comment: >
  
  Its Baghdad Bob 2.0!
context: This reminded me of that anti-EU dude who tried to light an EU-flag on fire for a video statement, but was unable to due to EU-regulations making said flag fire resistant.
  Save that fire, Russia. I hear the Winter gets cold over there. >
  
  
  Save that fire, Russia. I hear the Winter gets cold over there.
  
  That doesn't really work for the country that sells natural gas to most of Europe though, and Russians have kept warm long before discovering the gas deposits :) Like telling Saudi Arabia to save on gas. >
  
  ... through so much fuel because they have to catch up to the retreating russian lines.
  Ftfy >
  
  Sick burn! >
  
  As in "British tankses. They burn ussss!!!"?
  Yes, that's the general idea. >
  
  Will burn ... through russias iranian defenses >
  
  I am seriously considering the possibility that Russia is being tedious and comical on purpose so that people get sick of hearing about them and lose interest in supporting Ukraine.
  Like, it's not even outrageous anymore, it's just tiresome. >
  
  Dont give them ideas that actually might work lol >
  
  Good luck - 
  From Wiki: During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Challenger 2 tanks suffered no tank losses to Iraqi fire. In one encounter within an urban area, a Challenger 2 came under attack from irregular forces with machine guns and rocket propelled grenades. The driver's sight was damaged and while attempting to back away under the commander's directions, the other sights were damaged and the tank threw its tracks entering a ditch. It was hit by 14 rocket propelled grenades from close range and a MILAN anti-tank missile.[44] The crew survived, safe within the tank until it was recovered for repairs, the worst damage being to the sighting system. It was back in operation six hours later. According to British army, one Challenger 2 operating near Basra survived being hit by 70 RPGs in another incident >
  
  Okay now do the same thing but with iranian suicide drones swarming the battlefield, instead of RPG7's that were made when your dad was in grade school.  Challys have never been destroyed not because they're some crazy super tank, but because of the conditions they've been picked and chosen to operate in. >
  
  well you can pick off those shitty drones with a hand gun, so yeah, im sure they are scared :D >
  
  You can also pick off A-10 warthogs with a handgun, but it doesn't make it an effective method when you have a stinger from the early 1970s. >
  
  ok rusbot, back to bed...... enjoy your conscription soon >
  
  Ah yes, I'm a russiabot because I live in reality that there are no invulnerable tanks, and chally 2's have never had to face drones, and that Leo 2's have had their turrets pop off just like T72's in the last 10 years, with more advanced models than ukraine is going to be getting.
  More heavy armor isn't even going to do anything for them in the type of war happening in ukraine, it's all a propaganda campaign on both sides of the border. >
  
  
  More heavy armor isn't even going to do anything for them in the type of war happening in ukraine
  
  So, what is going to do something for them then, in your reality? Besides rolling over and die? >
  
  Well duh, they obviously gotta heat up their teas somehow. >
  
  I came here for the tea comment. >
  
  An army marches on it's stomachs. Gotta provide them with that tea so they can chew through Nazis like it's nobody's business. >
  
  Saltier than Solidar… >
  
  How do they know? I have seen Russian tanks burn, but haven't seen a British tank burn yet. The tanks are not the same. >
  
  British tanks have on board kettles to make tea. So while they don't burn, they sure do boil. >
  
  Well yes, equipment gets destroyed in war, that's kinda the whole problem with wars. I dont see why british tanks would be invulnerable, but I guess russia likes to state the obvious? >
  
  Just ammo for Russian propaganda, the challenger 2 tanks have never had any losses caused by enemy forces (only one has ever been knocked out but was during a friendly fire incident). If Russia do manage to destroy any then they will almost certainly try to paint it as western weakness or something. >
  
  True but has Challenger 2 ever fought in this type of war?  Not saying it isn't a quality tank, just even the best tanks take casualties in a high intensity war. >
  
  Dude.  One got stuck and took 14 rpgs and the crew survived, the tank was recovered, and put back in service 6 hours later.  That fucking nuts! >
  
  What a fucking tank >
  
  How? Did you get someone competent to fight for you? >
  
  Might be, but not before having inflicted heavy damage to the invading force. >
  
  Russia- “You may kill more of our tanks but we will keep sending more until we eventually destroy you”
  Challenger- “Good, that’s what I was designed for”