>

The difference is that now they encourage targeting civilian targets.
Not for long, if recent history is anything to go by. >

Well, a window incident could hardly happen to a nicer fella than this one. >

True that. >

"Now"? As if this is a recent development? >

The difference is that now they encourage targeting civilian targets. >

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 73%. (I'm a bot)


Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov has said that strikes by Russian forces on civilian infrastructure in Ukraine are needed because "We have to fight so that our boys don't die."
During his evening talk show on the Russia-1 channel, Solovyov appeared to give a different take on Moscow's official line, which has repeatedly said that its forces do not strike civilian targets, despite Ukrainian cities enduring barrages of missiles and drone strikes that have hit apartment blocks and energy infrastructure.
A clip of Solovyov's comments was tweeted on Monday by Ukrainian internal affairs adviser Anton Gerashchenko, who said: "Solovyov admits Russia purposefully strikes civilians and civilian infrastructure in Ukraine."


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Solovyov^#1 strike^#2 Ukraine^#3 civilian^#4 die^#5 >

Not for long, if recent history is anything to go by. >

Well, a window incident could hardly happen to a nicer fella than this one. >

True that. >

"Now"? As if this is a recent development?