>

It seems to me like there's a bit of circular reasoning at the heart of your view, unless your post is missing context. You think that out-of-city drivers are bad drivers, because they're always the ones making poor driving decisions. And you identify out-of-city drivers by looking at which drivers are making poor driving decisions. Perhaps the people in your city just aren't as good at driving as you all think you are.
Different places have different driving cultures and require you to cultivate different driving skills. I'm sure there are many places where your experience would tell you that everyone else was behaving dangerously, yet the general concensus would be that you were the problem. Would you be objectively a worse driver than all those people, or just worse at driving in an unfamiliar place?
/u/thicc_noods117 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.
All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >

I get that you're just venting about drivers, but this just an impractical, pointless, and vindictive solution. 
What those restrictions be? Banning drivers who don’t live in a city from entering? Congratulations, there goes your city’s booming restaurant, arts, and tourism industry.
Conversely, city drivers can often be overly-aggressive and ignore traffic rules. So should city drivers be banned in the suburbs and country?
Mountain roads are also notoriously sharp and difficult, causing many uninitiated drivers to drive extremely slow. Should they be banned from mountain roads?
It seems like you’re just trying to express your personal beefs with certain drivers without any thought to practicality. >

I know op deltaed for this, but I would actually say that the answer should be "yes" to some of these. 
Obviously not without some other changes though and not in every "city." City streets can be a uniquely difficult challenge for people not used to all the additional hazards and rules. There are a lot more pedestrians, more buses, trams, emergency vehicles, cyclists, and restricted lanes. You have both lots of vehicles and frequent lane changes. You have to negotiate things that you might not be used to like parallel parking and roundabouts. Other drivers are often less patient and more aggressive. 
The answer isn't simply to ban people without a "municipal" qualification from driving in the city, but to also make it less necessary. Build and fund better public transit in the city and make it easier for drivers to park and ride.
On mountain roads, you don't really have a whole lot of traffic that isn't used to mountain roads. Sure you might get a tourist every once in a while that slows everyone down, but it's pretty uncommon and unlike in cities, they're overly cautious. >


•go 10-15 miles below the speed limit •drift in and out of lanes •don't use turning signals •cut people off in very dangerous ways

I live in Los Angeles and see this every single day. This has nothing to do with where someone got their license. >

Yea — op needs to consider confirmation bias. You see a bad driver and overwhelmingly you know nothing about their driving history.