>

Exactly this. The two way street is treating everyone equally. Do I loathe Pelosi for using her power to “win” the stock market and gain wealth? Yup. She’s scum to me, and I’d like to see her held accountable, just like anyone else who has done the same. 
Don’t even get me started on the Panama Papers.
remember, that is a dangerous two-way street!

That's right; if they can do this to him, they can do this to Biden!
What's that? Already voluntarily released before the election? Over 20 years worth without any gaps? And every other president since Nixon, too? >

Realistically, they're talking about Hunter Biden. 
Any anyone else that pisses them off and for whom they think they could gain political mileage by releasing the tax returns and screaming from the Fox News pulpit:  "isn't it WEIRD that John Smith earned $350k for CONSULTING! People are asking questions about whether this is legitimate." >

I mean, hunter Biden isn't an elected official, doesn't have a security clearance, isn't one of Biden's advisors.
Their hunter witch hunt just makes most people roll their eyes because hunter isn't in the public view and most people don't give a fuck about him. >

In fact, everybody recognizes Hunter is a flawed person, and everybody admires Joe Biden for his unwavering fatherly love for his son. >

Remember when republicans tried to blast Biden by sharing a VM he left for Hunter? All that was taken  away is that showing love to your son is alien to conservatives. >

Love is alien to them. >

Not quite. Love guns >

They don't love guns. They just tell them they do, to get them into bed. >

It's amazing how he can continue to charge his base when the DOJ seems to have enough to indict him and put him in jail with no bond. He's like the leader of the American Taliban. Mind boggling. >

Y'all Queda. >

Meal Team Six. >

I know this is repeated so often just because it's funny, but I really don't like this one because it implies these people are out of shape and harmless.  Sure, there are plenty of fat, stupid, incapable tacticool larpers out there, but for every one of them is an incredibly fit and trained psycho who has the gear and knows how to use it.  Probably ex-military, possibly even ex-special forces.  We should absolutely not underestimate these people >

These MAGA super soldiers you are inventing in your head are the same ones who just got convicted for Whitmer plot and J6. That’s literally their best. The vast majority of MAGA militants all share the same weakness: they can’t miss a meal. >

First off, I would love to have a genuine good faith discussion about this.  What makes you think I'm inventing them and what makes you think those fools are their best?  Their best aren't outing themselves as members of these crazy right wing militias, and they certainly aren't getting caught planning half-witted attempts at kidnapping governors.  What makes you think these guys are all addicted to food?  You can find plenty of the guys I'm talking about on youtube who are not in jail for insurrection, and have the weapons and the training to actually pull something terrible off.  Look up warrior poet society or garand thumb on youtube.  The warrior poet society guy is closer to those failed michigan militia people, but especially guys like garand thumb are potentially dangerous not only because they are skilled and well armed, but because they're doing a pretty good job of appearing apolitical.  There are hundreds more like them, and those are just the well known ones who have youtube channels with millions of followers.  If even 1% of their followers are as fit, skilled, and armed as they are, that could be a serious problem.  If I'm wrong (but I'm not), then no harm done, but if you're wrong, that could be a grievous oversight that could cost lives, so why keep promoting the idea they're all fat and incapable, even if you suspect it might be true? >

It's quite simple.
If they have the numbers, they don't need to be secret.
If they have to be secret, they don't have the numbers to do anything but one or two highly visible domestic terror acts.
It's a black and white proposition. Only a true sack of garbage proposes they are both too strong and too secret. >

That's an interesting preposition you've concocted there, but what are we actually even debating anymore?  I was just saying we should be careful about perpetuating the idea that these people are all too out of shape to do anything terrible.  It seems like you're admitting they could in fact do something terrible.  Oh, only one or two highly visible domestic terror acts, that's all?  Well golly gee, I sure feel foolish!  Those guys who bombed the Oklahoma federal building, killing 168 people were totally harmless, my bad.  I forgot those 168 people weren't actual people that we have to worry about because it was just one highly visible domestic terror act >

The ideal is zero casualties.
As a pragmatic matter you and I both know it will not and cannot turn out that way when dealing with white nationalism.
Is it normal for you to fret over shit you, and for that matter the government, has zero control of?
This isn't a good faith discussion, it's you having an anxiety attack. >

The second he said "I'd love to have a good-faith discussion about this" was a red flag for me. Its clear they were going to shit all over whatever you posited. >


In a statement sent to Newsweek, Trump warned that House Democrats "should have never" publicized the tax records—some of the most privately held documents in the nation—and that the U.S. Supreme Court "should have never approved it."
"It's going to lead to horrible things for so many people," Trump said. "The great USA divide will now grow far worse. The radical, left Democrats have weaponized everything, but remember, that is a dangerous two-way street!"

He really doesn't understand that all presidential nominees release their taxes voluntarily. He is just a gigantic dum dum. >


The great USA divide will now grow far worse. 

Yeah, between those of us who pay our fair share of taxes and those who don't. >

This part >


and cautioned that doing so would lead to public pressure for GOP lawmakers to go after the tax information of Democrats, like President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, once they take control of the House next week.

Hunter Biden, last time I checked, doesn't hold public office and is not an elected official. He's just some random guy off the street.
They might as well threaten to release Carrot Top's tax returns, nobody would likely give a damn. >

If they're going after kids, let's get all of Jared and Ivanka's tax returns, too.  I'm sure none of their corruption would be evident there. >

Well Jared held an office. So they should have already gone after him. >

The same Jared who those doing clearance investigations had concerns over granting him a clearance? But Trump-in-law ordered that clearance?
Yeah, that was always going to go well. >

It’s only dangerous if you do shady shit >

Oh no now the GOP will release Democrat legislature tax returns that the Democrats already released!  
What an assclown. >

It's almost like he doesn't pay attention to a fucking thing that's not him. >

Apparently he didn’t know the WH schedules were public either. Though at this point the man is a walking lie so idk >

Oh no...
Perhaps everyone in high governmental office (exec or legislative) should have their tax returns made public. 
Yes, please. Do that. >

He’s having a MAGA Tantrump again. >

A yugly big Trumpertantrum.  The yugest! >

Ugliest, both inside and out… >

Again republicans never seem to realize that things they think are terrible are actually fine with democrats. Hell, even previous republican presidents had released their tax returns. Saying "it is a two way street" is not really a threat. 
I know it might be hard to believe that democrats wabt people who commit fraud and are corrupt to be held accountable regardless of party. For some reason republicans think it is  or already to just play dumb and pretend everything is perfect. It is the trump part of zero accountability, they don't even know what that word even means.