>

Not really, jets and air power is so effective it takes out a lot of the needs to for tanks, but morale boosts are huge
“Thanks, but no tanks..”

Zelensky >

🤣 >

Abrams wont be that useful anyway for Ukraine. They’ll be a burden. Gas turbine engines which are extremely thirsty and tanks which require consistent and reliable logistics to send in spare parts because Abram’s will break down and they’ll need a lot of maintenance. And then they’ll need their own specialist recovery vehicles given their immense weight compared to tanks Ukraine already has. Ukraine will also need western pontoon bridges and other support infrastructure to be able to support and facilitate transport of these tanks. It’s a huge undertaking.
It won’t be that easy either with leopards and challengers but some of the problems are mitigated and it’s worth it >

I have to wonder if they'd even be useful for the US if ever in a land war.