>

I don't think you're wrong.
Many of the sanctions in the US system require more than a majority vote. If the party of the perp shelter them then things break down.
Do both? >

A dark cell away from any traitorous yes men. >

No more excuses. No more 3d chess. He should be arrested and tried. The author suggests that the USSC might intervene in a prison sentence, but not his being barred from running? Absolute nonsense. They are far more likely to prevent his disqualification if he faces no criminal charges. And he will claim exhonoration if no charges are brought. The time has come to choose: do you support democracy or are you an apologist and a coward for a man who would destroy it? >

Yeah but jailing will show that there are consequences for your actions - even for rich people. >

Yeah I still think being in prison curbs your power, and I wanna see that sack of shit behind bars >

It didn’t fit Adolf Hitler or Nelson Mandela 
Both served sentences mid political career and became leaders of their countries after. >

This fat old traitor doesn't have 5 years lol. >

Winces in Kissinger. >

I kinda hope he stays out of jail long enough to face De Santis in the primary and turn those set of supporters against eachother >

Gotta admit, watching BoBo and Empty G going after each other has whet my appetite for some sweet  red on red fighting in the 2024 primary. >

Let them fight. >

We can do both. >

Trump should face justice for the sake of restoration of the rule of law >

From an outsider's perspective surely the point of jailing Trump isn't (directly) to keep him from power but more about holding politicians to account? The US system seems to rely on politicians following the rules but never applying any penalty if politicians break those rules, and it's started occurring to Republicans (mainly) that if there are no penalties for breaking rules then there are, in effect, no rules and have begun acting accordingly.