>

I disagree. 
The more resources they pour into that useless coal rolling piece of shit the better. >!i know it doesn’t burn actual coal!<
Big dreams of being a submarine. You can do it, buddy. >

The floating dock used to service the carrier already sunk a few years ago, I'm sure the ship is next. >

That aircraft carrier is nothing but a floating dock anyway. Did Xzibit set this up? Yo dog! I heard you like floating docks so I put a floating dock on your floating dock!
Seriously: it only moves when towed by tugboats, which are basically sea tractors. >

I can’t help but laugh at the image in my head of a Ukrainian farmer ~~stealing~~ towing the dock with a sea tractor. >

You laugh, but it might just happen! Not because they’re afraid of the military threat that piece of shit represents, but the long-term environmental impact of it getting anywhere near your own country’s aquatic ecosystem. That aircraft carrier is nothing more than a floating superfund site. >

Imagine Ukrainian fishing boats bringing in their big "catch" >

Wouldn’t be the first time a Russian fleet lost to fishing boats. >

Goddamn it Kamchatka >

Aurora shivers in her moorings at the thought of her own navy firing anything near her. >

Again? >

Wait, OP's article says the ship has been in dry dock undergoing repairs since 2018. So it's caught on fire twice while in dry dock? >

The dry dock also sank.

In November 2018, it was damaged by a falling 70-ton crane from the floating dry dock PD-50 and a fire that killed two during the refit. The dry dock, which sank due to a power outage while holding Admiral Kuznetsov, was vital to repairing the carrier, which changed its estimated return to service to 2022 or later. >

Now I'm imagining Putin being in that scene from Monty Python and the Quest for the Holy Grail.   

We built an aircraft carrier and it caught on fire.   
We put it in dry dock for repairs and it caught fire again and the dock sank.   
But the next time we fix it.... >

You fucker I typed my reply out all smug, hit submit and then saw yours. >

Well you see the fronts not supposed to fall off. >

Well what happened? >

Well the front fell off in this case, by all means, but it's very unusual. >

Why did the front fall off? >

well, a wave hit it. >

Again? What is thing made from? Those novelty candles that won't blow out? >

Cardboard or cardboard derivatives.
They're lucky the front hasn't fallen off. >

What’s the minimum crew requirement? >

Uh, one I suppose? >

So what do you do to protect the environment in cases like this? >

Well it was towed outside the environment. >

There’s nothing out there. All there is is sea and birds and fish. And 20,000 tons of crude oil. And a fire. And the part of the ship that the front fell off. But there’s nothing else out there. It's just a complete void. >

Can you call a cab?
I thought you arrived in a government car
Well I did but the front fell off. >

Its okay, it was overdue to do this again >

Is normal, shows she is fiery and passionate about war >

I disagree. She, like so many of her smaller siblings in the Russian Navy, yearn to explore the bottom of the sea >

It’s pining for the ^(bottom of the) fjords >

Let's hope it's soon to be an ex-aircraft carrier.