>

TLDR; A list of crimes we’re all well aware of. Most of which he admitted to himself already via Twitter or on TV.
I’d say the larger mystery is why this dumb orange chode still walks free.
“According to testimony received by the Select Committee, the only advisor present who supported President Trump’s inclination to declare victory was Rudolph Giuliani, who appeared to be inebriated.”
Lmao what a shit show >

Rudi always appears to be inebriated. >

I don’t care that his psycho followers will call it all lies. I just want there to be consequences for his actions, and for his cronies as well >

Arrest and charge. Deal with any and all consequences (complaints and riots) as part of the process. >

We need to stop treating their threats of violence as reasons not to push harder.
They have already been violent for years. They will be violent whether Trump gets arrested or not.
Punish Trump, all of his cronies, and all of his violent proto-fascist supporters. Appeasement and complacency never should have been an option. >

This is actually a riveting read. Holy crap, page 20 ... they have an actual photo of the Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference ... hahhahhaa >

Still cant believe that actually happened, feels like something out of a dream. Though to be fair all four years of his presidency felt like a nightmare. >

That whole election felt like a series finale. >

Curb Your Democracy >

The Far Right Wing >

Sure does validate the decision to get rid of the TD subreddit, but clearly it didn't change much. >

Because the fucking cowards waited YEARS to get rid of it.
Spez needed all the “valuable discussion” he could get while he stocked his doomsday bunker. >

Spez? You mean Steve 'I would own slaves' Hoffmann? >

The most unintentionally funny thing I've ever read is spez saying in a post apocalyptic world he thinks he would be a leader and being serious.
Spez is like the nerdiest guy I have ever seen, the only thing he is going to be in a post apocalyptic world is an appetizer. >

He's an amuse-bouche if I've ever seen one. >

amuse-douche more like >

Le applause >

l’applause >

Big fan of this recommendation:

5. National Special Security Event. 
Until January 6th, 2021, the joint session of Congress for counting electoral votes was not understood to pose the same types of security risks as other major events on Capitol Hill. Both the inaugural and the State of theUnion have long been designated as National Special Security Events, requiring specific security measures and significant advance planning andpreparation. Given what occurred in 2021, Congress and the Executive Branch should work together to designate the joint session of Congress occurring on January 6th as a National Special Security Event.

I feel like this alone would raise the bar quite a bit and should be uncontroversial. >

Any joint session should have an extra level of security. We just had two morons rush the metal detectors while Zelenkskyy and the entire Congress (including VP) were in the room. How the fuck was that considered acceptable on a National Security level? >

Seeing how those morons are part of congress I souks feel better if they were banned from the building for putting coworkers at risk. >

I'd accept them meeting the same fate as any OTHER idiot who forces their way past an ARMED security checkpoint.  If we're not going to kick the insurrectionists out, and we're not going to have consequences when they break the rules, what good is the security detail?  There isn't a version of the January 6th narrative that doesn't mention a LOT of names still in the house, still proudly strutting past guards, knowing they're untouchable, because treating them like criminals would be too p0liTiCaL. >

I'd like to see the bonking stick used on them. I don't know if Congress has one or if only one house has one, but it's normal for a legislative body to have a ceremonial bonking stick for keeping order. usually, they're never used. but I feel like this merits a good bonking. 
unfortunately, it's not possible to arrest a sitting Congress member while Congress is in session. it's quite illegal. but I bet there's someone in at least one of the houses with a bonking stick and the authority to remove people. so that should've happened.
edit: the bonking stick is real. it's only for the house, but it's been used 6 times. the bonking stick is presented to indicate a call to order, and ignoring the bonking stick is cause for arrest per House rules. however, the bonking stick has never been used to hit anyone. this, in my opinion, is a tragedy. >

