comment: >
  
  Sure, hillarious.  But in the real world are people not concerned for the intelligence assets that would be exposed by looking at the Mar-a-Lago logs?  Probably lots of russian, chinese, even north korean agents could be exposed and endangered.  /s
context: In seeking a warrant for the August search of Mar-a-Lago, an FBI agent said the bureau had “probable cause to believe that evidence of obstruction will be found” there. That indicates that prosecutors believed Trump or aides committed crimes by attempting to hang onto material that belonged to the government. That’s a far more serious issue than what has been alleged, at least publicly, in the Biden matter.
  But Republicans have brushed off such differences. In recent days, critics have taken issue with Biden’s failure to announce the initial discovery of material at the Biden Center before the midterm election, though he faced no legal requirement to do so.
  
  Republicans do not care about equality or justice for the United States of America. >
  
  They probably only want to know if Hunter visited so they can get even more outraged over nothing. >
  
  “You see it says right there…, signed in at 3:30pm…, Hunter Biden’s Laptop.” >
  
  “It’s achieved sentience! T2 was right!” - Republican pundits (probably…) >
  
  If they can arrest someone just because a security camera clearly shows them robbing a gas station, they can arrest anyone that a video camera clearly shows robbing a gas station! >
  
  Exactly! What is hard evidence? Really? Sounds communist and freedom hating! >
  
  They want lists that do not have their names on them. >
  
  Republicans are only in power because their voters are tribal voters and pay no attention to the issues.
  Also independent and Democratic voters are apathetic.
  The combination of these two lead to morons elected on R side. >
  
  It’s a revolving circle - conservatives need religious people to keep producing religious people who are stupid enough to vote against their own interests >
  
  It's not so simplistic... Suburban white women want to feel superior to the poor's too >
  
  The hypocrisy is real. >
  
  The GQP has always been the party of hypocrites. Remember that supposed Christian Trump cheats on his wife, sexually assaults women, and puts Catholic immigrants in concentration camps just because they're brown. >
  
  House Republicans. Go fuck yourselves. >
  
  Which is fine.  Give the GOP everything it wants.  The Democrats on the committee (if McCarthy allows any) can keep asking "And  how would cyou ompare Hunter Biden's influence with the VP with Kushner's when he was actually working in the White House and accepting $2B bailouts for his failed real estate holdings?" >
  
  You and I see that but they won't.  They didn't see the nepotism, private meetings, $2B loans as any issues, nor the sheer amount of documents at Mar A Largo with who knows how many visitors.
  But if there is ANY chance that Hunter Biden would have been in the house, even for a day, they will go bananas with it.  Almost like he had no reason to be there, at a family home, other than to use these documents to further his mysterious china dealings. >
  
  
  But if there is ANY chance that Hunter Biden would have been in the house, even for a day, they will go bananas with it.
  
  Mar-el-Largo mob of white supremacist conspiracy nuts will always..ahem...trump the Biden family dog and grand kids as a "security threat".
  The hearings are going to be a glaring spotlight on Trump vs. Biden on every level. >
  
  Hmmmm Did Americans know that the WH Archives were trying to retrieve documents from trump for 9 months before the raid?  No.  No we didn't. >
  
  A double standard? Why I am just SHOCKED! >
  
  "It seems like you're only concerned about classified documents being mishandled when a democrat does it." No we're not !" (But that is exactly the case....) >
  
  They don’t need mar-a-lago logs, trump de-classified all those top secret docs with his bigly mind. Biden has made no indication that he used his mind on any of those docs. >
  
  Who has a visitor log for their home? >
  
  I'm making one now >
  
  Prepare for the assumptions they will make about the records which the right will then take as a fact. It's always the same shit with these fools. "There are 10 seconds missing from this meeting, hence Biden sold America to China probably" >
  
  Can all the news outlets and maybe some of this sub stop masturbating over House republicans?  They’re going to talk a ton of trash, run Benghazi Investigations v2.0 for two years, and get sweet FA actually done (probably they will crash the government by shutting it down as a temper tantrum) and that’s it. 
  “House republicans say . .   “      Shutup!  Already.    Damn. >
  
  They could crater the global economy next week if they just act themselves.  It isn’t some irrelevant thing. >
  
  These types of articles are just silly.  Everybody knows the Republicans are epic pieces of human garbage.  Complete hypocrites, we get it. >
  
  Because tump didn’t do anything wrong, but Biden is the devil. Just ask any rubelican. >
  
  They need to check all trump properties. >
  
  Laws/rules are for thee, not the GQP. >
  
  
  In seeking a warrant for the August search of Mar-a-Lago, an FBI agent said the bureau had “probable cause to believe that evidence of obstruction will be found” there. That indicates that prosecutors believed Trump or aides committed crimes by attempting to hang onto material that belonged to the government. That’s a far more serious issue than what has been alleged, at least publicly, in the Biden matter.
  But Republicans have brushed off such differences. In recent days, critics have taken issue with Biden’s failure to announce the initial discovery of material at the Biden Center before the midterm election, though he faced no legal requirement to do so.
  
