comment: >
  
  Everyone just needs to realize that the division is premeditated decisiveness. All this just to enrich themselves both sides is clearly robbing from the same cradle. One just wants everything to burn for everyone that don’t look like them because of where they are on the equator. It’s amazing if you think of humanity as what it is a spec on the cosmos. Love each other is all we got that separates us. Wish more people realized this. Life is what you make it.
context: What an annoying sack of skin. Please go home, nobody likes you Kerri. >
  
  Qari! >
  
  Qoward >
  
  That would be because Lake is beginning to experience the second step of the two-step process beginning with “Fuck around”. >
  
  
  The fact that Plaintiff failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence required for each element of (the law) does not equate to finding that her claims were, or were not, groundless and presented in bad faith
  
  OK. Fine, those two things don't equate. But you saying that two things don't equate doesn't mean that her claims weren't groundless and presented in bad faith.
  Trump failed to meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence in all his election fraud lawsuits, and that doesn't equate either. Except, you know, for the part where he presented those groundless claims in bad faith. >
  
  Right, this is a nicer version of "she's an idiot for believing this because there's no evidence, but she's just an idiot, not a liar."
  Though I feel like saying her claims aren't groundless while also saying there isn't any clear/convincing evidence seems odd. Pick one, but you can't have both. >
  
  Yeah, that's my thing. There are elements of her case that need to be proved in order for it to have a proper legal basis. As far as I can tell, she and her lawyers didn't even attempt to prove those elements. It's hard not to see that as bad faith. >
  
  "The Hill has reached out to Lake’s campaign for further comment."
  Please don't.  We're really not interested in anything she has to say. >
  
  i second this
  we need to force obscurity on a lot more of people >
  
  How can this person be considered a good candidate to lead in government when she cannot even control her impulses to make rude or aggressive "tweets" when things do not go her way? What kind of leader is that? There are high school teens with better self-control. >
  
  She wasn’t a good candidate. >
  
  I fucking hate that we're living in this world when it could be so awesome for all of us...we are really stupid animals. >
  
  Humanity needs a greater predator to become one. >
  
  I have hope we get lucky on ASI, otherwise we're probably fucked but whatever, we were all gonna die anyway.