comment: >
  
  Fascism and Socialism have always been at odds.
context: What a frigging waste of space and time these idiots have become. >
  
  It's no wonder almost three-quarters of people think the GQP isn't paying attention to important issues: they're too caught up with empty resolutions, gas stoves, banning books, and whining about drag queens and the LGBTQ community.
  They're a disgrace to the nation. >
  
  Well, that’s because that’s exactly what the people who vote for these POS want. >
  
  Wordism is killing it right now. >
  
  It started when we gave complete lunatics a megaphone in the name of being 'fair and balanced'. They spew blatant bullshit and everyone stands around stroking their chins trying to look all solomonic going "hmmm, this craziness they're pulling out of their asses is equal in weight to the truth staring us in the face and should be taken seriously."
  A hundred years ago, we would have run these psychotic carpetbaggers out of town on a rail. Look it up, I think we should bring the practice back. >
  
  Its weird to me to be like "Lol dumb republicans!" when most Democratic house members also voted for this stupid bill. >
  
  If it wasn't for socialism, every single retired person in the United States wouldn't be getting a social security check. Oh, and they wouldn't be getting Medicaid or Medicare either. And the other 100 things. >
  
  How bout we include no Facisism as well. That's even more evil than Socialism. Famine, murders et all. >
  
  Let’s codify into law a measure to ban communion wafers served by pedophile priests. >
  
  So they want to give up lifetime health care that comes with the job? >
  
  Absolutely not. They are exempt from changes, grandfathered in as it were. >
  
  apparently these morons don't understand how getting the potholes in front of your house fixed works. >
  
  It's not a waste of time, it allows the GOP to condemn ANY social program, like Medicare, Social Security, SNAP, etc. I mean hell, they've only spent my more than 40 years trying to equate socialism with any social program. >
  
  Not only is it a waste of time, it injustly attacks an ideology that has the potential to help by hitting it with a broad stroke.
  Non-authoritarian socialist ideologies exist, guys. >
  
  Conservatives can only think in black-and-white. Nuance doesn’t exist in their vocabulary. >
  
  I feel like this was just to set up stupid attack ads for the next election. >
  
  I thought free healthcare was Socialism?
  They never wasted any time condemning that.
  Listening to them trying to justify their bullshit through their mental gymnastics exhausts me. >
  
  Isn't voting to condemn socialism a vote to condemn their jobs?  We pay them to represent us via tax dollars.  They get paid via socialism.  (Although we really know where they make their real money.) >
  
  Don't forget that 100 Dems joined them >
  
  100+ Democrats in the house voted for this nonsense bill. What the shit. >
  
  I've paid my social security just like the rest of the US. I don't deserve to get that shit stolen. Plays, I enjoy paved roads and the benefits of emergency services. I don't think those should leave, they're a part of it. >
  
  Over 100 Democrats voted in favor of this.
  "Socialism bad" is a winning line for many many American politicos. >
  
  I don’t know it might get some bigot with a big truck to buy a bumper sticker about killing socialists.