>

They are having their shit publicly subpoenaed. That's step 2 or 3 if securing a bulletproof conviction.
six Nevada GOP members signed electoral college certificates falsely stating that Trump won Nevada in 2020 and sent them to Congress and the National Archives

They should be expelled from office, and charged >

But Garland is afraid to look political! 😟 >

Says who? Not Garland if you read his actual words >

Says Garland, if you look at his actual actions. >

Such as? >

“The DOJ speaks through it’s filings”. 2 years after Jan 6 and nobody has even been indicted, much less actually brought to trial. 
Hell, even subpoenas have only started this month. DOJ has been avoiding this like the plague. >


2 years after Jan 6 and nobody has even been indicted, much less actually brought to trial. 

This is incorrect. Lots of insurrectionists have been prosecuted and some have even been convicted for seditious conspiracy.
However, that doesn't mean the DOJ's prosecutors think they can win a sedition case, or on other charges, against Republicans involved in the fake elector scheme (among other things). It's not like this sort of case is constantly being prosecuted with loads of historical precedent. It's a terrible novelty and therefore the possibility of fucking up a trial is high. >

All nobodies and pawns without political consequences. Garlands attempt to quell some noise and remain aloof from hard decisions.
Wouldn’t even charge Gaetz, when he was gifted the Venmo receipts. He’s the most cowardly AG we’ve ever had, and his cowardice has only empowered the next coup.
Germany managed to jail the Austrian after his first attempt. Even Russia exiled Lenin after his first attempt. We can’t even do that. >

What people think can be achieved under the law and what happens at trial are often two completely different outcomes.
DOJ is wise to be cautious (if that's the reason).
Otherwise, keep in mind the long history of the USA not doing shit about shit -- like the one guy convicted for the My Lai massacre got pardoned and to my knowledge nobody (edit) higher up has gone to jail for torturing POWs in violation of US law and international treaty the USA is a signatory to, much less destroying a whole country that didn't attack us for a non-existent objective. Those outcomes are more about judges and politicians than prosecutors or the actual law. >


transcripts show McDonald invoked his Fifth Amendment protection 275 times when he was interviewed in February.

LOL >

Why are these fake electors not getting arrested?