comment: >
  
  People use 'landlords' as a catch all and they aren't all equal.
  It's not neccessarily fair bashing some couple who bought a rental property as a retirement investment. It is fair to bash huge landlords who have a load of properties, they have an active interest in keeping the rental market as fucked as it is. 
  But yeah, as with most things, it's a far more complex issue than it's made out to be on social media.
context: People use 'landlords' as a catch all and they aren't all equal.
  It's not neccessarily fair bashing some couple who bought a rental property as a retirement investment. It is fair to bash huge landlords who have a load of properties, they have an active interest in keeping the rental market as fucked as it is. 
  But yeah, as with most things, it's a far more complex issue than it's made out to be on social media. >
  
  As someone who has had multiple horrible LandLords that just refuse to do their jobs, some landlords deserve to be beat on. I mean the gov. is fucking shit up, but the landlord isn't always blamless, and some really make the situation much worse. That said tho, the good ones do get alot of underserved fingerpointing, so Im with you on this one. >
  
  Can we hate on both? Not from the UK, but rental situation in US is also pretty fucked. The government does little to nothing to protect tenants, large companies buy up properties and collude to artificially raise prices, individual landlords also hoard properties, and the individual laborer who creates things of true value gets stuck with bill. >
  
  Why are you defending landlords when their ancestors were actually lord's who literally took the land by force? Why do they deserve to be owners of that property when they did nothing to earn it? >
  
  Who pooped in your Cheerios? Holy hell you are a bitter biscuit