comment: >
  
  Past, present, and future.
context: I like how his response was "yeah I lied but at least I'm not a criminal"....  which, given his credibility, means we're going to find out he is absolutely a criminal... >
  
  He is 100% a criminal in Brazil. >
  
  Of course. And Jesus Christ, defrauding the elderly of all things. Republicans are fucked if this is their best and brightest lol. 
  Right wingers would rather give their tax dollars to a literal fraud instead of trying to help people in need. 
  It’s really amazing to watch, over and over again. >
  
  Defrauding the elderly is the Republican party's reason for existing >
  
  It's at least the reason they continue to exist as it is their primary source of funding. >
  
  I told my son that if I ever ever think about voting for a Republican then he is to go and seek guardianship because it means I have dementia. >
  
  I’m gonna steal this for my kids. >
  
  As you need. >
  
  Meet the new GOP. Same as the old GOP. >
  
  Except more openly up front about how little they care about morals, standards, and ethics. >
  
  They just say the quiet part out loud now lol >
  
  Because prior to 2016 GOP politicians thought that being blatant liars and racists would cost them elections.
  Then America made trump president and the GOP realized that there are enough racist voters out there that being open about it on the campaign trail can be a net positive. >
  
  You all can thank that shitstain Chief Justice John Roberts of the US Supreme Court for all of this, thanks to allowing Citizens United to happen.
  All of this blatant shit is a direct result of money in politics.  They don't care because they don't have to care.  The money is still gonna keep coming in no matter what they do/say.  As long as they don't do a Madison Cawthorn, they are bought and paid for. >
  
  I think about that a lot.  The supreme court pretends that their hands are tied because they are just "interpreting the Constitution".  This decision will be the reason that the US falls as a superpower.  The best candidate doesn't win, the best funded candidate wins >
  
  Anyone who tells you that the Supreme Court doesn’t legislate from the bench is either being deceptive or naive. The Constitution can’t say anything about mass political advertising, or carrying assault weapons, or gerrymandering, because none of those things existed when it was written and amending it requires a level of consensus that’s almost impossible to achieve for any controversial issue. >
  
  I mean, they elected a shameless con man to the presidency so this shouldn’t be surprising >
  
  Nixon and that other guy.  Guys.  Yep.  The future is here. >
  
  I always thought Nixon was an anomaly, not the standard! >
  
  He was an anomaly. He accidentally did some good while attempting to do as much evil as possible. 
  Granted, a lot of his good was just the bare minimum token effort, and making sure that more good wasn't done, but modern Republicans would happily light every river on fire if possible.
  And causing a constitutional crisis is mandatory if you want to be taken seriously by the base. >
  
  
  He was an anomaly. He accidentally did some good while attempting to do as much evil as possible.
  
  Quite true.. Nixon basically wanted to mandate employers to provide healthcare. He succesfully passed the clean air act and created the EPA and OSHA. Pushed minimum taxes on businesses.
  Fact is back then... republicans actually had to do things for the people. Now they've learned they can just deny people want it, occasionally give wishy washy statements saying they like the idea... then let someone fillibuster every attempt to get it out to keep themselves off record, and bet on the general ignorance of the voters plus lack of interest in calling them out from the media if they actually do have to vote on it personally. >
  
  He's also responsible for the closest effort we've come to UBI. Unfortunately, other people convinced him to scrap it before it was implemented on a larger scale. >
  
  Party of law and order? >
  
  Don’t forget “personal responsibility” >
  
  And “freedom” >
  
  It’s actually just a continuation of a proud tradition, his problem is the visibility of it all. >
  
  GOP leadership is embracing this kind of exhausting distraction. They love how much media attention is focused on  useful idiots while they go about their business-as-usual cronyism. >
  
  100% this; it's the monkey and the organ grinder.
  ~~Soros~~ Santos is the monkey distraction, Mitch is the grinder planner.
  It's why the Gelatinous Orange One got elected, he made a lot of noise and headlines which allowed Mitch and other 'real' politicians run their agendas unnoticed.
  I think the problem for their plan is now there are too many monkeys that think they get to make decisions which no one wants.
  (edited for name correction) >
  
  
  I think the problem for their plan is now there are too many monkeys that think they get to make decisions which no one wants.
  
