comment: >
  
  Except there’s no convincing evidence they have been misused. I’m sure some has, but to what degree is completely unknown. Could be insignificant or could be significant. What you’re working with is assumption, which is worth a lot less than this report.
context: This is absolutely hilarious.
  You're letting a man who was prominent in the Panama papers, who fired the person investigating him, lead an investigation into where our money is going. >
  
  I assume you're referring to Viktor Shokin? >
  
  You heard em folks, the government said they didn't do anything wrong. Case closed. >
  
  I mean they would be the ones to know. US AID to Ukraine is tracked decently well. >
  
  They'd also be the ones to lie and cover it up if some of the funds are being misappropriated. It's a proxy war. American money fights American enemy using Ukrainian cannon fodder. If Americans find out some of the money isn't being used in the right way then support for Ukraine wanes and the US gov't finds it more difficult to fund their proxy war.