comment: >
  
  This seems like a good thing; I’m interested to hear how I’m wrong if anyone has a good argument
context: Next do ranked-choice voting and/then local political transparency and school board transparency. >
  
  I've come around to approval voting as probably better, but I'll take RCV happily. >
  
  It's a good thing to have multiple types of voting out there (if only to give people some data on what types work best in which situations.) I'm happy to see we're trying to improve our system.