comment: >
  
  
  My proposal is no religion. I think it should be outlawed, or at the very least, discouraged and banned from politics, business, and pretty much anywhere other than your own home.
  
  That's not "no religion", that's "no religion in public". Also, in the age of post-lockdown, "at home" includes work, church services, funerals, classes, hangouts, and city council meetings. So all of the places you don't want religion, it'll be there.
context: How exactly do you outlaw an idea?
  Gonna start throwing people on concentration camps if you catch them praying?
  Gonna start burning bibles? >
  
  
  Gonna start throwing people on concentration camps if you catch them praying?
  
  I see what you're doing there. No.
  I haven't planned out a whole legal system, but a quick idea is: the first step would just be to remove it from all politics, education systems, businesses, news and most TV channels of any kind, etc, and to shut down churches.
  Afterwards, it would be heavily discouraged, but allowed inside home. Outside home (group gatherings, door-to-door, trying to convert people on the street or something) would be given a warning first, then a day or two in a special rehabilitation center (they could leave any time they like after a session or two, it's not forcing them, and it works as free therapy), and if it continues, stricter schedules with a rehabilitation center.
  
  Gonna start burning bibles?
  
  No, that would just fuel it because it gives religious people a clearly hostile enemy that will be the center of media hate. >
  
  ugh, it’s scary there are people that even think like you lol >
  
  I honestly do not understand why I am being downvoted.
  It is a simple draft of an idea of how it could be enforced.
  It also doesn't harm anyone, and confines them much less than most criminal punishments.
  I thought it was a very good solution because it would be what most people consider moral.
  I'm not an expert on morals, though.
  What was wrong with it? (genuinely asking) >
  
  You're being down voted because your solution is fascist in nature and down right scary. >
  
  Why?
  Like I said, I tried to make it as moral as possible.
  I think it would benefit humanity/ >
  
  Doesn't matter if you give them board games and a pool table. It's still a re-education camp where they can't leave and there movements are monitored. Can't you see the possibility of abuses there? 
  
  I think it would benefit humanity/
  
  Cool. A lot of shitty people thought throwing all Asians on the west coast in the 40s was a positive for everyone as well.