>

Doesn’t conditional aid fail because they agree to terms and then the warlords just take resources and ignore promises until it’s time to rinse and repeat?
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 72%. (I'm a bot)


Major world powers have called on the Taliban to urgently reverse a "Reckless and dangerous" decision to ban women from working for aid agencies and charities.
In a joint statement, foreign ministers from 12 countries, as well as an EU representative, warned the ban on women working in non-governmental organisations would have an inevitable impact on UN aid programmes because many of these multimillion-dollar relief efforts were delivered and designed by NGOs.
"The Taliban continue to demonstrate their contempt for the rights, freedoms, and welfare of the Afghan people, particularly women and girls, and their disinterest in normal relations with the international community," the statement read. "[We] are in close contact with the United Nations, who are urging, also on behalf of all international donors, that the Taliban reverse this decision immediately.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: women^#1 aid^#2 Taliban^#3 international^#4 Afghanistan^#5 >

Taliban : your concern has been noted 
What are you gonna do ban our Twitter? >

It is high time (well past time, actually) for the entire world to wash its hands of Afghanistan entirely.  All previous efforts at aid and assistance should be re-directed to assisting the escape and re-settlement of all individuals who wish to escape that irredeemable hellhole. >

Re-settle them where? Afghanistan has a population of 40 million people lol. >

Unfortunately most of them are ok with state of affairs. Resettling ones wishing to leave would not be all that difficult. >

Stop talking out your ass. As someone who has worked there and is in close contact with people I've worked with there, the state of affairs is beyond horrendous for almost the entire population. Almost nobody likes it, except for the top Talibs in power. >

They had all the means to resist the taliban, if they didn’t it’s because they didn’t want. >

The worlds top military tried to help for 20 years and couldn’t >

They won't - What you gonna do? >

A few things come to mind:
borderline ignore
conditional aid(bribe),
sanctions,
back opponents to regime(diplomatically, financially, militarily),
occupy (again...),
drone strikes,
sabotage,
assassinate someone important(I dunno if that would really halt them that much),
nuke(might be a bit of an overreaction)
Not a lot of those are appealing or effective, so the likely course of action is to just sort of let them be whilst nudging and teasing it where you can, and hope that the situation improves it self.
Diplomacy is a complex and nuanced art, of which I know very little, so I'm sure there are more nuanced ways for changing a country situation externally(if you want too).