comment: >
  
  Good job abandoning your irrelevant tangent.
  Now, for the rest of the post that you didn't respond to:
  Do you acknowledge that the abstract concept of an average person has fuck all to do with your argument against women being in combat roles since we don't send the abstract concept of averages into combat?
context: I believe this statement because studies prove that men are physically stronger then women on average.
  
  We don't send the abstract concept of averages into combat. We send individuals. We set the bar where it should be set and then we accept any and all individuals who meet that standard. >
  
  Yes but that’s not the case if it was it would not have two different tests so why is there different tests and requirements for each gender >
  
  Your position is that women shouldn't be in combat. It isn't that there shouldn't be two different standards.
  I addressed your position and I ask that you stay on that topic. Do you acknowledge that the abstract concept of an average person has fuck all to do with your argument against women being in combat roles since we don't send the abstract concept of averages into combat? >
  
  Yes that is my position