comment: >
  
  This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 80%. (I'm a bot)
  
  
  Human Rights Watch on Tuesday called on Ukraine to investigate its military's alleged use of landmines near the eastern Ukrainian city of Izyum.
  The human rights group found physical evidence of landmine use - including unexploded mines, the remnants of mines, the metal cassettes that carry the mines and the blast signatures of mines - at seven of the nine locations in Izyum.
  Human Rights Watch noted that Ukraine is a signatory of the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, which banned the use of landmines.
  
  
  Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukrainian^#1 Human^#2 Rights^#3 Mine^#4 Izyum^#5
context: I understand why they’re using them and think it might be justified. But it’s important to remember that the most frequent victims of land mines are civilians, long long after the actual war has ended.
  I wish Ukraine luck but also I hope they’re keeping track of where they lay mines >
  
  I bet that among the list of training that the Ukrainian military received documenting landmine placement was on the list. >
  
  I hope so, and I imagine that's true from a top-down perspective. But I suspect that the lower level troops, many of whom are not professionals, are probably a little more focused on rapid deployment rather than perfect documentation. Which is understandable, if not ideal >
  
  Hey you getting invaded by your neighbour, the one that promised to never attack you. And NATO persuaded you to give up your nukes for and in return protect you. Whose military are committing atrocities to your civilian populations. You shouldn’t use some of your weapons against them. Because you promised. 
  Yeah this is pretty weird to me. Maybe focus on what Russians are doing there. The Ukrainians really don’t want to be mining their own country.