comment: >
  
  so... task failed successfully?
context: Some things aren't even conspiracy theories, like the CIA just straight up admits stuff lol. >
  
  Yeah and everyone's just like "Huh, cool" >
  
  We're not even like "huh cool". We're like "which person on this ballot will hold these agencies accountable?  Oh, seriously?  Neither of them?  None of them? Well okay then." >
  
  The weird thing is, not that long ago, Reddit was mocking Republican holdouts during the nomination of a speaker of the house and one of their primary demands was an investigation into the intelligence agencies.
  People are so insanely partisan that they will oppose people doing something they want if they belong to the wrong party. >
  
  What’s the point of these intelligence committees investigating themselves tho? >
  
  We have investigated ourselves and determined that we have done nothing wrong! >
  
  There's a difference between claiming that, despite a massive preponderance of evidence, something didn't actually happen (like the moon landing or the Holocaust), and coming up with a theory to explain the why and how of something that DID happen (JFK was assassinated). >
  
  
  JFK was assassinated
  
  Wrong! His head just did that all on its own.  Wake up sheeple! >
  
  It was actually a failed assassination attempt, the bullet missed Kennedy, but he was the only one aware at the moment 
  The shock of that knowledge combined with the overall stress he culminated as president was far too great, and created too much pressure in his head, with no way to release all that pressure his head exploded. 
  The government realized that if the public knew that could happen to anyone the increased panic and stress would create countrywide "head popping" scenarios, so they went with the safer story and just covered it up as a successful assassination.