comment: >
  
  Source on the “force majeure” claim preventing the US from seizing it? I don’t see how that can possibly be the case.
context: Force majeure: An event or effect that cannot be reasonably anticipated or controlled, e.g. ACT OF GOD >
  
  What are you saying exactly? >
  
  It’s a legal stance that they couldn’t control it so they aren’t at fault. Basically they weren’t spying on the us, this shit just went over the us by a failure. It also prevents us from seizing it and whatever was attached to it. Idk how well this argument will srand