comment: >
  
  Sadly, in Missouri and Florida, they are forcing a dress code for legislators.
context: That sounds completely unconstitutional >
  
  Maybe, but do you think the current SCOTUS will agree?
  When they overturned Roe, Thomas indicated that the SCOTUS rulings that currently prohibit states from banning gay marriage, "sodomy", and contraceptives may also be reconsidered.
  I really wouldn't count on this court ruling that any laws attacking sex and gender minorities are "unconstitutional". >
  
  The difference between those rules and this law, is this law criminalizes literal "performances". Performances are literally speech and that's explicitly protected (unlike the things you mentioned). There's no way that SCOTUS would say otherwise.
  If they were to uphold the law, they'd likely argue that the state has a legitimate interest in limiting these performances. >
  
  
  Performances are literally speech and that's explicitly protected
  
  This is how it will fall down. Speech is not just words, but everything together. I would like to see how they contort themselves around this issue >
  
  The conservatives will argue its obscenity. >
  
  We really are back to McCarthyism, I’m starting to see the word “pornography” used for anything the person doesn’t like more and more on the right. I know it when I see it 🙄 >
  
  How about we ban religious services on public property too? >
  
  Please >
  
  Drag shows have been around forever. Why is the GQP suddenly all riled up about it? I'm out of the loop. >
  
  Republicans need to keep outrage stoked
  Their latest thing is the groomer panic
  Instead of actually working harder to solve rapes and curb child abuse, they're doing this. >
  
  There seems to be a new moral panic every 6 months.  Oh, and a migrant horde approaching the US borders every election year. >
  
  Of course. 
  The day Tucker goes on air and says "Things are GREAT thus week. We won and it's all looking up!" is the week his ratings plummet 98%
  Fury and grievance get eyeballs, clicks, and votes. >
  
  This is all media and politics lol >
  
  Plenty of media that isn’t remotely like the utter bs that is Fox >
  
  "Plenty" uh huh. We will have to agree to disagree. >
  
  Lol. I'm sure it's rigorous and without flaw. Im sure the people who made it were objective and not incentivied to pander to social science publishers and editors at all. Oh its Behind an academic publicizing paywall there professor. 
  This reminds me of college...maybe I should shut up, eat my Ramen, and not question why I am paying the university 150k for the privilege of learning shit like this that has no bearing on a career. >
  
  Maybe look at the chart? >
  
  Interesting. A dress code on public property? Does that include the legislators themselves when they are in session?