comment: >
  
  That falls under the category of "want" not "need"
context: And then it will be struck down by the supreme court shortly after.  Nothing to see here. >
  
  Good, there's also a chance they will strike down the other assault weapons bans at the same time. >
  
  Gotta have your toys. >
  
  If you think guns are toys, it's probably for the good of all of us that you don't have any. >
  
  For most of the country, yes, they are toys. For all the crazy "what if's" and dreams of taking over the government and whatnot. 
  There's no legitimate reason why an individual needs a high capacity magazine. Period. 
  This country has a disgusting gun culture that extends way beyond target shooting, hunting, and basic self-defense. >
  
  Some of us are getting arthritic and we use a device to assist in loading magazines while taking target practice, to save our thumbs. Loading is a nuisance and we prefer to do it as seldom as possible. Large mags make life a little easier. This is not an uncommon situation at all.
  IAC mag limits vs banning modern rifles are two different independent issues.