comment: >
  
  That's how the con works. They create doubt in people's minds and then cite that doubt as evidence to support their claims.  When a lot of people come to believe it, others see that agreement as proof that there must be truth to it.
  When someone else points out that there's no evidence, they are outraged, because how could so many people believe it if there wasn't evidence?
context: “There's a lack of confidence from some of my constituents in the election itself," Republican state Rep. Rachel Jones of Tucson, who presented the bill, said during the committee meeting.
  
  No shit.  Your party and conservative media have spent two years blatantly lying about election outcomes, it is no wonder that your constituents feel that way.