>

They'll pass it if they get control of Congress and the White House, though.
Lots of dazzle in the house for the republican masses. Absolutely no chance of it passing the Senate. Waste of time. Going to be a long 2 years. >

at least it gets their votes all on record, and if Kansas is any indication it won't help them in the next election >

They want the votes on record “My opponent Libby Blueperson, my esteemed Democratic candidate voted NO to save the lives of babies.  !! In fact the entire Dem party voted against saving babies!!! Just look at their voting record!!!!Do you want to keep voting for someone that is against saving babies?!?!?!”   Yep, they wanted that vote recorded all right. >

Yes.  I want my congresswoman vote to protects woman's healthcare and right to choose.  I'm glad she did >

Party of small government my ass. >

Yes, party with tentacles small enough to government your ass too. >

99% of what the GOP controlled House will do in the next 2 years is just grandstanding. It's all a show for their base. 
Boogeyman issues and culture war bullshit are all we're going to get from them, because they know they can't get any real legislation passed and have no actual plans to deal with inflation or any real problems. >

that's why gaetz wants to allow cspan full access vs their usual 1 fixed camera limit. trying to build out the clip reel for their dark money campaign ads. >

Ugh, the first time i saw that proposal from gaetz I imagined like the locker room and hall camera moments in wrestling.
They just want to be able to put on a show for cspan. Look directly at the camera and say some shit like "And the dems will eat your babies" with like the most stone cold serious expression >

Matt Gaetz is just upset that the mean old Democrats are trying to diminish his dating pool. >

Lmao, fuck true >

I see they are furiously working on that inflation, gas price, crime and border problem they spent ages bleating about. >

They're no longer an issue because the election is over. They don't want the issues solved so next election cycle they can grandstand about it still being an issue.  Remember their base is mostly stupid people who will watch fox "news" not talk about it, so in the next election cycle fox "news" can talk about how bad all these same issues are, even if they've actually gotten better. The truth doesn't matter, just getting their base angry enough to vote and keep them in power. >

So begins the long parade of virtue signaling and grandstanding. Bill after bill that has zero chance to pass being pushed through the house to signal their base.   Meanwhile, we'll find that any actual useful legislation will be subject to endless rounds of debate, and that's if it ever makes it to the floor. 
We've got two years of this shit to get through.  I'm betting on the first impeachment vote for Biden before March if they even wait that long.