>

How long before he starts selling NFT's of his different identities to the MAGA crowd?
The hard right is where all the best grifting opportunities lie, he's like a moth to a flame. >

Also, they’re the ones who tolerate the most lies, as long as you have (R) after your name. >

Also, they are the ones most likely to defend the ends justifies the means.
The ones most likely to defend Trump's election lies.
The ones most likely to defend the violence on January 6th.
The ones most likely to say the poor deserve their lot in life because they are lazy and/or stupid. >

You know ... the morons. >

Came for the trashing of George Santos, stayed for the Blazing Saddles reference. >

“Santos is only pawn…in game of life” >

"Candygram for Santos. Candygram for Santos." >

I mean there was the pathological lying >

Don’t forget he also flashed the white power sign while being sworn in >

Not while being sworn in, but during a vote for speaker.  Not that that's any less repugnant. >

No shit.
Did anyone think he was a moderate? >

Moderates themselves are pretty right-leaning so even if he was(which he isn't) he would still be biased toward the right. >

No. There are a lot more moderate Democrats than moderate Republicans. >

Moderate democrats are still securely in the right wing, Jefferies hates the left, pelosi never tried to increase the self awareness or power of labor nor did she push hard for government alleviation of the consequences of capitalism on the population. >

I think you need to do a little more actual studying of politics instead of perusing edgy hyperbole on social media. Moderate Democrats are not right wing in any way, shape or form. Their politics are consistent with the mainstream politics of the rest of the developed world. >

He lies easier than he breathes so I’m not sure why this was ever in question. >

Like literally flashing white power handsigns, yes. >


Early signs? tilting? >

Even that headline. “Appears”? It’s a photo. We see exactly what he’s doing. 
Mainstream journalism in the United States refuses to offend those in power by clearly pointing out the obvious. We saw this when they wouldn’t point out trumps lies for years. It’s fucking infuriating. >

I wouldn’t call NewYork Post mainstream journalism >

Early signs? >


Early signs? tilting? >

That’s the only strategy for him to survive and stay out of prison - lean hard right… >

Seems to be working quite well, though. The first 2 pages of /new on this sub has 13 posts with his name in the headline right now. 
This jackass is following the exact same playbook as Trump and MTG. Feeding the media its outrage porn. >

It's the epitome of baptism by fire. I strongly suspect we've already reached a tipping point where there's so many different scandals with him that if he politically (and criminally) survives the next couple months it will be near impossible for any further scandals to taint him.
Of course his district doesn't leans 5-10 pts blue so they will toss him to the curb in 2024. He's going to milk the next two years for everything he can before he needs to find another avenue for grifting. >


He's going to milk the next two years for everything he can before he needs to find another avenue for grifting.

If he survives the next few months, I don't think he'll need to find another avenue for grifting. It'll find him. >

Considering he's almost certainly a Russian agent, this is no surprise. >

He should feel right at home. >

Moderate republicans are not part of the gop anymore. This is hardly surprising. >

But they still vote R. >

Right. They certainly are a part of that party. Don’t fool yourself, you know? >

I mean yeah. He's aligning himself with the people most likely to tolerate his chronic pathological lying. >

I’m still not convinced that’s even his name. >

I love how the far right is funded by mainstream Republican money and people buy the “moving to the far right.”  the Republican Party funds the far right, full stop.  Therefore santos didn’t have to move >

Right? All GOP members are hard right. We already have a "moderate right" party. They're called the Democrats. >

Where else would he tilt?  Guy is a total fraud. He’s made for them >

Makes sense. If you’re gonna be a criminal align yourself with the people who protect criminals. The gop is a mob racket. >

Remember kids we wouldn't be here (and wouldn't have the fake democrat Eric Adams) if the NYtimes did its job and actually reported on this earlier instead of puffing up a fake crime wave. >

If you want to blame someone, it isn't the media. Did his Democratic opponent's campaign not do even the most basic opposition research? Even a bit of it? If so, they seem to have chosen to tell nobody about it. That's political malpractice at very best >

Long Island Dems are absolutely responsible for this. They didn't do any oppo research and this was the SECOND TIME Santos ran against a Dem on Long Island. 
Tom Souzzi's campaign fucked up bad but won and then Robert Zimmerman totally flunked his job as a Dem candidate by missing this shit. It's insane. 
With all the fucking money in politics, hire a Private Detective to sniff this shit out. It's probably less than one of the billion media buys they spend their campaign cash on. >

