comment: >
  
  Rewriting history. Our government is now embracing fascism, criminality, and corruption. The veil has fallen.
context: This is like performing a house inspection without mentioning the house has burned down. Willful ignorance. >
  
  "well, the security system needs upgrading to protect the glowing embers of the house" - Roberts, probably >
  
  What an absurdly ineffectual prick. >
  
  His biggest takeaway was that he wants more protection for judges, to ensure they are yet further removed from public sentiment while they unconstitutionally legislate via judicial fiat. >
  
  Except that Roe v. Wade itself was "legislat[ion] via judicial fiat" rather than law created by the legislative process and Congress.
  Any leaders in red states trying to eliminate abortion entirely (without even any medical, viability, or rape exemptions) are in the wrong, but even many Democrats knew the justification in Roe was shaky and that abortion protections should have been passed by Congress. They were just too happy to keep campaigning on that 3rd rail issue without actually needing to do anything about it while in office. >
  
  Oh cool, its democrats fault Roe got overturned.  
  God you guys are so tiring with this nonsense. >
  
  That's not even what I said, but do continue with your superiority complex.
  What I did say was that Roe was legislation from the bench, which you all are supposedly against, but really only when you don't like the decisions made. What I did say was that even Democrats like Justice Ginsburg knew it wasn't the best way to have abortion protections.
  I didn't ever say "it's Democrats' fault!" but it was also obvious Republicans weren't going to go against their religious base to publicly push for abortion protection. >
  
  
  Roe was legislation from the bench
  
  What did they legislate, exactly? Mandatory abortions? Mandatory pregnancies? >
  
  What happened to all the moderates who said Roberts keeps the court balanced? Did they shove their heads up their asses again? >
  
  Any moderate has been kicked to the curb. There's only far right hardliners left. They all took the red pill. >
  
  ~~This is a bunch of bullshit and akin to “both sides are bad.”~~
  Edit: My reading skills suck. >
  
  Did you miss the moderate Republican part? Republicans have no both sides they're all on the crazy side. >
  
  Yep, totally misread it. >
  
  My writing skills are worse lol. Happy New Year! >
  
  
  The legislation allows judges to shield on the internet  certain personal information about themselves and their families
  
  but if the plebs want any modicum of privacy, fuck them, right? seems totally fair >
  
  
  It has an exception for media reporting, but some transparency groups have worried that broad interpretation of the law could inhibit watchdog efforts...."
  
  The loophole is a feature not a bug.
  Warren's Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Act bill, S.5315 would go a long way in fixing some of the issues. >
  
  We would like to talk about Clarence and Ginni, John >
  
  File all complaints to the Supreme Court ethics committee, and they will assist you in a timely manner >
  
  Lol I hope that was intentional I'm sure they have some manors >
  
  The Roberts court is a moral embarrassment. >
  
  They have no morals. Hardliners are never wrong. >
  
  In other news, Roberts is gleefully dismantling our democracy and ushering in a combination of late stage capitalism and theocracy. He is 100% agenda driven, and cares nothing about the law. >
  
  That’s why Rehnquist hired Roberts to head his anti civil rights think tank before Roberts had his current gig. >
  
  If Roberts cared about the Court and its legitimacy he'd resign.  Every day he shows up to work, he wears a uniform labeled "Worthless Hack". >
  
  This court needs to be held accountable for so many things, not least of shadow dockets. Unprecedented number of rulings falling outside normal channeles >
  
  Oh, come on! Justice Roberts worked, like, really hard on that Thurgood Marshall effigy. >
  
  So then stop with the shadow docket BS, already. >
  
  Zero mentions of his own investigation into the Roe leak. >
  
  Roberts is a coward as much as he is an illiberal trad-Catholic zealot. He’s a goddamn existential threat to our secular democracy. >
  
  Roberts is worried about the safety of the judiciary as the Supreme Court enables those in more than half of all states to carry guns without a license.  The man has no sense of irony.