>

Ok, that does not address my point
Criminally charging politicians for making poor decisions - dissuades them from making any decision at all, and does nothing to actually fix whatever was wrong
You would discourage politicians from doing anything (and probably discourage people from going into politics) if they will be criminally liable for the results of  their policies. You  would also be doing nothing to fix whatever went wrong
Criminally charging people with destruction of property - dissuades them from destroying property in the first place
Criminally charging politicians for making poor decisions - dissuades them from making any decision at all, and does nothing to actually fix whatever was wrong >

You're missing the point I'm not saying we should criminally charge politicians for making wrong decisions I'm saying if a politician (or any Public Employee) makes such a wrong decision it provokes a lawsuit against the General Public that costs the general public a significant amount of money the General Public should be empowered to criminally charge them with a destruction of public property of that amount of money
( I would agree maybe the term destruction of public property is wrong because it's not destroyed just transferred to the victims but I don't know exactly what you'd call what I'm trying to make a legal to charge them with provoking a lawsuit?)