Apparently they did uncover some of it, and sent it to a tiny local paper, but that's all they did with it. Instead of shouting from the rooftops that this asshole was a fraud. >

With all the money spent on ads and attack ads and PACs doing fuck-knows-what with campaign money, it's wild that these allegations weren't just on every TV on the Island. Insane. >

The Evolution of the Republican Party.
"I can stand in the middle of 5th Avenue, shoot somebody and I would not lose any voters, okay?"
Donald Trump 2016
"I can con a veteran out of $3,000, kill his dog, and not lose any voters, okay?"
George Santos 2022 >

Needs to be fired ....investigate his lies >

Liar finds willing suckers, a match made in hell >

They will protect him >

Oh, wow, I totally did not see that coming at all. Who would have thought that a lying grifter would gravitate towards the largest group of suckers and marks in the country? >

No you fuckin think so?  My stars what a surprise >

And when the fascists rule the streets, he'll be among the first against the wall >

He's not "drifting", he has always been there. Another lie on the pile. >

Santos is further proof that the only thing good out of Long Island are the bagels. >

Shocking. >

What an insult, the dude literally invented conservatism, just like he started the liberal movement also. >

No shit >

Conservatives have no ethics or morals. It checks out. >

He meets all of the requirements: he is a pathological liar. >

Con man tilts toward largest number of gullible marks. >

Well, he can't exactly tilt towards anything with integrity, can he? >

No fuckin shit? >

Psychopath with zero morals and “hard right” go together like peanut butter and jelly >

He's got the lying down to a tee. >

“Early signs” lol
Anyone who things he’s exhibiting these signs “early” hasn’t been paying attention ffs >

You don't say. >

Wait, you mean he didn’t tell the truth in his campaign?  I don’t believe you. >

No shit. They are the only ones that will have anything to do with him >

“Shows signs of being available to the highest bidder.” Fix your headline >

Was it the white power secret hand signal? >

Why can't we fast-forward to the part where he was being propped up by entities that were effective Russian agents but, like the rest of the MAGA core, he wasn't aware enough or skeptical enough to look into why people came out of the woodwork to support him, instead attributing it to some combination of self worth and providence? >

He always was there.  The guy is a plant. >

And water is wet >

The far right support anyone that supports them. Thats their only requirement. So for scumbags and losers and other people who should be banished from society they all become far right. >

This should not be a surprise. >

can't spell conservative without con >

Gee, what a shock. >

This is new info? It seemed pretty apparent from the beginning >

Shocked! Shocked, I say! >

That is where the marks are. >

Not surprising when he threw up a white supremacy symbol on his first day. >

Implying he wasn't already..? >

The times with another hot take. What tipped them off? Was it the fucking white power hand signs he was flashing at his swearing in???!!! Really speaking truth to power over there at the times, as per usual. >

Fuck the NYT. They’re a dick sucking establishment mouthpiece. >

This scumbag will tilt whichever way the wind blows! >

Of course, Santos would tilt to the hard right. As long as you support their causes it does not matter how despicable you are. For a group that tries to claim the moral high ground, the right is mostly the ends justify the means type of group for their elected officials and pundits. >

Santos is there specifically to draw fire away from McCarthy and other powerful Republicans who want to not be in the news cycle constantly while they attempt to push their agenda. It's the only explanation for why he hasn't been forced to resign. He's a great distraction from the actual destruction the GOP intends to achieve >

This is not surprising.  His entire facade is built around appearing to have a background that would give you the impression that he was at least moderate.  From pretending to be Jewish, to claiming to be openly gay.  My guess is there is nothing about this man that is genuine and it was all a front to get elected so that he could make a hard right turn when in office.  This is why despite of his clear lies and questionable character, McCarthy chose to seat him on committees.  He shouldn't even be in Congress. >

Color me surprised >

Immoral person settles into an immoral political belief system. Next on channel 10, we cover the sun rising this morning. >

duh >

yeahn no shit detective >

This is my shocked face >

Weird. I wonder if it was him flashing the white power hand symbol. >

lmao what is this a medical condition? >

As expected. >

I'm shocked! Shocked!
Well, not that shocked. >

He does realize he’s in a D+10 district, right?  This isn’t like Boebert, who barely survived in a R+7 district. >

is anyone shocked.. he has no choice to go with the pro-liar insanity crew.. their followers/voters would believe anything >

I'm shocked and appalled.  
/s just in case >

Did stealing $3k from a dying dog give it away? >

And watch the GOP fully embrace him >

I mean, yeah, that's where the money is. Why wouldn't someone with no morals or ethics do that? >

