comment: >
  
  Look, if I tear up the bank robbery note before the cops arrive, it's not a crime OK. Let it go. /s
context: What an annoying sack of skin. Please go home, nobody likes you Kerri. >
  
  Qari! >
  
  Qoward >
  
  That would be because Lake is beginning to experience the second step of the two-step process beginning with “Fuck around”. >
  
  
  The fact that Plaintiff failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence required for each element of (the law) does not equate to finding that her claims were, or were not, groundless and presented in bad faith
  
  OK. Fine, those two things don't equate. But you saying that two things don't equate doesn't mean that her claims weren't groundless and presented in bad faith.
  Trump failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence in all his election fraud lawsuits, and that doesn't equate either. Except, you know, for the part where he presented those groundless claims in bad faith. >
  
  Right, this is a nicer version of "she's an idiot for believing this because there's no evidence, but she's just an idiot, not a liar."
  Though I feel like saying her claims aren't groundless while also saying there isn't any clear/convincing evidence seems odd. Pick one, but you can't have both. >
  
  Yeah, that's my thing. There are elements of her case that need to be proved in order for it to have a proper legal basis. As far as I can tell, she and her lawyers didn't even attempt to prove those elements. It's hard not to see that as bad faith. >
  
  "The Hill has reached out to Lake’s campaign for further comment."
  Please don't.  We're really not interested in anything she has to say. >
  
  i second this
  we need to force obscurity on a lot more of people >
  
  How can this person be considered a good candidate to lead in government when she cannot even control her impulses to make rude or aggressive "tweets" when things do not go her way? What kind of leader is that? There are high school teens with better self-control. >
  
  She wasn’t a good candidate. >
  
  I fucking hate that we're living in this world when it could be so awesome for all of us...we are really stupid animals. >
  
  Humanity needs a greater predator to become one. >
  
  I have hope we get lucky on ASI, otherwise we're probably fucked but whatever, we were all gonna die anyway. >
  
  Everyone just needs to realize that the division is premeditated decisiveness. All this just to enrich themselves both sides is clearly robbing from the same cradle. One just wants everything to burn for everyone that don’t look like them because of where they are on the equator. It’s amazing if you think of humanity as what it is a spec on the cosmos. Love each other is all we got that separates us. Wish more people realized this. Life is what you make it. >
  
  Can we stop posting about Kari Lake? She's literally meaningless. >
  
  I think her constant election denial needs to be punished, it's tiring hearing about her, but this shit has got to stop. >
  
  Pay her no mind, she's an attention whore. And nothing upsets attention whores like lack of attention. >
  
  $700,000 in sanctions will do that to a person. >
  
  See?  We can force pig headed MAGA's to mend their ways.  Just takes a bit of judicial attention. >
  
  Nah, judge denied sanctions and just enforced legal fees yesterday.  No lesson will be learned here. >
  
  Every journey starts with a step.  This case was that step. >
  
  
  the article does not cite which legal experts believe the judge committed impropriety, and provided no evidence of the allegations.
  
  MAGA >
  
  The same experts who said the election was improperly run.
  You know, the same experts who showed up to court... no one. >
  
  Oh yeah?
  I saw on Facebook that… >
  
  Ah a fellow researcher >
  
  Shit, Republicans apparently can get away with anything. Here is this absolutely schmuck shitting on a judge and yet no consequences. 
  This timeline is whack. >
  
  She does have to pay $38,000 in court fees for losing per Arizona law.
  The next one will be sanctionable if she continues the lies and files another suit. >
  
  Hey Kari Lake is a polished ~~tur~~ tv personality, she knows you can’t fuck around for real, throw book at her. >
  
  As a lawyer, I have to say, some clients never know when to shut the f- up. >
  
  "I should not have said that" does not mean yo did not say that.
  However it does make it easier for someone to prove you knew you should not have said it. >
  
  exactly did say it and now maybe you might think oh well that was a bad idea but at the time you were fine with it and you did do it >
  
  Can’t wait for her to become completely irrelevant. To think we were 600 votes away from having that happen to Boebert is depressing >
  
  I got a three-day Reddit ban for making fun of Kari Lake’s easily-duped victims — I mean “supporters”. >
  
  I got banned completely from r/karilake >
  
  You know saying oops (deleting the post) doesn't change the fact that she posted it in the first place. >
  
  Living with that 1983 Pat Benetar haircut must be eating away at Kari’s minuscule brain. Maybe she should upgrade a decade to 1993 mallbangs. >
  
  You should see the blank stares I get when I say I want a "Sharon Stone" cut. 😭 >
  
  From the Total Recall years >
  
  Now, Trump for sure would not do any such wise things. >
  
  Just give it up. Nearly everyone has moved on from this failed tactic. >
  
  Does she really think acting like a Stark Raving Lunatic helps her? >
  
  Unfortunately yes, if she’s auditioning to be Trump’s running mate >
  
  FYI Kari. Deleting your tweet doesn’t erase it, you silly dipshit. >
  
  
  Lake deletes tweet
  
  Isn't she the one always acting "tough" all the time? Nice coward move, wimp >
  
  Attempting to destroy evidence means what?  You’re innocent?  Ha ha ha ha NOT! >
  
  Yes, lady, mind your hateful treasonous lies on Twitter. Don’t pull a Trump!! >
  
  The trumpet’s lies are finally hitting walls.
  I really didn’t think there was a wall you could get these morons backs up against. Finally, good people standing up to these charlatans regardless of political affiliation. Bury her and her bullshit lies, the “evidence” submitted was such shit. She needs to be sanction and pay the fees. >
  
  Why delete the tweet. If the tweet had truth, then she cancel cultures herself. >
  
  Embarrassment. >
  
  Thing is she was claiming election fraud before the election even started >
  
  get fucked kari.   go back into the nowhere >
  
  Yet another idiot who just seems not to understand that once something is on the internet it will always be on the internet. >
  
  We need to create a sorest loser of the year award, and just humiliate whoever gets nominated for it. >
  
  Thus lady is going to down like Anita Bryant. And fast >
  
  Arizona Jan6ers seem much better armed. Based on their intimidation tatics at polling places. Perhaps they will do something on the inauguration date.
  Worst that can happen to them if failed is a misdemeanor charge with 90 days jail and $500.00 fine for most of them.
  May be many will bring out their Confederate flags that they fly on their homes. >
  
  There should be a law where if you delete a tweet or blog post or phone message or whatever, you're admitting to whatever you're trying to hide and held responsible for it.  You'd get in trouble for burning evidence, right?
  Don't type shit online if you don't want to be held personally responsible.  Do these people legitimately think it disappears from reality if you delete something that was on a public forum?