>

Eh.. nudity maybe.  But not that I’m opposed to the art, but most modern pornography isn’t really close to “reality”.  
Cylinder guy is more close to reality for most.  
A coordinated 5 way gang-bang with porn model is more .. theatrical.. than reality.
I’ve seen front pages with severed heads and nobody bats an eye >

My original Reddit account got banned because I followed something like people getting what they deserve or whatever, basically an example someone beats up a grandma and gets knocked out and I’d say ya good fuck that guy, deserved it. And I guess people reported my comments and it got banned. Pretty crazy you can post the video but commenting on it gets you banned….
Was called Justice served!!! Just remembered >

Yeah reddits weird, you can't say stuff that implies wishing harm or death on people, so I just say "I can't say what I'm thinking" >


you can't say stuff that implies wishing harm or death on people

Ummm..... Ya I don't agree with this.  Over the last couple years there seems to be no problem wishing harm or death on republican elected officials.  I got banned from a sub for reporting someone for wishing death on a senator. >

The only way that could POSSIBLY happen is if you said you were the one who made the report, since mods cannot see who reports what. >

Unless you also respond to the questionable comment with "I'm going to report this" >

So, exactly what I said then? >

Yes >

I never see this gore in my front page >

Shit neither do I, and I’ve been trying. >

It’s always the quiet people…. >

Neither should be on the front page, imo
Also I wish there was a separate tag for gore. NSFW could be anything from a risky text post or straight up mutilation >

There used to be NSFL, not safe for life, and that was helpful for gore tags. 
If I see a sexy image, the worst thing that could happen is somebody else seeing at an inopportune time and getting a little embarrassed. But the mutilation sticks with me. >

Used to? Why’d they get rid of it? No wonder I haven’t been seeing it >

Reddit got rid of it because it gave investors the impression that they 'endorsed' gore being on the site by having a separate tag for it. >

I’ve never had any sort of gore or mutilation or any of that stuff on the front page. Actually, I’ve never seen it at all. How does that even happen? What subreddits are you in???? >

Based on a few memes I've seen r/eyeblech is probably some heinous shit, but I didn't feel like following up to confirm my suspicions >

I just braced myself and took a little peek at that subreddit. I can officially say I have indeed witnessed gore and mutilation and all of that stuff on Reddit. Is the eyebleach one full of actually good/cute things? I’m scared to look. But if so, imma need to look at it for awhile lmao >

Yeah, r/eyebleach is super wholesome! I also recommend r/littlegrabbies and r/illegallysmolcats >

Thank you, you’re so kind and helpful! <3 >

You must not live in a society >

It’s ridiculous, honestly. >

Well… it only shows what you’re in. If you join mostly NSFW subreddits you’ll see a lot of nudes but if you join stuff like eyeblech then you’ll see mutilated bodies >

You realize the algorithm curated your front page for you... >


...pornography is a natural part of life...

Reddit moment. >

you live in a cave, underwater. >

Not everybody consumes porn. Prior to the proliferation of internet porn a significant majority of people had nothing more pornographic than the bra section of the Sears catalogue. 
It is NOT "a natural part of life". >


Prior to the proliferation of internet porn a significant majority of people had nothing more pornographic

Which they rabidly beat their meat to... not sure what you are trying to convey here?
One mans Sears catalogue is another mans pornhub >

It's not just reddit. It's the whole world. Violence is more tolerated than sex and nudity. Showing terrorists holding people hostage and Iron man firing rockets at terrorists is PG13. But, Janet Jackson shows a tit and they change the rules for the entire entertainment industry. >

I doubt most pornography is a natural part of life. >

Exactly.  Nudity is natural.  Porn is not. >

and they banned both, they would rather have mutilations on the front page than nipples >

You should be aware that it's advertisers who decide what's okay in this scenario.
And it's the audience that makes the advertisers not want to advertise nudity.
Which means it's the people who pay advertisements that are deciding this.
Reddit admins have fuck all to do with that. This is a puritan issue. >

I thought all NSFW content was removed from r/popular, not just nudity? >

I thought the nudity was removed because it was all people pimping their onlyfans??? >

Yeah, the gonewild subs are not like it use to be in like 2015,16,17. >

Pornography is the exact opposite of natural.
EDIT: The acts/ scenes done in pornography are the opposite of natural/ realistic. Had to specify since someone decided to bash my comment due to lack of understanding my point. >

Source? >

hello? nudity has existed in art since art has existed, read a book, for once. >

I was thinking to actually go outside and get some life experience....if you know what I mean. >

Popular opinion. What subreddits are you in where there's mutilation!? I'm very happy with my tailored interests pushed to me, thanks. >

yes if you tailor them to remove gore no shit, jesus >

They remove most of the gore years ago