comment: >
  
  Bibi will be very pleased to be getting back to rattling his sabres instead of meeting his lawyers.
context: Unconfirmed report that an Iranian high ranking officer visited one of the attacked sites to see the damages and got taken out in another recent attack.
  Again, this is unconfirmed, source is Israeli TV channel 12 1~ hour ago, waiting for TimesofIsrael or Jpost to publish something about it so I can post it as well, but ill add it here for now.
  Edit"
  Sorry everyone still haven't found anything to mention regarding the high ranking officer, only place I heard anything about it was on TV during a live broadcast.
  View this as unconfirmed, if I find something I'll update the OP and make a new post.
  EDIT2'
  A certain concerned user has asked me to stop spreading misinformation, so I'm going to stop.
  This is me stopping.
  ;) >
  
  
  Iranian high ranking officer
  
  I figured they'd have learned to watch for stuff coming out of the sky by now. >
  
  they found the main weakness...  peripheral vision. >
  
  That and high explosives. >
  
  Technically it was a sky knife. >
  
  As someone on NCD dubbed it, a rocket-propelled slap chop >
  
  This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 80%. (I'm a bot)
  
  
  Iran on Monday warned Israel "Not to play with fire," and threatened retaliation over Israel's reported involvement in a weekend drone attack on a key defense facility in the city of Isfahan.
  A Wall Street Journal report which also pointed the finger at Israel for the attack noted its timing came at the same time as talks between Jerusalem and Washington aimed at finding new ways to counter Tehran's nuclear program.
  Last week, Israel and the US launched a large-scale joint exercise in Israel and over the eastern Mediterranean Sea, reportedly aimed at showing adversaries, such as Iran, that Washington is not too distracted by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and threats from China to mobilize a large military force.
  
  
  Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Tehran^#1 Israel^#2 Iran^#3 nuclear^#4 attack^#5 >
  
  “We can walk, chew bubble gum, and kick both Russian and Iranian asses at the same time, Jack” - r/DarkBrandon >
  
  Israel isn't going to need any help >
  
  Cool, so we can stop giving them billions in aid every year? >
  
  "Giving" is such a naive word to use, there's nothing free in this world >
  
  I think it's naive to say Israel doesn't need help when the US has been helping them since the 1960s.
  Not to say the US shouldn't be helping, just that they are. >
  
  The western world is getting what they are paying for, it ain't free >
  
  What are we getting?
  I just love how even asking this question is downvoted by Israelis. Really shows their good faith! lol >
  
  They are extremely important to regional security in the middle east for many reasons >
  
  Iran to Israel "Go away or i will taunt you a second time!!!!"!! >
  
  I fart in your general direction! >
  
  Play with fire?
  They just did a spinning fire dance. They don’t give a fuck. >
  
  If somebody attacks you and all you do is warn them… you are clearly scared >
  
  Iran has made it clear to the rest of the world that 14 year old girls not wearing magic hats is an existential threat to their regime. The biggest display of power they can muster is raping, torturing, and murdering their own unarmed civilians. >
  
  That is one of the worst attempts at whataboutism i have read. >
  
  Honestly I think he was just joking. If he was doing real whataboutism I feel like he would have hammered it a bit more. >
  
  Poe's Law.
  I wouldn't assume it's a joke, because most sincere whataboutism attempts are just that lazy. >
  
  Just because someone called it a law once doesn't necessarily mean it's true 100% of the time. It doesn't hurt to assume someone is acting in good faith every once in awhile. >
  
  That's what a law is. Not a rule but a very likely explanation. >
  
  Israel: bombs 5-6 different locations across Iran
  Iran: You better knock this off, you're playing with fire if you keep this up...
  big, strong Iran >
  
  "God damn it man, I swear if you guys bomb me 13 or 14 more times, I'm out of here" >
  
  yeah, but you’re a little bitch! >
  
  Oh come on.   
  According to Iranian officials it was only minor damage to a roof. Sounds like a harmless prank that's gone a bit too far.    
  Just write them a check for 100 monies or so. >
  
  
  it was only minor damage to the roof 
  
  Chernobyl here, I agree with your sentiment!  Just a bit of minor roof damage on our end too!  This will all blow over in a few days. 
  P.s. totally understand the humor in your comment, and for fear of the reddit mob must put a /s in mine. >
  
  
  This will all blow over in a few days.
  
