comment: >
  
  More projecting from the right
context: Tried to help her husband's political career and ended up destroying it and her own life in the process. >
  
  Supreme court material. >
  
  I don't know if I trust them to judge anything right or true anymore. >
  
  You shouldn’t. They’re blatantly corrupt. >
  
  I've been thinking about this and it's dawned on me that all current republican politicians are simply the kids of rich people. The kids of rich people that act out and are cruel because nobody ever held them accountable. >
  
  Yes. Like the other guy said, it's always been a class war dividing the few at the top from the rest of us. The cultures wars are manufactured to get people to vote Republican against their better interests.
  
  "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." -- LBJ
  
  It's absurd what goes on on Fox "News" to reach this end goal. They don't report on the news. It's all propaganda to make people vote in ways that hurt themselves just so they can hurt someone they don't like even more.
  And, unfortunately for society and humanity at large, it's incredibly effective. >
  
  Fox should be dismantled >
  
  Better yet... force them to live among their subjects instead of NY DC and LA >
  
  Notice how voter fraud isn't some invisible, untraceable thing. You can actually gather evidence, charge someone with it, and present it in a court of law. Who knew? >
  
  No that was a shitty thing to do. It was definitely called out for the wrong reasons at the time (unbecoming of a person in his position), but you can’t tell me he didn’t use his power to get an intern to give him a bj. We should call it out for what it is and not turn a blind eye to it. >
  
  Well, her side of the story is that she went after it, and she's an adult with agency. That said, he still had an obligation to say no. He has no way of knowing her mind in that moment (or at all). He needs to assume that the power dynamic is in play, and he needs to separate himself from that situation purely on those simple ethical grounds, let alone all of the unique things that come with his being POTUS at the time. 
  What Bill Clinton did was wrong. The reaction to it from the right and the gall of impeaching him for lying about it was over the top. >
  
  From all accounts that I’ve read she wanted to and everyone got off on the secrecy. There wasn’t an ‘I’m upper management, suck it or you’re fired” situation happening. She was pretty clear on her not feeling pressured into it.
  Was it ethical? Nope.
  Did two consenting adults make an unethical decision together regardless? Yaaass
  If anyone doesn’t “get it” at this point then I’m sorry- you most likely never will. >
  
  
  From all accounts that I’ve read she wanted to and everyone got off on the secrecy. There wasn’t an ‘I’m upper management, suck it or you’re fired” situation happening. She was pretty clear on her not feeling pressured into it.  
  Was it ethical? Nope.
  
  Monica Lewinski gave an incredibly nuanced interview a while back how #meetoo made here think about the power dynamics in their case. She still goes out of her way to make sure that, yes, it was her free decision and she wanted it but, in hindsight, it would have been ethical of Bill Clinton to not do it. >
  
  I was a kid when it happened but just think of how joyous and ravenous conservative talking heads and politicians were when they first found out about it on the news etc. They were probably literally salivating at the revelation when thinking of how they could spin it all to their advantage. Ethics has nothing of substance in politics. >
  
  The GOP is going to very publicly investigate and make an example of her, now that they finally have a verified case of voter fraud, right? /S >
  
  Any minute now.... Aaaaaaand now she's a senator. >
  
  About time. >
  
  Republican???
  checks article...
  Yep! >
  
  Party affiliation wasn't in the headline, that means republican. >
  
  Spicy layered meme, well played. >
  
  Where is the meme? This is just fact. >
  
  It's the same rhetoric those assholes use with the news "if they don't say the race, they're a minority" its just using their dumbass logic on them. >
  
  I've noticed the opposite. If American headlines don't mention someone's race, it's safe to assume they're white. >
  
  The party of law and order does it again! >
  
  Pfft, laws are for browns and poors! 
  What? Me?! I'm not poor! I'm just not rich yet!
  ...I was gonna slap "/s" on here...but is it really sarcasm anymore? >
  
  So not a brown, was she a poor? Unlikely given her husbands position >
  
  But she's married to a white guy. Changes a little >
  
  One shes a woman so shes looked down upon in republican circles anyways and shes a women of color ? Might as well be invisible, and her partner the straight white male would be the "figure head" of the family, it changes a lot when you are married to a "Straight white right wing male politician".
  Look at ole mitch mconnels wife, she is literally connected back to the CCP and ole donny barely attacked her..Then look at the attacks he made on every single democrat thats female or of color, "Mexicans"/"Pocahontas"/"Bleeding from somewhere" as long as you are on team grift they dont care. >
  
