>

Yeah I got confused why a bill would only interfere with a single area of California because I read L.A.
"She added that although some personal information will be required, companies must not retain personal data after complete verification."
Surely they won't. >

Even if they do, it is secured.
Even if it is secured, there won't be any breaches.
Even if there are breaches, the terms of service you agreed to will make it impossible to sue them. >

And even if you can sue them, you'll be forced into arbitration.
And even if you aren't, they'll stall it out until you run out of money, give up, die, or any combination of the above. >

Or you'll just get a check for $10 five years later from the class action. >

$10?  Look over here at Mr. Money bags.  It will be a gift certificate to Block Buster. >

I got a gift-certificate for K-mart, but only for use on items sold in a blue-light special. >

My mom worked the toys and apparel for a while I remember when I was young. She would take me in the back and show me all kids of stuff like the break room and stuff. One day she got sent home early and I was so worried she didn’t loose her job but that 9/11 happened and my brother signed up for the army afterwards I think is what happened it was a weird time in my life… my life is so much more weirder now than I ever thought it would be…. >

Is this pasta? >

The youth will have to get their porn from the woods like we all had to as kids. >

or instagram.  Instagram is literally full of soft core porn disguised as cosplay. >

A lot of social medias just have str8 up porn too, like reddit. >

We can’t just click the “yes, I’m 18” box anymore?? >

I’ve wondered when this would happen since before the first images could even download efficiently. 😅 >

gilliananderson_boobs.jpg has finished downloading.
Whew! Time to see what this is all about! >

Good gracious, I'm old enough to remember when Netscape first supported progressive jpeg downloads, over a 1200 baud modem! >

Ugh whenever someone says “I’m old enough to remember” in relation to porn I’m immediately reminded I come from the generation who grew up with African tribal women in NG and the ladies underwear section of the Sears Roebuck catalog as our earliest outlets. >

Don't forget the magazine in the woods. >

That was very much real.  The woods close to the apartments I grew up in, every summer stashed away in a few trees you could always find magazines in the trees hidden away.  Some people think it's a fable or legend, but it was real. >

Filesharing didn't begin with the internet... >

What exactly can Louisiana do to a website that isn't located in Louisiana, often not even in the US?
Several years ago I owned some adult-type websites and I would get occasional e-mails from the government of Turkey demanding that I take them down because they violated Turkish law. Not that I block Turkey but straight-up take them down. Straight to trash they went. >

Lawsuits, but I don't think they have standing for just having a website up on the internet. Stuff like GDPR where EU citizens have accounts and are doing business (using services) with US companies like FB and Twitter is an example of what can be done. >

Those laws like in EU regard actively targeting EU citizens. Simply being acessible from a region usually doesn't constitute a basis for anything. >

That's my point, the general mechanism for disputes with sites is lawsuits, what you said is why I said they wouldn't really have standing just existing in a country. >

Isn't this the same party that despises government interference?? >

Ooh, La = Louisiana
This headline now makes far more sense.