comment: >
  
  Dobbs
context: Will not happen short of some unforeseen political realignment since this is the only way a GOP candidate can win the presidency at this point >
  
  But the EC could be nullified via the NPVIC, which can be adopted state-by-state, and just ratified by Congress via the normal legislative process.
  So, right now, only a few more states need to adopt it, and Congress could ratify it right now, before the GOP House majority takes over in the new Congress a week from tomorrow. Then, as soon as enough states signed on, it would be effective, and the GOP would have no means to block it. >
  
  Leaving aside that there’s no way that bill survives a filibuster, even if it was passed and enough states committed to make it work then SCOTUS  will take up some case from voters in Idaho who say it violates there first amendment rights. The legitimacy of that sort of case is irrelevant for this court, they can just throw out laws they don’t like. >
  
  
  SCOTUS will take up some case from voters in Idaho who say it violates there first amendment rights
  
  Huh. What does this have to do with the 1st amendment? If it's deemed unconstitutional, it would violate the Compact Clause of the Constitution since States cannot enter into agreements with each other without the consent of Congress >
  
  Did you finish reading my comment? The justification for anything SCOTUS does has gone out the window. They will invent whichever ruling gets them what they want. >
  
  
  . They will invent whichever ruling gets them what they want
  
  In which decision did they invent a rationale for a ruling?