comment: >
  
  It took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.
context: "Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists" >
  
  Technically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor. >
  
  Domestic vs international. >
  
  Yes.
  There are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map? >
  
  As an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever. >
  
  I just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?
  I have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people. >
  
  "Thanks for the eight bucks." He said. >
  
  Per month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time. >
  
  Nit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion. >
  
  The nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean. >
  
  He lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership. >
  
  That’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events.  Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss. >
  
  
  Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.
  
  You are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion. >
  
  Nobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.
  And even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.