>

At no point did they reflect that they are the government literally trying to control what people say?
The party of small government and don’t tread on me is . . . In the pronoun business now? >

All persons from ND shall hereafter be referred to as IT. >

Ted Cruz said his pronouns were "Kiss My Ass."
I say we take him up on that and deny him bathroom access in the Capitol because there is no Kiss My Ass room. >

Why does anybody care how a person wants to be identified gender-wise?  Seriously, what difference does it make in this legislator's pitiful life? >

It doesn't.
But their entire political ideology is find an "other" and say that group is going to destroy society if they don't destroy the "other" first. >

They can't tell you how, or why with any specificity though! >

That looks exactly like the kind of person that would want to ban pronouns >

Is he even still alive? Was my husband’s response. ☠️ >


Is IT even still alive? Was my husband’s response. ☠️

FIFY >

Go ahead and ban all pronouns.  Everyone must use everyone's full name, every time. >

Bob Dole really was ahead of his time, wasn't he? >

Bob Dole needs company, LaRouche won't stop with the knock-knock jokes. >

Republicans: making up problems and coming up with real mean solutions >

The road to genocide is paved with obvious intentions. >

Senator Clemens looks like he could be identified by all the pronouns. >

Theys literally against the first amendment.  An actual clear violation. >

The same party that constantly says the left is too woke, but “real Americans” care about the cost of gas and groceries. I’d be pissed off if my local politicians were trying to solve the “pronoun problem” instead of true issues. >

We have some people here as weird as the Taliban. We're risking our future by letting them hold office. Only the violent and cruel ascend in a totalitarian theocratic state. This doesn't end well.
People as dumb as Donald Trump have held the highest elected office in this country because hate speech is the love language of a third of us. People as dumb and angry as this dude are working their way up to openly calling for violence. Publicly elected officials in this country are doing some seriously fascist shit. We all need to see it and recognize that we would call it fascist behavior if any other country was in the news for it. All of these true believers will not stop. They are unhinged. >

Senator David Clemens is introducing a bill making it mandatory to misgender people, and I agree with her. You go, girl. >

I mean look at him. I’ve got a 90 year old aunt who looks just alike.  Who are these old flabby uni-body looking slugs to put down the idea of people identifying their preferred pronouns?  I could really use some help with some of them because I can’t see an Adams apple beneath those neck goozles wobbling down there you absolute lard faced fossils. >

Tell me you don't understand the First Amendment without saying you don't understand the First Amendment. >

SCOTUS: "Hold my pube coke..." >

The Radical Free Speech Party wants to control what you call yourself. >

From the author, emphasis, mine.

“Say, they’re a boy, but they come to school and say they’re a girl. As far as that school is concerned in this bill, that person is still a boy. If it becomes contested, the burden will be on the girl, the so-called girl, or the boy, to prove that he is a girl,” said Senator David Clemens, R-West Fargo

You are working as a Senator in the Senate.  An organization that receives state funding.  That will be $1500 please. >

Make it 4500 for all 3! >


House Bill 2199 would basically do two things. First, it would change the definition of gender to the following: “Words used to reference an individual’s sex, gender, gender identity, or gender expression, mean the individual’s determined sex at birth, male or female.” To clarify, that means, under the proposed bill, someone’s sex at birth would, by state law, be their gender. 

They genuinely don’t want trans people to exist, do they. >

The bill in question, North Dakota HB 2199.
They can piss up a rope. >


2. If sex, gender, gender identity, or gender expression is contested, determination is
established by the individual's deoxyribonucleic acid.

"Well, he said he was gay, but I asked his DNA and... well I haven't heard back yet because it's just a string of proteins and can't talk."
What an asinine way to word a bill, yeesh. Enjoy the words striken from amendments, presumably in committee, to fix the rest of the bill to at least be legible. >



2. If sex, gender, gender identity, or gender expression is contested, determination is
established by the individual's deoxyribonucleic acid.


How it started: we're banning the use of pronouns that don't fit the DNA you're born with!
How it's going: so we're gonna have to invent some new pronouns for people with Turner syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Trisomy X, and various other anomalous combinations of X and Y chromosomes. >

Real high on the priority list there, boss. >

The Monty Python Show. >

Why do they hate americans? >

I recently met a guy named Frank. I'm still pissed that I can't call him Jason. Enough of this woke mind virus!!! >

Seems like ND has things pretty figured out and there are no problems at all.  I mean, they pretty much have to be perfect since they're wasting time even talking about this stupidity. >


If it becomes contested, the burden will be on the girl, the so-called girl, or the boy, to prove that he is a girl

Republicans are really keen on looking at children's genital's. >

They need to know who to diddle. >

I walked over to the, to the bench there, and there is, Group W's
where they put you if you may not be moral enough to join the army after
committing your special crime, and there was all kinds of mean nasty ugly
looking people on the bench there. Mother rapers. Father stabbers. Father
rapers! Father rapers sitting right there on the bench next to me! And
they was mean and nasty and ugly and horrible crime-type guys sitting on the
Bench next to me.
And the meanest, ugliest, nastiest one, the meanest father raper of them all, was coming over to me and he was mean 'n' ugly 'n' nasty 'n' horrible and all kind of things and he sat down next to me and said, "Kid, whad'ya get?" I said, "I didn't get nothing, I had to pay $50 and use a different pronoun." He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?" And I said, "Pronoun abuse".  And they all moved away from me on the bench there, and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I said, "And creating a nuisance." >

Good luck with that >


A controversial bill has been introduced by lawmakers involving language surrounding transgender people.
House Bill 2199 would basically do two things. First, it would change the definition of gender to the following: “Words used to reference an individual’s sex, gender, gender identity, or gender expression, mean the individual’s determined sex at birth, male or female.” To clarify, that means, under the proposed bill, someone’s sex at birth would, by state law, be their gender. The second thing it would do would be to require all pronouns used to reflect that definition of gender.
If someone involved in an organization that receives state funding, including public schools, violated the proposed law, they would receive a fine of $1,500.
“Say, they’re a boy, but they come to school and say they’re a girl. As far as that school is concerned in this bill, that person is still a boy. If it becomes contested, the burden will be on the girl, the so-called girl, or the boy, to prove that he is a girl,” said Senator David Clemens, R-West Fargo.

I cannot wait to see all the people who signed that Harper's letter complain about the infringement of free speech here. /S >

He's just taking out his frustrations on those more attractive than himself, since his face looks like a pallid human pickle. >

Being an asshole is now state policy? >

Where is this guys neck? >

He sure looks healthy /s >

Does the whole republican party have social media induced brain rot?
Some days it feels like two thirds of the country needs to log off and touch grass... >

Hope ban nouns next. Would be interesting. /s >

I think what they're building up to is just ban meaning altogether.