>

"In effect, many firms headquartered in these nations have resisted 
pressures from governments, the media, and NGOs to leave Russia since 
the invasion of Ukraine."
It's funny how there are already 2 comments who claim the Moscow Times has a Russian bias even though the paper is banned in Russia for going against the countries narrative. Google would help you guys a lot.
Edit:
On topic: what does not having left really mean, I know from a similar post on my countries subreddit that there was a bank still in Russia, but the only thing they did was collect debt payments from already outstanding loans. It would be stupid to not do that. >

None of them mentioning that the study referenced in the article comes from Switzerland… >

Are they counting firms that technically left but still have operational assets there they can't sell and won't just abandon? >

Surely you couldn't be suggesting that a collection of preprint, non peer reviewed sources may contain inaccurate, contradictory, or untruthful information.