comment: >
  
  You guys want this so badly, but its not going to amount to anything. Nothing at all. 
  This is taken directly from the court documents:
  
  Prior to trial it is difficult to determine whether Sheppard will provide sufficient evidence 
  supporting some elements of the public authority defense and/or the entrapment-by-estoppel 
  defense, such as whether Sheppard “actually relied on,” Chrestman, 525 F. Supp. 3d at 31, 
  statements by former President Trump. But in this case, the Court can determine, without hearing 
  evidence at trial, that Sheppard’s public authority defense as he describes it will fail because former
  President Trump’s statements did not amount to an express or implied statement of the law.
  Sheppard points to the following statements made by former President Trump in his speech: 
  "And after this, we’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you, we’re going 
  to walk down. . . . I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the 
  Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. . . . And 
  they want to recertify their votes. . . . But the only way that can happen is if Mike 
  Pence agrees to send it back. . . . If not . . . you will have an illegitimatePresident. That’s what you’ll have. And we can’t let that happen. . . . We must 
  stop the steal and then we must ensure that such outrageous election fraud never 
  happens again. . . . And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like 
  hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore . . . . So we’re going to, we’re 
  going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue . . . And we’re going to the Capitol, 
  and we’re going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they 
  need to take back our country. . . . So let’s walk down Pennsylvania Ave."
  Reply to Opp’n to Notice of Public Authority at 7 (emphases in original).
  These words only encourage those at the rally to march to the Capitol—nothing more—
  and do not address legality at all.
  
  Before you all start hyperventilating and shaking your Mountain Dew all over the place, let me please make it clear that I am very aware of how much of a slimy, piece of trash this garbage person is. 
  What irritates me more than this charlatan clown and that other slimy and demented scumbag, is the millions and millions of thoughtless and lazy supporters who continue to feed them both. 
  You have to see this, right?
  Edit: you don't see it.
context: "March on down to the capitol."
  "Fight like hell." 
  "It was stolen from you."
  "I'll be there with you."
  "Be there, will be wild."
  Asked? Flat out fucking told them. >
  
  "But he also said peacefully once!" - r/conservative >
  
  Only problem is to have this conversation you need to be able to comment. And that sub is a flaired-user-only circle-jerk safe-space. >
  
  I got a temporary ban from a subreddit I'd never heard of because I tried and failed to comment there once. 'tis a silly place >
  
  Was it justice served? I got a permanent ban from there and /conservative because I literally quoted Trump. That was the whole comment. Instant ban >
  
  Sounds right >
  
  trump is an unforgivable loser, 
  no class 
  no morals
  he will go down as one of the most despicable Americans ever, more than the worst of all our serial killers combined because given the chance he gladly would have sacrificed any life innocent or not to keep playing "world leader"
  I will go to my grave never understanding how anyone could have looked at him and thought he was smart, never mind capable of running the country and risking their own lives by storming the capital . . . for HIM
  ​
  donald fucking trump >
  
  I’ve never seen anyone with absolutely zero fucking redeeming qualities. even fucking hitler liked dogs and art. Trump is a soulless black hole from hell >
  
  A child who couldn't get anyone to play "Make the baby cry" with him?  The game consisted of throwing rocks at children in strollers. >
  
  Who did that? Source? >
  
  Lock him up already! >
  
  We’re gonna see different variations of this title for the next 10 years. >
  
  I just hate how right you are good job old chap >
  
  I remember saying this same exact thing on a different account about 3 years ago regarding him and Russia. Got downvoted to hell lol. >
  
  Haha me too I have been saying it on every post because while I'm holding on to hope for justice I know it's unrealistic. >
  
  
  A slew of Jan. 6 defendants have sought to argue that Trump somehow blessed their decision to breach the Capitol, saying they were misled into believing their actions were legal. Though Trump has no power to permit others to violate federal laws, many in the crowd might have viewed his instructions as legal permission, they’ve argued. Those defenses have largely failed in courts, and the one jury to hear that claim — in the case of Dustin Thompson — rejected it, finding Thompson guilty on all charges.
  
