comment: >
  
  Which raises the question why would the rich need to do that. Being poor or low income doesn’t mean you have the right to harass or steal from people who have more. If crime in the wealthier areas increases dramatically after this wall comes down then it just proves that the wall was needed.
context: I wonder if the more informal structures will start to spread once they take the wall down 
  Will have to find more photos. Looks interesting. >
  
  I'm fascinated to see how far people can push the edge of what's considered "acceptable", especially since they are literally living in squalor, it's hardly fair. They can achieve more of a balance but, corruption. >
  
  "It's a discriminatory wall... It can't be that we divide by social classes. That is unacceptable, it is no longer happening anywhere in the world," the judge said.
  Idk what world this judge lives in? >
  
  pack it up boys we fixed wealth inequality >
  
  Peru is far beyond fixing >
  
  We call them gated communities in the USA >
  
  This isn't even close to a gated community. >
  
  Yeah, it is about 4,000 miles away. >
  
  It'll be interesting to see how this plays out long-term. The same people who wanted that wall in the first place aren't going to just want to interact with all of those poor folks in the other neighborhood all of a sudden just because the wall is gone. But the response could be in a lot of different ways and I'll be interested in seeing what becomes the most popular. >
  
  
  The same people who wanted that wall in the first place aren't going to just want to interact with all of those poor folks in the other neighborhood all of a sudden just because the wall is gone.
  
  The point is, society shouldn't be divided just because some rich assholes want it that way. Who gives af what they want, tear that wall down and make them see how they force people to live. >
  
  I don't care if the wall-supporters get hurt feelings, but I care a lot how they choose to respond to the changed situation. If the wall gets replaced with a bunch of hired armed guards, for example, I wouldn't really consider than an improvement. Or if they use their clout to get the local government to increase police activity in the area to harass any poor-looking person in the "wrong" area. Stuff like that. >
  
  The rich will simply fortify their properties and drive armored cars, either that or move somewhere else