comment: >
  
  my god you are right, it was the other way around, they weren't killed by the snap in the comics (scarlet witch and spiderman still died vs. thanos tho), my bad.
  I'm not sure about dr. strange at this point, I might have to read it again since it's bugging me now.
context: I don't care that it's not source material accurate. I'm just bored by how formulaic and family friendly it is. They're just live action Saturday morning cartoons.
  I rewatched Blade recently and thought, "Why don't they make superhero movies like this anymore?" And then I remembered Disney likes money. Family friendly, general audience products bring in maximum cash. >
  
  Even blade was toned down, the comics are way more gory iirc if I remember but I get your point. >
  
  As someone who enjoys the MCU but isn't very well versed in the comics, what are the most egregious deviations from the comics that upset you? >
  
  Here a couple examples
  Comics: adam warlock was basically the most important character vs. thanos
  Movies: he didn't even show up IIRC
  Comics: there is no time travel, after the snap it goes right into endgame
  Movies: dragging out the story with time travel which they could've introduced adam warlock but never did it.
  Comics: Thanos beats all the cosmic entities (Living Tribunal, Eternity, Galactus etc.)
  Movies: None of that happened here and it was a peak moment in the comics
  Comics: the snap killed major characters like Doctor Strange, Scarlet Witch, and spiderman, so only captain america, thor and iron man would face thanos
  Movies: seemingly only side characters die from it, which makes it way less dramatic
  There is only 1 thing that they actually managed to upgrade imo and that is thanos's motivation, he's a way more interesting villain in the movies considering he doesn't just impress mistress death because he has a crush on her, he's more complex >
  
  The snap killed all 3 of those people in the movies, what are you smoking