>

At would likewise be rape without question. I am not responsible for being held at gunpoint while I am responsible for non contractual actions as has been pointed out to me. This hold water considering autonomy through a legal lens but partially.
/u/Objective-Ad-4155 (OP) has awarded 1 delta(s) in this post.
All comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.
Please note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.
^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards >

Thank you that's is insight knowledge. >

In all your examples you provided, depending on the circumstances they could all be found void and no responsibility it's required or not meeting the bar and requiring consideration. >

How likely is could be? >

Varies heavily by circumstances of the specific case, specific strategies employed by both prosecutor and defense and then the judge/laws of the location. 
As with all things in law, it heavily depends. >

How easy would it be for me to talk you into signing a contract if you were blackout drunk? >

Very easy or absolutely impossible depending on my mood. >

Lucky for you and your bank account, contracts signed while impaired are generally considered void because you couldn't consent. >

Is that so? Okay, that seems to add a bit of consistency but there is still this "generally" and all other things that don't fall under that umbrella. Is consent to be considered a spoken contract? I feel one could paint it that way but it'd still be a reach in the face of everything else.
Δ >

You can't sign a contract without consent - a contract signed at gunpoint isn't valid, for instance.