>

She’s like the lowest effort bad faith actor I’ve ever seen. Really shows you that any idiot can do this. I just wish the idiots wouldn’t wind up getting there.
Married a sex offender and pals around Washington with another? She should look closer to home to end the predation on children.
She is basically a parrot.  Colorful. Can speak. Doesn't actually know what she is saying. Just lacks the playful, inquisitive nature. >

I feel like you grossly insulted parrots. >

Even my dead parrot is a better public speaker. >

He's not dead, he's just resting >

Pining for the fjords >

*repeats in an incredulous, high pitched voice* >

Lauren Boebert’s husband did jail time for "lewd exposure" in a bowling alley. She was there

Couple were 86'd from Colorado bowling alley in 2004 after Jayson Boebert exposed himself to two young women

The women were 24 and 17. >

I just want an interviewer on national TV to call her out on this live in the middle of her ranting about pedophiles and groomers just to witness the mental Olympics that would occur as she leaps and contorts to get out of it. >

She doesn't do national interviews unless with fascist propaganda outlets that are working with her handlers >

“If it wasn’t for sexual assault and pedophiles, i would have never met my husband.” >


Lauren Boebert bizarrely accuses senators voting for $1.7trn omnibus bill of wanting to ‘sexualise’ children

More Republican projection, as the human trash heap known as Lauren Boebert has obviously mistaken those senators for her pedophile husband, demonstrating yet again that every Republican accusation is a confession. >

They are trying to cheapen sexual assault so that nobody takes it seriously when it actually happens. This is intentional. >

People need to ask themselves why Boebert and the far right are completely obsessed with sexualizing children. >

Perhaps she could focus on ending toddler beauty pageants if she's so concerned about the kids. The ones where they put a pound of makeup on a three year old and have her strut around the stage. >

"Sexualize" = Prevent them from being raped by educating them how to defend themselves. 
That's it. That's literally it. Republicans long for the Halcyon days of old where "funny uncles" got away with their crimes because no one knew how to identify sexual abuse. If no one talks about it it doesn't exist. >

uh huh. a principal is on video giving his students butt plugs. sex ed i guess >

What the hell kind of connection is that? I'm sure some teacher did something questionable, there a thousands of them, I know for a fact a non-zero number are actual rapists, but how does that relate to...Anything at topic here? >

easy. teachers are sexualizing children and teaching gender ideology. do you disagree? >

What is gender ideology?
How are teachers sexualizing children?
Which teachers are doing this? >

Gender ideology is what is taught in gender studies. Google it. >

I decided to humor you and Googled "gender ideology", and the top link says

The term “gender ideology” has no academic or theoretical basis, nor a clear and coherent definition. It is used within conservative religious circles to vaguely denote policies or activism aimed at improving gender equality and upholding the rights of women and the LGBTQI community. >

uh huh, the top link eh?? what do they teach in gender studies? >

I'm not sure except that it doesn't have anything to do with gender ideology. 
Colleges put their curriculums online. I doubt that you can find a gender studies syllabus that includes gender ideology, but if you can find one I'll look at it. >

At this point her asinine remarks aren’t even newsworthy.
When she starts speaking coherently about actual issues, then she might be headline worthy. >

she's the expert.. and somehow still got it wrong. >

Just like her husband. She'd know. >

Says the woman who should know... But doesn't >

The GOP should really not be surprised if they are voted out of office again in droves come 2024.  If they can't restrain their idiots, they'll be defined by them. >

At least a fencepost has a clear purpose. >

From the Denver Post:

"Boebert was arrested twice in Mesa County in 2015. As first reported by Colorado Newsline, Boebert was detained on June 20, 2015, after a verbal altercation with police at Country Jam, a music festival near Grand Junction. Boebert, then 28 years old, allegedly shouted at people detained on suspicion of underage drinking, urging them to flee from police, which caused the young drinkers to become unruly.
While she was being handcuffed for disorderly conduct, Boebert tried to twist away from police, according to deputies’ reports. She allegedly shouted that her arrest was unconstitutional, that “she had friends at Fox News and that the arrest would be national news.” It did not become national news."

