>

I wouldn't trust kids to understand how much of any potentially dangerous food would be within acceptable tolerances to an animal.  You're asking way too much of people who don't know better.
You know how dogs want to eat people food even though it's bad for them?
Trix are for kids, not rabbits. Seems self-explanatory to me. >

The Trix is a cut above the normal rabbit. Anthropomorphic, different eyes probably different, he walks on two legs.
Plenty of people feed dogs people food without severe complications. >

>Plenty of people feed dogs people food without severe complications.
certain foods, sure. Grapes, chocolate, etc are toxic. 
We don't know the Trix rabbit. We have to assume the information given us is accurate, because it's the only information we have to make a judgement on. That information is that Trix is for kids, not rabbits. It can't get any more clear. 
We should really be discussing why the kids steal the leprechaun's lucky charms, that's pretty messed up. >

Dismiss the animal’s suffering and focus on the man with the pot of gold, typical human smh >

I value the life of any human over any animal, yes. >

Sugar is very bad for rabbits; too much can kill them.
They're doing him a favor. >

They can monitor the portions and give him small, recommended amounts. He's also a 5-6 foot rabbit so I feel like his metabolism is different from ordinary rabbits.