comment: >
  
  Ok what if I made the worst movie in existence and entitled it “terrible horrible movie”
  Would you defend the movie, saying it’s true to the title?
context: I found the beginning a little hard to get through cause some of the characters obnoxious and annoying, but I found it to be a fun watch in the end. And that's all that matters to me, if I have fun watching it, it's a good movie in my books. I did still like the first movie way more though. >
  
  I didnt mind it at all at the start but i hate how people call this movie a masterpiece and give it such high reviews. >
  
  Haha yeah, "masterpiece" is a bit of a stretch >
  
  I didnt mind 1 or 2 people call it a masterpiece but when i went to YouTube videos and different blogs searching why did everyone like this film and saw so many different people call it a masterpiece it really got to my nerves like a fucking virus! >
  
  I thought it was a lot of fun. Kinda movie where you turn your brain off for two hours and don’t think too deeply about it. >
  
  Then it shouldn't have been named Glass Onion: Knives Out
  Because i didnt really expect the sequel to Knives out be a turn brain off movie, i dont mind turn brain off movies but Knives Out and Glass Onion are like Two sides of the same coins, the same thing yet so different. >
  
  Yeah it wasn’t very good. Felt like a cartoon… and the ending was so underwhelming? They basically said: “it can’t be him, that would be too dumb and obvious”…. “Oh wait it actually was him.”
  Congrats you just called your own twist predicable >
  
  I hate the argument people make for this film that the film is exactly like the title implies. It is a Glass Onion, something that you WOULD except to be deep and have so many layers but at the end it was so transparent............ 
  A mystery film............. Transparent as a fucking Glass Onion..........