She just cares about the young ones so much. >

Her clients at Fox news from her time as an escort, where she met Ted Cruz. >

Maybe her bestie Matt Gaetz can give her some tips on the headline topic. >

100% pure ultra-refined projection, considering that she married a man who was convicted of exposing his penis to underage teenage girls at a bowling-alley snack bar. >

Yes bc republicans care so much about the children >

She is the reason we need education requirements to hold office. Think about how many other government jobs, state or federal, she would not meet minimum requirements for and ask how she is qualified to make any decisions. >

We kind of already have education requirements. But they can't be too strict or we'll start to see holding office as a more exclusive club than it already is.
We need to implement regular psychological and mental health screenings of members of government in order to determine if they're fit for office >

I’m not necessarily completely opposed to mental health screenings, but I feel like that comes with problems too.
For one, who is doing the screening, and what’s stopping them from conducting a biased screening or inconsistently enforcing guidelines?
Speaking of guidelines, what disqualifies someone? Can someone with depression not serve as an elected official? OCD? A personality disorder? Anorexia? Gender dysphoria is in the DSM as well, and so is autism. And if the criteria says any disorders must be well managed, what are the criteria for that? Do we have to routinely test people for how severe their mental health conditions are? 
What about delusions? Is there any risk of someone being considered delusional because of political beliefs? I realize this line has been blurred lately, to say the least. But when do we consider someone delusional versus just holding an unpopular or unlikely sentiment? To many, perhaps people of varying beliefs, “the rich have conspired to make the poor fight amongst themselves and stay poor” is a legitimate belief, but to others that might sound delusional or paranoid. 
I’m not trying to be argumentative for the sake of it. I just worry about things like this being used in nefarious ways. >

Bobo the clown is doing what she always does… struggling to extend the attention on her. >

Democrats should run Frisch again in 24. Now that they know her seat is vulnerable, they can actually allocate funds there to win that seat, unlike last time. Furthermore, many voters who thought Boebert had it in the bag and stayed home will now be more likely to turn up. >

Ignores the child sex trafficker right next to her;  reads her fantasies in legislation. >

Didn't this dipstick vote against the recent child abuse bill? 
What absolute DFs are voting for these asshats? >

The groomer pedo conspiracy shit is starting to become the go to issue for these grifters. >

you mean like your husband did to you and your friends at the bowling alley?  I thought you'd be all for that. >

Woah, woah, her husband did not expose himself to her in a bowling alley. He only did that to two underage girls he didn't know!
He hit her while they were dating though.
Make sure you're being factual when talking about how trash these people are! >

You're quibbling over the fact that he actually only exposed himself to two young women and not three ... really? >

I'm not quibbling. Just pointing out he's a sex offender and an abusive piece of shit! >

I thought she was present at the time, but yes he exposed his pecker to underage girls at the bowling alley.  Thanks for the clearup. >

Oh, she was present. She does denies that her wife beating husband committed another crime. >

Every few minutes those two brain cells bouncing around in there collide, she calls someone a pedophile because she thinks she's at home then she goes back into dormant mode >

Low IQ organism says a thing >

Calling people pedophiles has become the right's new "9/11 let's roll never forget why do you hate America?" >

While they ignore their churches and the egregious amount of child sexual abuse that ACTUALLY happens there.  They just don't want any  competition. >

You mean like how your “groomer” husband sexualized you and your underage friends behind a bowling alley. >

Why are republicans so obsessed with fucking children? >

This is the legacy of QAnon. "Everyone I don't like is a pedophile" is now normalized discourse. >

Yup, because indulging themselves in baseless name calling is much more important than whether they're increasing the risk to children by trivializing something that has such indescribably significant impacts on the well being of effected children, nor do they care about how hurtful it is for victims to be constantly confronted and disrupted with this kind of language while they're going about their daily life.
No one indulging themselves in this despicable and harmful behavior gives a fuck about children or victims of pedophilia. >

Widespread destigmatization of casual, false accusations of sexual violence... is going to make it that much harder for real victims to get support. >

The people of Colorado kept this but in business.   Idk how do feel about that…. >

She barely won reelection. It was by less than 600 votes. Let's hope in 2024 she is removed. >

It's their new version of accusing people of being communists >

All they have to say are buzzwords to drum up the base. Meanwhile her husband is a sex offender. >

Her existence is proof of a working democracy: she represents her district well. 
Meanwhile those cooky libs keep re-electing representatives like Harvard Law graduate Katy Porter. >

Coming from someone that's married to a guy that was trying to sexualize children. Even arrested for it.
Makes total sense >

I don't know about others but I'm starting to get concerned over her and the republicans obsession with sexualizing children. They seem rather obsessive and that is all on their minds, the idea of grooming children. All I know is that I would not want any children near people that bring it up as often as they do, it is creepy. >

They love to use trigger words to scare people, that’s the only way they can hang on to whatever base they have left. >

Given how much of what Republicans complain about is projection and they are doing exactly what they complain about this deeply concerns me. >

At a even higher metalevel of language though, Boebert by saying that 'Senators intend the bill to 'sexualise children' is conveying the thought that 'She is not very well and needs a great deal of help' >

Why does diarrhea keep coming out her mouth like this? >

She would know. She is married to an expert in sexualizing children >

Colorado Representative and parrot that WILL bite your finger off, Lauren Boebert. >

