comment: >
  
  The snap killed all 3 of those people in the movies, what are you smoking
context: I don't care that it's not source material accurate. I'm just bored by how formulaic and family friendly it is. They're just live action Saturday morning cartoons.
  I rewatched Blade recently and thought, "Why don't they make superhero movies like this anymore?" And then I remembered Disney likes money. Family friendly, general audience products bring in maximum cash. >
  
  Even blade was toned down, the comics are way more gory iirc if I remember but I get your point. >
  
  As someone who enjoys the MCU but isn't very well versed in the comics, what are the most egregious deviations from the comics that upset you? >
  
  Here a couple examples
  Comics: adam warlock was basically the most important character vs. thanos
  Movies: he didn't even show up IIRC
  Comics: there is no time travel, after the snap it goes right into endgame
  Movies: dragging out the story with time travel which they could've introduced adam warlock but never did it.
  Comics: Thanos beats all the cosmic entities (Living Tribunal, Eternity, Galactus etc.)
  Movies: None of that happened here and it was a peak moment in the comics
  Comics: the snap killed major characters like Doctor Strange, Scarlet Witch, and spiderman, so only captain america, thor and iron man would face thanos
  Movies: seemingly only side characters die from it, which makes it way less dramatic
  There is only 1 thing that they actually managed to upgrade imo and that is thanos's motivation, he's a way more interesting villain in the movies considering he doesn't just impress mistress death because he has a crush on her, he's more complex