>

I don't know why anyone would be a criminal in this day and age. 
Between security cameras, DNA, and social media -they are going to get caught.
Luckily he was dumb enough to do it with a gigantic tattoo. >

Surely the camera got his license plate too
What a moron >

Good thing there's a linked article telling you what the camera captured... >

I can't read articles like this right now.
Anxiety
I just took a bunch of shit. Maybe I'll read it tomorrow >

Hope you feel better soon. Cyber hug >

Thanks. I'm actually typing this from the dermatologist >

Well, best wishes…I need to make an appointment with my dermatologist too. >

Very decent of you, and best of luck.
Nothing more to be done but wait for the biopsy. Guess I'll go home and do some yardwork.
Take care of yourself, fellow human >

Thanks. You as well. 
That’s what I need to get also. A biopsy. Got a thang that just popped up on my thigh that has me worried. Good idea to try and distract yourself. >


distract yourself

Heh. Yeah, good luck with that, right?
Well regardless, good luck anyway. >

Thank God
ETA:  Oh ffs, I am not even remotely religious.  It’s just a figure of speech.  Calm down. >

Well, god made the guy in the truck too. So also, what the fuck God?
Edit: This is the most insanely up/down comment I've ever posted--it went from +25 to -32 in like an hour. Did this get brigaded by religious folks or something? >

An omnipotent God, like the Judeo-Christian God, could create a species that had free will yet also always chose the perfect thing to do. Because he is omnipotent. 
Free will isn't the catch-all got-em you think it is. It's actually an incredibly weak theological argument against "The Problem of Natural Evil." >

That’s… the opposite of free will…. >

No, it isn't. An omnipotent God can create a free will within a species that still always chooses good. >

If God ensures we always choose good, we don’t have free will by definition. >

Free will doesn't mean that we can do literally anything. I can't try to kidnap people from drive-thru windows, because that's not who I am. I literally couldn't force myself to even want to do that. Does this mean that I lack free will? God could have made this guy like me, but he didn't. Why? Free will doesn't cut it. >

Good for the Barista for being quick. I guess drive through kidnapping is now a thing. >

Well it's so convenient >

Personally I just Amazon my kidnap victims, with prime there’s still a decent chance they are alive to with two day delivery >

But they always come damaged. >

That's a given with any Amazon employee though... >

Former Amazonian here, can confirm. We all have daddy Bezos issues. >

Crazy. Would love to see scalding hot coffee thrown in his face. >

Life in prison.  No parole.  Solitary confinement. >

Sadly, attempted kidnapping probably won’t get him very much jail time and he will be out in a few years to do it again.  This type of crime is not taken seriously enough.  How many rapists get out of jail and do it again? So, so many -it’s sickening! >

Honestly punishment for this should be just as serious as regular kidnapping. This isn't the type of thing someone just tries once. >

I am pretty much for the extreme reduction to elimination of "victimless crimes".... and an increased level of sentencing for victim-ed crimes where there is absolutely no doubt who did it and there is no reasonable excuse (ie: stealing to eat and survive)
They can KNOW they got the right person.  There is no excuse for his behavior, and there will never be a reason to trust he wont do it again.  Man should die in prison. >

So he was going to pull a 100+ lb woman through a window (with one arm), drag her behind his truck until he can get her into the vehicle, all while displaying visible tattoos caught on surveillance camera. Real genius thinking here >

It was a bikini-based coffee shop (just found out those exist) and some people theorized that this might be more in line with massage parlor shootings or other examples of anti female hate-crimes, which usually target sex workers or women of her description ("stacies").
If that's the case, giving her horrible road rash as punishment for wearing a bikini seems right in line with that style of thought. 
It also means you're a lot less concerned with self-preservation. >

Didn’t realize it was that type of coffee shop from the article. That does change the dynamic a bit. Still evil of course but maybe motivated like you say. Also what’s a Stacy? >

It's an incel term, the female version of a "Chad" except worse. The highschool girls, sorority sisters, Instagram models, etc. young, attractive, sexually active (or aleast could be, just not with you) these types of girls and sex workers are often the ones cited in their manifestos. 
It's a way of dehumanizing them (us), same way they refer to us as "females" like we're animals or roasties (a term based on the false belief that when a woman has "too much" sex her labia minora become long and saggy and leak out the vulva like roast beef off a sandwich) . >

My god. I’m glad I’ve never encountered people that use those terms. >

You can find A LOT of people around here in every sub who at least talk about women as "females" >

This is some Israel Keys stuff >

That’s EXACTLY where my mind went. >

This is the worst plan ever.
Does he even understand physics in the slightest?
How many times did he run this over in his head where she just magically leaped through his window into his arms.