Good news!  The House has an actual weapon, which you have seen an image of, Nancy Pelosi has a broach she wears on special occasions made in its image.  The Senate's isn't really a weapon, but it could be used that way I suppose.
The fun one is officially in the possession of the House Sergeant at Arms, its called the Mace of the Republic.
The Senate's Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the United States Senate also keeps the Senate Gavel(s), while not as fun as the mace, the current gavel is a solid piece of marble in the shape of an hourglass.  The retired ones... well, the first was cracked by then Vice President Nixon while in a "heated" session, despite the silver end caps put on it to prevent further damage.  The second was quietly retired sometime in the late twenty teens when they realized ivory (gifted by the Republic of India) was probably a bit of a PR hit waiting to happen. >


Recommendation 4:  Congressional committees should continue to evaluate policies of media companies that have had the effect of radicalizing their consumers, including by provoking people to attack their own country.

Golly gee, I wonder which one. >

Guarantee you Republicans are currently working to flip this ‘provoking people to attack their own country’ bit in order to point the finger at Antifa and just about any media outlet they feel like.
There’s no such thing as ‘objectively bad behavior’ with them. Everything is subjective. >

At this point I'd start requiring there be a disclaimer on every show. I know you can't take them off the air because "censorship" but you can require they past big letters at the top of "not factual information" and at this point I think it's pretty necessary. The Fox News rhetoric is literally ruining people's lives at this point if they're part of whatever group they've decided to stamp out on their hate bingo card >

like that would dissuade any of their viewers. They don't tune in for factual information, they tune in to be told what they want to hear. >

The ones who are that far gone need to be 51-50'd and given involuntary psychological treatment. >

Rather than fret about whether Trump and his cronies will get prosecuted (something of which  Congress has no control over), I would simply like to applaud the Committee for doing such a great job with their mandated purpose.  The Hearings were extremely well done, the evidence/testimony damning, and it all was fairly digestible to the average American.
Regardless of any immediate effect on the electorate, this report is a record for our history.  For the first time, we did not have a peaceful transfer of power, and the Committee did a tremendous job documenting and exposing the details and various plots that lead up to Jan 6th.  And, though the GOP will claim otherwise, this was a bipartisan project, where most of the evidence and testimony came from Republicans.   
So, I commend them - the Representatives and all their staff who have been working tirelessly to disseminate all their evidence, and finish this report by the end of this Congress - for providing what will likely be the most comprehensive, and exhaustive examination of the events leading up to, and including the January 6th Insurrection. >

Hear hear!
They really did do a great job. >

Click here for full report (845 pages) >

What’s up with the ‘December 00, 2022’?! >

That will get fixed in the Select Committee's Final Final Report (v2). >

NEVER name your file “FINAL”. Rookie mistake. Hahaha >

jan6reportfinalfinalreal.docx >

jan6reportfinalfinalrealv3-usethisone!!!.docx >

tl:dr Trump tried to overthrow the United States of America. >

They're always quiet about stuff like this. Mods probably delete posts like this. >

Because we all know it's those left-wing extremists behind this /s >

"This Report supplies an immense volume of information and testimony
assembled through the Select Committee’s investigation, including information obtained following litigation in Federal district and appellate courts, as
well as in the U.S. Supreme Court. Based upon this assembled evidence, the
Committee has reached a series of specific findings, including the following:


Beginning election night and continuing through January 6th and
thereafter, Donald Trump purposely disseminated false allegations of
fraud related to the 2020 Presidential election in order to aid his effort
to overturn the election and for purposes of soliciting contributions.
These false claims provoked his supporters to violence on January 6th.


Knowing that he and his supporters had lost dozens of election lawsuits, and despite his own senior advisors refuting his election fraud
claims and urging him to concede his election loss, Donald Trump
refused to accept the lawful result of the 2020 election. Rather than
honor his constitutional obligation to “take Care that the Laws be
faithfully executed,” President Trump instead plotted to overturn the
election outcome.


Despite knowing that such an action would be illegal, and that no
State had or would submit an altered electoral slate, Donald Trump
corruptly pressured Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to count
electoral votes during Congress’s joint session on January 6th.


