>

Let's not even give that much lee way here. I, personally, cannot understand why Trump had nuclear and CIA secrets at his private residence that had already had multiple security incidents during his presidency.
But who are we kidding. This is it. It's being talked about. Diversion successful I suppose.
10 documents Biden's lawyers notified DOJ and the National Archive of and handed over. Verses 325 documents DOJ and the National Archive had to notify Trump's lawyers of and then Trump refused to return.
The only similarity here is that documents are involved. The amount of documents, cooperation with DOJ & Archive, and return of the documents is all different. >

From when he was VP. That means he’s had the documents for a decade. >

Having documents isn't the crime Trump is accused of. Refusing to return documents and obstructing efforts to retrieve documents is the crime Trump is accused of. >

I’m not talking about trump. I’m talking about Biden. How do you forget for a decade that you have classified documents just lying around? >

I know. My point is having the documents isn't a crime. There is no double standard here. Had Trump turned his documents over when the National Archive asked there wouldn't have been a raid at Mar-a-logo. >

Weird cause it would def be a crime if I brought my work home and there was big red letters saying secret on top >

“Makes available to an unauthorized person” bringing home classified documents is for sure in that category, you think hunter Biden has a TS clearance? >

I can even understand that Trump had documents.
It's the fact that he was so hellbent on not giving them back, wasn't cooperative, and lied about having them