comment: >
  
  Standardized testing is a controversial topic in education, with valid arguments on both sides. While it is true that standardized tests do not provide a complete picture of a student's abilities, they do serve a purpose in measuring certain aspects of a student's knowledge and skills. However, it is also important to recognize that these tests can be biased and may not accurately reflect a student's true abilities.
  One solution to this issue is to use standardized tests as just one of several factors in the admissions process. Other important factors such as transcripts, extracurriculars, volunteer and work experience, letters of recommendation, and essays should also be considered. This approach would provide a more balanced and comprehensive view of a student's abilities and potential.
  Furthermore, it is important to recognize that different majors may require different types of assessments. For example, creative writing may place more emphasis on originality and creativity, whereas a profession like medicine or law may require more technical knowledge and skills. Therefore, it would be more fair and accurate to tailor the assessment process to the specific requirements of each major.
  In conclusion, while standardized testing has its limitations, it can serve a purpose in the admissions process when used in conjunction with other factors and tailored to the specific requirements of each major. This approach would provide a more fair and accurate assessment of a student's abilities and potential
context: Colleges don't just look at standardized tests, they also look at transcripts, extracurriculars, volunteer and work experience, letters of recommendation, and essays.
  Standardized tests don't tell the whole story, but they do serve a purpose and are an important factor. >
  
  I agree that colleges consider a variety of factors when making admissions decisions, but my argument is that standardized tests are given too much weight in the process. These tests are often used as the primary or sole measure of a student's academic abilities, when in reality they only test a narrow range of skills and knowledge. Furthermore, standardized tests are known to be culturally and economically biased, which means that students from disadvantaged backgrounds are at a disadvantage.
  I also argue that a heavy emphasis on standardized testing can have negative effects on students and teachers. It can lead to a focus on test-taking strategies rather than real learning, and create a high-pressure environment that can have detrimental effects on mental health.
  Standardized tests can serve a purpose, but they should not be the only or primary measure of student performance. A more balanced approach that takes into account a variety of factors would be more fair and accurate. >
  
  They should be given more weight to certain majors and not to others. Creative writing is just that creative while medicine and law are professions that are “tested” each and every day in their work. College admissions shouldn’t be based on a free for all assessment. We are already seeing these things show discrimination due to sex, race, religion and other non standardized criterion.  Look at the Baake case and other similar ones going before the Supreme Court and in Texas. Diversity reigns not competence. This is the downfall of “higher” education.