Donald Trump sought to corrupt the U.S. Department of Justice by
attempting to enlist Department officials to make purposely false
statements and thereby aid his effort to overturn the Presidential
election. After that effort failed, Donald Trump offered the position of
Acting Attorney General to Jeff Clark knowing that Clark intended to
disseminate false information aimed at overturning the election.


Without any evidentiary basis and contrary to State and Federal law,
Donald Trump unlawfully pressured State officials and legislators to
change the results of the election in their States.


Donald Trump oversaw an effort to obtain and transmit false electoral
certificates to Congress and the National Archives.


Donald Trump pressured Members of Congress to object to valid
slates of electors from several States.


Donald Trump purposely verified false information filed in Federal
court.


Based on false allegations that the election was stolen, Donald Trump
summoned tens of thousands of supporters to Washington for January 6th. Although these supporters were angry and some were armed,
Donald Trump instructed them to march to the Capitol on January 6th
to “take back” their country.


Knowing that a violent attack on the Capitol was underway and
knowing that his words would incite further violence, Donald Trump
purposely sent a social media message publicly condemning Vice
President Pence at 2:24 p.m. on January 6th.


Knowing that violence was underway at the Capitol, and despite his
duty to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed, Donald Trump
refused repeated requests over a multiple hour period that he instruct
his violent supporters to disperse and leave the Capitol, and instead
watched the violent attack unfold on television. This failure to act
perpetuated the violence at the Capitol and obstructed Congress’s
proceeding to count electoral votes.


Each of these actions by Donald Trump was taken in support of a
multi-part conspiracy to overturn the lawful results of the 2020
Presidential election.


The intelligence community and law enforcement agencies did successfully detect the planning for potential violence on January 6th,
including planning specifically by the Proud Boys and Oath Keeper
militia groups who ultimately led the attack on the Capitol. As January
6th approached, the intelligence specifically identified the potential
for violence at the U.S. Capitol. This intelligence was shared within the
executive branch, including with the Secret Service and the President’s National Security Council.


Intelligence gathered in advance of January 6th did not support a
conclusion that Antifa or other left-wing groups would likely engage
in a violent counter-demonstration, or attack Trump supporters on
January 6th. Indeed, intelligence from January 5th indicated that
some left-wing groups were instructing their members to “stay at
home” and not attend on January 6th.20 Ultimately, none of these
groups was involved to any material extent with the attack on the
Capitol on January 6th.


Neither the intelligence community nor law enforcement obtained
intelligence in advance of January 6th on the full extent of the ongoing planning by President Trump, John Eastman, Rudolph Giuliani
and their associates to overturn the certified election results. Such
agencies apparently did not (and potentially could not) anticipate the
provocation President Trump would offer the crowd in his Ellipse
speech, that President Trump would “spontaneously” instruct the
crowd to march to the Capitol, that President Trump would exacerbate
the violent riot by sending his 2:24 p.m. tweet condemning Vice
President Pence, or the full scale of the violence and lawlessness that
would ensue. Nor did law enforcement anticipate that President
Trump would refuse to direct his supporters to leave the Capitol once
violence began. No intelligence community advance analysis predicted exactly how President Trump would behave; no such analysis
recognized the full scale and extent of the threat to the Capitol on
January 6th.


Hundreds of Capitol and DC Metropolitan police officers performed
their duties bravely on January 6th, and America owes those individuals immense gratitude for their courage in the defense of Congress
and our Constitution. Without their bravery, January 6th would have
been far worse. Although certain members of the Capitol Police leadership regarded their approach to January 6th as “all hands on deck,”
the Capitol Police leadership did not have sufficient assets in place to
address the violent and lawless crowd.21 Capitol Police leadership did
not anticipate the scale of the violence that would ensue after President Trump instructed tens of thousands of his supporters in the
Ellipse crowd to march to the Capitol, and then tweeted at 2:24 p.m.
Although Chief Steven Sund raised the idea of National Guard support,
the Capitol Police Board did not request Guard assistance prior to
January 6th. The Metropolitan Police took an even more proactive
approach to January 6th, and deployed roughly 800 officers, including
responding to the emergency calls for help at the Capitol. Rioters still
managed to break their line in certain locations, when the crowd
surged forward in the immediate aftermath of Donald Trump’s 2:24
p.m. tweet. The Department of Justice readied a group of Federal
agents at Quantico and in the District of Columbia, anticipating that
January 6th could become violent, and then deployed those agents
once it became clear that police at the Capitol were overwhelmed.
Agents from the Department of Homeland Security were also
deployed to assist.