  I see what you did there... >
  
  Iran has already threatened to nuke Israel off of the face of the earth. So, it is kind of hard to up the ante after that. "Don't 'play with fire' or we'll, hmm. We'll.. nuke you even more! (when we get one)" >
  
  Yep. Iran has no where higher to go on the escalation ladder after repeatedly and loudly proclaiming that their goal is to eradicate Israel. The islamist regime of Iran has already made their war on Israel an existential conflict. >
  
  I'm curious as to why. AFAIK Persians are generally very keen to differentiate themselves from Arabs and the beef with Israel was mostly because of Arabs/Palestine anyway, is there some problem that Muslims in general have with Israel? I remember reading somewhere that Muslims consider both Jews and Christians legit cos they follow the same God as Islam, why are so many Muslim countries so anti-Israel? Even Pakistan and Bangladesh agree with one another on the anti-Israel stuff, and Bangladesh fought a war to separate from Pakistan. >
  
  The Shia islamists in Iran want leadership of the Muslim world >
  
  That's quite ambitious considering most Muslims are Sunni and Saudi Arabia, who controls both Mecca and Medina still doesn't really have leadership of the Muslim world. Seems crazy to me that they'd believe they can even do it in the first place. >
  
  Twelver Shi'ism 
  
  Twelver Shīʿīsm (Arabic: ٱثْنَا عَشَرِيَّة; ʾIthnā ʿAšarīyah), also known as Imāmīyyah (Arabic: إِمَامِيَّة), is the largest branch of Shīʿa Islam, comprising about 85 percent of all Shīʿa Muslims. The term Twelver refers to its adherents' belief in twelve divinely ordained leaders, known as the Twelve Imams, and their belief that the last Imam, Imam al-Mahdi, lives in Occultation and will reappear as The promised Mahdi (Arabic: المهدي المنتظر). According to the Shīʿa tradition, the Mahdi's tenure will coincide with the Second Coming of Jesus (ʿĪsā), who, along with Mahdi, would kill the Dajjal.
  
  ^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5) >
  
  I don’t think the Israelis are playing >
  
  Israel snickering: "Ok. hehehe" >
  
  Comments like these are why I love Reddit >
  
  Says the country with hit squads roaming the earth. >
  
  They both have them no? >
  
  Whos gonna win out in this thread, the anti israel crowd or the anti iran crowd? >
  
  Can’t we just all agree that they both suck? >
  
  I don't know, Israel is definitely the good guy in this situation >
  
  How? Whats their reason for attacking iran? >
  
  Idk if there's a more specific reason than this but the Iranian government does constantly threaten to destroy Israel entirely, so it's not as though Israel is entirely devoid of justification when it comes to Iran. It also just so happens that people don't like the Iranian government more than usual right now cos they're being shitheads to their own people and supporting Russia against Ukraine. >
  
  Israel has been shit to “their” people for way longer than iran, i dont see how israel has the moral highground to do anything here. 
  Your first point is ok tho, but doesnt really justify an actual attack because there is no intel or anything that iran is actually doing anything. >
  
  Well I don't like a lot of Israel's actions either, the situation in Gaza is bad and Israel should be condemned for their forced evictions and the innocent Palestinians killed by the Israeli armed forces. 
  But when it comes to the moral high ground in an Iranian-Israeli conflict specifically, in my mind Iran has even less - not least because Israel didn't really do anything to Iran to instigate Iran's hated of it other than just being a Jewish state trying to exist in the middle east. >
  
