comment: >
  
  If you’re innocent, aren’t you supposed to challenge the facts of the investigation instead of firing the people investigating you?
context: They have to rein in their own extremist factions first. 
  Looking forward to (hopefully) another shitty day for McCarthy. >
  
  I could watch him personally lose forever. >
  
  Article title could read: "How to prove there is something to see without the time and expense of a investigation" >
  
  Of course. Today's Republicans have no ethics. >
  
  They never did, but now they're just more transparent about it. We've seen who they really are and you cant put the toothpaste back in the tube >
  
  I guess one way to rein it in is to just grind the house to a halt for the rest of forever while they squabble internally. >
  
  The 119th Congress will be elected in November 2024 and come into office in January 2025.
  A little over 700 days to go.
  So this won’t go on forever. >
  
  If 118 doesn't elect a speaker then do they actually count per se? Like we have 117, a two year break, and then 118 happens when we finally elect a majority that can come together to get a speaker to swear them all in.