comment: >
  
  How do you definitively know this is the case? One of the chief scientists of OpenAI made the claim that some large neural networks may already be slightly conscious. As far as I know, no one has recently attempted to test the intelligence of AIs with the Turing or Lovelace tests
context: /u/to_yeet_or_to_yoink (OP) has awarded 3 delta(s) in this post.
  All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
  Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
  ^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >
  
  
  The day is fast approaching when so-called "artificial" intelligence will be indistinguishable from the "natural" intelligence of you or I  
  
  As someone who has some background in the field: Thats a pipe dream and while not utterly unfeasable, not remotely where we are now.  
  
  Don't get me wrong here - I know we aren't there yet. What we create today is, at best, on the level of toddlers.  
  
  Not even that. It would give what we have to much credit. It would imply that there is a functioning core that is already human like but just needs time to grow. Basically a "What we do now but more" situation, which is simply not the state we're at now.