comment: >
  
  There's a massive difference between printing a hard copy from a computer with no network access and transferring documents digitally.
  Some of these documents were likely handwritten or had handwritten notations on them, some come from sanitized computers like I mentioned above, and some are likely printouts of digital communications/reports that were previously sent digitally. We haven't heard much information about these documents other than that they were marked classified.
context: I hope Obama, Clinton and Bush ask to have National Archive staff scrub their offices too. All this stuff should be digital these days with better scrub tools. >
  
  The reason they aren't digital is because its harder for spies to obtain them. However, that was under the guise of spies not being in office capable of taking them. >
  
  
  The reason they aren't digital is because its harder for spies to obtain them.
  
  Wait…do you think these documents were created on a typewriter?