>

Can we stop using "Spyplane", "Warplane", and "Warship"? It gives barely any information about the vehicle in question and just sounds like it's coming from the vacabulary of a 6th grader.
Airborne early warning and control system is easy to understand, gives significantly more information, and doesn't sound as amateurish. Or at least use reconnaissance aircraft if you are desperate to not give too much information in the title.
Same with fighter aircraft, frigate, destroyer, etc. 
Those names exist for a reason.
The title and article are simply rubbish....