comment: >
  
  Hmm, time for a conglomerate to buy in and offer that service.  You could pay a fixed amount per month and be able to view shows on HBO, Nickelodeon...wait a minute, we tried this!  This is just cable!
context: Sounds overly complicated, which means it will probably cause more problems than solve.
  It's so much simpler to just charge what they want to actually charge for number of devices playing at the same time and then not worry about account sharing. >
  
  That’s why I pay for the most streams. I’m divorced, one kid is away at college the other lives with her mom. 
  This is going to piss me off if I get charged for my kids using my account. >
  
  Between everyone sharing my family's account, we might watch something once a month. There's nothing good on there anymore and I'm sick of things I love being cancelled. If it costs more we'll probably just cancel. >
  
  People seem to say this all the time but I thought last earnings report they gained back most if not all the people they lost the previous quarter. I'm betting they have an idea of how many people will go when they change these things and the likelihood those same people sign up when say the next season of Stranger Things drops. >
  
  Quite a few people already started with rotating services. My coworkers subs for 3 month to netflix then cancels, 3 months crave,3month paramount, and 3 month dysney. He also have prime, but he has it mostly for deliveries since he buys shit tons of stuff fot work.