>

Theft of this act of vandalism has us discussing the blurry line of art. Is that not in itself an act of "art"???
And the thief probably thought they will be rich but it turned out reality is going to be quite different. >

You know...he could just claim to be Banksy himself. That way he isn't actually stealing anything. >

He still damaged private property >

Isn't that Banksy's bit. >

There is no Banksy, it's just a group of people worldwide.
people going around placing a stencil and spraying on colour or just black and white.
easy art, that's why no one sees it being done..that and they do it at night and in places where no one can see it.
and then some fool comes along and and says i'll give you £1,000,000 for that piece of wall!