comment: >
  
  Yes. Especially with it originating through a non-emergency channel.
  This was basically a guaranteed safe kill. Like a 'wellness check', police have just been told there's no danger if they go in, "but here's a justification for going anyway you guys have fun!"
context: Frasure was shot at least once in the head. He was transported to University of Cincinnati Medical Center, where he died.
  
  Apprehending a suspect for burglary and/or fleeing should not be done so with deadly force. This is what happens when police get away with murder. >
  
  They're already trying to frame it as him putting the officers in mortal danger by driving his truck at them.
  
  
  Guy is spending time off work to empty the apartment of a dead relative.
  
  
  Neighbour calls police, claiming robbery in progress.
  
  
  Police arrive.
  
  
  *TIME PASSES*
  
  
  Guy tries to flee from danger.
  
  
  Police try to kill him.
  
  
  
  Apparently, he was known to them.
  However, this alone doesn't justify a shooting, nor does simply fleeing.
  Still need the camera footage to clarify the manner of his driving as the police describe it. >
  
  Police succeed in killing him >
  
  Police claim that they feared for their lives in situation that they created. >
  
  This is almost always the case >
  
  If only there were methods of deescalation
  And methods of training them to people
  Idk, maybe like cops? >
  
  That's not what we're looking for in our force >
  
  "I'm sorry, but you've failed the psychiatric evaluation, please find another career." >
  
  It's getting to the point where if there's police in the area at all, you should assume there's a credible threat to your life regardless of circumstances. >
  
  I felt that way over 10 years ago in southwest florida >
  
  “The call was placed to a non-emergency line but rerouted to general dispatch” so like, no matter what they respond like a fucking swat team.