How is this news? Dude flashed a fucking white power symbol on one of his first votes and has lied about literally everything he’s spoken on. >

Just as his handlers meant him to. >

Tilting? That’s laughable. He made a deal with the hardliners to get his money and his position and he will do whatever they tell him to from here on out. >

Well if course he is, that's where the grifting money is the best. >

The criminal known as George Santos is obviously a Russian intelligence asset.
Russian intelligence has captured the GOP leadership and is running their anti-American behavior and propaganda. This began with the FSB incursion on RNC servers in 2015, in preparation for their asset, Donald Trump. Still going on as the GOP tries to side with Russia in their invasion of Ukraine, and kill off funding for Ukrainian defense.
If we don't do something about this criminal immediately, we can expect a lot more compromised candidates moving forward. >

George, you’re brown, Jew “ish”, and gay. 
The right wing HATES all of those things. And no, they don’t treat you like “one of the good ones.” >

He’s literally a Russian spy. we are so fucked >

Birds of a feather >

Was it the lies, I bet it was the lies. >

What signs? He was at the January 6th rally complaining about how his election was stolen too in his first failed attempt to be a congressman. That seems pretty damn conclusive. >

Was it all the lying that tipped you off? >

The white power hand signal wasn't a give away? 🤔 >

He's gonna tilt whichever way the money flows. >

Early signs of tilting? He practically skipped over to it on the first day while humming. >

Heck, that is what he was paid to do.  Go to the disrupters and disrupt government. The guy is a narcissistic, lying shill for a certain foreign government that paid him the big bucks to run and he is earning his money. >

did the gang signs not do it for you? >

Who would have guessed that someone who lied about everything, even his name, would end up being a hard right republican >


George Santos Shows Early Signs of Tilting to the Hard Right

Bought and payed for by Putin's cronies, fascistic tendencies are be be expected. >

No tilting is required.  He started out on the far right. >

He's gonna kiss up to McCarthy and the qanon 5 to keep protection from impeachment. >

I’m still thinking this guy is a white supremacist domestic terrorist infiltrator/plant. It fits the model. >

Take George Santos, or whatever his name is, mix in the Long Island Republican whackos who voted for him, sprinkle some powdered Russian oligarch donations on top, pay some "vendors" from the campaign coffers, and we have ...
Just another Wednesday in Republican world. >

Santos shows early signs of psychosis >

The GOP is a straight up joke, but no one is laughing. >

Tilting to the hard right? I thought he only tilted at windmills. >

He's an external plant and I guarantee he's going to end up as speaker. >

Shocking >

Hmm, I thought that's all the GOP is now... 
The media has to stop saying there is a "hard right" and a more normal GOP. Beyond that, Santos is hard right out of the gate, given his sociopathic lying and cheating. >

What a drag. >

We shouldn’t write headlines that pretend like Santos is a legitimate congressman. >

It’s where the ethical violations are a feature, not a bug >

Was...was the "White Power" sign while getting sworn in not a clear enough indication of which way George Santos is leaning?!? >

Gasp! George Santos? The guy who freed the slaves? >

He was literally throwing up white supremacist hand signals before Congress was even sworn in and you say he’s “showing early signs”??? >

He definitely signaled he was “ok” with it…. >

That's already a given, considering the R next to his name. Every single Republican in Congress is a far right extremist, and if you believe that any of them are "moderates" then I have a bridge to sell you. >

This headline looks so moronic I almost thought it was written by Haberman. >

Well any time “hard right” enters the chat it associates with the word moron.
To the point where the two are synonymous! >

I'm shocked. And stunned. Very stunned >

I bet you aren’t really. Not at all. >

I'm being very truthful! I'm being as honest as George Santos!!!! >

Point goes to Lostin1spot. >

It’s where the ethical violations are a feature, not a bug >

He goes with the flow and the right excepts his many discrepancies. He's a wiener. >

It’s where the ethical violations are a feature, not a bug >

It would be best if journalist would not give him the time of day and treated him like he is invisible. It would go well with his illusive personality. >

The hard right is where he'll be accepted.  I mean just look at all the crazies that have found a home on the far right. >

Running for the Republican Party in 2022? >

John Stewart nailed it on his podcast.  George is fresh fish in the prison yard. Only the far right is willing to protect him. >

