comment: >
  
  So what's this about?
context: Well, I can't fault the bravery of that ship captain, putting so much water under a Russian ship. >
  
  Well it’s far from Moscow windows and staircases now though. >
  
  Its only one missile away from the other Moscow though >
  
  or one "cigarette fire" away from brave new depths. >
  
  But closer to Montana. >
  
  I wonder if the XO wants to raise rabbits >
  
  And have two wives. >
  
  Oh at least two. >
  
  Sam Neill...pre-Jurrassic Park, IIRC...what a great movie (and better book) >
  
  Indeed it is! >
  
  Betting pool!
  Place your bets here!
  Which happens first:
  Catches fire
  Breaks down and has to be towed to port
  Defects to a NATO coutry
  Sinks without explanation >
  
  Can I add falls down a flight of stairs or has a heart attack? >
  
  Or more likely, towed away by Ukrainian fishing boat. >
  
  Sea tractor >
  
  That's called a tugboat. >
  
  Ukrainian Sea Tractor is the official name now. >
  
  I feel bad for the shipmen that have to row that thing. >
  
  All Tugs currently servicing Admiral Kuznetsov. >
  
  Both tugs >
  
  Give your boats a tug, shipfucker. >
  
  See you tomorrow when it sinks or burns >
  
  It might also lose an engagement against local fishermen because they think those are japanese torpedo boats >
  
  Greatest story in Russian Naval history! >
  
  The Wikipedia article contains the phrase “greater losses to both sides were prevented by ”. 
  When “greater losses to both sides” is used in a sentence where only one of those sides is armed you know you’re in for some clownshoes shit.