>

Sigh this stupid attention seeking Tik Toker is taking away attention from the real case. It's frustrating having to search for "University of Idaho Murders" - TikTok - TikToker when searching for new legit updates...
Okay hold on; she publicly accused a random woman of murder, did so as a statement of fact, AND added on top of it that this random woman was sleeping with a student. I'm no lawyer but at this point she's gotta be trying to get sued on purpose LOL. wackos >

She also claimed to have physical evidence. She's not well. Watching her TikTok's is like peeking into someone's manic episode, but she's been like this for quite a while. >

If she has physical evidence of this crime then she is somehow involved in the crime or knows somebody who is connected to this crime and has withheld the evidence from police. She is not mentally well and I assume she has no idea of the implication of her statements. >

I’ve browsed her accounts and people have told her that if she has physical evidence the cops NEED to hear about it or else she could be charged…her response was basically that the cops can “wait like everyone else” until she’s gotten to say what she wants to and they can’t force her to do anything. She’s genuinely delusional >


"I am actually gleaming with excitement," she said. "I'm going to immediately start planning because I cannot wait to present my ideas in court regarding Rebecca Scofield and her role in the murder of the four University of Idaho students."

This does not seem to be the best way to approach being sued for defamation… but what do I know? >

It’s going to be a fun day when she finds out the court doesn’t give two shits about her “ideas”. >

This lady is absolutely delusional. Ive been following her "readings" before the lawsuit was announced. She wholeheartedly believes what she says, this is no act. I looked into her past, and if you read the previews on her books "dr3am" and forwards from "personification of beauty", it literally reads like the incoherent ramblings of past psych patients ive dealt with. No substance, all just filler wording.   
The interesting part is in one of her dedications, she calls out a friend, passive aggressively thanking her for saying that "she lived in fantasy land" (im assuming this was a concerned friend attempting to bring her back to reality?).. It was meant as a "fuck you" somehow? Because apparently getting some bs publisher to sell your shitty motivational essay book over amazon is validation? Considering it was years ago, all it proves was that shes very neurotic, insecure, and hold grudges for YEARS.   
Even on her fb public profile, she thinks the fact the world is "witnessing her" rn is basically divine approval. That this is in accordance to her goals. Which hey, if going viral for all the wrong goals was HER goal, she could have said some taboo shit a lot earlier. This MAY be a really sad attempt at "any PR is good PR" but i do think shes batshit insane and believes her crazy readings. She has a brother who seems pretty high up in the army, and supposedly has a military history herself in Afghanistan. Im not going to be the one to call bullshit until i see a dd214, but i think theres a good chance she has PTSD and is creating a different reality in her mind to cope. Whatever the issue is, it appears that they have been brewing for some time and are not a recent manic episode. >

You don't need a publisher to get a book on Amazon.
I can put one up right now with just "poopityscoop" repeated infinitely over 200 pages and amazon will produce it and sell it on their Plattform. The bar is that low. >

This is true, my friend published his own ICP fan fiction while we were in high school. Had a pretty nice paperback cover and everything. >

I’m crying lol who asked for this? What’s the target market? Juggalos who read?! >

Maybe there are a few who really want to know how magnets work. >

No one spoil the ending for me, I’m still on the second chapter >

The book was poorly written. It was obvious from the first chapter that the clowns were insane the whole time and didn’t even need the posse. >

The real posse was the insane clowns we met along the way 😊 >

Just because social media gives the village idiot a bullhorn, they are no less the village idiot. >

Social media gave the idiots their own village >

Social medias gave the idiots means to pool their idiocy >

That is the real danger.  25 years ago if you were an unfuckable loser you just found the 2nd ugliest guy in town and got really into the Insane Clown Posse.  Now you have a whole online support network convincing you it is the jews or feminists or liberals who are preventing you from getting a nice wife and 2.5 kids with a house, and not the global spread of unregulated capitalism that took that from you. >

I agree but how tf do you have half a child?? >

Lightsaber accident >

She's not an "internet detective" making these claims, they are PSYCHIC claims, which makes it more unhinged. The article only alludes to this near the end mentioning she is a tarot reader.
This professor is not a public figure so the bar for defamation is very low. If you publish 40+ videos saying someone is a murderer yr gonna get in trouble. >

