comment: >
  
  I'm just saying... rationally speaking, if you can't prove they were original documents, you cannot jump straight to "yep that's it, hang em".  Are the odds good that they were originals?  I'd say yes, but you have to prove it.
context: It's only clear if one can prove they were originals, not copies.  I'm all for holding them accountable but you toss the baby out with the bath water. Be rational and logical. >
  
  I’m sure they brunt copies because that’s what you do with incriminating evidence copy it and burn the copies. Jesus man.