comment: >
  
  I don't think Finlands desire to join together with Sweden has anything to do with Swedens occupation of Finland, rather it has to do with the good, modern relations.
context: At this point Erdogan has spewed so much propaganda against Sweden that he cannot accept Sweden into NATO without losing popularity. So at least until Turkish election is over there is no bribe that can get Sweden into NATO. >
  
  Fully agreed. It is currently far more valuable for Erdogan to continue to play the role of the "protector of Turkey against evil westerners". And given the abysmal state of the Turkish economy - not to mention his own low popularity - he will need every little bit of distraction and patriotic indignation or fervor he can rile up.
  We can revisit the topic in June, after the elections.
  Luckily, Sweden and Finland are well protected and in no hurry whatsoever, so the Turkish show can go on. >
  
  Swedes are burning Qurans outside the Turkish embassy while Turks are burning Swedish flags outside the Swedish embassy. Honestly Sweden right now has less chance of joining NATO this century than Russia does. >
  
  One Danish idiot burned a Quran. Not really a Sweden thing >
  
  What about Finland? >
  
  If I'm not wrong turkey said they don't have any issue with Finland joining, but Finland wants to join with Sweden together. >
  
  That is correct. Finland and Sweden were one and same country from around 1200 to 1809, and will join NATO together. 
  Turkey's delaying tactics and the entire bazaar haggling show is an annoyance of course, but there is no hurry. Finland and Sweden are both already guaranteed by all key NATO members, and Russia will not be in any position to threaten them for years to come.