comment: >
  
  Might be the Talibangelicals
context: And I assume, WWE and other wrestling shows too, right? I mean they are nearly naked men performing in front of children. >
  
  WWE events are violent too. >
  
  No, no you see violence is fine. Sex is what we need to protect the kids* from. And heaven help you if it is one of those “deviant” lifestyles in those LGBTQ “people”.
  *kids being anyone under 21 (except of course unless they were married off to a person 30+ years their senior as a young teenager) >
  
  and here kid take this rifle and go kill those people not letting Compass Minerals mine there... >
  
  The Republican Party is obsessed with drag. Wonder why? >
  
  They didn't have a problem with guiliani when he dressed in drag and trump tried to motorboat him. >
  
  There's been a television show on basic cable specifically about drag performances, that has widely considered to be a family friendly show for basically EVER at this point.  Not a fucking peep for years, but now they're a problem.   
  I guarantee you many of the people screaming about this bullshit have enjoyed the show, too. >
  
  Bob Hope ffs. >
  
  And churches too, right? Since that is where grooming and sexual assaults are occurring, right?   
  Who am I kidding. They should just ban children from Nebraska as a whole for their safety. >
  
  Ban books about being gay, but read the bible about Lot offering his two young daughters to get gangbanged, and then have those same daughters rape him later... >
  
  But places like Hooters is cool, right? 🙄 >
  
  Good clean family fun...🙄 >
  
  Imagine getting elected and then spending you're time on this. There are real issues and problems that need to be solved, instead they focus on this. >
  
  Honestly I feel safer letting my boys go to a drag show than letting them spend time in a catholic church. >
  
  Or especially with a youth pastor >
  
  We should ban kids from church while we’re at it. >
  
  It would actually protect more children if we did. 
  "Church officials shall not be allowed to be alone with those under 18 years of age" thats how you protect kids. >
  
  Aren't Republicans the party that complained about the "nanny state"?  Interfering with a parent's rights to make choices for their kids when there are no immediate health or safety risks involved seems to be the definition of nannying. >
  
  Will minors still be allowed to watch Milton Berle clips? >
  
  Can't see a good play of "Matilda" anymore if they get this through. Miss Trunchbull is traditionally played by a man in the theatrical renditions of the story. >
  
  So removing the rights of the parents to make that decision for their children? Weren't Republicans screaming about parental rights recently? >
  
  same people who publicly post unhinged family photos where their five year old is holding a Rambo gun and smiling ear to ear lol kick rocks bozos >
  
  Can we ban adults from child beauty pageant shows or just ban those altogether?!?! >
  
  The party of free speech! >
  
  Y'all queda is at it again!