>

The topic in this thread was how to send mail without getting spam filtered. Someone suggested it could be server misconfiguration, but that wouldn’t affect just Republicans. I wasn’t referencing the article
"Google: Filter protects users from scams"
Literally ALL the RNC and Trump spam I received were certainly scams. >

A British journalist friend of mine subscribed to Trump's mailing list out of curiosity in 2020 and received multiple (what can only be called) spam messages every day. Shit like HI IT'S ME, DON JR. MY DAD, PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP HAS NOTICED YOU HAVEN'T DONATED TO HIS CAMPAIGN YET AND HE'S VERY DISAPPOINTED IN YOU! HE NEEDS YOUR HELP TO STOP THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS FROM DOING X TO STEAL YOUR FREEDOM. DONATE IMMEDIATELY AND YOUR CONTRIBUTION WILL BE MATCHED 280X! And then if you did donate there'd be a hidden thing that made the donation recurring every month.
It absolutely was spam. And it was weird how it always called people out personally. >

Somehow I ended up on the mailing list despite never signing up or wanting to. I was annoyed at first, then it just became fascinating.
Its defenitly spam, the constant variations of "Daddys disapointed in you" always made me chuckle though. >

when you sign up for "free" services, if you use gmail, most of the time you can add a suffix so you know if you sign up with anexampleemail+service@gmail, it should still resolve, and you can track who is selling your info to other spammy lists
although gmail reads the contents of your mail messages and builds ad profiles based off that >

The problem is that the + trick is pretty well known by now. Any competent spammer can simply strip the part after the plus sign to get the real email address and spam you on that.
An alternative solution, which I use myself, is to get a domain name and use a catchall email address. So anything that ends with @mydomain.tld is received by me. For personal use, I can use myname@mydomain.tld, but when signing up on a website I just use name-of-website@mydomain.tld. This makes it just as easy to identify sources of spam (note: it's often hacked / leaked databases), but it's impossible for the spammer to determine your true email address. You can also still have it all forwarded to GMail or some other email service, so you can keep using that.
The only downside is that a domain name costs a bit of money. But it's not much. >

I just use additional free email accounts that I keep as spam sponges to sign up for anything. My personal email and my business email are also kept separate/isolated from each other. >

This says more about the nature of the emails the RNC sends out. 
The party that lambastes "the radical left" for being woke snowflakes certainly likes to play the victim while incessantly lamenting their persecution at the hands of the woke mob or the latest left-wing boogeyman. >

The GOP like to play the victim? I had no idea! I guess I was distracted by the war on Christmas, the stolen 2020 election, my whiteness being devalued, my religion under attack, my masculinity under attack, my stove being taken away, my hamberders being taken away, and my wife trying to claim that she is deserving of some kind of respect. I mean, how could you make such a bold and outrageous claim? It's personally offensive to me and I'm going to sue you just watch out! >

Don’t forget that you had low-flow toilets forced upon you!  They do not properly clear your giant freedom-turds! >

Who's the manager of this toilet?!?!? >

Spammer loses complaint that Gmail spam filter is biased against spam. >

If the emails from your organization keeps getting filtered as spam, it would help to stop and think what the organization should be actually doing. >

Seriously. Try being good at your jobs, people! >

Would help if their emails didn't look like something from TimeCube. >

There are 4 simultaneous 24 hour days within a single rotation of the Earth. You may be too damn evil to accept it. >

Wow. That's a blast from the past. >

Stop sending spam and filtering dissipates! >

Spam filters hate this 1 simple trick >

It's biased against scams, spams, and racist rants.
It just so happens that aligns exactly with Republican campaign messages. >


But Google said its spam filter is designed to protect users from "malware, phishing attacks, and scams."

Well then, it's no wonder Google's spam filter blocked GOP emails. >

A spam filter that doesn’t weed out conservative BS isn’t worth a whole lot. It’s not a bug, it’s a feature. >

If you use LaSt ChAnCe To SeNd YoUr MoNeY To DoNaLd TrUmP on the subject line it is very likely that you will be caught in the spam filter. >

If I recall correctly, they want no filters on their content at all. So I personally set a filter to send anything GOP-related, they object.
I'm so glad they lost on the complaint. >


If I recall correctly, they want no filters on their content at all.

Unless it's a library, then they are all about filters. >

One approach would have been to learn how to send automated emails without getting spam filtered. No surprise Republicans would go with whining about imagined bias instead. >

This most assuredly isn’t the problem. Email black lists decide who gets sent to the spam folder, so it’s just people reporting republican newsletters as spam. >

Most often when emails get filtered en masse, it’s for a technical reason. Server mismatch, etc. >

Yeah i handled email blacklistings alot. But that’s generally if the email list was never setup correctly. So if that’s the problem it probably wouldn’t skew Republican >

You're letting everyone know you didn't read the article. Lol