comment: >
  
  they don't make enough money to pay rent, buy a house, or save for retirement. so how is that "enough money"?
  and i hate this argument that "someone earns less than you, so you should earn less, too". that's a really fucked up perspective. everyone should earn more money.
context: I always assumed tips were split with everyone. Servers have like the easiest job at the restaurant. I want my tip to go to the bus boy and chef >
  
  Basically, everyone should be paid around 3-4 times what they make. >
  
  You would gain nothing. If businesses had to pay that much more in wages they would have to jack up their prices accordingly and you wouldn't be able to afford it anyway. Plus the fact that you would jump into a higher tax bracket. >
  
  Obviously, we live in a system controlled by business owners.
  Socialism is the way >
  
  If you are anti tip, you are anti worker. It is one the few times in capitalism you are able to directly compensate someone for their labor without having a middleman/owner take a share. If anything, socialists should support tip sharing across the entire restaurant, so that workers can have more ownership in the restaurant. >
  
  That is far too small an impact for most socialists to bother, it is a bandaid solution that is inferior to, for example, mutual aid funds