President Trump had authority and responsibility to direct deployment of the National Guard in the District of Columbia, but never gave
any order to deploy the National Guard on January 6th or on any other
day. Nor did he instruct any Federal law enforcement agency to assist.
Because the authority to deploy the National Guard had been delegated to the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense could,
and ultimately did deploy the Guard. Although evidence identifies a
likely miscommunication between members of the civilian leadership
in the Department of Defense impacting the timing of deployment,
the Committee has found no evidence that the Department of Defense
intentionally delayed deployment of the National Guard. The Select
Committee recognizes that some at the Department had genuine
concerns, counseling caution, that President Trump might give an
illegal order to use the military in support of his efforts to overturn
the election." >

Lock. Him. Up. >

But the emails.... >

But Benghazi.... >

What about Hunter's laptop, though? >

Any day now… >

And how about Biden not being tough on crime? /s
Only republicans execute the full laws of the banana republic of cheetos /s >

And what about Obama and his disgraceful dijon mustard? >

And don't forget the Twitter files! >

Merry Christmas, fuckin traitor. ❤️ >

Happy cake day. >

Ya filthy animal. >

And a happy New year >

You was here. And you was smoochin’ wit my bruddah! >

The conclusion here is the completeness of the argument. There is absolutely no doubt that Trump is a criminal. Time to prosecute. >

Also:
Seditious traitor, treasonous enemy of the constitution, insurrectionist, liar, authoritarian, fascist, raPist, raCist, gaslighting conman, cult leader, and shitbag fucking asshole who fucked kids with Epstein >

Don't forget $99 NFT salesman >

Ah, yes. The worst of his crimes /s >

Money laundering is pretty bad if you ask me. >

The fuckin' summary is 190 pages! LOL. >

The full one is 845 pages... >

But are there pictures and graphs? >

And 27 8x10 glossy photographs with a paragraph on the back of each one? >


And the judge walked in sat down with a seeing eye dog, and he sat down, we sat down. Obie looked at the seeing eye dog, and then at the twenty seven eight-by-ten color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one, and looked at the seeing eye dog. 
And then at twenty seven eight-by-ten color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one and began to cry, 'cause Obie came to the realization that it was a typical case of American blind justice, and there wasn't nothing he could do about it, and the judge wasn't going to look at the twenty seven eight-by-ten color glossy pictures with the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was to be used as evidence against us. And we was fined fifty dollars and had to pick up the garbage in the snow, but that's not what I came to tell you about.
Came to talk about the draft. >


In the Committee’s hearings, we presented evidence of what ultimately became a multi-part plan to overturn the 2020 Presidential election. That evidence has led to an overriding and straight forward conclusion: the central cause of January 6th was one man, former President Donald Trump, whom many others followed. None of the events of January 6th would have happened without him. >

How long before this story is posted on foxnews.com and you have to scroll past 5 Hunter Biden stories, 8 "our border is under siege" opinion pieces, etc... to find a tiny little thumbnail to click? >

You missed 3 "War on Xmas" stories >

Happy holidays! >

Merry Xmas! >

Username does NOT check out >

To the surprise of no one, this is being blocked/censored/deleted on /r/conservative, the bastion of free speech and anti-cancel culture. >

It'll appear there in a few days when they have their angle of attack. They need to hang around for a few days for their entertainment outlets to tell them that angle. >

Yup. The GOP already said they have a “100 page rebuttal” ready. I’m sure it’s a wet fart that the loons will run with and say it’s a smoking gun, just like they did the “tWiTtEr FiLeS” all while informing the real problem. >

