comment: >
  
  McCarthy apparently doesn’t understand there is more truth value on the Bigfoot channels.
context: Wouldn’t this be, oh…
  The government interfering with free enterprise? Like….
  COMMUNISM? >
  
  Not when GQP does it. Then it's patriotism. >
  
  If you enter Patriot at the end, you can save 30% on your next pillow purchase. >
  
  “People aren’t  just going to be allowed to choose who to do business with under our government” -Kevin McCarthy >
  
  Sounds like wedding cakes for everyone are back on the menu folks! >
  
  Oh no, it looks like McCarthy intends to put the government in the role of regulating who must say what. I seem to recall some rule or other about that.
  
  . . . I think Americans should be able to have a choice in the news they are able to get.
  
  And McCarthy intends to decide just what news that is. >
  
  “You can have any type of news you want, as long as you choose propaganda” >
  
  Newsmax raised its price beyond what directtv was willing to pay. Maybe newsmax should lower it's price to what the market will bear? >
  
  If I was a provider, Even if they paid me it wouldn't be worth it to carry them >
  
  Anyone calling up to complain about Newsmax being gone was probably already in the system for being an asshole customer. >
  
  So let me get this right.  Republicans believe a private enterprise should be able to refuse service (cake shop), but not refuse service (Newsmax) and demands no restrictions on  media  (Trump Twitter) and demands restrictions on media (Louisiana porn id requirement), demands everyone respect their religious tenents (abortion) and demands some religious tenents be forbidden (satanic church abortion ritual).
  (edited for spelling) >
  
  Sounds like the Chinese Government. The GOP would do well to remember that pissing off the business class will not end well for them >
  
  Let them eat face