comment: >
context: There are tons of old articles I can show you where people were saying cable modems were unnecessary because 56K was all that was needed.
  I had a 50 inch Plasma TV that I thought would never need replacing because I would never want/need a better picture.  I rejected Smart TV's thinking they were stupid, why do I need an internet browser on a TV. 
  Now, internet is more essential on a TV than a HDMI port.
  The TV has gone through so many iterations from black and white to color to big screen to HD to connected it is naive to think the current technology of your time is all that is needed and can't be improved. >
  
  Eh, apple TV or any other smart stick is way better than built in. Some have no ads which is way better >
  
  1) Difference between LED and OLED is massive. Anyone can easily notice the improvement.
  2) You are way off on your last point. SDR and HDR content is so easily distinguishable.
  3) 60Hz -> 120Hz is such a huge upgrade. You clearly have not experienced that it seems, my personal laptop is still 60Hz and whenever I have to use it, it sucks balls. >
  
  Yeah, the QDLED, OLED, and QDOLED all look VERY different and are huge improvements over standard LED, and could still use further improvements (more dimming zones with QDLED, less burn in and higher brightness with OLED and QDOLED). 
  HDMI 2.1 and high refresh rate are a huge MASSIVE improvement if you're a gamer, and more refreshrate is more better in all cases, so there's still room for improvement. 
  OP is crazy. >
  
  Totally agree, don’t get me wrong it can be impressive the quality when you see some specs side by side from different ones but once it’s in your home it’s good, great likely an improvement. Once you’re sat at home watching it you’re happy with it, you aren’t gonna remember the difference if there was a noticeable one.