comment: >
  
  At the same time!!!
context: It seems a legitimate question to ask if George Santos really exists. Brazil is a favorite gateway for Russian to get it's agents into the US. >
  
  I expect that when the heat gets turned up, he'll do a disappearing act. >
  
  Possibly out of a high window. >
  
  Let me offer you this fine tea. >
  
  Oh, it's a bit tangy. What is that? Lemmon? >
  
  Polonilemon. >
  
  Hey! Is this radioactive? >
  
  So far every single thing about him or his campaign has been a lie. I don't even believe he needs glasses and is wearing a fake pair for show. >
  
  It's so he can do a makeover montage just before the next election wherein he removes his glasses and lets his hair down >
  
  Uggh! Janie Santos?? But she has paint on her overalls! >
  
  Heavily underrated comment >
  
  It's almost like the GOP is corrupt or something.... >
  
  When asked for comment Speaker McCarthy ran away with his fingers in his ears yelling "LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALALA!". >
  
  What an impotent, sad excuse for a "leader", or human being for that matter.
  I feel like somehow the Republican party has lost their moral compass all the way up their collective asses. >
  
  What will mccarthy say next, probably something like "well now we won't remove george until he's actually convicted and then sentenced." >
  
  Then "nothing in the Constitution says being in jail excludes him". >
  
  He is the test by the far right/Russian conglomerate to see if he survives, if so then game on >
  
  The games been on, George is just another attack on our Democracy >
  
  Right? I'm sure he's not the only one to have been funneled dark money through their 2022 campaign. The question is does everyone (voters, media, FEC, justice dept) focus on Santos only and that's the end of it, or does it shed light on other dubious campaign donations? The way the GOP is rather split on "Santos should resign" vs "He was duly elected" makes me feel like latter group is hoping the heat lets up soon. >
  
  It was already known that the NRA took in Russian money and so did Facebook and yet no one is being held accountable for that. Trump was probably the test run with how much Russian and foreign money he could take and Santos is the next step. There will probably be more and Citizens United proved that we aren’t really a Democracy and that anyone can buy a politician or election. >
  
  Cold hard cash rules the world.
  There's no political problem that money won't disappear for you.
  And should it return, just throw more $$$.
  This is hardly new and is global.
  The real golden rule is ' Those that have the gold, get to make the rules '.
  And the rules don't say anything about sharing the gold.
  As Cyndi Lauper famously sang,
  " Ah, but everybody's only looking out for themselves
  And you say, well, who can you trust
  I'll tell you, it's just nobody else's money
  Money changes everything
  I said money, money changes everything
  Ya think ya know what ya doin'
  We don't hold the strings
  It's all in the past now
  Money changes everything ! " >
  
  CREAM
  Cash Rules Everything Around Me >
  
  There's a simple explanation, all his donors were killed in the Holocaust and the twin towers on 911.