  What you gonna do? Train terrorist groups to harm Israel? Threaten it with extermination? What are you going to do what you haven’t done yet? Because we all know that the Ayatollah regime is to chickenshit to do anything more than what they haven’t done already. 
  Fuck that Ayatollah regime. You know what was the most baffling thing about these attacks? The list of possible perpetrators is so fucking long. Literally any nation, ethnicity or group could in the region could have done it: Americans, Israelis, Ukrainians, Aserbaidschan, Turkey, the Afghan Taliban, Syrian rebel groups, Kurds, anti-Regime Iranians, anti-Hezbollah Lebanese, some Central Asian nations, some Arab gulf nations, some other Arab nation wanting to get along with Israel, some European nations helping Ukraine, Iraqis fighting Iranian influence or even Syrian regime people wanting get rid of Iranian influence. And the fucking list could go on… isn’t that a sign big enough to make clear that nobody likes them? Maybe it’s time to reflect on your decades long gasoline and lighter-foreign policy? >
  
  I don't think Israel gives a single shit about Iran's opinions.
  They can attack Iran's military infrastructure with impunity & Iran apparently cannot do a single thing about it.
  I hope they don't stop & it gives the people of Iran a chance to eliminate their government. >
  
  Until the one day Iran does do something >
  
  Like what? Invade Israel? Fire rockets in return? >
  
  I don’t know that’s for the government of Iran to decide >
  
  What do you know then? That hypothetically something can happen that didn't happen before? You're a philosophical giant :) >
  
  Israel: We're not playing with fire, we're playing with explosives >
  
  "How dare you use your drones to destroy our factory that was making drones to destroy hospitals and apartment buildings!...Wait...Are we the bad guys?" >
  
  
  Wait...Are we the bad guys?
  
  They'll only care about their public image when the checks start bouncing. >
  
  Fire good! Me cook with fire. Stay warm. >
  
  The international equivalent of saying "what are you gonna do? Stab me?" >
  
  That’s the definition of what Israel did, playing with fire. >
  
  Israel be like "nah we're gonna play with drones* >
  
  Remember the threads with everyone piling on Israel for "doing nothing to help Ukraine"?
  I remember. >
  
  And whereas in reality, Israel has voted to condemn the russian invasion of Ukraine in the UN every time it has come up for a vote, Israel has given large amounts of humanitarian aid to Ukraine including setting up a field hospital in Ukraine, Israel has taken in a large amount of ukrainian war refugees, and Israel has given Ukraine some military equipment to defend themselves such as helmets and kevlar jackets. >
  
  That's a weak response from Iran, what a bunch of weakling politicians. >
  
  As opposed to what, attacking Israel and escalating to a full blown war? Not sure why everyone here wants to see people kill each other so much. Iran showing restraint, whether because of their weak position or some unfounded sense of honor, is good for the civilians of both nations who would be the ones to massively suffer should Iran and Israel go to war. >
  
  As opposed to declaring Israel is a legitimate country and making peace with it.
  Then dropping the nuclear program until further notice and start helping your own citizens instead of torturing and murdering them for wanting to not wear a stupid head scarf. >
  
  
  for wanting to not wear a stupid head scarf.
  
  Different cultures have different values. Western values arent compatible everywhere >
  
  No. That is some woke bullshit.
  The Iranian government is torturing and executing women who want nothing but to live in peace. Stop with the fake tolerance. >
  
  Umm too late >
  
  Next Iran will be threatening the infidels with “ The Mother in Law of all battles” >
  
  West sends NLAWs anti tank weapons to Ukraine. Iran sends its In-laws instead. >
  
  Clever!! Very punny lol >
  
  Israel : And Iam Gasoline, Bitch >
  
  Israel warns Iran not to 'play with fire' after drone deliveries to Russia. >
  
  Drones have been made in Russia for months >
  
  Even if that were true, and it isn’t, why would that make Iran any less culpable? I know someone who defends Iran and or Russia has the education of a 7 year old, but surely you can see that your statement is completely nonsensical? >
  
  Iran is the one playing with fire by supporting Russia. Iran got burned. I don't Israel needed any real convincing on their part. >
  
  Israel could likely murderfuck Iran & Russia at the same time in a conventional war if they really wanted to. >
  
  With what? Nukes? Don't you think Russia has enough nukes to turn Israel into glass? >
  
