comment: >
  
  
  If everyone agrees I'm broadly correct about everything and we just need to hammer out the details, I'd say that's broadly a win for me.
  
  No one has ever disagreed with you about anything? Not even brexit? Palestine?
context: To /u/Gravatona, Your post is under consideration for removal for violating Rule B.
  In our experience, the best conversations genuinely consider the other person’s perspective. Here are some techniques for keeping yourself honest:
  
  Instead of only looking for flaws in a comment, be sure to engage with the commenters’ strongest arguments — not just their weakest.
  Steelman rather than strawman. When summarizing someone’s points, look for the most reasonable interpretation of their words.
  Avoid moving the goalposts. Reread the claims in your OP or first comments and if you need to change to a new set of claims to continue arguing for your position, you might want to consider acknowledging the change in view with a delta before proceeding.
  Ask questions and really try to understand the other side, rather than trying to prove why they are wrong.
  
  Please also take a moment to review our Rule B guidelines and really ask yourself - am I exhibiting any of these behaviors? If so, see what you can do to get the discussion back on track.  Remember, the goal of CMV is to try and understand why others think differently than you do. >
  
  Everyone believes all their beliefs are correct. A person can't hold a belief they know to be wrong...
  What even is this post? >
  
  Okay, my point is that I'm probably wrong about something, so where am I wrong. But on this subreddit you have to present a point of view to be challenged. >
  
  You haven't presented enough of your viewpoints for anyone to adequately challenge them.
  Eg. "I'm pro drug decriminalization" - drug decriminalization can take infinite forms. Decriminalizing? Or Legalization? How, why, by what policy, phased or not, what to do about previous convicts, what to do about those currently in the legal system, is selling legalized, if so how, how does one get a permit to sell drugs for human consumption, is there an age limit/minimum age, does that vary by drug, what about drugs that can be used to kill other people easily eg. Fentanyl, and so on.
  It's just impossible to argue with a statement like "I'm pro drug legalization" because it's too complicated. You could get 1000 people who are 'in favor of drug legalization' in a room and each of them will have an entirely different set of answers to the who/what/when/where/why about it. >
  
  Sure, but if you think it's complicated then you probably think it's possible and good in some format.
  If someone says they are in favour of burning witches, or slavery, I'm not asking them for their detailed policy before I disagree.
  If everyone agrees I'm broadly correct about everything and we just need to hammer out the details, I'd say that's broadly a win for me.