comment: >
  
  Yes and Lockheed Martin could fly a drone over their heads and all 500 soldiers would say "i saw a UFO" because that's what it means. It's just unidentified.   
  Also they changed the term to UAP unidentified aerial phenomena, so they're using the UFO term again? Or is this selective language so they can say they never said anything? lol
context: Given all of the current and impending geopolitical tension (Russia v Ukraine, China v Taiwan, N Korea v everyone, etc etc), I wouldn't be surprised if the US has been ramping up testing of their top secret aircraft tech over the last couple of years. >
  
  I mean technically thats actually what Area 51 was. They were just testing R&D for drones and shit out there long before the public even knew what a drone was. I actually had a special forces friend who said he believed in aliens because he was actually stationed out there and heard some DOE guys talking secretly about what i now know from the way they described it was probably the gimbal footage.
  But you know what they say, if your tool is a hammer every problem becomes a nail, and if your tool is meth every bird becomes a CIA drone designed to steal your secrets. >
  
  The CIA drones can't steal my secrets when I'm literally giving them away taps forehead >
  
  Unidentified doesn't mean aliens. Just something that wasn't identifiable. >
  
  And most likely drones. >
  
  If the Space Brothers were humanity's friends, they would likely have been up-front about it by now. Alas, since UFO sightings seem correlated with military bases, any lights in the sky are likely we humans. We has met the aliens, and them is us. >
  
  "unidentified" really says more about the viewer than the flying object. >
  
  No, it doesn't. Not in the context of "UFO". 
  The term was created by the United States Air Force as a catch-all for intelligently controlled craft. The "Unidentified" portion of it applies to the technology, behavior, & origin. "Object" is understood to be a craft or machine, for lack of a better term. 
  It's not for a viewer who can't quite tell if something is a bird or a balloon. >
  
  Technically a balloon could be a ufo.