>

If that person gives them back they would also be committing a felony by furnishing a firearm to a prohibited person
Didn't this just fucking happen in utah? >

yes, in my town. Probably the only thing anyone will ever associate with this town now. >

If you plan on killing yourself and your family, always start with yourself. >

They don't plan on killing themselves. They plan comitting the act of ultimate ownership and control of their children and wives.
The suicide is just the exit after that fact. >

It’s the dead weight of reality setting in.
The fucked up ones are the ones who keep on as normal, pretending their loved ones are missing, and that they’re aiding in the search. >

Yep. Chris Watts comes to mind. >

Also Scott Peterson >

These cases are always so sad. His kids were 18, 16, and 10, old enough to realize that their father had mental problems. He was committed last year? Why or why didn't they remove his gun? >

Because that would be against the 2nd Amendment and that is the only thing that matters in 'Murkia. >


According to records, High Point police received calls to the home as far back as 2014. Police said that two of these were domestic calls, with fights that did not lead to any arrests. In January 2022, they received a medical call and then a request for an involuntary commitment.

If he was actually committed, you are wrong, it is prohibited by federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(4)) for someone who has been involuntarily committed to possess a firearm. Someone in the chain dropped the ball. >

My coworker was involuntarily committed, but he still has his guns. >

That’s the state failing to do its job, a solid personal example. Every day he possesses those firearms and ammunition he is committing a felony, unless he went through the legal process to get those rights restored. >

Yeah, he hasn't. Not sure how that's gonna shake out for him. I think someone's holding onto them for now, but he could demand them back at any time.