comment: >
  
  Right? I'm sure he's not the only one to have been funneled dark money through their 2022 campaign. The question is does everyone (voters, media, FEC, justice dept) focus on Santos only and that's the end of it, or does it shed light on other dubious campaign donations? The way the GOP is rather split on "Santos should resign" vs "He was duly elected" makes me feel like latter group is hoping the heat lets up soon.
context: It seems a legitimate question to ask if George Santos really exists. Brazil is a favorite gateway for Russian to get it's agents into the US. >
  
  I expect that when the heat gets turned up, he'll do a disappearing act. >
  
  Possibly out of a high window. >
  
  Let me offer you this fine tea. >
  
  Oh, it's a bit tangy. What is that? Lemmon? >
  
  Polonilemon. >
  
  Hey! Is this radioactive? >
  
  So far every single thing about him or his campaign has been a lie. I don't even believe he needs glasses and is wearing a fake pair for show. >
  
  It's so he can do a makeover montage just before the next election wherein he removes his glasses and lets his hair down >
  
  Uggh! Janie Santos?? But she has paint on her overalls! >
  
  Heavily underrated comment >
  
  It's almost like the GOP is corrupt or something.... >
  
  When asked for comment Speaker McCarthy ran away with his fingers in his ears yelling "LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALALA!". >
  
  What an impotent, sad excuse for a "leader", or human being for that matter.
  I feel like somehow the Republican party has lost their moral compass all the way up their collective asses. >
  
  What will mccarthy say next, probably something like "well now we won't remove george until he's actually convicted and then sentenced." >
  
  Then "nothing in the Constitution says being in jail excludes him". >
  
  He is the test by the far right/Russian conglomerate to see if he survives, if so then game on >
  
  The games been on, George is just another attack on our Democracy