>

Actually, after rereading it you might be right. 🤷‍♂️
If you're nervous about losing your job as a public servant because you're a convicted sex offender, you might be a piece of shit. >

What, they’re going to sack Bastard Dave(Carrick), Wayne (Couzens)the rapist, Mark (Lindow)the rapist sex pest……..?
Close ranks boys, can’t be having anyone think we’re a bunch of cunts now.
As an afterthought, is this a higher % of sex pests than the church? >

Around 5% of the clergy are nonces which is in line with the general populace, not sure of the percentage for police >

I can't believe I'm going to say something that sounds like it's in defence of a churches, but isn't that 5% specifically the Catholic Church, and isn't it 5% have been accused?
Clergy is a pretty broad term and there are lots of denominations/sects where child abuse just isn't a major issue. And despite what reddit often loves to think, an accusation is just that. An accusation. >

It’s looking like the churches around the world have just as much a mass child raping problem as the Catholics. 
What the Evangelicals get away with doing to children is far more terrifying Mainly because they try so much harder to hide it. >

I would never let a child anywhere near an Evangelical, accused or not. >

Gonna be hard to find work as a bouncer in London for a while. >

Would you really want these people at clubs around drunk young women? >

I think that’s their point. >

Oh right. Thought they meant the job market for bouncers would be saturated by laid-off coppers, thus hard for folks to get a job.