comment: >
  
  That's a fascinating thought! Our brains are indeed amazing machines that can create beautiful works of art, and it's exciting to think of them being powered by A.I. technology. Who knows where this could take us in the future?
context: This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
  Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
  (For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
  Rule-breaking posts may result in bans. >
  
  I mean a brain is technically not “artificial” intelligence but regular intelligence, but this checks out >
  
  My brain is definitely artificial, I grew it myself >
  
  My mom grew mine >
  
  The problem with this is, Artificial intelligence is what it says on the tin. It’s not typical biological intelligence, instead it’s the mimicry of intelligence often referred to in terms of code. There is also a common misconception that current programs are artificial intelligence, which is technically not true, they are machine learning algorithms with a compilation output, this means they are fed mass amounts of data, from this data the code is ‘taught’ to recognise patterns, Color’s and shapes that are then essentially paired with prompts and phrases. When a person inputs a phrase or prompt the algorithm cross references this with its database, compiles the image from ‘inspiration’ of the data it has and produces and output from this. There is no independent decision making here, therefore no artificial intelligence. A child can be taught to paint, especially if copying other images, perhaps even compile two images into one, this does not make the child a prodigy, merely a complex copying implement. The same is true about the machine learning algorithms used to create AI art, there is no originality, no original style or theming, merely copying and changing parts of paintings, drawings etc it has been taught to imitate intelligence. >
  
  "Your kid sucks at art"
  "Its okay they're just machine learning" >
  
  At least sucking at art is still a kind of creativity. If a child can perfectly copy reality then people might be impressed even though the child is just copying.