>

Hard to differentiate since a lot of people fall into the latter, but agreed - I hate it too.
Unfortunately, even an indictment isn't a "We got him!" moment. A trial will probably extend well into 2024 and that's not even including appeals. Could be so much longer until we see him actually held accountable, if ever.
Conspiracy to defraud the people of Georgia should be the minimum charges for all involved. >

Here's a full analysis from a group of legal experts on possible charges Trump could face in GA:

We conclude that Trump’s post-election conduct in Georgia leaves him at substantial risk of possible state charges predicated on multiple crimes. These charges potentially include: criminal solicitation to commit election fraud; intentional interference with performance of election duties; conspiracy to commit election fraud; criminal solicitation; and state Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act violations. >

I hate every one of the weasel words in this statement >

Unless we have a crystal ball into the future, "potential, possible, risk" are the only words we can use.
The legal analysts writing this report don't decide Trump's fate, unfortunately. They can only speculate. >

“Hate” and “ don’t understand the need for” are two different things.