>

At this stage I would be happy to see him testifying under oath in a well run setting. Sure he will plead the 5th or I don't recall but even him being confronted by evidence already gathered will be interesting
Conspiracy to defraud the people of Georgia should be the minimum charges for all involved. >

Here's a full analysis from a group of legal experts on possible charges Trump could face in GA:

We conclude that Trump’s post-election conduct in Georgia leaves him at substantial risk of possible state charges predicated on multiple crimes. These charges potentially include: criminal solicitation to commit election fraud; intentional interference with performance of election duties; conspiracy to commit election fraud; criminal solicitation; and state Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act violations. >

I hate every one of the weasel words in this statement >

Unless we have a crystal ball into the future, "potential, possible, risk" are the only words we can use.
The legal analysts writing this report don't decide Trump's fate, unfortunately. They can only speculate. >

“Hate” and “ don’t understand the need for” are two different things. >

Hard to differentiate since a lot of people fall into the latter, but agreed - I hate it too.
Unfortunately, even an indictment isn't a "We got him!" moment. A trial will probably extend well into 2024 and that's not even including appeals. Could be so much longer until we see him actually held accountable, if ever.