>

That shootings won't happen because naturally EVERYWHERE there's some heavily armednutjob willing to risk his life to take them down. It's a very common anti gun control argument that ignores that despite the united states' having more guns per Capita than anywhere else armed public response to an active shooter is a fraction of a percent of all shootings resolution
You have to be a special kind of asshole to attack people who dedicate their life to save others. >

It's a new era where pathetic, loser psychopaths go after the easiest targets. In America, our terrorist go after schools, churches and casual public because they're the least defensive; perfect for cowards. Calling emergency workers and attacking them just seems generally lazy ontop of psychotic. Whole worlds going to shit. >

I mean, cool, but one in how many? >

Doesn't matter. If it happens once that's all the validation they need and bo amount of facts and reality will change their minds. >

Change his mind about what? What statement was he making besides “this guy was a badass”?