>

Actually it’s not up to the EU. Ukraine was the nation invaded by your friend without limitations, Russia. It is up to Ukraine what peace terms they will accept.
After the recent report that they have been quietly supporting Russia in Ukraine plus the balloon fiasco on top of people comparing Ukraine to Taiwan this is far from surprising. It’s just damage control with a thinly veiled threat. >

China is the enemy. They are just staying facts. >

Yes, and finally it seems the Nato west is waking up to this reality.
We are already in the opening moves of the seccond cold war.
May it never turn hot! >

Nato rocking the boat for many years is exactly how it turned this hot >

It's Nato's fault that Russia attacked a sovereign nation with genocidal intent! >

Never said that, Russia should never have invaded and should def pay for that. But if you’re not seeing that Nato for many years liked to keep pushing limits, you’re just not looking >

If Russia is so worried about NATO pushing, they should make their own version of NATO with blackjack and hookers. That way if NATO attacks they are defended without attacking other border nations premptively, as they tend to be doing for the past 15 years.
NATO adding members isnt NATO pushing, its other countries reacting when Russia decides to expand into nations like Georgia and Ukraine. >

China has been doing a lot of talking lately >

West Taiwan needs to calm down. >

That's an insult to Taiwan >

Eastern Tibet? >

Lowest Mongolia >

Upper Vietnam >

Mainland Hong Kong? >

Northern Nepal >

Northeastern Indian territorial district >

China is may be worried that if they started their own ‘special military operation’ that they would receive the same treatment as Russia, and so they want to see if supporting nations will give up on total victory eventually. >

That is 100% the situation. Let’s show them that the world will strangle them into the dark ages if they want to fuck around. >

exactly. While the Ukraine / Russian War will have long lasting and really bad consequences for most of the world, it made one thing clear. 
Move borders, get fucked. 
This is the important part of this conflict, WE, the "west" and most of the world do not want a return of armed conflicts that are able to move borders around. 
And this makes this conflict so important, the American "world domination tour" is not America conquering territory, its america spreading the western ideas. You can like this or not but America did not conquer Japan or Germany and made them state 54 and 55. Russia tries this with Crimea and the Oblasts, China want this for Taiwan. 
And the world said "Noooooo" >

As bad as the Iraq war was, and it was definitely an illegal invasion replete with war crimes, you didn't see America trying to annex land or even install a puppet government. This alone makes the whataboutisms about it complete bs >

And as bad as it was, an overwhelming majority of Americans supported the invasion at the time.  It was a disastrous mistake with grave consequences, but it was a mistake for which most of American society can share some blame.  The Russian situation is entirely different. >

Well, except that their long-time semi-democratically elected leader has pushed the Russian imperial agenda for twenty years. Opinion polls usually show substantial support for the invasion, or the general expansion of Russia. Hell, even “good guys” like Navalnij have openly supported for instance the annexation of crimea. 
Stop trying to infantilise the Russian people. >

Your grouping to much, these need only be referenced as the power structure they evoc to their surroundings. Most definitely, I have nothing but my thoughts to them, the internal individual members of these systems have to be regarded as an integral part of the substantiation of them through the use of cognitive guidence that has been developed and designed for centuries. The ultimate goal is to break the structures that controls people's reality while maintaining social cohesion within their environment for an evolutionary goal. This will be credited and as such questioned, that our own systems of power are defined by structures like money and social influence, these issues will be fixed in the future, but never again should we find it necessary for use of absolute power such as violence and war. >

“No, I don’t think that I will” >

shrieks, clutches pearls "Why are you so determined to destroy China!?!??!" >

"This is interference in China's internal affairs! Somehow!" >

How about... No. >

How about Winnie the Pooh stops sending balloons and sticking their nose to sovereign countries' affairs >

sounds like it's going well through the back channel communications >

Noted, file away into the 'to consider, never' folder.