>

So you would not consider the product of fancy algorithms to be AI? 
I agree term is over used and misused.
Gpt seems like a decent candidate for an AI though. 
What do you think lives up to the term?
Stop using the term "AI" for every little improvement in pattern recognition. JFC >

This isn't that, it's GPT integrated search. 
Which could really challenge Google. >

This is that. GPT is just the next iteration of what Google has been doing for decades. A neural network is just a fancy algorithm. Calling everything AI just devalues the term.