>

Which ironically is the sort of thing you should expect to learn in an Art History class. Things like how religions aren't monoliths, and beliefs can and do change over time.
According to the lawsuit, López Prater’s course syllabus included a note that students would view images of religious figures, including the Prophet Muhammad. The syllabus also included an offer to work with students uncomfortable with viewing those images. She also warned the class immediately before showing the depiction of the Prophet Muhammad.

Seems like the student who made a fuss about it did it intentionally to get her in trouble. An institution of higher education firing a professor over a single complaint is ridiculous. This lawsuit seems like a no-brainer. >

Right? It appears the student was offended even at the thought of anyone seeing an image of Mohammed and chose to stay to get the professor in trouble. >

Even though the image thing is only relatively recent.