comment: >
  
  Meh. 
  Shit happens.
  You tell your people to pack it up and it gets packed up.
context: It’s my opinion that a search of any former president’s papers (live or dead, going back probably to Eisenhower or Nixon) would reveal classified papers improperly retained or stored.  The difference is the willful refusal to turn them over when asked and lying about their retention. >
  
  The difference between self reporting the impropriety and allowing an investigation, versus needing a warrant because they refuse to turn over the documents from trying to cover up the investigation. >
  
  But since Biden has a track record of being responsible with such things, it's not setting off any alarm bells.  The problem arises when the person in question is a known Russian asset who tried to overthrow the country.  THAT'S where things become different/ >
  
  Honestly they should search the home of all living presidents. I bet bush and Obama have some documents. >
  
  “So that’s where Iraq’s WMDs were!” >
  
  Was this an FBI raid after refusing to turn them over? No?
  Process working as it should. Nothing burger with extra malarkey >
  
  Six whole items. Still not comparable to Trump. >
  
  Still, any ts/sci material not properly handled is a huge security risk. Even one page >
  
  “More than half of a half of 2 dozen documents” >
  
  I sincerely believe that any Republican not named “Trump” can beat Joe Biden in 2024. Biden probably beats Trump again but I doubt that Trump will be the GOP nominee. Tough decision. >
  
  Nah, they're too unpopular outside the 40%. They can't swing moderate voters anymore. >
  
  “Lol! No way would America elect Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton!” >
  
  Speak for yourself. I knew it was going to be a coinflip. >
  
  2024 could be—will be—a coin flip. >
  
  Nah, it'll be a slaughter.