comment: >
  
  It has nothing to do with your current salary.
context: Next do ranked-choice voting and/then local political transparency and school board transparency. >
  
  I've come around to approval voting as probably better, but I'll take RCV happily. >
  
  It's a good thing to have multiple types of voting out there (if only to give people some data on what types work best in which situations.) I'm happy to see we're trying to improve our system. >
  
  This seems like a good thing; I’m interested to hear how I’m wrong if anyone has a good argument >
  
  If the high end of the posted pay range is 70k higher than the low end, it wouldn’t be very helpful in determining whether the job is worth pursuing. 
  That’s almost more deceptive tbh >
  
  Unless you’re making 10K a year