comment: >
  
  Dem and few moderate gop left in the house can put forth bills together and threatened to oust him if he doesn't bring the bills to a vote.
context: McCarthy gave Boobert what she asked for. "Just as the Speaker is elected by the whole body, we will restore the ability for any 5 members of the majority party to initiate a vote to remove the Speaker if so warranted," he wrote in a letter to his Republican colleagues on Sunday.
  This is going to be interesting. >
  
  The fact that this will probably backfire horribly on McCarthy should he become the Speaker pleases me. >
  
  In the battle for the soul of the party, the domestic terrorists have won.
  Now they are seizing the power to go along with their moribund philosophical victory.
  It doesn't help that McCarthy is a spineless blowhard more interested in acquiring a new job title than amassing power. He's ensured that he'll be nothing more than a paper tiger, a puppet for whoever manages to actually come out on top within the House of Representatives.
  Agreeing to a concession that allows the caucus to remove him is effectively castration. He is a political eunuch, impotent without someone else to do the real work for him. >
  
  So, as always, it falls to democrats to get real work done. >
  
  It would, except the House gives the minority party much less power than they could expect in the Senate. The majority party in the House basically has complete control of the agenda, as well as the chair for virtually every committee.