>

Just look at Benghazi. An attack that left 4 Americans dead in Libya was immediately branded as Obama/Hillary's fault for failing to protect them.
Clinton oversaw the OKC bombing, but that was done by a bunch of right-wing cranks so it was hard to put a political spin on it against him. He was also only president for a couple of weeks when the first WTC attack happened in 1993.
The only thing that unites people is a common enemy. If America was attacked or invaded by a foreign power, that would unite us. That’s exactly why Bush was so incredibly popular after 9/11. >

It makes me wonder if the same effect would have happened if we had a Democratic president. Would Fox News have immediately blamed Democrats for the attacks, leading to a 50/50 split instead of the 90% Bush got?