comment: >
  
  It’s really both things. Even if that kid never had access to a gun - his behavior should not have been ignored.
context: This teacher should be able to win a lawsuit against the school and the kid's parents. They claim the gun was secured but that was plainly not the case if a six year old could get a hold of it. >
  
  If you have a child so disturbed that a parent is supposed to be in class with them, why do you have a gun in your house let alone a loaded one?! >
  
  
  why do you have a gun in your house let alone a loaded one?!
  
  Yeah. Only in the US a 6 years old does a shooting and the coverage is like "they should have listened to warnings about kid's behavior" and not "they should have listened to warnings about parent's behavior". Everywhere else the focus would be on parents being crazy first and foremost.