  So?  Israel has enough to turn Moscow into glass as well.
  Israel is actually capable of non-nuclear decapitation strikes as well & has 0 qualms about assassination. >
  
  And what? Both annihilated that's how you win a war? Russia has plenty of missiles too and Israel is tiny, much easier to destroy in a conventional missiles war and Putin has plenty of experience in assassinations too.
  It's laughable for you to think that Israel can take Russia alone in a conventional war. Both can sit around and launching missiles at each other for years. >
  
  LOL.  As if.
  The reality of Russia's incompetence & failure is clearly showing us, size doesn't matter.
  You can stay mad at reality or you can cope. >
  
  He's not the one avoiding reality. That would be you. I'm not even going to get into it with you other than saying that. If you're really curious why you're wrong, you can check my comment history, explaining to the Reddit echo chamber that nuclear war remains a threat. If not, that's fine too.
  Try to explain to a redditor why nukes still matter when speaking of Russia, and this is their default response. "They couldn't if they wanted to. Their stuff is rusted out from 1970. The US and Ukraine will shoot it down. They are too scared. Nobody would follow orders. Russian missles aren't any good".
  They have no data to support this, but they read it, or heard it, or simply just want to believe it. Either way, it's you coping, not the other way around. I hope Russia collapses tomorrow and everything Putin stands for. I hope Ukraine is provided what they need despite any and all threats. It doesn't mean I don't recognize the threat Russian nukes pose, struggles in Ukraine aside. 
  Here's the facts. Do your own research on it, but if you're going to tell me I'm wrong, I suggest do it with data and evidence.
  US arsenal - as of 2021 only land based ICBM is the LGM 30G minuteman, latest variant designed 1970s. Trident II is the SLBM used by Ohio class SSBN, latest variant 1990s.
  Russian arsenal - a shit load of old soviet Topol and Sarmat I is a bulk of it. However, they have deployed more than sufficient numbers of Yars, Bulava, and as of 2022 limited Sarmat II deployment. These aren't prototypes or stupid "wonder weapons". They are tested, deployed in active service. These are all built after 2004. The US hasn't designed a new missle in 30 years.
  It doesn't matter though. The US really doesn't need to build a new design, though they will be doing so late this decade reportedly. Russia has no ABM defense of note so those old missles do jussssst fine should it come to that. Russia on the other hand felt compelled to build new designs because of the American ABM system. They built the intermediate range stuff because they know they can't hang conventionally with NATO, so the threat of nukes IS their strategy. I'm glad the US is moving forward assisting Ukraine, but they are treading lightly and so is Europe because the threat isn't a fat zero like you'd like to believe.
  In a strictly nuclear war, Russia is quite capable. They test their gear, the west test their gear. Nobody's ever used it on one another, so testing is all we got and their weapons have been tested and deployed. Is their old shit poorly maintained, yes. Has some stuff gone missing, certainly. Do they also have new weapons and a capable missle/space program, yes.
  I'm rooting for Ukraine, but that doesn't mean I'm going to cherry pick the scenario, or "cope" as you told the other redditor >
  
  Dear Iran,
  Shove the fire up your ass.
  Sincerely,
  The Entire Planet >
  
  Russia and Iran are all talk >
  
  Russias not all talk, they do enough action, they just oversell themselves. >
  
  So, mostly talk. >
  
  Their mouth writes checks that they can’t cash, but the world would be better if it was just talk and no action. >
  
  These were rockets they were playing with, not fire. >
  
  r/ChinaWarns Iranian edition. >
  
  Day late and a drone short. >
  
  Haaaah.  That’s even weaker than Russia’s interminable threats against helping Ukraine. >
  
  Israel and Germany tell Iran and Russian to go put their heads in the sand. We all know who will win >
  
  I think something being overlooked here is how capable the iranian government is of causing a massive humanitarian problem for neighbouring countries along with the mass exportation of terrorism across europe that turkey is currently doing against Greece and the EU. >
  
