comment: >
  
  I fed an AI program the first Harry Potter book and told it to write another chapter. It didn't make a lot of sense. Grammar was a mess. Even fixing sentences, it had no structure and the plot didn't make sense. I wasn't impressed with AI writing. It doesn't have a ultimate purpose for writing like a writer would.
  The new AI that does images is interesting since you can say "South Africa as a villain" or "Ronald McDonald in impressionist style". Maybe you could say "Story on inequality set in 1930 mid-America" and get something that has an underlying message like "Grapes of Wrath". I was using a simple python AI front end.
context: If it exist someone will try to ruin it. >
  
  Please identify all the axes that belong to you in this photo before your comment will be posted >
  
  Can someone much more knowledgeable ELI5 why I shouldn't be terrified about the onslaught of AI created content that society is clearly not ready to handle or has that ship sailed? >
  
  It’s more like a search engine than an omniscient AI, but it bridges a gap that search engines did not - synthesizing information. It’s evolutionary but not revolutionary.
  A practiced bullshitter would simply google an essay prompt and begin copy-pasting across the results until they had a cobbled-together essay. That’s practically what ChatGPT is doing very well.