>

But it's not special treatment, per se.
The comments were correct.
There may be many reasons to conclude the man is disqualified in the sense that he is incompetent and not fit for the position.
But it's not so easy to wave your arms and declare the 14th amendment applies to Trump.  It's easy to say it should!  But there's nothing else clear about how to apply the 14th.  Even conviction of sedition might not be enough.  It may take Congress passing a resolution after (or instead of) this.  Thing is... we just don't know and it'd have to fought in the courts to get them to rule on what to do here.  It's a mess.
The remark about impeachment is on target as well.  That's about the only clear way Trump could be disqualified since the Senate can declare Trump may never hold this office again when convicting via impeachment.  This could in theory be done even now.  It just cannot in practice because the GOP House won't impeach and there's still nowhere near the level of support required in the Senate.
All of this... is not special treatment.  It's more reflective of how messed up things are in general.
No, he is not, and unless he is convicted of sedition or impeached (again) and held accountable in the appropriate way, he can actually run and become potus while in jail, if only convicted of incitement and/or election interference. >

It fascinates me how hard people try to look the other way and give him special treatment. So much video and audio but..