comment: >
  
  I mean... seems like just the two? And the White House I guess.
context: I am glad that the search was conducted.  DOJ is acting properly. >
  
  Yes, now do all of Trump's locations. >
  
  Check Ivana's casket. >
  
  *Ivana. Ivanka is his daughter and very much alive. >
  
  Though you could probably start a “Ivanka is dead and was replaced by a clone” rumor in a Qanon forum somewhere and get quite the traction >
  
  Not dead. Living with JFK junior in the Kennedy compound. >
  
  With the Bill's player, Hamlin, and Elvis once he came back from his alien abduction. >
  
  Elvis wasn't abducted. He faked his death to join the CIA. Elvis impersonators were then encouraged to spread worldwide. They provide him cover. That way, if there's an Elvis sighting in Moscow, it's disregarded. Wake up, sheeple! >
  
  The Elvis Identity >
  
  An international spy who dresses as an Elvis impersonator to hide in plain sight? I'd totally watch that movie, as long as we get a gritty version of Suspicious Minds in the trailer. >
  
  What a world we live in when NOT finding classified materials in unsecured locations is headline news >
  
  Meanwhile on the Warthunder Forums... >
  
  New security background check: Are you part of the WT community? >
  
  Not sure if you're joking, but there have been actual reports of that being asked in such situations. >
  
  And Raytheon explicitly denied it. And the guy who posted it admitted to making it up. >
  
  
  And Raytheon explicitly denied it. And the guy who posted it admitted to making it up.
  
  Sorry bro, if you want me to believe you, please show me the link on the warthunder forums to the Raytheon internal staff manual >
  
  Meanwhile Cheney, Gore, and Quayle probably have some poor assistant furiously combing through old documents.
  Pence has already turned all of his over recently, or so he claims. Clinton, Bush, and Obama say they have none. Carter already cleared his home in the 80s, but the law in question didn’t even apply to his administration . >
  
  Dan Quayle is happy someone’s remembered him. It’s insane to think that he became VP 35 years ago yet is younger than both Trump and Biden. >
  
  That just broke my brain >
  
  This made me think of how mad republicans were that Bernie had two homes, while they cheered for having mar-a-lago being the winter White House. >
  
  Can't wait to hear how this is even worse than if they found documents. >
  
  Obviously hunter biden put them in his laptop and sent them to hillary’s emails >
  
  The files are IN the computer! >
  
  GOP: Where is he hiding them?! >
  
  They must be on Hunter Biden's laptop. (eyeroll) >
  
  They are actually wrapped around his dick. >
  
  Sick new government funded cock ring. Who knew old Joe was that adventurous. >
  
  Thumb drive is so 2010. You gotta get the new dick drive. >
  
  Well of course not. Everyone knows that the classified documents are on Hunter Biden's laptop. >
  
  No, the laptop was where they kept the under-aged hookers and crackpipe selfies. >
  
  Within a password protected directory called "STORMY_DANIELS_SPANK_BANK" >
  
  At least it confirms he has a decent work-life balance. >
  
  For real tho the one story I havnt heard is what the documents pertain to. Did I miss that? My question is whether these were VP docs (at least some were, the ones at the Penn Center) or Pres docs. Biden is about the worst test case because he can say anything in his home is something he needed for his current admin. And like obv presidents should protect docs like every other federal employee, but also if these were docs he took home and hadn’t brought back that’s very different again. 
  Imo the media is trying very hard to make this another ‘both sides’ story when there are a lot of material questions that need to be asked first. >
  
  The docs they found initially for Biden were VP era docs (they were in a locked closet in an office he used pre-presidency). Not sure about the docs they found in his House (or office, some other place than the first office.) >
  
  I think some in the second batch went as far back as his senate days >
  
  I would hope not! This house is meant for throwing back some brews and taking a breather. >
  
  And working that bitchen tan. >
  
  I remember one time during Obama’s presidency when my brother shouted for my mother to come look at the TV. Obama and Biden were on the screen and, due to CNN’s cameras, the lighting at the White House, or some alignment of the stars, they were both the same color lol >
  
  Biden is secretly a chameleon. >
  
  FoxNews: Which only proves that it's the EXACT same scenario as Mar-a-Lago. /s >
  
  The Republicans will certainly have to investigate why there weren't any there. >
  
  They won’t bother. Their news will be full of stories about the search. Not the results. >
  
  He clearly hid the piles and piles of classified documents he had stashed there. >
  
  “The FBI claims they found no documents, but this is FBI after all, the same people who hunt fine folks like you for standing up for Freedom and America. So we’re no documents really found? You decide America.” >
  
