comment: >
  
  How can anyone be gay and also be a Reagan Rupublican. Reagan practically committed Genocide gay men.
context: Oh wow, this bit in the article might actually be the most messed up thing I've heard about Santos so far:
  
  “I really don’t care about material stuff, but he stole something that really had sentimental value to me,” Morey-Parker told The Daily Beast, in reference to a scarf he says Santos purloined and later wore to a “Stop the Steal” rally in Washington, D.C.
  “I had tried to kill myself, and my friend gave me that scarf and hat, and she was like, ‘Now you have something physical to touch and know people love you,’” Morey-Parker said, adding that he had texted Santos while in treatment, and that Santos had known about the gift’s significance. “Watching him wear that scarf that means quite a lot to me just pisses me the fuck off.” >
  
  Hmm, purposely stealing an emotional support object from a suicidal person vs stealing the money from a fund for a homeless veteran's dying dog. It's really a toss up for which is the more reprehensible behavior. >
  
  It's the dog.  The scarf could be attributed to some personal vendetta or maybe he's just an unthoughtful asshole who forgot about the items significance despite being told.  I don't believe this, in fact, I think he probably took it because of its importance.
  But the dog thing no way to spin that.  And it's like a card game where your like that many modifiers? Dog, homeless, charity, vet, and cancer holy cow that's a lot. >
  
  How did he gain citizenship again? >
  
  I’m going to guess that he might of lied about something. >
  
  Might have. Written as a contraction, it's might've. >
  
  This seems to be a common grammar ( or typing ) error. It's a pet peeve and I appreciate you calling it! >
  
  You're both fucking annoying. >
  
  Writer at The Onion: "God fucking dammit, not again!"  Angrily crumples paper >
  
  The Onion: George Santos tells the truth in shocking interview >
  
  (☝˘▾˘)☝ here is a headline that can't ever be confused for news. >
  
  Ah, but if a Santos told a truth in a forest of lies, would anyone believe it? >
  
  I guarantee that the prior marriage was 100% fraudulent. USCIS should take a hard look at any visa petitions that were filed. >
  
  absolutely sham green-card marriage. the GOP should be pissed. revoke his citizenship and send him back to Brazil where he's a wanted man. >
  
  He's US-born. His citizenship can't be revoked, and he can't be deported.
  That's how it stands right now -- if he releases his (actual) birth certificate and it shows he was not born here, then I'll take it back. But the lack of immigration records makes me think he was US-born. >
  
  
  He's US-born.
  
  Was he? Why would you believe that? 
  
  But the lack of immigration records makes me think he was US-born.
  
  That's some bad faith bullshit. The only person who can publicize those records is Santos himself. >
  
  I don't believe it's up to Santos to provide those records. >
  
  It would be a breach of privacy for Immigration to provide any personal information like that. >
  
  FFS. Read your own source dude. 
  Literally says that you can only apply for your own data or for the data of those who give you written permission to access their records. 
  Why link to things you don't read? Dishonesty? >
  
  
  I'm not a dude, nor is it the 1980s. 
  I did read it. 
  What's keeping someone from getting permission from someone else? You think they're asking for notarized affidavits? 
  
  I'm really tired of hearing about George Santos. >
  
  Ok bro >
  
  This guy is a fucking cartoon character at this point. >
  
  A cartoon character with real congressional committee assignments. >
  
  I mean seriously who the hell is this guy and how many effed up stories are there about him? >
  
  I wonder if George Santos is even his real name lmao dude has more aliases than an actual bona fide spy. Regardless, he has either lived a roller coaster of a life and/or somehow is among the biggest pathological liars our species has EVER conjured up! >
  
  At this stage “pathological liar” and “republican” are synonyms. >
  
  I wouldn't be surprised to find out the woman was just Santos in drag. >
  
  The fabulous Kitara Ravache >
  
  I never wish for someone to break the law, but I do hope he has previously committed offenses that will be prosecuted. Let him spread his lies for everyone in his cell block. >
  
  “Good evening everyone! As you all may already know Pedro and I have decided to join our toothbrushes! Lol and a very few friends have been selected to share this special moment with us!” Santos wrote in a 2014 Facebook “engagement dinner” invitation. >
  
  He's mormon-ish, but with a sister-wife and a brother-husband. >
  
  ...and a very, very special dog.   /s >
  
  puts cash into pocket
  Hmm?