>

Oh god. She has offspring?
Like your husband exposing himself to children? >

The problem would be the hypocrisy, but honestly we already know she is a hypocrite. >

She loves someone who is at best a sexual harasser and at worst a pedophile. She doesn't want to fix anything. >

Even worse, she doesn't actually care about genuine child molestation, she just wants a way to express her homophobia in a way that she thinks people will accept. This is just bigotry, plain and simple, it's not about protecting children. >

No she gives a shit she's against investigations because her husband is a sex predator who flashed his dick at a bunch of underaged girls in a bowling alley while his 24 year old ass was dating and knocking up a 17 year old Lauren. >

Boebert was one of those under age girls in the alley >

I read they were actually on a date at the bowling alley when it happened.
So when he flashed it to the other underage girls and had the cops called on him, all in the middle of their date, she said "oh yeah, this is the dude for me".
I am assuming this is known because she gave a witness statement to the cops. >

How is that not a red flag?
If you have to testify to the police about your date sexually attacking minors while on a date with you, that's a red flag. >

She wanted to get married…to anyone >

Don’t worry, Matt Gaetz will do it if the bill doesn’t. >

Anybody know where Nestor is, btw? >

I heard he changed his name to George Santos. >

Can't spell George Santos without Gas Ego Nestor >

His name also anagrams out to anger stooges, which is a pretty good description of his voters. >

You also get Orangest Egos.  :)
Edit:  also Go Enrage Sots >

I'm  more worried about their father in that regard. He's got a history of violence and sex crimes against minors >

And she was a prostitute. >

Source? I don't like her either but this is a wild claim. >

There was a report from a PAC that claims to have an anonymous source that stated she was a prostitute, had 2 abortions and I'm pretty sure there were a couple of other inflammatory accusations as well. Boebert has denied it and threatened a defamation lawsuit, but the PAC has stuck to their guns on it. Interestingly enough, the guy who runs that PAC has filed a lawsuit for libel and slander against her. >

I mean isn’t this just like what the right does? You’re believing this anonymous source because you like the information. Like be objective here. Is this not the same thing? >

The photos that are clearly of her, tattoos included, from an escort service, was enough for me.. >

Who cares? Sex work should be destigmatized and legalized. 
If she was being hypocritical about it, that would be one thing. But I don't know that she's ever made any statements about sex workers. 
Hate Bobo for any of the thousands of other reasons, but IMO this isn't one of them. >

Unfortunately, you're requiring a level of nuance in opinions and fairness that our side is just as incapable of as theirs is. >

I gotta disagree. I think people on "our side" do need to be reminded of these nuances, perhaps just as much as others, but I also believe that once we're reminded we have a slightly higher tendency to acknowledge it and change based on it. >

On a more optimistic day, I agree with you completely. Also, I thought twice about terming it ’our side’. Good catch.