  Read this in Tuckers voice. >
  
  Biden is weaponizing the doj against Biden >
  
  The FBI seems super quick on this compared to how they dragged their feet for a whole year before looking into Cheeto Benito. >
  
  Because Biden cooperated and they had to get a court order for Trump. >
  
  IIRC, FBI pushed back on DOJ for months before finally agreeing to search Mar A Lago >
  
  I don't really get how the FBI has already searched three locations related to Biden but only one to Trump. Cooperation or not, the Trump investigation has been running longer and there's no news of the FBI asking to search Trump's NJ home, even after Trump's lawyers have searched it. >
  
  That's the difference between compliance and non-compliance, and why Trump is likely under threat of felony obstruction and broader criminal intent and Biden likely isn't.
  The DOJ is probing the possibility of documents at Trump's NJ and NY homes, but they need the legal foundation to obtain a search warrant.
  Without compliance, obtaining a search warrant requires showing a judge in that residence's jurisdiction concrete evidence of probable cause that crimes are being committed. Inference usually isn't enough ("Well, he did it at X, so he probably did it at Y.")
  When the DOJ obtained a search warrant for Mar-A-Lago, they cited 3 felonies and had an informant or other evidence of some sort that documents were still there. >
  
  That does put things more into perspective, but it still doesn't change that to my knowledge there aren't any reports of them asking to do a search of Trump's other properties, even after documents have been found in NJ, IIRC. While the FBI found documents worth retrieving for whatever records reasons in this case, there didn't seem to be any indication or reason for them to search here otherwise based on past statements by Biden's counsel. >
  
  If they asked it wouldn't be public and I doubt they'd even bother asking given the legal posture of the Trump team.
  Biden's counsel knows that there isn't a crime for having the documents, its' the willful retention that's the problem.  Allowing or even encouraging an FBI search is a pretty clear way to demonstrate that you're not willfully trying to keep any documents that may be found... even if, ultimately, none were. >
  
  Generally the investigators wouldn't ask unless they had good evidence anyway because they don't want to come across to the judge like they're fishing and don't have a good foundation for the search. It can get a future search request dismissed out of hand due to past ones being flimsy. >
  
  Something's wrong here, he's not on Twitter screaming WITCH HUNT and interfering with the DOJ investigation. The old fool doesn't know how this game is played! /s >
  
  Weird not having a complete sociopath and moron in the WH. >
  
  Please guys, get your friends, Republican and Democratics alike to be very vocal about not letting Trump back in.  The guy is the worst thing that has happened to the USA in decades. >
  
  Yay, we found a property owned by a former leader that isn’t violating basic security protocols. /s
  I’m glad the DOJ is following up on this. This should become a standard practice for all cleared officials who ever had classified documents in their personal possession. People should be held accountable if they negligently or deliberately don’t comply. >
  
  Held accountable? Nothing will happen to any of them. >
  
  Remember when politicians only had one house? >
  
  This has never happened in the history of this country. An FBI raid of a standing president is an obvious attack by the deep state. They are afraid of the truth getting out. They’re trying to silence the truth. /s >
  
  The news:
  "There is no news" >
  
  And that is good news. >
  
  with gary.. gnu >
  
  If there were documents found: "I Knew it!"
  If there are no documents found: "FBI is covering for him!"
  Just like the election they totally won because "no one wears Biden hats." >
  
  Actually incredible that this has become news now >
  
  What made this happen? I've missed something it seems. >
  
  Republicans gon want to investigate the FBI for not finding properly. >
  
  Meanwhile, the morning news I was listening to had the teaser: "The FBI searched President Biden's beach house stay tuned to hear what they seized!"
  Then, during the actual segment, they said that the FBI didn't find any classified material, but took a few handwritten notes for further review. They even noted that Biden was cooperating in a manner to cast doubt on it. "The Biden administration said that they've been cooperating." They didn't state it as a fact, but as a claim that Biden made - and claims might not be true.
  They were trying to play it up as if the beach house search found something juicy when it really came up empty. And this wasn't even FOX. I can only imagine what FOX reported. >
  
  This would be great news for Trump and his apologists but he’s in some much trouble he doesn’t have time to celebrate. >
  
  gop will still claim its false and the fbi working for the corrupt libs >
  
  Sounds like all these guys carry classified documents out. The real problem that needs to be addressed is how these documents are being allowed to by- path security measures. >
  
  Wait for the Faux Entertainment spin… >
  
  "Republicans launch investigation into failure to find classified documents at Biden's beach house" - soon >
  
