comment: >
  
  Folks heard the loudest sigh of relief coming from the oval office.
context: Justice Gorsuch
  
  I always find it funny when these conservative chuckle-fucks randomly find the line they don't want to cross, even though they have been doing much worse of the same kind of bullshit.
  Hey Gorsuch, nice to see you finally woke the fuck up from your power nap. Welcome to reality where the Supreme Court can't be trusted anymore to do the right thing. Moronic judges can't even obey the law and sure as fuck don't think it applies to them or their treason backing wives. >
  
  His appointment was complete BS, but he’s next to Roberts in sometimes holding opinions I can respect. 
  Alito, Beer Bro, I’ll ask my husband, and walking HR violation… nope. >
  
  
  “The court is not going to decide until June, apparently, and in the meantime, we have to enforce it. But I think it’s overdue,” Biden told reporters when asked about the high court’s decision. >
  
  If I recall there was a ruling Bush W. Didn't like but said it has to be followed too? >
  
  Or what? >
  
  some of y’all in the comments would have defended dread Scott >
  
  And some apparently want to turn the US into Venezuela. >
  
  Probably a blessing for him honestly. Takes the decision out of his hands, doesn't force him to make a tough choice with a lot of pressure coming at him from both parties over immigration. So no matter what side of the immigration issue you're on, you can't say it's his fault. >
  
  The immigrants stuck in border camps don’t consider this a blessing. The human rights community doesn’t consider this a blessing. Sure it’s a “political win” but it has deadly consequences >
  
  That's what Republicans want. >
  
  it’s what the us government wants. >
  
  this is literally the policy of the current us government. Don’t know why this is being downvoted. The fact that right wing policy persists during a dem administration just shows how institutionalized right wing immigration policy is in this county. Just because a democrat becomes president, it doesn’t change the current structure of our institutions >
  
  I mean the US policy on immigration is pretty left wing if you compare to what Italy Spain Greece and Hungary do >
  
  US immigration policy is amongst the most generous in world even with “Remain in Mexico” in place. Honestly, it’s how it should work anyways if we’re keeping the idea of nation states as a thing. >
  
  Funny story, there's already a precedent for that and we don't have to look at Trump.
  Worcester v Georgia 1832, "John Marshall has made his decision now let him enforce it.” 
  Granted in that case the president's choice directly lead to genocide, but my actual point is the the nation has survived President's telling the court to go fuck themselves before and will survive it again. Concern trolling about the sanctity of the court is just apologia for inhuman conditions perpetuated by xenophobic bigots and racists. >
  
  in fact, even just the threat of sidestepping the court can force them to moderate. FDR spent a whole year threatening them with expansion until they backed off of their quest to repeal certain parts of the new deal >
  
  No you don't. Just don't enforce it. Nothing's gonna happen. There's precident for this somewhere between 2016 and 2020. >
  
  All I gotta say is no, you really don't have to enforce it. >
  
  Yeah, don’t enforce it and create a constitutional crisis. Great idea. >
  
  Ignoring the constitutional crisis that the court is already creating by ignoring the fact they are overstepping their boundaries? 
  When they stopped Trump from ending DACA, it was on the grounds he didn't follow the proper procedures. But that he could still end it, as long as he followed proper procedure. There is no legitimate argument the states have to dictate a sitting president who follows proper procedures to end Title 42.