>

Just wait until you see the length of the life cycle of those Chinese evs. You’ll likely need to make 4 evs to replace the use of one ICE or hybrid.
What source are you looking at? Here's what your '5 minutes of googling' suggestion got me:

The Union of Concerned Scientists did the best and most rigorous assessment of the carbon footprint of Tesla’s and other electric vehicles vs internal combustion vehicles including hybrids. They found that the manufacturing of a full-sized Tesla Model S rear-wheel drive car with an 85 KWH battery was equivalent to a full-sized internal combustion car except for the battery, which added 15% or one metric ton of CO2 emissions to the total manufacturing.
However, they found that this was trivial compared to the emissions avoided due to not burning fossil fuels to move the car. Before anyone says “But electricity is generated from coal!”, they took that into account too, and it’s included in the 53% overall reduction. 

Forbes
The conclusion I'm seeing is that the footprint of building a tesla is the same as a gas vehicle plus 15%, which is rapidly offset by the fuel source.
Edit: and here's a Reuters breakdown which shows Teslas break even around 15,000 miles, out of a typical 170,000 mile life of a car. >

Lol, funny when they have to left out the battery production and then call it trivial where the battery is the heart of it. And in normal uses, some car get multiple battery replacement. 
And the battery go to waste land and continue to polute. >

They didn't leave out the battery; what I quoted states it adds 15% to the footprint or about 1 metric ton of CO2. The article then goes on to say that tesla batteries are recycled, recovering 70% of the carbon. Did you not bother to read it or am I misinterpreting the article? >

Everyone knows electric cars have a high initial cost. The point is that they're greener over the course of their lifetime, because they're much more fuel efficient. >

They’re not though, the batteries don’t give you the stated drive distance in the first place and eventually they will have to be replaced. Hopefully your battery type will still be in production by that time. If not, you’ll be paying the same amount you paid for the car in purchasing antiquated batteries or just scrap your car completely. >

Lol this is not based in any reality >

You're forgetting about the CO2 released in fuel production. Making the gas and diesel also releases tons of CO2. You're just comparing battery production to fuel consumption without thinking about the fuel production as well.  
And you'll be lucky if you can find a 2013 vehicle with only 90k on the odometer. >

"And you'll be lucky if you can find a 2013 vehicle with only 90k on the odometer" No you won't. That's perfectly reasonable and a lot of the time it's even less. >

Fyi the average driver drives 14,263 miles a year according to the Federal Highway Administration.  That comes out to 128,367 miles in 9 years on average. >

That doesn't mean that the average car is driven 14,263 miles (or 12.7k miles) a year. 
The average amount driven is 12.7k miles per year. Times 9, that's about 114k miles. 
The average car will of course be driven less than the average driven miles per year, because a lot of people have more than 1 car, drive more than 1 car, etc. >

This should be a popular opinion, but unfortunately ev’s are a status symbol and it’s benefits have been totally greenwashed. >

Isn’t that crazy. Places like China have in their largest cities ev’s being the norm and look in Europe and North America and people think they’re fancy and expensive. These places are getting so behind in everything it ain’t pretty.