comment: >
  
  If he got in with false information that nullifies his election.
context: Santos should be impeached. Even his own party should have nothing to do with him >
  
  can't be impeached until he is seated in the House >
  
  Condemnation and ostracization from the Republicans, then impeachment. None of it will happen and now we're stuck with this twit.
  And where were all the NYC newspapers, including Newsday? They completely fell down on this. >
  
  Maybe they all turned off their brains once he said he was gay, jewish Republican .   for some reason that made him above questioning.   Anyway , I think being stuck with him for 2 years is a good lesson for everyone:  don't assume and ask questions >
  
  How has nobody sued him yet? >
  
  sued him for what and on what basis ?   what laws did he break?  why didn't anyone or any organization fact check him before the election? >
  
  Fraud and wire fraud for starters. >
  
  Santos is defrauding us all. We all pay federal taxes. Those federal taxes will pay his salary.
  He's defrauded every American taxpayer. >
  
  Long Island is filled with corruption and fraud. At some point you have to think they like it. >
  
  I'm surrounded by these people. It's gotten to the point that I can't even look at my neighbors. >
  
  Wish I could read this cause I’d really like to know more. >
  
  He is still more honest politician than Kyrsten Sinema. >
  
  For now, but he hasn't had the opportunity to backstab his constituents yet. Give him time. >
  
  What recourse do citizens have when someone gets elected under false pretenses?