>

Agree, and aside from it being politically smart to back bodily autonomy when it comes to abortion rights, taking a neutral position is throwing women under the bus.
"being in your 80s is not great, trust me, I know from personal experience" >

Yeah, was kind of a pot and kettle situation lol >

Not really, seeing as how she stepped down.
I voted for Biden, but fuck no he shouldn’t run again. Find a good fairly left leaning candidate who is 
-Pro bodily autonomy
-Neutral on the 2nd Amendment
-Loudly workers rights/pro middle class 
Obliterate the GOP. Literally just don’t talk shit about guns and harp on all the under-14 year old pregnancies and it’ll be a slaughter. That’s all it takes. >

I disagree on the first point, the GOP was utterly eviscerated compared to the norm in the midterms, and a lot of that was driven by abortion rights. Three important data points:


Pew polling in May had <20% of the country in favor of a total abortion ban with no exceptions. Which Republicans are going for.


Kansas a bit after Roe was overturned voted to keep abortion legal in a state referendum. It wasn't even close. 


I believe it was Kentucky during the midterms that also had a referendum? And again no question, keeping abortion legal handily won.


The debate comes on where it should be legal, not if it should be legal. When people in red states overwhelmingly vote to keep abortion legal, it's something to capitalize on. As an added bonus, it's also the right thing to do. 
Unless you mean defining when it should and shouldn't be legal, in which case I agree, not the time to do that. I'm all for a strong workers/middle class push, but I do think we should temper expectations.
Edit: For the record I also voted for Biden but I think he needs to let someone younger run. He should build up possible contenders and give them experience now for later.