>

Good fucking luck telling the guy who shamelessly lied his way into a winning lottery ticket to please respectfully give it up. Nobody gets it. This guy feels like he won and all he has to do hold on to his winning ticket. There is no resignation in this guy.
Over half of NY republicans are cool with this >

49% said he should step down; 26% said he shouldn't; that'd leave the other 25% in the undecided/no opinion category, as I understand it. >


that'd leave the other 25% in the undecided/no opinion category

Which for the GOP means “onboard with the majority” >

To be fair it means that for everyone. >

In other words, a majority of NY Republicans apparently don't care that this guy is a complete fraud. >

Based on the article, I get the impression that 25% are undecided?
49% said he should step down; 26% said he shouldn't; that'd leave the other 25% in the undecided/no opinion category I'd think. >

If they are undecided at this point, given the flood of proven lies, then the lies are not a deal breaker apparently. Their unwillingness to take a firm stand against him with so much public info out there is a willful ignorance at best. >


The Siena College Research Institute poll, published on Monday, found that 49 percent of Republican respondents said that Santos should resign from his position, while 26 percent said the first-term lawmaker shouldn’t step down. 

I mean, he should step down, but then, when has the party of personal responsibility ever taken personal responsibility? They're all spineless. Hell, McCarthy even gave him Committee seats. >

And, McCarthy fund-raised for him. The Republican Party is 100% responsible for him. And, they do not care. >

They only care he got caught >

Why haven't the citizens in his district filed a class action lawsuit for fraud? Are they not allowed? >

They are not allowed to sue, because what he did is not illegal. >

I'm talking about civil suit, not criminal.
And isn't fraud a crime anyway? >

Not in a political office. 100 percent legal to lie. That’s a fact! >

He absolutely can still be found civilly liable for defrauding his constituents regardless of whether his activity was criminal. Please educate yourself before posting. >

It was the drag picture that pushed them over the edge, I'm sure. >

Only 50%?
Jesus >

Integrity has lost its meaning >

Can at least half of us agree that he ought to acquire some V-neck sweaters? >

"Almost half." So more than half of the Republicons in the district are total shit-bags. Not a surprise. >

Just absolute proof that Republicans will vote for anyone with “R” next to their name >

Get rid of him and I’ll take the job, can’t think of any other job where you can say all sorts of crazy BS in a totally consequence free environment >

Won’t matter. >

49% donned their hot-dog costumes and wondered who could have been responsible for such a thing. >

Santos doesn't answer to NY Republicans. 
He answers to the dark money fascists that bankroll him. >

Only half? What the hell does he have to do to get the other 50% to be totally disgusted with him like the rest of us are? >

So less than half. >

I'm not sure how you can kick out one of the original signers of the constitution itself? >

Only HALF!  OMG… he’s literally a walking straw man. >

There is the problem in out country...51% of REPUBLICANS do not think Santos should resign. >

Whether it’s illegal or not to lie to get elected, it just looks bad and shouldn’t be rewarded by being allowed to stay in an elected position when you’ve been exposed on the level this guy has.
If we’re ever going to regain even a small amount of integrity in US politics, we have to start somewhere. >

What do the other half think he should do? >

The other half is suffering from lead exposure….. >

IOW, more than half of the Republicans in New York are fine with being governed by compulsive liars/financial cheats. The party of good ol' "Fambly values" >

What a great human