>

With all the money spent on ads and attack ads and PACs doing fuck-knows-what with campaign money, it's wild that these allegations weren't just on every TV on the Island. Insane.
The hard right is where all the best grifting opportunities lie, he's like a moth to a flame. >

Also, they’re the ones who tolerate the most lies, as long as you have (R) after your name. >

Also, they are the ones most likely to defend the ends justifies the means.
The ones most likely to defend Trump's election lies.
The ones most likely to defend the violence on January 6th.
The ones most likely to say the poor deserve their lot in life because they are lazy and/or stupid. >

You know ... the morons. >

Came for the trashing of George Santos, stayed for the Blazing Saddles reference. >

“Santos is only pawn…in game of life” >

"Candygram for Santos. Candygram for Santos." >

I mean there was the pathological lying >

Don’t forget he also flashed the white power sign while being sworn in >

Not while being sworn in, but during a vote for speaker.  Not that that's any less repugnant. >

No shit.
Did anyone think he was a moderate? >

Moderates themselves are pretty right-leaning so even if he was(which he isn't) he would still be biased toward the right. >

No. There are a lot more moderate Democrats than moderate Republicans. >

Moderate democrats are still securely in the right wing, Jefferies hates the left, pelosi never tried to increase the self awareness or power of labor nor did she push hard for government alleviation of the consequences of capitalism on the population. >

I think you need to do a little more actual studying of politics instead of perusing edgy hyperbole on social media. Moderate Democrats are not right wing in any way, shape or form. Their politics are consistent with the mainstream politics of the rest of the developed world. >

He lies easier than he breathes so I’m not sure why this was ever in question. >

Like literally flashing white power handsigns, yes. >


Early signs? tilting? >

Even that headline. “Appears”? It’s a photo. We see exactly what he’s doing. 
Mainstream journalism in the United States refuses to offend those in power by clearly pointing out the obvious. We saw this when they wouldn’t point out trumps lies for years. It’s fucking infuriating. >

I wouldn’t call NewYork Post mainstream journalism >

Early signs? >


Early signs? tilting? >

That’s the only strategy for him to survive and stay out of prison - lean hard right… >

Seems to be working quite well, though. The first 2 pages of /new on this sub has 13 posts with his name in the headline right now. 
This jackass is following the exact same playbook as Trump and MTG. Feeding the media its outrage porn. >

It's the epitome of baptism by fire. I strongly suspect we've already reached a tipping point where there's so many different scandals with him that if he politically (and criminally) survives the next couple months it will be near impossible for any further scandals to taint him.
Of course his district doesn't leans 5-10 pts blue so they will toss him to the curb in 2024. He's going to milk the next two years for everything he can before he needs to find another avenue for grifting. >


He's going to milk the next two years for everything he can before he needs to find another avenue for grifting.

If he survives the next few months, I don't think he'll need to find another avenue for grifting. It'll find him. >

Considering he's almost certainly a Russian agent, this is no surprise. >

He should feel right at home. >

Moderate republicans are not part of the gop anymore. This is hardly surprising. >

But they still vote R. >

Right. They certainly are a part of that party. Don’t fool yourself, you know? >

I mean yeah. He's aligning himself with the people most likely to tolerate his chronic pathological lying. >

I’m still not convinced that’s even his name. >

I love how the far right is funded by mainstream Republican money and people buy the “moving to the far right.”  the Republican Party funds the far right, full stop.  Therefore santos didn’t have to move >

Right? All GOP members are hard right. We already have a "moderate right" party. They're called the Democrats. >

Where else would he tilt?  Guy is a total fraud. He’s made for them >

Makes sense. If you’re gonna be a criminal align yourself with the people who protect criminals. The gop is a mob racket. >

Remember kids we wouldn't be here (and wouldn't have the fake democrat Eric Adams) if the NYtimes did its job and actually reported on this earlier instead of puffing up a fake crime wave. >

If you want to blame someone, it isn't the media. Did his Democratic opponent's campaign not do even the most basic opposition research? Even a bit of it? If so, they seem to have chosen to tell nobody about it. That's political malpractice at very best >

Long Island Dems are absolutely responsible for this. They didn't do any oppo research and this was the SECOND TIME Santos ran against a Dem on Long Island. 
Tom Souzzi's campaign fucked up bad but won and then Robert Zimmerman totally flunked his job as a Dem candidate by missing this shit. It's insane. 
With all the fucking money in politics, hire a Private Detective to sniff this shit out. It's probably less than one of the billion media buys they spend their campaign cash on. >

Apparently they did uncover some of it, and sent it to a tiny local paper, but that's all they did with it. Instead of shouting from the rooftops that this asshole was a fraud.