>

Oh no. Intentional voter fraud really should carry heinous amounts of prison time. Not doing so undermines the importance of one of the core tenets of our country.
She realized it was impossible to get 23 people to like her husband enough to vote for him. >

She should have asked his mistresses. >

She tried, the boys said no >

She tried but they arent old enough to vote >

She tried, but it was illegal, so she tried again. >

After the second time she tried to crawl through the window, she was shot by an American hero. >

"say her name."
"Traitor McTraitorFace" >

She tried, but they oinked in disapproval >

so by previously established precedent she should be facing 115 years in jail, right? right? >

I assume you're talking about this person, who had the audacity, as a black woman, to cast a provisional ballot that was never counted? >


I assume you're talking about this person, who had the audacity, as a black woman, to cast a provisional ballot that was never counted?

No, not Mason who followed poll worker advice, immigrant woman Ortega who followed poll worker and her parole officer's advice to vote because it's a civic responsibility and submitted a provisional ballot, and her reward for voting republican was 8 years in prison. >

I mean, these cases are different. 
Rosa Ortega cast several regular ballots after incorrectly (fraudulently) certifying that she was eligible to do so.
Crystal Mason cast a provisional ballot with the help of an election official because she was not certain if she was eligible to vote
I personally don't believe that either of these cases warrant prison time, but there's a pretty significant difference in the two. Provisional ballots literally exist for these edge cases where validity or whatever is in question. You take the provisional ballot and, if after extra scrutiny it checks out, it's added to the tally. 
Ortega lied about being a citizen to vote. The notion that she was following advice of a parole officer to do so is news to me; source?