comment: >
  
  Not yet
context: I wonder if they’re looking at this from an obstruction/witness tampering lens? >
  
  They ought to be looking at it through a criminal organization lens. >
  
  Is Florida and Washington, DC interstate commerce even though DC isn’t technically a state yet? >
  
  I'd like to see how they'd argue that the states between Florida and DC don't exist. >
  
  If we hadn’t botched reconstruction there wouldn’t be. >
  
  I'd like to see an in depth investigation into the entire network of money collecting and distributing that seems to seamlessly comingle the politicians with their propaganda networks where they then all spout the exact same narrative of the day and who knows what other type of proverbial back scratching. 
  I recently looked into details on federally mandated campaign fund expense reports and there was a stark difference between what Democrats spend their money on and Republicans, notably the most obnoxious and visible ones we all seem to not be able to avoid hearing about, so the biggest earners.
  Democrats would have normal expenses you would expect and you walk away with a sense that these are all normal and above board. Republicans, on the other hand, mostly, (Jim Jordan was oddly similar to the spending of Democrats, I'm assuming because of presidential aspirations), had all of these weird pigeon holes that ate up enormous sums of money. Stuff like this one tiny company in Texas run by a group of 30 somethings raking in millions from each of the biggest names. Stuff like common usage of secretive apps that run the same way as Parler, where there is a layer of anonyminity. These apps and these shell companies would turn up on report after report and I never really got to the bottom of it.
  I find it very strange that something that was so easy to find with a very distinct and profound pattern, stays buried in the informational purgatory that defines today's journalism ecosystem where most of them can't seem to find a way to do their damn jobs. I hope the team run by Jack Smith can break the ice here by uncovering a few of these rabbit holes that explain how cash gets moved around and spent in this blatantly conspiratorial manner. This is something that we all should know about and the very reason behind the mandated reports >
  
  I want to know how right wing media in the US and Russian state propaganda are spouting the same message seemingly simultaneously and in lockstep with each other… >
  
  I feel that this may be an under reported story that potentially could be rather explosive if they find a bunch of people who 'cannot recall' because their defense is being funded by trump's campaign slush fund. >
  
  Or Russia. Or Sandia Arabia. >
  
  So. A corporate bribery scheme? >
  
  You don't need classified documents for that. >
  
  That’s why Trump did the NFTs.   Not for the 4.5 million, but for the millions of other untraceable money. >
  
  The Russians are probably paying for his legal bills.  Gotta protect their asset. >
  
  The GOP is paying for his legal bills. The question is if Trump is using these legal funds to pay for lawyers of potential Jan 6 witnesses. If he is and those lawyers are instructing their “clients” to lie to Congress and DOJ, well then that’s a recipe for some RICO. >
  
  Can we indict this pos yet???