comment: >
  
  Call me cynical but this Santos guy isn’t going anywhere. He’s goofy and ridiculous which makes him the perfect lightning rod to steer all the media attention away from whatever insidious bullshit the GOP is cooking up legislation-wise. I bet McCarthy loves this guy
context: Hey everybody, it's ok now. He's apologized. Like, more than once. He's really sorry for all the lying, and promises not to do that anymore. Plus, he only lied because he thought no one would respect him. So, that's fixed, ok? Ok? >
  
  I kinda hope Jimmy Kimmel can convince him to do a claw machine interview about this. I need about 800 more of those. >
  
  “I learned my lesson,” lied the liar. >
  
  Seriously, the projection from this guy calling someone else a pathological liar 🤥 >
  
  The source is fox news. They've all been lying their asses off and have all been caught in lies multiple times. It seems to me that they realize having an openly gay republican looks bad to their homophobic voters so they're all turning on him now. He put himself in this position. I still don't understand how the fuck he was allowed to be elected in the first place when his whole resume was known to be bullshit from the beginning. As for his suspicious campaign funds, it should be pretty interesting to finally figure out what that's all about now that he can't expect the republican party to cover for him. Dude scammed a homeless veterans dying dog. He made his bed and now he's gotta sleep in it. >
  
  As long as he is in congress the Republican party is the party of Santos. I don't see how anyone can trust Republicans while they continue to allow Santos to hold a seat. >
  
  Madison Cawthorn wheeled out anti-LGBTQ rhetoric during his campaign and while in office. Then, we find out that Cawthorn was sodomizing his male cousin the whole time.
  The pre-Santos Republican Party was not the paragon of consistency and truth you think it was. >
  
  Republicans are fine with liars. >
  
  Just as long as it gives them an edge. >
  
  Fascists projecting. That’s pretty much all they can do >
  
  . "And I’ve learned my lesson. And I can guarantee you that from now on, anything and everything is always going to be above board. It’s largely already been above board. I’m just going to go the extra step to double-check, cross-reference everything."
  My favorite bit from the interview. I'm going to double-check facts from my life. Shouldn't he know about his life without having to double-check where he went to college or worked? >
  
  It's also interesting that he didn't say what he lied about specifically. Just that he lied about something.