comment: >
  
  Well their definition of CRT is 'anything that makes white people feel guilty'... so ya know, actual history is the target of their agenda.
context: Who could've guessed that voters would be more concerned with real issues than imaginary ones? >
  
  As a high school teacher, although things have generally calmed down from the height of the pandemic, I don’t necessarily think it’s that people have suddenly started seeing that all these right wing talking points are made up bullshit.
  It was pretty damn disconcerting how many of my boomer-and-older relatives asked me about “furries” in my school this holiday season. Even people who I generally thought knew better. >
  
  Crazy that that whole thing was because of “go buckets” in classrooms in case of a mass shooting event :/.  Not really the gotcha that they thought it was, and in fact highlights issues that they actively avoid talking about. >
  
  What is a go bucket?  Is … is it a bucket for the kids to piss in during an active shooter situation? >
  
  Yes >
  
  JFC America.  How does that sort of thing make people stop and think for a second?  It’s like the old Indian meme ‘DEsiGnATeD’ >
  
  Oh don’t worry it’s not just for that.
  It’s also for when a student gets shot, they can quickly soak up the blood!
  Most reasonable Americans realize the system is broken. It’s the insane and evil ones holding us all back. Plus even left leaning people lately are buying into gun culture out of the (justifiable) fear that one of their maga neighbors will shoot them up for having a pride flag >
  
  It's almost like people figured out that CRT isn't being taught in public school. Who knew people could see through BS. >
  
  It was also largely about getting materials they didn’t want out of school and public libraries. Unfortunately, that worked. >
  
  It's about slowly killing public schools and getting tax money to religious schools. >
  
  then end game is to give money directly to religious home schoolers. it's been a grift all along. >
  
  Can't risk children being exposed to anyone who votes different than their parents >
  
  Critical thinking skills?  But think of the CHILDREN! >
  
  I don't like how the headline doesn't acknowledge it's made up in the first place. Like it's an actual policy.