have to vote for it).
  That means that whoever controls the votes in the chamber controls the ability to censure or remove members.
  For a very long time Rs (and some Ds) have eroded ethical oversight and consequences from any such discoveries to the point where ethics are not enforced by the chambers, only the voters.
  That’s the only remaining ethical check on behavior in our legislative branch. (Actual illegality that covers them, on the other hand, is investigated by the executive and judged by the Judicial). But there’s only one law making you ineligible to serve, that’s insurrection. >
  
  Oh hey I remember when she said that when my town burned down >
  
  Ugh. I am sorry. She is an ill-mannered, beastly woman. Politicians should not delight in the suffering of others, yet here we are. If I had to go through what happened to your family and so many other families and then hear things like that, I would have a very hard time not giving in to to my worst impulses. >
  
  Really I roll my eyes at her, she's pretty absurd >
  
  Literal gaslighting. Proof is on video but she claims otherwise. >
  
  Crazy to think that she said that stuff and other outlandish shit and was handily re-elected.  I travel through the Atlanta area a few time a a year.  I’ll never stop to buy anything in her district. >
  
  While I agree with your sentiment, as someone who's lived in Atlanta, I feel the need to point out her district is outside of what's generally considered metro Atlanta.
  She's not one of ours. That's where banjo country begins. >
  
  Not that there's anything wrong with banjo. >
  
  Or Kazooie >
  
  Eh, there's some rumors about Kazooie. >
  
  Yeah, I heard about that. Crazy shit. >
  
  That poor ostrich..... >
  
  Allegedly. >
  
  
  So why does the trending phrase have the word “Jewish” in front of it? Well, Taylor Greene’s post suggested that the Rothschild banking firm is behind a supposed corporate cabal that engineered this whole space laser plot. Ah, of course, the old Rothschild family explanation again. As Zack Beauchamp wrote for Vox, anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family controlling the world have frequently surfaced in the past. Beauchamp explained that this was not “an isolated anti-Semitic incident for Greene.” In fact, the Editorial Board for USA TODAY wrote that “her Facebook account contained racist, Islamophobic and anti-Semitic views,” which doesn’t sound very nice. Beauchamp stated that Taylor Greene’s “space laser” theory is “the latest in a long line of conspiracies about the Rothschild family, and those conspiracies are always, at root, anti-Semitic: Since the 19th century, people have used claims that this one particular wealthy family controls the world to cast aspersions on Jews in general.”
  
  Source: Forbes, Jan. 30, 2021 >
  
  Oh, look. Receipts! >
  
  Wild, the past. Remember when republicans tried to say that kids who got shot at school were crisis actors? >
  
  Marjorie Taylor Greene was one of them. >
  
  She’s a liar. >
  
  Her constituents and supporters do not care that SHE is a liar. Magic "R" hard at work. >
  
  I mean... She's right. She never used that phrase. She said Rothschild's funded Space Laser. Huge difference!!!  /s >
  
  That's literally what they're going with lol.