comment: >
  
  I think they actually recommend full hazmat gear these days, the higher the bsl rating the better.
context: Yeah former journalist here: this story reeks of ...something. NBC News Exclusive with a one source on background so deep there's no attributable information including an overview of possible job title? No additional information is known by this single source, as evidenced by this:
  
  The classification level, number and precise location of the additional documents was not immediately clear. It also was not immediately clear when the additional documents were discovered and if the search for any other classified materials Biden may have from the Obama administration is complete.
  
  When you get info like this, you want it backed up by at least one other source, even if they also remain anonymous. It's most likely that what's being reported is true and that's why they're running with it but my post-Judith Miller journalism education means my spidey sense is tingling on this one. Call it racing for a scoop, call it inadequate sourcing, I just hope they can back this one up better than they did in their public reporting. If this turns out to be inaccurate it's unfathomably bad >
  
  Formal journalist here, this story reeks of typical conservative whataboutism. >
  
  All this starting right as the new house takes over is not naturally impossible but is incredibly suspicious as well. >
  
  Get ready for daily "both sides are the same" arguments from the shitty side, for sure. >
  
  They went away? >
  
  The tide had been lower for a while. It's starting to surge again, get your waders ready