comment: >
  
  Oh no!
  So?
context: It should be Bandit Heeler >
  
  Somewhere on the internet is a 5 dollar buck note drawn in Bluey style with a King Charles Spaniel on it for the king. >
  
  There is now... 5 Dollar Bucks >
  
  lol he looks so sad >
  
  His mum died. >
  
  oh yeah that’s right >
  
  This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 89%. (I'm a bot)
  
  
  King Charles will not feature on Australia's $5 banknote following a decision by the Reserve Bank of Australia, prompting outrage from the Opposition.
  The portrait of Queen Elizabeth II first appeared on the $5 polymer note in July 1992 when the Queen celebrated the 40th anniversary of her accession.
  "This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II."The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.
  
  
  Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: banknote^#1 decision^#2 note^#3 Queen^#4 Australia^#5 >
  
  Good bota >
  
  
  There is no question about this, that it's directed by the government," he told Sydney radio station 2GB. 
  
  Maybe you folks do things differently down in Australia, but who the hell else would decide what gets printed on money? >
  
  The Reserve Bank of Australia is independent of the government. They're the ones who decide on the notes. They'll consult the government, but the decision lies with them
  Basically, there's going to be an indigenous person on the note rather than an irrelevant monarch from the other side of the world and a whole lot of racists are going to be bent out of shape
  Ironically, the Liberal party in Australia are conservatives. Not a patch on the fucked-up shitty mess like in 'Murica, but still a bunch of bigots stuck in the dark ages >
  
  Like it or not, that 'irrelevant monarch' is still our head of state. >
  
  In name only. >
  
  That's still an important distinction. Everything with "royal" in its name would have to change in a republic.