comment: >
  
  Don’t limit yourself.  There are at least four justices that wish to subvert the Constitution (Thomas and Alito chief among them, but alternately with Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in tow).  Just their arguments regarding the ridiculous Independent State Legislature nonsense is proof of that.  Anyone with even a fifth grade understanding of the Constitution knows that the framers were extra careful to ensure there were checks and balances.  That stupid theory would have a misreading of a Federal Constitution clause override even explicit clauses in state constitutions that allow for judicial review of redistricting decisions.  And yet, there were several justices who’ve already expressed support for it.  So much for the originalist or “state’s rights” beliefs.
  All they care about is political power, and the checks and balances of democracy are inconvenient for their theocratic purposes.
context: The reason to worry that the Supreme Court won’t “survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts.” Is because, in the current Supreme Court, the Constitution and its reading are just political acts. Not to mention that one of the current justices is a seditionist.