  What are they gonna do? Build drones? >
  
  I'm getting the impression that the west is coming to the conclusion that all these dictatorships are paper tigers 
  Like, we thought that before, but with Russia's performance in Ukraine we're going from 75% confidence to 99% >
  
  Basic Human Nature, let someone do what they want to and they’ll WILL somehow get it done. No one can get their full potential otherwise, even on a dictator’s gunpoint.
  Willpower is way way more important than we give it credit for lol, as someone with ADHD I can fkn attest that. >
  
  I’m certain that these harsh words have Mossad shaking in their boots. >
  
  Iran should stop trying to talk tough. Isreal can more than handle them >
  
  I’d give Iran a week at most before falling to a Israel/U.S. collation. I wouldn’t saber rattle to much if I was Iran. >
  
  I dont think you understand how wargames work. The point is to find weaknesses in your own forces by putting them in deliberately disadvantageous positions.
  Iranian bike messengers could literally teleport according to the rules in the first round of games. After that one, they reset with more realistic constraints. >
  
  Lot's of arm chair Kissinger's on this thread. This is obviously a provocative move by a very conservative theocratic administration in an extremely volatile region. I know we all like to bag on Iran, but there is certainly potential for things to escalate in a rapid, unpredictable and dangerous way. We're all humans living on our one planet. Peace in the Middle East. One love. >
  
  There's no end to this conflict. It'll go on for generations, and has been basically on-going in this region since Jesus-times, if not before that (historians who actually know history, feel free to chime in.) >
  
  Iran and their “You better nots…” lol. They’re always playing the fuck around and find out game like no one’s watching. >
  
  Translation; we can't counterattack, so here's an empty threat >
  
  Israel would send the terrorist Imams back to the stone age. 
  Iran better watch their asses. >
  
  Play with 🔥 >
  
  That's too funny. A regime that's on the brink of collapse is making threats... hmmm, what other countries are in this category? >
  
  At least someone is trying to do something to stop Iran from exporting even more weapons >
  
  Counterpoint; Isreal should play with even more fire, preferably in the location of Iran. >
  
  This was just a little “probing” before the decisive strike to take out Iran’s nuclear capabilities. >
  
  Literally Israel: playing in the fire. 
  Iran (the fire): better not do that. >
  
  Maybe this is Israel plan to help Ukraine with the drone issue. If Iran sends the drones to Israel now. Man anyways Iran and Israel relationship is so weird. >
  
  Well, Israel is worried too about the drones, because for now, Israel doesn't have anything "strong enough" to destroy 1000 drones all at once if Iran send them.. 
  I'm pretty sure Israel destroyed a hyper sonic missiles factory too that was worrying the US, Israel and a few more Arabic countries.. 
  It is helping Ukraine too.. A win win I guess.. 
  This is speculative, but maybe the us and Israel are planning to destroy Iran nuclear facilities very soon, so the less drones Iran has now the better? - only time will tell. >
  
  Yeah I’m sure Israel is real scared. >
  
  Begun, the Drone Wars have. >
  
  It's not like we can't attack them, we just don't have permission yet. >
  
  They already did. Now what are you going to do? Invade them? >
  
  I don't see why the perpetrators wouldn't do it again. Seems to me like there's no consequences, just words >
  
  They are so secretive over there that even if we think we know what happened, most likely it didn’t. >
  
  I think Iran is officially warning everyone who might have done it.  They also warned the US.  I wonder if they’ve gotten around to Azerbaijan yet… >
  
  If Israel does it again, they’ll strongly consider developing air defense systems! >
  
  That's Irans way of saying "Please stop setting us on fire" >
  
  Iran seems to be warning an awful lot of people >
  
  Empty threat as they can’t afford to wage war >
  
  They played with fire at your military factory bittttcchhhhh >
  
  oops i did it again >
  
  Put Iran government on a dog barking competition and u make bank..the only thing they are good at is killing their own "unarmed" people. Why i emphasize on unarmed? Because in parts of the country where locals are armed ,IRGC casualities are so high they resorted to use artilleries,tanks and war helicopters against the people lol . >
  
