comment: >
  
  No one can prevent Donald Trump from doing stupid things.
context: Simon & Schuster have been in business a long time.  I’m betting they know the rules before they release anything.  Just another frivolous lawsuit, because he’s getting low on cash. >
  
  Except he won't get any and would likely spend more if somehow it goes to trial if a judge doesn't toss it first. >
  
  In Trump’s mind, just filing the lawsuit satisfies his bullying needs.  He’s teaching them a lesson, even if it gets thrown out. >
  
  Which as a lawyer or a law firm, why you would represent this guy makes no sense. Won't win the lawsuit and he won't pay the bill either. >
  
  Famous client gets the law firm’s name in the news. >
  
  It's like those scammers that purposefully put bad English in scam emails. If somebody won't notice then they are likely an easy mark. 
  Same logic applies here. Despite trump winning or losing the legal group will get a bunch of easy marks attracted by the stench >
  
  It’s free advertising for the firm. >
  
  Hasn't he been declared incompetent yet? >
  
  I mean... more than half the voters said he was not competent. And his previous attorneys, friends, co-workers, family members, strangers that have watched him on TV, heads of state, cabinet appointees... A judge has decided neither he or his children are fit to run a charity, does that count? >
  
  I mean legally incompetent, where the court appoints a guardian so he doesn't do stupid things.