  Republicans to call for the head of the FBI to resign over failure to find documents- also soon >
  
  They did find a speedo >
  
  That’s even more concerning >
  
  The GOP got their "raid" and nothing was found, will this shut them up? That is a rhetorical question. >
  
  No, but it will convince their minions that the FBI is corrupt and part of the Deep State thing or whatever. Reality has no power over those that refuse to believe in it. >
  
  The director of the FBI is Christopher Wray, who was appointed by Trump in 2017. Bush Jr also appointed the dude to be the assistant AG or whatever back in 2003. Stop hitting yourself...stop hitting yourself...stop hitting yourself... >
  
  Considering you’re not SUPPOSED to have classified documents at your beach house, good job. Lol. >
  
  One in a row. High five everyone! >
  
  How sad is it that NOT finding anything is news... >
  
  You won’t see that on Faux. 
  Just more sensationalism when he is in fact cooperating to the fullest. >
  
  Yes but did you find sand? Because no sand at a beach house is suspicious! >
  
  Comb the beach? *insert spaceballs gif >
  
  I’m more upset that I don’t also own a beach house than anything else. >
  
  So...why is it news when they didn't find any classified docs at his beach house? >
  
  I saying it here; Trump took those nuclear secrets as a dead man’s switch when they eventually implicate him on his broad crimes. >
  
  Great, now dig up Trump's ex wife coffin and search it. Bet there's shit in there 100% >
  
  "But did they find Hillary's emails? Did they? Maybe. I'm just saying" ‐ Donald Trump >
  
  Trump can't get enough of Hilary's emails. It's his platform. >
  
  With President Bidens consent and at his suggestion they search all his properties yet have nit searched all Trumps properties, despite kbowing he has more Secret Documents he STOLE somewhere >
  
  “Where’s the raid on Biden’s house?!??”
  #1 there were no dodged subpoenas, so no raid was necessary. This whole document thing with Biden happened because he volunteered the information. 
  #2 his house got searched, nothing turned up
  Now what do Republicans want? >
  
  Cool. Good they checked anyways. As they should. >
  
  Fox News: “He obviously moved/shredded them!” >
  
  No do Trump’s other places…and Mar a Lago again… >
  
  Here come the "FBI has terrorist democratic plants, of course they'd find no evidence" qanon conspiracy theories. >
  
  That not finding confidential documents in the beach house of the acting president is worth a headline tells you a lot >
  
  How many more houses does he have left for us to search? >
  
  Cue goalpost shifting by chuds. >
  
  You really typed that >
  
  I mean, they DID take handwritten notes, according to MPR. Just because those notes weren't classified doesn't mean they didn't contain classified material. But hey, benefit of the doubt for sure. I'm all for holding past, preset, and potential future Presidents accountable. >
  
  See how that works Trump? He didn’t bring classified materials to his beach home. And he currently has legal access to them. >
  
  MAGA conspiracy in shambles? Nope, more doublin down coming right up yeehaw >
  
  What’s the conspiracy? >
  
  At this point we better check Bill, W., and Barack as well just to be safe. >
  
  Carter is still kicking too. Would be great optics to bust into his home Christmas Vacation style. >
  
  He could have hid them in any of the hundreds of homes he’s built over the decades! >
  
  Woohoo what a good President! Damn the bar is so low. >
  
  News - sitting president not guilty of something. >
  
  Luckily I'm not surprised about this one >
  
  I wonder how many houses the living presidents own. >
  
  You mean he didn’t have top secret documents haphazardly strewn among magazines and Big Mac wrappers? >
  
  Oh wow the bare minimum has been achieved
  The amount of class docs being found is absolutely ridiculous and would carry prison sentences if they weren’t politicians >
  
  This in the equivalent of your sibling getting in trouble for having a messy room and then MONTHS LATER your parents checking yours and giving you a pat on the back for yours being clean.
  Because you know….YOU HAD MONTHS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
  I hate trump as much as the next guy here, but I’m not sure why this is being celebrated? >
  
  If having an untidy room was a national security risk then you really shouldn't have an untidy room >
  
  There's a difference between having a memo or two stuck in the jacket pocket and cases of highly sensitive confidential information >
  
  Oh thank god. For a second there I thought the GOP might gain the moral high ground for a minute or two. >
  
  Biden should ignore requests from the Archives, challenge DOJ subpoenas, and claim that he used telepathic powers to declassify documents like Trump did.  Biden obviously doesn’t know how to act Presidential, as defined by MAGA. . >
  
  How many damn houses does he have