>

Will the next bill McCarthy proposes be for declaring the earth is flat?
He can "look into it" all he wants. It's not possible to do. He can even pass a bill in the House declaring Trump's impeachments null and void, but there will be no effect from it. There's no mechanism to undo an impeachment. Trump was impeached twice. The only thing that will change that will be if he's impeached a third time. >

Yeah I have no idea what this is even referring to. It's just making shit up. There's no such thing in the constitution, where impeachment is formulated.
Maybe they can write a resolution declaring Trump the current President while they are at it. It'd be equally valid. >

I overestimated McCarthy’s intelligence….🦧 >

This is easy to do considering how dumb the guy is.  I mean he is truly really not intelligent. >

Is it too soon to ask when is the actual business of governing this nation going to start? >


Is it too soon to ask when is the actual business of governing this nation going to start?

When dems have control of the house and senate again. Maybe in 2026. >

That's true.  Totally overlooked the need to bring back smoking in government buildings and such.  When I read about the Missouri female attire nonsense, I could just imagine this happening at the federal level where burqa like restrictions on female members would be enacted.  Shoot it wasn't that long ago that (gasp) a woman wore pants during her official duties.  Plenty of twisted boxers.   I guess oppressing various segments of our population is hard work. >

Burqa "like" is the key. As soon as someone wears an actual Burqa, they will try to ban them. Only Christian approved attire allowed. >

Yes of course silly me.  Thanks for the correction.  :) >

Sounds like when my 4 year old asks if she can have yet another toy and I say “yeah I’ll look into it.” >

Yes. People in this thread are acting as if this is McCarthy's idea. No, it's the idea of some idiot from Oklahoma. McCarthy is (almost certainly) never even going to think about this again.
I think McCarthy is an idiot too, but he's not this idiot. >

Actually, I think it was something he had to promise in exchange for votes. 
And based on the current crop of crazy that has infected the GOP, is it really that out of the question that they would do this? Just look at all the bullshjt they have brought us over the past several years: denying SCOTUS appointment; overturning Roe; locking kids in cages; not voting to certify Biden's election; lying about voter fraud; January 6; not holding Trump accountable for anything; Q-Anon; criminally incompetent covid response; anti maskers, anti vaccine nut jobs, increased racism, anti-semitism and LGBTQphobia, chronic ignoring of subpoenas, ignoring and enabling people like Greene, Gaetz and Boebert, not to mention spending time and tax payer $$ on legislating how women dress and smoking in their offices. The list of crazy is long...
At this point,  I would be surprised if they didn't try this. >

Perhaps he did, but it’s still not a thing. Impeachment is an historical record, not a judicial conviction. Expungement is for convictions. >

Agreed. However my point is that McCarthy and the rest of them will still try it, legality or precedent be dammed. >

You can bet that his willingness to look into this was one of the concessions he made to get those last few votes he needed.
There's a reason MTG had Trump on the phone talking to the so-called freedom caucus. >

Kev…Kev…tapping on microphone. Are you sure you can even do that? I thought you were going to follow the Constitution. 
Oh, never mind. BRING BACK “Drunk History,” and force the House Republicans to watch it on a loop until they can at least pass a test about how the government works/the Constitution. >

Totally not something a cult would do. >

The insurrectionist Donald Trump who lost the election? The losingest President in history? That Donald Trump? >

The only impeached President with bipartisan support? >

I thought Republicans didn't believe in erasing history. >

Pretty sure that's not possible >

Yes keep tying your fortunes to Trump, it's doing wonders for Democratic voter turnout. >

McCarthy & GOP sure seem to want to spend all their energies on issues of absolutely no consequence. >

They are responding to the daily morning phone calls from Trump.  Everything they've been doing thus far has MAGA written all over it. >

Well Kilmeade and Co won’t answer anymore… >

By doing so, McCarthy would be sanctioning insurrections, abuse of power, and obstruction of congress. >

Once you’ve made the sale, you can stop pitching. >

Oh Kevin, how many different ways could you possibly embrace corruption.  It is written all over that face of yours! >

This has strong Michael Scott "I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY" vibes. >

Does he have a time machine because I am quite sure the history books are done on this. >

Objection!!! >

So, unimpeaching him?
Using what, time travel? >

Donald is squeezing McCarthy’s little balls. >

Mitch McConnell already said in a Senate speech immediately after the last impeachment vote that T was guilty.
Will Mitch also give a speech now and say "I did enter that into the record, but I was drunk so it doesn't count."? >

I am so glad the totally-adult GOP leadership has prioritized issues that help everyday Americans. >

And then we will all imagine they did not happen . . . >

On Jan 6th 2021, they attempted a coup and spread their shit all over the halls of Congress,
But they were not arrested or punished in any way. So they were emboldened. 
In 2023, they successfully took over the House and are now spreading their shit right inside Congress. 
Good job, GOP. >

Because Trump will run as a 3rd party candidate and ruin the GOP's 2024 chances out of spite if he doesn't. >

Willing to bet he’ll do it regardless lol >

“My Kevin” has promised so many things to so many people, none of which will amount to anything. >

not happening, he can go eat a dick. >

The only way to do that is to erase history. >

Stop giving them ideas, Texas has undue influence over what's in history textbooks. >

Impeachment means literally nothing now. It's just an asterisk on a name. That's it. It used to hold weight when the GOP actually cared about image. Now they just don't give a single fuck. >

Speaker Kevin McCarthy informed me that I was 20 for 20 on Tuesday with respect to my Endorsement of him. Sadly, I didn’t get that information from the FAKE NEWS Media. They don’t report those things.
Great interview with Speaker Kevin McCarthy on OANN. “There was no urgency with the Articles of Impeachment because there was no case.”  In other words a total WITCH HUNT.
-DJT >


Speaker Kevin McCarthy informed me that I was 20 for 20 on Tuesday with respect to my Endorsement of him. Sadly, I didn’t get that information from the FAKE NEWS Media. They don’t report those things.

What? He's taking credit for the converting the holdouts? Even though not all of them crossed over? And those that did still took days? >

If I recall he actually lost a couple votes in the first round that Wednesday.
Trump is rainmaking people. >

Which one >

I'm going to look into shitting out gold bricks daily. >

Which one? >

He’s already been impeached you stupid fucker >

Wasting Congress's time 👍
Ding your job of legislating 🖕 >

That and the TINA (Trump is NOT an Asshole) bills are sure to be key Republican legislative actions this term. >

Fuck you >

the fucking hell he will (actually do it). I've never gone up and protested at the Capitol, but this would get me up there. >

"Stop the Sequel" >

Which one? >

Not surprising. when I went to the Ways & Means Committee website to  look up the report they had issued on DJT's tax returns in December -- it had disappeared! As a matter of fact, a quick search back to 2009  couldn't find a single press release posted by a Democrat. Where did they all go?