>

Does this mean we keep the good congressional maps for PA?
This is for Pennsylvania.  It’s mentioned on the 6th paragraph >

It's a Pittsburgh paper, not necessarily meant for National consumption, which is why I don't think they felt the need to specify. >

Mention of PA in Reddit headline would help imo >

Rule 11.
Not disagreeing, it would help clarify things.  But the post would also get trashed because of it. >

Now let's do the senate next! This state has allowed the GOP to control it for too long.
At least they can't force an abortion amendment onto the spring primary ticket now. >


• McAndrew beat Walker 9,515 votes (about 75%) to 3,185 (about 25%).
• With all but one precinct reporting, Salisbury collected 10,068 votes (87%) to Pagane’s 1,406 (12%).
• Gergely led Nevills 6,705 (73%) to 2,282 (about 25%) with 98% of precincts reported.

This was not entirely unexpected, but the result of gaining control of the state House because of it is a big deal.
In Pennsylvania, if two consecutive sessions of the state legislature approve of a constitutional amendment, it can be put on the ballot for the people. Republicans have been using this to put important constitutional amendments in the hands of off-year primary voters, in a closed primary state. This will at least cause an impending anti-abortion amendment to start from scratch in two years.