comment: >
  
  Is George Santos even his real name?
context: Now he can collect a government paycheck while doing nothing. >
  
  I dunno, better that than collecting a government paycheck to fuck us all over in those committees. 
  I'd still rather not he get paid at all from our taxes, but you know. Progress. Baby steps. >
  
  Yeah he would do nothing but harm if he actually did anything >
  
  It's been a scam the whole time to get that sweet sweet congressional retirement pay. >
  
  If he somehow gets kicked from the House they need to figure out how to not give him that. I will be very disappointed with my tax $ paying him the rest of his life >
  
  He would have had to serve 5 year’s minimum I believe to be eligible. >
  
  I'd like him to serve 5 years minimum elsewhere >
  
  
  Santos called himself a “distraction.”
  
  As if House Republicans have a coherent agenda. >
  
  Now step down from Congress. >
  
  He's hoping to fly under the radar long enough to survive the scandal. Don't fall for it. >
  
  I don't think he can clear the background hurdles in order to have access to confidential information for those assignments. >
  
  Well, it’s inappropriate for the king to serve on a House committee. >
  
  King? I thought Santos was a Queen? >
  
  Why not both? >
  
  All hail the King of Queens >
  
  As somebody who is very pro UBI and whatnot, I kinda don't hate that side of the grift that he's pulling. I do hate the lying to his constituents and damage he could have done policy wise.