>

Aren't most Jews in America left-leaning?
The sheer number of lies this guy told that somehow were not all over the news and social media until after the election is absolutely puzzling to me.  Everything is under a microscope all the time and yet this slips through? >

I have no idea how all this crap was found out AFTER he was elected. >

NY Times did an investigation. >

(☝˘▾˘)☝ 
[12/19/2022][NY] New York Republican George Santos’s Résumé Called Into Question - The New York Times

Edit: I stand corrected. This just popped up in my feed:
[12/29/2022][NY] A tiny paper broke the George Santos scandal, but no one paid attention - The Washington Post >

This is well after the election. From what I've read, they NY Times was tipped off before the election, but didn't pursue it or give it the same amount of attn as it's getting now. Now it's everywhere >

Got a source for that? Or just speculation?

Edit: This just popped up in my feed:
[12/29/2022][NY] A tiny paper broke the George Santos scandal, but no one paid attention - The Washington Post
That paper broke their story 11/06, 3 days before Santos won District 3 on 11/09. The NY Times went to press this month, on 12/19, 43 days later with a much more in-depth and well-researched piece of investigative journalism.
Yeah, I'm really going to need to see a credible source for your contention. It is much, much more likely that the NYT learned of Santos via the North Shore Leader financial disclosure story, dove in and investigated it further and then came out with their own piece of investigative journalism, than it is likely that they were "tipped off", ignored it and got scooped by the North Shore Leader. >

I read it on another thread about Santos, but it makes sense because this isn't the first time this guy has ran for public office in NY so he would have been the attention of at least some local journalists for awhile.