comment: >
  
  Nice.
context: is this number 666? >
  
  Nein >
  
  The article notes how perilous a nine vote majority is in the House. Honestly, with the nutter brigade running things, I doubt they'll be able to coalition around anything resembling actionable governance (which is probably good news). >
  
  That's been true for 30 years. Republicans are all propaganda zero ethics or morality.
  We have the WWE for politics and we all have to suffer for it. I just hope we all survive it. >
  
  Thankfully, by only controlling the House, WWE kayfabe is all that it'll amount to until '24. It'll certainly be groan inducing to watch Gym Jordan shriek about a laptop for two years, but it won't amount to anything other than being tiresome. For now, at least. >
  
  In WWE language, it will get heat... but it won't be heat from engaged viewers. It's "go away heat" (which is not desirable). >
  
  
  Democrats control the White House and the Senate, and now Republicans control the House. But winning just nine more seats than Democrats means that the Republican caucus has very little room for error. If more than four representatives defect, it won’t have enough votes to pass bills with a majority vote.
  
  Are there more than four Republicans in the house whose grasp on power is so tenuous that they'll be forced to ignore the crazy if they want to get reelected? >
  
  I hope so, but the congressmen you've heard of are the loudest and most extreme. the ones likely to defect are the ones who never get in the news. >
  
  "One of the most important numbers coming out of 2022 is nine. That’s the difference between the number of seats Republicans won in the U.S. House of Representatives in November and the number of seats Democrats won." >
  
  Feel like they're gonna try one more massive push for 1488, given how they've been behaving. >
  
  69 is the number.   
  They will eat each other up.  
  Look for the congressman with a very flat horseshoe shaped face.  
  He was the one paired with MTG.