>

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Proof he is the most to blame for what our government has become over the decades he has been in office. >

That’s really nothing to be proud of anymore. >

The old turtle definitely knows how to play the game. I’ll give him that. >

He’s an amoral power addict but he’s brilliant at playing the political long game. I loathe him but I’ll give the devil his due. >

Proof that if there is a God he/she/it/them is at best indifferent, and probably leaning toward malevolent. >

Senators and Representatives need term limits. >

I’m genuinely curious why people believe this. Isn’t an election enough? If someone is representing people the way they want to be represented, shouldn’t they be able to be elected? >

Then why is there term limits of President of the United States?  Tell me that? >

The legitimate answer to that question is that FDR won so many times in a row that there was a push by republicans to limit the amount of times a president can run so they could actually win.
Executives in other countries don’t have term limits though, which is why Merkel led Germany for so long.
I also don’t think that the president is comparable to a senator or house rep. The president is one individual who possesses a huge amount of authority while a senator/rep is one of many individuals. I can see the logic of limiting someone so powerful the two terms, although I actually disagree with doing that personally. If someone is good at what they are doing and people like them, what is the point of limiting their ability to serve? >

South Korea absolutely has term limits for President. Power should not be consolidated into so few hands for so long. It invites corruption and quid pro quo's.