  Just another demonstration that voter fraud is extremely rare, and usually committed by Republicans. >
  
  And that it is actually catchable. If enough evidence is found.
  And they caught it in this relatively small House race. Under the biggest one, the Presidential race, with the most eyes, nothing came up as concrete as this case. >
  
  I remember at some point after the 2020 election, some Republicans insisting there was no evidence of the massive voter fraud they were claiming because Democrats were just that good at voter fraud.  Absence of evidence was actually proof of voter fraud in their minds. >
  
  Not the first time they believe something is there without evidence to prove its presence >
  
  My first thought, as well. >
  
  Voter fraud: a Republican's specialty >
  
  For real.  I don't recall any people committed fraud in the that election except Republicans. >
  
  While they're having a field day over Biden's document "scandal", they defend their false emperor in Trump over the same thing. They honestly think Trump legit stealing is the less than Biden finding out documents are found around his place. Who wants to bet Biden is gonna return the documents, no muss no fuss while defend Trump for theft? >
  
  They found them and reported it, which is the only reason we even know about them. My bet is that now they're going to dig through everything without any obstruction and make sure nothing else is there, like it should be. >
  
  
  My bet is that now they're going to dig through everything without any obstruction…
  
  Not “now”, though. Already happened. That’s how they found the second handful of documents. So on the one hand we have Biden, whose lawyers found less than 2 dozen documents and immediately took steps to turn them over and make sure there were no others. On the other, we have Trump who had literally hundreds of documents, fought against returning them for months and had people lie on his behalf about them.
  Edit: typo >
  
  Don’t forget the part where he sold a bunch to other nations. And probably buried more on his golf course. >
  
  I prefer to deal with what’s known rather than speculation. >
  
  Not only is it once again a Republican, but once again the system worked.  The person committing voting fraud got caught and also failed to influence the outcome of an election. >
  
  Her husband came in third in the republican primary. didn't affect anything. he got stomped. >
  
  Sounds like the perfect situation to put your neck on the line by committing voter fraud! >
  
  Remember, every accusation is a confession. >
  
  It’s always projection with the GOP. From voter fraud to cp & human trafficking, they’re always the folks committing the crimes they holler about dems doing. >
  
  I think it's a 'I do this (or would if I could) so everyone else must be'. >
  
  It's the Karl Rove playbook.
  
  Acknowledge (privately) you're doing something bad.
  Accuse your opponent of doing that bad thing first.
  When your own bad deeds are uncovered, accuse your opponent of making it up to distract from their own bad deeds from step 2.
  
  Repeat. >
  
  You notice how it's almost always extremist republicans, the party who wail about voter fraud who are then caught up in voter fraud cases. 52 counts of voter fraud?! If you're going to lose, lose and go to jail. >
  
  And I get the impression most of them are 'true believers'. They think, "well those dirty democrats are cheating left and right and getting away with it, it's only right that I do it as well to balance the scale." >
  
  Oh look. Voter fraud. From a republican. Mild shock >
  
  They telegraph their Playbook by accusing others of their own crimes. If THEY did it, surely everyone else does it too, right???? >
  
  Of course, it's a Republican. >
  
  Didn't even need to read the article to know. >
  
  And it's a republican. Please someone save me from this fucking timeline already. >
  
  Read this as “Iowa’s official wife” and my curiosity was quite piqued. >
  
  This is the type of asshole that would say “my husband needs to be elected to protect our freedom and democracy!”… while undermining democracy herself.
  Honestly, these pricks need to be charged  a count of voter fraud for all the VALID ballots cast because those are the ones she is effectively trying to disenfranchise. >
  
  50 I get. But 52?! Geez lady, that's just greedy. >
  
  Try not to commit any voter fraud on the way out to the parking lot! >
  
  Of course, it's a Republican. >
  
  How? How is it ALWAYS Republicans? >
  
  Gaslight
  Oppress
  Project >
  
  Fetterman still collecting on the Ken Paxton challenge? >
  
  I didn’t even have to check, of course it’s the party of fraud. >
  
  Republicans: "See, just like we told you.  Rampant voter fraud." >
  
  Brought to you by the party of projection. >
  
  As the old saying goes, “whoever smelt it dealt it” >
  
  As usual with the projection, I assume this is why Trump and others scream the election was rigged, because they cheated and still lost. >
  
