>
Clothes that are so thin they expose the clothes beneath them are not clothes >

Leggings are made to be worn underneath clothing and joggers are made to be worn over neath. Joggers are not tight fitting whereas leggings are.
You argument consists of opposites being the same. >

I don't care one way or the other but I will be using overneath from now on. >

Men should just stfu. Only incels and abusive men complain about stuff like that. 
Let women be. 
But in response to what you have plastered here, I say, hell no. You know they make leggings for men, right? And they make joggers mostly unisex but they have women's joggers also. You're grasping at straws, bud. >

It's a little tone-deaf to suggest there's 0 gendered implications between the two styles.