comment: >
  
  JFC people need to lighten the hell up. I can't even imagine the kind of person who is upset about this? Did their boyfriend cheat on them once and now it's a trigger? Get bent you fucking fun police.
context: I don’t see what was wrong with their ad.  Looked fine and inline with today’s standards. >
  
  I’m not sure where you’re from, but Massachusetts was settled by Puritans and Worcester is fairly conservative compared to present-day Boston. Their comment that it was “insensitive” is not at all surprising from a government office there. It’s also not at all surprising that no one was offended by it either. It’s a distinct set of cultures in this state, and certainly a bizarre mix. >
  
  More conservative than Boston still means that their Democratic Rep. won with 66%. >
  
  How is this insensitive? >
  
  It's the Puritans that found it insensitive, the same people who were so insufferable that they were essentially kicked out of Europe. If that answers your question. >
  
  It is not lost on me that this is why I avoid most people and yet here I am on Reddit lol >
  
  It's interesting that the article didn't cite a single comment where anyone was outraged. The term "insensitive" was used by the company. I'm willing to bet that maybe a couple people called it tacky, but it seems like this title is typical clickbait to get people passing it around and complain about how people are too sensitive or cancel culture or whatever. Judging by the comments here, congrats to Telegram, I guess.