>

Is that not just a typo: $60-85k?
Are they accepting overweight middle age dudes >

I'm not overweight, but my body reminds bowling pin upside down and without training, and I'm people person. >

Well that is upmost salary in the range so no, the new hire won't be making that. They will have to completely forgo having a family and will have to entertain the worst, most privileged, assholes in the air, so I bet every penny will be well earned. >


The streaming giant says it is looking for candidates with "independent judgement, discretion and outstanding customer service skills". They should also be able to "operate with little direction and a lot of self-motivation."

There's a few.. sketchy sounding.. terms in there. >

Let me guess, more of the malicious compliance with the requirement to post salary ranges?
“Zero to infinity … open interval, of course.” >

Must know how to handle the cockpit(s) >

Ay que rico! >

They are looking for a high end escort willing to keep secrets, and able to learn basic flight safety. >

I guess that’s not bad for escort work. >

Ah, a perfectly normal thing to spend money on from a company that's not at all in any kind of trouble with the popularity of its products. I give 'em three years before they either bring in new management for a total overhaul or get bought out for pennies on the dollar. You can live it up all you want, but if you keep on losing money the market will spit you out in an instant. >

Would you like coffee, tea or me? >

Gee, I wonder what she'll look like. >

This market range is based on total compensation (vs only base salary), which is in line with our compensation philosophy," 
What does this mean? >

Total compensation = base salary + bonus (for keeping mouth shut)
In line  w/ our philosophy = bullshit we like to promise but will never deliver on, but we could wink,wink >

We can buy flight attendants now? Like, permanently or are we just renting them during the flight?
Oh, it's a salary. I suppose that makes more sense.