comment: >
  
  Clearly she's forgotten the people who put her in the position she's in. Unless something changes she's toast during the 2024 primary. Not surprising she's acted this way given she's abandoned the party. Take a look at the first word of every sentence of my post if you want to know what I really think about her.
context: The accusations “paint a picture of a Senator who is not only unresponsive to her constituents, but also disrespectful and even abusive to her employees and wholly unconcerned about her obligations under the law,”  
  “Most troubling,” the letter alleges, Sinema, who recently switched from the Democratic Party to govern as an Independent, “calls on staff members, who are employed and paid by the public and explicitly barred from campaign activity, to schedule and facilitate political fundraisers and meetings with campaign donors, presumably during the workday while they are on the clock and physically on federal property. >
  
  Quoting what your policy is doesn't constitute a denial. 
  
  Following The Daily Beast article in December, Sinema spokeswoman Hannah Hurley insisted that the senator “does not require staff to perform personal errands,” and that “the alleged information—sourced from anonymous quotes and a purported document I can’t verify—is not in line with official guidance from Sen. Sinema’s office and does not represent official policies of Sen. Sinema’s office.” >
  
  After Ms Hurley made this statement, she resumed her job painting Ms Sinema's backyard fence. >
  
  Ms Hurley complained that Ms Sinema tricked her by pretending to take great delight painting said fence when in fact it was a deceit intended to lure Ms Hurley into a life of subservience. >
  
  in fact, Ms Hurley paid Ms Sinema for the privilege of painting the fence! >
  
  Ms Hurley paid out of her personal funds the full cost of the paint (color being Cruella Icequeen Frost) she personally selected at Lowes during work hours as an assigned task 💅🏻 >
  
  Ethics complaints are useless. Four years of the Trump administration proved it. >
  
  That’s the sad truth, and it gets gutted more and more. >
  
  One things for fuckin sure - AZ needs better. 
  Fuck off Sinema. Gallego will trounce you. And he's more awesome anyway. >
  
  
  Gallego will trounce you.
  
  Nothing is certain until it is.  He can win, but there's no guarantee he will and he ONLY will if everyone that does not want Sinema and lives in AZ, actively organizes and campaigns for Gallego starting now.
  There was a similar scenario in the OR Governor's race this past election and it was nail biter, not because the "left-leaning Independent" was likely to win, but because she absolutely acted as a spoiler candidate for the Democrat in the race (who eventually did win but it was far too close). >
  
  I don't know if you live here, but I'm already being bombarded with multiple texts and emails campaigning for him. I have very little doubt he'll win over Sinema. He polls very well here, and she polls very unfavorably, so it's not really as long a shot as you'd think. >
  
  Again, it's not about him winning over Sinema, that's not the issue, it's if Sinema will spoil the race and get the Republican candidate elected because she'll siphon off votes that otherwise would have gone to the generic Democrat on the ballot.  Democrats who are paying attention aren't going to vote for Sinema, but there are a LOT of low information and moderate voters who would reliably vote for any Democrat in a D v R race, but might go for Sinema in a 3rd person race (for whatever reason, name recognition, prefer a moderate, etc.), and it will only take 1 percentage point or two to throw a race. >
  
  Right, the concern isn't her winning. It's could she siphon enough votes from Gallegos to put someone like Qari Lake in the senate. >
  
  The republicans like her more than the democrats. Fox news has been talking favorably of Sinema. So I'm not so sure she'd be syphoning votes from democrats. >
  
  They like her because she's undermining Democrats, and they'd love if Manchin flipped now and gave them control of the senate. But most Republicans aren't going to vote for her over a real Republican.
  My concern isn't that she'd take Democrat votes. My concern is that AZ is probably still a lot like GA, where a Democrat needs a lot of moderate votes to win. It's her winning votes from independents and moderate Republicans that might vote for Gallegos over a Trumpy Republican that could cost Democrats. >
  
  Actually yeah, I could see that. 
  Only time will tell. >
  
  She says it's not true, so expect emails, video, texts and voice-mail to be leaked next week. >
  
  Embodiment of a self-serving narcissist employing performative politics to play all sides for her own benefit. Not too surprising that she treats her staff the same as her constituents >
  
  
  Embodiment of a self-serving narcissist
  
  ☝️
  From day one she was full of bullshit and putting on a performance. >
  
  I read an article the other day that Republicans controlling the house is a result of voter suppression laws.  Sinema and Manchin  shutdown getting rid of the fillibuster which would have allowed the voter protection act to pass.  The crap going on in Congress now is 50% on her. >
  
  Technically it’s 1.9% on her. She was one of 52 senators opposed getting rid of the filibuster. >
  
  50 of those don't have the mental capacity, or spine to make decisions on their own unfortunately. >
  
  Sinema is legitimately a horrible person who should be ashamed for blatantly bullshitting the people that elected her entirely to line her own fucking pockets. She should be insulted and heckled every time she steps foot in public, until she disappears from public life forever or sees punishment for her actions >
  
  Sinema, the original Santos. >
  
  Except she fucked up and forgot that the party and constituents she was pretending to represent were not those that embrace liars and revel in their evilness. Which is why she’s now “independent”. >
  
  Another article on $inema. This trash bag has got to go. >
  
  Is anyone surprised that the self appointed princess behaves this way? >
  
  She's an abusive, self-centered asshole? Who would have ever guessed?!? >
  
  Do we (American here) still do ethics?  Thought that was pretty much over >
  
  I wouldn't expect a woman with zero ethics to have any ethics. >
  
  Makes me even more mad that she was a social worker and sucks this hard. >
  
  That scares me quite frankly. >
  
  Is it just me or does she look a bit like Santos in that photo? >
  
  have we ever seen them together in the same room before? 🤨🤨🤨 >
  
  This lady is the worst…what an awful human. >
  
  Joe Manchin must wake up every morning thanking god that Sinema was elected.  Sinema makes an old white guy elected by the coal industry look senatorial. >
  
  The fucking curtsy.  Disgusting.