And she kept doing it after the professor sent her a cease and desist with evidence she wasn’t in Idaho at the time of the murders. She’s gonna lose big time. >

I feel like she's going to represent herself on this. That, or her lawyer is PISSED that she kept posting about it. >

It doesn't sound like she would represent herself very well. 
"I am actually gleaming with excitement," she said. "I'm going to immediately start planning because I cannot wait to present my ideas in court regarding Rebecca Scofield and her role in the murder of the four University of Idaho students." >

HA!  The judge is going to end that bullshitery right quick. Because tarot card readings are not recognized as evidence in a court of law. >

Hopefully the judge holds her in contempt of court and throws her in a jail cell if she starts spouting bullshit. >

can you be held in contempt during a civil suit? >

Yes, of course. The judge has fairly broad powers to hold anyone in their courtroom in contempt. If they are told to stop doing something and continue they can be held in contempt. I mean, I already hold them in contempt, but they can be legally held that way, too. >

I think that holding someone in contempt isn’t a punishment, but a tool to enforce decorum. So once the problem is corrected, the contempt is lifted.
But also contempt can be held for up to 180 days. >

What happens at 180 days if you continue to fuck around? >

She watched Matlock in a bar last night. The sound wasn't on, but she thinks she got the gist of it. >

I miss Phil Hartman. >

You might remember him from other such shows as News Radio and Saturday Night Live! >

You sure made a monkey out of me. >

I’d like to ask for a bad….trial thingy >

"Oh sure, Lawyers work in a building and have secretaries! Look at 'em: He's wearing a belt. That's Hollywood for ya!" >

The part about her being a tarot card reader should've been in the first paragraph. >

I also feel that this is a crucial factor in the whole mess. >

She must’ve not seen Alex Jones being juiced for all he’s worth. See her in court >

Most “psychics” are just con artists, they might slightly buy into their own grift to justify their actions. This woman was threatened with legal action multiple times and she refused to stop even as her own followers were asking her to stop posting about it. 
There’s obviously some serious mental problems at play here, this is the type of person who should probably be banned from using the internet for their own protection. >

You can get rid of the word “most” >

I think the point they're trying to make is that there are "psychics" who really believe they are psychic. At which point, it's noy a grift. It's a delusion. I think they're probably right about this one being delusional that she's psychic. >

How did this idiot even connect all these dots? Like what’s her theory here and how’d she focus on this one professor? >

It's going to sound like a joke, but this is 100% what happened. She claimed that during a tarot reading, the "spirits" were telling her that a teacher was involved in the murders, and that the cards kept saying the word "history". So she looked at the University website, found the History department and accused the very first teacher on the page. >

My mum somehow found out about this and couldn’t understand how she picked this woman. When I told her this, she spent the next 5 minutes going ‘but no, how did she REALLY name her?’ I had to go find the video and show her before she’d believe me. >

Do you happen to have the link? Because I’m in the same place as your mom right now. >

Just the two of you? >

They can make it if they try >

Future children of the world. Please learn from this person not to do the same to others. She's in for a big life lesson. >

She's about to grow up real fast. >

People like this rarely mature out of it. 
Source: gestures to general surroundings >

They don't hold up well in court. >

"A tarot card reader focusing on unsolved "mysteries," per her TikTok description". 
This bitch better get her finances in order cause she is gunna be broke AF soon. >

Strange how those cards didn’t warn her about this. >

I would be interested to see how this tiktoker reacts in  an actual court settings with all of the legal formalities to see her  process. I wonder if it would be conveyed in valid points or if it would be like watching a street preacher yell at people >

Welcome to the game of Life Has Consequences.
It's not often someone has to declare bankruptcy in their 20s. >

Good, fuck these internet detective assholes. >

She's even worse than the average internet detective, she is making these claims based on a tarot card reading she did. >

And after the professor showed she wasn’t even in the state when the murders happened >

Well, her magic cards and her thoughts say that the professor did it.
Can't be that tarot is...well...absolutely nothing and that her ideas are wrong.  Obviously the professor is lying and the facts are wrong. >

Cards can’t lie but a professor can! - this lady >

This idiot is going to get sacked for hundreds of thousands. Consequences speed-running. I’d want this person in debt for life. >

