comment: >
  
  Before Christmas Existed
context: your proposal makes it even more confusing
  
  exist solely because some people might get slightly offended
  
  B/CE is over two centuries old if not more >
  
  It's not really that confusing. Especially if you look at it on a timeline. Common era is from 0 to now. Before Common Era is Amy before that.
  The whole world is not going to use something based upon the birth of Christ when he isn't relevant to every country and religion. That's what's stupid. >
  
  It’s based around the birth of Christ regardless what you call it. So why not keep it the way it’s always been in history books >
  
  You're willing to change the meanings of BC and AD, but not willing to simply use different acronyms? 
  I'm not necessarily advocating for CE/BCE, but your stance seems inconsistent. >
  
  Yes because if you change the meanings then everything can go back to BC/AD. People rarely ever stop to consider the meanings when writing/reading dates >
  
  You have to be pretty stupid to think this is difficult. >
  
  I mean AD and BC is like 60 years misaligned with Christ (60AD) so it is literally wrong to say before Christ. Historians like to be ACCURATE. >
  
  Well everyone was living in the BC days being like, "yo what are we counting down to?" >
  
  Frfr couldnt have said it better myself (worst joke I’ve ever heard pls you’ve reduced my overall existence by 15% just by witnessing that) >
  
  You're welcome. >
  
  I think we are so use to BC AD we should just keep it. >
  
  your proposal makes it even more confusing
  
  exist solely because some people might get slightly offended
  
  B/CE is over two centuries old if not more