  Yup, definitely this.  I mean Mitch  McConnell of all people just worked to hold together enough Republican support to pass a spending package, BEFORE republicans gain power with a house majority.  This from the self titled 'Grim Reaper' whose entire strategy from 20 years has been to kill every bill while a Dem is in the White House.
  He realized that leaving it up to next year's McCarthy/MTG house majority would be disastrous - possibly defaulting and crashing the economy (and his personal wealth), or welcoming Putin to take over half of Europe.
  They'd be too busy yelling about Jewish space lasers turning our military into transgender furries to actually negotiate funding for the government. >
  
  As big of a joke "what's the 2023 House agenda? Hunter's Laptop!" is on r/PoliticalMemes it's probably more accurate in context than is comfortable.
  Kevin doesn't have the acumen to steer the monkeys in the right direction. >
  
  It's a chimpanzee leading the macaques... although frankly that seems like an insult to both species. >
  
  Thats because it is. Those monkeys have highly organized social structures and dont actively try to dismantle them. >
  
  And empathy >
  
  
  George Santos is the Republican Party's future: A shameless con man
  
  That's also the GOP's present and at least the recent past. >
  
  
  Kamala says she smoked weed in college
  
  You think that's comparable to Santos faking his entire resume including where he went to college? If he's ever even gone to one? >
  
  Yes, they do. Because she isn't white, and also she's a Democrat. >
  
  And a she. >
  
  I'm waiting for someone, anyone, to follow the money behind his campaign. >
  
  “Future” >
  
  Is he running now too? GOP candidates are getting wilder and wilder >
  
  Conservatives want to be lied to. >
  
  Conservatives believe in natural hierarchies. There are people who are better, and there are people who are lower, and it is that way for a reason.  People who are smart, talented, and/or blessed by God, are the rich and powerful.  Therefore, the flip must also be true. The rich or powerful must be our betters. >
  
  People will gloss over this comment but that was the result of some very thorough research that examined different beliefs and characteristics. >
  
  George Santos is the pinnacle of perfection of the GOP.  Just make it up as you go, and admit that it's all lies on national TV.  They'll not only love you for it, but vote for your lies in their hundreds of thousands. >
  
  
  They'll not only love you for it, but vote for your lies in their hundreds of thousands.
  
  not really, look at the fox news interview he did with tulsi gabbard on their youtube page. nearly every comment is opposing santos and calling him corrupt. youve just invented some bullshit in your head to create an arbitrary line of division. i dont think conservatives appreciate this any more than liberals. >
  
  But are conservatives pressuring GOP leadership to kick him out of Congress? Upset on the internet don't mean anything. >
  
  How does a poor, uneducated schmuck in podunk New York pressure GOP leadership, exactly? >
  
  If hundreds of poor, uneducated schmucks in podunk New York expressed the opinion that they wanted him gone the GOP would start pressuring him today. Instead they say he's corrupt but so are the other guys and so it goes. >
  
  Santos will be the poster boy for cancel culture; just because he is a fraud and a con man, doesn’t mean he should lose his job. /s >
  
  The perfect Republican. 
  Disgusting. >
  
  Wanted in another country and possibly not even a US citizen. >
  
  His real name is Art Vandelay and he’s an importer/exporter >
  
  r/conservative is totally down with this con, Santos >
  
  I saw the thread where they're talking about his interview with Tulsi
  All they're saying is he's acting like a Democrat. Motherfucking idiots, this is a Republican acting like this. >
  
