comment: >
  
  Because of "Consequences".
context: Just like when they said they didnt transfer drones to russia? >
  
  What else would one expect from a nationwide all-powerful fanatically religious dictator? >
  
  But secretly they were delivered 2 weeks ago >
  
  They need them to relent their own people. >
  
  I seem to recall reading somewhere that Israel threatened to bomb the snot out of Iranian airfields if they see Iran giving weapons to Russia. Could this decision be because of the threat from the Israelis? >
  
  No of course not, they can never admit that Israel is real (get it? IS RAEL IS REAL) >
  
  That was the slogan proposed by Israel when it was hosting the Eurovision, but it got refused by international organization committee on the grounds of "nationalist bias". >
  
  They will be if Iran will transfer them. >
  
  They don't have any that are functional.  .
  Or
  They are already there 
  Oh ya,
  Except they would be firing salvos. >
  
  It'd be about that time to open a big can of WHOOP-ASS! Gloves off. No nuke deal, killing their people because women don't want to be killed over head coverings and then helping Russia in Ukraine, time to take out the trash. >
  
  Yeah, and then Europe will have to deal with yet another incoming migrant crisis when a country of 80 million people gets bombed, insurgency is once again the word of the day, and there's uncountable numbers of civilian casualties.
  ​
  But hey, it's all positives if you're not the one dealing with the consequences. >
  
  I like how you get to them with saying migrant crisis rather than saying people will die really shows how human redditors are. >
  
  Just me or did anyone else think that was a fat zelensky? >
  
  Just you >
  
  They be playing murmafurma or consequences >
  
  Drop me in on the frontlines of Iran. Go ahead. >
  
  we dont deliver missiles to russia....all prices are ex works they come and pick them up