comment: >
  
  They are both found on the farm
context: Literally thinks women are there for his consumption. >
  
  I like eating out women myself, but I get your point >
  
  Women voting Republican is something I can't understand. >
  
  Many just vote the way their husband does. They probably consume less political "news" in general and their main source of information is the spouse, so they get a Fox News curated version of events. Especially those that were raised to be subservient to their husband (it's a Bible thing). >
  
  You know, instead of saying insane shit, how about you just educate yourself. There's a book for that. >
  
  Books are like kryptonite to a republican. >
  
  Books have a known liberal bias >
  
  Forget the apology, I wanna know what his "definite opinions" are.
  Like, I know how cows are inseminated..... 
  And I know that they are literal livestock, whose reproductive processes are tightly controlled and exploited for the benefit of others.... >
  
  “Not only were his comments offensive and embarrassing, they were odd, given that he was simply introducing himself to the House Agriculture Committee,” stated the editorial. “This was how he chose to introduce himself, by comparing women’s health care with milking a cow?”
  Hey, Jack we just need you to say your name and a bit about why you’re here. 
  Great! You think they want to hear my thoughts on trans rights?
  Nope, just an intro. 
  War in Ukraine?
  Really just your name, Jack…
  TedTalk on women’s bodies it is! >
  
  I mean. We have the famous quote "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."
  So they literally see women as livestock. >
  
  Why stop at that one? >
  
  Women? Cattle? He sees no difference here.