>

A person who needs a book to tell them not to rape, kill, and steal is a bad person? Shocked!  
EDIT: Jesus fucking Christ on a stick there are so many of you who think we need "the law" or be "told by parents or teachers" not to kill, steal, or rape. Are you guys really that brain dead and can't imagine that humans are capable of feeling compassion? That we can see someone in pain and think "wow that hurts, I don't want to feel that pain so I shouldn't inflict such pain on someone else"????
The fact that so many of you think we need to reference a book to be told "thou shall not steal" with the threat of going to hell or prison to prevent us from doing so is just proving my point.
Sounds like a Scientology tactic. “Noisy investigation.” >

You better delete that comment before Maverick knocks on your door 👀 >

Or Xenu impregnates your volcano....or something like that... probably >

Are volcanoes real in Scientology? >

Bro do you even Thetan? >

I hereby Engram your Dianetics as punishment. >

This guy supresses. >

So, assuming the instructions likely came from a client, will prosecutors try to get him to flip?  Or is illegal behaviour still included under attorney-client privilege in Canada? >

At least in the US, attorney client privilege doesn't apply to the commission of a crime. >

Which is how the J6 committee got a hold of some of the emails from one of Trump's lawyers (John Eastman). >

Yep, a federal judge ruled that a crime was likely committed in relation to those documents. Now that the committee has recommended the DOJ indict, that's 2 of 3 branches of government giving the nod to the DOJ. Let's hope they do their fucking jobs >

Yes, because hope has gotten us so far already......... >

You say that sarcastically, but it’s pretty much all we have to run on anymore ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ >

Or you know organize and actually do something about it. >

LOL at you getting downvoted for suggesting changing things in a comment thread complaining about how bad things are.
I agree, it’s just funny to see the downvotes in a mainstream sub. >

A slimy professional representing a slimy organization to do slimy things. >

Time to tax churches.
All of them.
Currently, only the Satanic church pays taxes. >

They received tax-exempt status in april of 2019 I believe. >

You know, when you read The Satanic Temples info, they're not too bad of a Church.
Edit: I notice I am now getting downvoted for speaking my mind.
I presume I'll get downvoted even more stating I am a Neo-Pagan as well. >

You've got The Satanic Temple confused with the Church of Satan.
The Satanic Temple doesn't believe in Satan. 
"The Satanic Temple does not believe in a supernatural Satan; instead it employs the literary Satan as a metaphor to promote pragmatic skepticism, rational reciprocity, personal autonomy, and curiosity.[8] Satan is thus used as a symbol representing "the eternal rebel" against arbitrary authority and social norms."
What Levay created was the Church of Satan, something totally different. >

The founders of TST have their own issues. >

Please enlighten me >

His name sounds familiar, I wonder if he was the one that was riding on a horse downtown Calgary waving a Trump flag a few years ago. >

If his name sounds familiar, you might also remember him as the member of Alberta’s United Conservative Party that compared a Pride Flag to the Nazi Swastika and Soviet Hammer and Sickle. >

He sounds like a Grade A Asshole. >

There was a time during the height of the pandemic in 2020-21 where conservatives insisted that there would be a large faction of people who refused to try to live their lives and instead live in a covid-obsessed world forever.
They were right, but they didn't realize that they were talking about themselves. >

Never a good idea pay somebody to follow a judge. It was probably to try to catch the judge breaking Covid restrictions of some kind. You gotta know that that’s not gonna win you any points with that judge for any other. My guess would be this guy is going to jail. >

“The Justice Centre is deeply disappointed by the decision of Winnipeg Police to lay a criminal charge for events that took place more than 18 months ago and that are already being dealt with appropriately,” reads the statement, in part.
JFC, these types really do believe they can, and should, be able to whatever the fuck they want don't they?  It reminds me of the video from Ottawa, post convoy, when some moron jumps the security barrier right in front of the cops, while his friends screams "he didn't do anything" as they arrest him...  like really.. >

"I didn't do anything wrong, but if I did it was a lifetime of 18 months ago so you can't really blame me for it." >

That's not even outside the civil Limitations Act in Alberta, and I don't believe there's a prescribed limitation on criminal actions.  I've seen recent cases prosecuted in Alberta where the alleged crime occurred more than 10 years ago. >

There is a 12 month statute of limitations for summary conviction offences (up from 6). There is no statute of limitations on indictable offences in Canada. >

I'm shocked that a Christian would behave this way.  Shocked I tell you.