comment: >
  
  The guy recently said he a conversation with Helmut Schmidt and Francois Mitterand about January 6th at the G7 meeting in 2021, both of whom had been dead for 6 and 15 years respectively.
  He can just say they took it and everyone will go along with the story.
  Source 1
  Source 2
context: Dammit, is there a Classified Document fairy leaving them randomly strewn about? >
  
  It's paper. How often have you accidently shuffled something important into a pile you didnt mean to? He was the VP at the time. Nothing has been found in any non-work area. I'd bet this happens every 4 yrs but it's making news cycles now because it's being looked for to be an issue.  I'm not saying if documents were mishandled out of the ordinary there shouldn't be repercussions. I'm just saying we elect humans. >
  
  As part of my job, I have to carry somewhat sensitive paper documents from location to location. If I left them somewhere, I’d be fired instantly and possibly sued. Why lower expectations for government officials? >
  
  Ehhh, stating that your company has a better way to handle sensitive documents than the government isn't the brag you may think it is. Government isn't the playground of the smart. It's the playground of the rich and nepotism. >
  
  I mean. Investigate it obviously. We're not a cult. If he did something wrong, charge him. >
  
  Well since he's president, impeachment and removal would be the remedy here not charges, but agreed. If he did wrong he deserves the consequences. >
  
  He wasn't president at the time. He was VP. He can absolutely get charged legally. They would, however, defer the charges until he was out of office as they always do. >
  
  I wasnt implying he couldn't face charges after he's out of office, that is always an option. But at this point since he is president, the only course of action is impeachment, that was more my point >
  
  There's no actual law that says that. It's been a policy of the DOJ not to indict a sitting president, but there's no law preventing it. >
  
  The oddest thing about this is that no one else found this stuff until now.  I would have thought that you would have a sweep for such things, rather than relying on one person to comply.  (Common sense ain't...) >
  
  
  The oddest thing about this is that no one else found this stuff until now
  
  The real issue here is why the fuck doesn't the national archives know where its documents are >
  
  ..11 million documents are a lot to keep track of >
  
  Plus they were extra busy taping together the documents Trump routinely tore up during his tenure. >
  
  I say it should definitely be investigated and if charges are warranted then they should be put on record and levied. 
  Just remember that the Orange guy is first in line and Didn’t cooperate and obstructed actively. >
  
  Thank you >
  
  Aides are doing their work, and as usual this is not going to be a problem because he didn’t do anything wrong. >
  
  Blame the help. Stellar leadership >
  
  ? "blame"? I thought this was praise. >
  
  The difference between this case and Trump is that Biden is fully cooperating to give back any classified documents.