comment: >
  
  No one’s going to send troops to join Ukraine (against Russia). Ukraine has the manpower, they just need the firepower.
context: Guess that means russia is fine with other countries sending their soldiers to Ukraine. Good to know. >
  
  If some North Koreans do end up in parts of Donbas - this is not set in stone that it will happen even if dailyNK heard something in Russia - it's more likely doing construction not doing policing or serve as soldiers even if they do come from some military trading companies. >
  
  Send all your soldiers! Then their army will be shown that it takes more to fight than a rehearsed goosestep! >
  
  So north Korea is "unofficially" officially joining the war. Good. Time for South Korea to up the pressure, maybe make moves to ridding themselves of a constant pest >
  
  Well, that's the thing. Thus far, the only 'official' countries involved in the war are Ukraine and Russia.
  If ANY country (Belarus, North Korea, Hungary, China, Iran) etc sends troops in as support for Russia, that opens the door wide for other countries to do the same on Ukraine's side.
  Russia is barely holding its own against Ukraine, and that's only because they are throwing bodies into the meat grinder to soak up enemy fire. They have exactly zero chance of victory if NATO actually puts boots on the ground.
  Suddenly, Russia is facing coordinated and massive airstrikes, multiple fronts to defend, and their paltry excuses for 'allies' will not be nearly enough to compensate (especially because it's damn clear that China, despite me listing them in the group above, will NOT get involved).
  Russia literally cannot afford to have any other nation get involved in this conflict. It is a guaranteed defeat if that happens. They have no choice but to remain the only aggressor nation.