Is it that bullshit document that Jim Jordan is touting? Ya that was already shown to be basically 10 pages long with a bunch of repeating pages or some such nonsense for the other 100. It’s what you think it is. A dumb performative prop. >

Now complete the course of justice, please. >

Jack Smith has entered the game >

Here is the direct link to the report, so you don’t have to go through a news site to read it. >

We need accountability. Arrest that worthless pos. He should already be in jail. Him and his criminal family. >

Man, Truth Social is going to blow up tomorrow morning…. If it hasn’t already. >

“Hunter Biden’s penis released a libelous report about me yesterday from his underground sex dungeon. Used a lot of paper, so sad, Hunter Biden and his meat hammer must be stopped.” >

(The hammer is his penis) >

Arrest Trump during him having Christmas dinner. >

McDonald's >

What else would it be? >

I'm picturing a pile of quarter pounders in the shape of a Christmas tree as the centerpiece of their table. >

TRE45ON >

Good one. Up there with Brokémon Cards >

Fat in the Hat >

Space Karen.  Oh wait, that's Elon. >

Page 12:

President Trump also took consequential actions reflecting his understanding that he would be leaving office on January 20th. For example, President Trump personally signed a Memorandum and Order instructing his Department of Defense to withdraw all military forces from Somalia by December 31, 2020, and from Afghanistan by January 15, 2021.
General Keith Kellogg (ret.), who had been appointed by President Trump as Chief of Staff for the National Security Council and was Vice President Pence’s National Security Advisor on January 6th, told the Select Committee that “[a]n immediate departure that that memo said would have been catastrophic. It’s the same thing what President Biden went through. It would have been a debacle.”

The slimy motherfucker knew what would happen, and he did it anyway. He did it to fuck the incoming President. He did it out of spite. >

Everything that fucker does is out of spite.
Everything. >

This is history, folks. Our kid’s kid’s will read these words in their US History classes.  
This will be Trump’s legacy >


Our kid’s kid’s will read these words in their US History classes.

Not if they live in a Red state. >

Both because it won't be taught, and red state kids can't read good. >

They could really use a Derek Zoolander center for kids who can't read good and who wanna learn to do other stuff good too >

What is this, a 20 year old reference for ants!? >

Alright America, it's time to show your mettle. >


Alright America, it's time to show your mettle.

Buddy, this report is 800+ pages. 99% of America will never make it into the double digits. >

They will read Reddit comments for the important bit though >

99% of America isn't on Reddit >

We did it Reddit!
We are the 1% >

So does that mean after this years recap we’re all in the top 1% of the top 1%? Good work boys. >

I'll tell you... while I may vehemently disagree with Liz Cheney's or Adam Kinzinger's politics, they have my complete respect for standing alone for their beliefs.  Sure, as some have pointed out, all they did was the right thing, but when they were the only ones in their group that had the guts to do the right thing, that must be acknowledged. >

You are right, but how sad is it that they deserve praise for not betraying their duty to uphold the Constitution.  That should not be a mark of excellence.  It should be a bare minimum. >

Just a little lite reading while being polar bombed. >

A little lite reading about a little lite treason >

A gift for the holiday season? >

An essay I published is cited in the report! I was not expecting this, lol... >

OP, just for your own sake, considering the current political climate,  don't doxx yourself. Wait for things to cool down so random internet crazies don't try to take their grievances out on you. >

Just so everyone knows, commie socialist, ImpossibleAdz, lives at 123 fake street, Madeupburg, North Dakota. >

80085 Q Way Winchestertonfieldville, IA 50542 >

P. Sherman, 42 Wallaby Way, Sydney >

Mmm that would be so nice right now >

if trump could read he'd be very upset >

melania is probably gonna have a time reading it to him in so much as he will throw a tantrum >

