comment: >
  
  Kyrsten Cinema had GOP superpac money funneled through other pacs to her campaign. Remember that at the next tiebreaker vote.
context: Super PACs shouldnt be a thing period, but as long as they are its nigh suicidal (in reference fo election chances) to not use them when your opposition is, youre kneecapping yourself from the word go.
  Now if Citizens United could be overturned, and we passed some laws with actual teeth (that we actually enforced) to stop dark money flows, then we could do away with super pacs, but until then they are a necessary evil. >
  
  What opposition is using them during the primaries if the democratic party bans their use? >
  
  The problem is what comes after the primary: a general election they'll be moving onto without having established a war chest. >
  
  Super PACs could still solicit donations, they just wouldn't be able to spend them until the general. >
  
  Imagine having all this extra money to spend in the Generals… >
  
  Or, you know, #End Citizens united >
  
  He's right. >
  
  So Bernie still doesn't know how Super PACs work? The DNC can't ban Super PAC spending. If a Super PAC wants to buy a pro-Bernie or anti-Bernie ad during the primary season, then that's their right under current law, and there's nothing the DNC can do to stop it. >
  
  He knows perfectly well what he's doing. >
  
  An absolutely fabulous idea that will never be done