>

Meanwhile: Steven Miller rubs hands in anticipation of his chance…
Clarence and Ginni Thomas’s hard-right ideology is bad enough. But to impose that vision on American democracy while openly flouting its rules shows contempt for the political system they claim to be saving, writes Michael Tomasky. >

What's even worse is that we see this obvious conflict of interest, where Clarence doesn't even recuse himself from cases directly involving Ginny.. if they can't be trusted to do the bare minimum to avoid appearance of impropriety, how can we trust them to make decisions that would uphold democracy? >

Clarence Thomas needs to be removed immediately from the supreme Court justices. >

His wife was involved in planning and organizing of coup attempt >

She should be tried for treason. >

Look up treason in the US code.  Ginni Thomas isn't guilty of treason by any stretch, but she's certainly guilty of many of the charges Trump was referred on. >

And proving that no government position in a democracy should ever have a lifetime appointment >

It only made sense when we had few people even qualified to hold those positions back in the ye'old days. >

That's not the reason.  The reason is the theory of consistency of the judiciary and attempting to remove politics of the moment from the court of last resort.  It is a very flawed system, but it's the best we could come up with. >

Can these old people that a screwing up America just die already?