>

Yeah but that would imply that free will is somehow worth the suffering it brings, also there are studies to show most people have a lot less free will than they think just by changing environmental factors, so in my opinion it's possible free will is an illusion
Not a Christian, but I don't think that's an accurate understanding of the Christian answer to the problem of evil. Most often the argument seems to be that evil is a consequence of God creating beings with free will. Your understanding would imply that Christians believe our reality is the best possible reality, which they obviously do not. >

How could they not? How could an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent deity not create the best of all possible worlds.  
If it could have created a better would and didn't, it's not omnibenevolent. 
If a better world exists, and it can't create it, it's not omnipotent. >

You're just restating the problem of evil here in different terms. I already explained what I think is the most common Christian answer to the problem of evil in the comment above.