If you get into, you run to your base, it's politics 101. >

George Santos is a Russian asset and a danger to the United States and it's constitution. That being said, the alt-right will chew him up and shit him out. Dude was picked last and is going to whoever can stomach him. The group that has no loyalty, no fealty and loves feeding its own to the wolves will do so the second it helps them. He seems dead-set on playing congressman - long term I have a feeling he will regret that decision. >

Because that’s the direction that lying pulls towards. >

He is a chameleon. He’s going to change often - whenever there money, power, status and his ass not getting into trouble. 
It’s disgusting how the Republicans dont care and actually trying use his situation. He is a great distractor. 
Someone dig all the way into the his past to the point of his birth certificate. >

Tilts towards the till. Every time. >

As evidenced by the photo, the jackass doesn't know how to conceal carry very well. >

He will be welcomed with open arms. >

Jeez - he’s tilted all the way to psychosis. >

why is he tilting and not flat out fired? i’d get fired on the spot if i lied 🤥 n my resume and i’m not a member of congress >

He’s a lazy opportunist just like MTG, Bimbert, Cruz, trump and many other GQP politicians. He’s there to grift and sow chaos, not having the slightest notion of serving the people. >

No shit >

No shit.  The further right you go the more full of shit you are.  This guy is basically going to be the far right’s unicorn of a mascot. >

To the surprise of absolutely no-one. Grifters gonna grift. >

He goes where his Russian handlers tell him to >

Woah shocker >

To the surprise of no one >

Yea we all watched Marge groom him >

Scared and running to his safe place. >

And we should totally believe anything we see from this guy. >

Who the fuck is writing these articles? Early signs??? >

New York, please do better next time. >

You mean a guy paid by a Ruzzian oligarch is somehow a fascist? Who coulda seen that coming?! >

No shit. His nuts are in a vice. He is beholden to far right whims, and being the absolute criminal and grifter he is, he is happy to comply. >

Dude is just looking for an audience or an umbrella to hide under. 
He's a total con, a grifter, so of course right wing loons is a perfect target >

No.. not ol george. American astronauts should not be spoken about like this, that man is a hero that saved us from alien annihilation. >

No shit >

I wish he hadn’t gone down this path and stayed in his lane as a world championship tennis player. >

Boebert needs someone she can push around while giving puppy eyes to Matt Gaetz. >

Early signs? We saw Greene recruiting him on live TV. >

Is that a colostomy bag? >

Fascism in America is getting steam. The complete and total abandonment of truth has begun. >

If you are funded by Russians the you vote with the Russian stooges >

The Fascist Right is the only temporarily safe place for that sort of low life. >

Well, no shit- that's the only group which will support him through all his bullshit because, "own the libs." >

It’ll be funny when businesses who require vaccination stop doing business in Florida and the economy suffers, but hey at least he owned the libs. >

You don’t say. 
I am shocked. Shocked, I tell you. >

He literally flashed the white power sign while being sworn in. It’s no surprise he’s hard right >

As long as he doesnt open his mouth about the orgies and cocaine he will do well in today's GOP. >

It’s his only choice - and biggest opportunity. Trump will pick him as VP running mate. >

Hat what he was out there to do. Dark money candidates are criminals >

Moderates don't get play from Fox News.... >

At some point, with all the lies, we’re going to refer to him as “George Santos…if that’s his real name” >

He stole money from a dog. >

Fraud who's only hope for support is people who do not care about fraud. Sounds about the type. >

What a surprise. He is tilting exactly how person who bought him is telling him to tilt. >

Early signs? Tilting? Dude was fully packed and ready to run in to it before his feet even hit american soil. >

Dude sure seems to be a Russian asset... makes sense. 
McCarthy likes it. >

It would have been wildly hilarious is Santos was secretly a massive progressive. the Republicans would be stunned and doing everything in their power to get him removed >

Stop covering this douche bag >

They need a new Roger Stone >

He’s a scam artist.  Republican voters are a grifters dream.  It’s that simple. >

He blows with the wind. He's for sale to the highest bidder. Right now it pays for him to be hard right. Just a shameless grifter among shameless grifters. >

Of course he does. He’s a con man. They love con men over there. >

Now you know why Republicans won't kick him out of Congress. >

Early signs? The dude has been seen flashing white power hand signals… >

You mean the huWhite Powrrr sign wasn’t clear enough? >

Every conman knows where an easy mark can be found. >

Russian assets tend to do that. >

he's like a moth to a flame. >

The Hard Right is the only Right they GQP has anymore, they’ve been headed towards this road for a looong time. >

