comment: >
  
  He knows all about bullshit is what he knows!
context: Literally thinks women are there for his consumption. >
  
  I like eating out women myself, but I get your point >
  
  Make sure you are vaccinated against HPV. Please. Consume responsibly. >
  
  Can I really get HPV by munching box? >
  
  Women voting Republican is something I can't understand. >
  
  Many just vote the way their husband does. They probably consume less political "news" in general and their main source of information is the spouse, so they get a Fox News curated version of events. Especially those that were raised to be subservient to their husband (it's a Bible thing). >
  
  Lots of “Conservative Christian” women behave in the way the previous poster described. My mother-in-law votes however her husband does because he is the “head of the household” and she doesn’t want to negate his vote. 
  She is not the only “Conservative Christian” woman who does the same thing - trust their husband to think for them. >
  
  “Not only were his comments offensive and embarrassing, they were odd, given that he was simply introducing himself to the House Agriculture Committee,” stated the editorial. “This was how he chose to introduce himself, by comparing women’s health care with milking a cow?”
  Hey, Jack we just need you to say your name and a bit about why you’re here. 
  Great! You think they want to hear my thoughts on trans rights?
  Nope, just an intro. 
  War in Ukraine?
  Really just your name, Jack…
  TedTalk on women’s bodies it is! >
  
  Women? Cattle? He sees no difference here. >
  
  They are both found on the farm >
  
  They also “love” them both >
  
  Forget the apology, I wanna know what his "definite opinions" are.
  Like, I know how cows are inseminated..... 
  And I know that they are literal livestock, whose reproductive processes are tightly controlled and exploited for the benefit of others.... >
  
  I mean. We have the famous quote "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."
  So they literally see women as livestock. >
  
  Why stop at that one? >
  
  Sigh. 
  I’m so fucking tired of this.
  Why do people vote for the GOP? >
  
  Because a large portion of our population is dumb and spiteful. >
  
  Referring to it as “The women’s health thing” sure is a doozy as well. >
  
  You know, instead of saying insane shit, how about you just educate yourself. There's a book for that. >
  
  Books are like kryptonite to a republican. >
  
  Books have a known liberal bias >
  
  I mean the bull only gets to breed once a year so republicans should follow the same advice. >
  
  Sometimes the bull doesn’t mate at all, they just take his sperm. Hear that republicans, no more sex with your wife, now some farmer just jacks you off instead >
  
  I’d bet that’s already happening for a lot of these closeted repubs >
  
  He knows all about bullshit is what he knows! >
  
  “I’ve milked a few cows, spent most of my time walking behind lines of cows, so if you want some ideas on repro and the women’s health thing, I have some definite opinions,” freshman Rep. Jack Nelsen, a retired dairy farmer, said earlier this week when introducing himself to the state’s House Agriculture Committee, according to the Idaho State Journal.
  A dairy farmer wants to give his opinion on women's health care. A. Dairy. Farmer. >
  
  Another deep thinker, brought to you by the Santos party. >
  
  More scientific ignorance coupled with religious bigotry, misogyny and homophobia. >
  
  At this point it's not what he said or that he said it. It's that they feel comfortable making these statements at all.
  I'd be absolutely livid if someone said they know what men need because they grew up with dogs. >
  
  Oh my, now that is disturbing!  What kind of relationship does this guy have with cows???  I hope the PETA or the SPCA or some animal welfare group is looking into this! >
  
  I know cows too and this is bullshit..../s? >
  
  So most of his "arrangements" with women involved a tank of liquid nitrogen and artificial insemination?  
  Ohh that is cold. >
  
  Spits out drink >
  
  Around 50% of his votes came from women, and he will not lose a single one of them. >
  
  Where did you find that information? I can't find it anywhere. >
  
  Vets abort cows. I know that for a fact. >
  
  Speaking of cows, I call bullshit. >
  
  Really feel sorry for his wife if cows were his sex education. >
  
  By his logic, a proctologist whose looked at a lot of assholes would therefore be an expert on Republicans. >
  
  I study cockroaches and other similar insects...I guess that makes me an expert on Conservatives...right? >
  
  Women if this man approaches you with a flamethrower demanding to see them udders - Run! >
  
