>

Umm they were challenging if Green Party candidate had enough signatures to appear on the ballot in 2018.  That wasn't illegal, even if you believe it was done in bad faith.
This guy is a cartoon character.
There's not one single storyline about him that's not ridiculously outlandish. >

This is pretty on point for the republican party though. Didn't Trump tell like 30,000 verified lies during office alone? >

Yep, just over 30,000 public lies in 4 years, which of course does not include lies he told in private. Which comes out to be at least 20.5 lies a day. >

That... Can't be true, can it?? Like, just mathematically, surely that's way too much?? >

"Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you're a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible." >

This passage reads to me like a very bad impression of Boomhauer from King of the Hill >

Yeah, but that would be downright coherent! >


To stop liars like Santos ever getting into office, out gay Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) said he’ll introduce the Stop Another Non-Truthful Office Seeker (SANTOS) Act. The act would require House candidates to provide details of their backgrounds under oath.

My god, I love this more than I can say. >

So this gives politicians the power to stop people from running for office? That doesn’t sound scary to anyone else? >

If you can’t affirm your financial records and employment history under the penalty of perjury, you shouldn’t run for office. They also have the option to not seat him, but Republicans don’t give a shit. >


They also have the option to not seat him, but Republicans don’t give a shit.

they totally do give a shit, just about winning and only winning. 
“If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.” >

Right, but that's the Democrats, too. GOP attacks voters, Dems attack at the candidate level, ensuring only the vetted are given a chance. Dems in power have kept Green candidates off the ballot illegally. >

Source please