comment: >
context: We need a stand alone bill to spearhead nuclear. This is actually something that could be bipartisan. Although the coal and gas lobby will probably be against it. The IRA provides some money to maintain current nuclear plants but not enough for private companies to commit to 20-30 year projects with high risk. >
  
  I actually have become pro nuclear, becasue the reactors these days are way safer, because they have a new way of generating energy, without any or with way less nuclear waste. >
  
  Fission power has not future due to the dangerous byproducts which are deadly longer than the industry society needed to store them has existed.
  Solar and wind with battery backup, even NG as backup, can everything that is needed. 100 square miles of solar panels can power the US.  Lots of roof tops.