>

I've heard some lawyers explain why of all of his cases this would be the most difficult to prosecute. Think about it. He didn't say "produce" the votes, he didn't say "or else I will... " He didn't say "if you do this for me I will do x for you." Just find the votes, and any half competent lawyer would defend how there have been audits, recounts, discovered uncounted ballots and other scenarios where vote totals have changed one way or another. Not a lot but it's all you need. 
In no way defending trump, he is a piece of garbage human being and president. But this would be an easy case to defend.
When should we expect an announcement on charges vs no charges >

When Willis decides to indict she’ll need to seat a regular grand jury. If you see anything that says she’s got a regular grand jury in place it won’t be long after that. >

The special grand jury wants to publish its special presentment too. This is getting juicy. Thanks Georgia! >

Time to buy stock in Orville Redenbacher >

There was a made for tv movie from back in the 80s called The Day After (not to be confused with the always delightful Day After Tomorrow). It showed the consequences of a nuclear war on “average” Americans. 
I remember the Rush Limbaugh equivalents among Reagan’s cheer squad pointing out that one of the sponsors of the show was Orville Red-enbacher. 
I was like eight and I still did a Liz Lemon quality eye roll. >

I always thought that "The Day After Tomorrow" was a sequel to "The Day After", I recall someone saying it on TV, but as I can find no evidence, I must be wrong. >

No, it was a nuclear war movie. I can’t remember the director/producer, but I think the Reagan crowd called them a communist or com-symp. 
If you want to see a really good take on that genre of movie, try finding a film called Miracle Mile. >


Fulton County Judge Robert McBurney [...] has scheduled a hearing for Jan. 24 that will address what portions, if any, of that report will be released to the public.
A court filing says that the grand jury voted to recommend that its report be published.

Oooh, this could be fun! >

Why does it take so long though? Like the reports done, why do we have to wait another 2 weeks just to announce what will actually be released? >

More than likely because the judge makes that decision, and he has other cases on his schedule. >

Which is crazy because can't you fast track cases and make them higher priority over another? If so, I couldn't imagine a case taking higher priority in the state of Georgia under that judge's caseload. >

I'm totally talking out of my butthole here, but I would think giving some kind of special treatment towards the case could indicate potential special treatment for one party over another. No doubt Trump's side wants it to drag on as long as possible. The judge is supposed to be an impartial referee, and it'll be a tough sell that 2 more weeks will have any material impact. >

Conversely, two weeks isn't a lot of time to review and discuss things this large.
I've spent two months discussing a specific piece of HVAC equipment with engineers and owners and suppliers.
Two weeks seems like an appropriate rate to get everything in order, review what needs to be done, prepare whats coming next, and then announce.
Saying this now - anything but full release is skullduggery >

I’ve spent 11 months on a 30-second commercial. Meetings, phone calls, more meetings. It’s still not written. >

"This product or service is great! You should buy it!" 
Solved. >

I’m not sure “great” is the word we want, it evokes colonial notions of superiority.  I think we need to focus-group this whole section.
And… isn’t “should” a bit too strong?  Can we try a softer word?  Or maybe a stronger word.  “Must?”  “Might?”  I’ll run it by my people.
Also what colour is the font going to be?  Here’s 20 pages of brand identity rules. >

This is so spot on. :) >

was this the thing where he committed election fraud and it was recorded and the whole world heard it and the republicans still want him to be president?  he's committed so many other crimes i almost forgot about this one.  busy guy. >

If he does not face charges and or jail, with regards to this blatant and obvious attempt, to interfere in an election...then the entire Justice system is a farce....