comment: >
  
  Because the government isn't imposing the cost of guns on people.  Guns just cost what they cost and if a new company comes out with a cheaper gun for poor people (high point cough) that is fine.  Or people can make their own guns, which some do for fairly cheap.  There is a huge difference between something having a natural cost just by the nature of being in demand and having an artificial cost imposed by a government.
context: Using that logic - and I'm not saying it's bad mind you - why isn't the fact that guns need to be purchased and maintained in the first place a infringement of your 2nd amendment rights? 
  You could argue it's similar to a poll tax and it's certainly an expense that disproportionately affects the poor.