  I think this is actually a moment where the GOP can repudiate and reject a con-man like Santos, and close the chapter on the Trump Inspired GOP forever.  
  If they don't, if they put power ahead of decency, then they deserve all the scorn and distrust the people heap on them. >
  
  It ends with him saying it's going to go way above the American people heads. Is he shitting on the idiots that voted for him now?
  While true for the most part, that's pretty fucked up lol >
  
  George Santos represents everything a Republican strives for. (Other than the gay part) >
  
  It is the republican party's present and past. >
  
  The base doesn’t care as long as he’ll vote with the party. They’ve been conditioned to believe libruls are the mortal enemy and must be stopped at all costs. >
  
  Campaign finance mysteries, a strong whiff of Russian influence that needs to be investigated, an outstanding warrant for his arrest in Brazil, a prior history of stealing and forging checks from an elderly man on top of the already debunked lies he has told. Please don’t seat this criminal. >
  
  The fact that the GOP is silent and doesn’t care tells you everything >
  
  Also their present.
  Also their past. >
  
  I miss the good old days of Reagan, Nixon, W...  back when the GOP Presidents weren't just shameless con men, they were shameless con artists. 
  Reagan was a goddamn Michelangelo of bullshit, with his words he could paint beautiful images of things that exist only in the imagination of white supremacists. 
  But Trump, he's the most laughably transparent con man I've ever seen. His scams are so blatantly obvious that the only conclusion I can draw is that his victims want to be scammed. 
  I thought it couldn't get any lower, but then this chucklefuck appeared on the scene. >
  
  
  But Trump, he's the most laughably transparent con man I've ever seen. His scams are so blatantly obvious that the only conclusion I can draw is that his victims want to be scammed.
  
  He's following the Alex Jones School of Bullshit. Keep coming up with stupider and stupider bullshit, until you distill your base down to a hard core of complete idiots who will believe anything, no matter how stupid it is. >
  
  I see a “Dateline” 2-hour special in his future … >
  
  "past, present, future." FTFY >
  
  Sooo... Just like Donald Trump? >
  
  It's like Karma, but so much worse... >
  
  Are there not laws against this? If any of us lie completely about our past experience for a job then the employer finds out, we get fired. How is this different? >
  
  It's different in that the courts have consistently held that evaluating the honesty of political candidates is a "political question" that should be answered by having an election. 
  Of course, the US having fixed election dates kind of makes this a problem, when you find out about the person's lies just as they start their term in office. You can't answer the "political question" until the answer is moot, and the person has served their entire term. >
  
  Also it's present, and it's past.
  Someday the media needs to actually stop giving these lying fascists cover. 
  Oh wait, we did that then Ronnie got rid of the fairness doctrine. This is precisely why he did it too. >
  
  This dude commits fraud and then joins the traitors that are attempting to overthrow the Federal Government.
  How is this not illegal in any way? >
  
  They buy Trump NFT's and Alex Jones supplements. They wouldn't vote for anyone who weren't con men. >
  
  Vote Republicans if you want Waste Fraud and abuse in your government leadership. >
  
  They're trained to embrace the predator state. >
  
  This scumbag makes me want to start lying on my resume. Why should I suffer honesty when our own elected officials don't think it's that important? >
  
  Because Baskin Robbins always finds out! >
  
  bOth sIDeS >
  
  over at r/conservative they’re saying “well that’s what Democrats always do” >
  
  present and past too. >
  
  Um, Donald Trump >
  
  Hot take: He's a Russian spy >
  
  Like the Christmas Carol…
  Past
  Present
  Future >
  
  Did y’all forget about Trump ??? >
  
  Uh, If George Santos is the shamless future con man of the Republican Party, what was Trump? >
  
  Future? It’s their present reality. >
  
  Future? They have always been lying garbage. The fact that the party hasn't demanded that he step down immediately is very telling. >
  