Lookout for the GoFundMe legal defense fund >

That should net her $3 and a half empty pack of Juicy Fruit. >

Actually a half of pack of pre-chewed juicy fruit >

I can’t wait to see her get destroyed in court. She did this for clout and attention, ruining someones life by basing her “knowledge” from tarot cards. I hope the professor drains her dry. >

The tarot reader didn’t see that one coming! >

The tarot reader is hoping that the attention from the trial will bring her opportunities for reality tv, advertisement, etc. LOL >

She only hopes, because there’s a greater chance than 0% that this will work. It’s sad this actually work. >

This tiktoker has a Hollywood idea of court. "I am glowing. I can't wait to go over my theories related to the murder." That's not how that works, sweetheart. This is a defamation case, not your chance to solve what no one else could. The Professor's legal team will have a ball with this case. >

She absolutely could win a legal case of defamation by showing that the professor did the crime. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation.
There's just one problem - you need real evidence and you need to prove that truth to the standard of evidence of the court, which in a civil trial I do believe is a preponderance of the evidence. So, good luck with that, Miss tarot reading loonie >

Nothing worse than attention whoring internet detectives. >

This is the sad state of social media these days.
How can someone accuse and make claims about finding who the murderer is, by reading some Tarot cards... It's baffling.
I've used Tarot quite a lot, and it has nothing to do with predicting anything. For those that believe in that stuff, it's simply a set of cards with archetypes/images that helps one push their Intuition a little further; the cards themselves are just pretty pieces of paper, nothing else.
It's all fun and games when you want to do silly stuff like horoscope or an innocent question, even if only for the entertainment factor. But to claim you can see in those cards who the murderer is, and disrespect both this poor teacher as well as the victims/families, just horrible.
And people will, sadly, believe such claims without a single % of proof, let alone substantial proof. >

And then the dumb bitch doubles down and says "she can't wait to present her ideas in court". People like this drive me mad. It's obvious the professor had nothing to do this, she wasn't even in town the night it happened. I hope this "tarot based" true crime dipshit gets her ass handed to her. >

Courts prefer evidence to ideas. Hope she isn't fed up by the words objection and sustained. >

If she goes in there representing herself, she will have a meltdown how the judge is just ignoring all her 'facts' and 'ideas' >

I hope she bankrupts this tik tok terrorist. >

It’s a dangerous thing to mistake speaking without thought for speaking the truth >

Are you calling me dangerous..? >

I guess we'll see >

"Tarot Card Reader" aka con artist >

Yep, she's no different than the "psychics" who show up to help police departments solve crimes. >

Well shes not going to a police station. Yet. To help. >

But the tarot reader got so many clicks on tiktok, she must be right  /s >

I'm a joker
I'm a smoker
I'm a midnight tik-toker >

Yooooo this girl needs to be checked for mental health issues. The fact she is excited and wants to present “ideas” tells me something isn’t right with the young woman. Honestly the professor she sue the girl for everything. I hope they check out this girls mental health. She’s unhinged >

Please represent yourself you crazy loon… the entertainment alone will be off the charts! >

I hope she wins. I've had enough of people making a living off of false claims made on the internet. It's irresponsible, dangerous, and preys upon the feeble-minded. There's enough injustice in the world already without this shitty behavior. >

Her tarot cards didn't predict this was coming >

This whack job really posted multiple videos on social media accusing the professor of not only murder but sex with a student?! What a lunatic. She should be locked up that's a huge risk to the professors safety. >

Hahaha this tiktoker is gonna be surprised as hell when she gets in front of a judge. Hope she's making money off her tiktoks or whatever. So the professor can sue the hell outta her for every dime she has earned spouting crazy shit. >

What you say online isn't PRIVATE, people, it's PUBLIC. Despite your statements being made on a privately owned platform, you can indeed be held liable for them, since they are widely shared with the world.
That makes lawsuits like this perfectly appropriate. >

Well, she didn't say it, the Tarot cards did. Checkmate! >

True Crimers are out of control >

Is this the same crazy lady that quit Q? If so, she is nuts. This professor might win without saying a word in court. She will irritate every single person she comes in contact with.
Edit- It is not her, but someone linked the Quitting Q lady in the thread below. Out of this world. >

