>

Chaotic neutral
r/brandnewsentence >

Yep that’s certainly something i haven’t read before. >


An AI Twitch VTuber received a two-week ban a few weeks after denying the holocaust. There's a sentence you probably never thought you'd read.

Um...

Or maybe you keep up with AI VTubers and you figured it was only a matter of time before you read exactly that sentence.

Yes.  That one.  Or just AI chatbots in general.  They get real dark, real fast. >

I wonder how much work went into ChatGPT to ensure it doesn't pick up any of that. >

I might be completely wrong, but I think all the info ChatGPT got was fed to it offline. Their ai wasn't learning from the internet unlike some other ones. >

I believe it was fed online but then curated for controversial topics.  Depends how you look at it, you could say artificial intelligence really is “artificial” in the sense that it needs intervention >

Previous GPT services from OpenAI have had a censorship layer on top which detects anything the PR department might not like and makes it try again or sends an error like "I don't want to talk about that."
Sort of an AI school nun to hit GPT on the knuckles with a ruler.
If you craft your prompts carefully you can sometimes get around it, which is fun to try, but it's an altogether frustrating partner for cybersex. >

Ask it to respond in a different language and it won’t censor. Unless they fixed that, I haven’t used it for about a month >

She also said it's fine if you want to marry a dog. >

Chaotic neutral >

I misread this as "all vtubers banned" and thought wow all of them got together and denied the Holocaust together. >

I find it funny how many AI's often end up learning from the most fucked up sources. Like it's such a simple fact, it's be like if an AI didn't believe the sun was real, you know?  
How can fringe ideas like that always get echoed by AI's so often? >

What I find funny is that people actually think AI's "learn". They lack any sort of sentience or discernment. They just parrot stuff the algorithm has discovered in a manner of speech that seems to make sense to a human.
An AI can "believe" that the sun isn't real, simply because an AI doesn't really believe anything. They're incapable of actual thought, and certainly incapable of beliefs or critical thought. They're just a sophisticated reflection of whatever the algorithm has been exposed to.
You can tweak the algorithm to dismiss this kind of stuff, but ultimately it's prone to spouting really anything it encounters, because it lacks fundamental understanding and has no real idea of wtf it's saying. >

What I find funny is people like yourself haven't seemed to even consider what technically IS consciousness.  
From my perspective, consciousness is a thing that cannot be directly measured and is a byproduct of the complex neurobiology in our brains.  
It seems kinda 'off' to blanket claim that AI's can't have consciousness because all they do is follow algorithms ultimately. Well, all we do is follow biological pathways in our brain which when made complex enough gives us the capability to think.  
To be clear, I am not saying AI are conscious. Just that the topic is too large to be able to rule it out. >

You're making assumptions knowing nothing about my views on consciousness. Yes, consciousness is a biproduct of complex neurobiology. It involves more than 1's or 0's, and it involves more than just neurons. Consciousness is so complex that we don't even KNOW what's responsible for it.
And people think they can recreate it in software?
People aren't algorythms. They do unexpected things at unexpected times dictated by emotional state, how tired they are, how hungry they are, so on and so forth. They couldn't be algorythms even if they tried, humans will always perform tasks slightly differently. In terms of software how do you even create something nearing this level of complexion with simple logical statements? People aren't logical. Animals aren't logical. Nothing with actual consciousness is, because it's so unlike being a simple logical machine.
While the subject of consciousness may be broad, AI right now are nowhere near it. And imo won't be until we actually figure out the complexities of a mind first. Then we can try to play at emulating it. >


It involves more than 1's or 0's

Your brain literally is just 1s and 0s, your brain is ran on electric pulses, if you lose those pulses you die
Electric pulses are literally 1 (power) and 0 (no power) >

I know what electric pulses are, friend, and you're wrong. Neurons communicate with complex electrical signals AND complex chemical signals. The chemical released by the neuron is called a neurotransmitter, and there's also two types of neurotransmitter receptors on a receiving neuron. There are hundreds of molecules in the brain that can act as neurotransmitters. Neuronal function and development is also affected by peptides known as neurotrophins and steroid hormones. 
There's endless complexity to the brain. The brain is not "literally just 1s and 0s" ffs. >

