comment: >
  
  I didn’t even have to check, of course it’s the party of fraud.
context: Tried to help her husband's political career and ended up destroying it and her own life in the process. >
  
  Supreme court material. >
  
  I don't know if I trust them to judge anything right or true anymore. >
  
  You shouldn’t. They’re blatantly corrupt. >
  
  I've been thinking about this and it's dawned on me that all current republican politicians are simply the kids of rich people. The kids of rich people that act out and are cruel because nobody ever held them accountable. >
  
  Yes. Like the other guy said, it's always been a class war dividing the few at the top from the rest of us. The cultures wars are manufactured to get people to vote Republican against their better interests.
  
  "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." -- LBJ
  
  It's absurd what goes on on Fox "News" to reach this end goal. They don't report on the news. It's all propaganda to make people vote in ways that hurt themselves just so they can hurt someone they don't like even more.
  And, unfortunately for society and humanity at large, it's incredibly effective. >
  
  Fox should be dismantled >
  
  Better yet... force them to live among their subjects instead of NY DC and LA >
  
  Notice how voter fraud isn't some invisible, untraceable thing. You can actually gather evidence, charge someone with it, and present it in a court of law. Who knew? >
  
  No that was a shitty thing to do. It was definitely called out for the wrong reasons at the time (unbecoming of a person in his position), but you can’t tell me he didn’t use his power to get an intern to give him a bj. We should call it out for what it is and not turn a blind eye to it. >
  
  Well, her side of the story is that she went after it, and she's an adult with agency. That said, he still had an obligation to say no. He has no way of knowing her mind in that moment (or at all). He needs to assume that the power dynamic is in play, and he needs to separate himself from that situation purely on those simple ethical grounds, let alone all of the unique things that come with his being POTUS at the time. 
  What Bill Clinton did was wrong. The reaction to it from the right and the gall of impeaching him for lying about it was over the top. >
  
  From all accounts that I’ve read she wanted to and everyone got off on the secrecy. There wasn’t an ‘I’m upper management, suck it or you’re fired” situation happening. She was pretty clear on her not feeling pressured into it.
  Was it ethical? Nope.
  Did two consenting adults make an unethical decision together regardless? Yaaass
  If anyone doesn’t “get it” at this point then I’m sorry- you most likely never will. >
  
  
  From all accounts that I’ve read she wanted to and everyone got off on the secrecy. There wasn’t an ‘I’m upper management, suck it or you’re fired” situation happening. She was pretty clear on her not feeling pressured into it.  
  Was it ethical? Nope.
  
  Monica Lewinski gave an incredibly nuanced interview a while back how #meetoo made here think about the power dynamics in their case. She still goes out of her way to make sure that, yes, it was her free decision and she wanted it but, in hindsight, it would have been ethical of Bill Clinton to not do it. >
  
  I was a kid when it happened but just think of how joyous and ravenous conservative talking heads and politicians were when they first found out about it on the news etc. They were probably literally salivating at the revelation when thinking of how they could spin it all to their advantage. Ethics has nothing of substance in politics. >
  
  The GOP is going to very publicly investigate and make an example of her, now that they finally have a verified case of voter fraud, right? /S >
  
  Any minute now.... Aaaaaaand now she's a senator. >
  
  About time. >
  
  Republican???
  checks article...
  Yep! >
  
  Party affiliation wasn't in the headline, that means republican. >
  
  Spicy layered meme, well played. >
  
  Where is the meme? This is just fact. >
  
  It's the same rhetoric those assholes use with the news "if they don't say the race, they're a minority" its just using their dumbass logic on them. >
  
  I've noticed the opposite. If American headlines don't mention someone's race, it's safe to assume they're white. >
  
  The party of law and order does it again! >
  
  Pfft, laws are for browns and poors! 
  What? Me?! I'm not poor! I'm just not rich yet!
  ...I was gonna slap "/s" on here...but is it really sarcasm anymore? >
  
  So not a brown, was she a poor? Unlikely given her husbands position >
  
  But she's married to a white guy. Changes a little >
  
  One shes a woman so shes looked down upon in republican circles anyways and shes a women of color ? Might as well be invisible, and her partner the straight white male would be the "figure head" of the family, it changes a lot when you are married to a "Straight white right wing male politician".
  Look at ole mitch mconnels wife, she is literally connected back to the CCP and ole donny barely attacked her..Then look at the attacks he made on every single democrat thats female or of color, "Mexicans"/"Pocahontas"/"Bleeding from somewhere" as long as you are on team grift they dont care. >
  
