comment: >
  
  I feel like that is because it is actually condescending
context: I'm a 5'11 female but I completely understand why you'd feel that way. It's like 'hey look, we made up a compliment so you'll feel better about yourself!' >
  
  Yes exactly! >
  
  I think the insulting part is that adding the King label implies through overcompensation that that there's something wrong with or bad about being short, and that "talls" are better than "shorts." That's a false dichotomy based on a current vapid social filter trend among shallow young women. In real life, people of all heights fall in love all the time. >
  
  I think you are just observably wrong.  There is a reason men are bigger than women, it's because women choose bigger men to reproduce with.  There is no reason to lie about it. >
  
  It's patronizing. >
  
  Calling someone 'short king' is not only pointing out their height, but also assuming they need your reassurance to deal with it. The most unsexy thing about a short, or bald, or big nosed, or overweight, etc... man (or woman) is if they are fixated on it. Confidence is sexier than hell! >
  
  Ahh that explains why i get no bitches >
  
  It does, have an award. >
  
  Short king beats dwarf boy every day. >
  
  Dwarf King is where it's really at >
  
  To be fair I’m a hetero guy who would totally fuck Thorin Oakenshield >
  
  You'd go to jail for that. >
  
  Cause it'd be necrophilia >
  
  Adding short just dismisses any good the phrase was meant to do. A king is a king, regardless of his stature. >
  
  It's ok, you are a king either way. >
  
  Lets hope hes not french than cuz we all know what happens to kings there. >
  
  Not short, but completely agree. >
  
  Yeah I hate it.