>

Integrity has lost its meaning
Over half of NY republicans are cool with this >

49% said he should step down; 26% said he shouldn't; that'd leave the other 25% in the undecided/no opinion category, as I understand it. >


that'd leave the other 25% in the undecided/no opinion category

Which for the GOP means “onboard with the majority” >

To be fair it means that for everyone. >

In other words, a majority of NY Republicans apparently don't care that this guy is a complete fraud. >

Based on the article, I get the impression that 25% are undecided?
49% said he should step down; 26% said he shouldn't; that'd leave the other 25% in the undecided/no opinion category I'd think. >

If they are undecided at this point, given the flood of proven lies, then the lies are not a deal breaker apparently. Their unwillingness to take a firm stand against him with so much public info out there is a willful ignorance at best. >


The Siena College Research Institute poll, published on Monday, found that 49 percent of Republican respondents said that Santos should resign from his position, while 26 percent said the first-term lawmaker shouldn’t step down. 

I mean, he should step down, but then, when has the party of personal responsibility ever taken personal responsibility? They're all spineless. Hell, McCarthy even gave him Committee seats. >

And, McCarthy fund-raised for him. The Republican Party is 100% responsible for him. And, they do not care. >

They only care he got caught >

Why haven't the citizens in his district filed a class action lawsuit for fraud? Are they not allowed? >

They are not allowed to sue, because what he did is not illegal. >

I'm talking about civil suit, not criminal.
And isn't fraud a crime anyway? >

Not in a political office. 100 percent legal to lie. That’s a fact! >

He absolutely can still be found civilly liable for defrauding his constituents regardless of whether his activity was criminal. Please educate yourself before posting. >

It was the drag picture that pushed them over the edge, I'm sure. >

Only 50%?
Jesus