comment: >
  
  Yawn... BUT WHEN? 🍿
context: As someone living in Georgia, Fani Willis is a badass. If anyone in the country would dare to do this it would be her. I'm not saying she will go for it. Just that if anyone ever will, she's one of the likeliest >
  
  Where have I heard this before? >
  
  The day the phone call was released, with your own ears. >
  
  In the phone call trump repeatedly insists he has won and Raffensperger should just find the votes that were stolen from him. At no point did he say he needs to cheat and make him win. We could say "yeah but we all know what he actually meant" all we want but that's not gonna work in court.
  The establishment does not want to rock the boat by going after a president, how hard is that to understand?! They let Reagan get away with secretly selling missiles to Iran to fund terrorists in South America, Bush got away with lying about WMDs in Iraq...and Trump will get away too. >
  
  Why wouldn’t it work in court. He asked for the exact delta that he needed to win >
  
  Because he is a part of the system and the system protects its members, even its most odious ones. >
  
  
  "Of course, all eyes continue to be on Georgia, where District Attorney Fani Willis really does seem to have what it takes," Kirschner said. "And I mean that both on the evidentiary front, she seems to have what it takes to bring charges, and on the determination front, because she has been sawing the justice wood in front of her and it sure feels like she is preparing to indict Trump and company."
  
  I am trying to keep my hope alive. >
  
  I heard Andrew Weissman say something about looking out for an announcement about charges on or just after the 24th of January.  I'm not sure why he said that specific date, but I'm primed for that time since for some reason, it seems to line up to me like a reasonable time period following the special grand jury being wrapped up.  Everything takes "two weeks", and it may be in a grand jury's hands already (to indict - the special grand jury was not for that, only for investigative purposes), so the end of the month should be fun, hopefully!  Superbowl season will be wild! >
  
  Re the specific date, the judge who oversaw the special grand jury has scheduled a hearing on that day to decide a technical question about the report (whether the report constitutes “presentment”), which will decide if the report will be made public. >
  
  Thanks >
  
  I also have what it takes to indict Trump.  So does everyone with an internet connection.
  The question isn't whether they HAVE enough to indict him, it's about whether someone will actually finally pull the fucking trigger and do it. >
  
  I don't understand how the phone call to Raffsenberger(sp?) isn't enough on its own. >
  
  If you or I had made that call it would be. >
  
  So do it then >
  
  Then do it. 
  Stop talking about it.  Stop talking about maybe doing it. Stop talking about possibly doing it and just f—ing do it. 
  Just do it. >
  
  Justice DELAYED is Justice DENIED