comment: >
  
  Sure, you're right. 
  But that will take such a monumental amount of effort, and resources that it wouldn't happen. First, someone has to leave NATO, and hope that everyone else doesn't get cold feet. Then, the massive amounts of reorientation involved, even if it's a copy and paste deal. All to admit two entities who would already probably help out NATO if necessary.
context: Whatever Turkey gain from this I hope it will be worth it because other members will not forget and it might impact Turkey in the future down the road. >
  
  Yep, good luck ever trying to join the EU. As for Hungary, it gives more reason to kick them out of the EU. >
  
  
  kick them out of the EU.
  
  I don't think that's possible. >
  
  It would be if only Poland stopped backing them >
  
  Fucking Turkey, posturing as if Finland and Sweden aren’t better prospective members than they are actual members.
  They’ve made every compromise they can, short of changing their own constitutions which isn’t a unilateral option in a free society (granted, free society may be a concept Turkey struggles with.)
  They’re just using this vote to wring more and more concessions out of the US, the latest gift is fighter jets, I heard. >
  
  Turkey and Hungary, two nations that maintained ties with Moscow since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,  have stalled on the parliamentary votes required to approve Finland and Sweden’s accession.
  Let's kick these two out of Nato, problem solved. >
  
  
  Let's kick these two out of Nato, problem solved
  
  You cannot remove members from NATO. >
  
  True... but everyone can leave and start a new one. Make hungry and turkey beg to be let in.. make them give us a bunch of outdated military crap. >
  
  And then Turkey probably gets let in for the same reason again. Control of the Bosporous, a large army, and the fact that this is a military alliance not a cultural one. >
  
  True, but if we let Sweden and Finland in first, their veto is worthless.