>

Of course. The way life is set up, you have little choice among what is set up, and most people for understandable reasons take the practical route - they have a family to feed and other concerns. That being said, people can start from small things - like not littering, everyone can start from making the community they live in a better place, but even that is sometimes not attainable aside from very socially cooperative Swiss communities perhaps.
Well I guess Erik the Red's going to be vindicated eventually. >

Greenland was warmer when he settled there. The Vikings were able to farm crops that simply cannot be grown there anymore like wheat.
It has to do with ocean currents more than anything else. The world's climate now is technically warmer overall. >

The problem is, there’s only so much individuals can currently do. It’s like trying to limit your exposure to PFAS. Because of corporate policy, they’re in our food and water now. >

Make Greenland green again >

... and the rest of the world under water. >

Well, the most inhabited areas, at least. >

good, we can have sea finally >

Kevin Costner will be happy. >

And all I am reading are governments making coal mines >

This is what climatologists have warned about for decades. 
We are fucked. Hell, it's 75°F here in Texas in JANUARY. 
Weather systems are going to only get worse. Food productions will have to be shifted like they have never been. >

We're not fucked.  Humans have and always will adapt.  Stop being so negative.
incoming reddit rage in 5, 4, 3,........ >

The lucky humans adapt. 
War, disease, natural disaster, etc. People die, and the survivors move on. 
The difference here is that there is no where to run to. 
We ALL aren't gonna die. But humanity in 30 years vs humanity now will definitely appear in the "fucked" form to me. 
Don't even get me started on fertility rates. >

So survival of the fittest then?  Otherwise known as.....nature. >

There is nothing natural about human caused suffering. >

Especially considering we are intelligent enough to make better choices regarding sustainability.
Edit; word >

Maybe if we thought a little less about manufacturing weapons or the latest consumerist fad, could take a step back and focus on making our lives more sustainable. Egotistical human nature becomes unsustainable at scale. >

The problem is, there’s only so much individuals can currently do. It’s like trying to limit your exposure to PFAS. Because of corporate policy, they’re in our food and water now. They’re in packaging we still use. Why? Because a small group of hyper wealthy people genuinely do not care if we live or die. We need to make sustainable choices easier and more accessible, but that’s hard to do with our current ruling class.