comment: >
  
  That would be AI.
context: This just in, company PR team drums up news articles with non-existent tech. 
  DontPay comes up in my google searches a lot. I don't find the advice particularly useful so assuming they already use AI to help research and write articles, having the realtime version cant be better. >
  
  It’d be a good head start for citing other cases, assuming AI doesn’t already do that. >
  
  It does. AI to help find cases at least >
  
  Any (scary) robot movie begins with the robot losing, and ends with the robot using what they learned in defeat to exploit human weaknesses. >
  
  They asked it “when did you stop beating your wife?” >
  
  The guy who runs it seems to be a fraud.  There's a good twitter thread with KathrynTewson (a  really good paralegal) who went through the DonotPay system to submit a few things to see what she would get.  Several of them never generated anything at all and the ones that did generate were obviously nothing more than filling out a template; no AI needed.
  She then got into it with the CEO, who banned her account after changing the terms of service.  While Kathryn exposed his lie and document forging in regards to making donations.
  ETA: DonotPay has since shut down its legal document AI services to focus on "consumer rights" >
  
  If anything was going to get sued to oblivion, it was a business that threatened the jobs of thousands of lawyers.  You're giving incentive to people to sue you who do that for a living. >
  
  the worst enemy one man can have is a retired (fired/out of job) lawyer. >
  
  Bored lawyer. >
  
  Whew!  Now that the threat of AI has been dealt with we can focus on....oh wait.
  Bottom line is we need UBI cos most workers are not going to be needed in the "nearer than you think" future.  AI and robotics are going to absolutely destroy the value of most labor. >
  
  Our robotnik masters will be most displeased by this attitude. Watch for cybernetic vengeance. Y'all have been warned. Have a nice day. 8-) >
  
  But these lawyers won't make a peep when robots replace other jobs... >
  
  They will if you pay them >
  
  Hella smart, hitting the power off button 5head >
  
  I mean, get the AI to pass the bar first, then try again >
  
  I still think AI has the potential to be a great boon for normal people who cant afford a lawyer for filling out paperwork and legal responses and the like >
  
  Lawyer is the prime job to be done by robots in the future. That's going to be an interesting power struggle as lawyers and large rich corporations fight against automation while the average person sits idly by as they're blasted by propaganda about how bad robot lawyer automation is.
  Wait, did I say power struggle? I meant massacre. >
  
  What I really want to see is AI taking elected official's jobs. I would actually prefer voting for a machine that can be manipulated by a single corporation or group instead of whoever pays the person the most money that election cycle. Sure, it'll be largely the same thing anyway but at least we won't have to pay for their retirement, security, travel expenses, housing, and medical crap anymore.
  In short, vote for my upcoming Republican AI. It'll be the easiest politician to simulate. >
  
  Do you even need an AI to simulate a Republican?
  Just have an algorithm trawl the net for whatever the most trending debates are and have it triple down on one side. Bam, instant culture war politics.