comment: >
  
  We leave it out bc that leads to uncomfortable truths about Manifest Destiny, and how religious zealotry has always played a large role in American imperialism in the Americas and the Pacific.
  Harsh truth is these domestic terrorists would have a lot in common with the frontiersmen that carried out the ethnic cleansing of the West, resettled the former Mexican states, and generally pressed our claims to the North American interior.
context: “…luring migrants into trailers to poison them with gas."
  So they’re just going full on Nazi at this point. >
  
  I'm not sure the future tense is proper there. >
  
  Which of those involved the future tense? >
  
  “Going” full Nazi. They’ve been there for a while. I would argue since the caravan nonsense about how they’re bringing disease, the kids in cages, and the forced hysterectomies of migrant women. >
  
  That's present progressive, not future. >
  
  Oh so we're going to be going grammar nazi now are we? >
  
  Actually, I think we're already there. >
  
  But when will then be now? >
  
  It's is now now.
  Source: I'm in the now not the then >
  
  TL;DR: Domestic terrorists talking to each other online about carrying out domestic terror attacks aimed at immigrants and infrastructure because, checks notes "immigrants bad". >
  
  I’m not sure why we leave out the “religious” part of these descriptions of domestic terrorists, or insurgents, we sure don’t when they’re Muslim. Exactly zero of these terrorists at home are atheists or agnostic, they’re all Christian extremists who use their “faith” as an excuse for their actions.