>

People use art as a means of expression. It's kind of the core of art. Sometimes a screenwriter just wants to entertain, sometimes not, but in every instance they're purring a piece of themselves and how they view the world into their art.
Honestly,  I think this is starting to becoming a popular opinion.
It think it is fine when done well but most writters don't have the talent to pull it off or do it too much too often. >

God I hope so, so tired of being lectured at via movies. You wanna have a political message in your movie? Fine, do it. But do it like Starship Troopers anti war message, make a decent movie with bits of the message sprinkled about that takes a bit of paying attention >

Ah i also see you are a gentlehuman with immaculate taste in cinematography. 🍷🧐 >

Indubitably 🍷🧐 >

YOU WANNA LIVE FOREVER!? >

Famously, action films have never had any meaningful or significant social commentary.
Starship Troopers, Aliens, Saving Private Ryan, They Live, The Matrix, Jurassic Park, Battle Royale, Upgrade, Robocop, First Blood, any Mad Max film, Terminator films, fucking Die Hard. 
Pretty much every genre, from children's animation to sci-fi cult horror, has had meaningful social commentary in its genre at some point. In fact, the social commentary is more effective when placed into a film's narrative and weaved directly into it.
I think what you dislike is that films with poor writing tend to be bad at doing this weaving, and since production studios want to just push out things for mass consumption, they're getting writers to work overtime, and the product is being made worse by that motive.
The reality is you've always been moralised to. That's not new. If you think it is, that's actually an indicator of the skill of the writers who have being doing it. 
Is a film like Black Adam going to be as good at conveying a message as All Quiet on the Western Front? It's not unheard of, but probably not. I can tell you that the one that was doing more of the moralising was much more well received. 
In fact, I'd usually argue that a film without any message is usually pretty boring, save for absurdist films which are very much an acquired taste. >

You have to have done really poorly in English class to be unable to understand that the whole point of media is moralisation.
Like... You can't write a story without themes and ideas that are subjective?
The closest you could come is a pure survival film about a single character in nature, but even then that'd likely be interpretable as a commentary on our modern view of nature as relaxing and fun... >

Right? All media or art contains implicit and explicit value judgments. They are in everything we do. People don’t like hearing about stuff they don’t feel is important. >

I am not sure about this take without an example. 
I will say, I do like when you can see philosophies influence things in a movie. Like, sometimes you can completely miss something if you don’t know context around the person saying it. The speaker can change things sometimes. 
My favorite example of this is the song writer for a lot of music in beauty and the beast. I’m the song where they hunt the beast on beauty in the beast the villagers sing “we don’t like what we don’t understand — in fact, it scares us!” This line on its own is pretty easy to read within the context of the movie, but I think it’s really cool how you get another layer when you recognize the writer of this line was a gay man who societally would have faced a lot of scrutiny in the 80s and 90s especially with the aids pandemic. (Which he did unfortunately pass away from. They dedicated the movie to him in the credits. ) >

Everything Disney does in the past 5 years. >

Lauren Hissrich & Season 2 of the Witcher >

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. >

Show us where the bad movie touched your heart in a way you did not want to be touched. 
Asking artists to not have a point of view is unrealistic and frankly, sounds a little butthurt. >

That’s what writers have always done, though. Hansel and Gretel is a warning about trusting strangers, Pinocchio is about a lying disobedient brat… the list is endless.
All written works have either been about presenting a certain moral, presenting/recording information, or to convince readers on something.
Writers don’t waste their time. If they’re going to tell a story or list something down, there’s going to be a point to it, and that point is called the theme. In fact, writers are taught to put a clear theme in their works 1) so that their work doesn’t get muddled, and 2) so they don’t seem like they’re rambling.
TLDR: this isn’t new- writers have always and always will include morality into their works. >

The  two examples about trusting strangers and a lying disobedient brat feel very different than what I think OP is talking about..
Like the story OP is talking about would be about a POC MtF trans queen who proved to an Arab misogynistic despot that she can belly-dance as good as any female in his harem. >

That isn’t social commentary, it’s bourgeoisie garbage disguised as political empowerment >

Can you give some examples of movies where I can look out for this? >

I'm not sure if it's exactly what OP was talking about, but I really liked some of the philosophies expressed in Everything Everywhere All at Once. It was very pro-kindness and using compassion to solve problems, as well as being ultimately absurdist in it's take on existence and living through life. >

No good deed goes unpunished… >

I'm sorry, I think I'm missing what you mean by this. Which good deed are you referring to? Or are you disagreeing with the idea of using compassion to solve problems? >

I was being cynical. Not serious. >

Sure, but I was being genuine when I said I wasn't sure what you meant by it. Maybe just a lapse on my end. >

No, not really. Your fine. I may want to look at that movie you referenced though. >

It's a neat one. Very creative. >

Where did you see it, Netflix, Amazon Prime? >

Hmm, well I saw it in theaters, but this might help you find it. >

I am a Christian, but I rarely watch Christian movies. They are bad, because they so often out message above story. Modern secular movies are becoming the same; so han fisted with the message that they don't pay attention to the story or characters. The funny thing is, subtlety is usually a way better method of getting a point across. >

Prince of Egypt on top babyyyyyy >

Most of the good Christian movies are Biblical stories. The original material is not so good. >

You mean like the stories from the Hebrew Bible? >

Both Old and New Testament stories >

I think there is a line between good social political commentary and bad social political commentary and it’s typically expressed in the quality of the writing in a movie 
if the movie is really good at making you think and ask complex questions then it’s both good writing and it’s ripe for interesting and engaging discourse over social and political topics while also allowing writers to express themselves and their beliefs and overall create and experience that’s enriching and engaging all round
On the other hand you can have writers who are either overworked or lazy just shoehorning some political or social issues into a peice of media so they can hide from actual criticism of their shite work then you don’t only have bad writing and a cheaply made message but you also run the risk of oversimplifying or even trivializing the issues you’re trying to bring light to by misrepresenting them >

Filmmaking has ALWAYS included social commentary, moral personal dilemmas, a POV regarding current social issues and politics, etc. This is nothing new, and wont ever stop, because thats what makes conflict interesting. Arguably its impossible to write a story without including one own's views on these issues in one way or another. >

Agreed. I lean conservative, and I don't mind social commentary in my films--even progressive social commentary. 
One of my favorite films is Predestination, which has a very progressive message cloaked in a time loop sci-fi film. The progressive message is there, you just have to dig to reach it.
And that's my only complaint about modern popular films: they don't give us anything to "dig" for. Not all are so shallow, of course, but many. >

What progressive message did you find in Predestination?