comment: >
context: A steady stream of girls and women livestreaming dying from hospital beds because they can't get an abortion will help >
  
  r/welcometogilead >
  
  Passed by men who believe vaginas are for urine and sex.
  Same men whom probably don't know what a fallopian tube is. >
  
  Not saying overturning Roe vs Wade isn’t huge but you would like to believe that after Jan6 and Trump and the Republican Parties continuing to spread the Big Lie would be all that it should take to motivate people to vote against Republicans. After all when you consider what they tried to do was to take away any opportunity people have to say with regards to their basic right to vote. Lose that and not only is Roe vs Wade lost but so are any other freedoms you thought you might have.
  Take whatever we can get to stop them, but really people need to pay more attention to what the Hell is going on. After all basically what Trump tried due to his narcissism and total lack of morals was to become the first dictator of these United States. He didn’t succeed but it also hasn’t yet stopped him and his cohorts from trying. Hell, DeSantis appears to be the Republican Parties next best answer in case Trump fails, and he’s no less if not a worse fascist than Trump. >
  
  If not DeSantis, there are others eager to try. >
  
  Yep, turns out now that they have a better idea what the base wants and what they can get away with there are more than a few willing to give it a go. 2 years can be a long time but the only one who even comes up in the same sentence as a possibility is DeSantis though, at least from what I’ve seen. >
  
  The question now is whether the passions that guided voters during the 2022 midterms can be maintained over the two year period between now and the 2024 election, writes Grace Segers. >
  
  The Supreme Court will be providing plenty of gems for Democratic campaigns (aka horrible things for people) between now and then. They should be widely discussed, and always attach the recent abortion decision to the conversation. >
  
  it will stay that way until it's reversed.
  people in the 21st century don't like losing human rights and access to medical care based on 13th century judicial opinions.
  being loud doesn't make a majority. >
  
  You do realize what Jan6 represents don't you? It doesn't get more basic when it comes to losing your right to vote. In fact when you lose your right to vote most if not all of your rights will follow and it's not like those that attempted Jan6 have stopped trying. Regardless it would appear that if not for the overturning of Roe vs Wade there may very well have been a Red Wave.
  People may not like losing their human rights, but they don't necessarily pay attention to what is going on. After all they did actually elect Trump in 2016 and this is the reason Roe vs Wade was actually overturned. I mean he did after all promise to nominate only Supreme Court Justices who would overturn Roe vs Wade.
  Please tell me again what you think about voters and what they don't care for?
  Here's to more people paying more attention to what is actually going on. They do after all have their struggles of daily life to deal with, however their daily life may change drastically if they don't take their head out of the sand and pay more attention to what is actually going on. >
  
  i'm confused by your word salad;
  
  it would appear that if not for the overturning of Roe vs Wade there may very well have been a Red Wave.
  People may not like losing their human rights, but they don't necessarily pay attention to what is going on
  Please tell me again what you think about voters and what they don't care for?
  
  i didn't say shit about voters. i did say people don't like losing their human rights and access to 21st century medical care. i guess you missed that point... somehow
  
  Here's to more people paying more attention to what is actually going on.
  
  ok? >
  
  Then I"ll try to make it easier for you.
  Trump promised when campaigning for President to nominate Supreme Court Justices who were going to overturn Roe vs Wade and pretty sure Trump also promised to overturn Obama care as well. If people cared so much about their human rights they should have voted to make sure he didn't get into office in the first place.
  If people cared so much about their human rights then Jan6 when Trump tried to take their voting rights away this should have been enough to prevent a Red Wave without the need of Roe vs Wade to motivate them. >
  
  
  If people cared so much about their human rights they should have voted to make sure he didn't get into office in the first place.
  
  he lost the popular vote.
  
  If people cared so much about their human rights then Jan6 
  
  people care about their human rights and access to medical care. apparently, more than they care about the government.
  that was pretty easy, actually. >
  
  Not enough evidently, that is because he won. >
  
  
  If people cared so much
  they should have voted
  
  he lost the popular vote. >
  
  Good. It's important to never forget what kinds of shitty, backwards people vote for Republicans and what Republican trash does when it is in power. >
  
  The Republican war on women is a continuing atavistic reflex that they can neither disguise nor shed. It would be entertaining if it weren't so goddam dangerous. >
  
  The plan should be to keep abortion rights in the mind of the voters until the GOP is defunct.