comment: >
  
  Whoa, how do you even know that name.
context: I can't believe we're here again. So, where's his birth certificate? >
  
  Right? There's really no background checks on people before they take these offices? Low-level government workers have more hoops to jump through. >
  
  I think the last few years have taught us that our government operates with barely any oversight. The rules are there, they just aren't practiced. >
  
  The oversight is supposed to be the voting public. That's what it means to live in a democracy, you can't keep passing the buck forever, and since we have no king the final responsibility ends up with the voters.
  The problem is that a near-majority of the people doing oversight think that George Santos is perfectly fine. >
  
  
  The oversight is supposed to be the voting public.
  
  Awful take. First, voters are not responsible for prosecuting crimes committed by politicians in office.
  Second, our districts have been gerrymandered and we have a media apparatus that has abdicated its responsibility to inform the voting public. Not to mention we have one party erecting every barrier they can to prevent people from voting.
  So no. We don't have that oversight because its been marginalized by the very people who we are meant to oversee. >
  
  If only the forefathers thought of and provided an amendment to take back power when the government failed the people. >
  
  If his real name is not George Santos then he lied on the federal forms filed in order for him to run.  Lying to the feds is a crime.  Arrest him and put him behind bars.  That will really test the republican will to ban proxy voting in the House.  Watch how fast that stance crumbles.....  LOL!!!!! >
  
  As a Republican I support your comment.   Boot this asshat now. >
  
  As an American, why do you still vote for republicans >
  
  1 in 5 Americans are illiterate >
  
  And the other 6 struggle with numbers >
  
  No no. 1 is illereat and other 5 stuggle with number. >
  
  George is the American Dream. You can be who you wanna be. All you have to do is believe >
  
  If you you believe you're fabulous then you you will be fabulous. But in this case we might say that he is simply  "fable-ous" (sic). >
  
  "Oh did I say fabulous? I meant fabulist." >
  
  Next week’s headline: George Santos is an illegal immigrant. 
  What will the GOP do?
  Nothing. Not a damn thing. >
  
  He could honestly be a cannibal necrophiliac, who worships Chernobog and the GOP would be "Well at least he isn't a Democrat". >
  
  
  Chernobog 
  
  Peter Stormare did a great job portraying him in American Gods. >
  
  Actually that was George Santos. >
  
  I can see your confusion.  That was Peter Stormare playing George Santos playing a drag queen playing Chernobog. >
  
  It's just a matter of time before we discover that this guy is actually a robot body piloted by sewer rats. >
  
  One is enough, we already have Ted Cruz >
  
  Wait, I thought Ted Cruz was definitely one being and not several? >
  
  Definitely not a writhing mass of roaches in a human suit >
  
  Ted Cruz is one of the failed experiments that eventually led to Flubber. >
  
  No one steals from George Santos and gets away with it. The last person to do this disappeared. His name? George Santos... >
  
  George Santos doesn't do what George Santos does for George Santos. George Santos does what George Santos does because George Santos is George Santos! >
  
  If it wasn't his legal name then he wasn't the one elected. That's all you need to boot him. >
  
  Goddamn! Can he get any more attractive to the GOP? At this rate they'll be worshipping him as God incarnate! >
  
  His campaign for President will start soon! >
  
  One of his associates already ratted him out and said "He's only doing  it so he can get the lifetimes pension that comes after being in Congress. >
  
  You mean Grammy winning songbird George Santos? >
  
  No i think they are talking about the star of Hannah Montana George Santos >
  
  No I think you're thinking about the collegiate water polo champion George Santos >
  
  No you’re thinking about the CEO of Vandalay Industries George Santos. >
  
  No no, the sausage king of Chicago George Santos >
  
  No no you're thinking of the Polka Queen of Chicago, Vlasta George Santos. >
  
  Nooo...y'all are thinking of New Zealand Prime Minister George Santos. >
  
  This doesn't matter. All that matters is that 66% of people who voted for George Santos don't want him to resign.
  The article I linked states that 60% of his district want him to resign, but no Republicans care about the desires of people who don't vote Republican.
  So the reality, to them, is that 34% of Santos voters want him to resign, but 66% do not. It's high time we all stop acting shocked by all this. >
  
  I don't know, I bet a lot of them don't know about everything that's come out about him. The drag queen thing would definitely lose him voters with Republicans calling them all groomers. >
  
  If they don't know about Santos at this point, it's because they don't want to. And Republicans are perfectly happy with that. >
  
  What you have to remember is that a lot of these people will only watch conservative media like Fox News. They either won't report on this or will make vague statements like politician from liberal New York to trick their viewers into thinking he's a Democrat. Even his own voters won't realise they voted for the same guy because all they do is tick the boxes with R's beside them when voting. >
  
  He really is "a physicist, neurosurgeon, test pilot, and rock star".../s >
  
  So Buckaroo Banzai? >
  
  Baron Munchhasusen was a “Fabulist”. This guy’s a pathological liar. >
  
  His name is Tyler Durden