>

Well you’re making the assumption that brute strength is the biggest advantage one can have, which is not true. If you’d like to know the ways women excel, I would look at the book The Better Half. We’ve always been a patriarchal society. So the fact that we’ve built societies and sports that cater to the areas that men excel rather than women does not make men superior, it just means that society was built for them. Invisible Women is a book that can teach you more about the ways society forgets women. 
Your answer to this question is interesting, but wouldn’t an easier answer be a society that specifically arms women but not men be easier than genetic modification? Women commit very little gun violence, or violence in general. If women could be armed and men could not, you would solve a lot of problems all at once. Gun violence would be near zero, and men would be at a disadvantage when considering physical violence against women. Fists to a gun fight and all that.
To be clear, this isn’t something I would support exactly. I think society should just change. I think men should be raised differently and violence against any living thing should be considered zero tolerance in a sane society. It’s just important to understand that, as a woman, I don’t want to be a man. I don’t think men are superior and I don’t envy or desire your strength for myself. I think our differences are to be celebrated. We’ve spent a long time pointing out the ways women are inferior and designing societies that reinforce that false notion. It is time that society was redesigned in a way that supports women’s strengths and allows us to excel. The idea that we need to change to fit a culture that is broken just doesn’t make sense.
/u/ILikeMistborn (OP) has awarded 1 delta(s) in this post.
All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards