>

In a world where teachers are called groomers and paedophiles for basically no fault of their own. Theres even laws for exactly what I said.
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans. >

Child labor is only considered bad if the child is unwilling to do it and if the child is deprived of education and if the occuptation is mentally, physically, socially and morally damaging.
There are laws that protect child artists from being exploited. >

I think the difference is between earning a dollar a day, and a dollar every second.
Also education, their own will to participate and the little detail of not sitting underground, inhaling coal dust. >

What if a high IQ child wants to take a job as a part time secretary while continuing school?
Would that be okay then? >

Child actors and singers are actually heavily regulated, with a ton of rules to protect the youngsters,  make sure they get their education in, et cetera. >

Why are people saying it’s not child labor? It’s not as nearly as bad as most other examples
but
It’s still an employed child.
Regardless of how much they earn, and how well protected they are, it’s a child performing labour. 
the employment of children in an industry or business,  literally the textbook definition of child labor from Oxford dictionary.
But as other people have pointed out, we think it’s okay because of their rights and how strictly it’s regulated. >

.... kids lose baby teeth. Nobody is prying them out with a pliers. She's missing the front teeth just like 6 other teeth missing in her lower jaw.  Morons like you are so far removed from reality, God save us!. >

It's just a joke... jesus, in what universe would anyone believe it was serious?