comment: >
  
  
  How can the dude the place is named for not recuse?
  
  I don't think he has to, an antagonistic name isn't like a get out of supreme court free card.
  Like if Florida made a "Sotomayor book ban" that she had nothing to do with, would you expect her to recuse herself and let the other justices continue their agenda?
  I completely support the satanic temple's work and cheekiness here, but I don't think a cute loophole in having the whole supreme court interpret the constitution is going to work out well for anyone.
  Besides, I'm not sure I see a supreme-court worthy case here. They're following state abortion law which is what the supreme court just ruled.
context: “ The clinic will serve anyone 17 years or older in New Mexico at the time of the visit, and patients must be no more than 11 weeks pregnant, according to the website.
  Services include financial assistance, emotional support, chemical abortions and religious support, as well as contraceptives.”
  Not too shabby. >
  
  This is also genius. When they get into the inevitably lawsuits - and I'll make a considerable donation to boost this - it could conceivably go to SCOTUS.
  How can the dude the place is named for not recuse?