>

But I was really looking forward to articles of impeachment being brought because Disney cast a dark skinned woman as the little mermaid, or because Joe fell off his bike.  
It's kind of a bummer that they now have something that sounds a bit more legitimate to waste time with.
“We’ve been investigating since November.” 
I’m more curious about NARA dropping the ball. >

Yeah, that's my issue mainly too. They should know if documents are missing. >


They should know if documents are missing.

I have a friend who works at State; he told me that the sheer volume of classified material generated by the WH makes it hard to control.
I don't care if it's hard to control, it needs to be controlled anyway. >

100% I've heard the same. Sheer volume. Over classification of documents. I don't care. Hire more people and develop new systems to manage it better. It needs to be under control. >

Your realize that rhe modus operandi of the GQP is to not fund places it doesn't want to do their jobs?
Post office?  Refuse to budget them, then say they're useless so they can try to privatize or get rid of it again.
IRS?  Keep under funding them, so they cannot have the manpower necessary to investigate  and litigate rich people and corporations for tax fraud/evasion.
Stop blaming the institutions being eroded, blame the assholes breaking it on purpose so they can get away with their  crimes >

Biden should just declassify the documents with his mind, problem solved. >

Maybe the FBI planted them! And if they didn’t then he already declassified them. >

Investigate and if anything improper is found then prosecute.  It's not rocket science.  This goes for Trump or Biden.  This is the difference between Republicans and Democrats.  Democrats don't give a shit if you go after a Democrat... if they did something wrong they should be punished. >

You can't prosecute a sitting president. That has been clearly established. The House can--and probably will--impeach him. >

They were going to impeach him anyway. They said as much.