>

European Union is second biggest supporter of Ukraine,  UK third, Germany fourth, France sixth, Norway 7th and Netherlands 8th.
All countries not included in your new alliance, the break that you suggest is exactly the goal of Russians.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 88%. (I'm a bot)


Ambassador Vadym Prystaiko, who has previously served as Ukraine's foreign minister, ambassador to Canada, and representative at NATO in Brussels, told Newsweek in an interview at Kyiv's embassy in London that NATO's deep support for, and growing collaboration with Ukraine means it is "Logical" that his nation would join the transatlantic alliance.
Ukraine has long sought NATO membership, having been denied a Membership Action Plan-a key step on the way to accession-at the alliance summit in Bucharest in 2008.
"The leaders of NATO and the U.S. should say: 'You're fighting, you are courageously doing that, you will lose many of yours. But hey, the EU and NATO are waiting for you. Just finish up with this work. Do whatever is needed.'".


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: NATO^#1 Ukraine^#2 alliance^#3 membership^#4 member^#5 >

Trump got very few things right. His take on the dysfunction of NATO was one of his successes. A new alliance needs to be considered. Certain large European democracies are not dependable in a true scrape. >

It should be the US, Canada, the Eastern European NATO members and Ukraine, Japan, South Korea, and Australia.