comment: >
  
  You mean Harvey Weinstein, the guy whose balls are surgically attached to his thighs after venereal disease rotted his scrotum off?
context: No, Harvey, I think it was the rape. >
  
  The devil is always in the details >
  
  I think in this case the devil is in the defendant's chair, but close enough. >
  
  "I didn't get a fair trial because of the consequences of my actions" >
  
  I recently listened to a podcast, Mira Sorvino interview. She didn't go into great detail but she rejected Harvey three different times. Despite an academy award she suddenly couldn't find work and for 20 years she never made the connection. 
  Once stories started coming out she actually received a couple of letters from directors apologizing saying they had wanted to hire her but Harvey had put the word out. 
  So through the years, always being told no, she continued to audition and no one ever told her she had been blacklisted. It was a charade.
  She said acting has always been her passion in life and Harvey Weinstein stole it from her. He's so gross. Fortunately, she's started working again. >
  
  I thought the movement started cause of this mother fucker. >
  
  No! It started because of that woman telling people things!
  ^^^/s, ^^^just ^^^in ^^^case >
  
  There would be some sense of humanity in the person if they just were like “yup, I did it, I regret it and accept my punishment.”
  But no, this dude that sexually assaulted what has to be hundreds of women still thinks he can walk. >
  
  Narrator: "It was the raping" >
  
  Bitch, YOU WERE #MeToo >
  
  What a little bitch. 
  For years and years, he terrorized so many women. Then he is exposed and this gives life to empower women to fight back. 
  That’s all he has for his appeal?  Nope. >
  
  How dare women step up/ out and report abuse....say some men. >
  
  Everybody pointing to this dude as an example of rampant sexual assault across many actresses, including an in depth piece on uma Thurman, and this mfer says it's not fair despite being the most egregious monster? 
  Throw him back in the cell. >
  
  How many years did Hollywood tolerate his shit? Thirty? It was not a secret. Now he gets to suffer the consequences of what he did. To quote a film he produced “world’s smallest violin.” What about his enablers? What time do they get to serve? Why do they still get to have a career, unlike any of the women who he raped? Quentin? >
  
  Truthfully, Hollywood has tolerated it since there’s been a Hollywood.  It’s only at #MeToo that something resembling a reckoning happened and Weinstein’s past actions became front and center.  Shame the likes of Woody Allen or Roman Polanski haven’t had the same effect. >
  
  That’s a really weird way to say “the things he did” >
  
  Bold words for a rapist with a rotted dick and no balls. >
  
  harvey is a scum bag.  He is too afraid to suffer the consequences of his actions.  He needs to pay. >
  
  No dear I think it was the sexual misconduct and other awful stuff. >
  
  I hope he’s in jail forever. But honestly the thought that he was responsible for the birth and death of Miramax is heartbreaking. For a while, all the great films were Miramax. Too bad his brother obviously never had much involvement in running it. I’ve heard he didn’t much like Harvey either. >
  
  Bob did the teen and horror films (Scream, Scary Movie, endless Hellraiser sequels etc) under the Dimension films moniker. >
  
  Who ? Oh the weird guy in cell block c.