>

My drunk ass thought the same thing and left me very confused.
how do they determine if 33% or more of a websites content is porn? >

And what’s porn and what isn’t. Someone dressed in a hazmat suit bathing in ranch dressing isn’t porn…..to some people. >

ok but how do you quantify it? you explanation does not show how they get to a 33% figure >

And could you game the system to throw it off. PornHub could just upload petabytes of non graphic, AI generated content to throw that figure off. 33% porn, the rest AI generated videos. >

good luck enforcing this one >

Pornhub is already complying. >

People still use pornhub? >

What else would we use? >

Didn't mean it in a judgemental way. I stopped using them when they axed a ton of amateur content a couple years ago. I get why they did it, but didn't like how they did it. Also they directly leaked my info onto the dw and forced me to have to abandon an email address I had for years.
These days I'm content to use NSFW reddit subs. >

You didn't use a burner email on a porn site? Really? >

Purchases of VPN subscriptions will be going up. >

This law sponsored by Nord VPN >

Louisiana, for those wondering. >

It took me reading half of the comment thread to realize they didn't mean LA. Haha