comment: >
  
  Funny how? One example where documents are intentionally withheld, and another where the authorities were alerted right away once the docs were discovered. My assesment of intent is based on this behaviour. Why is that funny?
context: The ONLY reason the Biden documents are a story is because Trump decided to be a douche about all this... I am 100% positive of this, because we know that the National Archives tried, for over a year, to get Trump to return documents they were positive we had... and the only reason we know this is because he refused for so long they had to make it public.
  ​
  This is simply another example of republicans doing the absolute worst thing possible, democrats doing nothing even remotely on scale of it, and yet the democrat is made to look like a guilty party. >
  
  Here's the thing too. They weren't even planning on making it public at all. It was 45's team that notified the press when his property was searched. Had he not blabbed his mouth (impossible, I know) we may have never even found out about it. >
  
  I think there's a reasonable chance this story was intended to hurt Biden because he's insisting on seeking re-election and there are those within the Democratic establishment that don't want him to run again. >
  
  They are tired of his dementia so he's being thrown under the bus >
  
  Only dementia I see is republicans deluding themselves in to thinking Biden has dementia. >
  
  Can you agree he had no reason to have those classified documents? >
  
  He obviously decided that he didn’t when he promptly returned them. Why are you trying to brainwash self in to thinking there is a scandal here? >
  
  So let me get this straight it's ok as long as he returns them after 5 years although he says he didn't even know they were there? >
  
  Yeah, that's what he is saying, as well as everyone else. Once he found he had them, they followed the correct procedure and returned them. 
  Not that complicated >
  
  If I see one more story about this dumb issue i might throw my phone in a river >
  
  Remember the Benghazi hearings? We're about to see it all over again.
  Hunter Biden's probably breathing a huge sigh of relief that the next 30 house investigations aren't all going to be about him. >
  
  Moreso his laptop will be breathing a sigh of relief.  It can go back to training for ISIS, developing gain of function viruses, and smuggling fentanyl across the southern border. >
  
  It can finally go live on a nice farm along with the DNC’s Ukrainian server, the Italian vote flipping satellite and the Jewish Space Laser. >
  
  And also, for context, look at a sample of just some of trump’s criminal history as well: tax cheat, head of a criminal fraud corporation, not allowed to be head of any non-profit organization due to his non-profit’s fraud behavior, settled for $25 million in the fraudulent trump university scam, investigated for trying multiple forms of election abuse, 16 rape accusations including one being pursued currently, ad nauseam.  And now compare that to Biden. WTF. >
  
  No no no see... Those are all made up lies by the democrats to slander trunp... >
  
  It's ridiculous that the news agencies are acting as if the two cases are the same. Trump intentionally took the documents and refuse to return them after being asked. Biden had them stored away by accident and turned them in when they were discovered. The only thing Biden did wrong was to hide his mistake from the news agencies, probably because he knew they would make a false equivalency with Trump. It turns out he was right. >
  
  It's funny though how we assess "intent". For "our guy" he gets the benefit of the doubt, their guy meant it. 
  I mean, how can you so certain that Biden had no intent to not disclose he had these documents but Trump did? This is just an be example of tribal thinking. We have no way of knowing Biden's intent or if it was just an accident. It's been reported some of the classifed docs related to Ukraine, where his son was working? Relevant ? Who knows. 
  I personally think this story is overblown. But do we even know the contents of these documents, in either case? I think that matters in order to try and ascertain intent.