>

Intelleckshual
Clarence Thomas and the word intellectual dont belong in the same sentence >

Who do you think came up with the “Eastman” theory? It was none other than Clarence Thomas. 
Obviously I cant prove it, but it is no coincidence that it was Cleta Mitchell, Ginni Thomas’s best friend and co-worker, that suggested Eastman be the guy to come up with a quasi-constitutional reason for attempting the coup in regards to the false electors. 
Almost everyone involved with the Eastman part of the coup is directly linked to Ginni Thomas, who is clearly in cahoots with her husband. >

Eastman’s lawyer grasps at straws. >

When you know that you are defending a guilty as sin individual, all you can do is throw bullshit at the wall and hope something sticks. >

Their big idea is that the Constitution is subordinate to some higher law, which the founders unfortunately didn't bother to write down.  Therefore we should ignore the Constitution and its amendments (that were written down)and just rely on Eastman, Thomas & Co. to tell us what the law is.
That doesn't deserve to be called a legal theory, it's jerkoff material for incels. >

"intellectual"
Clearance Thomas is owned by GOP mega donors >

Eastman is no legal giant or great legal scholar based on his half-baked legal theories of the electoral college and this doesn’t reflect well on Thomas, either.