comment: >
context: British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said Thursday that a 36-hour Russian ceasefire in Ukraine for Orthodox Christmas would "do nothing to advance the prospects for peace".
  "Russia must permanently withdraw its forces, relinquish its illegal control of Ukrainian territory and end its barbaric attacks against innocent civilians," he wrote on Twitter. >
  
  Oh look, it's time for "the news" again. What's it like, being a living marionette? >
  
  Not really sure what you're questioning here. James Cleverly certainly did post this tweet and Russia is definitely attempting to buy time/push propoganda in advocating a ceasefire.
  Don't know why I waste my time typing this, you're clearly another faceless lapdog for Putin. >
  
  
  you're clearly another faceless lapdog for Putin.
  
  Ah, the standard lib retort to anyone who questions official narratives. You're truly a credit to all the other servile golden-retrievers of your ilk. A pathetic automaton of flesh. >
  
  Again... The tweet exists. It is a fact.
  I've perused your comment history and this seems standard practice for you. Adopt a vehement opposition to western views then respond with some pompous and overtly pretentious comment.
  This is Reddit, nobody cares about your constantly recycled vocabulary.
  You even posted a similar comment 5 days ago regarding China's expansion in the south china sea. At least you're consistently unoriginal I guess. >
  
  Yes, that's correct. I picked up on the fact that u/hieronymusanonymous is a paid propagandist, and I've called them out on it. Of course, they can't acknowledge as much, but I'm sure they know what the score is. Why don't you go have a look at their post history and tell me if you think otherwise? >
  
  I can't say if they're paid or not, but they certainly post western news articles regularly. Probably a bot or karma farmer, and I suppose it could meet the definition of propoganda. Their comments are definitely pro-Ukraine.
  Regardless of being an automated news outlet or propagandist, it's down to the individual to read the article and consider the reputation of the source.
  In the weight of all evidence, support for Ukraine is clearly the just and right thing to do. >
  
  
  In the weight of all evidence, support for Ukraine is clearly the just and right thing to do.
  
  Only if you have the political insight and education of your standard American.   Leveling, I'd suggest you peruse the comments in this thread and maybe you'll gain some insight into the nature of the conflict in question.