>

"Oh sure, Lawyers work in a building and have secretaries! Look at 'em: He's wearing a belt. That's Hollywood for ya!"
Okay hold on; she publicly accused a random woman of murder, did so as a statement of fact, AND added on top of it that this random woman was sleeping with a student. I'm no lawyer but at this point she's gotta be trying to get sued on purpose LOL. wackos >

She also claimed to have physical evidence. She's not well. Watching her TikTok's is like peeking into someone's manic episode, but she's been like this for quite a while. >

If she has physical evidence of this crime then she is somehow involved in the crime or knows somebody who is connected to this crime and has withheld the evidence from police. She is not mentally well and I assume she has no idea of the implication of her statements. >

I’ve browsed her accounts and people have told her that if she has physical evidence the cops NEED to hear about it or else she could be charged…her response was basically that the cops can “wait like everyone else” until she’s gotten to say what she wants to and they can’t force her to do anything. She’s genuinely delusional >


"I am actually gleaming with excitement," she said. "I'm going to immediately start planning because I cannot wait to present my ideas in court regarding Rebecca Scofield and her role in the murder of the four University of Idaho students."

This does not seem to be the best way to approach being sued for defamation… but what do I know? >

It’s going to be a fun day when she finds out the court doesn’t give two shits about her “ideas”. >

This lady is absolutely delusional. Ive been following her "readings" before the lawsuit was announced. She wholeheartedly believes what she says, this is no act. I looked into her past, and if you read the previews on her books "dr3am" and forwards from "personification of beauty", it literally reads like the incoherent ramblings of past psych patients ive dealt with. No substance, all just filler wording.   
The interesting part is in one of her dedications, she calls out a friend, passive aggressively thanking her for saying that "she lived in fantasy land" (im assuming this was a concerned friend attempting to bring her back to reality?).. It was meant as a "fuck you" somehow? Because apparently getting some bs publisher to sell your shitty motivational essay book over amazon is validation? Considering it was years ago, all it proves was that shes very neurotic, insecure, and hold grudges for YEARS.   
Even on her fb public profile, she thinks the fact the world is "witnessing her" rn is basically divine approval. That this is in accordance to her goals. Which hey, if going viral for all the wrong goals was HER goal, she could have said some taboo shit a lot earlier. This MAY be a really sad attempt at "any PR is good PR" but i do think shes batshit insane and believes her crazy readings. She has a brother who seems pretty high up in the army, and supposedly has a military history herself in Afghanistan. Im not going to be the one to call bullshit until i see a dd214, but i think theres a good chance she has PTSD and is creating a different reality in her mind to cope. Whatever the issue is, it appears that they have been brewing for some time and are not a recent manic episode. >

You don't need a publisher to get a book on Amazon.
I can put one up right now with just "poopityscoop" repeated infinitely over 200 pages and amazon will produce it and sell it on their Plattform. The bar is that low. >

This is true, my friend published his own ICP fan fiction while we were in high school. Had a pretty nice paperback cover and everything. >

I’m crying lol who asked for this? What’s the target market? Juggalos who read?! >

Maybe there are a few who really want to know how magnets work. >

No one spoil the ending for me, I’m still on the second chapter >

The book was poorly written. It was obvious from the first chapter that the clowns were insane the whole time and didn’t even need the posse. >

The real posse was the insane clowns we met along the way 😊 >

Just because social media gives the village idiot a bullhorn, they are no less the village idiot. >

Social media gave the idiots their own village >

Social medias gave the idiots means to pool their idiocy >

That is the real danger.  25 years ago if you were an unfuckable loser you just found the 2nd ugliest guy in town and got really into the Insane Clown Posse.  Now you have a whole online support network convincing you it is the jews or feminists or liberals who are preventing you from getting a nice wife and 2.5 kids with a house, and not the global spread of unregulated capitalism that took that from you. >

I agree but how tf do you have half a child?? >

Lightsaber accident >

She's not an "internet detective" making these claims, they are PSYCHIC claims, which makes it more unhinged. The article only alludes to this near the end mentioning she is a tarot reader.
This professor is not a public figure so the bar for defamation is very low. If you publish 40+ videos saying someone is a murderer yr gonna get in trouble. >

And she kept doing it after the professor sent her a cease and desist with evidence she wasn’t in Idaho at the time of the murders. She’s gonna lose big time. >

I feel like she's going to represent herself on this. That, or her lawyer is PISSED that she kept posting about it. >

It doesn't sound like she would represent herself very well. 
"I am actually gleaming with excitement," she said. "I'm going to immediately start planning because I cannot wait to present my ideas in court regarding Rebecca Scofield and her role in the murder of the four University of Idaho students." >

HA!  The judge is going to end that bullshitery right quick. Because tarot card readings are not recognized as evidence in a court of law. >

Hopefully the judge holds her in contempt of court and throws her in a jail cell if she starts spouting bullshit. >

can you be held in contempt during a civil suit? >

Yes, of course. The judge has fairly broad powers to hold anyone in their courtroom in contempt. If they are told to stop doing something and continue they can be held in contempt. I mean, I already hold them in contempt, but they can be legally held that way, too. >

I think that holding someone in contempt isn’t a punishment, but a tool to enforce decorum. So once the problem is corrected, the contempt is lifted.
But also contempt can be held for up to 180 days. >

What happens at 180 days if you continue to fuck around? >

She watched Matlock in a bar last night. The sound wasn't on, but she thinks she got the gist of it. >

I miss Phil Hartman. >

You might remember him from other such shows as News Radio and Saturday Night Live! >

You sure made a monkey out of me. >

I’d like to ask for a bad….trial thingy