comment: >
  
  I wouldn’t rule out anything. If you have experienced naval aviators making some of the observations. Not only are the qualified to fly a jet, many have degrees in physics and engineering. If they can’t explain something, I’m inclined to listen to what they have to say. 
  It could be new tech that the world hasn’t seen yet. Imagine the stealth bomber being seen for the first time. A big triangle gliding across the sky and it also has a tiny radar signature. Back in the 70s, that could be interpreted as a UFO. 
  If it extraterrestrials, there is next to nothing we can actually do about it. Just by reaching our planet from another star their technology is hundreds of years ahead of ours. Defending against that level of technology would be like trying to defend against the US military with muskets and cannonballs.
context: Reading through this news article, pulled the following out:
  "I've met with scientists, some of the top people in the world, that tell me that we have extraterrestrial craft in our airspace on a regular basis,” Burchett added."
  What scientists? >
  
  This part bothers me:
  
  NASA has selected 16 individuals to participate in its independent study team on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). Observations of events in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or as known natural phenomena are categorized as UAPs.
  
  The word, phenomena, is the plural of *phenomenon. so why add the ‘s’ for the plural?  It is a UAP. They are UAP. It’s still UAP, either way!  
  Grrr.  I expect more from NASA. >
  
  Hey NASA scientists do math, not do English. >
  
  Why use big word when math do? >
  
  i yearn for the days when republicans were just "ha ha" crazy