>

EU can't even defend themselves without the US. World power my ass.
I wonder how much radioactive dust they kicked up at Chernobyl alone. >

That was wild. 
A bunch of Russians digging trenches in the exclusion zone because they didn't learn about Chernobyl in school and probably missed the HBO miniseries, then they all had to go to Belarus for treatment a few weeks later. >

The platoon Sergeant judging the soldiers’ hasty position: not great, not terrible. >

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 78%. (I'm a bot)


Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov said on Monday that Russia violated an article of the 1949 Geneva Conventions by causing around $35 billion in environmental damage in Ukraine amid its ongoing war.
"The damage to the ecology caused by Russia is estimated at $35.3 billion. Millions of hectares of nature preserves are under threat. Article 55 of the Protocol I prohibits waging war VS the natural environment by way of reprisals, but Russia doesn't care," he tweeted.
"Article 55 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, titled Protection of the Natural Environment, reads as follows:"Care shall be taken in warfare to protect the natural environment against widespread, long-term and severe damage.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: environment^#1 Ukrainian^#2 Ukraine^#3 Russia^#4 Convention^#5 >

Nice it’s my cake day >

Fuck it, I’m feeling nice. Have a silver. >

OK.... take a breath..... russia gives zero shits about anything "Geneva Convention" related.  It is obvious to all that russia threw that book in the trash can when they invaded a sovereign country. >

None of the actual world powers give a fuck about Geneva convention. >

Are you low-key accusing EU of not giving a fuck about Geneva convention? Because I have news for you. EU is a world power, a peaceful one right now, but you wouldn't want to mess with them if you aren't USA. And we give a fuck about human rights, ecology etc. Perhaps more than anyone right now.