That would just make him a more useful idiot. The hard right isn’t what you would call LBGTQ friendly. “Vote and get away from us” is likely how he will be treated. >

I thought he was hard right already >

What an amazing surprise. >

Well naturally. Who do you think bought the clothes that he didn't steal from his roommate? >

That's where incompetent, dishonest, and genuinely worthless pieces of shit find their people. >

Your own brand new Hitler. >

I don’t consider throwing up white power signals to be titling to the right. >

Santos is like Trump without an inheritance - full of …. >

He literally flashed white power hand signals on the House floor. Kinda given >

Yeah like showing the white supremecy sign during his photo op. >

He already shows signs of being hard right, he is a LIAR! >

The alt right has successfully carved out a series of vital privileges for itself that the rest of the population does not have. It is the only direction Santos can go and still stay relevant and insulate himself from consequences. 
Trump did the same thing during his term; he was always alt right but he arguably went even further right during his presidency as his controversies deepened. I can't believe that we are having a media repeat of 2017 with the "consequences for so-and-so are coming" headlines and everyone is eating it up like justice is coming on its shining white horse. Not likely. There are no adults to stop the toddlers from wrecking the room; only bystanders.
The only consequences for politicians like Trump and Santos are that they are despised by a majority and that they will serve only one term. Perhaps this is the most essential consequence, but hardly meets the level of satisfaction most of us want to see. >

"alt" right is just a family friendly name they give themselves to avoid being accurately called facist >

This is the New York Times journalism. He made white supremacist hand gestures at his his swearing in, but the NYT thinks maybe possibly there’s a chance he might be leaning towards the far right. >

That's where the desperate go >

Because he knows it will make him rich. >

BREAKING NEWS: Water is wet! >

Wow what a shock >

George Santos would not be a good con man if he failed to seek the same refuge that has protected Donald Trump >

Honestly, this was a foregone conclusion, because at this point no one else will have him.  The far right is characterized by clinging to their own power above basic decency, which is why they are led by figures like Greene, Boebert, and Gaetz who wouldn't be given the time of day my most decent American citizens.  Santos will fit right in. >

Has it been established that his name is George Santos? >

? I thought we knew. >

Was there every any doubt? >

I find it odd that no one in the big media defines anarchy as the final stop of the hard-right. Isn’t that the proper extreme of « least governance is the best governance »? >

Huh, I wonder why he would gravitate toward a movement that holds the press to be malicious, illegitimate habitual liars.
Almost like he has no principles beyond his own aggrandizement. He’ll fit reich in! >

He does need to find constituents that are open to liars and grifters - moderates need not apply.   He’s gotta find the white ex-con voters. >

Of course he is. The hard right protect their own, no matter how vile. >

Get this sloppy fuck out of office >

Duh! >

No shit. He’s a fucking asset. >

He's not tilting, he was already there.  He just..... wait for it.
He lied about it. >

Who is behind this fucker? Someone powerful clearly bankrolled him. Now he's tilting to the right? >

He’s been there all along with the rest of the pathological liars. He found his peeps and a job that will pay him for lying—the Republican Party! >

Uh, what gave it away?  Him being an unabashed lying, grifting, scumbag? >

Of course he does. The hard right are the ones that won’t kick him out. He’s kissing up to the extreme in order to be protected from expulsion. >

Glass half full: now there’s more diversity and inclusion in every facet of the American legislature…. >

I couldn’t get past the paywall, but based on the title, I assume that means he is screaming about rigged elections, fake news, the need to burn books and shoot up the homes and offices of Democrat rivals. 
/s >

Why wouldn’t he? They harbor lots of criminals in the name of “justice”. >

This is the GOP strategy: make shit up about being a good moderate person to get elected, then switch to your real far-right positions. >

He was proud to say he attended J6 during the campaign >

Was it the white power hand gesture that gave it away? >

He has no political beliefs that can’t be bought by the highest bidder. >

shocked Pikachu face >

He "owes" them now...this is unsurprising. >

Really? (Sarcasm) >

GOP keeps making him sit at the losers table and thinks that will stop him from creaming his pants from all the attention? >

What was your first clue? >

What’s under his shirt in that photo? Almost looks like he has a pistol in his waistband >

I thought he was already hard right? >

The guy can't go too much hard right. Usually hard right people don't like people like him. Just saying, unless he's lying about being gay too. >

Early signs? Like memory loss, compulsive lying, and overt criminal behavior? >

Further right than the fascist he already is?