  This seems to sum up how the GOP see women in general… livestock. >
  
  Ah, so women are essentially livestock. I find this comparison uniquely disturbing…. It’s sort of like saying that women, despite being part of the species Homo sapiens, have the sapience/sentience of an animal with less brain volume, like rodents or farm animals. 
  And therefore, they can be herded around like livestock, and treated like livestock. To believe something like this you would have to be incredibly stupid and utterly incapable of empathy. Fascinating. 
  Sorry everyone just the drunk thoughts coming out… >
  
  I bet his cows were stump-broke, too. >
  
  I have a chicken. I'm a menstruation expert. >
  
  How intimately does he know cows? >
  
  I mean isn't the Republican dream to treat women like livestock and control everything they do? >
  
  Given his party has a bunch of karen cows in it, no wonder he feels he's the expert in the herd. Needs his spec savers on though. >
  
  Time to grant cows autonomy over their own bodies, too? Oh, we’re not there yet… >
  
  I know milk. >
  
  It’s udder madness. >
  
  And, there are a whole bunch of Republican women voters who think that's just fine with them. "Sure, treat my daughter like the heifer she is!" >
  
  His mama?  His sister? His aunt ?  That would make him a bull. So he will be expected to come out with this sort of bull shit for the foreseeable future?? >
  
  The Idaho Statesman in the article nailed it
  
  The newspaper updated the editorial following Nelsen’s apology. But the editorial board wasn’t particularly reassured.
  It “appreciated” Nelsen’s apology. But it also noted that he may be simply following a “playbook that’s proven successful in the past: Say something stupid, apologize contritely and then continue to vote in a manner that comports with the underlying attitude that your words conveyed.” >
  
  Dude is seriously referring to women as heifers.  I should be pissed, but nowadays I’m just unsurprised and tired. >
  
  He’s not black so instead of his headshot they put random cows >
  
  Dick move and a load of bull shit
  I’d say for his GOP female constituents this is a case of “leopards eating my face” but that the wrong metaphor in this case, lol >
  
  Literally thinks women are there for his consumption. >
  
  I like eating out women myself, but I get your point >
  
  Make sure you are vaccinated against HPV. Please. Consume responsibly. >
  
  Can I really get HPV by munching box? >
  
  Yes. Many head and neck cancers in men have been linked to HPV in the same way cervical cancers have been linked to HPV in women. >
  
  Women voting Republican is something I can't understand. >
  
  Many just vote the way their husband does. They probably consume less political "news" in general and their main source of information is the spouse, so they get a Fox News curated version of events. Especially those that were raised to be subservient to their husband (it's a Bible thing). >
  
  Lots of “Conservative Christian” women behave in the way the previous poster described. My mother-in-law votes however her husband does because he is the “head of the household” and she doesn’t want to negate his vote. 
  She is not the only “Conservative Christian” woman who does the same thing - trust their husband to think for them. >
  
  “Not only were his comments offensive and embarrassing, they were odd, given that he was simply introducing himself to the House Agriculture Committee,” stated the editorial. “This was how he chose to introduce himself, by comparing women’s health care with milking a cow?”
  Hey, Jack we just need you to say your name and a bit about why you’re here. 
  Great! You think they want to hear my thoughts on trans rights?
  Nope, just an intro. 
  War in Ukraine?
  Really just your name, Jack…
  TedTalk on women’s bodies it is! >
  
  Women? Cattle? He sees no difference here. >
  
  They are both found on the farm >
  
  They also “love” them both >
  
  Forget the apology, I wanna know what his "definite opinions" are.
  Like, I know how cows are inseminated..... 
  And I know that they are literal livestock, whose reproductive processes are tightly controlled and exploited for the benefit of others.... >
  
  I mean. We have the famous quote "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."
  So they literally see women as livestock. >
  
  Why stop at that one? >
  
  Sigh. 
  I’m so fucking tired of this.
  Why do people vote for the GOP? >
  
  Because a large portion of our population is dumb and spiteful. >
  
  Referring to it as “The women’s health thing” sure is a doozy as well. >
  
  You know, instead of saying insane shit, how about you just educate yourself. There's a book for that. >
  
  Books are like kryptonite to a republican. >
  
  Books have a known liberal bias >
  
  I mean the bull only gets to breed once a year so republicans should follow the same advice. >
  
  Sometimes the bull doesn’t mate at all, they just take his sperm. Hear that republicans, no more sex with your wife, now some farmer just jacks you off instead >
  
  I’d bet that’s already happening for a lot of these closeted repubs