comment: >
  
  That’s bold of them to assume they’ll be in control of those areas 9 months from now.
context: They should be planning on elections in Russia >
  
  "elections" >
  
  Erections >
  
  Herschel? >
  
  Do they want a Werewolf over there? >
  
  Please, an ASPIRING werewolf. >
  
  Crazy to assume they will still be occupying them 9 months from now.... >
  
  This is just posturing. Russia will be fortunate to have any boots on the ground in Ukraine by then at the rate they’re losing men and territory. >
  
  I think a lot of people overestimate. they only had about 10 million men of fighting age when they started due to their demographics crisis. now there's 100k dead, another 700k at least have fled, who knows how many captured and wounded, and we are only barely started with winter. there's a reason we are seeing grey haired conscripts, it's because they haven't got enough young people. they know they can't send all the young men to die - they might try but there's a breaking point. >
  
  While we don’t talk about it much, the Ukrainians are bleeding for every inch. They may be heroes, but the sheer human cost of even stalemate would be tremendous; victory may be catastrophic. >
  
  Ukraine has only lost 300 men. >
  
  There is 0 chance that's true >
  
  The mighty 300 >
  
  So, the same kind of "elections" in which Putin gets 127% of the vote? >
  
  Wouldn't it be funny if a Ukrainian saboteur changed every vote to zelensky >
  
  Not like anyone would be counting those votes. >
  
  or casting them if we're honest. >
  
  They only counted blank ballots as voting to join Russia in the last "100% pure honnest and open referendum"! They didn't count any of the "No" votes as a "Yes", mostly because they didn't allow "No" votes to be cast. >
  
  So many of the inhabitants of those regions have fled the war or been forcibly relocated into Russia as prisoners that the results would be 100% illegitimate even without outright forgery. If anyone acts like these elections could be taken seriously in any way, they are either a shill or a moron. >
  
  Would you like to vote for “a puppet” or “this bullet to the back of your head”?  Thanks for participating in this free and fair election. >
  
  September 2023? How will they hold elections in territories they don't have? >
  
  Maybe it doesn't matter at all. They don't need to hold the territories to invent the results. They could even claim that 110% of New-Yorkers voted to join Russia. >
  
  Eh... Didn't they already hold votes and only North Korea respects the outcome? I'm confused. >
  
  Early polls have Putin winning 121% of the vote. >
  
  And his popularity is up by 1600%! >
  
  1600% of zero is still zero >
  
  Lol, "occupied" as if they'll still be there in September. >
  
  Bold of them to assume they'll have control at that point. >
  
  By the time September rolls around Ukraine will be in Moscow. >
  
  By then, Ukraine may be holding elections in Western Russia. >
  
  You mean Eastern Ukraine? >
  
  Kievan Rus* >
  
  The Kremlin has already proven they can't plan shit. >
  
  So no elections. Ok >
  
  They can have the half a bridge they have I guess.... >
  
  Only the part that's in the water... >
  
  All of it then this time next year? >
  
  The territories that they are currently shelling. >
  
  Yeah go send your politicians to Ukraine, make sure you fill their pockets with lots of sunflower seeds. >
  
  It is not even certain Russian forces will be occupying Russia come September 2023. >
  
  Kremin "plans" "elections" in "occupied" territories of Ukraine in September 2023. >
  
  I thought Ukraine had already elected to kick them tf out... >
  
  I don't think it's a good idea to give a deadline to Ukraine, it will just give more motivation to kick these morons in the butt >
  
  One bombed out building, one vote.
  Democracy!! >
  
  Lol that's brave to think they will still hold those lands in Sept of 23... >
  
  In other news, the tooth fairy has decided to join the Russian electoral commission. >
  
  I am 101 % sure what the outcome will be >
  
  That's optimistic >
  
  So Belgorod then? >
  
  Best not skip your Nuremberg trial Russia >
  
  “Elections” >
  
  Why not yesterday ? Since they have he results already >
  
  Choices will be: A) Surrender, or, B) RUN BITCH, RUN!! >
  
  And C) DANCE MOTHERF***ER >
  
  Right Elections 
  Choice between Putin and Putin and Gulag >
  
  It would require the Donbass to still be under Russian occupation. >
  
  Shut the fuck up and withdraw from Ukraine >
  
  Didn't they literally already do this trick? >
  
  There aren't going to be any occupied territories by September 2023. >
  
  if it happened, not matter thematic of it, "edinaya rossiya" will won with 146 percent voices. >
  
  Yeah, that and the cybertruck >
  
  Look at that , they're bringing democracy to Europe . Thank you Mr.Putin . >
  
  Ha ha ha. As of they will be there then >
  
  Great, new assassination targets - they're running low on 'officials'