>

Well you would. That's how it was marketed.
"Universal also argued that classifying trailers as "commercial speech" could open the door to many more lawsuits from dissatisfied filmgoers, who could make a subjective claim that a film did not live up to the expectations created by the trailer."
I'm fine with this. >


They referred to Jurassic Park, another Universal film, one trailer for which they said was comprised entirely of footage that is not in the movie.

Sounds like a second class action lawsuit is in order.
You can't claim "we didn't it before without penalties" doesn't mean you can do it all you want. >

I just watched Violent Night based on one line in the trailer, "Time for some seasons beatings." 
It wasn't in the movie at all. Still a good movie, but I was a little disappointed.
But David Harbour as an out of shape former-Viking-warrior-turned-Santa swinging a bloody hammer is my new kink, so I got that going for me. >

It looks pretty bad to me based on the trailers, but I’m interested in a new kink like that so maybe I’ll check it out. >

Wish I could sue for the Kangaroo Jack trailer >

Yeah for real. That was straight up false advertising. >

I straight up thought it was a kids movie about a talking kangaroos crazy adventures.