comment: >
  
  You can’t be a good person and Republican at the same time. Supporting that genocidal party is actually in direct contradiction to what a “good person” would do.
context: Under Arizona law, "The records containing a voter's signature...shall not be accessible or reproduced by any person other than the voter."
  A violation of the law is a Class 6 felony that could carry jail time. 
  
  Seems pretty clear that Lake broke the law. And to put those signatures out on Twitter of all places is just asking for people to be doxxed >
  
  I do agree, but until someone decides to enforce that law, it's meaningless. >
  
  And you can be sure if one thing:
  She will not see an iota of consequences for this.
  Nothing. >
  
  FFS. This just happened. Can you let the process have half a chance to work before you decide it already has failed? >
  
  Poster is highly likely to be correct. >
  
  Maybe. Maybe not. You don't know. No one does. But this rush to always be the first one to claim the system is going to fail is getting really tiresome. >
  
  Look at the last 6-7 years. We kinda have enough history of these matters to know that she has at a minimum of 6 years for nothing bad to happen. >
  
  You don't know that. You believe that. There is a significant difference between those two. It would be really nice if you would learn that. 
  And there are so many things that are different between this case and so many of the others you've seen that using them to predetermine the outcome here is entirely misguided. 
  First, this is a state issue so it's different players. Second, this is a ex-anchorwoman not a powerful politician. Third, this is a pretty straight-forward case with clear evidence and an unambiguous, uncomplicated law. Fourth, many of the issues you think nothing will happen with are still moving forward. For example, we just heard about the developments in Georgia with the grand jury that experts believe show an indictment of Trump for tampering is extremely likely and not too far off. >
  
  Alright, I understand where you're coming from. Would you at least agree it will take more than 2 years? January 6th was way worse then this, and all the "voter fraud" stuff was on par. >
  
  No, I'm sorry but I am not going to make a guess about what will happen just to make you feel better. We'll know what will happen when it happens, not before. 
  But if two years from now nothing has happened, I will gladly agree nothing happened in two years. And I will be pissed about it then if that's how it ends up. >
  
  How does any decent human being still support Republicans? >
  
  They don't. >
  
  They see the racism, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They see the sexism, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They see the homophobia, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They see the transphobia, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They see the xenophobia, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They see the stripping of rights, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They see the outright Nazi support, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They see the vile vocal hatred, and they still vote for Republicans.
  They can say they are against one or more of those things for whatever reason they would like.  The fact remains, none of those things are deal breakers.  They are willing to overlook all of them for whatever gain they percieve.
  There is no such thing as a decent and good person that still votes for the Republican party.
  I know, I know..."My parents/grandparents/friends/spouse/sibling/cousin/roommate/ what-the-fuck-ever votes Republican and I think they are a good person!".
  No.  No they are not.  They support all of that by voting Republican.  You are blinded by your relationship with that person. >
  
  They might be good people, but those who are, are woefully and/or willfully dumb, which makes them dangerous which ultimately makes them bad people.