>

No it’s not right to do that. You can just note where you’re referring to and speaking from in your comment. Adding the words ‘in America’ if you’re talking about government, law etc etc takes literally a second. Maybe I should just assume intellectual laziness on the part of all Americans. 
If you were in real life at a party with only 40% Americans you probably wouldn’t go around speaking to everyone as if they are also American. But here we are.
We need to have a national conversation about cameras and recording in general. Great it’s not illegal to film people in public places (I’m not arguing that it should be), it’s also not illegal to fart in a crowded elevator but we all recognize it’s rude. >

I mean, other than repealing the 1st amendment, what do you think the results of a “national conversation” are ? >

Considering this forum is used across the globe, can you please advise what the First Amendment is, for Australia, or do you mean the First Amendment of the US Constitution, and if so, could you please quote it in full? >

He said “national”conversation and there are 
more redditors from the US than any other country. So I assumed he’s from the US. 
First Amendment to the US constitution guarantees freedoms of Religion, Speech, assembly, protest, and Press. 
US Supreme Court ruled that the “freedom of press” clause in the 1st amendment guarantees the right to every citizen to take pictures and video of everything they can see from a public venue. >

While is likely that you assume correctly, saying that a national conversation is needed could apply to any country. 
The fact is that you are not only speaking with other Americans on reddit in general and on this thread specifically. >

I know I’m not, but as the plurality of Redditors are from the US, it is right to assume it’s from the US when no other indication is given.