comment: >
  
  Honesty at this point chatGPT will say anything confidently, it doesn’t mean it’s right
  If you ask about elections in Saudi Arabia they will talk confidently about it, even though Saudi Arabia doesn’t have elections
context: This is ChatGPt's response to your question:
  
  The effect of AI software like ChatGPT on political systems and stability is not certain and will likely depend on various factors such as the way the technology is developed and implemented, the regulations governing its use, and how society chooses to use it. AI has the potential to bring about positive changes, such as improving decision-making and reducing political polarization, but also has the potential to cause harm, such as exacerbating existing inequalities and destabilizing the balance of power. Ultimately, the impact of AI on politics will depend on how responsibly and ethically it is used. >
  
  Thoughts on that response line by line.
  
  The effect of AI software like ChatGPT on political systems and stability is not certain and will likely depend on various factors such as the way the technology is developed and implemented, the regulations governing its use, and how society chooses to use it.
  
  Correct, but also cannot really be wrong, as the sentence says almost nothing.
  
  AI has the potential to bring about positive changes, such as improving decision-making and reducing political polarization, but also has the potential to cause harm, such as exacerbating existing inequalities and destabilizing the balance of power.
  
  Now it appears to be just saying stuff that's associated with the topic without really knowing what it's saying. There's no reason to believe that AI will "[reduce] political polarization" or "[destabilize] the balance of power." AI helping "improve decision-making" is likely true with a giant asterisk, and "exacerbating existing inequalities" is also a fair statement, though I think the issue is not that simple. (AI can both raise and lower barriers of entry into certain areas.)
  
  Ultimately, the impact of AI on politics will depend on how responsibly and ethically it is used.
  
  It seems thoughtful but again it's noncommittal.
  The overall message "We don't know" is a fair assessment of the situation, and it is the type of answer you would hear from an expert if you asked them (missing the details, though), but in general more people would sound like experts if they responded to questions with "it depends."