  Damn democrats and their election stealing
  /s >
  
  Now they'll claim she was a democrat who did it to make republicans look bad -.- >
  
  A Republican? 6 hours of community service incoming! >
  
  Judges in this district have been giving prison time for monetary fraud cases. It's not the same but I'm seeing prison time, even if a few months, in her future. They've been wanting to set examples for all types of fraud >
  
  Nice to hear. I hope you’re right. >
  
  It's always Republicans. Why is it always bloody Republicans? >
  
  Lemme guess?  The rigging award goes to (drumroll), The GOP, again. >
  
  Bet on it every time, and you'll actually get bored of winning. >
  
  Well, I guess she loved him enough to go to jail for him, how sweet >
  
  'Prosecutors allege in an indictment unsealed Thursday that Phuong Taylor filled out voter registration forms or delivered absentee ballots for people in Sioux City’s Vietnamese community who had limited ability to read and understand English.'
  I got through this part and I was thinking "Maybe she was just trying to help voters cast their ballots? It says they weren't fluent in English".
  It was quickly downhill from there.
  'She filled out “dozens of voter registrations, absentee ballot request forms, and absentee ballots containing false information,” and delivered absentee ballots, sometimes without the knowledge of the people whose names were used, according to the indictment.' >
  
  Funny how when we see voter fraud actually happening, it seems to be almost exclusively done by the Republicans.
  It's almost like all of their wailing and gnashing of teeth about the 2020 election was just projection.... >
  
  Everything they do/say is projection. All of it. >
  
  Cool. So like 3 months deferred and a $50.00 fine. >
  
  Potentially fiver years per count of fraud. >
  
  She’s a Republican. She’ll get no time. Meanwhile, that woman who was told she could vote and did so, only to get arrested anyway, got years. >
  
  I think her husband threw her under the bus and she's going to prison.  You know Republican wives are easily replaceable. >
  
  especially if they arent white or have cancer >
  
  conservatives: "there is rampant voter fraud!"
  democrats: "based on what data?"
  conservatives: "we plead the fifth" >
  
  Of course, it’s a Republican. >
  
  Fake News.
  I've already hurd its another FALSE FLAG and she is actually a democRAT trying to make Trump and the REAL Republicans look bad.
  Most likely a psyop from the DS trying to practice for 2024.  It's proven fact.  There's a really good video on how she isn't real and is  a FAKE hollywood communist. >
  
  Poe's Law is missed more with every passing day. Because I genuinely cannot tell if this is sarcasm or straight up what you believe. >
  
  The “hurd” is a giveaway that it’s sarcasm. And the psyops, that’s an Elon specialty. >
  
  [rolls dice]
  "It says "Republican".  That's curious..." >
  
  And I would have gotten away with it if not for you meddling democrats >
  
  Fuck republicans. All of them. Anyone that voted R is absolutely against democracy. >
  
  At this point anyone voting republican is pretty much a racist, sexist, homophobic, anti democracy traitor. >
  
  don't forget transphobic! >
  
  How did 2000 Mules miss this??? >
  
  Why is it even legal for family members of people running for office to be involved with voting stations? >
  
  Ooh ooh let me guess!? Republican? I'm right you say? I'm shocked! Absolutely shocked. >
  
  Crazy how it’s actually the GOP doing the fraud! And they end up getting caught, almost like the epidemic of invisible voter fraud was made up >
  
  Read this as “Iowa’s official wife…” >
  
  My friend, me too, I'm really tired and I got really confused. >
  
  But, but Tucker and Hannity insist it’s The Libs and The Blacks and The Gays who do all the rigging! >
  