Page 271, flat out calls January 6th an insurrection. >

Cannot wait for charges 
Happy holidays everyone >

We as Americans that follow political news have all seen other countries indict and sometimes convict corrupt politicians up to (and including) their prime minister/chancellor/president/whatever. Israel and Italy come to mind. Argentina, Brazil, and Chile too. These nations know that failure to prosecute a criminal for their crimes, especially for someone charged to uphold the law and the constitution (both within America and without) will lead to corruption stacked on top of corruption. 
In our case, it was about enrichment. We had one special loser who was never told “no” see his opportunity to be president as a way to further enrich his interests whether it was for him, his children, or his benefactors (I still wouldn’t put it past Putin to have been one as I’m sure a lot of you would agree). You could see it in many forms: the cost of running pardons through your kids, the secret service being charged money at trump hotels when they had no other options, the trump hotel in DC, the super PACs with clauses on how money is to be distributed (with the largest percentage going to TFG to use as he sees fit), and of course the automatic autopay his campaign site required (and maybe even more so since). 
It’s getting harder and harder (with all the information available) to take people who back the cheddar colored c-word seriously. With this much info and the walls closing in, they still believe that thousands upon thousands of Americans were able to pull off an elaborate scheme to cheat one person out of the presidency and not a single leak made it out to the NYT, WaPo, or any other publication at all? Shit, the Supreme Court (I would argue one of the hardest places to get people to leak) couldn’t even stop someone (Alito?) from revealing information about a decision in a pending case (not once, but twice). 
But yeah, fraud? The only fraud was the one that was in the white house from January 2017 until January 2021. >

Just did a keyword search. 4,207 "Trump"s. That's a lot of Trumps! >

55 Fucks. Not quite a fuck ton, but at least it's a fuck pile. >

It's a decent fuck load at least. >

So…..bottom line….can all of this prevent him from running in 2024?  I’m so tired of him doing stupid shit and it just gets swept under the rug. >

Only in the limited circumstance that he is charged and convicted of one of the 4 charges that were recommended: insurrection.  That one includes a provision barring someone from running for office, if convicted.  That's probably the hardest charge to make stick, because there is so little case law on which to base it, and it is possible to challenge the constitutionality of the barring from presidential candidacy in court (the argument would probably be that the constitution specifies the qualifications for president, and lack of an insurrection charge isn't one of them).
Other than that, merely being charged and convicted of a crime does not prevent you from running for President.  In fact, historically there have been multiple people who campaigned from prison. >

The barring is also in the Constitution.  14th Amendment:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. >

Donald Trump belongs in the deepest, darkest, coldest hole the American prison system has to offer and nothing less. >

Im still not over the fact that our former president schemed to literally overthrow the government after weeks of threatening anyone he could find. He deserves to rot in jail for this for real. Get it done DOJ. >


According to testimony received by the Select Committee, the only advisor present who supported President Trump’s inclination to declare victory was Rudolph Giuliani, who appeared to be inebriated.

LMAO >

Merrick Garland, the fate of democracy is in your hands. Do the right thing, regardless of politics. >

If no one is held accountable after this, and I’m not talking like some low level person, I mean serious accountability….then it only so proves our country is just rubber stamped a democracy and we truly live in a feudal society. >

It's treason, then.
What was the punishment for treason, again? >

Although it's treason in simple American english, under the law it's sedition and seditious conspiracy. 

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States...
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. >

lmao not a single mention of this on the Fox News website. >

Why would they report on this when Hunter Biden’s laptop is invading the southern border and making trans children in the basement at Disneyland?!!
Priorities people! >

Hard to spin it really. >

“The committee on Monday released a 160-page summary with an overview of its findings, which identified former President Donald Trump as the "central cause" of the Jan. 6 attack.” >

Lock him up. >

Lol:

2:53 p.m. from Donald Trump, Jr.: “He’s got to condem [sic] this shit. Asap. The captiol [sic] police tweet is not enough.” >