I'm equal parts curious who would be too crazy for Q, and pretty sure my blood pressure doesn't need to find out by being exposed to their drivel. >

What.
the.
fuck.
Did.
I.
Just.
Watch.
Orbs?  ET transmissions? I'm sooooooo glad I don't know what any of those words means. >

I think the Orbs is the random dust you see floating up from her computer fan. Guess she thinks they are spirits or aliens or something. >

Ah yes, it was 100% the professor who didn’t know any of the victims personally and wasn’t even in the same state during the murders that did it. The tarot cards can’t lie officers. >

Once someone gets through to her how much this will screw up her life, she'll go on a "it was a joke!" and try to paint the professor as a 'Karen' for not forgiving her. >

We as a society need to seriously start reckoning with the fact that social media platforms are empowering mentally ill, particularly narcissistic personalities and how dangerous that is for society as a whole. >

So, another Alex Jones?  Fuck these imbeciles. >

Jumping in on the defamation train, are we sure it’s not the Moscow Wizard? Been a while since I’ve been in the area and no idea if he’s even still around but the lore on that guy was crazy. >

"she can't wait to present her ideas in court"
I wonder what advice her layer will giver on that one ? >

"A tarot card reader focusing on unsolved "mysteries," per her TikTok description,"
-yeah, screw this Tiktok septic tank of lies, hope she goes to jail for defamation and is bankrupted like Alex Jones >

I still blame Nancy Grace with creating the feeding frenzy of high profile cases. Awful pandering. >

I would go scorched earth on her ass. No settlement out of court. I would so make an example of her. Hopefully the lady has a bulldog lawyer who is as pissed off as she is. >

This is where social network can do untold damage to a person accused.  Hope the professor prevail in lawsuit. >

I don’t know who is dumber, this psychic or her followers. She actually has people who believe her >

Talk about 'unclear on the concept'. She can't wait to present her ideas in court.
Sorry, but court is where you present evidence, not ideas. I hope you are ruined and have to get a real job you grifting slime. >

I hit on that too.  Especially because she'll be there to defend herself against defamation, not present about a murder.  I think she thinks she'll get a chance to stand up and be like here's why I think she did it. >

Perhaps she'll call her expert witnesses Drs Dunning and Krueger. >


A tarot card reader focusing on unsolved "mysteries," per her TikTok description...

What an asshole >

‘ I am actually gleaming with excitement," she said. "I'm going to immediately start planning because I cannot wait to present my ideas in court regarding Rebecca Scofield and her role in the murder of the four University of Idaho students.’
That.. is not what the courts case is for- and it’s not going to go well for her.  
I hope she get her ass handed to her. >

"I am actually gleaming with excitement," [the defendant] said. "I'm going to immediately start planning because I cannot wait to present my ideas in court regarding Rebecca Scofield and her role in the murder of the four University of Idaho students."
Uh yeah. You want a lawyer first. >

Defamation is easy to prove if you’re a private citizen, pretty stupid to do this shit on tiktok for some clout over your fake psychic powers >

Truly appalling.  She could motivate someone to harm this professor. There needs to be Stronger protection in these situations. The brutal attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband is a sad example. >

The professor did get threats as a result of these false claims. >

I love when tiktok shitheads get smoked >

Looks like someone's going to get a reality check. >

I vet enormous "I choose to represent myself energy" off the idiot. She's gonna get cleaned out. And good. Fuck her. >

Dr. Grande just did a very thorough piece about this and I will always seize an opportunity to share some Dr. Grande! 
“TikTok psychic uses Idaho murders to falsely accuse professor” >

After watching the full video I rule in favour of the plaintiff. >

I get the internet sleuths.  It fun to be in on the action.  The more successful ones have proven people innocent. 
If you go around accusing people though, that's where you run into issues. >

Ashley belongs in jail. She appears to be deeply delusional based on her tik Tok vids. >

Good. More people should sue TikTokers for being fucking idiots. The world would be a better place. >

Somehow I feel the the fact she’s a gender studies professor and this is Idaho we’re talking about are connected. Smear a professor you don’t ideologically agree with. >

Tik Toker has reached out to Rudy Guiliani and Sidney Powell to represent her after consulting with My Pillow. >

Are they going to hold a press conference at Four Seasons Total Landscaping again? >

