>

Isn't he providing the rockets to international space station?
That’s a lot of Twitter ads >

If they removed Elon Musk as owner their value would go up probably >

A year ago I'd have been all in on this, but I can't trust Musk to run a Dairy Queen.  Which sucks because conceptually the mining of asteroids is so fucking lucrative, and the key is to get in early. >

SpaceX runs a hell of a lot more independently from Musk than Tesla. They are responsible to the FAA and the FAA doesn't F around. Practically anyone can build and sell a car, you actually have to prove yourself capable and responsible with the FAA.
They wouldn't be able to get the necessary Govt approvals without that. Gwynne Shotwell is their President and COO and is the one really calling the shots. >

The same FAA that rubber stamped the latest Boeing designs that led to the 737 MAX debacle? Including the part where they substantially changed the design of the plane by installing new types of engines,  did essentially a fancy software patch to address that change,  and concluded all a pilot needed to do to certify on the new plane was like 90 minutes course on an iPad, and the FAA said looks safe to us!  
Where even after 2 fatal incidents the FAA STILL said the plane was safe to fly? Eventually the CHINESE version of the FAA finally had to come out (the irony),  ground the plane in their country,  to finally trigger other regulatory bodies to ground that plane to ultimately force the US FAA to concede that the MAX needed to be grounded. >

Didn't Boeing get charged with Fraud in relation to that? 
After being charged with fraud in connection of both crashes of the 737 MAX, Boeing settled by paying over $2.5 billion: a criminal monetary penalty of $243.6 million (10%), $1.77 billion in damages to airline customers (70%), and $500 million to a crash-victim beneficiaries fund (20%).[62][63] In April 2022, families of U.S. crash victims began petitioning a U.S. federal judge in Texas to scrap the settlement and reopen the criminal case, arguing that the U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act in settling without consulting with the families, and that the USDOJ should not have agreed to shield senior Boeing executives from prosecution. USDOJ prosecutors assert that the settlement is lawful because it cannot be proven that a crime was committed against the crash victims.[64] >

Of course there was fraud. But the fact is this type of fraud would have gotten past the FAA 20 years ago. Along the same vein, Boeing of 20 years ago, lead by ex-engineers who came up their ranks, would have never made such an unsafe plane in the first place.
Basically when Boeing took over the struggling McDonell-Douglas in the late 90s, somehow the ex MD executives, mostly MBAs and bean counters, somehow managed to take over the top positions at Boeing. They were like why are we spending so much money making sure the planes are 99.999999% safe? Why not save that money and make 99.99% safe planes, spend a few million on lobbying to get Boeing friendly regulators appointed to the FAA to rubberstamp those designs, and if 20 years later shit hits the fan and several hundred people die, just pay the government a couple billion dollar fine, admit to zero crimes, and chalk it all up as the cost of doing business?
And that's exactly what happened.
Same deal with the 787, Boeing's other new(er) plane. While it hasn't had a fatal crash yet, a lot of the decisions made during its design and manufacturing was to save money. This includes opening a plant in South Carolina to take advantage of low wage earners there. Problem is those workers have zero aircraft building experience unlike Boeing's veteran workforce in Washington state, and managers were sent out to make sure production targets were top priority over safety or quality. I think the Qatari airline received one and discovered one of the workers had left multitude of trash INSIDE a brand new plane, including like an entire ladder in the tail or something, and they refused any further 787s built in SC, and insisted all future planes ordered by them to be built in Washington. >

The same idiotic mistake as Tesla.  Way too many people thinking Musk is a genius.   The idea of inhabiting Mars is lunacy.  All he has is commercializing satellite communications, which is scary to think a petty narcissist could control global communications.