>

What dilemma would that be? Dems hate her, want her gone, and will make it so when she’s up for re-election. Nice and simple, from what I can see.
Replace her, no dilemma. >

I guess unless she goes third party to fuck democrats? Would she do that? >

Um, you’re not from Arizona, are you? >

What's the dilemma? She gets replaced at the soonest opportunity. It's not like any Democrat voters want to keep her. >

Yep, and we already have a great frontrunner candidate in Ruben Gallego. Dude is well-liked and respected in Arizona, is progressive on the important issues, and, like John McCain, is a military combat veteran >

I'm thrilled that Gallego is running, just sent him a donation earlier today. >

Everyone hates her. I think they are hoping she splits the vote so significantly that a repub will win, but that’s pretty idiotic since she’s generated so much easy ammo for dems to use. I mean sh￼e was a paid speaker at many gop events, no dem has been doing that — she’s cooked. >

And what about republicans bigger dilemma…George Santos >

The "dilemma" he's referring to is the notion that Democrats might be better off not running a candidate and supporting "Independent" Sinema as the best chance of holding onto the seat.
This makes sense if you live in Washington. If you populate the real world, Sinema has a 0% chance of reelection whether the Democrats run a candidate or not. She's so incredibly unpopular, she cannot win, even heads-up against whatever fucking lunatic the Arizona GOP selects.
The only real question is whether Sinema will run as an independent and spoil the election for the Dems. >

Yep, I know a few people who live in Arizona, and they said if Dem's don't run a candidate next time, they will just leave their Senator pick blank. It's just a few people, but I get the feeling that a lot of people will do that. >

Enema is not even a democrat anymore. I dont think there is any debate at all.