  Well he's con man - ish anyway. >
  
  Past, present and future >
  
  That is also the party’s past and present. >
  
  He should be charged with fraud >
  
  Trump proved that Republicans love nothing more than being lied to, so this guy is only giving conservatives more of what they love. >
  
  Future, past, and present >
  
  No reporter should ever ask him anything other than when will you resign or other questions about his fraud. It doesn’t matter what his positions are, or what his agenda is. Don’t give a conman air. >
  
  shameless conman is also their past. >
  
  How is this their future and not also their present and past? >
  
  What is glaringly missing in the discussions of George Santos and his many lies is the crime of check fraud he committed in Brazil before skipping town. Because that is even more important than whether he's Jewish or jew-ish. Media talking heads don't seem to want to discuss it at all. Tulsi Gabbard grilled him, but never brought that up. Dems have discussed him on shows, but never bothered to raise the issue.
  So a soon-to-seated US Congressman is on a lam from a foreign country for check fraud, yet nobody seems to care. The Brazilian authorities probably didn't know where he was until the NYT broke the story. 
  Could they issue an Interpol arrest warrant for him? >
  
  Future? More like past and present. >
  
  Isn't a shameless con man the Republican Party's present, too? >
  
  Second verse
  Same as the first >
  
  Very strange looking man - the grandpa glasses gotta go. I can’t tell if he’s pudgy or stout. Trump’s clothes might fit him pretty well. I’d suggest an elastic waistband. 
  In all the other pictures he dresses & wears his hair like he’s in his 60’s. Was he raised by his grandparents? >
  
  He's appealing to his core demographic. >
  
  Basically a costume >
  
  Honestly folks, this used to be a party of ideas. But def no longer. Every time you'd think, "they can't get lower than this," they (the GOP) go ahead and prove me wrong. I don't think we ever end up with a one party system, but can't quite see how the future plays out; Dems and Independents? >
  
  Historically not one party, but some party should move too far in their direction as to create room for the 3rd party.  Something is artificial about these two parties existing for so long.  It reminds me of 2009-2016 when the Fed artificially held prime interest at near zero, giving free $ to banks and corporations for seven years and setting the stage for these record profits and wealth shifting. >
  
  He looks like the flesh embodiment of a chatbot >
  
  Who wants a con man for President? Americans. >
  
  He'll be in good company with Kyrsten Sinema.  Both of them prove  that you can simply say whatever you think voters want to hear to get elected yet they'll pay no penalty apart from reduced chance of reelection. >
  
  The future of the GOP ladies and gentlemen or rather the present reality >
  
  Also it's past so really no surprise here >
  
  Past, present, AND future! >
  
  He’s a baby trump. >
  
  For that matter, Trump also is baby trump >
  
  So status quo >
  
  Fitting: that's also the party's present and past. >
  
  Past and present too >
  
  He looks like the kid who sang that hippopotamus Christmas song... Nightmare. >
  
  Fits right in… >
  
  
  the Republican Party's future: A shameless con man
  
  So nothing is changing then.  Got it. >
  
  There is NO BOTTOM for the GOP. This is the new normal. Buckle up. Maybe just maybe it’s time for some arrests and real-life accountability. Why would they stop? We do nothing about it. >
  
  He isn’t anything new though. There is a long history of liars in the GOP. Trump, Boebert, Gingrich, Jordan etc etc ad nauseum. This is a stupid headline. >
  
  Future ... and present ... and past. >
  
  He is their present >
  
  I’m guessing 0 possibly of him resigning his seat >
  
  So no change? Got it. >
  
  He’s using Trump’s playbook. Can’t blame him. >
  
  Future? Remember Trump? Thirty thousand lies and counting. >
  
  *past, present, and future >
  
  To be fair conmen are also their past and present, he’s just really flagrant about it >
  
  oh its the present and the past as well. you can trace it all the way back to nixon and its only gotten worse with blatant dishonesty across the board. the GOP is a cancer to american progress, and its been perhaps our greatest failure as a democracy to not punish these clowns constant failure, dishonesty, and utter lack of anything resembling of leadership. >
  
