>


Can you explain to me why you think judges don’t rule with their own biases

I am sure some do, however there is an entire appeals process to go through and they found the judge ruled fairly. So in this case it is not justified to just claim the judge is biased.
Why does the New York Democratic Party suck so bad? And I say this coming from the state with what is arguably the 2nd worst state Democratic Party, Texas. I mean, here, the state party is merely weak and completely ineffective. The NY party seems to be actively anti-Democratic Party. >

If you start your opinion with “Judges rule according to the law, not according to politics” you’re already wrong. I don’t know how this country got convinced that judges are apolitical neutral parties that can only determine a single answer that’s totally fair always, all judges interpret the laws through their own biases, left and right. Judges are just people who happened to go to law school, not law-machines. >

And if you start with not knowing the facts of the case just assuming "Democracy Now" has no agenda you are already wrong. 
Do you know the facts of the case? I do. And the judge was right. >

As far as I know I’ve literally never looked at Democracy Now before this moment but sure, I’ll keep that in mind. Can you explain to me why you think judges don’t rule with their own biases, genuinely curious how you can reach that conclusion.