  Vote early, vote often. >
  
  Every accusation a confession. No exceptions. >
  
  Republican. Not some random idiot. Another Republican attacking democracy. All the news is the same: Republicans are waging war on democracy and the media is desperate to keep Americans ignorant about it. Rise up good people - we are under Republican attack. >
  
  without reading the story or any comments
  going to guess (R) >
  
  Every GOP accusation is actually an admission. >
  
  Let me guess. Republican. >
  
  Only checked to confirm this was a Republican. >
  
  Of course it was. >
  
  Haven't clicked yet. Let me guess.... Republican?
  clicks
  Shocker. >
  
  GOP: Good Old Projection >
  
  
  Republican nomination 
  
  What were the odds. >
  
  I also indict this guy’s wife. >
  
  And… they’re Republican. Go figure. >
  
  So Trump was right.  There was voter fraud. >
  
  Republicans kept on crying “Voter Fraud!”. Didn’t expect that they were actually rating themselves out. 99% of all actual voter fraud cases were done by Republican voters. >
  
  Republicans..always cheating, always corrupt >
  
  Yep.  Don't get me started on Republicans in my State :-( >
  
  Finally we have proof of voter fraud the republicans keep taking about... And it's a republican... Again. >
  
  It is important to hold those accountable. It's crucial to remember that voter fraud is exceedingly uncommon, typically isolated, and has no bearing on election results. >
  
  One of the smart ones, I see. 🙄. >
  
  George Santos campaign staffer?
  Is that even his real name? >
  
  I thought it was 23 last time I checked, she’s going for a record >
  
  Will be interesting to see if voter fraud just turns into one of those issues they go radio silent on, like Obamacare, or if UT turns into a pure projection type deal >
  
  52 how many times did this chick vote? Also damn get a hobby or something, she clearly has too much free time. >
  
  Republican?
  Yep... Republican. Digusting. >
  
  Has anyone checked how many fraudulent ballots boebert stuffed? >
  
  I’ll do anything for love and I will do that. 
  23 times >
  
  These investigations are fraudulent, they keep finding us guilty! >
  
  If she ends up in prison, I have no doubt that he'll just find a new wife. >
  
  It's disgusting to see the liberal media portray these 52 entirely unrelated accidents as some sort of conspiracy. >
  
  I’m not bothering to read the article. I’ll just assume that they’re republicans >
  
  How did you know? >
  
  The same way “politician arrested for trafficking/molesting children” headline will make me have the same reaction. It’s the party with no platform, save absolute projection.
  In this case it’s voter fraud. The shit republicans screeched about since 2016
  In a month Marjorie Taylor Green will admit she had abortions, after she sponsored some idiot bill about “saving children who survived abortion”. >
  
  "SIOUX CITY, Iowa (AP) — The wife of a northwestern Iowa county supervisor"
  ... wait for it....
  "has been charged with 52 counts of voter fraud after"
  ... wait for it....
  "she allegedly filled out and cast absentee ballots in her husband’s unsuccessful race"
  ... wait for it....
  "for a Republican nomination"
  ahhh yes.  there it is. >
  
  Iowa used to be a pretty progressive state. Now they have turned into Alabama of the midwest. >
  
  Every instance of actual recent voter fraud I've come across has been a Republican effort. 
  Here's an article about projection. >
  
  Why is it that all of the Voter Fraud cases involve Republicans? Are they the party of voter fraud? It appears that is the case. >
  
  Let me guess, Republican? >
  
  republicans = rules for thee, not for me. >
  
  Damn. The fraud count keeps going up.
  She’s screwed and probably so is he.
  Good. Fraud is for losers. >
  
  So there is voter fraud after all, huh… >
  
  Let me guess … a white Republican. 
  Ohhhh I’m right!  Go figure >
  
  Who else just knew it had to be a republican? >
  
  I don't even need to click or read any comments to know this is a Republican. >
  
  Republicans: We need to secure our elections!!! There's voter fraud happening!!! We know this because we're the ones doing it!!! >
  
  Once again a Republican accusation proves to be a Republican confession >
  
  The righteous GOP super triple cheat. >
  
  Further proof that every conservative accusation is a confession. >
  
  Republicans: "we cheated and lost, therefore, the other side must have cheated, too." >
  
  Surely one of these will be about a Democrat one day, and then the real fraud will be proven!!!one1! >
  
  Let me guess the defense:
  ' We all know the demoncrats are gonna cheat so we gotta cheat harder.. it's Gods will praise Trump!'
  The Supreme Court: 'Sounds legit' >
  
  What’s sad is she probably figured she’d never get caught because “all the democrats are using voter fraud” >
  
  I've seen a few cases where republicans got busted for voter fraud.
  Curious to know how many democrats got arrested for voter fraud? >
  
