comment: >
  
  It wouldn't rate them at all because it is an inappropriate situation to measure with this metric.
context: I can get behind the spirit of this.  But it leaves waaaaay too much room for fascism, de-humanization and lies to go unchecked.  It is a recipe for false equivalence.  Defending storming the Capital in a violent attempted coup based on a lie will be rated the exact same as being outraged by that act.  These bias meters nearly always do false equivalences in order to promote the idea that they are unbiased. >
  
  Yes, the scale they are using always assumes everyone is acting in good faith so it hugely favors those who don't. >
  
  A 3 year old throwing a fit and an adult saying "hush, now" to a 3 year old throwing a fit are not the same thing.  This metric, no doubt rates them the same.