comment: >
context: Uh oh. SBF is alledged to have diverted customer funds to invest in "Mysten Labs and fintech company Dave". $100m each. 
  Dave is publicly traded. Current price is 52 Week High $15, 52 Week Low $0.25. Soon to be even less if they claw back. >
  
  Current market cap of DAVE is about $102.6 million. Take away $100 million of that and there won’t be enough left to stay listed. >
  
  Puts on DAVE >
  
  Not sure puts would pay off when the company gets de-listed tho? >
  
  Dave’s not here man! >
  
  I understood that reference. >
  
  There must have been some point where SBF and his management team transitioned from running a mere ponzi scheme to thinking they had carte blanche to do whatever they wanted with the monopoly money they could create indefinitely.
  For once, I actually want a docuseries about this. I understand people who had reasonable trust in this company lost dearly, but I think it would even make a great sitcom. This is hilarious. One of the companies was called "Dave"? Like, really? "Dave"? >
  
  Any documentary that doesn't go into the polycule thing they had going on is a failure in my book. >
  
  We also need it to cover the girl taking amphetamines and tweeting about it >
  
  Dave?
  The company is called Dave? >
  
  The Republic of Dave >
  
  They also used tokenized stocks to manipulate the stock market >
  
  This headline is a total puff piece to make SEC look good. It can easily be misinterpreted like the SEC was investigating FTX before the bankruptcy. They were not. Let’s be honest, not only did the SEC have no clue what was going on at FTX, the chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler was meeting with SBF multiple times to regulate crypto in conditions favorable to FTX. And Alameda’s CEO father once worked with Gary Gensler. The whole thing stinks of corruption and the SEC is trying to wash it off.
  I don't know what's going on with mainstream media. Back in November, they were on their hands and knees ready to suck-off SBF.