comment: >
  
  
  You don’t have to wait for everything to be complete
  
  I never said that. I said we should let the investigations finish. If they were to bring charges they would. I was trying to explain that we are actually in no position to know what they're investigating, let alone whether or not they're ready to file any charges.
context: Lock 'em up, SANCTION and DISBAR them! >
  
  Sounds like divisive malarkey, Jack. Why not give them another chance for the sake of unity and healing? /s >
  
  "Water under the bridge!" >
  
  "That's so boring!" >
  
  How about we start with actual criminal charges being filed against Trump and go from there. >
  
  How about we let the investigations finish. We just learned today that Mark Meadows was burning documents. I don't understand why people think they know enough about what's going on. Do you want him arrested, or do you want him prosecuted and found guilty? >
  
  That is not how it works. Every charge is separate. You don't have to wait for everything to be complete, you can charge him with what is know now and charge him with the rest later.
  Also there are multiple jurisdictions, different investigations and both state and federal charges..