>

If only they had some of this evidence we've been promised for SIX YEARS! But we don't. There must not be any.
No, he is not, and unless he is convicted of sedition or impeached (again) and held accountable in the appropriate way, he can actually run and become potus while in jail, if only convicted of incitement and/or election interference. >

It fascinates me how hard people try to look the other way and give him special treatment. So much video and audio but.. >

But it's not special treatment, per se.
The comments were correct.
There may be many reasons to conclude the man is disqualified in the sense that he is incompetent and not fit for the position.
But it's not so easy to wave your arms and declare the 14th amendment applies to Trump.  It's easy to say it should!  But there's nothing else clear about how to apply the 14th.  Even conviction of sedition might not be enough.  It may take Congress passing a resolution after (or instead of) this.  Thing is... we just don't know and it'd have to fought in the courts to get them to rule on what to do here.  It's a mess.
The remark about impeachment is on target as well.  That's about the only clear way Trump could be disqualified since the Senate can declare Trump may never hold this office again when convicting via impeachment.  This could in theory be done even now.  It just cannot in practice because the GOP House won't impeach and there's still nowhere near the level of support required in the Senate.
All of this... is not special treatment.  It's more reflective of how messed up things are in general. >

I would think it is definitely special treatment, for a reason.
Any person doing things like he has would be indicted post-haste. His situation is only different because of politics and how it would look if we elected someone who was committing crimes, the reduction in electoral faith, with a side bonus for the dnc that they have their ultimate get out the vote anti-candidate, something they literally paid for in years prior to Trump and subsequent trumpian candidates. They only need to let them cause trouble, while pointing out that any inaction is solely an issue by gop.
That said, I think the lack of action does far worse overall. You want to give people a lack of faith, this is how you do it. If I were the gop, I'd call them on it, stand aside and say "have at it". >

The Speakership debacle did what it was supposed to do.  It kept the media focused of the House fracas and kept the attempted coup by Trump and his administration on January 6th, 2022 off the top newstories lists. >

What does that have to do with anything? The investigation and likely prosecution is all still happening. >

Remember, the founding fathers believed that  giving the “people” the power would be sufficient to protect  and save the republic from evil presidents. They believed then that  a man’s word was an emblem of honor. What they did not foresee is what is happening today. Millions of  the electorates  have become fanatics and have accepted lies, intimidation, greed, and corruption  as glorified honor. In essence, “We the People” has lost its purpose because millions  of Americans not only have  relented their power to crooked politicians but also have become conspirators in the destruction of the republic. >

Hence the reason why George Washington spoke out about political parties.
They shouldn't exist and they only abuse the trust of the people by making it so that the options are limited at their discretion.
Sure, we have third parties, but not a single one can make it to the federal level due to the "wasted vote" ideology the duopoly pushes. If people would stop voting against the other team and started looking up who is on the ballot rather than what team they want to win, things would be insanely different and that 30% legeslation pass no matter public perception for/against would start changing. >

You’d think people wouldn’t vote against their own interests, yet here we are >

It sucks that people know too little or nothing about psychopathy and narcissism. I tautly believe that we would have a better country if people knew how to identify, but that might just make the sneakier people make it through. >

He’s not going to win anyway >

The sad truth is, it's actually possible he can.
I'm willing to bet not many people even knew there was a libertarian candidat on every ballot who was nowhere near as divisive or ancient as either of the two running. >

You’re right. 
I’m disappointed after the mid terms. Shits real bad and they voted them right back in.
Discouraging. >

That's the way it works... sheep to the slaughter.
It's sad that there will likely be a second sedition wave in a few years. Not one derived out the mind of a lunatic in the pursuit of ego/power, rather, one born of those with no political affiliation trying to fix the problem of a corrupt system, hopefully without the violence.
...mostly on the back of so many people becoming aware of just how poorly represented we are and that others will continue the status quo until the cage is rattled. >

Probably right as well. Could come from either side at this point. >

Buts he's not >

Trumpqueda together is funny lol >

This.
So much this. >

"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?"
Democrats and 10 Republicans voted to impeach. 57 senators voted "guilty". They proved plenty, including that Republican elected officials care more about their immediate power than they do about the country.