comment: >
  
  A separate article on this was posted yesterday on the IndianCountry subreddit.  The above link goes to the native people's comments there.
context: Not if republicans have anything to say about it >
  
  So you think these 188 years are purely the fault of republicans ? >
  
  They weren’t called that all that time, but yes. >
  
  So why didn’t the democrats allow this when they controlled the house during the previous congress? >
  
  Narrator: Under no circumstances will Republicans allow this. >
  
  My understanding is this is a non-voting seat. Republicans can take the W on this with no cost to their majority. >
  
  Even at no cost I doubt they’ll support giving a minority a voice. They’ll find some bullshit reason to justify it. >
  
  "It's not what the founding fathers would have wanted." >
  
  Honestly, the only time they may be right when they say that…