comment: >
  
  It’s vanity fair, the Jan 6th committee probably wrote that article.
  (Btw I support the committee, and trump going away, but let’s call a spade a spade, VF only reports one way)
context: Narrator: It won't >
  
  Audience: that tracks >
  
  Well, you can read the report, or you can have Tucker Carlson tell you what to think about it.
  Guess which path most Republicans will choose. >
  
  Hunters laptop? >
  
  They found a draft 1/6 report on Hunter's laptop, COLLUSION between the radical Marxist Dems and the FBI paid Twitter not to post it - THEY ARE TRYING TO DESTROY OUR ONCE GREAT COUNTRY, WHICH IS NOW SICK...WITCH HUNT! /s >
  
  You forgot to use WAR ON >
  
  I don't think they are really that desperate. They just have to say "nuh-uh" and it all just goes away for their voters. Poof! >
  
  Trump had to do those things because the woke-liberals were coming to destroy him and baby Jesus. >
  
  If their base watched news that would actually report the findings, then there would be a problem of discrediting it. Just some more witch hunt, political attack fodder coming. >
  
  Remember the shot person on 5th ave? They DO NOT care. >
  
  The Right's vast media networks will only report the Trump/GOP "witch hunt" narrative and refuse to factually report on the actual findings.
  It's all lies and disinfo over on the Right. >
  
  Should but won't >
  
  Very presumptuous of you to think that any GOP members will read the report. >
  
  ‘Should’ being the key word, here. >
  
  The republicans trying to lie their way out of it and pretend it didn’t happen is the same way my toddler handles getting into trouble. >
  
  There's that "should" word again. >
  
  If you don’t care about facts and if you lie as easily as you breathe, fact-based reports will have no impact on how you see the world. >
  
  “Should” >
  
  You mean the same GOP that ignores any sort of evidence? >
  
  It won't. Just because their names did not appear in this report, does not mean that Smith's won't name them. They have to circle the wagons around Trump to protect themselves, as always. >
  
  yeah texts and emails and recorded phone calls mean nothing... >
  
  but sad to say you know how they "discredit it"?  by ignoring it.  by not actually reading it lol.