comment: >
  
  I get the feeling like some people just want this to go away as quickly as possible . Shame because I would like to know if any of the tokenised  stocks where used as locates by market makers.
context: Routine procedural plea. IMO - Not Guilty will be his plea. >
  
  He has done exactly the same thing the Enron execs did play by play. It's eerie. The embezzling, the "we are the future" approach to the company, the taking of people's retirement money, the folding of the company, the "apology" (we had no idea) wide eyed tour and now the indictment. It's weird to see the early 2000's replaying itself fully 20 years later.   
  Pretty sure he's going to go with the totes not guilty plea. I think he still thinks he can get away with it and/or explain it away. Seems like he's the type that cares more about how he looks on the surface. I feel terrible for anyone that invested with him. >
  
  What a pleasant surprise,  a Judge recused themselves as their spouse was a lawyer who's firm was working with FTX (prior to bankruptcy). >
  
  Well, we need to maintain a (thin) veneer of protocol as the rube of the century takes the rap for the global money laundering technocrats. >
  
  Why does this matter? Serious question >
  
  I haven't heard anything about jurisdiction.  I thought most of this occurred outside the U.S.. >
  
  Complex question. Victims sprinkled everywhere, servers are where? Fraud using telephone, telegraph and internet. We've seen numerous people who were offshore committing crimes brought back for prosecution. Some even foreign nationals.