comment: >
  
  Sorry but that definition sounds very silly. By definition, endgame implies finality; the end of the road. Reaching this so-called “endgame” implies you cannot achieve higher. This concept revolving around anything in tech is basically laughable as tech will always improve and always innovate. I don’t buy that “endgame” just means “good enough for now”. That’s not what that word means or how it is used. You can always buy something better, or innovate/improve something, so factually “endgame” regarding most products does not exist.
context: “Endgame” doesn’t exist. People will say each new board they get is endgame until they end up with a collection of TGR’s with og ncr caps and hyper expensive frankenswitches and realize they’ve spent thousands upon thousands of dollars on aluminum rectangles and pieces of plastic. >
  
  Endgame does exist, but is not necessarily a permanent state.
  If you look at your current setup, and can't imagine anything better suited for you than what you currently have, you're at endgame.
  Reaching that point doesn't necessarily demand a huge outlay of cash either.
  If something better comes out down the road, or you end up imagining something better, you will drop out of endgame status, until you have acquired the new endgame setup.