comment: >
  
  Give em your charms then.
  (Gen kill ref)
context: I don't even understand what your point is. No one thinks people who aren't in ID are in ID lmao. >
  
  So there’s the old people I was arguing with online.  The army is introducing this thing called H2F.  It’s an athletic program that hasn’t reached the army (probably never.  Some units have it).  They allow soldiers to be properly rested, warmed up, injury prevention, proper nutrition and proper training based off job training.  That’s good right? Nah.  We got old people who served in the gulf war crying because not everyone has to endure sleep deprivation.  I’m saying, I’d rather have our non-combat soldiers be proficient in their MOS more than their capability to “embrace the suck”.  The army needs its nerds. >
  
  Yeah, I see where that's headed. We had something similar in the Army which I agree was bullshit, but combat readiness is very, very important.
  I think the physical standards need to change, the Army APFT is fucking stupid to begin with, but yeah we don't need G1s going through rucks and what not. >
  
  I think the ACFT isn’t that bad of a metric.  The bare minimum for the entire test is very passable, even if you’re a scrawny kid that plays Halo.  The APFT doesn’t do anyone any favors and to be honest, it was always swept under the rug if the soldier was super smart.  Combat readiness is important but, the army needs everyone else to make that happen. >
  
  *personnel is not