>

I think I've had my fill of Prince Harry stories for 2023. I'm sorry you got treated like shit Harry and Meghan, but other people have family trouble too.
To be honest, all of this drama has made the royals quite relatable. >

I feel like all his whining and tell all stuff is working against him. We all know the royal family as an institution is a fucked up one from of weird things and traditions which rule their (very privileged) lives. So nothing he says is really a surprise but you do feel like "all right bud, stop being the guy who complains about his having constantly". He wanted out, fair enough, he actually got the best walk away he could with the expected mud slinging from the press but not the family. Had he just gone Scott whatever business he wanted to in the States he'd have been chip shop paper within a few months. I feel like he's been advised by a US pr firm who have gone the very American way of saying attack first and get your story in first. Except the people who really care are British and that way if dealing with it versus the stoic silence of the total family just doesn't work. 
He was the royal everyone loved, the silly second in line, did done stupid stuff but a nice guy. Fair play to the team at Buckingham palace because it's becoming fairly clear that's really not all he's about at all. >

He moved to Canada. When he couldn't hack it there he moved to the US, but his first choice was Canada. >

I mean the documentary showed his family being constantly harassed in Canada on that island. They didn't leave for no reason. Also Meghan is American so it's not a stretch for them to move to the US. >

There is so much undeserved hate for them and I completely believe Camilla is behind the leaks. Her friends are trashing Meghan in the media. She's not even trying to hide it >

You'd have to work out why that makes sense though, give all the hurt this is causing Charles it really doesn't make sense for Camilla to go after them. It does help Harry's narrative that his mum was the Saint and everyone else is the bad guy except him and Meghan though for that to seem plausible. >

Jeremy Clarkson is the latest celebrity to be seen in public getting chummy with Camilla before releasing a statement saying he can't wait for the day Meghan Markle is stripped naked and marched through the streets while people throw feces at her and shout SHAME! This is just the latest example of Camilla being nasty and sneaky. It reminds me of when Diana said Camilla went into her private rooms and left a taunting note. Basically :Camilla was here! Fucking your husband.  That woman is a lowly snake and all of this media circus smacks of racism, sexism, classism and xenophobic rage wrapped in one Royal Patriarchal package. >

Does the kool aid taste nice? >

I wouldn't know but how does Camilla's ass taste since you've got your head ALL THE WAY UP THERE? You loyal Royal defenders certainly hate when the facts aren't in your favor. Clarkson was seen with Camilla, FACT. He said deplorable things about Meghan, FACT. Backlash caused him to retract his statement, FACT. Camilla has been promiscuous and underhanded since the 1980's FACT. >

Your tears for your fallen God are tasty. Did you know that Diana dumped all of her charities the moment she got divorced and only kept a small percentage that she was advised would give her the most beneficial PR and attention? 
The royal family is full of shitty people, that doesn't make you right. That you think Diana wasn't a shitty person and that anything bad must be the result of Machiavellian schemes by anyone inside it really is the only evidence needed to show who has the loose grip on reality. >

I know more about Prince Harry to last me a lifetime.Thanks to Prince Harry. >

.. And yet he talks about valuing his privacy. >

His privacy is the thing he has of value, so he’s trading it for cash. They’ve been cut off and need to pay the bills somehow. >

Someone's got issues with his step mom >

i mean, I dont blame him tbh after the Diana stuff? I was only a kid but remember thinking it was pretty fcked up >

It's fucked up that Charles was in love with Somone and was told that he could not be with her because she was divorced and so forced him to marry someone else. Everyone got a bad deal here. >

She couldn't give him children. His parents required him to have children which is why he found someone so young. He never stopped seeing Camilla during his marriage. Diana was just the womb he needed to please his family. >

She could give him children. She gave her husband children after Charles married Diana. She wasn't a virgin, THAT and the Queen didn't like her were the issues. >

Yeah, they made it very clear he had to marry a virgin, which is so completely fucked up. Especially when uncle Dickie told him to play the field before he settled down. >

Uncle Dickie was screwing children as young as 9.  Charles greatly admired him. >

Is that for sure? or a rumor? No wonder he got assassinated. >

It is pretty well known.  He had a lot of security.  I have no doubt the Queen was aware of his proclivity.   He had a partner, Jimmy Saville.  This went on for years and years.  The saddest part is most the boys were orphans in a day and age where money meant everything. >

That's disgusting. Did the Queen suffer from some sort of in-bred brain malfunction? 
Why is there even a monarchy at all?
Think about it. >

If were advising Harry on his media strategy, I'd tell him to shut up and go away for a while. He's suffering from overexposure at this point and I am afraid he is doing real damage to his reputation. >

“Afraid” he’s doing damage to his rep? Let’s hope he does enough damage so he goes away permanently. That’s his whole wish isn’t it? To be a regular person not in the public eye? So do it already. Everyone in the world will be better for it. >

He never said he didn’t want to be in the public eye. He said he no longer wanted to participate in the Royal way of handling the media. >

Stop parroting tabloid lies from that Netflix doc >

I remember their statement when it happened. They went into detail about not wanting to deal with the Royal Rota. >

Yes they wanted to go someplace else and serve the queen which translated to “we don’t want the duty and responsibilities of work or responsibility. We want to be full paid glamorous royals living the life of celebrity and perks outside”
And they got it. They just couldn’t get pay and how they are livid. >

Harry: “She leaks stuff to media.” 
Also Harry: I am writing tell all-books, making tell-all docuseries and doing tell-all interviews! >

There's a difference between covertly leaking something and openly stating something I would say. >

I don't know about you but I much prefer a name or face behind the words. >

What? That's what I am saying. >

Okay my bad >

Np, is it worded that ambiguously? I initially gained a lot of downvotes too.
I'm german so I can't tell. Seems very clear to me what my take on it is I would've thought. >

Who cares, man. Why are we giving a flying anything about these people? They are Kardasians with titles. >

If you're british they have all kinds of power and influence, own 1000s of acres, over-rule and change the laws to their benefit, pay fa tax but receive shit loads of state aid and something like £10 million per year. >

That must be so grating.