>

Don’t forget that only one side tried to overthrow the government on Jan 6th, 9/10 elected officials caught with kiddie porn in the last 20-years have all been republicans, and the only candidates calling openly for the murder of other citizens are all republicans.
This guy campaigned door to door in my neighborhood and was a rambling imbecile who tried really hard to use a lot of big words but it came out as incoherent nonsense. You could tell he was really off after that very brief meeting on my porch. Glad they caught the guy. >


rambling imbecile who tried really hard to use a lot of big words but it came out as incoherent nonsense. You could tell he was really off

Disturbingly, that describes a lot of average, everyday Republicans. >

On the card he handed out, this was one of his position statements. It should give you an idea how ridiculous he sounded.
“Generate high-productivity trends in improvements of employment with the accompanying intention to increase the physical-economic productivity, and the standard of living of the persons and households of New Mexico.” >

I think the clinical lay-term for that is “word salad” and my indicate certain underlying maladies >

Word salad, word vomit, verbal diarrhea...definitely says something about the guy...and the 300+ people who voted for him w/o reading a dang thing about this clown. >

Look, my uncle… >

This absolute loser apparently orchestrated these crimes—and hired other men to perform them—because he was convinced that he had lost his election last November due to fraud.
He lost 74% to 26% to a 25-year incumbent in an overwhelmingly Democratic Albuquerque district.
This man is as stupid as he is violent as he is, existentially, a failure.
He was also a militant supporter of Donald Trump. Multiple flags hanging inside of his home. And he compared his own lopsided loss to Trump's.
If this literal loser is not the poster child of what happens when a political party engages in stochastic terrorism to gin up its base and sate the ego of its defeated leader, I don't know who is. >

They really believe in the "silent majority" and any election lost is clearly just voter fraud. Lost by 50 percentage points? Clearly rigged! >

Well there is legitimate voter fraud that occurs. But it always seems to be on the republican side. I remember watching a documentary  I think it was a Micheal Moore one but not sure...talking about how a guy who was setting up a voting location and asked the tech guy if he could make all of the votes go to the republican.
He Didn't offer any money or anything...he asked the techs political stance first, and after the guy said republican, he then asked...and assumed he would be down because he was in the same team. No remorse, no worry about legal implications...just assumed the tech would go through with it because they were on the same "team". >

It's not always a Republican, but the vast majority of the time it is. >

I've only heard of Republicans but I don't doubt it. Both sides are extremely corrupt and bought out by the same big corporations. Whoever wins in the end, the people lose.
Would be nice if we could remove money from politics and actually charge people with the vast amounts of theft that occurs at the highest levels.
Edit example of voter fraud for you dear democrats who are so deeply indoctrinated you couldn't possibly Google anything >

From what I've seen, the voter fraud isn't orchestrated by the party. (Implicitly encouraged, maybe, if constant empty accusations of the other side doing it counts as encouragement.) It's not organized at all.
It's just individual people doing it, on such a small scale as to be meaningless. Not at all like what Republicans are constantly alleging. >

You realize Anonymous isn’t an organization right? Anonymous doesn’t do anything and they don’t “take a loss” because Anonymous is no one. It’s a Hacker handle used by dozens if not hundreds of people who don’t know anything about eachother and most of whom have never communicated with any of the others that use that name. Beyond that though this is some next level tinfoil hat shit you’re talking about here. >

It's not a purely entropic entity. Sometimes, things happen. >

A former Republican candidate for the New Mexico House of Representatives was arrested Monday for allegedly organizing men to shoot at the homes of Democrats in the state, police announced.
FFS.. >

Will Fox News be covering this back to back like they would if the roles were reversed? >

It's unreal how suddenly many of my conservative friends suddenly give a fuck about secure document storage.
Oceania has always been at war with East Asia. >

And yet, at the same time, I'll bet they think Trump totally was justified in keeping those classified documents and the mean old FBI just had to ask nicely for them back. (Ignoring that he was asked nicely for quite some time, turned over some documents, insisted that nothing else remained, and then sued after the raid to have all the documents - including the classified ones - returned to him, calling them his property.) >

The argument I've seen is that the Trump docs were OK because he declassified them. It is insane because:

No, he didn't.
Would they think the Biden docs were ok if he said he declassified them? Like, he could even do that shit right now. Any time he sees somebody shuffling through papers he can simply scream "I declare DECLASSIFICATION!" as if he is some Trump / Michael Scott hybrid.
Even if the docs were declassified, they don't belong to the former president. They belong to the country. The best argument you could make is that they belong in the archives of your presidential library instead of sitting in a different national archives facility. >

The most important issue with some of the Trump docs has nothing to do with whether they were declassified or not. They contained nuclear secrets and those docs are covered by a completely different set of laws and regulations for handling them and the classification level is irrelevant. They cannot ever leave controlled locations and they did. >

I have run into conservative after conservative insisting we're all ridiculous for even thinking a crime is possible, because no one can prove he had malicious intent.
It's hard to be polite about responding to that, but I try, because he stumbled into one of the few crimes where simple possession is a death penalty offense, you stupid fuckers. >

They absolutely can prove malicious intent. He was given the opportunity to return the US material multiple times. His attorneys swore he had returned it all.
But he hadn't, and lied about it.
 malicious intent. This proves intent, and adds another charge of obstruction.
Trump should spend the rest of his days in Levenworth. We shall see how this pans out. I don't have my hopes up. >

Well... I figured deranged MAGA fanatic, but I didn't think actual GOP candidate. >

We're approaching the Venn diagram singularity >

It was always a single circle. You were just drunk. >

and I still am! >

This guys Twitter account is a treasure trove of right wing extremism.
And yes, he was at the J6 treason party.
Screenshots in case his Twitter account is deleted while his attorney draws a defense. >

"I lost that phone..." Yeah i bet you did...right after you saw the law wasn't on your side and the FBI was looking to build cases against people who were there. >

"We are all domestic terrorists" might not be as good of a slogan as conservatives first imagined. >

It's a fantastic slogan. It's as honest as they've ever been about their ideology. >

Voter fraud? Republican
Tax evasion? Republican
Needs to register as a sex offender? Republican
Shoot at your rivals because you fail and suck at life? Guess