>

Oh we already know that since he didn’t just walk out of Hunter’s life when he was on drugs.
Does anyone else find it strange that house republicans aren't investigating the "stolen" 2020 election?  
I mean Hunter Biden, COVID response, the FBIs investigation of trump's crimes, Afghanistan and "the border"... 
But not a single investigation into the "fraudulent" election?  It's almost as if they know nothing's there and it's a political loser.. >

They tried campaigning on it during the midterms and it didn't land. They somewhat wisely decided to let that one go. >

It landed but landed harder with the opposition. 
Republicans—any politician, really—need their voters in a heightened state of political awareness. For conservatives, they have decided the best/easiest way is to keep them scared and angry. So, they just smash whatever buttons do that as long as it doesn’t get the other side too worked up. 
The “election stealing” and abortion were a misstep that they let the ideologues push. They’re going back to basics that don’t affect Democrats so much. >

Republicans aren't interested in a legitimate investigation of Hunter Biden.  Their only purpose is slinging mud and damaging Joe Biden politically.  
They don't need their hearings to make legal sense.  They just want to haul a bunch of people in front of the cameras and make non-stop unsupported innuendo and accusations. >


Republicans aren’t interested in a legitimate investigation of Hunter Biden.  Their only purpose is slinging mud and damaging Joe Biden politically.

Republicans bragged privately and publicly how the Benghazi Hearings sank Hillary Clinton’s credibility and affected her in the polls, even they know that in the +7 hearings/congressional reports/+8 hours of public testimony, no charges were found against Clinton. 
The mudslinging is all they care about because they know it worked in the past to great effect. >

Dems are at least aware this time. Hunter isn’t acting like this will be any kind of good faith on their part like Clinton mistakenly did >

As long as we get more pictures of his penis we’ve done our job - GOP >

So that's what the P stands for! >

Good Ol’ Peen >


House Republicans are itching to investigate Hunter Biden. But they have a problem: The feds got there first.
Though their probes differ in focus and scope — Republicans are looking at possible conflicts of interest by the Biden family writ large while the Justice Department homes in on potential crimes by Hunter Biden — they’re treading on overlapping terrain. That’s an issue for the House GOP, because any DOJ indictment of Hunter Biden would effectively close off certain investigative paths.
The turf battle has flown largely under the radar, but it threatens to undermine one of House Republicans’ most highly visible priorities for their new majority. Investigating Hunter Biden is one of the few things they could do unilaterally, at least in theory. But the DOJ looms as a potential roadblock.
In fact, Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) suggested in a brief interview with POLITICO that the Justice Department should hold off on issuing any indictment against Hunter Biden so Republicans can complete their probe. He openly acknowledged that criminal charges could hinder his investigation, giving any witnesses in the DOJ case clearance to assert their Fifth Amendment rights. >

So congress is interested in obstructing justice. >

All I can say is thank goodness the republicans didn’t win the senate. All this nonsense is going to amount to nothing but noise: spinning their wheels about things they’re pissed off about and may have theories but nothing concrete. >

I DONT CARE ABOUT HUNTER. 
Like who does? They all commit crimes and we let them all walk away because there are no consequences for rich people. >

I care. The more I see Hunter Biden naked and having a great time on drugs, the more I relate to the Bidens. They should release more voicemails that prove Joe Biden is a caring father, too.