comment: >
  
  
  It's a problem, just not as much of a problem in the West.
  
  I'd edit that to the US, not the west. Europe has issues still, though they are less than years past as we have mostly destroyed the large organizations.
context: It still is. For example, the Wikipedia main page for today says:
  
  A suicide bombing in a mosque in Peshawar, Pakistan, kills 100 people and injures more than 220 others. >
  
  This seems to be antiislamic terror ? >
  
  I would classify it as intra-islamic terrorism. >
  
  I’m really not looking forward to having to deal with “Post-Modern Islamic Terrorism.” >
  
  It's a problem, just not as much of a problem in the West.
  The biggest potential threat for Islamist (not Islamic, there's a difference) terrorism in the west post-9/11 was almost always "lone wolf" attacks against soft targets.
  Well, the decisive action against ISIS/ISIL, Al Qaeda, and similar organizations both crippled their ability to fund such operations, diminished their reach via social media, and severely crippled their leadership structures. After all, nobody wants to take an afternoon drive and get hit with a slap chop missile that doesn't leave enough left to fill a doggy bag.