>

That a person is responsible for every action they take while intoxicated so long as they were not drugged. If someone gives consent while drunk but of course still conscious it is unreasonable to withdraw that consent after the fact on the basis of the alcohol changing the person's behavior.
/u/Objective-Ad-4155 (OP) has awarded 1 delta(s) in this post.
All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >

Thank you that's is insight knowledge. >

In all your examples you provided, depending on the circumstances they could all be found void and no responsibility it's required or not meeting the bar and requiring consideration. >

How likely is could be? >

Varies heavily by circumstances of the specific case, specific strategies employed by both prosecutor and defense and then the judge/laws of the location. 
As with all things in law, it heavily depends. >

How easy would it be for me to talk you into signing a contract if you were blackout drunk? >

Very easy or absolutely impossible depending on my mood. >

Lucky for you and your bank account, contracts signed while impaired are generally considered void because you couldn't consent. >

Is that so? Okay, that seems to add a bit of consistency but there is still this "generally" and all other things that don't fall under that umbrella. Is consent to be considered a spoken contract? I feel one could paint it that way but it'd still be a reach in the face of everything else.
Δ >

You can't sign a contract without consent - a contract signed at gunpoint isn't valid, for instance. >

At would likewise be rape without question. I am not responsible for being held at gunpoint while I am responsible for non contractual actions as has been pointed out to me. This hold water considering autonomy through a legal lens but partially. >

So you agree that there's legal precedent for alcohol making voluntary consent impossible? >

That is a given. The issue is moreso uneven application. >

Please read the title of your CMV, the comment above this, and your response. What are you actually trying to do here? What is actually being argued?