>

I am not sure about this take without an example. 
I will say, I do like when you can see philosophies influence things in a movie. Like, sometimes you can completely miss something if you don’t know context around the person saying it. The speaker can change things sometimes. 
My favorite example of this is the song writer for a lot of music in beauty and the beast. I’m the song where they hunt the beast on beauty in the beast the villagers sing “we don’t like what we don’t understand — in fact, it scares us!” This line on its own is pretty easy to read within the context of the movie, but I think it’s really cool how you get another layer when you recognize the writer of this line was a gay man who societally would have faced a lot of scrutiny in the 80s and 90s especially with the aids pandemic. (Which he did unfortunately pass away from. They dedicated the movie to him in the credits. )
Honestly,  I think this is starting to becoming a popular opinion.
It think it is fine when done well but most writters don't have the talent to pull it off or do it too much too often. >

God I hope so, so tired of being lectured at via movies. You wanna have a political message in your movie? Fine, do it. But do it like Starship Troopers anti war message, make a decent movie with bits of the message sprinkled about that takes a bit of paying attention >

Ah i also see you are a gentlehuman with immaculate taste in cinematography. 🍷🧐 >

Indubitably 🍷🧐 >

YOU WANNA LIVE FOREVER!? >

Famously, action films have never had any meaningful or significant social commentary.
Starship Troopers, Aliens, Saving Private Ryan, They Live, The Matrix, Jurassic Park, Battle Royale, Upgrade, Robocop, First Blood, any Mad Max film, Terminator films, fucking Die Hard. 
Pretty much every genre, from children's animation to sci-fi cult horror, has had meaningful social commentary in its genre at some point. In fact, the social commentary is more effective when placed into a film's narrative and weaved directly into it.
I think what you dislike is that films with poor writing tend to be bad at doing this weaving, and since production studios want to just push out things for mass consumption, they're getting writers to work overtime, and the product is being made worse by that motive.
The reality is you've always been moralised to. That's not new. If you think it is, that's actually an indicator of the skill of the writers who have being doing it. 
Is a film like Black Adam going to be as good at conveying a message as All Quiet on the Western Front? It's not unheard of, but probably not. I can tell you that the one that was doing more of the moralising was much more well received. 
In fact, I'd usually argue that a film without any message is usually pretty boring, save for absurdist films which are very much an acquired taste. >

You have to have done really poorly in English class to be unable to understand that the whole point of media is moralisation.
Like... You can't write a story without themes and ideas that are subjective?
The closest you could come is a pure survival film about a single character in nature, but even then that'd likely be interpretable as a commentary on our modern view of nature as relaxing and fun... >

Right? All media or art contains implicit and explicit value judgments. They are in everything we do. People don’t like hearing about stuff they don’t feel is important.