comment: >
  
  Have you considered the possibility that right leaning accounts were breaking TOS with greater regularity? Because…
context: Wait. They've been telling us the exact opposite.. >
  
  Projection. >
  
  it's in their acronym >
  
  Funny how Elon didn’t release these >
  
  What was released? Can we see the internal communications they are referring to? >
  
  Okay. Thanks. Yes I've actually read that report. I though maybe they had access to some leaked internal Twitter communications. 
  'm a bit confused though. The suggestion of the article is that Twitter bent over backwards to accommodate  and placate Republicans. And yet...the vast majority of the bans and suspensions were right leaning accounts. So that in a way renders that argument weak. If they were unfairly placating the right, why were so many accounts on the right being suppressed or suspended? I thought you were going to link to files that showed Twitter was in fact also equally  banning people on the Left. 
  Of course, whether or not those accounts on the Right deserved to get suppressed is a different question. Actually that's the real question. The Twitter files show clearly that Democratic leadership and US intelligence were very active in making requests to suppress accounts. In and of itself that isn't very scandalous if there were good reasons to suppress accounts eg proven disinformation, links to foreign State actors etc. But what we now know is that many of the requests from the Left to suppress accounts were based on not truthful assertions. Eg Hunter Biden laptop story was false Russian disinformation. Or the "Releasethememo" hashtag was Russia driven etc. That's the issue. The requests from the Left to ban users often (not always) were themselves based on a form of disinformation. 
  If there is evidence of a counter narrative eg that Twitter was for example unfairly suppressing voices on the Left, I'd be interested in seeing that. Seems clear from the internal communications that Twitter staff were in a very difficult position and were walking a tightrope were it's impossible to please everyone. But it seems clear they lent Left in terms of their actions. In many cases that was probably justified. But the scandal is more around the instances when it wasn't justified - when it was based on Left or US intelligence originating disinformation.