comment: >
  
  Used for much more than abortions. Helped me shed my miscarriage (empty egg sack) after VASECTOMY... One of my friends almost died from a missed miscarriage, so I was glad to be able to take it. It was terrible, but at least  my husband was caring for our young children. Can't imagine having to have waited for it to happen "naturally".
context: How can one state judge take away access from the whole fn country? This shouldn't be possible. Can we please sell Texas to Mexico now? >
  
  They’re challenging the FDA approval of the drug. Without that, it’s not legal to sell in the US. >
  
  Can someone please explain how in the fuck that is legal? I am getting my PhD in sociology but I have worked for public health departments and I am working on analyzing big hospital databases and examining drug studies. I legitimately don’t understand how someone with out ANY medical understanding can challenge something as complicated as an FDA approval. I think there have been cases where the fda fucked up but it’s nothing like what is being suggested. >
  
  This is America where you can sue anybody for anything.  Reactionary Republican judges is why this approach is successful. >
  
  One judge should not be able to ban an FDA approved medication. >
  
  An FDA approved drug with a couple decades of good efficacy and safety data no less.