>

Why is this title so incoherent?
I am a Michigan resident and a Whitmer voter.  I voted for her when she was my state senator as well as when she ran for governor.  However, I think she lacks the depth of experience to be president.  I would like to see her serve in the senate first.
Duhsatanis has limited appeal, and he is unlikely to win a national election.  Of course,  I thought Trump was done too.  However, going after Disney, the LGBTQ+ and his other culture war issues are unlikely to pull in the independent voters he would need to win. >

Her experience is significantly greater than Trump in 2016. Ronald Reagan, W and Bill Clinton were all two term governors, it used to be the norm.  Before Obama, JFK was the the last senate to presidency in 1960 and in 2008 it still would have been a senator if McCain had won. >

Don’t you know? Decorum, standards, and ability only matter when you are a democrat. You can be anyone and run for president as a republican and those things don’t matter. >

It’s not happening.. >

We need someone instead of Joe to run
Bring on the down votes >

Who's your pick? I'm largely on the "we need younger leaders" train, but for the life of me I can't spot a Democratic contender I like who also has a chance. >

Whitmer, Newsom, Pritzker all could beat trump or ron. >

I should familiarize myself with Pritzker, you're not the first I've heard put him on a shortlist with Newsom and Whitmer. >

he just hit a banger of a gun control measure in IL, that has me really excited for him.