comment: >
  
  It should, but it hasn't yet.
context: I personally really like the idea of him going 3rd party. >
  
  I support you on this. Trump please go third party and show the Dems that you own them, the GQP, and Hunter Biden! /s
  We need to start posting flyers all over. You can prove your loyalty to Putin again … I mean Canada 🇨🇦 that they will rally all of their trucks with you.
  Trump for the “Trump Patriotic American-Continental God United Party of the Christ Southern Baptist of New QAnon ProTIFA Republic”.
  /s >
  
  What does /s mean at the end of a sentence? I’m embarrassed that I don’t know. >
  
  It means the comment is sarcasm >
  
  Thank you so much! It’s been driving me crazy, but now makes total sense. >
  
  Don’t worry, happened to me too. I was ranting against someone not knowing it was sarcasm! >
  
  Another user taught me a few formatting tricks such as italics, bold, and strikethrough. I’ll get it all down sooner or later. Btw, do these only apply to Reddit or across all uses of a keyboard in different platforms? >
  
  I’ve only seen in Reddit. I stopped using FB awhile ago and twitter, never haha. You’ll be fine! Good u asked 🫡 >
  
  Thanks again! >
  
  Nice to see republicans making statements like this... Unfortunately, they're just statements. We need to see a real and tangible legal result as an outcome to the Jan 6 committee's hard work. >
  
  In the past, it would have disqualified him per "gentleman's agreement." But that's never been how Trump does things. Even as child, he didn't give a flip about rules, neither at home or at school. 
  If you don't stop him from doing it, then it's not really a rule from his point of view. Like him still using the presidential seal on his clothes, golf courses, towels, and lecterns after he left the White House.
  Even if they barred him from running, he'd still be out there holding rallies and telling everyone he's running for reelection. >
  
  Trump is sitting on Republican campaign funds he controls. If he uses it on a third party run that would be something. >
  
  Right now he's dangling it as a threat since they're backing off of supporting him. >
  
  Hutchinson wants to run himself, so he's trying to stick it to a rival here. Really there's no body which has the power to disqualify him except the courts. He'd have to actually be convicted of something first for that to happen. >
  
  
  Really there's no body which has the power to disqualify him except the courts.
  
  This is the real issue with disqualifying Trump. Who has standing and what court would have jurisdiction?  MTG had a state hearing on whether or not she was disqualified. Would each state have to decide? Could he be disqualified in only certain states?  Anyone know how that would work? >
  
  He wouldn't be on the ballot in those states. Presumably write-ins would still be counted, but that may be challenging for his more illiterate supporters. >
  
  Lol and Republicans in Congress had 2 opportunities to actually bar Trump from office but REFUSED to do so. 
  Fuck the Republican Party, they deserve what they’ve sown. >
  
  Note to Republicans:  show me, don't tell me. >
  
  You know, I kind of agree, but the pragmatic side of me says "let him run." He's not a viable candidate anymore. I don't care if he runs for the GOP or as an independent; if he runs in the next election cycle, it's a win for the Democrats. 
  I would prefer it if in the meantime we could just start court proceedings for his many legal 'issues', that would be nice >
  
  Good! 
  Unfortunately though I don’t think it’s gonna stop him, or his followers, from thinking he deserves the presidency. >
  
  It’s not like Democrats keep voting for Trump. Republicans need to fix their own problem. >
  
  And just like that, Trump will make a social media post and this guy's family will have their lives threatened. >
  
  Should disqualify him from a LOT more than that.