comment: >
  
  Even if this were to happen Thomas would ignore the subpoena.
context: How is it possible to believe that she sent those emotional, overwrought texts to Mark Meadows, but didn't discuss anything with her own husband?  It's just not plausible. >
  
  She said she felt better after a chat with her husband, and then said in closing that they never talk about her work.
  How did he make her feel better after she just had an emotional outburst like she described?
  What did Clarence Thomas say that assuaged her worries? >
  
  "Who put this pubic hair on my Diet Coke?" >
  
  Don't remind me. 🤢🤮 >
  
  Someone please fill those of us in who don't want to be reminded yet.
  Edit: thx much and happy new year to everyone >
  
  That's how Thomas sexually harassed Anita Hill as she stated during his confirmation hearing. >
  
  Not just Hill. He was constantly talking about pornography, sex, and other work inappropriate topics throughout his career. Women of course, to make them uncomfortable and exude "power," but men in his various offices have often admitted that he was a fucking weirdo. The guy would literally roll in on a Monday and over coffee and bagels casually mention, "I saw this movie where a woman was fucked by a dog over the weekend. Wild, right?"  
  If his career had begun in the modern day any half-competent HR department would have had him drummed out within six months. >
  
  The bestiality angle always amazes me.
  You are a Judge, whose judgement is so shit you think its perfectly acceptable and totally normal to discuss hardcore beastiality, in the workplace.
  A Supreme Court Judge y'all. >
  
  This was fine with the 90s GOP.
  Their degeneracy in the service of their ideology is nothing new. >
  
  Ah, the era of Newt Gingrich >
  
  Clarence Thomas has already demonstrated that he has no problem whatsoever lying under oath >
  
  Because it's too late for that. >
  
  He can be subpoenaed. Not by J6Comm but he’s not immune. >
  
  Who is going to issue a subpoena? The DOJ? >
  
  That’s what the article says. The DOJ have a grand jury seated to get after the J6 shenanigans. Any subpoena would come from them.