So to sum up, the attempt coup & riot of the 6th would not have happened at all or at the scale if Donny 2 Scoops hadn’t encouraged & escalated as he did. 
Therefor the riot was his fault. The deaths on that day would not have occurred. Causing a fatality in the commission of a crime should be a murder charge. 
Would they have the balls to charge the orange turd after they convict him of this bullshit ? 
I doubt it. But it would be the sweet sweet fuck you nail on his bloated coffin. >

Hey everyone - Let’s watch the Republicans all say this is bullshit. 
They are traitors to the United States. There are NO good Republicans left. 
Do not ever forget what they did. >

Fox News has literally no mention of any of this. It’s almost funny how bias they are. >

Yup - and sadly, the Republican voters still watch religiously. 
They will never hear a peep about this - just like they don’t remember why Trump was impeached the first time. >

Why did they release it at 10pm? So journalists can read it over the Christmas weekend? >

Their holiday recess begins on December 22nd. One last thing to put out into the media before break. >

Trump's probably looking at airfares to Russia right now. >

Fuck fascists. Send all the GOP that participated to prison for a lengthy sentence. Fascists do not belong in society.
They better see prison time or else I would hope people would protest heavily if they don't. 
Rules should be followed for everyone. Not just the general population >

This part is why the nations so divided: 

The committee investigators describe how Trump campaign and Republican National Committee fundraising pitches containing false claims of a stolen election ultimately raised more than $250 million – but were met internally with some resistance.
Investigators describe three options that were considered for a post-election fundraising appeal by the campaign. One option, that the campaign opted against using because they knew it was false, said that Trump had won. A second unused option said the campaign was waiting on results. Ultimately, according to the committee, the Trump campaign approved a message that Democrats are going to “try to steal the election” that was written before election night.

They knew it was bullshit, but decided to fundraise anyway by accusing the democrats of a crime. >

Just a quick heads up that the GQP is using the December 00, 2022 typo to discredit and deflect. Don't take the bait. >

Only a moron would take that bait. >

Great. Now arrest, charge, try, convict and sentence his ass to Supermax or Guantanamo till the end of time. >

2 years later and only a couple nobody’s facing charges, it’s fucking insane. If it was flipped and democrats tried to do a coup, there would be public hangings in the south. >

Fox News is already trying to deflect and pin Capitol security on Nancy. Gym Jordan saying “this is why they didn’t want us on the committee because they knew we would ask these questions” uh, you’re a fuckin traitor and you were in on this, which is exactly what Liz Cheney said to you that day. Fuck you. And fuck Fox News for perpetrating this shit. Can the FBI investigate these fucks please? >

Not a single one of his supporters give a shit >

It'll just be called fake news >

I was at my parents place earlier, and they had Newsmax on. Any time the January 6 committee was mentioned during a talk show, the panelists would take turns referring to it as a sham, a show trial, a cowardly political move. 
It's as if every right-leaning person has developed a duty to talk like Trump. >

"I don't believe anything in that report" - my Dad. 
I miss my old, less hateful, father.
Fuck you Fox, Newsmax, Limbaugh >

They don’t need the report. Anyone alive and breathing on January 6th knew why it was happening. >

You know what's hidden in plain sight?
Why January 6th? Even if you believed that you had actually won the election, and you wanted to hold a rally to protest the corruption of the election... why that day, when the results were being certified?
For no possible other reason to halt the certification. By definition, that's obstructing an official proceeding. >

That would be a good day just for the symbolism of it. Problem is we're dealing with the same guy who felt "dinner at the White House" and "I ordered a bunch of McDonald's" have the same PR optics, so we can rule that out. >

Ketchup and bronzer are running down someone’s face tonight. >

Y'all better start flooding the fucking streets if this doesn't lead to a prosecution. >

It was either Dan or Tommy on the Pod Save America podcast who said something like "we find it much easier to prosecute crimes that are concealed than ones that are blatantly obvious."
Though said about an earlier Trump crime, it has continued to be a message that is accurate. There are very few more obvious examples of crime than pressuring an election official to "find" the exact number of votes that would allow you to win by 1 vote. >