  Just another demonstration that voter fraud is extremely rare, and usually committed by Republicans. >
  
  And that it is actually catchable. If enough evidence is found.
  And they caught it in this relatively small House race. Under the biggest one, the Presidential race, with the most eyes, nothing came up as concrete as this case. >
  
  I remember at some point after the 2020 election, some Republicans insisting there was no evidence of the massive voter fraud they were claiming because Democrats were just that good at voter fraud.  Absence of evidence was actually proof of voter fraud in their minds. >
  
  Not the first time they believe something is there without evidence to prove its presence >
  
  My first thought, as well. >
  
  Voter fraud: a Republican's specialty >
  
  For real.  I don't recall any people committed fraud in the that election except Republicans. >
  
  While they're having a field day over Biden's document "scandal", they defend their false emperor in Trump over the same thing. They honestly think Trump legit stealing is the less than Biden finding out documents are found around his place. Who wants to bet Biden is gonna return the documents, no muss no fuss while defend Trump for theft? >
  
  They found them and reported it, which is the only reason we even know about them. My bet is that now they're going to dig through everything without any obstruction and make sure nothing else is there, like it should be. >
  
  
  My bet is that now they're going to dig through everything without any obstruction…
  
  Not “now”, though. Already happened. That’s how they found the second handful of documents. So on the one hand we have Biden, whose lawyers found less than 2 dozen documents and immediately took steps to turn them over and make sure there were no others. On the other, we have Trump who had literally hundreds of documents, fought against returning them for months and had people lie on his behalf about them.
  Edit: typo >
  
  Don’t forget the part where he sold a bunch to other nations. And probably buried more on his golf course. >
  
  I prefer to deal with what’s known rather than speculation. >
  
  Not only is it once again a Republican, but once again the system worked.  The person committing voting fraud got caught and also failed to influence the outcome of an election. >
  
  Her husband came in third in the republican primary. didn't affect anything. he got stomped. >
  
  Sounds like the perfect situation to put your neck on the line by committing voter fraud! >
  
  Remember, every accusation is a confession. >
  
  It’s always projection with the GOP. From voter fraud to cp & human trafficking, they’re always the folks committing the crimes they holler about dems doing. >
  
  I think it's a 'I do this (or would if I could) so everyone else must be'. >
  
  It's the Karl Rove playbook.
  
  Acknowledge (privately) you're doing something bad.
  Accuse your opponent of doing that bad thing first.
  When your own bad deeds are uncovered, accuse your opponent of making it up to distract from their own bad deeds from step 2.
  
  Repeat. >
  
  Oh look. Voter fraud. From a republican. Mild shock >
  
  They telegraph their Playbook by accusing others of their own crimes. If THEY did it, surely everyone else does it too, right???? >
  
  You notice how it's almost always extremist republicans, the party who wail about voter fraud who are then caught up in voter fraud cases. 52 counts of voter fraud?! If you're going to lose, lose and go to jail. >
  
  And I get the impression most of them are 'true believers'. They think, "well those dirty democrats are cheating left and right and getting away with it, it's only right that I do it as well to balance the scale." >
  
  Of course, it's a Republican. >
  
  Didn't even need to read the article to know. >
  
  Read this as “Iowa’s official wife” and my curiosity was quite piqued. >
  
  And it's a republican. Please someone save me from this fucking timeline already. >
  
  This is the type of asshole that would say “my husband needs to be elected to protect our freedom and democracy!”… while undermining democracy herself.
  Honestly, these pricks need to be charged  a count of voter fraud for all the VALID ballots cast because those are the ones she is effectively trying to disenfranchise. >
  
  50 I get. But 52?! Geez lady, that's just greedy. >
  
  Try not to commit any voter fraud on the way out to the parking lot! >
  
  Of course, it's a Republican. >
  
  How? How is it ALWAYS Republicans? >
  
  Gaslight
  Oppress
  Project >
  
  Fetterman still collecting on the Ken Paxton challenge?