comment: >
  
  “Should”
context: Narrator: It won't >
  
  Audience: that tracks >
  
  Well, you can read the report, or you can have Tucker Carlson tell you what to think about it.
  Guess which path most Republicans will choose. >
  
  Hunters laptop? >
  
  They found a draft 1/6 report on Hunter's laptop, COLLUSION between the radical Marxist Dems and the FBI paid Twitter not to post it - THEY ARE TRYING TO DESTROY OUR ONCE GREAT COUNTRY, WHICH IS NOW SICK...WITCH HUNT! /s >
  
  You forgot to use WAR ON >
  
  I don't think they are really that desperate. They just have to say "nuh-uh" and it all just goes away for their voters. Poof! >
  
  Trump had to do those things because the woke-liberals were coming to destroy him and baby Jesus. >
  
  If their base watched news that would actually report the findings, then there would be a problem of discrediting it. Just some more witch hunt, political attack fodder coming. >
  
  Remember the shot person on 5th ave? They DO NOT care. >
  
  The Right's vast media networks will only report the Trump/GOP "witch hunt" narrative and refuse to factually report on the actual findings.
  It's all lies and disinfo over on the Right. >
  
  Should but won't >
  
  Very presumptuous of you to think that any GOP members will read the report. >
  
  ‘Should’ being the key word, here. >
  
  The republicans trying to lie their way out of it and pretend it didn’t happen is the same way my toddler handles getting into trouble. >
  
  There's that "should" word again. >
  
  If you don’t care about facts and if you lie as easily as you breathe, fact-based reports will have no impact on how you see the world.