>

Let's not. I would rather have someone with the sense and not get themselves into that situation in the first place. She wasn't going to say anything until they forced her to lie to the committee. Not to mention, she's still a Republican.
“And yet what has kept Trump afloat for so long, what has helped him evade ruin and prosecution, is perhaps his most salient quality: he is shameless. That is the never-apologize-never-explain core of him. Trump is hardly the first dishonest President, the first incurious President, the first liar. But he is the most shameless. His contrition is impossible to conceive. He is insensible to disgrace.”
This is why his cult will never survive. Why I will never trust or like any of them ever again.  Damn them all. >

I hate them one and all, damn their eyes >

All republicans are worthless to me anymore.  Each and every one of them are rude, whiny, engage in toddler-ass name calling, and spend every fuxin minute of every fcxing day bitching about everything. >

Yep. The entire party is responsible and the orange stain won’t wash off of them for decades. >

After Nixon’s disgrace everybody thought the republicans were done for decades at least. One election cycle later Reagan was elected in a landslide and a cult was built around him that lasted 36 years until 2016. Unlike Nixon, Reagan’s crimes were celebrated and his lawbreaking minion Oliver North became a hero. 
Don’t underestimate the stupidity of the American people. >

I'd encourage everyone to read the actual report, which you can find as a PDF here.
Yes, it's 845 pages, but at least a third of those pages are endnotes (which mostly just specify which exact interview a quote comes from). The report's text is easily readable. And it's damned important! >

Yesss I’m on page like 380 or something- can confirm it’s a FAST read for an 845 page doc lol >

My wife says the DOJ should indict him for something (the most provable charge of any of the possible charges) on January 6 2023. I agree and when DOJ does it promise a Superseding indictment with all charges to come soon. >

Paywall >


from his Attorney General to his daughter, know the depths of his vainglorious delusions.

This whole article is riddled with nonsense like this. We get it: you own a thesaurus. >

What's wrong with using the best word for the idea you want to convey? >

It’s not the one word, it’s the whole article. It reminds me of this: 

Loquaciousness: That would be garrulousness, verboseness, effusiveness. How about "chattiness"?

A predilection by the intelligentsia to engage in the manifestation of prolix exposition through a buzzword disposition form of communication notwithstanding the availability of more comprehensible, punctiliously applicable, diminutive alternatives. Also known as "gross verbosity". >

Fox “News” is primarily responsible for the polarization of the American polity. So long as it and its ilk are allowed to spew mis- and disinformation under the rubric of “news”, the rift in the nation will never heal. >

One can criticize law enforcement when they go out of uniform in unmarked vans and grab people up without identifying themselves as police, and also praise the Capitol Police and Secret Service for saving your life, the two are not incompatible views. >

Yeah is this some sort of gotcha? I don't even understand why they posted it. It has nothing to do with the situation, and is a terrible comparison. >

This is a nice break from something unrelated that happened once, 2 and a half years ago. >

When people bring up something completely unrelated like that when January 6th is the issue i just assume they support what happened on January 6th and they just want to derail the discussion about it because the more information people find out about what actually happened the worse it is. >


Dead horse but NYT will beat it for every left wing nutcase.

Good God.... You didn't even get the source right...
And it's literally right in front of you. >

When you’ve never read a real news source they all kind of blend together.