>

It was not in the constitution, now it is.
It was however in national laws and pretty sure it’s a requirement by Europe.
The only change is that other laws that might lead to discrimination like this can be blocked on constitutional grounds if anyone tries to pass them.
"Discriminatie op basis van godsdienst, levensovertuiging, politieke gezindheid, ras, geslacht, of op welke andere grond dan ook, is verboden."
It kind of is there already no? >

It was already illegal, but it's now in the constitution. On one hand it's a mostly symbolic gesture, on the other hand this should theoretically be more difficult to undo for future legislators. >


on the other hand this should theoretically be more difficult to undo for future legislators.

Nope. Not in the slightest. This is an entirely symbolic gesture that changes absolutely nothing but some of the wording, and arguably weakens the overall constitutional ban on discrimination by being specific about certain subjects.
While it might still be nice as a purely symbolic gesture, there really is no practical change to speak of. >

I'm thinking of moving to the netherlands >

It was already banned before this change. It only creates more labels to put on people. >

Even better must've created more protections now I even more wanna move there. >

Nope, doesn’t change anything at all. Purely symbolic. More than welcome to come here but this shouldn’t be the reason. >

than what's the point of the bill.......