>

Definitely, Democrats are renowned for their ability to build on electoral momentum.
Howard Dean's "50 State Strategy" needs to be resurrected. Too many Republican House members ran unopposed. This starts at the local level getting people run in local/state level races to build up the bench to run for Statewide/House/Senate/Presidential races. >

I would love to see this but it would also need to be paired with the Democrats continuing to fight for working people and translating that fight in to tangible outcomes for working class and rural people that are well communicated to them. >

If you fight in every district you'll get some wins by those candidates because districts are different. >

If they start tackling income inequality in a big way, absolutely. >

Yes, but don't mention the historic losses in OHIO to them.
SMH >

There were no historic losses in Ohio.  The Ohio legislation has looked pretty much the same for 10 years now.  The numbers shift 2 or 3 seats in the house election back and forth and the senate pretty much has looked the same for a decade. >

Yes there were, Dems had a chance to win Ohio back and lost the Gov, SOS, AG, Supreme Court and more. 
Dem National Party has abandoned Ohio. This is a big mistake. This is not acceptable. >

Which are all jobs that have been Republican for over a decade now.  These were not historic losses, they are the normal state of politics in Ohio. >

knowing them absolutely not