>

Which countries and why? Because you say so? LMAO
If one would question the sovereignty of Ukraine after 30 years, you could do the same to all parts of the former USSR, including Russia. 
Let's invade Russia too! Is that what you are trying to say? /s
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has delivered a defiant wartime message in Washington, DC, in which he thanked US leaders and "Ordinary Americans" for supporting his country's fight against Russia and reminded them that military assistance to Ukraine was not "Charity" but an "Investment" in a democratic world.
Invoking memories of the United States's victory over Nazi Germany in a key World War II battle, Zelenskyy also said there could be "No compromises" in trying to bring an end to Russia's war on his country.
In his first trip outside of Ukraine since the war began in February, Zelenskyy told a joint session of the US Senate and House of Representatives on Wednesday that he hoped they would continue to support his country's war effort on a bipartisan basis.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Zelenskyy^#1 Ukraine^#2 War^#3 Ukrainian^#4 Biden^#5 >

if the west compromised with Putins Russia we will have the same Story again in 5 years with  Moldova or Georgia or Russia want to claim more territory on Ukraine or Poland whatever .. >

Imagine describing yourself as marxist but also openly supporting fucking Russia, in essence one of the clearest examples of hypercapitalistic kleptocracy where very few rule the entire country with the people being permanently repressed and controlled. >

100% agree. I'm a ML myself but nothing could ever justify the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Never mind the fact that Russia is a hypercapitalistic dystopia and has been since the 90s. >

Dude this blizzard has me too drunked up, I was wondering why a mother-in-law would have a big say in this 😅 >

Fuck Russia. Drive it out of Ukraine. No compromises with terrorist states. Leave them to eat themselves. >

Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 >

MEHOYAM SLAVA! >

Well, Neville Chamberlain tried to “compromise” with the Nazis through appeasement, and we know how well that turned out. >

There is a common idea among some Ukrainians that the moment we are in right now "rhymes" with Czechoslovakia in 1938. Except in the case of Czechoslovakia USA, UK, and France decided to not support Czechoslovakia which was getting ready for war prior to Munich. Would there even be a WW2 if they resisted and with the material help from allies were able to repel Nazi Germany? But would Czechoslovakia survive a war like that?
Edit: for some reason I added USA to the Munich - they obviously were not part of it >

USA had nothing to do with the munich agreement, they weren't even invited. this was completely up to the uk and france (which even had an alliance of sorts with czechoslovakia) and both decided to 'make a business decision' as they say. it's an interesting hypothetical though, could the uk and france in '38 successfully resisted germany in an early european war? perhaps they stop germany then and there and the european theater of ww2 never happens, but perhaps they get beat then and there, causing the uk (under chamberlain) to sign a peace agreement with germany instead. this possible outcome could be drastically worse than our current timeline. >

German generals (or some higher ups in the German army at the time I can’t remember) were convinced that if France had gone all out in Sept ‘39, the German army wouldn’t have lasted 2 weeks. 
I’ll try to find the source on this >

It was during the sitzkrieg when France quickly pushed and occupied a small section of southwest Germany then jerked off for 2 weeks and went home. All of Germany's divisions we're in Poland and the path to Berlin was wide open. Just one of the many miracles that kept the Nazi conquest alive during and before WW2. Course luck runs out after a while. >

French leadership was completely inept during WW2.
The first Ardennes Offensive should not have worked either when aerial reconnaissance had spotted German tanks driving through the forest, except iirc that report was dismissed as impossible.
The Mers-el-Kébir incident also could've been completely avoided if the French had just agreed to sail the ships to US waters/French-Caribbean, which that admiral had orders to do anyways if anyone attempted to seize the ships. >

“Putin causes WW3 with unlawful invasion of a sovereign nation”. —fixed the headline >

What is your defence of the Russian invasion since I am so blind? >

You didn't answer the question. No propaganda, an answer: what gives Russia the right to murder, rape, and destroy a sovereign nation that does not wish to be a part of theirs? There's no "b-b-but the west bad!" here, this is what Russia is doing and that's what you need to defend. They are lying to their people to trick them into committing suicide by Ukranian and extreme cruelty when they survive all to live out Putin's soviet fantasy. Justify it. >


What gives Ukraine the right to do that?

To do what? To defend itself?

Also what makes Ukraine sovereign?

Because it became an independent nation 30 years ago. Much like Russia itself. 

Russia isn't the one lying here or getting people killed needlessly.

Go to Ukraine and have a look.