comment: >
  
  Waaaaaay overdue
context: For context: AfS (Alternativ för Sverige, Alternative for Sweden) is a far-right political party, and NMR (Nordiska Motståndsrörelsen, The Nordic Resistance Movement) is Sweden’s largest neo-nazi group >
  
  Is Afs related to the German afd? >
  
  Yes and no. No, they aren't an internationalized party, but the right-wing populist to fascist parties of Europe maintain close relations with each other and with Russia. >
  
  
  Shapiro told Expo that he is happy to answer questions concerning his journalism, but that he does not want to answer questions concerning whether he has been involved in contacts between Nya Dagbladet and FLI.
  “I have no comment on that”, he stated in response to our questions.
  
  So I take that as a yes then, since Max Tegmark (the MIT professor) is his brother. 
  
  Markus Andersson, the editor-in-chief of Nya Dagbladet, had little to say to Expo upon hearing our questions about the newly-registered foundation, ending the call with the words: “You may not ask any questions at all. You can go to hell.”
  
  Lol >
  
  MIT you say? Interesting. Should be fun seeing where this goes in the next couple weeks >
  
  I should say so >
  
  
  Nya Dagbladet received a message: the foundation to promote “independent journalism” that he was in the process of setting up had been approved a major grant of money. The sum of $100,000 – about one million in Swedish currency 
  
  BRB, have to go start a foundation for sexy parties uhhhh I mean journalism. >
  
  Nobody is reading the article. The non profit group that is also funded by musk and Morgan freeman did not pass a regulation process.it was a grant and failed. 
  This is a non story…and Tesla fud. >
  
  
  The non profit group that is also funded by musk and Morgan freeman 
  
  The article says that Elon Musk funds the group, but that Morgan Freeman is merely listed as an advisor, so they would seem to be pretty different positions. Did you bother to read the article? >
  
  I did, did you read the headline? >
  
  Feel free to quote the part of the article where it says Morgan Freeman funded the Future of Life Institute. I feel silly having to repeat myself because this is such a simple concept to grasp, but in deference to your struggles with this here you go: the article says Elon Musk funded it, but Freeman is only an advisor. You can find this information elsewhere online if you think this article is not credible. Wikipedia says Morgan Freeman is merely one of many advisors, whereas Elon Musk gave them $10 million. Sorry, but Musk is funding a Nazi organization. >
  
  So Morgan Freeman advised a pro nazi group? Think about it. Why wasn’t that put in the headline? >
  
  What advice did Morgan Freeman give? Do you know the answer to that? If he advised against this, do you still think he's culpable? What if this was done without his input at all? Musk, on the other hand, is paying for this. That's his $100k that wound up in the pockets of Nazis. I would wager that Musk has more of a say-so of what happens with the finances than Morgan Freeman does, considering it's Musk's money, not Freeman's. You Musk defenders are ridiculous with the gymnastics you go through to try to apologize for that asshole. >
  
  You obviously don’t know about headlines. >
  
  Yeah, if this letter is genuine, and went out before the “non profit” paperwork had even gone through, I’m very curious to know how that connection came about, and why the FLI guys felt so passionately about the issues that they were proactively okayed a $100K grant to an org that didn’t even exist yet. 
  Because the associated website has gone viral a few times, but for reasons that don’t exactly scream “deep thinkers worthy of major funding”. That’s just me though. >
  
  Elon musk supporting Nazis who would have guessed it? Almost everyone's? Oh ok. >
  
  Oh please... You say it like his background somehow would have like ties with an oppresive and racist system like the "Apartheid" or something and how his family profited off of it
  Oh wait that's literally true
  Weird uh? >
  
  The only thing I didn't see coming is that Musk would have the good sense to launder the money through a third party rather than donate to the Nazis directly. >
  
  Why not? Centrist dumbfucks will still defend Elon Musk anyway >
  
  It's really an example of one of the "Famous Moments in History, Reimagined By Centrists" >
  
  Im thinkin it might be time to take a harder look at "nonprofits"