comment: >
  
  Every video game movie from the 90s
context: But the whole reason they're remaking movies is because they hate taking risks. Making new stuff is risky, so they take something that has already been successful and make a low-effort remake that people will go see because the title is familiar. No studio will invest in remaking a flop. >
  
  Dune >
  
  Is one of the best-selling novels of all time and they are making a film based on the book, not on the 80's film. >
  
  I would like this.  Great concepts that were terribly executed should be remade to get the execution better. >
  
  Please give me eragon that is actually similar to the book. >
  
  The reason there are so many reboots and sequels is that the new film borrows from the previous one’s success, so the audience will go and see it because they loved the original. 
  With your plan you have an audience turned off by associate with a shit film and actual fans not wanting to go because you changed something they liked 
  Hollywood doesn’t like risk and your plan is big risk. You’re better off with brand new properties than being tainted by previous flops >
  
  
  Instead of remaking great movies, Hollywood should remake bad movies that were based on good stories, but did not meet expectations.
  
  Such as?