comment: >
context: Her wildly controversial and radical opinions have tarnished the Daily Wire’s more analytical reputation around news reporting (via Ben Shapiro, Michael Knowles, Matt Walsh etc).
  
  I would suppose it depends on who you ask.  If you ask TYT they will tell you that every one of these people listed is more or less a clown.  That said I don't personally have opinions regarding these people. >
  
  Sorry what is TYT? >
  
  The Young Turks, never watched them. Still think everyone at Daily Wire is a clown. >
  
  Yah I have no idea who those people are. If they have a significant liberal bias it doesn’t really make this a compelling argument, because I bet DW probably thinks they are clowns too. >
  
  
  Her wildly controversial and radical opinions have tarnished the Daily Wire’s more analytical reputation around news reporting (via Ben Shapiro, Michael Knowles, Matt Walsh etc).
  
  Well, yikes. I'm not sure anyone held these people in high opinion for their analytical prowess in the first place. They are not respected by mainstream journalists, by academics, or really by anyone noteworthy. They are known for polemics (rhetoric), not journalism or philosophy.
  Candace Owens serves an important function for the Daily Wire. She exists to boost their credibility for the reasons you already outlined. 
  As much as you might be personally offended by her antisemitic views (or that you think others are offended), I don't think that's a deal breaker for much of the Daily Wire audience, who are already receptive to these kinds of regressive views about identity, race, and conspiracy.