comment: >
  
  I mean, of all the lies he's told, if he has indeed lied about needing glasses I care the absolute least about that.
context: McCarthy: we want the vote, so we don't care if he murdered his mother and tortured puppies. >
  
  
  tortured puppies.
  
  Literally that Oz dude. >
  
  Adebesi? >
  
  You could literally make up any sort about this guy and I'd believe it.
  'Prosecutors reveal that George Santos raised money for campaign by selling human body parts.' >
  
  He certainly sold his soul a long time ago. >
  
  True. I agree, upvote! >
  
  At this point I'd have to see a prescription for those glasses to believe they're anything but a prop. >
  
  *Looks at picture.
  They, ummm, don't appear to be distorting anything... Minor prescription at best, but I mean, I'm all aboard the prop glasses conspiracy train. >
  
  Meh, could just be the angle.  
  Even if they are non-prescription glasses, so what? If he likes them for the look, then oh well.  
  I recognize that for some people this is unacceptable; it's akin to lying about able-ism but in a way to take advantage of certain positive associated stereotypes, but to me it sits in the grey on this issue. I would feel much more strongly about him using fake hearing aids for example. But then, that's my opinion on this one. I personally think that eyeglasses have pushed far enough into the mainstream of fashion that it can just be seen as a fashion choice.