>

Not even close. Also: It's 1.6 million km away rather than the couple hundred you would fly a low Earth orbit satellite. It would also only see the dark side of Earth due to the position it's in. Plus it only sees in infrared not visible light. So that's 2 more reasons for no.
But even only looking at the angular resolution, it's far too small the see details at cm scale from orbit.
I love a "this you"? >

If South Korea really wanted to troll, they’d casually announce new long-range precision missiles immediately. But North Korea would get angry, the ocean would be in danger >

Sadly this pic alone might get the ocean into some trouble ;-; >

What if this is just an elaborate hoax by the Kim regime to kill whales because they hate them >

But that's not some military satelite quality. That's not even Google Earth quality...
I bet on the actual images that they won't reveal you could tell people's faces apart if not more. >

The SR-71's onboard camera could read a car license plate from 85,000ft. That was in the 1960s. >

And the absolute lowest you can fly a satellite is about 6 times that far away, not to mention it having to be a lot smaller and lighter than an SR-71. It's easy to do the math on what mirror size you would need to distinguish faces from orbit, and it's 20+ meters. There is no rocket that can launch that currently. >


There is no rocket that can launch that currently.

James Webb says hi >

JWST mirror is 6.5 meters. You need 4x bigger at minimum. >

So you're telling me that if we turned the JWST towards us it wouldnt be detailed enough to distinguish faces?