>

Clearly not a fan.
this is why Banksy can't be considered as street art. People will literally take out the walls in streets just to place it in a museum. 
ironically the message behind his pieces are often anti-consumerism >

It is the corniest shit on the fucking planet that there are private Banksy collections that hold exhibitions around the country that make you pay for entry.
The man places his stuff on the street about anti-consumerism for all to see.  Holding (and attending tbh) private exhibits of his work is literally spitting in Banksy's face.
EDIT: Thinking on it more, Banksy clearly comes from an old school graffiti mentality.  I think he'd prefer people cover it up with a bunch of tags, emphasizing the ephemeral nature of street art, than have some wealthy asshole literally cut it out of the wall. >

Reminds me of the Indian rupee notes with Gandhi’s face on them >

Banksy art has value as much for where it is as for what it is. It should not have been removed in the first place. >

It only has value because of the massive PR effort done for him.