comment: >
  
  Hypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.
context: okie doke thanks for the heads-up. >
  
  I'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year. >
  
  No hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.
  Hypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech. >
  
  Hypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..
  Lastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses >
  
  B2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets. >
  
  Hmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand... >
  
  Putin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future. >
  
  Hypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a "hypersonic cruise missile" total b/s >
  
  Under valued reply.  Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles. >
  
  Which is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke. >
  
  Putin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? 
  It's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over. >
  
  Putin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.
  He's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation. >
  
  Didn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas? >
  
  That was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea. >
  
  Nothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen! >
  
  Unfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s >
  
  10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em >
  
  Probably not even pointy >
  
  Now I am certain you were watching a cartoon… >
  
  Couldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic >
  
  Zircon encrusted tweezers! >
  
  Spoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon. >
  
  Lol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see. >
  
  give me one ping >
  
  Such a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. 
  Let them sing. >
  
  Appear strong when you are weak. He fucked. >
  
  Go ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us. >
  
  Desperate Putin can suck it >
  
  Is this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously >
  
  Pff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia >
  
  In tomorrow's news: "Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire" >
  
  Correction: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down ) >
  
  On a frigate which is one of the smallest warship.  Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship.  All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth. >
  
  Their flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world. >
  
  If he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?