>

That is built on the assumption that there is an inherent conflict between men and women and that we are trying to oppress each other. In reality men and women work together and complement each other. Pointing out that certain players on the same team are better suited for certain roles isn't oppression, it is good resource management.
/u/ILikeMistborn (OP) has awarded 1 delta(s) in this post.
All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >

I don't think that would help, because I don't think sexism has a strong rational basis.
If somebody is sexist against women, and the difference in strength between the two groups is part of the reason, I doubt they would be compelled by genetic modification. I think it's more likely they would say "you only match men's strength because of technology, you are still naturally inferior."
While the reasons for sexism against women are complicated, I don't think they are particularly logical or factual.
Also note, not everybody would want this modification. In fact, it is my wild speculation that a majority wouldn't.