>

Considering he's almost certainly a Russian agent, this is no surprise.
The hard right is where all the best grifting opportunities lie, he's like a moth to a flame. >

Also, they’re the ones who tolerate the most lies, as long as you have (R) after your name. >

Also, they are the ones most likely to defend the ends justifies the means.
The ones most likely to defend Trump's election lies.
The ones most likely to defend the violence on January 6th.
The ones most likely to say the poor deserve their lot in life because they are lazy and/or stupid. >

You know ... the morons. >

Came for the trashing of George Santos, stayed for the Blazing Saddles reference. >

“Santos is only pawn…in game of life” >

"Candygram for Santos. Candygram for Santos." >

I mean there was the pathological lying >

Don’t forget he also flashed the white power sign while being sworn in >

Not while being sworn in, but during a vote for speaker.  Not that that's any less repugnant. >

No shit.
Did anyone think he was a moderate? >

Moderates themselves are pretty right-leaning so even if he was(which he isn't) he would still be biased toward the right. >

No. There are a lot more moderate Democrats than moderate Republicans. >

Moderate democrats are still securely in the right wing, Jefferies hates the left, pelosi never tried to increase the self awareness or power of labor nor did she push hard for government alleviation of the consequences of capitalism on the population. >

I think you need to do a little more actual studying of politics instead of perusing edgy hyperbole on social media. Moderate Democrats are not right wing in any way, shape or form. Their politics are consistent with the mainstream politics of the rest of the developed world. >

He lies easier than he breathes so I’m not sure why this was ever in question. >

Like literally flashing white power handsigns, yes. >


Early signs? tilting? >

Even that headline. “Appears”? It’s a photo. We see exactly what he’s doing. 
Mainstream journalism in the United States refuses to offend those in power by clearly pointing out the obvious. We saw this when they wouldn’t point out trumps lies for years. It’s fucking infuriating. >

I wouldn’t call NewYork Post mainstream journalism >

Early signs? >


Early signs? tilting? >

That’s the only strategy for him to survive and stay out of prison - lean hard right… >

Seems to be working quite well, though. The first 2 pages of /new on this sub has 13 posts with his name in the headline right now. 
This jackass is following the exact same playbook as Trump and MTG. Feeding the media its outrage porn. >

It's the epitome of baptism by fire. I strongly suspect we've already reached a tipping point where there's so many different scandals with him that if he politically (and criminally) survives the next couple months it will be near impossible for any further scandals to taint him.
Of course his district doesn't leans 5-10 pts blue so they will toss him to the curb in 2024. He's going to milk the next two years for everything he can before he needs to find another avenue for grifting. >


He's going to milk the next two years for everything he can before he needs to find another avenue for grifting.

If he survives the next few months, I don't think he'll need to find another avenue for grifting. It'll find him.