comment: >
  
  This seems to be a common grammar ( or typing ) error. It's a pet peeve and I appreciate you calling it!
context: Oh wow, this bit in the article might actually be the most messed up thing I've heard about Santos so far:
  
  “I really don’t care about material stuff, but he stole something that really had sentimental value to me,” Morey-Parker told The Daily Beast, in reference to a scarf he says Santos purloined and later wore to a “Stop the Steal” rally in Washington, D.C.
  “I had tried to kill myself, and my friend gave me that scarf and hat, and she was like, ‘Now you have something physical to touch and know people love you,’” Morey-Parker said, adding that he had texted Santos while in treatment, and that Santos had known about the gift’s significance. “Watching him wear that scarf that means quite a lot to me just pisses me the fuck off.” >
  
  Hmm, purposely stealing an emotional support object from a suicidal person vs stealing the money from a fund for a homeless veteran's dying dog. It's really a toss up for which is the more reprehensible behavior. >
  
  It's the dog.  The scarf could be attributed to some personal vendetta or maybe he's just an unthoughtful asshole who forgot about the items significance despite being told.  I don't believe this, in fact, I think he probably took it because of its importance.
  But the dog thing no way to spin that.  And it's like a card game where your like that many modifiers? Dog, homeless, charity, vet, and cancer holy cow that's a lot. >
  
  How did he gain citizenship again? >
  
  I’m going to guess that he might of lied about something. >
  
  Might have. Written as a contraction, it's might've.