comment: >
  
  So what you're telling me is that oil and coal companies should rebrand themselves are environmental startups...
context: "Some potential investors and customers who have reviewed the company’s proposals say that it’s not a serious scientific effort or a credible business but more of an attention grab designed to stir up controversy in the field." >
  
  There it is. >
  
  This smells like an ill-informed PR stunt >
  
  
  This company did not get government approval
  They are planning to make money off of this
  Scientists have condemned their plans
  The CEO of the company has stated “We joke slash not joke that this is partly a company and partly a cult,” >
  
  It's also a scam. They aren't doing anything. Just a PR stunt. >
  
  Well technically they are in fact releasing certain particles in the air that tweak the climate. That is what breathing does.
  No proof that whatever else they are doing is any more impactful though. >
  
  Earth: Fuck around with the atmosphere and find out… >
  
  I'm all for stopping climate change. But haven't we learned it's well beyond our ability and maybe we should just stop fucking with it and let it heal itself. I don't want my kids to raise thier kids in unbearable heat or on a giant snowball because we fucked up fixing climate change >
  
  Well yes, but our efforts did help billionaires become bigger billionaires and buy a fifth yacht. That is most important. >
  
  Yup and simply stoping putting shit into the atmosphere doesn't make anyone money so it is fought against tooth and nail.