>

No Femail aid workers, no women getting healthcare.  That's probably their reasoning
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 72%. (I'm a bot)


Major world powers have called on the Taliban to urgently reverse a "Reckless and dangerous" decision to ban women from working for aid agencies and charities.
In a joint statement, foreign ministers from 12 countries, as well as an EU representative, warned the ban on women working in non-governmental organisations would have an inevitable impact on UN aid programmes because many of these multimillion-dollar relief efforts were delivered and designed by NGOs.
"The Taliban continue to demonstrate their contempt for the rights, freedoms, and welfare of the Afghan people, particularly women and girls, and their disinterest in normal relations with the international community," the statement read. "[We] are in close contact with the United Nations, who are urging, also on behalf of all international donors, that the Taliban reverse this decision immediately.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: women^#1 aid^#2 Taliban^#3 international^#4 Afghanistan^#5 >

Taliban : your concern has been noted 
What are you gonna do ban our Twitter? >

It is high time (well past time, actually) for the entire world to wash its hands of Afghanistan entirely.  All previous efforts at aid and assistance should be re-directed to assisting the escape and re-settlement of all individuals who wish to escape that irredeemable hellhole. >

Re-settle them where? Afghanistan has a population of 40 million people lol. >

Unfortunately most of them are ok with state of affairs. Resettling ones wishing to leave would not be all that difficult. >

Stop talking out your ass. As someone who has worked there and is in close contact with people I've worked with there, the state of affairs is beyond horrendous for almost the entire population. Almost nobody likes it, except for the top Talibs in power. >

They had all the means to resist the taliban, if they didn’t it’s because they didn’t want. >

The worlds top military tried to help for 20 years and couldn’t >

They won't - What you gonna do? >

A few things come to mind:
borderline ignore
conditional aid(bribe),
sanctions,
back opponents to regime(diplomatically, financially, militarily),
occupy (again...),
drone strikes,
sabotage,
assassinate someone important(I dunno if that would really halt them that much),
nuke(might be a bit of an overreaction)
Not a lot of those are appealing or effective, so the likely course of action is to just sort of let them be whilst nudging and teasing it where you can, and hope that the situation improves it self.
Diplomacy is a complex and nuanced art, of which I know very little, so I'm sure there are more nuanced ways for changing a country situation externally(if you want too). >

Doesn’t conditional aid fail because they agree to terms and then the warlords just take resources and ignore promises until it’s time to rinse and repeat? >

That's if you pay in one lump sum, the idea is that you give it over in installments depending if the requested conditions are met and maintained. I don't know the exact balance but sometimes aid is sort of meant as a bribe. You write it up to aid the people but in reality you fully expect the local leaders to embezzle it. Its just a hard pill to swallow for the people back home, however for international politics bribery is a legitimate and important diplomatic tool. >

Or what? >

Well some of the charities have withdrawn , as it has become untenable, so much needed aid is not available. >

"So? Good riddance."
Taliban, probably >

Yes that was their reaction, hence the concern. >

If you let only males be aid workers, they will start fucking the poor females for food and aid in return. That's what happened in mass in Syria and there was a huge scandal about it. >

Well, and, plus, according to Islamic laws in Afghanistan, women can only be examined by female doctors. This isn't even getting into the fact that most social workers just are women. >

LOL. I'm sure the Taliban will really take that advice to heart. >

They just needed someone to be real with them, for once. >

Why would they listen to the G7?  Are they asking for IMF loans or something? >

We need to let this nation sort itself out rather than continuing to prop up the Taliban by letting them outsource basic governing functions to NGOs. >

They are the Taliban not the Talipermit. >

They blow themselves up to kill civilians and post torture/execution videos on the internet. 
They are literally terrorists that wants everyone in the west dead.
I dont think they are going to care what people think of them. >

You're confusing them with ISIS - they're the ones who posted such videos on the internet and want to annihilate the west entirely. >

phew, im sure the talibal will now revert it all and will make afganisthan into a great working democracy with female rights