comment: >
  
  They were already planning on that anyways. 
  Transnistria anyone?
context: Now Russia, you shouldn't be asking for second Ukraine when you can't even finish one! >
  
  "He knows about First Ukraine, but has he heard of Second Ukraine?"
  Worst hobbit ever! >
  
  That Took is a Gamgee in comparison >
  
  A graveyard for Russian rapists? >
  
  Moldova can't resist the same way Ukraine does. >
  
  I'd argue against that. Transnistria has no land connection to russia and any planes to resupply would be targeted by ukrainian air defense regardless. Russia would be absolutely destroyed if they tried that offensive and this is purely russian internal propaganda at play >
  
  Like Zelensky keeps saying if the world thinks Putin is going to stop at Ukraine they're clueless. Give Ukraine whatever the fuck they need now. >
  
  If Russia isn’t stopped in Ukraine, they’ll have to be stopped in the next country over, or the next, or the next. Best to get it out of the way early. >
  
  Wasn’t there another guy in Europe at some point that ran through countries because of appeasement policies? 
  If we could go back and handle that time differently knowing what happened, we would right? Like, we’d know it was truly a slippery slope to let him just start gobbling up neighbors? >
  
  I know when I'm locked in a stalemate with a guy 1/5th my size the first thing I do is turn to his friend and say "You're next, pal." >
  
  Thank you for making my day with that visual. I was left with the facial expression by the  bigger guy.... utterly perplexed. >
  
  With the same ease we can state that Russia's actions are  “fundamental threats” against the rest of the World. >
  
  Thereby making the case that everyone has to back Ukraine and winning this war quickly and decisively. Bullies need to be put back in their box.