  I would say every Democrat should be shouting from the rooftops "is this the kind of man you want representing you and your party in Congress?" But I would be afraid to find out how many people said "yes". >
  
  Future? Also past and present >
  
  The whole Republican Party is in love with liars, adulterers, thieves and cheats. This is the make up for success in their eyes. >
  
  The entire Republican party is full of shameless conmen. >
  
  I feel like Republicans in his district were so pleased he was a Republican with so much Democratic leanings. He was Hispanic and Gay and Jewish. The most ideal straw candidate. >
  
  lol "Future." >
  
  *present >
  
  And it’s past and present. >
  
  No. He's their party's present >
  
  Not future… He is their present. >
  
  George Santos is the Republican Party's future: Another shameless con man. 
  FTFY >
  
  So, another shameless con man? >
  
  In the future, republicans will continue doing what they’ve been doing for at least the past 15 years. Hot take, Salon. This is why I subscribe. >
  
  Future, past, present >
  
  Not sure I buy the idea that the first job of Democrats is protecting Republicans from themselves. >
  
  Roger Stone was helping Nixon long before this shameless conman was born. >
  
  Why doesn’t the DNC just keep private investigators on staff to dig up the excessive amounts of dirt on all of these fraudsters and make it public, unrelentingly? >
  
  Because that takes money and time, which could be better used elsewhere >
  
  Just saw a thing on Fox News about how he shouldn't step down because of AOC or something. Then it had a segment about how the Libs of Tik Tok woman called the Left violent. This is a weird channel. >
  
  Future? Are you new here? >
  
  Lmao. A shameless con man is literally Trump in a nutshell?
  What do you mean, "future"? >
  
  He’s got GOP presidential candidate written all over him. >
  
  When Trump is your champion, this is definitely the future of the Party. >
  
  Santos looks like a rip off Toby Maguire >
  
  On Santos, follow the money. This guy has exposed himself to investigation to a degree that will wear him out. Campaign finance, tax, citizenship, he's going to be toast. 
  Who gets charged first, Santos or Trump? >
  
  He is probably one of the greatest gifts Democrats could home for in an elected Republican.  A Liar, Grifter, Russian Supported Traitor who can be used to show how bad populists are at vetting and can be used to cudgel Republican candidates across the country in suburban areas. >
  
  OP were you not paying attention to Trump? He is the definition of a "shameless con man". >
  
  Just like Trump >
  
  Santos is a test of Kevin McCarthy leadership; he should be publicly calling for new elections for that district, even if the GOP were to lose the 1 house seat. In the long run he would have gained more respect from the GOP house members and possible gain more house seats in 2024. But like 1/6, McCarthy again makes the incorrect decision to visit Mara-A-Logo now he is struggling to get 218 required votes to be Speaker! >
  
  What does it mean to be “Jew-ish”?  I’m so confused >
  
  I think they mean their present and past as well >
  
  Future? Did they miss the whole trump presidency thing? >
  
  Future..? More like past, present, and future. >
  
  Future? It’s been scams for decades. >
  
  But he didn't lie about being a Republican! 🤣 >
  
  All the pictures of him creep me out, I can't put my finger on it >
  
  Nothing matters but the (R) >
  
  Funny, that’s their past too. >
  
  "After all, what is the modern GOP, if not a holding station for every two-bit criminal and grifter who wants the job security that can only come with exploiting the endlessly credulous Republican base? The party can no more start kicking out the fraudsters than it can stop trying to cut taxes for the rich. This is just who they are and what they do. George Santos is in no sense an anomaly. He is the Republican present and, even more to the point, the Republican future." >
  
  The Problem with the party of Lincoln is that it is the Party of Hoover, Nixon, and Trump ! >
  
