comment: >
  
  I really don’t think so. The person with the clearance is responsible.
context: Doesn't he have a fireplace? >
  
  And a gas stove too! >
  
  And toilets!? >
  
  Maybe a dog too? >
  
  How about "found" the documents. I don't think it's exactly like they struggled to get away. >
  
  Seriously,  nothing was "seized" as they weren't there without permission. Biden is fully cooperating with DOJ and the national archives. >
  
  The documents were there without permission.
  "Seized" is used the same way you'd use "seized" for any other contraband. >
  
  The agency was there with permission,  I wasn't referring to the documents. >
  
  The title is referring to documents which were there illegally and can be seized.
  The same way you can seize a stolen car. This isn't hard to understand. >
  
  Just declassify them in your head Joe. Worked for the other guy. >
  
  It works even better for him, because he is actively president, unlike the other guy retroactively declassifying things >
  
  I haven't seen anything on what might be in these documents, but if my memory is correct, the other guy had nuclear secrets in his stash. >
  
  Ah yes. My teacher SEIZED my homework when I turned it in. >
  
  I kinda feel this is nonequivalent to the article.  Biden didn't turn these documents (dated back to the Senate days) in, all he did was cooperate and allowed the search.  The FBI found  and seized the latest documents.
  Better example: My teacher SEIZED my homework from my bag when I never turned it in. >
  
  You know its not looking good when you're playing semantics >
  
  You also know it's not looking good when you have to use false equivalence in attempt to downplay Biden's fuckup. >
  
  Indeed >
  
  Much ado about nothing. >
  
  It's almost as if there is an effort to get this news out repeatedly. >
  
  I know this isn't the same thing and the Trump con, but this doesn't look good whatsoever. >
  
  It's nowhere near as bad. If they're from his time as vice president, the National Archives obviously didn't know they were even missing and he wasn't trying to prevent their return. Trump basically ignored the NA informing him they were missing documents and asked form then to be returned and Trump basically refused to cooperate to the point his home was raided. Biden has been fully cooperating and he/his staff had previously found documents and returned them on their own. >
  
  And why didn't the N A know they were missing? Seems like the entire process of handling classified documents needs to be overhauled. >
  
  Likely human error as, from reports that I've read, it's a small number of rocuments like less than 30 from many different larger files. Trump had numerous files and hundreds of thousands of documents. >
  
  Very strict protocols around the handling of these documents.
  Criminal investigation needs to be started. >
  
  It's going to be low level staffers. The principles don't deal with things like storage.