comment: >
  
  Covid is not gone.  It's not even weaker.  It's just looking for a way around treatments and vaccines.  But hundreds are dying from it in the US every day.  As long as this continues, it makes no sense to disallow Title 42 operations.
context: The White House knows they have the authority to overturn Trump’s executive order, but is deferring to the supreme court, so they don’t have to make that hard call.  Of course, there is no good scenario for what will happen when the order is lifted. Due to Trump’s executive order, there is an immigration backlog combined with a massive increase from unstable countries.  
  We are not prepared for the level of immigrants who will be seeking asylum.  And the White House knows what conservative media will be headlining, “the invasion caused by Biden”.  It’s really a no-win situation.  Of course America refused asylum for some Jewish immigrants during the 30s and we know how that turned out.  
  At some point, Democrats and Republicans are going to have to come together and pass immigration reform.  But I don’t have a lot of hope for that. >
  
  I’m not really for or against, but if we want to admit people for seeking asylum then we need to do that for Cubans too. Unfortunately Biden admin just wants to grant citizenship to those at the us/Mexico border and, for Cubans they get, “Allow me to be clear: If you take to the sea, you will not come to the United States,”. It’s a double standard that I really don’t understand the basis of. Aside from the fact that most Cubans come in and vote republican and most from the us/Mexico border come in and vote Democrat. That can’t be the real reason though, maybe I’m missing something. >
  
  Title 42 was put in place by an executive order. It should be able to be removed by the same thing. SCOTUS is compromised. >
  
  DACA was also put in by executive order. SCOTUS stopped Trump from ending that. >
  
  I don't understand the right wanting Title 42. It's about COVID, which they claim is nothing more than a common cold and that it's no threat at all. 
  Also, immigrants have less covid than the American population, so even as a rational person I don't see the logic. >
  
  “Give me your tired, your poor,  your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” This country’s greatness and true genius lies in its diversity.[Except if you are from Mexico, India, Afghanistan and any country that borders these countries but not US and A] >
  
  WTAF??!! Then homeland needs to create a system that works for immigration. It’s broken. Fix it! That’s where I want my money to go! >
  
  America has had waves of immigration throughout our history.  I’d like to say it’s only the current toxic political environment that is different now, but in the early 1900’s, a group of politicians demanded restrictions on immigration including a literary test, the Chinese Exclusion Act, the Alien Contract Labor Law, quota laws, and the National Origins Act Laws.  
  And in the 1930s, during World War II, America rejected asylum for many Jewish immigrants who were forced to return to Europe with many dying in the Holocaust.
  Today, you have politicians who politicize human beings, bussing them out for soundbites and clicks, to gain favor with their anti-immigration base.  If only they would put as much effort into working across the aisle to come up with long term solutions for immigration reform. >
  
  As cynical as this all is, the SCOTUS just did the Biden administration a favor, and the Biden administration knows it. >
  
  Total win. The shitshow at the border will get cranked to 11 once title 42 is gone. The people operating Joe Biden would like to avoid that if possible, and having SCOTUS do the dirty work gives them someone else to blame.