comment: >
context: The reason to worry that the Supreme Court won’t “survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts.” Is because, in the current Supreme Court, the Constitution and its reading are just political acts. Not to mention that one of the current justices is a seditionist. >
  
  Don’t limit yourself.  There are at least four justices that wish to subvert the Constitution (Thomas and Alito chief among them, but alternately with Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in tow).  Just their arguments regarding the ridiculous Independent State Legislature nonsense is proof of that.  Anyone with even a fifth grade understanding of the Constitution knows that the framers were extra careful to ensure there were checks and balances.  That stupid theory would have a misreading of a Federal Constitution clause override even explicit clauses in state constitutions that allow for judicial review of redistricting decisions.  And yet, there were several justices who’ve already expressed support for it.  So much for the originalist or “state’s rights” beliefs.
  All they care about is political power, and the checks and balances of democracy are inconvenient for their theocratic purposes. >
  
  Juan Williams, the guy who put a target on NPR by double dipping with Fox News. I’d be chill with never seeing his name on my screen again. >
  
  Six conservatives on the court advanced a right-wing political agenda by uprooting nearly 50 years of settled law and ending every American woman’s constitutional right to abortion. >
  
  There are 3 kinds of justices in today's world. The first upholds the law and the constitution, could be nominated by either party. The second is beholden to the federalist society and their agenda,  willing to go to any length for their agenda. Then we have the 3rd type that are just crooked, selling out for a dollar or just bad in general, see type 2.
  It was mentioned that SCOTUS judges tax returns could be released, it absolutely should be so. With every penny and "gift" we'll documented. No rules on ethics ,not surprisingly, leads to no ethics. >
  
  Second type is definitely the most troubling. >
  
  Several rulings on religion and race — culture war hot buttons — are due in 2023. >
  
  The right wing SCOTUS justices want trust until they lose it but then they are perfectly willing to use raw power, whether we citizens approve or not. >
  
  Their plans to distort, corrupt and ignore the Constitution will pick up speed as the Manchin led, Democrats for Fascism caucus continues to prevent reform/expansion of SCOTUS. >
  
  Yeah. A bunch of political hacks waiting for handover >
  
  I think it's time for a change.