comment: >
context: I think they were all cast incredibly well and each played their part.  If you can make it through the Kenny Roger's Roasters episode without laughing, kudos to you.
  Kramer >
  
  Serenity now, the pimp, mail fraud, the lobster, blood, calzone... They're all great. >
  
  I agree 100%, there is no telling how many times I have seen every episode. >
  
  The statue, frogger, the breakup >
  
  Jumpy, yes.
  BUT also entrepreneurial, connected, out-side the box, extremely picky / extremely not picky, moocher, dives into trends head first. And my favorite; practically never intentionally rude (compared to the rest) >
  
  Yea I always liked the Kramer character because he was such a genuinely friendly person. He was weird and socially awkward but never a jerk and I always thought it was funny when he would put the other characters in awkward positions because they were being jerks and Kramer was so nice he couldn’t see it. >
  
  My friend Bob Sacamano begs to differ… >
  
  physical comedy is a style of comedy. michael richards is a great physical comedian. his gestures, his pratfalls. he is a clown. he is a loud mime. >
  
  That is the best way to put it. >
  
  You’re not wrong but all of them only had one joke.  Elaine and George had crazy tirades and schemes and nothing more, Jerry always just observed them and mocked the silliness.  They all only did one or two things but together they were all great.
  I would also argue that Kramer isn’t seen as the greatest performance ever,  he is just such an iconic part of the show. And that’s why he is so beloved. >
  
  Kramer was my favorite lol >
  
  F off lol. Just because I like the fictional character Kramer in a tv show doesn’t mean I stand for racism. >
  
  Nah he’s the best >
  
  If youre talking about over-rated, i gotta go with Steve Urkel, as a kid i was insulted about how stupid that was, n talk about one joke >
  
  This whole sentence is insulting to the English language >
  
  Always thought he was like a plastic bag in the wind that flew in funny and interesting ways--Eccentric, always trying new things and letting things happen to him, but he wasn't spiteful or bitter. >
  
  clearly you haven't watched enough seinfeld. kramer was the basis of half of the shows craziness. without kramer you miss out on some of the shows best episodes. >
  
  Seriously... too many episodes to count. >
  
  I don't think Kramer's thing is that he's "jumpy". I've never heard anyone praise the character for that or indicate that's why they like him or think he's good. >
  
  He was a one of a kind creation.  I've said before, I consider Michael Richards to be one of the most fortunate, 'lucky' actors of all time because he had this role.  He was great in Fridays, but realistically speaking, he's had zero successes outside of Fridays and Seinfeld.  
  And Seinfeld made him millions.
  Kramer was a once in a lifetime gig, and a great, unique, original character.  But George was definitely a more important character. >
  
  He was great in UHF, almost like a dumber proto-Kramer. But of course, no success really resulted from that. >
  
  Boo this man!
  Kramer the character is on par with any in the show.
  I'd say Jerry and Elaine are the weakest. >
  
  Here is an unpopular opinion for you. That whole show sucks >
  
  Everyone is entitled to an opinion, just for fun whats your favorite show? >
  
  I'll do you one better. All of Seinfeld sucks.
  Just super suckful show