comment: >
  
  Isn’t it actually importing though?
context: *kidnap. They’re preparing to kidnap 100,000 Ukrainians >
  
  Abduct. Kidnap is when you nap a kid. Although there's probably gonna be some kids in that. >
  
  You're talking about legal terms, I'm talking about etymology.
  Wikipedia, much like the dictionary, is not an authority. >
  
  More pointing out common usage and helping you to not be an off-putting pedant.
  And the dictionary is absolutely the fucking authority on language usage, wtf? >
  
  It's a record of usage, words are made-up and thus do not have inherent meaning.
  Language is descriptive, not proscriptive.
  If you picked a tone out of me being clinical that's more a you thing than a me thing. >
  
  It wasn't a tone, just a general cuntiness. >
  
  It absolutely wasn't, you just assumed it was.
  You've now explicitly insulted me two or three separate times and I haven't said a thing against you.
  You even had the audacity to pretend you were doing me a favor by "helping" me.
  Goodbye. >
  
  Not deport. “Kidnap” is maybe the word. “Ethnically cleansed from their homeland” might work. And so on. 
  The media’s insane standard of impartiality is killing this world. Call shit what it is. >
  
  Deport is the word.  Just add it to the list of war crimes, I guess...