  He's really no different than Donnie "Fats". >
  
  Just like the last president*. >
  
  As well as their past and present >
  
  Meanwhile Kevin McCarthy has been silent. He needs this vote otherwise he can’t be speaker. Meanwhile news reports are coming out he is wanted in Brazil for fraud. Only heard it on radio so not sure of the source. Either way, this Santos is a real Republican. Lie, lie and continue to lie. The three attributes Trump lives by. Just like the fake Jew, gay, charity owner, banker, real estate investor. He is a real piece of S$&t >
  
  Future?  It's its present. >
  
  Not future. It's what they are RIGHT FUCKING NOW. >
  
  If they reran the election for that congressional seat again today, 98% of republican voters would still vote for him despite the evidence that he's an utter fraud. A con man can not only survive in today's GOP, they can thrive. >
  
  Future? Were you in denial about it or something? lol >
  
  I don’t get why we’re still doing single member representation. It is clear that the electorate for each party only cares about electing a warm body with the correct letter next to their name. Imagine what could happen if we had more than 2 platform choices in a general election. >
  
  It’s also their past. >
  
  If you can't win in the court of public opinion, cheating is your only option. >
  
  Republican leaders response to George Santos: crickets.
  The silence is deafening. 
  Right Repubs? >
  
  Future? He’s their present and past. The only thing changing is the con men/women are getting stupider. >
  
  Haven’t we done this already in 2016? >
  
  Not just their future, but their present and their recent past. >
  
  the Jew-ish thing, while amazing, is a distraction. Follow the money. >
  
  “Future”? 
  Where the f** you been?
  Since at least Reagan…. >
  
  And their present, and past. >
  
  The future? >
  
  Future? >
  
  Surprisingly con men are also the past and present >
  
  
  A shameless con man
  
  Like Trump isn't? >
  
  And a possible Russian asset. So it lines up >
  
  They already have a shameless con man donald john trump, he's been the helm of the GOP >
  
  Future? It’s also it’s past. >
  
  Why do they always look like the devil? >
  
  That's also their past and present. >
  
  It's hard to find employment when you've just woken up from a decades-long coma. I mean, talk about gaps in your job history...
  I think it's great that the media is offering these poor people jobs as headline writers. >
  
  Isn’t this an unsustainable model for the GOP? Disenfranchising your voters (by ruining their faith in elections) while also proving to them that their candidates are completely untrustworthy? I mean we know politicians are liars, but this is crossing another line here. >
  
  He's their present. >
  
  your country is over … get used to it … it’s only going to get worse >
  
  Santos just made shortlist for VP. >
  
  Ironically he is too young I think.  Unless he lies about that too. >
  
  And Barnum smiles. >
  
  Well, his future as an elected member of the House is doomed. Since he's no longer Jewish but jew-ish, he won't get much of the support of the Jews in his neck of the woods. Dems are likely to take part that seat. >
  
  Trumpian was the beginning of the end of the do nothing party. they vanished during the depression and this is  another downward cycle. >
  
  "Have you no shame?" >
  
  Ask >
  
  Only difference between him and trump is he’s gay and not orange. >
  
  McCarthy loves him and I guess now that’s all that matters >
  
  MAGA fast track.  Santos streamlined Trumps con by decades. >
  
  Is he really the future of the Republican Party though? I haven’t seen many in the Republican Party claiming that. 
  The guy is a con man and I don’t think he should have been elected, but if we threw out every politician that lied about their credentials, personal life, etc on the campaign trail, we wouldn’t have anyone left in Congress, and wouldn’t have had a President since, well, ever. >
  
  What I don't get is why the news media didnt go through his resume and verify his credentials?  They always want to rush to print the name of the rape VICTIM or anything else they can do to get something in the news, but this guy has a totally fabricated life and is now going to the House or Representatives.
  Lots of people to blame, but the news media is a the top of that heap! >
  
