comment: >
  
  That’s how you get people to cover up their mistakes instead of admitting to them.
context: I thought it was hilarious when Trump complained that his special counsel's sister is anti-Trump. I hope some aspiring journalist investigates what Biden's special counsel's sister thinks of Biden. >
  
  Trump's complaints about supposed Bias always make no sense when you think about them for even two seconds. Trump complains tgat anyone who is not a Republican is biased against him. But he also complains when a non-conservatives investigates a Democrat, because that is just a cover-up. >
  
  It doesn’t need to make sense. The purpose is to create a smokescreen about bias and 15s sound bites for the media. Half the population will hear a completely different story and won’t bother to reason it though. Firehose of falsehoods and whataboutism are fascist propaganda 101, invented by his Russian handlers a century ago. >
  
  Bingo. >
  
  
  Gibson Dunn partner Robert Hur, formerly the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, will now look into Biden’s documents. He’ll probably conclude that Biden improperly handled the documents and recommend an administrative penalty of some kind, which is how these cases usually go when the target didn’t mislead investigators.
  
  Yep.  At worst, Biden will get a slap on the wrist if found guilty.  Trump, on the other hand, faces years in prison if found guilty, assuming he doesn't get a pass for being rich.  Also, this can no longer be seen as a partisan witch hunt since both of them were investigated by a special counsel. >
  
  He won’t even be found guilty because for it to be a crime he would have had to intentionally keep the documents. >
  
  Ummm, he was intentionally keeping the documents. He was told that the documents were not his to own repeatedly and he kept them anyway. He didn't fully comply with a legal subpoena to return them. >
  
  I think they’re talking about Biden not Trump >
  
  Ah got it. Was a little confusing since both Biden and Trump were referenced in the comment. >
  
  SCOTUS just said a sitting president can't be charged so Joe's good for 2 more years. >
  
  Biden has nothing to do with this.
  His staffers failed him and need to be prosecuted.
  Whoever removed those docs and boxed it up needs to be identified and prosecuted. >
  
  You’re assuming that those documents were boxed up, intentionally and moved to his residence. That certainly needs to be proven rather than them accidentally being included or left behind. >
  
  You dont need intent -  gross negligence is sufficient in prosecuting.
  Carelessness definitely should be prosecuted.