>

Interesting story and it seems his ideals them  on a staffer now representative
"reasonable viewpoint-neutral limitations " - This, right here, would be about 40 years of legal challenges.
n:

4 
‘‘ARTICLE —
5 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress and the States may regulate
6 and impose reasonable viewpoint-neutral limitations on the
7 raising and spending of money by candidates and others
8 to influence elections.
9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress and the States may regulate
10 and enact systems of public campaign financing, including
11 those designed to restrict the influence of private wealth
12 by offsetting the raising and spending of money by can13 didates and others to influence elections with increased
14 public funding.
15 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress and the States shall have
16 power to implement and enforce this article by appropriate
17 legislation, and may distinguish between natural persons
18 and corporations or other artificial entities created by law,
19 including by prohibiting such entities from spending
20 money to influence elections.
21 ‘‘SECTION 4. Nothing in this article shall be con22 strued to grant Congress or the States the power to
23 abridge the freedom of the press.’’.

Full Bill and Article Text [PDF] >

Couldn’t they have done this while they had control of congress and the White House?
Edit - I’m dumb. >

2022 >

about time >

They do it every year >


Jim McGovern

The writers are really getting desperate for names this season. >

It’s not a unique name in American politics. George McGovern was the Dem nominee for President against Nixon in ‘72. 
While Jim is not related to George, Jim staffed for the elder McGovern as a college student.