>

EU: Let's negotiate that under the precondition of an independent Tibet and Xinjiang and the recognition of the independent Taiwan.
After the recent report that they have been quietly supporting Russia in Ukraine plus the balloon fiasco on top of people comparing Ukraine to Taiwan this is far from surprising. It’s just damage control with a thinly veiled threat. >

China is the enemy. They are just staying facts. >

Yes, and finally it seems the Nato west is waking up to this reality.
We are already in the opening moves of the seccond cold war.
May it never turn hot! >

Nato rocking the boat for many years is exactly how it turned this hot >

It's Nato's fault that Russia attacked a sovereign nation with genocidal intent! >

Never said that, Russia should never have invaded and should def pay for that. But if you’re not seeing that Nato for many years liked to keep pushing limits, you’re just not looking >

If Russia is so worried about NATO pushing, they should make their own version of NATO with blackjack and hookers. That way if NATO attacks they are defended without attacking other border nations premptively, as they tend to be doing for the past 15 years.
NATO adding members isnt NATO pushing, its other countries reacting when Russia decides to expand into nations like Georgia and Ukraine. >

China has been doing a lot of talking lately >

West Taiwan needs to calm down. >

That's an insult to Taiwan >

Eastern Tibet? >

Lowest Mongolia >

Upper Vietnam >

Mainland Hong Kong? >

Northern Nepal >

Northeastern Indian territorial district >

China is may be worried that if they started their own ‘special military operation’ that they would receive the same treatment as Russia, and so they want to see if supporting nations will give up on total victory eventually. >

That is 100% the situation. Let’s show them that the world will strangle them into the dark ages if they want to fuck around. >

exactly. While the Ukraine / Russian War will have long lasting and really bad consequences for most of the world, it made one thing clear. 
Move borders, get fucked. 
This is the important part of this conflict, WE, the "west" and most of the world do not want a return of armed conflicts that are able to move borders around. 
And this makes this conflict so important, the American "world domination tour" is not America conquering territory, its america spreading the western ideas. You can like this or not but America did not conquer Japan or Germany and made them state 54 and 55. Russia tries this with Crimea and the Oblasts, China want this for Taiwan. 
And the world said "Noooooo" >

As bad as the Iraq war was, and it was definitely an illegal invasion replete with war crimes, you didn't see America trying to annex land or even install a puppet government. This alone makes the whataboutisms about it complete bs >

And as bad as it was, an overwhelming majority of Americans supported the invasion at the time.  It was a disastrous mistake with grave consequences, but it was a mistake for which most of American society can share some blame.  The Russian situation is entirely different. >

Well, except that their long-time semi-democratically elected leader has pushed the Russian imperial agenda for twenty years. Opinion polls usually show substantial support for the invasion, or the general expansion of Russia. Hell, even “good guys” like Navalnij have openly supported for instance the annexation of crimea. 
Stop trying to infantilise the Russian people. >

Your grouping to much, these need only be referenced as the power structure they evoc to their surroundings. Most definitely, I have nothing but my thoughts to them, the internal individual members of these systems have to be regarded as an integral part of the substantiation of them through the use of cognitive guidence that has been developed and designed for centuries. The ultimate goal is to break the structures that controls people's reality while maintaining social cohesion within their environment for an evolutionary goal. This will be credited and as such questioned, that our own systems of power are defined by structures like money and social influence, these issues will be fixed in the future, but never again should we find it necessary for use of absolute power such as violence and war. >

“No, I don’t think that I will” >

shrieks, clutches pearls "Why are you so determined to destroy China!?!??!" >

"This is interference in China's internal affairs! Somehow!" >

How about... No. >

How about Winnie the Pooh stops sending balloons and sticking their nose to sovereign countries' affairs >

sounds like it's going well through the back channel communications >

Noted, file away into the 'to consider, never' folder. >

Actually it’s not up to the EU. Ukraine was the nation invaded by your friend without limitations, Russia. It is up to Ukraine what peace terms they will accept. >

Yes, and this latest message completely blow out of the water China's "neutrality" and "support for territorial integrity" by which they swear.
In reality, it is in China's best interests that Ukraine affirm territorial integrity and then they could demand the same with regards to Taiwan. They could claim Taiwan is sort of like Crimea. However, the concept of "friends without limitations" is getting in the way of sane policy. >

This is ridiculous because there is only power and goodwill in geopolitics.
The west wont let China get Taiwan to not be hypocrites, because China with Taiwan is a harder force to contain than China without. It’s a ridiculous notion that geopolitics is anything but who can and who is willing. >

From the Article:
“And we don’t believe that only providing weapons will actually solve the problem.”
And, he's right.   We have to provide real time targeting data as well. >

We already are >

Notably, it was a big part of the Moskva getting got. >

"Sorry did you say something China? There was a strange balloon in the way." >

This Gyna talk is ballooning outta control. >

The Chinese have an over-inflated opinion of themselves. >

Replace it with calls for Taiwan's 'complete independence' >

Taiwan IS independent... >

Try explaining that to the CCP. >

I just off the phone with the CCP. I tried to explain to them that Taiwan is an independent nation and that they should leave them alone. They disagreed, and then changed the subject about how America is a racist nation. >

What race did they say the Uighers are? >

Remember when they criticized Canada for residential schools?
Today we find out they took the idea and turned it up to 11! >

EU to China: “Drop call for complete Taiwan restoration to China”. China: “but that’s different!” >

I wish the Chinese would shut the fuck up for a few days. >

Woah bro >

No he’s right, he really wishes they would >

China needs to be told to go pound sand. >

EU: “how about no Scott” >

Would you like a suckle of my zipple? >

EU to China:
Drop any claim to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Nepal and Tibet. 
Stop herding anyone you like into prisons, cages and re-education camps. 
In general, stop being a dick. >

Nitpick: Hong Kong is very much the legally recognized territory of the PRC and has been since the UK handed it back in 1997. 
Sad reality is we have no power to change that or enforce China's obligations to respect HK democracy. Also, Tibet just isn't happening. >

Neither of those two things are likely to happen without a fight is a better way to put it.
But there are levels of dickishness the world is prepared to accept from China. There may come a point where it is worth the fight to enough people. And then it may change. >

Accurate, I was going to add "other than by force of arms." to the first sentence, but didn't feel like rehashing that discussion again as I'm sure that horse has been thoroughly beaten at this point. 
And even then, while there might be some political will (for now) in regards to Hong Kong, there just isn't for Tibet outside of old hippies and the young, who don't vote anywhere near as much as their parents and grandparents so politicians don't care about their opinions. >

Um, no, and a hearty fuck you, and healthy handshake. Here's a laurel! >

Ask Ukraine >


China says "security concerns of both sides - Ukraine and Russia - should be taken care of"

Russia has zero legitimate security concerns inside of Ukraine.  It's not their country.
China's involvement in Russia - Ukraine will go over as well as a lead balloon. >

Really? I actually think a Led Zeppelin wouldn't be a half bad idea. >

Hindenburg has left the chat >

Let's switch it to "total annihilation of terror regimes in ruzzia, China, North Korea, Iran and Syria". Those for starters. >

"And who did Germany declare war on.... well... the world..... and here's the thing... they almost won." >

“Y’ know, with Hitler, the more I learn about that guy the more I don’t like him.  I don’t know if you guys are history buffs or not but…” >

I heard he killed his dog close to the end of the war. Such an ass. >

But he did kill the leader of the Nazis so he did one positive thing. >

This claim is laughable. The EU and the US will continue to support Ukraine until "complete victory" so they can be a free, sovereign nation once again. Negotiation with Russia means giving something up.