>

Not enough zeros in that number. Also, she should pay, not her campaign.
Should be paid out of her own pocket rather than her campaign. >

She should face charges for trying to use state assets to reverse an election. >

Treason used to have more severe consequences >

Until it became a staple of the GQP. >

As much as it pains me to say it, not throwing people out of helicopters is a part of what makes good people good people. What a fucking world we’ve made, hey?
I wouldn’t mind if they were left to their own devices, e.g. if we stopped funding failed red state governance with blue state taxpayer dollars, which would have the same effect by a far more moral mechanism. >

I've always liked the idea of withholding federal benefits from states whose senators vote against them. >

As someone who grew up in Texas, if that ever happened Texas would go bankrupt after a natural disaster.   The chuckle twins of Canadian Ted and Cornyn love to grandstand about budget responsibility and always vote against aid for other states, but fuck me if ANYTHING remotely bad ever happens in Texas they beg like crackheads for federal aid and relief funds. >

Well I think it is annoying to see them vote against things and then brag about the money they bring in from a bill they voted against.
But if they had to lose the money by not supporting the bill we'd see more good faith votes (or ideally angry voters getting better candidates in). >

Let's be 100% real. None of that would happen. You'd just have them spin it as "Democrats want you to starve and die. How disgusting and vile." and yeah, that'd be about it. Election would come and Ted Cruz would be back right where he was because y'all like to get fucked sideways down there by your power grid and everyone voted into power. >

This headline, while accurate, is misleading. Hobbs and Maricopa County were seeking an additional $700k in reimbursement from Lake, which the judge did not grant. I'm assuming taxpayers will be covering that. Party of fiscal responsibility and all that. Still, Arizona's taxpayers are getting quite a deal when compared to the more than $200 million California's had to waste on the sad recall attempt of Gov. Newsom. >

We've already paid $90 million or so on Ducey's container "wall." >

You mean the one with the gaps because of the hilly terrain? >

Correct the one that has already been cut through in multiple places and the border patrol hates because it reduces visibility around the border. >

$90m for a blind spot >

75 million for a publicity stunt towards the right. 15 million for grifting if we're being generous here in assuming they didn't pocket more of it. >

How many L’s can she take? >

Hey, someone's gotta hold the world record. If she wants to continually embarrass herself on every possible level and become a joke for the history books, alright. >

she's got a long way to go to catch up to Donald... >

She could sell worthless NFTs of herself as a fictional action figure. >

Make sure to first steal the images from small clothing companies and then photoshop them to celebrate the achievements you never actually accomplished. >

Her moon landing? >

I was wondering who left their knock off Prada bag up there. Wait, this photo looks shopped. The shadows are wrong. >

Flags are never that stiff. 
^(And neither is her husband.) >

She will do like Trump always does, beg supporters to pay her costs, which like the dumb sheep they are will gladly throw their money down the drain on another lying clown >

Wait till you find out about this guy named trump >

He's the losingest loser who ever won. >

He's talking about the election, not the popular vote. (In 2016.) The popular vote  roughly correlates with election results, but I think by now everyone is excruciatingly familiar with how it differs, too. >

Good ol' gerrymandering >

In a very indirect way, I guess.
1) If you think of the states' borders as being arbitrary, sure, maybe the continent itself is gerrymandered. And it has a big effect on the election outcome.
2) Gerrymandering the districts of a state's legislature can cause that state to enact strange laws, whose purpose seems to be to discourage voting. There's a certain major party, where if they get into a state's legislature, then members of that party are known for trying to limit polling place availability, they think government should use force against anyone caught rendering aid to voters as they wait in the now-longer lines, and they might try to limit or reduce early or absentee voting. And gerrymandering helps to let those legislative failures happen. >

That’s peanuts to her. She should be forced to pay millions in punitive damages for a frivolous lawsuit. >

First comes repayment to the defendants for lawyer fees.  That sets a minimum penalty for these ridiculous republican led cases.  Perhaps in the future damages can also be applied in these cases.  It's about the only way to get the droolers to pay attention. >

All due respect, did you read the articles. She doesn’t have to pay the defendants fees. She has to pay for a few expert witnesses and whatnot. 
To be fair the title of the article is horrible and it buried the lead. >

Yes. Journalism uses intentionally misspelled words as lingo to differentiate from usual uses of the word. So “lede” to refer to the introduction of the main story line. Usually it’s part of the first graf or two but there have been some publications that sometimes used a more narrative style of writing and would push the lede down in the story. >

The punitive damages for frivolous lawsuits really needs to be given more teeth.
33k? Thats nothing to these people. She probably made x10 that in donations during her clownshow of a lawsuit. >

it's pronounced lolsuit. >

Add at least 2 zeros to prevent future frivolous lawsuits. >

Terrible headline. She won her appeal to avoid paying 700k against her defense for a frivolous case, and the 33k is just to pay for experts she called to testify on her behalf. This is a loss for justice, not a victory. >

Lol
Try again Kari maybe this time it'll work >

She won’t pay, like her orange lord >


The judge said he did not question Lake’s sincerity.
“There is no doubt that each side believes firmly in its position with great conviction,” 

Karen announced prior to the election that she would not accept and would challenge any other outcome than a win.  On what planet is that sincerity? >

Gonna put a dent in her makeup budget >

She looks like George Santos. Except Santos wears more makeup and more lip gloss.