Boebert's right!
Sexualizing her children is her husband's job! >

Just like he did to her. Anyway, there are all boys, so I'm sure he'll show them how to respect a woman. >

Her usual projection >

Boebert's Republican talking point sprinkler short circuited as she began accusing senators of wanting to sexualize children. She was later seen wandering the halls randomly blurting "groomer, groomer" until she bumped into a trash can and accidently shut herself off.  Custodial workers wheeled Boebert back to her office strapped to a dolly. >

I wish this to be true. >

Every bit as true as what she typically talks about. >

She’s furious because want someone taking over her husbands brand. >

"Sexualizing children" is one of the new dog whistles. It nicely touches on the memes of both LTBTQ "groomers" and QAnon pedophile cabals, while projecting the common GOP affliction for sexual misconduct with minors onto their political opponents. All in two easy to say words! >

If you were writing an outlandish parody about the US House of Representatives and included this as an idea for an over the top joke about the utter stupidity of a congress person, it would be to stupid to include. She and Greene are in direct competition for who can out stupid trump. >

I had read somewhere, once upon a time, that the Nigerian Prince e-mails were intentionally riddled with bad grammar and poorly constructed to increase the probability of success.  I would like to posit that the GOP is being coached by some think tank like the Heritage foundation to do the same.  The idiocy may be intentional to maximize the grift.  Maybe TFG was so successful because of his functional stupidity.  Maybe it's so hard to peel off his congressional supporters because he is a natural lodestone of blame.  It's all just a huge money laundering scheme and the accountability so far has been limited to the marks.  The J6 committee (Liz) is assuring that it won't go any further than TFG and nobody want to push for more in fear of losing the one big lodestone fish. >

She is just mad because her sons won’t sign up to her onlyfans >

I question the intelligence of the people who voted for this moron again. >

every caustic word out of her grotesque mouth is bizarre. >

The vote passed 68-29. This means that some Republicans voted for it. So, by extension, odds are good that some Senators who voted for this want to sexualize children (see: Republican).
So, technically, she isn't wrong. But the two are completely unrelated- they'd likely sexualize children with or without the omnibus bill. >

Providing support for LGBTQ+ kids is a far cry from trying to sexualize all children but they can't parse the differences because they are actively targeting children with their lies and bullshit. >

Or they are grooming children. >

maybe because she is bizarre. >

Openly hates what she secretly loves? >

Make her speaker of the house.  Seriously.  Let republicans see what their party is all about >

nuts. >

She doesn’t hear anything but dog whistles and can only repeat what she hears. >

I’m still waiting for those “impeachable offenses” she’s always going on about to, you know, exist. >

Isn’t that her husband’s job.  A good man find hard? >

She’s trash >

Just ignore her. Crazy's gonna crazy. And to the people who voted for her... do better. >

This shit is getting hyped. Can we keep the MTG VS. BOBO PPV event still going? I got odds on cro-magnon for the win, long ass knuckle dragging arms. >

Um yeah, she literally just vote against the child sex act… >

There are 163,839 people in Western Colorado that are substantially more stupid than Boebert. >

I've read one page of the comments and you ALL have her buttoned up, perfectly.
I'm in CO, thankfully, not her Congressional District, and the loathing felt for her, whenever she opens her mouth, is a calming and gentle rubbing on my soul.
She's a vapid mouth breather who only regurgitates GOP projectionism; no original thought in her mind. >

Fake issue of the year. They bring that up whether or not it could possibly apply. >

This just in, lauren boebert wants to sexualise children, but you already knew that. It's no wonder her and pedogaetz are such good friends. >

There really needs to be an IQ test to reach certain positions of government >

republicans think about having sex with children more per hour than I do per decade.
it's a complete bullshit distraction tactic so that they aren't called out on their intellectual, moral, and dutiful failures.
the world would be better if everyone who voted GOP just died tomorrow. >

She's a bad joke that isn't even worth mocking. Why is anything she says or does being reported, except for The Onion getting great free copy? >

Ooof. Where is King Aragon to slay some Orcs when you need em. >

Everyone who gets falsely accused of being a groomer, pedo or "sexualizing children" should sue for slander.  It's time to shut these fuckers up like Alex Jones.  I'm so fucking sick of these disgusting bastards in the Republican party.  We should never tolerate this insane slander.  I'm surprised none of those slanderers got punched in the face for making those false accusations. >

"Hey everybody look at me and not Congress meeting with Zelensky or the FPOTUS tax news."
Yeah these articles are completely vacuous. There's nothing more here than an attempt to steal away your attention.
Stop letting them. Tell the publishers to stop reinforcing these people's terrible speech. Give a platform to those who need to be heard whose voices are being drowned out by this shrill and pointless noise.
Stop letting the bullies and rodeo clowns drive the news cycles. >

They always talk this shit then run around with known child molesters