>

It's a me ... Mario.
While we should sympathize with the victim for being harassed, let’s not forget that this guy was choosing to work for George freaking Santos. The recording he made bragging about lying in the past and gladly lying more FOR George Santos is super creepy. >

I feel like that kinda doesn’t matter, the dude sexually harassed him >

I mean, it doesn’t matter in the harassment case, but if you read up on this guy, he clearly sucks in like fourteen other important ways. >

I agree! He sucks! but when conversations being had about SA it almost sounds like victim blaming to state

this guy was choosing to work for George santos 

although probably far from ur intention tho >

No one said he was to blame for being harassed. He’s just very likely a shitty person. >

If you serve in his admin you can limit the damage he does. Blaming people for taking the call for serving thier country is poor form. You serve when you are called. >

That could be true, but that’s not what this guy was doing. Read his own words. Listen to his own tapes. This guy is a nut who loves power and celebrity and very little else. >

I don't have tapes of the victim. Do you? >

Yeah he released the secret recordings he made of George and the staff and himself and he’s done interviews. >

His whole "career" seems like a stress-test for how much fraud and depravity Republicans will tolerate in their elected officials. So far, the answer is, "All of it." >

That’s a bingo.
And certainly not the first test. They have been training for this for decades. >

We just say bingo >

What if you're Mario? >

Please, chris pratt has better things to do. >

Quick, call Pedro Pascal!