>

Don't forget to note the fact that the house in question of presently controlled by anyone other than the Republicans, otherwise he wouldn't be punished at all.
I'm pretty sure people like George Santos are getting into republican politics not because they believe in whatever that platform represents today but because there is such a low bar you can be a known criminal and be welcome with open arms. >

Maybe 5 years ago a someone could've told me how the party represents a vastly different way of life with a valid perspective. Today anyone who tells you conservatives have values is ether a fool or a fooler. >

Sorry, but nothing has changed since then, and 5 years ago you would have been the fool. Even if you corrected to a date before Trump. 
It's just only now do some more people are paying attention. I just wish enough people would realise Establishment Dems are not your friends either. No values but what maximizes their donors' profits with zero thought about what Americans need, let alone what they want. >

Between Thieves and Murderous Thieves, I know who my first enemy is. >

But no one ever acknowledges that the Lesser Evil is still also Evil. Very evil. Just not as evil as the most. And they are ruining our country in different ways that prevent our countrymen from being able to take care of each other and their selves. No wonder they wanted to throw the firebomb that is Trump into the Presidency. 
Liberals just put their fingers in their ears and go "La La La I can't hear you, Democrats are perfect, if you disagree you're a dumb Conservative la la la." Even when you're definitely not Conservative, they just can't help but think Democrats are perfect because they aren't Conservative. >

You fail to understand that women, gays, and other minorities are in a fight for their human rights and lives.
There is a 2 party system in this thing the rest of us call objective reality, and there is currently only a least worst option. 
Fuck the fucking democratic party; but my other option is being fucked and killed. >

Yea man dems are doing such a good job protecting rights, I'm not sure you've heard of a little something called Roe v. Wade it was kind of a big deal, which was repealed while democrats had complete control. Gay rights and interracial marriage are gonna be on the chopping block as well.
Just wait until the fascist supreme court rules on independent state legislature theory and they take away your vote and the dems stand with their arms crossed doing nothing while crying about republicans destroying the country.
Democrats apathy is just as bad as republicans psychotic illegal acts, why? Because they let them get away with it regardless of who's in power. >

Which party is doing the Women are Property push again? Can't remember. >

And who is trying to stop them? Not the democrats that's for sure. >

Did you miss everything I said in the first comment you replied to, or are you just fulfilling some quota? >

Who else didn’t even need to look at the story to know what party he represents? >

It is kind of a fun game now. “Let’s see what party…..of course!” >

More like "99% sure not a Democrat, but I might as well double check for that other 1% confirmation." >

Yep 99% of the time it's a Republican.
But the other 1% of the time it's Anthony wiener. >

When democrats are found to be sexual deviants they are ousted from the party
Republicans elect theirs president. >

In this instance, elected to State Rep despite this being known before the election.
Republican voters love these sexual predators! >

Some people vote for the guy they would have a beer with. >

It's so weird. It's very very rarely I see any celebrity, or really anyone for that matter I'd want to have a drink or smoke with.
Like, maybe Eric Andre or Adam Sandler.
But could you imagine smoking a bowl with Trump or the rapping republican granny?
I'd rather rip my own dick off. >

Get that ol' dick twist, just twist it right off. 
Can you imagine smoking a bowl with like Kaitlyn Bennet? She just polishes her one rifle while talking about her awkward obsession with Trans people before shitting her pants? 
I'd absolutely take the dick twist too. >

I recognized the reference, at least lol.
Now I'm looking for that video again. >

I imagine Stout is bleating about "cancel culture". >

And “wokism”.
“This is an attack on my Christian values! The Bible says women are to be submissive. Taking a woman’s claim of sexual assault seriously infringes on my belief! It is feminism run amok!” >

Lol. Wokism 
I too despises Asian barbeque! >

This is good. >

“Speaker of the Oregon House of Representatives Dan Rayfield removed freshman Rep. Brian Stout (R-Columbia City) from his committee assignments because a five-year protection order against Stout remains in place.
A former campaign volunteer in November accused Stout of sexually abusing her and threatening her with violence.”
How did I know it was a Republican? >

I'm surprised he was removed from his committee assignments. McCarthy is rewarding Santos with one. >

The speaker is a Democrat. >

Derp. Thanks for pointing out what should've been obvious. >

Oh yeah, this is a goldmine...

He did admit that the woman had performed fellatio on him after a 2020 campaign event, but he said the encounter was consensual and that she had initiated it. Stout confirmed that his wife walked in on the pair as the act concluded.  
“There was a huge lapse of judgment by me,” Stout said. “I let her pull my pants down and perform oral sex. It was short, it was brief, and it was a mistake. She wanted it to go further. It did not.” >

You don't get a sexual assault conviction and 5 year restraining order for consensual blowjob.
*edit: should have read the article. Court matters are still in process, apparently. That's a long protection order without a conviction. My point still stands about the consent part, though. >

I mean, I could come up with a number of scenarios where a woman would consent to sexual acts and then later lie about the consensual part for some kind of gain.
Not saying that's the case here, or that it's common or whatever, but it's definitely not impossible nor does it by itself indicate guilt. >

You could.  You'd be arguing in such bad faith the Inquisition would pop up out of the ground to investigate, but you certainly could. >

"It was short, it was brief..." If the encounter ended quickly, what was he describing first? >

Joking aside, that's such a BS defense. He's trying to downplay saying it was brief as if he put a stop to it? When obviously it stopped because of what he said here
"Stout confirmed that his wife walked in on the pair as the act concluded." >

Is there a/an eligibility list to follow for running for office?  So many of these people are criminals and need to be locked up.  Sickening really. >

There is not if you are a republican. It seems the more stupid/evil/despicable the candidate, the more the rank & file republicans love him. >

The party of family values strikes again >

attempts to not assume what party this rep belongs to
belongs to party I assumed they belong to >

GOP’s reign of childishness is off to a banger of a start. >

Is being a sex offender part of the job for Republicans now? That’s like 6 just in the past couple months. And of course everyone know about the pedophile Matt Gaetz. What a weird party. >

Republicans love sex offenders,  it gets Da Libs upset.   More Republican sex offenders!!!!  That’ll show em! >

How did I know this fuck was a repub before even looking. >

What's with Republicans and all the sexual abuse? >

They are creating their very own Vatican Follies (follys)? >

Republican?
*checks *
Republican