>

The far bigger question: who shot J.R.?
Russia: US has questions to answer. 
U.S.: What are the questions?
Russia: We won't know until you give us answers. >

The answer is 42 >

So long! And thanks for all the fish! >

That's my wake up alarm. >

Wasn't it some time traveling Anglo Saxon? >

John Titor did it. >

I find that most people can't grasp the power and influence of John Titor. Now that he finally has the old computer hardware from 20 years ago, the world is merely a marionette dangling from his puppeteer's hands. >

It was lost debugging hardware, and he says his timeline is different from ours.
Do you think a time traveler would lie to us? >

US: Russia has questions to answer over Ukraine invasion >

I was going to say.  U.S. should reply that they will give all the information they know willingly, as soon as Russia answers questions regarding war crimes committed in Ukraine. >

US using old Russian whataboutism tactics 2023 😳😳😳 >

What came first the invasion of Ukraine or the attack on Nord Stream? >

Invasion of Ukraine, following Russia limiting the gas flow then cutting the gas flow completely, Finally blown up in September to put pressure on Europe and driving prices through the roof. >

And then Europe rushing changes to become less dependent on Russian gas. Then, finally... the West being completely independent on Russian gas.
The culmination of Russia blundering. Again... and again... and again. >

Well, threats and blackmail wasn't working so maybe shooting themselves in the foot will work.... If the entire thing wasn't so tragic it could be a comedy. Hopefully they learn their lesson quickly. They will never get Ukraine to surrender. They have to know this by now. The only way to end this is to withdraw from all of Ukraine (Including Crimea). Take their citizens with them if they want to be Russian. >

Just tell Putin the pipeline fell off a balcony. >

lol, take my upvote. >

I heard it fell out of a high window. >

"We didn't do it."
Q&A over. >

Just to add a bit of context to this - dude has also been characterized as a bit of a conspiracy theorist. He has one anonymous source claiming that the US blew up the Nord-Stream and idk, that's not really enough to base a claim on. Not saying it's not true and I do think it warrants a closer look but I'd be personally skeptical. >

Agreed. That's fair, it should not be blindly believed, nor blindly dismissed yet. >

That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. >

Lotta Hitchens fans in these comments ha. Fair enough. He doesn't have hard evidence. But he lays out a fairly sensible case for it. >

Almost all fiction is written sensibly in a way that the reader can believe it to be true. 
The problem is, this guy is spouting this junk as if its fact, when he doesn't have any hard evidence to prove it.
And what he's doing (spouting unverified claims) is disruptive towards geopolitics, the stakes of which literally cannot be any higher. 
So, I don't care how sensible the guy sounds. He's play fast and loose with facts whilst pitting two nuclear superpowers against one another. >

"He's play fast and loose with facts whilst pitting two nuclear superpowers against one another."
Same could be said for most politicians in America advocating for more weapons for Ukraine and military aid for Taiwan >

What facts are those politicians playing fast and loose with? >

Russia needs to GTFO of the Ukraine.