comment: >
  
  This guy is the worst one of these Tories so far. Can't make decision about anything.
context: This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 67%. (I'm a bot)
  
  
  The United Kingdom is temporarily withdrawing its ambassador to Iran for consultations, and has summoned Iran's charge d'affaires following the execution of British-Iranian dual national Alireza Akbari.
  It was also reported Sunday in British daily newspaper The Telegraph that London is reconsidering its support for the Iran nuclear deal.
  On Saturday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak himself reacted to the execution of Akbari, accusing Iran of a "Ruthless and cowardly act, perpetrated by a barbaric regime with no respect for the rights of its own people."
  
  
  Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iran^#1 regime^#2 Iranian^#3 Akbari^#4 Minister^#5 >
  
  As they should. That deal is worth toilet paper at this point. Viva la revolution! I’m rooting hard for the Iranian people because I’d love to visit someday. >
  
  Cheap pistachios here we come! >
  
  I see a lot about this nuclear deal, anyone able to explain what exactly it is in relatively simple terms? >
  
  Worthless piece of paper since trump pulled out of the agreement that was signed under obama >
  
  It was useless when Obama signed it.  Just kicked the can down the road and assumed the religious totalitarians would choose economy over nukes or conquest in ten years.
  Was never going to work.  Eg: Russia >
  
  Anyone who thought the Iran deal was ever going to work fundamentally misunderstands the point of the Islamic Revolution. >
  
  I don't know if it would have worked, but by pulling out (and then bombing the fuck out of an Iranian general...) it all but proved that the only guarantee of national safety is the possession nuclear weaponry.
  Russia is just the latest example of that theory working. >
  
  National security is not the Ayatollah's goal.  The entire Iranian Revolution was based on the idea of ridding Western influence over the entire Middle East.    
  Sunni Shia sectarian violence is nothing new, it's just been accelerated by the development of more horrific killing machines.  
  They were not in compliance of the deal.   I presume that the governments of the time just couldn't fathom a man like Donald J Trump, who would accelerate the issue could become leader of the free world so were happy to kick the can down the road
  I do not believe the intention of the deal was ever to secure a nuclear free Iran for any serious extended amount of time
  but the clock was ticking
  Something had to be done to stop Israel from setting off a match that would have burnt the region down. >
  
  The United Nations General Assembly snapped into a rare emergency session when an Israeli walked somewhere. 
  Here, a man was executed. 
  Nothing.
  Silence.