comment: >
  
  Imagine paying $44 billion for a broom closet.
context: The cause of this Twitter outage is unclear.
  
  Followed immediately by:
  
  Twitter has laid off nearly 75% of its staff, according to some estimates. >
  
  Correlation is not causation!
  ...but maybe this time. >
  
  Occam's Razor >
  
  I tried to shave with that once, but it didn't work, because my electric was simpler. >
  
  This muppet was talking about unplugging production servers and "omg nothing happened, this is easy" last week, so this seems about right. >
  
  "Why do we even have IT people? Everything works flawlessly. Fire those useless sods!" >
  
  Elon Musk is really killing Twitter. >
  
  Andrew Tate got destroyed by Greta on Twitter and it implodes.
  She’s destroyed the space along with the person! >
  
  oh? What'd Greta say? >
  
  Tate went out of his way to ask for her on Twitter her email to show off his list of expensive cars that burn gas to her.
  She responded by saying her email is smalldickenergy@getalife.com
  Edit:wording >
  
  damn, when people said greta should enjoy her childhood, this is what im looking for. >
  
  “The cause of this Twitter outage is unclear. Twitter has laid off nearly 75% of its staff, according to some estimates. Elon Musk took over the site in late October. Twitter no longer has a communications department.”
  Yeah, it’s a mystery isn’t it? >
  
  Legitimately surprising it took this long for wheels to start to come off, tbh. Those 75% should be damned proud. >
  
  I figured foreign government hacking groups would be champing at the bit to take Twitter down. Maybe now they're finally done siphoning all the intelligence data and can go about its destruction. >
  
  I thought Elon and his followers said Twitter could be ran with 20 people in a broom closet?