TL;DR - Trump did it. 
Everyone two years ago: “yeah, we know.” >

Oh boy I can't wait for trump supporters to not actually read this and just believe whatever made up conclusions fox reports about what this report says. >

"The phrase “Stop theSteal” was originally coined in early 2016 by President Trump’s longtime
political advisor, Roger Stone. At the time, Stone alleged first that Candidate Trump’s Republican rivals were attempting to steal Candidate Trump’s nomination. After Trump became the nominee, Stone repurposed the saying to claim that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would steal the presidency. When President Trump won the 2016 election, “Stop the Steal” was rendered moot—and did not become a significant political
movement until President Trump’s defeat on election night in 2020." (page 502) >

Lock him up! Lock him up! >

I know I know, doj still has to do it's due diligence, but I would spontaneously orgasm if I woke up Christmas morning to see Mar a Lago surrounded by feds again. >

It was never “make America great again” it has always been “make Frump great again”  his worshipers are the biggest FOOLS on the planet.  Con Man Don. >

I wonder how bad this is going to be >

“Can you detail Donald Trump’s involvement and what charges he may be guilty of?”
The report details how President Donald Trump’s words and actions leading up to the attack likely incited the violence, and based on those findings it calls for further investigation into his involvement. It specifically mentions possible charges of sedition and incitement of insurrection, as well as violations of federal election law, since some of the rioters were heard calling for disrupting the certification process of the electoral college. >

“What words? What actions?”
The report states that President Trump's words included encouraging his supporters to "fight like hell" and telling them to march on the Capitol and make their voices heard. His actions include not condemning the violence or calling for it to end and his refusal to mobilize federal law enforcement in an effort to protect the Capitol before, during, and after the attack.
“Tell me more. Be specific.”
President Trump's words were seen as a call to action as hundreds of his supporters stormed the Capitol in what has been characterized as an insurrection. His refusal to condemn the violence explicitly or call for it to end was seen by many as complicit in stoking the flames of insurgency, and the lack of federal response was thought to have allowed the attack to progress and cause damage. He is also accused of violating federal election law by encouraging certain members of Congress to reject the election results, thereby attempting to disrupt the certification process. >

I assume your questions are phrased that way so the A.I can understand you better.
But feels like you're menacingly interrogating it lmao. >

Donald Trump is a traitor who attempted to supplant our Democracy. Will he be punished? Probably not. >

"Not only did President Trump lie to his supporters about the election,
but he also ripped them off." >

And they're proud to have been reamed by him >


But when pressed by committee investigators, she could not provide any instances of the president discussing whether or not he did the right thing on January 6 or speaking about those who were injured or died that day.

This particular "I don't recall" is double bladed. Because either Ivanka does recall and is lying, indicates his feelings about the victims of that day are far worse (e.g. "they know what they signed up for"), or he truly has never remarked on his culpability, which oozes a level of narcissism I have trouble imagining. >

/r/Conservative
crickets >

Head over to Conservative sub and watch them dismiss it all as a witch hunt >

Go get this printed and bound and give it to your Republican family members for christmas >

If no accountability is met after all of this evidence I'm seriously considering changing my D&D alignment from lawful neutral to chaotic good. >

America has a chance to take back a big piece of itself here. I hope it happens. >

Of course Trump would have a lawyer named Cheesebro >

"At this point the only acceptable option and the bare minimum for the preservation of our democracy, is the immediate removal and prosecution for Donald Trump for sedition and the expulsion of anyone who aided him in this coup."  - Seth Meyers ( A Closer Look Jan 11, 2021)
Everyone mentioned by Seth as aiding in the coup still has their jobs in congress and on Fox news. The January 6th committee has wrapped up with a criminal referral for Trump, so "immediate removal" never happened to anyone. We must remember every turncoat that faced a camera to lecture us on "turning down the volume" or other such inane and transparent key jangling. These spineless vermin must be removed from office, and their entire party must go the way of the Whig. Some think the American people have the memory of a mosquito, but many concurred with Seth's quote above when it aired, and hope that justice may still be served. Criminals belong in prison.