>

Dems are at least aware this time. Hunter isn’t acting like this will be any kind of good faith on their part like Clinton mistakenly did
Does anyone else find it strange that house republicans aren't investigating the "stolen" 2020 election?  
I mean Hunter Biden, COVID response, the FBIs investigation of trump's crimes, Afghanistan and "the border"... 
But not a single investigation into the "fraudulent" election?  It's almost as if they know nothing's there and it's a political loser.. >

They tried campaigning on it during the midterms and it didn't land. They somewhat wisely decided to let that one go. >

It landed but landed harder with the opposition. 
Republicans—any politician, really—need their voters in a heightened state of political awareness. For conservatives, they have decided the best/easiest way is to keep them scared and angry. So, they just smash whatever buttons do that as long as it doesn’t get the other side too worked up. 
The “election stealing” and abortion were a misstep that they let the ideologues push. They’re going back to basics that don’t affect Democrats so much. >

Republicans aren't interested in a legitimate investigation of Hunter Biden.  Their only purpose is slinging mud and damaging Joe Biden politically.  
They don't need their hearings to make legal sense.  They just want to haul a bunch of people in front of the cameras and make non-stop unsupported innuendo and accusations. >


Republicans aren’t interested in a legitimate investigation of Hunter Biden.  Their only purpose is slinging mud and damaging Joe Biden politically.

Republicans bragged privately and publicly how the Benghazi Hearings sank Hillary Clinton’s credibility and affected her in the polls, even they know that in the +7 hearings/congressional reports/+8 hours of public testimony, no charges were found against Clinton. 
The mudslinging is all they care about because they know it worked in the past to great effect.