comment: >
  
  what? they are not doing it for money, they are doing it for political reasons.
context: Iran has long denied arming the Houthis
  
  Free legitimate salvage then, thx. >
  
  The guy who laid the line directly under the yellow crates wins. (Pic in the full article) >
  
  Donate them to Ukraine, s’il-vous-plait. >
  
  Why?  Interference in Yemen is centered around keeping Western and Saudi Arabian influence over their country leading to the worst humanitarian disaster in modern history.
  Why is France getting involved in what should be a domestic conflict, seizing weapons shipments to the Houthi rebels?
  Edit:  I guess Ukrainians deserve freedom more?  So its fine that 10s of million are starving, that the UN removed human rights monitoring and civilian casualties have doubled in their absence, and 100s of thousands are already dead, as long as the U.S. is profiting off of it everything can be swept under the rug. >
  
  When one country arms another I think you can stop calling it domestic.
  If anything, actually, seizing this would keep it more domestic by limiting outside influence. Iran is denying these are theirs and Ukraine could use the weapons so sounds like donating it is a perfect solution. >
  
  
  When one country arms another I think you can stop calling it domestic.
  
  No, international trade is relied on by most to all industrialized countries. >
  
  it isn;t trade, it is a proxy war >
  
  So then everything is a proxy war.  We will have to rewrite history now, someone inform the historians.