>

so now it will suggest decent extensions when downloading chrome or firefox?
Stop using the term "AI" for every little improvement in pattern recognition. JFC >

This isn't that, it's GPT integrated search. 
Which could really challenge Google. >

This is that. GPT is just the next iteration of what Google has been doing for decades. A neural network is just a fancy algorithm. Calling everything AI just devalues the term. >

So you would not consider the product of fancy algorithms to be AI? 
I agree term is over used and misused.
Gpt seems like a decent candidate for an AI though. 
What do you think lives up to the term? >

An algorithm should never be considered AI because an algorithm is just a set of rules to follow.
Just take a few minutes to think about those two words, Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence should be reserved for a machine that can truly learn beyond any set of rules.
GPT is just an algorithm that's been fed tons of information along with a set of parameters (rules), and as impressive and clever as it is, it does not learn and grow independently of its original design. The term AI is thrown around so recklessly now that everyone has completely lost the real definition. >

I think that's a reasonable argument.
Neural networks do learn though. In a way that's is quite analogous to neural systems. One way of thinking about neural systems like a rodent brain follows a set of rules that unfolds through partially determined neurodevelopmental design principles. Like neural networks realworld neural systems are constrained by, b but not fully determined by their original design. >

"Microsoft wants to make Bing even shittier." Fixed the title. >

The most common search term on Bing is Google. >

Both users will care about this a lot.