  Not gonna hold my breath on anything actually happening >
  
  104 years minimum seems fair. >
  
  I keep reading the headline as "Iowa's official wife" and every time I do a double take like "Iowa has an official wife???" >
  
  Just blame it on antifa/migrant gangs/Dems…. >
  
  Why do I still come and check? >
  
  I should really pay attention while reading I thought it was "Iowa's official wife" >
  
  My brain moved the ‘s to Iowa so I was very confused that Iowa had an “official wife” >
  
  I mean, if you're going to commit voter fraud you had better be getting at least dozens of votes out of it, I really can't believe those idiots that go to jail for one or two extra votes. >
  
  Lots of suspicious stuff in Iowa and Wisconsin. >
  
  I think Side Show Bob did it best. >
  
  Gotta love my funky brain initially reading this as “Iowa’s official wife” and I was like, the state has a wife??? Anyway glad she got charged. >
  
  I would use it to conquer, rule & unite the neighboring villages under 1 flag & begin my new order. >
  
  That number has gone up since the last time I heard about this story. >
  
  Let me guess. Republican? >
  
  It’s hilarious how the ones screaming about voter fraud and cheating are always the ones doing it.
  But, their excuse is that somehow the libs perfectly cover up their cheating and the media helps. It’s so delirious. It’s about as insane as thinking that Hunter’s laptop has anything juicy on it. Trumps party has had a copy of the hard drive on that thing and they know that if they released it; the conspiracy theory would die because there’s nothing there. It’s much more powerful to let the liens of the laptop keep growing. >
  
  I find it hilarious and pitiful. 52 counts? How fuxking stupid can you be? >
  
  Even more sick is that she took advantage of the Vietnamese community living there and was registering them to vote and used absentee ballots without many of their knowledge. 
  But, what makes it hilarious is that even with that cheating, the dude still lost haha >
  
  Why did I already know she's GOP? >
  
  I glad the Republicans are finally getting a handle on the pervasive voter fraud in the country. Who knew it was this bad. Oh wait, I’m seeing a pattern here? >
  
  Good thing Trump really made us focus on election fraud. How else would this have helped us catch so many Republicans committing election fraud without such heightened awareness?
  I would can it karma, but it's more like cosmic irony. >
  
  Conservatives - Why do your leaders commit so much crime? You sure know how to pick the losers with precision! >
  
  There it is. There's the word "Republican." >
  
  Yep, I scrolled till I saw it. No reading necessary. >
  
  I love when my imported Vietnamese wife commits voter fraud on my behalf, it's like, my favorite thing. >
  
  Funny how the loudest things Republicans shout about and accuse Democrats of doing, those are the things that they end up doing the most of. >
  
  In a surprise to literally nobody, the party that cries about voter fraud coming from their opposition, commits voter fraud themselves >
  
  Without looking let me guess..... republican >
  
  Republican. Again, we need to lead with that. I’m still genuinely searching for the democratic voter fraud I keep hearing about. I can only find republicans. >
  
  Haven't read the article, but I have a sneaking suspicion that they're Republican for some reason >
  
  i havent read the article, but i'm going to bet my life savings that shes republican. >
  
  This is what happens when people believe that propaganda so much about Democrats committing fraud, the Republicans think they have to do it to balance the scales. Then they learn why voting fraud is so uncommon. 
  The payoff is low. The risk of getting caught is high. >
  
  Funny how the party who's always screaming about voter fraud are always the ones getting caught committing voter fraud. >
  
  One more time - every accusation from a Republican turns out to be a confession.  Every.  Damn.  Time. >
  
  Republicans are pathetically hypocritical and embarrassingly poor at losing. Who knows what they'll do next time their daddy-god-emperor loses. >
  
  let me guess whitout reading the article.... republicans? correct me if I am wrong >
  
  Time to play guess the party! >
  
  At this point it’s not even a fair game. >
  
  Republican official, right? Just a guess. >
  
  Let me guess the political party. Someone tell me I guessed right with Republican. >
  
  Voter fraud? Must be a... yep. Republican. This is now factually standard. >
  
  Guess what party she's from. Go ahead, guess. >
  
  Tell me you're Republican without telling me you're Republican by committing voter fraud. >
  
  Lemme guess, not a dem?