comment: >
  
  Yet she apologised for some of them
context: The reason that McCarthy gave for not removing Santos was because the voters in his district voted him in office. Can’t that be said for all the other House of Representatives. Rep.Omar voters voted her into office. Her voters have a right to have her on committees. Just like Rep. Swalwell & Rep. Schiff voters voted then into office. >
  
  Yea but they voted Democrat so their votes don't count! >
  
  That’s right I forgot >
  
  Republicans just can’t find any discipline over their worst impulses. I assume this is part of the secret Republican 3-page deal that allowed Kevin McCarthy to squeak into the Speakership. Sad. >
  
  Don't worry, it's not racist if you make up reasons. >
  
  That’s the problem. If those reasons are not simple enough for their voters to get and understand the underlying racism, they’ll call them out for not being racist enough. >
  
  Eh, I don't think the GOP can go wrong with their base on this issue. Their voters may not be the most cerebral bunch, but they definitely understand the process of making up bullshit to hurt brown skinned people. The facade doesn't matter to them. They know why Omar is being punished. >
  
  But the “Jewish space lasers” lady MTG can serve on committees? >
  
  Because she is the "right religion" >
  
  And color >
  
  At least we will see how many drooling maga's we have in the house.  It's useful for that anyways..... >
  
  Oh we actually already have that number it’s 222 with maybe 6-8 that will feign morality in this vote. >
  
  I’m assuming he wouldn’t call a vote on this unless he had the votes. Am I wrong? >
  
  Question: Does the House GOP assume that House Democrats won’t remove Republicans from all their committee appointments in retaliation when they regain control, assume that the Democrats will never regain control or simply have no vision for beyond today? >
  
  Yes, they do assume that. They're banking on Democrats trying to keep decorum and civility and play the long established rules and not just let the whole thing fall into non-stop partisan bickering.
  Therefore, they can act like petulant children all they want without fear of any sort of retribution or consequences. >
  
  Or maybe this is in response to democrats doing the same to republicans >
  
  Removing people with obvious conflicts of interest? >
  
  Similar to removing an anti Semitic woman from a committee with foreign affairs. Seems like a conflict of interest also. So this is justified >
  
  Her “antisemitic” comments are debatable.