comment: >
  
  Oh cool, its democrats fault Roe got overturned.  
  God you guys are so tiring with this nonsense.
context: This is like performing a house inspection without mentioning the house has burned down. Willful ignorance. >
  
  "well, the security system needs upgrading to protect the glowing embers of the house" - Roberts, probably >
  
  What an absurdly ineffectual prick. >
  
  His biggest takeaway was that he wants more protection for judges, to ensure they are yet further removed from public sentiment while they unconstitutionally legislate via judicial fiat. >
  
  Except that Roe v. Wade itself was "legislat[ion] via judicial fiat" rather than law created by the legislative process and Congress.
  Any leaders in red states trying to eliminate abortion entirely (without even any medical, viability, or rape exemptions) are in the wrong, but even many Democrats knew the justification in Roe was shaky and that abortion protections should have been passed by Congress. They were just too happy to keep campaigning on that 3rd rail issue without actually needing to do anything about it while in office.