>

That’s a good point, I hadn’t though about abuse and coercion. Maybe there is a way to make the terms and conditions prevent this; I think requiring both a signature from the patient and their next of kin, along with a terminal diagnosis, ensures that in most cases euthanasia will be performed to prevent prolonged, unnecessary suffering. But I can still think of situations where this might not be the case, or at least the full case.
those who oppose the legalization of euthanasia argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a life, and that allowing euthanasia could lead to abuse and coercion of vulnerable individuals
solve that, and the issue would no longer be an issue