>

I’m ADD and dyslexic, so if I’m uninterested in the topic but still have to understand it, audiobooks are actually my only option. When a paragraph about something I’m not interested in, I couldn’t tell you what was in it to save my life. So for some people, maybe, but for me specifically, no. If I can’t read it, I have to listen to it, and I can’t do just that, I have to be doing something with my hands, too.
How do you know? >

This was my first question. How many people has OP interviewed to hold this opinion? >

There’s been multiple studies done on it already. >

Even if true, which it isn't.... still better than not doing either. >

It is true actually. There’s been studies on this. People that only listen to something are less likely to remember it. >

I'd like to see the studies on that.... >

Then google it. >

Sorry I didn't catch that, could you speak into my ear instead? >

I do. But I can only speak as someone with ADHD. When I read, my mind can still drift. It's hard to explain, but I'm reading the words, but my mind is elsewhere and not absorbing the info. I have to read the same passage a few times. 
Somehow, listening to the info and doing something else with my hands helps. >

Yes this. Because when the adhd brain has something to listen to the sound can help drown out our racing thoughts that often lead to massive distraction >

excellent! Thanks. >

Socrates hated books because you learned better by listening and/or asking questions. >

Oh ho ho. OP you are statistically incorrect. 
There's no stat difference in retention or comprehension between audiobook or actually reading. So yknow....happy listening