comment: >
  
  Iiiiii Can't Stand It, I Know Ya Planned It
context: This was two days ago already and they say it was a rupture rather than sabotage. >
  
  They kind of have to; confirmed Russian sabotage of a pipeline between two NATO nations, on NATO soil, would more or less necessitate WWIII. >
  
  Attack while they are weak. 
  We would be in moscow by friday. >
  
  Well we actually wouldn't since a nuke would probably fly in that case.
  But they'd have no more soldiers in Ukraine, and no more nautical assets.....anywhere. >
  
  Built in 1978, had undergone recent maintenance, and consisted of two parallel systems but only one was damaged. This was definitely not sabotage.