>

The robber keeps telling the media that he wants peace and they keep straight faced reporting it.
Even if he did Iran has admitted it, Russia admits it and the Israelis are singing it from the top of the hills to everyone who will listen. >

Technically Iran gas admitted to giving drones to Russia. There argument is that they are not giving them the drones to attack Ukraine.  Or in other words… all I did was give him a gun, I didn’t give him a gun to shoot the cashier at the liquor store, just simply gave him the gun so I’m not actually an accomplice to the crime because it’s not illegal to just give some one a gun. >

Except, in this scenario, they’re handing them a gun in the middle of the robbery… >

And pointing it at civilians >

And teaching them how to shoot it >

While the robber keeps saying "If you give me that gun I will use it for this robbery. I will definitely do that" >

So clearly the cashier needs to stop screaming, "they're giving the criminals guns!" or else they might really get upset and do some of the aforementioned things as retaliation against such defamation. >

If the bank would just give them the deed to the bank itself, allow the robbers to dictate how the bank is run, and allow the robbers access to all of the resources the bank rightfully owns,  the robbers wouldn't be so violent. 
So if you think about it, the bank is equally at fault for the continuation of the violence.