>

The only way to deal with these people and people like this in the future is to get rid of the poison they’ve been feed in the first place. These actions and thoughts aren’t normal, watching limitless porn as a child, or even as an adult isn’t normal. It’s like a drug, and people do things they normally wouldn’t while while under the influence. 
So, no. We don’t worry about the symposiums first, we should by all means attack the virus itself
how do they determine if 33% or more of a websites content is porn? >

And what’s porn and what isn’t. Someone dressed in a hazmat suit bathing in ranch dressing isn’t porn…..to some people. >

ok but how do you quantify it? you explanation does not show how they get to a 33% figure >

And could you game the system to throw it off. PornHub could just upload petabytes of non graphic, AI generated content to throw that figure off. 33% porn, the rest AI generated videos. >

good luck enforcing this one >

Pornhub is already complying. >

People still use pornhub? >

What else would we use? >

Didn't mean it in a judgemental way. I stopped using them when they axed a ton of amateur content a couple years ago. I get why they did it, but didn't like how they did it. Also they directly leaked my info onto the dw and forced me to have to abandon an email address I had for years.
These days I'm content to use NSFW reddit subs. >

You didn't use a burner email on a porn site? Really? >

Purchases of VPN subscriptions will be going up. >

This law sponsored by Nord VPN >

Louisiana, for those wondering. >

It took me reading half of the comment thread to realize they didn't mean LA. Haha >

My drunk ass thought the same thing and left me very confused. >

Off topic but can this wallet id be used as a id to vote with at the polls? >

Yes, it can >

Thank you for the information,  I appreciate it. >

Of all the problems in Louisiana and this is what they consider important? >

Making sure no one enjoys sex is high on the list priorities at their Wednesday/Sunday social club. 
However, wouldn't be surprised if by Monday a bunch of those in the state congress say they had no idea what was in the bill they voted into law. >

I’m sorry but Louisiana can’t be trusted as a state and should be annexed as a territory of the US until it can get its shit together. It’s rife with corruption, the state government in Louisiana can’t be trusted to not abuse this. >

As a Louisianian, yes. Local government as well. >

Got caught embezzling from the town? Move to the next parish and do it again. >

Got caught? Run for governor! People love a brazen criminal! >

I can’t wait until the list of users gets hacked and spilled into the public so we can see what kind of porn the hypocritical politicians watch. >

Republicans use kids as political shields any time they want to control other people. 
And why is a site with only 1/3 pornography not required to do this? Won’t little Jimmy still see boobs if the other 2/3 are about tractor repair? >

Jane Deare knows her power tools! >

Upvote for cleverness and double entendre! >

We'd like to take a moment to talk about today's sponsor- NordVPN... >

Because parents choose not to monitor/raise their child, Louisiana has decided that the porn industry is responsible for the kids now. >

I'm pretty sure erectile dysfunction is not a symptom of concern in a child. Neither do children normally need to use LA Wallet. >

Not understanding how your comment relates to LA requiring government issued identification of person to view other humans in their natural state via common carrier? >

The representative said the law is to protect children from porn, but the rationalizations given and the method used targets and tracks adult usage. 
It's not "for the children." It's for pushing theocracy a little deeper into state law. This is their next move in the wake of the anti-abortion laws, punishing miscarriages, and restricting birth control. 
You have some brainwashed true believers who think the instictive human interest in sex can be stopped by making sex an unspeakable taboo subject again. Then you have the ones who realize this law gives them access to confidential information that they would not otherwise be allowed to access. >

Good luck enforcing this when VPNs exist and there’s literally thousands of porn sites and aggregator sites, many of which are outside their jurisdiction or even the country.  Just fascists wasting money trying to play morality police >

Most of the people most affected by having to register directly with the state are not the type of people competent enough to use a VPN. >

The ones making the laws are the ones addicted to porn. >

It's always projection.  Mike Lee is clearly a porn addict. >

It would be kind of hilarious if every porn website blocked the entirety of Louisiana from access. >

Previous post deleted by mods due to mismatching title. Sites like Pornhub now require you to sign up and link LA Wallet (drivers license app) or provide your personal info to view pornographic content. Thank the totally-not-fascist party of small government for the beginning of tracking your online footprint for things they don’t like. >

Right now it's porn, tomorrow it's union organization >

Union organization is Wednesday, tomorrow is your menstrual cycle. >

Eventually they will scan your ID if you're getting contraceptive >

Yeah, but you can say Merry Christmas!
/s. >

I say happy holidays cause it includes celebrating the new year, right? >

You can say whatever you want! >

So will I be on some sort of list based on my porn preferences? >

Depending on what those preferences are, you may already be on a list. >

repub reps stressin bout the inevitable data leak >

This is a strain of what we call 100% Freedumb. 
This idea that you can accept a restriction on your freedom while pretending that you’re someone who values freedom above all. >

What next? ID to purchase scary films from Amazon and Netflix? >

Oh no no no, you see, the Good Lord doesn’t care if children get traumatized with gore and violence, that’s literally half the Bible. >

Oh, of course,  Louisiana not Los Angeles.  My first thought was "good luck with that." >

In Los Angeles you have to show your ID to make the porn >

Yeah well pornhub is based in Canada so good luck enforcing local laws on an international country. >

PH has already started adhering to it, unfortunately. >

PH generally is very PR-friendly for a porn company. Makes sense they’d comply. >

Let these assholes keep passing shit like this without people rioting. And soon they will pass webcams on at all times to make sure its the actual person jerking of to midget porn >

Louisiana is one of the worst states to live in. Ranked out of the 50 states, this is where they stand:
Healthcare: #46
Opportunity and Education: #48
Infrastructure and Economy: #47
Fiscal Stability: #42
Crime: #50 — the worst in the US
Natural Environment: #49
So of course, porn, of all things is a top priority. /s
Absolutely pathetic. >

Not to mention the racism >

Fucking kids.  I don’t feel bad for any of you at all.  
Also, this can’t be enforced and vote them out. >

They thought about this in the UK but it has been delayed for years because there is no way of doing it. First, the bright idea was to use credit card to access sites, even free ones. It was quickly pointed out that was a scammers heaven.
Any way of doing this is about as good as the age verification popup, they think kids won't put in they were born 5 years earlier. >

Click the article :) >

and ask your mom or dad >

They didn’t before?
/s >

Banning porn? How are kids supposed to learn about sex then?? Sex education classes? Porn is how I learned about the birds and the bees as a teen.  I would bet teen pregnancy rates in the state will go up because of this law. >

Church. >

This is barely making the news somehow >

Say what >

It’s good to see that some momentum is gaining on limiting porn. Also amazing to see the amount of comments seemingly encouraging children’s access to porn. Tbh pretty damn disgusting - y’all should be ashamed.