comment: >
  
  I can't access the text as I am not from the US.
  But those are different laws, presumably with different importance. The Bible specifies some pretty extreme punishments doesn't it? so those laws do not seem to be ones that are taken lightly.
  And what do you think of gay people who lived before Jesus?
context: /u/LiaTheGamer (OP) has awarded 1 delta(s) in this post.
  All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
  Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
  ^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >
  
  A good number of Christian denominations say that Jesus fulfilled the laws described in the old testament and now those laws no longer have to be followed. Under this interpretation of Jesus, which is argued by most mainstream Christian faith groups, Leviticus and other old-testament lists of laws are no longer relevant.
  Based on this view, you can accept homosexual people and still be in-line with the teachings of the bible and therefore be a good Christian >
  
  That seems like a cop out. Did Jesus ever say he was doing any of that? did Christians stop observing those laws after Jesus? or was this something made up 2 millenia after the fact to make Christians look less mean?
  And even if it were well-justified by the text, that would still mean any gay people before Jesus were wrong, and deserved to be oppressed, arrested, and stoned like they were. Do you believe that was right?