>

Right, she was their puppet. That's why they condemned her, sanctioned her, and essentially ousted her from the party.
Does that make sense to you? Her career is in shambles because of her involvement in the Jan 6 Committee. What is she getting out of this?
You honestly believe that people have no agency and are just puppets doing what they're commanded?
It's a missed opportunity to be sure, and doesn't make any sense. >

The focus of the committee report appears to be on people who were part of the government... and Ginni Thomas was technically only an activist who was tangentially organizing the events and people who would then go on to be the rioters.
This does not mean that she won't be a target of Jack Smith's investigation though. >

I agree with you — Jack Smith will be able to follow a lot of threads and unlike previous joke special counsels (Ken Starr and John Dunham), Smith has a wide remit, documented criminality, and a vast array of background investigative material to work with. Ginni Thomas probably believes she’s above the law and immune from scrutiny because of her marriage to Clarence Thomas, but I have a feeling Jack Smith already has her on the radar and could — quite possibly — mention the refusal by Justice Thomas to recuse himself in the case involving January 6 records from the White House. >

Doubtful.  The powerful will pervert the outcome.  See: Mueller. >

See Barr. >

Barr could be in charge by the time things are completed.  If I’m not mistaken, we all saw the crime on TV in real time, and no one organizing the violence has been arrested let alone charged. >

Wasn’t Stuart Rhodes just convicted of sedition like a month ago?
They have to get the people on the bottom and work their way up. >

I’d love to be wrong, but along the way to the top they’ll stop for the good of the country, aka rich people. >

The best thing for rich people is to dump trump because he will probably cost the Republican Party a chance at presidency if he isn’t in prison or barred from running. >

All of the conspirators meed to be brought to justice or they will be tempted to try again. The layers, staff, congressmen, and ginni thomas. >

I think the reason is the committee didn’t want to dilute the core story of the people at the top who were most responsible. 
If they had released a full laundry list of crimes they uncovered during their investigation it would have been easily waved away with Trump and co also using it as a foil to argue partisanship (witch hunt anyone). Instead they identified the key players that committed the most serious crimes, so now the answer to “witch hunt” is “yes, look at this coven of egregious witches and the clear evidence of their crimes”. >

All of us waiting for Watergate style indictments to start dropping need to realize that there was broad bipartisan support for such prosecutions then because the Republicans didn’t have Fox News et al to run interference for all the criminals in the government. >

Literally why Fox was started was to run opposition when they got caught after the next Watergate >

It was probably strategic, as much of this stuff has been, to avoid it being written off as conspiracy theorizing, even if everything in it is true. It’s all optics do this hits harder. >

I think the focus on Trump was very strategic. They want a former US President charged with federal crimes. There's really no precedent for that currently. They sort of had to create the precedent, and to some degree, pressure.
The DOJ is going to investigate and charge whoever they want anyway. It's not like the Jan 6 Committee are in any way limiting their ability to do that. >

Indeed. If they can take down the President for this, literally no position of direct or inferred privilege/authority will keep you safe. >

So far everyone appears safe despite the obvious 14a-3 disqualification. >

Her participation on the committee didn’t change my opinion of her in the slightest. >

I read somewhere that Cheney pushed to restrict the focus of the report to just the Trump administration and not the broader group of insurrectionists. We "the people," as they say, should acknowledge that conservatives are above the law and the rest of us are beneath it. Ginni Thomas is royalty and there is nothing within the current framework that the serfs can do about it. The norms and laws don't apply. Something else will have to. >

Yep, everyone who praised her as some heroic defender of democracy got played. Her job to was to go after Trump on behalf of the “establishment”/neocon wing of the party and limit the hangout to only Trump and his direct cronies.