>

I guess I do think roles should be defined and followed as “masculine” and “feminine”, but my thoughts are it shouldn’t matter what someone’s assigned gender at birth was or what their biological sex is.
If it works for you, then I won't knock it. For me, however, I think I'd hate being a stay-at-home mom because of the lack of adult social interaction. Also, if I make my own money, then I won't be SOL if me or my partner wants to leave or if he dies or something. >

I have a very large life insurance policy and no prenup so I think my wife is set if I die or our marriage ends. >

I dont think a lot of people could live with only one salary per household in this economy. If it’s working for you then great. 
Also personally of course I work because I need money but I also love what I do and I feel that it kinda give me purpose and I can feel useful for society. Being at home every single day only cleaning etc would get boring really fast in my opinion. Also atm with all the business closing because they lack staff would be even worst if you remove half of the work force to make them stay at home >

If you don’t think it matters what gender is where what you are talking about isn’t actually “traditional”. You’re just saying it’s optimal if both parties don’t need to work full time. Which I fully agree it’s nice to prioritize the children and the home. Good idea bad phrasing.