>

Opinion must be in the title
You mean cgi? It’s pretty unanimously agreed upon that it’s bad. >

Crap, here I am thinking it's happening so much and is just being accepted >

It’s used frequently to save money. It’s a lot easier to use cgi instead of drawing. The downside is that it’s really hard to make look good since it’s jarring compared to the drawn animation. There’s a lot of backlash on its usage,  but if it’s done well then no one complains cause they probably didn’t even notice. >

Well just because it’s noticeable doesn’t inherently make it bad. >

That’s very true. Cgi is fine if it works well. It’s not bad cause it’s cgi. It’s bad when it doesn’t fit the art style, it’s done poorly or used in places where it probably doesn’t need to be used.