comment: >
  
  you must be jew-ish too.
context: Every single one of those lies is a huge red flag. But the lie that his mother was killed on 9/11 is next level despicable. I wonder if MTG will keep righteously defending this guy after the rest of the lies are exposed. Cus you know they’re coming. >
  
  He's more of a pathological liar than Trump.
  Trump told three different lies about 9/11: that he went to the site to offer assistance to the responders, that he looked out his window and saw Muslims celebrating, and he now had the tallest building in New York.
  Trump, at least, didn't try to rewrite his entire family history. He even acknowledges his older brother died of addiction. 
  If the Republicans don't have George Santos removed, they're going to have a guy who tells a different story at every turn. He's not going to fall in line. >
  
  You realize Trump claimed his family immigrated from Sweden when it really cam from Germany right?
  Now why would a family lie about leaving Germany and change their last name.  It is almost like they were running from something. >
  
  If it turned out the Trump family fortune was built on stolen Nazi gold I would not be surprised. >
  
  No, too early. His grandfather made his initial money running a brothel during the Yukon gold rush and left Germany to dodge the draft. So you know, true Trump family shit >
  
  Nein Kaiser,Ich habe bone spurs! >
  
  Here's the list - it's insane he can still be seated after all of this.
  Graduated from college: Nope!
  Worked for Goldman Sachs & Citigroup: Nope!
  Family owned properties: Nope!
  Descendent of Holocaust Survivors: Nope!
  Openly gay, claims to now be married to a man: Maybe, there are no records to support this?
  Biracial (Caucasian & Black): Maybe? But considering the next one, probably not. 
  Mother killed on 9/11: Nope! Died in 2016
  Brain Tumor / health issues: No records to support
  Lost 4 employees in Pulse shooting: Nope!
  Founded a Charitable foundation: Nope! >
  
  I would pay $100 to any man who will confess to having sex with him at anytime in history. >
  
  I'll confess to it. It'd be a lie but 100 bucks is 100 bucks. Just send my check to St. Jude's. >
  
  Hey, I could really use 100 bucks. Can I go have sex with him now or must the sex be retroactive? >
  
  As long as they don't determine that he's actually a liberal, the GOP doesn't care who he is. >
  
  Or in McCarthy’s disgusting case, as long as he votes for me to be speaker. >
  
  Watch him gain one vote and lose more over this.  That would be poetic justice. >
  
  Missing from the list:
  Claims to be gay and having been gay for a long time. He divorced his wife before going into politics. Doesn’t mean he hasn’t been gay for a long time, but he hasn’t clarified why he was married to a woman. 
  Claims made to Tulsi Gabbard that most Americans would not understand the work that he did for Goldman Sachs and Citigroup. He hasn’t even tried to explain. 
  Claims that he made $50k per year a couple of years ago and had no assets. In the last two years he made enough money to lend hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. How?
  Claims that he made a lot of money through the Devolder company, a corporation that has no web presence, no known clients, and might not even exist. >
  
  A guy like him is single? Imagine that!
  In all seriousness though it was fun to watch him squirm as Tulsi basically kicked his ass in that interview which I’m sure he expected to be a cakewalk. >
  
  It was FoxNews. He expected a cakewalk. And Tulsi wasn’t too hard on him. Just hard enough to make him squirm a little. Not squeeze him dry. >
  
  I don’t know if he’s just that arrogant or if he thought…with all that’s going on in the country…he’s going to lie about all these things and nobody’s going to question it. Or he’s been doing this his whole life and up until now he’s never been caught. 
  I’ve known people like this at work and there are patterns. But even still…there are younger and better con artists every day out there who are really good if they know their audience. This guy wasn’t that good; it was more like the folks who were doing the fact-checking didn’t get to him on time. I think. >
  
  The root problem is that no one was fact checking him.  News organizations don’t care about local political races, even for Congress, unless they already know there’s a story.  Local political candidate lied in his bio is not a good enough story for the editors to assign their limited resources on.
  Edit: which is to say that we really need more local journalists to look into local politics and politicians.  Unfortunately, nobody is paying for that, so we all end up paying for it in the end. >
  
  There's a LIST now? Oy vey...