She seems mentally ill. What a wacko! >

Tiktok is riddled with many of these accusations. The entire platform has become obsessed with this event its insane i had to block every person i came across. Theres people allegedly contacting the deceased through radios getting their confessions. >

Ah yes, TikTok psychics. They’re like Witchcraft TikTok where they post videos with circumstantial evidences or commonly disproved “facts” >

Social media was a mistake. >

The internet detectives don’t have police immunity >

The cards tell me that The Psychic Internet Detective™ is going to lose this one hard. >

The internet has given potential for the mentally ill and completely ludicrous to become exponentially heard, and it's not a good thing. Misinformation like this hurts people. You used to have weird uncles into conspiracies or some estranged aunt who believed she knew who did the town mystery, now you're gonna get everyone in the bumfuck nowhere fabricating evidence or pulling from horrible sources to back up their bullshit claims targeting wanton individuals with laser precision because they can look up nearly every chunk of information about them.
Pandora's box is opened, this shit is only gonna get worse as the world gets worse and mental illness goes untreated with people being even more at-risk with every cent scraped from their overworked bones >

I am so damn sick of psychics spewing their bullshit and getting away with it. They are disgusting vultures trying to leech off others tragedy and pretend they have some magical insight. And, even worse, there are people actually believe their bullshit enough to act on it.
On a side note, I know Kendall Rae is a popular true crime content creator and she is usually better about being respectful of victims and contacting the families, but she believes psychics are legit. She has 3.5 million subscribers and she pushes the horrendous view that some psychics are legit and can solve murder cases. It seems insanely irresponsible. It's already bad enough that peoples tragedies are viewed as entertainment by so many but people shouldn't be giving psychics any leniency when they insert themselves into murders or missing peoples cases. Period. The fact there are actually people who believe what they say is truth make me feel like I'm going insane. >

This lady is dumb af it’s not like it’s in the movies. I hope she gets a heavy dose of reality and gets help if she does need it. >

Oh God, I hope she represents herself in court. She's sounds looney as hell. >

Wannabe internet celebrities and influencers need to familiarize themselves with defamation law before popping off and publishing their ideas. Major newspapers retain lawyers for good reason. >

"A tarot card reader focusing on unsolved "mysteries," per her TikTok description"
Yeah, you're gonna get sued into oblivion. Way too many online personalities have no clue how libel/slander/defamation of character works and they think they have carte blanche to say whatever they want because of their online account.
"The lawsuit also alleges that Guillard continued to post defamatory comments about Scofield online after receiving two cease and desist letters from the professor."
The fact she ignored two of those is really going to get her slammed in court.
"Guillard's videos about the Idaho murders typically garner tens of thousands of views from other social media users on the platform, and they have implicated Jack DuCoeur, the ex-boyfriend of Goncalves, who police say has been cleared as a potential suspect, in addition to Scofield."
The fact those videos have all those views will play into the monetary damages too as it's way more people that have heard those rumors than if the Guillard was just telling a couple friends.
Source: I spent 14 years as a news cameraman and sat through yearly 4-hour legal seminars for 11 of those years having it pounded into our heads on how to not get the station sued. >

Yo someone remind me of the jail time this trash bag gets in 6 months. >

Tiktok - is for morons >

This happens on every social media, spend 5mins on r/conspiracy and see what outlet these sites give for crazy people >

That’s the domain of deranged and mentally unstable people who found social media and Tic-Toc in particular to be a great outlet for their problems. 
They can say anything they want, including the most outrageous declarations and get more and more exposure and attention. Perfect. >

Never forget when Reddit accused the wrong guy of being the Boston bomber. It’s not a TikTok problem. >

Heck, it's not even an internet problem. >

Can't wait for Tik Tok to be totally banned.  Just Straight F.I .S >

Can't wait for this woman to come on Reddit and start her own subreddit /s >

Too late
r/MoscowMurders >

Talk about having a personal vendetta against a professor. Must have given her a bad grade at some point. >

She never even went to the university. >

Good! The Tik tokers are absurd >

I think the title should read: "Professor sues TikTok insane Tarrot card reader, internet sleuth who accused her of Idaho murders." >

She is not afraid, she knows the future. Must be very convenient. >

I feel bad for her upcoming cell mate. >

Good for her! I hope she gets millions.