comment: >
  
  
  Do I prioritize my own positive experiences over the rest ? Do I avoid negative experiences even if others get more in return ? Do I favorize the least absolute negative/positive for everyone even if I take more negative myself ?
  
  You answer those questions in accordance with your prefference, and your expected quality/intensity of experience. That may differ from person to person and situation to situation, but your still applying the same consistant worldview universally (for every person).
  I dont think there can be conflicting opinions in this sense, you cant prefer option A over B, while simultaniously prefering option B over A. Different people might simultaneosly preffer A or B, but i never argued that different people should come to the same conclusion on how it would be optimal to act. Claming such a thing would lead to an inconsistent worldview, imo.
context: /u/the_bollo (OP) has awarded 1 delta(s) in this post.
  All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
  Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
  ^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >
  
  In reality, the world is such a vast, complex, nuanced, and multi-faceted place that I can't think of a single view that could be easily and universally applied to every single scenario without any forethought.
  Honestly, if you don't run into some level of contradictory nuance or complexity in your view, it might be a sign you're being short-sighted or dogmatic. >
  
  I think its mostly an issue for worldviews that are inflexible and dont account for nuace in found in the world. I can think of a worldview something like this: "Each individual should act in accordance with their individual prefferences. They should maximize their positive experiences, and minimze negative experience to the best of their ability". I think this can be universally applied and doesnt run into contradictions. You might critizie it for being vague, and not prescribing specific actions, but such is the reality for worldviews that are consistant and universal. >
  
  That very "worldview" can be caracterized in many ways: Do I prioritize my own positive experiences over the rest ? Do I avoid negative experiences even if others get more in return ? Do I favorize the least absolute negative/positive for everyone even if I take more negative myself ?
  In a single worldview there are countless nuances, sometimes conflicting opinions. You can't find any global idea that everyone views the same except maybe for basic survival instincts and even those fail in humans