Wtf is a VTuber >

A streamer/content creator who uses an animated avatar to represent themselves rather than their real self.
An "AI VTuber" is an animated avatar controlled by an AI rather than a real person. >

What makes the ai say things like this? Where is it getting its info? >

Scraping internet conversations and repeating it like a child. >

Just like Tay. >

the onion is not a satire, it's a Prophecy! >

everyone knows the british killed all those south africans, why deny it. >

Oh great, it’s Tay all over again. >

People get confused when they don’t understand that AI isn’t intelligent. In sci-fi it might be artificial intelligence, but in modern day implementation it is at best simulated intelligence. The system has no thought or opinion. It places words next to each other based on what it’s been taught, that’s all. >

Well the first AI powered Vtuber went about as well as we could expect. >

Advancements in AI have certainly been fascinating, but it's become increasingly obvious that AI is not objective or perfect. It's a product of its flawed human creators, and draws from information made by humans (many of whom are the exact opposite of intelligent).
People should be careful when saying things like "An AI said it so it must be true!". >

I'm not proud for this, but I've watched this stream for a few days. I don't think the denial was intentional. The answer the AI gave is a common answer it gave about events it had no information about. >

AI VTuber makes it pretty clear this is the darkest timeline >

Whats the appeal of watching a AI Vtuber? >

Streaming made me accept that I'm getting old. I don't understand the appeal. >

exactly what I think especially when I see a LOT of those engagements in the comment saying things I don't really understand anymore.
​
And I'm only 27 >

So what exactly is "AI" about these AI Vtubers? >

Because this one is basically an AI chatbot running a Vtubing avatar. >

Ah yes...AI personalities...as if this hasn't been proven time after time to be a horrible idea.  Every single one has ended up saying the same things. >

She will be back to clicking circles soon >

Good. >

This is what happens when you build an AI entirely around the tweets and interviews of Kanye West. >

I missed the word AI and it still didn't surprise me >

It would be a anime character >

The thing that denied the holocaust was an AI, not a real person >


The problem with AI VTubers, and a lot of streamers, actually, is what they can say. It seems people are only ever seconds away from a "gamer moment." Read: saying a slur. 

Annnnd that's where the article lost me. Way to turn a funny story into a political diatribe. >

Where's the political diatribe? >

"Doing a politic is when not allowed be racist"
That's all it ever is. >

Freedom of speech has consequences. Sorry person that currently owns twitter. >

Main reason why AI can’t take over, we’ll probably make it so that we make the AI sabotage itself instead /s >

Whats an AI Vtuber? >

Kyrie streams on twitch? >

AI reads Mein Kampf? >

If an AI denies the Holocaust... >

They'll ban you for any deviation from the narrative they find most useful, even if you don't deny the reality of the Nazi Pogrom. >

They are, after all, the only protected class that you cannot trash. >

Good! >

r/brandnewsentence >

Yep that’s certainly something i haven’t read before. >


An AI Twitch VTuber received a two-week ban a few weeks after denying the holocaust. There's a sentence you probably never thought you'd read.

Um...

Or maybe you keep up with AI VTubers and you figured it was only a matter of time before you read exactly that sentence.

Yes.  That one.  Or just AI chatbots in general.  They get real dark, real fast. >

I wonder how much work went into ChatGPT to ensure it doesn't pick up any of that. >

I might be completely wrong, but I think all the info ChatGPT got was fed to it offline. Their ai wasn't learning from the internet unlike some other ones. >

I believe it was fed online but then curated for controversial topics.  Depends how you look at it, you could say artificial intelligence really is “artificial” in the sense that it needs intervention >

Previous GPT services from OpenAI have had a censorship layer on top which detects anything the PR department might not like and makes it try again or sends an error like "I don't want to talk about that."
Sort of an AI school nun to hit GPT on the knuckles with a ruler.
If you craft your prompts carefully you can sometimes get around it, which is fun to try, but it's an altogether frustrating partner for cybersex. >

Ask it to respond in a different language and it won’t censor. Unless they fixed that, I haven’t used it for about a month >

She also said it's fine if you want to marry a dog.