comment: >
context: Republicans do not respond to reason. They have to be forced. I don’t understand why just one Santos voter doesn’t sue for fraud. >
  
  Money >
  
  Santos is pretty much prof Conservatives will vote for anyone with an R on the ballot. >
  
  You mean vote at all costs regardless of their controversies >
  
  Yes >
  
  Thanks for the laugh 😂 >
  
  R's: We're already right about the Fourth and our trip to Russia. >
  
  That means John Thune Ron Jonhson and Kay Granger because they were part of the Moscow 8 >
  
  Oh yes, of course……..  not. >
  
  Forthrightly must be the safe word >
  
  Why would they? Actual question. >
  
  To distance themselves from someone who's obviously radioactive.
  He definitely lied to get elected, probably to the point of criminal fraud, and was publicly humiliated for it before he even took office. There's a reasonable chance he'll be impeached, a very good chance he'll be on the wrong end of criminal charges, and almost no chance of re-election; I'm sure the party is already planning to back a different candidate if he manages to stay afloat long enough for to run again.
  ETA: It could be in the best interests of republicans, especially in a blue state like NY, to support the investigation. The worst thing that happens is he survived it, they pissed off a junior congressman and have to put out some press release about how "justice prevailed", best case he gets humiliated and they have bipartisan popularity for doing nothing but standing back and looking like they're paying attention during a couple of hearings.