>

And the truth DID come out! Well done Ginnyi!
So a solution in search of a problem, basically. They wanted Trump to win even after voters had said otherwise, and getting people killed in an insurrection was just the cheap cost of “looking for the truth.”
The whole fucking thing with this administration is they ruled like they were never going to lose re-election. They thought that little of the right of voters to render a different verdict. Working that angle it doesn’t surprise me that they decided to run a fraudulent electors scheme and send violence upon the Capitol when the election in fact didn’t go their way. Disgusting animals belong in jail. >

Attempting to defraud the American people. >

There's a process for that, and it had already happened.
61 lawsuits were filed. 9 were overseen by Trump-appointed judges. One was dismissed by The Supreme Court, and 3 of Trump's Justices.
Several of the cases didn't even allege fraud, despite Trump's lawyers claiming it in interviews.
Only ONE case succeeded, and it had nothing to do with voter fraud. It basically allowed campaign observers a better view of ballot counting.
Recounts and audits occurred. Many of them found more votes for Biden, if anything.
The 2020 election was fully adjudicated, and zero reliable claims were put forward.
If anyone is to blame for failing to uncover "the truth," it is the people vested in Trump's success, including Ginni. They failed miserably, so perhaps a mirror and some self-reflection is in order. >

The absolute last thing a Trump cult member is going to do is some self-reflection. >

Dracula does more self reflection >

The truth was he lied and she went all in.  She is lying now. >

Lying to save her skin and husband’s job. >

Her husbands job is completely secure. >

Isn't it discouraging that we have such weak-minded, vindictive people in positions of influence? >

you'd think it would be easy to outmaneuver morons, and yet it's tough to not feel on the back foot against their constant stream of bullshit >

They flood the zone. It's a strategic move. They are getting more and more desperate as the demographics continue to shift away from the right wing. >


more and more desperate 

And more and more dangerous. >

She turned me into a newt! >

…I got better. >

Oh good. We found it out: more people voted for Biden. 
Good luck with your marriage to a porn addicted minority hating piece of shit >

She hates minorities too, that's what brought these two darlings together in the first place.  With her, the porn is revenge porn. >

Aww. True love wins >


Conservative activist Ginni Thomas spoke about her post-2020 election activity and interactions with Trump officials in her interview with the Jan. 6 committee, according to her testimony, which was made publicly available Friday.  
Driving the news: Thomas said she hoped that Trump's White House would "challenge the election until the truth could be found out if there was evidence of state problems in the election."  
Thomas told the committee that she "hoped that state legislators could identify fraud and irregularities in a timely manner before it was too late."  
Thomas also said she didn't speak with her husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, about her volunteer campaign activities; post-election activities, which she described as "minimal in any event"; or any legal challenges to the 2020 election results, as she "was not involved in those challenges in any way."  
The big picture: Thomas became a figure of interest in the Jan. 6 committee's investigation as she was in communication with key Trump advisers about efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, per Axios' Andrew Solender. >

Another shitty right wing liar. >

Charges should be filed for attempting to defraud the American people. >

“We have the theories, we just need the evidence.” >

Actual headline: Ginni Thomas Surprisingly Bad Liar Despite Her Decades of Experience >

She didn't want truth.
She wanted time to find a way to make the lie our new reality. >

Here is her explanation of the email she forwarded.

Q: And in the post-election timeframe, did you continue to stay involved in efforts to question or challenge the results of the election?
A: I wouldn't necessarily phrase it that way. What I was doing was seeing that it was the State legislators who had power to decide if there were problems in their election.
And so I participated in a mass communication device called FreeRoots that has been I'm sure the subject of some of the conversations you guys have had and the media has been interested in.
I joined with thousands of people to push a button that sent an automatic email to 18 some State legislators that I did not choose. I did not edit that letter.

This email pressured state legislatures to pick fake electors.

Q: You've mentioned the FreeRoots emails that you didn't draft and you pushed a button to send that.
Were you involved in any other efforts in the post-election timeframe to call attention to problems with the election or to try and do something about the result of the election?
A: I can't think of anything specifically. Is there something you're thinking of?

Here is a Rick James moment that feels like perjury but probably does not meet the standard.

Q: For example, did you have any conversations with anyone in the Trump campaign regarding ... what their strategies were to challenge the election?
A: No, I did not.
Q: Any members of the Trump administration regarding efforts to challenge the result of the 2020 election?
A: No, except, you know, I can certainly look at those wonderful Mark
Meadows texts...
Q: Anyone other than Mark Meadows that you communicated with within the Trump administration regarding your concerns about the election?
A: Oh, I probably-- Jared Kushner I sent an email to hoping to buck him up on the team.  I probably sent something to Jared.

Just Mark Meadows and Jared Kusher to, you know, buck them up >

Why did this kook have access to the White House? >

Ginni Thomas just straight up admitting to treason and asking wtf is anyone ever gonna do about it 🤦🏻‍♀️ >

Bull and shit.  You of all people, Ginni dear, were quite aware that the Trump campaign lost over 60 court challenges because they had nothin'.  I doubt your hubby can explain the law to you, he doesn't know it either, but the right wingers you contacted about the "Biden crime family on a barge off of Gitmo" sure knew what you were trying to sell.  Bull and shit.  Mr. & Mrs. Bull and Shit.
And if you didn't talk to hubby about trying to overthrow your own government, I'll buy you and the fool you married dinner at the right wing nausoleum of your choice. >

What truth? Her alternate reality? >

She meant “until the lie fizzled out.” >

She wasn't waiting for the truth...  Rather the 'truth' she wanted to hear
Edit:   you know...  Those 'alternative truths' Republicans love so much >

The truth being whatever she thinks it us no doubt....
Fuck all traitors >

The truth was readily available for anyone. Trump lost. That’s it. >

Remove Clarence Thomas from the bench before it's too late to salvage the judiciary's already tattered legitimacy. >

Hope she checked that open Coke can on the counter for pubes >

They pay millions to pivot counselors. Base will gobble it up. Shameful, disgusting and utterly pathetic. >

The 'truth' meaning whatever could be gleaned from lies, conspiracy theories and, for lack of a better term, bird law. >

Man, the right wing has really ruined the word "truth" for me. Whenever they think they're saying the truth it's always a pile of 50's right wing propaganda that they're just saying is facts because they can, and whenever they think they're finding the truth it's always some wild conspiracy bullshit that just so happens to let them get back control of the government so that they can then achieve their horrid dreams of banning abortion, keeping the drug war going forever, putting LGBT people back into the closet forever unless they willingly "convert", screwing over the poor, and making society in general worse and more authoritarian. >

But not the truth truth, the other truth- an "alternate truth," one with no truth in it.
"Truth Zero" if you will. >

Question for her. Do you accept the results of 2020 election and do you believe the results to be accurate? >

Excuse me, ma’am. Mrs. Thomas, wife of a US Supreme Court Justice. This is America. We don’t have Sun Emperors here. >

She obviously can't see the truth even when is right there, staring you in the face.