  Jim Jones would be jealous of the hold Trump has over millions of Americans. It's incredible that they're this lost. >
  
  Turns out there is no "low IQ" exemption for Trump followers. Storming the Capitol in an attempt to overthrow an election is against the law. Full stop. >
  
  And carries two of our most serous charges, sedition and treason.
  It's time the DoJ started treating it as such.
  The so called "beauty of our legal system" is no one is above the law.
  Except that's completely bullshit and needs to change. This is our society, mine and yours. I'm sick of seeing shitbirds get away with everything. It's a slap in the goddamned face. >
  
  “Suggests”? Can we please be done with the tap dance? He did. We heard it. We ALL heard it - it’s even on tape!! >
  
  If he could, Trump would have ordered (not asked) them to break the law >
  
  "evidence" like his public words we all watched while he said them in real time on live television, which was recorded for posterity >
  
  You think so?  Could that lead to some consequences for him on this then? >
  
  I was being facetious, I am getting weary of the headlines with consequences soon for obvious crimes.  I am ready for the headlines of first former president to be formally charged with insurrection, and the litany of other crimes he has committed. >
  
  There's no "suggest" about it! >
  
  Yeah we all saw with our own eyes. Is this bizarro world? Was a failed coup attempt. The orange menace needs to be held accountable or the doj is nothing but a rich man’s playground and justice is just a meaningless buzzword. >
  
  Then why the fuck is the bloated scrotum still waddling free? >
  
  Only in America can you call storming the Capitol to steal the election a “rally”. Calling it a riot is bad enough, but a rally makes it sound legitimate. Politico is spreading fake news. >
  
  Even just "everybody march to the capitol" is organizing an illegal gathering without a permit. It's as simple as that. Every other major protest or public event has to have permits and appropriate security in place. So calling on people to march to the capitol, without obtaining a permit or providing security, that's a crime in itself. And whatever happens during the commission of that crime, the organizer is liable for. The organizer became Donald Trump the moment he said the words. >
  
  I honestly don’t understand why they keep talking about this, his tax returns, and the fbi raiding the morons golf club, yet do nothing? He’s almost 80, just arrest him! >
  
  Need a solid case before doing it. There’s a lot rising on the outcome of this. This is too big of a deal to jump the gun and not come as prepared as the prosecution could possibly be. One side will be angry at the end of this for sure, but what that means for the country seems like it’ll be determined by the losing side. >
  
  Is there anyone who honestly thinks Trump was somehow in legal possession of government documents and classified information? Imagine if instead of documents it was something else illegal to posses like drugs or guns. Is there any chance the FBI would just take them and allow the suspect to just walk around free while they "build a case"? >
  
  He was president, it’s totally plausible. I’d think of it more like busting a major drug ring. They have knowledge of the crimes but let it continue while they build the case. If they jump the gun too soon, they could end up missing vital people or other information that could lead to a bigger bust that would get more drugs and more people off the streets. If you’ve noticed, they haven’t been solely looking at Trump, plenty of other people are potentially going down with him. The goal shouldn’t be just taking down him only, it should be to imprison any person part of this crap. >
  
  Suggests. Suggests? Suggests?! >
  
  He will be indicted ..A lot of people are going to be upset but this is a case of ( This person whether he was the President or Congressman or Average Citizen must be held accountable for this travesty.) What kind of an example would US be if we didn't enforce laws against any attack on our Democracy. >
  
  What happens to an individual who stands up on a plane and falsely screams that there is a bomb on the plane? Trump has done the same thing and should be punished accordingly. >
  
  Suggests? >
  
  “Suggests”. How cute. >
  
  Well ya. Good golly it isn't that hard to connect the crazy 😜 >
  
  I am tired of hearing about this stuff. When will Garland get moving. He’s had 2 years and only recently started to investigate. I think he was going to ignore it until the January 6 committee went public. They embarrassed him into starting an investigation because there is a two tier Justice system in the country.
  Sorry. A bit of a rant. >
  
  When using the words "Trump" and "the law," basically you can separate them with "broke" or "doesn't understand." >
  
  Like this shit didn’t happen in real fucking time via twitter over a couple months. Jesus Christ! >
  
  F.U. We knew this two years ago when that chalatan dumpster fire commanded his sheeple on live TV >
  
  If you commit crimes in someone’s name it’s still your crime. >
  
  Wow I called it. As soon as a I saw the insurection, IDK what it was but I could just tell it was Trumps fault. Nobody else believed me but thankfully the J6 cmte investigated it for 2 years to uncover what I alone knew all along. Thankfully all the evidence is just coming out now and shocking everybody awake to the truth that Trump had something to do with it. 
  /S >
  
  Duh!!! >
  
  If Bin Laden not even claiming 9l/11 but praising it was enough to start two wars and a "war on terror" 
  Saying "Go ahead wage jihad my mujahadeen" like Trump did surely is rnough >
  
  “TwO mOrE wEeKs” >
  
  Scum Dems & their Scum Administration >
  
  Fuck The Scum Dems & their SCUM ADMINISTRATION 🖕