>

And it's mostly Lend-Lease aid, which means as long as Ukraine exists, they're going to pay us back eventually, which is a boost to the US long term.
The Ukranian Lend Lease act passed the House 417-10 this year, and it runs through 2023.  So most Rs did support them, amd they can't really stop it for a full year even of they all switched.  
The Q-friendly and Russian corrupted or useful idiots will keep making noise, but there is no way they get the unanimity necessary to provoke a major legislative crisis in order to repeal the Lend Lease Act.
In short, it is all sound amd fury. >

This is what I’m thinking. The serious calls to cut the Ukrainian aid come from the villains caucus, the small minority who want to look as nasty and Putin-aligned as possible. >

"Villains Caucus". I like that. >

I prefer clown caucas myself >

Far right nutties like MTG aside, I doubt any campaign statement about Ukraine costing too much money is anything more than saber rattling. McCarthy knows Ukraine aid is chump change compared to america's need to feed the military industrial complex. >

Its a dumb argument to make anyway. Almost all the money being "sent" to Ukraine is being spent in the US buying military gear and services.