comment: >
  
  Those M&M's with their extremely strong hands and powerful thighs. Their perfectly sculptured hour glass figures. Why are we giving them shoes when they should be wearing assless chaps. God gave them these assets why cant they flaunt them? Why don't we have white M&M's? Im just asking the questions here and I know the American public deserves to know. Wait no one else is thinking about these M&M's and how sexually charged they make me? They really get you riled up right? Wait they don't? Why have the liberals taken away a man's sexuality? Why are men not allowed to have these primal urges for the confectionary treats covered in chocolate and sometimes with nuts inside? Again, im just asking the questions.
context: "A source familiar with the matter said no warrant was involved and the search was consensual.
  
  Earlier Wednesday, Bauer said in a statement that the Department of Justice was conducting the search with Biden's full support and cooperation."
  So,  in other words,  this is nothing like Donald Trumps obstruction and lying to NARA,  the FBI,  the DOJ,  and having to get a subpoena ...
  I hate to shoot down a false equivalence,  but hey,  the morons on some channels just keep wanting to equate the two completely different scenarios... >
  
  I might be way behind on this but they did find classified documents in other places didn’t they? >
  
  Maybe, there were no documents requested by the National Archives and no one subpoenaed Biden for these. An attorney or staffer came across documents marked classified and Biden’s team voluntarily reported them, which isn’t all that uncommon for former administrations. It is possible these are documents that were previously declassified and that’s why the National Archives wasn’t looking for them but the only way to verify that is to go through everything and turn it in for review, which is the process they are going through. 
  The other option is of course to deny they exist, pretend you declassified them, and get charged with obstruction. >
  
  You realize NARA doesn't track every classified document.  Probably not even 1%.  If they are marked they probability is they are classified. >
  
  Did you really just skim my comment looking for the word “archives” and reply with this? 
  The context of what I said is important. I did not say NARA tracks everything, just that this incident wasn’t preceded by a request from NARA or a subpoena from the Justice Department. It was found by Biden’s team and voluntarily submitted for review while also opening up various locations to look for anything else marked classified. Those documents would still be marked classified even if they were declassified at some point but only the agencies responsible can say for sure what the status is. Either way I appreciate the thorough and open search to try to secure potentially classified information. >
  
  
  Did you really just skim my comment looking for the word “archives” and reply with this?
  
  You mention them twice when they arent likely a significant factor in the likelihood these are classified.  
  Id gamble they arent declassified, though best likely case they were overclassified.  But yes, this is how the process should go. >
  
  And yet media drooled all over themselves all morning breathlessly reporting on it.  Media needs to get back to real journalism. This crap is embarrassing. >
  
  the constant stream of ridiculous horse shit during trump's tenure got them hooked on the clicks and views. they're desperate to drum up drama to get that hit again 
  "Do not, my friends, become addicted to ~~water~~ political incompetence. It will take hold of you, and you will resent its absence!"
  -George Washington, 1684 >
  
  "V8! V8! V8!"
  -Thomas Jefferson. >
  
  "Mediocre!" 
  -James Madison >
  
  As expected >
  
  "That's because a gay M&M took them to Hunter Biden first!" - Tucker Carlson, probably.