>

I'm pretty much an avocado toast eating communist at this point, but.... wouldn't this infringe on their 2A rights if they're a well regulated militia?   I mean, that part is actually pretty clear.
This will only be used against leftists in black bloc >

Yeah that's my first thought. Using the bad optics of fascist groups to crack down on anarchists, antifa, etc in Portland. >

It’s the Oregon way
Edit: what am I saying? It’s the police everywhere way. >

Private militias are Illegal in the US. The problem is that their leadership and membership are mostly comprised of "Law Enforcement" and their families, along with a few ex-military that got kicked out for criminal behavior, and provide the "Training". >

Considering that America is rapidly destabilizing, this was absolutely necessary.
UPDATE: As some have pointed out, this law could be twisted for nefarious purposes to benefit the far right. I might need to think about this more. >

Yeah this is not going to help at all. It will only help the alt right. In Portland the police would take away leftists protests signs and other things they could use as weapons while letting the proud boys and friends bring whatever they want. They were regularly armed and pointed their guns at crowds with photo and video evidence and they were completely left alone. In fact the cops seemed nonexistent when the proud boys were out in droves. Curious. >

This is a very good point that I'm shocked that I didn't take into account as someone who lives in the Pacific Northwest (Seattle, specifically), because everything you said is true. >

It's good for the proud boys. Not so good for anyone who is trying to protect their community from far right violence. >

No no! The police will definitely enforce this equally! /s >

The FBI Facebook page was being bombarded by white supremacy “We the People” crazies denouncing this bill as orchestrated by the FBI. That was two days ago. Since then it’s denigrated into a cesspool of alt right conspiracies (Hunter’s laptop, Epstien List, election interference, deep swamp, etc.). 
Check it out; the comments on there are ludicrous! >

So they're going to crack down on their police? ^(jk that won't happen) >

“This is not a gun bill,” Grayber said. “This does not infringe on the rights of individuals to open carry, nor does it limit your Second Amendment rights.” >

Hope we can adopt this on a federal level. Enough of these roving cults.