comment: >
  
  Wait til you see their plans for the booby, the titmouse, and the titpecker.
context: What a tit. >
  
  Maybe they should have tweeted more about Musk Ducks.  They live in Australia and actually eat other ducks. Here's a picture I found of one. >
  
  Can't have scientists & educators tweeting facts! Think about the children! >
  
  Twitter when it sees actual nazis tweeting about actual nazi shit: "This is fine."
  Twitter when it sees the word cock being used in its literal sense: "HOW DARE YOU?!" >
  
  To be fair, democracy is a direct threat to their business model. >
  
  They fixed this when they lost their first poll, after this one, only registered member ~~of the party~~ can vote >
  
  Its the “charity” part that Elon hates. >
  
  Charity for me, not for thee. -Elon >
  
  I had a gym teacher in middle school named Mr. Woodcock. No lie. He was such a mean SOB that we only made fun of his name at a safe distance >
  
  Have you heard the music of Bruce Cockburn? >
  
  No is it good? >
  
  I really like that. Thanks. I love a good acoustic guitar. >
  
  Luckily they weren't Tweeting about European Great Tits. >
  
  Elon sure does have some PEENT up emotions regarding charity. >
  
  Sounds like something Reddit would do >
  
  Arr, a woodcock is no laughing matter. I lost me flesh to a cannon fired by privateers to the Spanish crown and have been grateful they gave me a pegthirdleginstead of a hook. Yaharrr. >
  
  You’d think they’d have learned that a general list of “nono” strings would be a bad solution to the problem of identifying problematic language, especially on a multilingual platform. We ran into an issue identifying action statements where it said “managing director” was an action. Which it kind of is grammatically, but not in the broader context we worked in.