comment: >
context: While I agree pockets should be in all pants and most shorts, where are you going in pajamas with your keys and wallet?! >
  
  Come to the UK. Tons of people take their kids to school or pop to the shops in pyjamas. >
  
  Interesting! I go to stores in sweatpants or joggers, but never pajamas. >
  
  And there it is, folks.
  Your daily [insert something so minor that no one cares about] should be ILLEGAL. >
  
  This is all I, as a woman, care about when I get dressed in the morning. This is such a massieve struggle. >
  
  You know... You could buy pants and pyjamas with pockets and avoid the problem altogether. >
  
  yes because you believe the government should care about what you wear. lol   
  I think you mean "boycott all pocketless pants so they stop making them" ,  still kinda dumb but not super stupid as above. lol >
  
  I assume (best guess) that the some garment are made with the assumption that you won't be leaving your house with them. >
  
  Just because pants without pockets are made doesn't mean you have to buy pants without pockets. 
  This is an unpopular opinion but I'm not upvoting it because it's another "easily avoidable thing I don't like should be banned" post. Low effort and doesn't generate interesting discussion. It's dumb. >
  
  
  At minimum I have my wallet and keys with me
  
  Why do you have those in your pjs? >
  
  I don't ever wear pants, but I prefer my shorts and skirts to not have any pockets as those make them look more bulky. I do think it's slightly inconvenient, but I just carry around a bag to put my stuff in then. Why just not let both exist and everyone can choose for themselves...? >
  
  Yes I hate it when I get in my car, and my car keys aren't in my pyjamas. Totally annoying. >
  
  I use a bag or my bra >
  
  Agree that they’re superior, disagree that they should be illegal. >
  
  Straight to jail. >
  
  Just use regular pants