comment: >
  
  I don't know what the thing he's doing is supposed to be called, I just know it's not what the headline implies. The only thing oniony about this article is how badly the author fucked up the title.
  If it weren't for the clickbait of "What lol the AG wants Dollar General stores to avoid him" then this would never get views.
context: I really like this headline. The article makes sense though on why. Keep spamming him. >
  
  To some other sub. Because this is not Oniony in any way. >
  
  Idk the headline made me think he was going to block one opening in his area to stop the poors from entering his nice side of town. I think thats a bit oniony, but the article itself is pretty standard. >
  
  I shall. Let the reddit gods decide lol. Theres just so many that are barely if at all oniony at the moment. >
  
  Im more with ya than against ya >
  
  Better headline here: "Ohio AG attempts to protect consumers in Ohio." While I dislike republicans more than the next guy, I'm unbiased enough to realize what he's attempting to do here isn't bad. >
  
  But let's face it, did you actually believe a Republican wouldn't side with Dollar General and charge their customers with a crime instead? >
  
  Honestly, all states should grill DG. Such a shitty corporation. >
  
  
  Yost asked a Butler County Common Pleas judge to immediately halt the Tennessee-based retailer from advertising one price on shelves and then charging a different, typically higher price at registers.
  Yost cited ongoing violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act and requested a hearing for a preliminary injunction that would require Dollar General to abide by Ohio consumer laws as the case progresses.
  
  Until there are fines for non-compliance, I suspect the practice will continue.. >
  
  Meanwhile in Alabama our AG is ignoring blatantchild labor violations in plants that have already been fined for their amputation hazards and declaring that women who take plan b can be jailed for child abuse.
  Good to see there are some AG's that are actually doing things to help the people of their state. Can we borrow him? >
  
  "Restraining order" is one of the most deceptive ways this headline could have been phrased. Yes, technically he is requesting an order that will pose a restraint to the company. But Restraining Orders are also a thing. Being that misleading is journalistic malpractice. >
  
  Thank you, I was starting to think I was even more ignorant of legal terms than I thought.
  It sounds like he's seeking an injunction?