comment: >
  
  R/technicallythetruth
context: "Do I have the proof? I AM the proof!" >
  
  "Well, of course I know him. He's me" >
  
  But see, if I can cheat the system then that means anybody can so therefore they must have, that's the only way we lost?!?!
  This argument is so annoying and spreading everywhere, the idea that the fact a person lost is all the evidence needed to prove cheating.
  I wonder where that came from?  /s >
  
  I used the ring to destroy the ring >
  
  "Of course I have proof of voter fraud! I'm the proof with how many times I voted!"