comment: Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. 
  Of course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud?  He defrauded the voters.  It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”.  Screw the voters.