>

source on this? was it in the article? (guilty of not reading it lmfao)
“I am not a criminal,” Santos said during a separate interview with the Post

So he's most definitely a criminal. He's even wanted in his home country for check fraud. This scumbag cannot be trusted. >

Just wait until he's sworn in and privy to important (valuable) national secrets. Be there, will be wild! >

Something tells me unless the maga caucus is in control of the house, this guy never sees a committee assignment. >

I would hope so. But someone might be desperate enough to offer a commitee assignment in exchange for a vote as Speaker. >

They really have no shame. >

Grade A sociopath >

Standard issue republican. >

Shot a man for snoring.... 
(you know it's coming out soon enough) >

What other news are we going to find out about this idiot? I bet there’s lots of skeletons in the closet. >

Honestly it's a daily lie drip. I admit a lot of it has made me LOL for real but at the end of the day there is more to cry about with this story. This country is in a lot of trouble. >

If a man can get elected based on a background that is mostly or completely fabricated and there are no repercussions, I tend to agree. I mean, how could you trust any politician on anything they say no matter how big or small, again? I suppose in the two party system you can mostly localize it to the party involved directly, but how many Republican voters just don't care because he may still pull the R lever for them? Based on the conservative sub reaction to this guy, a lot. More than none which is a problem.
I've wondered for some time now why this has never happened but in the opposite direction. Instead of lying to get seated in your own party, lie that you are say, a democrat and then in office just openly vote party line Republican for everything. I mean if the benefitting party is cynical enough to just take the vote and not complain/expel you, why not? I guess it would only work for a cycle, but imagine some sociopath does this for the presidency.
Like, do we really expect the benefitting party to step in and say no? If it's judges, SCOTUS, other appointments and policies at stake? Especially today's Republicans? Makes me think. >

Sinema is this. >

Also, in an interview he said something like:  I looked at Donald Trump and said to myself, if he can do it, I can, too.  I forget the exact quote.  It seems he was talking about lying through his teeth and getting rich at it.  
I want to know where his mystery millions came from. >

Dimming read somewhere it was from a group associated to Michael Flynn. >

"George Santos" rearranged spells "Orangest Egos".  Coincidence? >

Remember "Ron Vara"? >

I'm getting Steve Bannon vibes.  Any cats of acid found? >

Meow! >

Smearing feces on the walls seems to be a republican tradition. >

A rite of passage >

Did the democrat running for this seat simply not have an opposition research person? >

both dems and a small local paper did oppo and found red flags, but the msm and dem party at large wouldn't pursue it because they were sure Santos was going to lose.
Sound familiar? >

The democrats really do be the worst enemy of the democrats. Clutching defeat from the hands of victory through inaction. >

I also direct you to the msm. >

Time Santos went back to obscurity! >

I have a bad feeling this guy is an awful combination of criminal and mentally ill. He's one lie after another. Like, he can't stop lying and can't not put himself at the center of things. >

He definitely has mental issues >

He’ll be president in 10 years. >

So who is the money conveyor that connects a world that has tens of millions in it and this guys world? Roger Stone up to his old tricks? >

four dogs in a apartment.. fuck man >

That is not a trashed apartment if those photos are the evidence. >

Linked story doesn't show pictures of his apartment . . . >

There's a link that says "Read it at New York Post" at the bottom of the Daily Beast blurb, and there're pictures there. >

If a landlord tried to use those pictures in small claims to argue 'trashed' they'd be thrown out an airlock the judge would build themselves into the courtroom to do so. But those looked like 'lived in' pictures anyway, not move out. >

He's only 34, how can you make up this much crap so early. And getting elected at 34, who the h... votes for a 34 year old for congress? Even if everything he said was true, he would not have enough life experience to do the job properly. >

I'm 50 and I'd vote for a 34 year old for Congress.  Not this guy.  Fuck this guy.  But the right 34 year old, sure.  If anything Congress needs its average age dragged down. >

"Reporters tracked Santos down at his normal hang-out spot, outside Queens comic book and role playing game emporium 'Dungeon of Justice', and asked the embattled Rep.-elect about his landlord's accusation."
"Speaking between puffs from a Swisher Sweet, Santos claimed to be in possession of a 'super-rare taped copy of a clip of that morning tv lady blowing her brains out live' and that he was making sure it was in his 'unbreakable computer-activated electronic lock with 1024 bit encryption codes' safely."
"When reporters shot back that 'like, everyone has seen that, it cuts away before she actually does it,' thus making Santos 'a tool', the Rep.-elect said his version 'was ripped from the master tape reel by my uncle Cody who worked at the station where it happened.  Uncle Cody got real fucked up from seeing it, and now lives in my grandma's basement'."