  What about playing with napalm. >
  
  Amazing they have any ranking officials left >
  
  Yeah… I’ve seen this one before… >
  
  🤣 lord hold me >
  
  They literally just did >
  
  The sequel to the story is Iran gets boo boo from sharp toy, and goes home to his mommy. >
  
  This is like telling a cat not to be a dick. 
  All I can say is good luck with that >
  
  You know, as much as the west likes to pretend Iran is some kind of existential threat to world peace, this reaction is all you really need to know to see it isn't true. Israel, quite calmly and openly just attacked multiple sites in their country, and Iran has no response but to make some vague threats about possible reprisals.
  The only reason the US and Israel feel confident about attacking Iran like this is because they know Iran can't respond. Iran has been sanctioned, military sites attacked, scientists killed, and they've had virtually no response for decades because they just don't have any ability to hurt Israel or the United States.
  It's similar to why the United States invalidated their own argument by invading Iraq in 2003, despite claiming they had weapons of mass destruction. If a country actually had a nuclear deterrent, they wouldn't get invaded. You only attack countries that you know can't respond in any meaningful way.
  Either way, despite the cheering going on here, it's never a good thing to see more countries being drawn into war and more people being killed. >
  
  
  it's never a good thing to see more countries being drawn into war and more people being killed.
  
  Not disagreeing with you, but worth noting that the facility produces Shahed-136 drones which are being used for murder of civilians in Ukraine; Iran may refuse to acknowledge their use there, and we all know it's bullshit given the massive amount of evidence to the contrary.
  Again, inciting war is bad, but I wouldn't give Iran a free pass for actively arming an aggressor in an ongoing invasion. Also wouldn't give them a free pass for mass oppression and suppression of protest through legally-sanctioned murder, though that's a separate topic. >
  
  Selling arms isn't a legitimate casus belli especially as neither the US or Israel are at war with Russia.
  The West is morally superior and can therefore invade or attack sovereign nations with impunity. That's what most people unironically believe >
  
  
  The West is morally superior and can therefore invade or attack sovereign nations with impunity.
  
  No, I think the side defending against a war of aggression is morally superior, and therefore that selling weapons to the party invading someone else is morally inferior. When that invading party is western, yeah - that's reprehensible. In this case, it's not, and that makes Iran's drone sales to Russia morally suspect (doubly so, given widespread knowledge of Russians targeting civilian buildings and infrastructure using precisely said drones).
  I never said that selling weapons is itself a legitimate casus belli. But I'm not going to lose sleep over weapons factories being struck if said weapons factories are feeding directly to terrorist strikes against civilians as part of an invasion. >
  
  Would you then support Iran if it bombed a missile factory in Ohio that was arming the Sauds in their attacks on Yemen? >
  
  Yea sure thing. Not like Russia, Iran, China, North Korea don't say that shit daily. 
  America's tanks will burn and all that Yada Yada Yada. Gets so tiring when 4 countries have like the same 2 threats >
  
  what is iran gonna do? lmao >
  
  Our God is mightier than your God. Kaboom. We all die over fictional characters. >
  
  They both believe in the same God, educate yourself. >
  
  Do they believe that? or like what >
  
  'Iran says no plausible means of retaliation' >
  
  Did they think the Israelis were playing? >
  
  Iran needs to stop playing with fire with their own civilians >
  
  Russia, North Korea, Iran.
  If they were a product, there'd be five stacked stickers that kept reducing it in price. >
  
  Israel would wipe Iran off the face of the planet if they ever engaged in full conflict >
  
  US-Israel attack and explode nuclear infrastructure via Stuxnet-- Iran: I warn you not to do that again or else! 
  Israel assassinates 4 top iranian nuclear scientists-- Iran:  I warn you not to do that again or else! 
  US fries top IRGC General Soleimani-- Iran: I warn you not to do that again or else! 
  Israel pummels Iran in drone attacks-- Iran: I warn you not to do that again or else! 
  Iranian people dance in the street and take off headscarves-- Iran: mass imprisonments and executions via kangaroo courts!!  
  These pussies only have balls to fuck with their own people. >
  
