comment: >
  
  Make sure to first steal the images from small clothing companies and then photoshop them to celebrate the achievements you never actually accomplished.
context: Should be paid out of her own pocket rather than her campaign. >
  
  She should face charges for trying to use state assets to reverse an election. >
  
  Treason used to have more severe consequences >
  
  Until it became a staple of the GQP. >
  
  As much as it pains me to say it, not throwing people out of helicopters is a part of what makes good people good people. What a fucking world we’ve made, hey?
  I wouldn’t mind if they were left to their own devices, e.g. if we stopped funding failed red state governance with blue state taxpayer dollars, which would have the same effect by a far more moral mechanism. >
  
  I've always liked the idea of withholding federal benefits from states whose senators vote against them. >
  
  As someone who grew up in Texas, if that ever happened Texas would go bankrupt after a natural disaster.   The chuckle twins of Canadian Ted and Cornyn love to grandstand about budget responsibility and always vote against aid for other states, but fuck me if ANYTHING remotely bad ever happens in Texas they beg like crackheads for federal aid and relief funds. >
  
  Well I think it is annoying to see them vote against things and then brag about the money they bring in from a bill they voted against.
  But if they had to lose the money by not supporting the bill we'd see more good faith votes (or ideally angry voters getting better candidates in). >
  
  Let's be 100% real. None of that would happen. You'd just have them spin it as "Democrats want you to starve and die. How disgusting and vile." and yeah, that'd be about it. Election would come and Ted Cruz would be back right where he was because y'all like to get fucked sideways down there by your power grid and everyone voted into power. >
  
  This headline, while accurate, is misleading. Hobbs and Maricopa County were seeking an additional $700k in reimbursement from Lake, which the judge did not grant. I'm assuming taxpayers will be covering that. Party of fiscal responsibility and all that. Still, Arizona's taxpayers are getting quite a deal when compared to the more than $200 million California's had to waste on the sad recall attempt of Gov. Newsom. >
  
  We've already paid $90 million or so on Ducey's container "wall." >
  
  You mean the one with the gaps because of the hilly terrain? >
  
  Correct the one that has already been cut through in multiple places and the border patrol hates because it reduces visibility around the border. >
  
  $90m for a blind spot >
  
  75 million for a publicity stunt towards the right. 15 million for grifting if we're being generous here in assuming they didn't pocket more of it. >
  
  She could sell worthless NFTs of herself as a fictional action figure.