comment: >
  
  Then you should complain about all lobbyists
context: the GOP should worry about Santos and Gaetz, to start >
  
  Santos was awarded two committee assignments.    
  Sure, he stepped down.. but the fact that a known lying Freshman Republican got a spot over others just shows they have absolutely nobody of good character or integrity elected to the House this cycle. >
  
  Not to mention two purple hearts >
  
  And a Nobel Prize for Mathematics >
  
  And the "Most Truthful Guy Ever" award. >
  
  Has he been awarded the Congressional Medal Of Fucking Over Voters because he took the cake and should be a star on pornhub. >
  
  AOC: "This is about targeting women of color"
  GOP: "And?" >
  
  I think that the people wearing swastikas with their Trump 2024 shirts are a bit more antisemitic that anything she said. >
  
  Or MTG “joking” that a Jewish tour group at the US Capitol was performing “reconnaissance.”  But nah, “all about the Benjamins” is where the GQP draws the line. >
  
  I assume this is simply something McCarthy was forced to concede in the three-page secret document that allowed him to become Speaker. Some racist demanded this concession and McCarthy didn’t oppose it. 
  At some point, the three pages of concessions will be exhausted, and then McCarthy’s usefulness will cease to exist.
  EDIT: McCarthy had to make additional concessions recently to get enough Republican voters to pass this. 😂 >
  
  MTG is speaker in all but name. >
  
  The hand behind the puppet. >
  
  The party at AIPAC is gonna be wild! >
  
  A woman of color AND a muslim AND a democrat - checks almost all the white supremacist fundie boxes >
  
  But don't worry the GOP has a Muslim woman of color in the House, so they can't be racist. Her name, in case you were wondering, is George Santos. >
  
  Oh, I met her once! Super nice lady, told me if I gave her all my money she'd exchange it for Iraqi dinars, and you know how they're about to explode in value. >
  
  Ilhan Omar didn't even make any kind of antisemitic statements.  She criticized Isreael the government, not the Jewish people. >
  
  Truth is a defense against charges of slander. >
  
  Got it, so anti-Semitic and racist remarks are okay if they're "true"? >
  
  I'm saying if something is a fact it's not racist or antisemitic.
  Harvey Weinstein is Jewish. He's also a sexual predator. Calling him a sexual predator isn't racist or antisemitic. >
  
  That's because he is only one and not a group >
  
  Right but if it's a fact that a a group like AIPAC is influencing American political policy, it's not antisemitic or racist to state as such.