>

Trump is using the false equivalence narrative to the fullest
Biden's lawyers found the documents and alerted the national archives.
Trump was asked to return classified documents by the national archives, and refused. Instead he sued to obstruct. Then continually lied about having more documents.. >

He still has some. >

Yep, Trump's lawyers don't even believe him and hired more people to find any remaining ones he took. >

Seems pretty obvious but, I guess we gotta break out the crayons for the Fox News crowd. >

Well CNN is also trying to pump this up so they can say “See! We do both sides!!” >

New CEO is so fucking thirsty for the old idiot ratings group. >

It's all they have left...sort of like AM radio after FM went pretty much all music. Music left AM and now caters to a mostly older male conservatuve crowd...mostly.  
Who under 30-40 watches CNN on cable? >

30 is not old like if you are 30 you still have more than half your life infront of you 40 is where you start to get old. >

Right so people who are older than 30-40 range are the ones most likely to still watch CNN on cable. Never said 30 was old, but it's not like they are teens or in their twenties either. >

I am wiling to bet that the documents found have a record at the national archives as being sent to him for research and that they forgot to return them. 
Lets watch this play out... >

They also seem to not understand that Trump wasn't raided by the FBI because he had classified documents. He was raided because he refused to return them after the national archives contacted them multiple times with list of documents they knew he had. The raid was the only option left to retrieve back the docs. >

And the “raid” was the execution of a search warrant issued by the courts, based on probable cause that the documents were still being held there illegally. 
Calling it a raid makes it sound like some rogue infiltration of his home. More right wing language spin. >

The Rebublicans are going to use this Biden document snafu as a weapon.  I just know it.
Sigh.
Republican impeachment attempt against Biden number one incoming in 3 ... 2 ... 1. >

Fox is already trying to spin it as "the media is downplaying this" while completely disregarding a multitude of factors that make this a non-issue. >

For starters, TFG's stolen confidential/secret docs allegedly got multiple CIA informants/operatives tortured and killed.
So much so that the CIA issued a memo concerning the extremely high amount of them being tortured/killed and they couldn't figure out how they were being outted.  
Now we know. >

I mean, it could have been anyone who had access to the full 'compartmentalized' list of intelligence assets in Russia.  Also Trump requested such a list a few days after meeting with Putin.  But who knows how they got it? /s >

They found some.  They weren't aware they were there.  They notified the National Archives.  They will return them.
Trump TOOK the documents.  He KNEW he had them.  The National Archives KNEW he had them.  They LIED and said they gave them all back.  The National Archives FOUND documents STILL MISSING.  THEY HAD TO GO TO MAR-A-LARGO AND RETRIEVE THEM!!!! FROM A STORAGE GARAGE AND HIS DESK, MIXED WITH MAGAZINES AND DRECK. 
There's a difference, I believe.