>

Ad hominem and gatekeeping.  What I am has nothing to do with your original prejudicial, and ageist, comment.
The reason is simple…
He knows a lawsuit is already underway with FOX NEWS and he’s more interested in hiding his assets just as Alex Jones had attempted to do after losing his case in court. Unfortunately for him, a forensic analysis of his holdings has revealed most if not all of his assets.
Murdoch deserves everything that’s coming his way and more. >

Absolutely! >

Neither of these treasonous propaganda site should be called "news". >

News Corp has Dow Jones, which publishes the Wall Street Journal and a business news wire >

I guess that shows that they aren't a reliable source for news then.
 Anything Murdock is attached to is a cesspool of extreme disinformation. >

You’re not in reality. The WSJ is definitely legit >

Is Murdock associated with the Wall Street journal, then it's shit. >

Al Jazeera is owned by the Qatari government but that doesn't change that it is generally considered by Western journalists to have excellent coverage of anything not involving Qatar.
Your argument is not only lazy but also removed from reality. The WSJ has it's own share of issues, like every newspaper, but is overall a decent source of information for business related and economic news. >

how about the plans to meet his maker >

Yes, yet he does have heirs who will gladly keep his treasonous,  vile, and corrupt methodology,.
 At some point, we genuinely need to ask ourselves if our future is less important than allowing for open disinformation. Some would call it censorship. 
 I would call it, destroying malevolent propaganda. >

I think he has one heir disavow his father's ideology. But then we have the other heir who reportedly actually drank the koolaid his father produced. >

Just trying to distance his assets from the Dominion lawsuit. He's going to get fucked, he just wants to lessen the severity. >

I'm always disappointed when I see a Rupert Murdoch headline and the third word isn't "dies" >

100% >

I hope some installs a funnel over this guys grave one day. I wouldn’t want a single drop to miss him. >

He is the epitome of something that is wrong with his entire generation. >

Don't be ridiculous.  Any grouping of people isn't homogeneous.  He's a reptile, but my gram and gramps were beautific people that everyone loved. >

So were (are) mine. But there’s something about that generation that embraced the kind of division Murdoch peddled. Not all, for sure, a quarter of humanity is a lot of people, and they’re not one group, but many more than either the generation above or below them.
Interestingly, both in western cultures and east European ones too. It’s them watching the propaganda on Russian state TV.
Maybe some downstream effect of the Cold War, as well as the last major generation to still be meaningfully religious. Or perhaps they just didn’t live in as much of a world where your job has people in different counties on your team.
Most likely, a little bit of all of the above. >

Still nonsense.  That's just a collection of statements and ponderings, not one of which is coherent or demonstrable, much less have anything to do with each other.  His generation is a collection of people.  It was an interesting period.  There was an interesting period before it, and another one came after.  During them, most people just tried to live their lives.  Exactly like today.