comment: >
  
  Ummm, he was intentionally keeping the documents. He was told that the documents were not his to own repeatedly and he kept them anyway. He didn't fully comply with a legal subpoena to return them.
context: I thought it was hilarious when Trump complained that his special counsel's sister is anti-Trump. I hope some aspiring journalist investigates what Biden's special counsel's sister thinks of Biden. >
  
  Trump's complaints about supposed Bias always make no sense when you think about them for even two seconds. Trump complains tgat anyone who is not a Republican is biased against him. But he also complains when a non-conservatives investigates a Democrat, because that is just a cover-up. >
  
  It doesn’t need to make sense. The purpose is to create a smokescreen about bias and 15s sound bites for the media. Half the population will hear a completely different story and won’t bother to reason it though. Firehose of falsehoods and whataboutism are fascist propaganda 101, invented by his Russian handlers a century ago. >
  
  Bingo. >
  
  
  Gibson Dunn partner Robert Hur, formerly the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, will now look into Biden’s documents. He’ll probably conclude that Biden improperly handled the documents and recommend an administrative penalty of some kind, which is how these cases usually go when the target didn’t mislead investigators.
  
  Yep.  At worst, Biden will get a slap on the wrist if found guilty.  Trump, on the other hand, faces years in prison if found guilty, assuming he doesn't get a pass for being rich.  Also, this can no longer be seen as a partisan witch hunt since both of them were investigated by a special counsel. >
  
  He won’t even be found guilty because for it to be a crime he would have had to intentionally keep the documents.