  "Nothing in that article convinced me that Santos wouldn't be sworn into Congress, and neither did the evidence that he is almost certainly not Jewish, as he had claimed to be"
  Laughs in Elizabeth Warren lol >
  
  GOP's future? He's the GOP's present. >
  
  Future? >
  
  There are Republicans who are really Democrats, but there are no Democrats who are really Republicans. Even though eveything people say, I assume to be a lie, especially anything coming from leftists, this Santos dude might just be a swamp rat. >
  
  Monkey see monkey do when your mentor is trump >
  
  Nah it's okay guys, I identify as a Holocaust survivor. >
  
  Fox News today said he shouldn't step down because AOC. They really didn't have a point. >
  
  This guy needs to be kicked out. >
  
  I'm pretty sure that future was established with trump's election. >
  
  The party of conmen, pedophiles, rapists,...and Putin. >
  
  No more shameless than Trump.  I'm waiting for the next Republican candidate to lie about being an astronaut, his time on Seal Team 6 when he killed Bin Laden against the orders of Obama who wanted to give him a medal. >
  
  Welcome to NY. They saw a gay immigrant they expected to lose. He duped them. >
  
  I just don’t see post-millennial voters taking to this future. Hopefully the GOP grifts itself right into extinction. >
  
  Always has been… >
  
  No he’s perfect for representing the Republican party, all a buncha hacks, liars, thief’s, and conn men. They found their guy👏🏼 >
  
  The future must be now. >
  
  The fact that santos can fabricate his entire life, admit it, and still refuse to step down is truly mind boggling. >
  
  I find it hilarious that far right outlets like Ben Shapiros daily fail are reporting on this asshole but conveniently leave out the fact that he is a republican >
  
  They already had Trump so it's safe to say this guy is the party's new normal. >
  
  He’s also their current, and their past. >
  
  Everyone understands that santos is a test case for republican strategy going forward right? Less about principles and record and more about surface level looks. If congressional leadership really lets him take his seat be prepared for a lot of blue seats get “flipped” by republicans that aren’t at all fit to be a congressional intern. >
  
  Same as it ever was. >
  
  Republicans will get away with putting crooks in office just as many times as they are allowed to do so. Does anyone in the NY Democratic Party know how to do opposition research? >
  
  Spider-Man George pointing at Spider-Man Republican Party meme >
  
  It is a huge integrity issue for the Republicans. The perception of integrity, once lost is very hard to get back even with money. >
  
  It's the same old GOP shit... just not hiding it anymore, do whatever it takes and Blame the Dem's >
  
  Past, present, and future. >
  
  Sounds like the past, too. >
  
  Uh, republicans have been shameless con men for decades… so… it’s not the future, it’s just more of the same. >
  
  Future? Sounds a lot like the present party >
  
  Dumb-as-fuck political writers who think this is the "future" versus the past fifty-plus years are part of how we got into this existential crisis. >
  
  Nothing new he just got caught! >
  
  Why not though? Doesn't seem to be much consequence to lying, cheating, stealing, etc. >
  
  This is nothing new >
  
  I don’t understand how the party of “rules, law, and order” got so desperate to win at any cost. This guy. Hershel Walker. Others. Why? >
  
  people pretend to be christian all the time but it's only a problem if you pretend to be jewish. >
  
  Kinda odd to see a major publication spell a word as simple as "present" in the headline. >
  
  It appears that from now on, every Republican candidate will be asked a question, followed up by”Is that a lie” >
  
  “Look, I’m as Jewish as you want me to be.  I’m as Jewish as you need me to be!  I’m also a Christian.  Im also Musli-…ok I’m definitely not Muslim.” >
  
  Just say existence because it’s their past, present, and future. >
  
  My brain is weird and I read this as "John Stamos".
  It was an interesting few moments in my head. >
  
  Also Present >
  
  I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to, too. >
  
  Trump must be proud of his bastard child >
  
  Future?!? More like the status quo. >
  
  They are all shameless. What makes him so special?