  Republicans do not care about equality or justice for the United States of America. >
  
  Republicans are committed to making your life more painful—in an effort to gain more power for themselves. >
  
  To be fair, they really only care about gaining wealth and power. If it was doable without destroying the planet, oppressing the working class, or increasing suffering 10-fold, I'm sure they'd give that route a try. >
  
  If they think there's an ounce more effort I doubt it and some are just play cruel bullies like trump. >
  
  Yeah. I guess in a system that rewards depravity, corruption, and cruelty, there's really only one type of person you can expect to find at the top. >
  
  If they can arrest someone just because a security camera clearly shows them robbing a gas station, they can arrest anyone that a video camera clearly shows robbing a gas station! >
  
  Exactly! What is hard evidence? Really? Sounds communist and freedom hating! >
  
  They probably only want to know if Hunter visited so they can get even more outraged over nothing. >
  
  “You see it says right there…, signed in at 3:30pm…, Hunter Biden’s Laptop.” >
  
  “It’s achieved sentience! T2 was right!” - Republican pundits (probably…) >
  
  They want lists that do not have their names on them. >
  
  Republicans are only in power because their voters are tribal voters and pay no attention to the issues.
  Also independent and Democratic voters are apathetic.
  The combination of these two lead to morons elected on R side. >
  
  It’s a revolving circle - conservatives need religious people to keep producing religious people who are stupid enough to vote against their own interests >
  
  It's not so simplistic... Suburban white women want to feel superior to the poor's too >
  
  Also conservatives: I will hurt but you will hurt more >
  
  The GQP has always been the party of hypocrites. Remember that supposed Christian Trump cheats on his wife, sexually assaults women, and puts Catholic immigrants in concentration camps just because they're brown. >
  
  Who has a visitor log for their home? >
  
  I'm making one now >
  
  My dogs have a record of every visitor’s scent.  Everybody. >
  
  House Republicans. Go fuck yourselves. >
  
  The hypocrisy is real. >
  
  Which is fine.  Give the GOP everything it wants.  The Democrats on the committee (if McCarthy allows any) can keep asking "And  how would cyou ompare Hunter Biden's influence with the VP with Kushner's when he was actually working in the White House and accepting $2B bailouts for his failed real estate holdings?" >
  
  I don't agree.  They will scour through the records to find someone that they can then generate outrage about.  Someone that could be tied to an investigation, bank, foreign country, who knows, and they will ramp up more conspiracy theories. >
  
  
  They will scour through the records to find someone that they can then generate outrage about.
  
  They don;t need to find anyone or anything for Fox and the rest of the GOP owned and operated media to be "outraged".
  Problem is that Trump's antics on same issue will constantly provide a contrast.
  
  A couple papers with Biden, BOXES of them with Trump.
  Biden turns them over. Trump refuses to give them up (illegal)
  Trump claims they are declassified, a lie and also illegal. >
  
  I would have to argue that classified is, well classified. It shouldn’t matter how many, or the willingness in which they were received or handed over, but the mishandling of said documents. And no, I’m not saying trump is defendable in any way, and I certainly don’t support that side (either really) but negating the seriousness of mishandling classified documents on one side to propel another is absurd. Just break it down in simple terms, and stop comparing for the sale of an argument. >
  
  
  It shouldn’t matter how many, or the willingness in which they were received or handed over, but the mishandling of said documents.
  
  Not like Trump or Biden handled the documents.  Haven't seen any Allied Van Lines being arrested for mishandling documents.
  The only issue is what happens when you find them.
  Trump lied about them, refused to give  them up, made claims they were not classified.  Was refusing to turn them over illegal? Was claiming they were no classified documents when there were illegal?
  No questions exist with Biden. >
  
  Hmmmm Did Americans know that the WH Archives were trying to retrieve documents from trump for 9 months before the raid?  No.  No we didn't. >
  
  "It seems like you're only concerned about classified documents being mishandled when a democrat does it." No we're not !" (But that is exactly the case....) >
  
  They don’t need mar-a-lago logs, trump de-classified all those top secret docs with his bigly mind. Biden has made no indication that he used his mind on any of those docs. >
  
  A double standard? Why I am just SHOCKED! >
  
  ╔═════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ════════════════╗  
           The GOP is a bona fide, de facto, corporatized
                       Organized Crime Syndicate.  
  ╚═════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ════════════════╝
  And a cult.
  (☝˘▾˘)☝ >
  
  Prepare for the assumptions they will make about the records which the right will then take as a fact. It's always the same shit with these fools. "There are 10 seconds missing from this meeting, hence Biden sold America to China probably" >
  
  I just want to know which Secreto Servize agent(s) planted the classified docs in Biden's home and office.  That is all.... >
  
  Can all the news outlets and maybe some of this sub stop masturbating over House republicans?  They’re going to talk a ton of trash, run Benghazi Investigations v2.0 for two years, and get sweet FA actually done (probably they will crash the government by shutting it down as a temper tantrum) and that’s it. 
  “House republicans say . .   “      Shutup!  Already.    Damn. >
  
  They could crater the global economy next week if they just act themselves.  It isn’t some irrelevant thing. >
  
  I’m so fucking sick of American government. The Supreme Court and ALL of congress are a joke. It’s bleak when Joe Biden is the brightest star in the sky out of the three branches. And I voted for him. >
  
  These types of articles are just silly.  Everybody knows the Republicans are epic pieces of human garbage.  Complete hypocrites, we get it. >
  
  They need to check all trump properties. >
  
  Laws/rules are for thee, not the GQP. >
  
  Can someone fill me in? Classified documents found at Biden's house? Why? Is there a protocol that allows this? Why are classified documents seemingly just handled like papers in a manila folder these days? >
  
  Lol it’s good to see this sub flounder, haha >
  
  Since when is common sense considered news? Of course they’d only want the logs for Bidens house not for Trumps. >
  
  I don’t like it when Republicans play “what about” with their idiot scandals, I’d appreciate it if MotherJones could keep it in their pants with this one. Biden played it fast and lose with classified documents. It was mistake, it seems, he has so far made a few times. He should take his lumps for it and move on.
  Especially given that Republicans are not likely to discover love of country or a conscience anytime soon, anyway. This article serves no one, but I imagine it’s getting lots of reach on Facebook. >
  
  Because tump didn’t do anything wrong, but Biden is the devil. Just ask any rubelican.