  After the Iraqi-Iranian war, they know how catastrophic it is to be in a war. They won't start one easily. >
  
  Like how they partake in proxy wars in Yemen and Syria? Or how they send forces to Kurdish strongholds to smother them?  Yes they are weary of the catastrophic effects of war -- only when the catastrophe is aimed at their heads. >
  
  The war in Syria was against ISIS, not a bad thing. I do not know about the other examples you mentioned. I don't trust the news. >
  
  Is anyone else sick of the Middle East's bullshit? >
  
  Sounds like Genghis Khan and the Mongols need to come back to life and get back to work on the Khwarizmi Empire (which roughly corresponded to the area of modern-day Iran) >
  
  the khwarizmids were pretty important in kicking the crusaders out of Jerusalem the last time so... >
  
  Yeah, Iran, who's gonna' help your woman murdering asses?
  ruZZia?
  LOLZ.
  FAFO. >
  
  yeah, the guy bleeding from a broken nose sure is threatening the guy who broke his nose. >
  
  Another bunch of threatening idiots. Just like Putin. >
  
  It's funny how Israel is allowed and encouraged to attack other sovereign countries, but everyone is up in arms over Russia attacking Ukraine. Double standards much? >
  
  D'awww, someone's upset that Iran can't fund terrorist attacks against Jews, and openly call for the annihilation of them, without consequences :( >
  
  Nah, just upset that everyone is brainwashed into thinking the US and it's allies can do no wrong, Even when they're invading or attacking sovereign countries. Have a nice day! >
  
  "Wahhhh! Why sniff can't Iran sniff propagate terrorism and advocate genocide against sniff Jews without consequences?! Wahhhhh!!!!!" >
  
  You should look up what genocide means. And then look up how Israel was founded buddy, there were people living on that land before. Kinda like how America genocided the native Americans. 
  Also leave out the wahhs and the sniffs, that shit is just weird. You can make your argument like an adult, you know. >
  
  "Wahhh! If I sniff point to a sniff fictional genocide, I can pretend sniff Israel was wrong to attack Iran!!!! Wahhhhh!!!!!" >
  
  Are you trying to "own" him with your pathetic quips? Cute. >
  
  If Iran is fire than Israel is nuclear fusion >
  
  Israel would dominate Iran, end of story. >
  
  Iran is like a barking dog that doesn't do anything >
  
  A barking dog that’s actively trying to bite off one of its own legs for being too secular >
  
  It's odd how two years ago I would have been outraged at Israel here.  Gone on about how "state-sponsored terrorism" seems to be just fine as long as the target is a country we don't like, and about how we should be trying to draw Iran into the international community instead of ostracize and push it farther away...
  Now, after Mahsa Amini.... fuck them. >
  
  After reading the article… I can’t remember the last time the US was going around the world and challenging pretty much all advisories to do something or shut the fuck up like they are now. 
  The U.S. in the last few months has pretty much shown up Russia, China, and Iran and all just kind of stood there. >
  
  Hehe I totally agree one should not play with fire it causes lots of damage. We can see all the damage in ruzzia from all the smoking Ivsn is doing. Looks like he has taken a vaccation in Iran for a while. >
  
  Seems like once in a generation chance to take out a nuclear threat. Everyone including the Iranian people wants its regime gone.
  Countries like Israel can attack without much consequence. Iranian government made the biggest mistake to rear its ugly head from the trench to help Russia, headscarves or not. >
  
  The world would be better off without the two countries. >
  
  Obviously, Pegasus by NSO Group was conveniently left out.
  Also, the U.S. government can do a lot of good things for the U.S. citizens with $38bn which Israel gets for free. >
  
  Because Israel is always righteous and would never do no wrong. This is what I've gotten so far for the past 2 weeks. >
  
  If you get attacked deliberately by a neighboring country, and you’re response isn’t to immediately declare war, then you either can’t fight back, or don’t have the will to fight back. >
  
  Well, it's not a neighboring country. They'd have to go through someone else to actually invade.