>

The "dilemma" he's referring to is the notion that Democrats might be better off not running a candidate and supporting "Independent" Sinema as the best chance of holding onto the seat.
This makes sense if you live in Washington. If you populate the real world, Sinema has a 0% chance of reelection whether the Democrats run a candidate or not. She's so incredibly unpopular, she cannot win, even heads-up against whatever fucking lunatic the Arizona GOP selects.
The only real question is whether Sinema will run as an independent and spoil the election for the Dems.
Replace her, no dilemma. >

I guess unless she goes third party to fuck democrats? Would she do that? >

Um, you’re not from Arizona, are you? >

What's the dilemma? She gets replaced at the soonest opportunity. It's not like any Democrat voters want to keep her. >

Yep, and we already have a great frontrunner candidate in Ruben Gallego. Dude is well-liked and respected in Arizona, is progressive on the important issues, and, like John McCain, is a military combat veteran >

I'm thrilled that Gallego is running, just sent him a donation earlier today. >

Everyone hates her. I think they are hoping she splits the vote so significantly that a repub will win, but that’s pretty idiotic since she’s generated so much easy ammo for dems to use. I mean sh￼e was a paid speaker at many gop events, no dem has been doing that — she’s cooked. >

And what about republicans bigger dilemma…George Santos