>

To be fair, you're both correct. Both this last cycle and the next, things were unfavorable for the democrats, but in different ways. In 22, it was the outside factors surrounding the election. Inflation, gas prices, bidens approval rating, that sort of shit. But the seats that were up for election were favorable to the democrats. In 24, there are more seats in safer red states, which is an entirely different can of worms to overcome. Coupled with the fact that they are going to have few, if any, legislative accomplishments thanks to the republicans house.
Having said that, I am optimistic. 22 should have been, by all rights, a bloodbath. And the fact that it wasn't shows that the republicans are finally losing their grip on the public that let them win for so many years. More to the point, it's far too early to tell how things are going to shape up, so I'd be extremely wary of anyone playing the part of the doomer this far in advance.
Have a scoop of Pennsylvania House majority, Jack >

May I have mine with extra Fetterman? Thanks! >

And a Shapiro on top, please! >

monkey paw unfurls
Ben it is! >

I hate you so good for that. Well played. >

Dark Brandon having a banger speech tonight plus this. Good night to be a Dem supporter >

Good night to be an American.
Bad night to be a conservative. >


FENTANYL!

I expected it to be good but it was so much better. >


FENTANYL!

According to Republicans, Joe Biden is responsible for the fentanyl crisis. He makes all the fentanyl and deals it out. Busy president. >

They blame a loose border but trucks of fentanyl don’t go through desert sand, they go through border check points where they’re ignored. If anything, I think there needs to be even more tech at those points but shit, if Biden is at fault, then so is every president since we’ve had that border. Drugs be flying since the dawn of time back and forth. >

You get my random daily upvote for PROPER use of the word loose. A dwindling occurrence. Stay strong. >

Now if we could just talk about comma usage. >

Fucking A man >

Buttery males. >

Pennsylvania rebublicans just got their stupid prize for their stupid games.
Lots more to go, but a good start. >

Their games over the last two months thinking people wouldn't see through them has been ridiculous. The photo ops and lies about 'The Dems just walked out'. 
it will be interesting to see how this goes now with the constitutional amendments that they are trying to get through (they being republicans). They passed them as a package in the senate but the reason the house wouldn't go into session was partly because the dems don't want them as a package but each on their own, and republicans are refusing to pass the child sex lawsuit thing without also killing women. >

At this point all republicans can do to win is cheat,  gerrymander and try to convince people that living in a theocracy ruled by billionaires with Bibles will be great. They even use Russian and Chinese propaganda to persuade the masses. >

That’s will work if the COVID-19 and other preventable diseases doesn’t kill their constituents first.  
The same goes for climate change with the scalding summers and polarized winters. >

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 91%. (I'm a bot)


HARRISBURG - Democrats have swept three Allegheny County special elections, cementing their one-vote majority in the Pennsylvania state House and ending a two-month debate over which party controls the chamber.
With the wins, Democrats can now set the state House agenda for the first time since 2010 and will enjoy extra leverage in coming budget talks over how to spend more than $40 billion in projected state revenue.
State House Republicans have released their own rules package; state House Democrats have not, but are working on their own proposal behind closed doors.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: state^#1 House^#2 Republican^#3 Rozzi^#4 Democrats^#5 >

Thank you and congrats to PA voters. >

This will be mirrored nation-wide. The next general election will be a hoot! >

Senate is unfortunately not set up for success next cycle. >

Wasn't during this past midterm either. >

Yes it was. This most recent cycle is the most favorable to dems and the 24 cycle is the least favorable. >

I was hearing the same thing said about 22 about how unfavorable it was going to be for Dems. I'm not saying 24 won't be worse, but 22 was definitely doom and gloom.