>

Totally agree.
Uh... He gave insurrectionists positions on Homeland security oversight committees. Dudes in on the entire shit storm. >

FUCK NEW YORK POST
They and every right-wing outlet are partially responsible for garbage like santos getting elected, and now they're trying to profit off a problem they helped create.
We need to stop rewarding them with upvotes for clickbait headlines. They still exist to get people to vote their rights away, and still hate you if you don't vote GOP. >

They want to be just right wing enough to remain in acceptable society. I suspect since the insurrection they’ve seen the cocktail party invites dwindle. Much like Jared and Ivanka, they want to be cool with the actual cool crowd again, and not with the crowd that actually worships them. >

I personally  think they know they've  lost control  of the foot soldiers and are becoming  irrelevant to the point they can no longer marshal  them effectively. >

I completely agree they’ve crossed that threshold. Even to the point of fear for the Repubs who have any sense. The problem is, the qult grift gig is so lucrative, the marks so gullible, there’s always a replacement grifter when the original one tries to introduce sanity. 
And every new one is much worse than the one before. In this game, the fundamental object is to be the nuttiest nut. That’s where the money is. Hard to say whether the Gingriches, Carlsons, Murdochs, Ryans and McCarthys didn’t realize the money would trump the leadership, or just didn’t care, I don’t know. >

McCarthy is beyond hope. He is the classic manager who wanted to be manager but has no idea how to manage. He has become Speaker (thanks to backroom deals) but doesn't have a clue how to govern. >

To me, this means our government sponsors lying on resumes. People can now say whatever on their resumes and companies just have to put up with it. It'll be really interesting to see how further down hill this all goes >

First I hate the buzz words used. Second I love your point, interviews moving forward are going to be wild and we're going to see a lot more "presidents of companies". >

I mean, Santos went as far as having people pose as other people so who's to say that doesn't happen for more people too >

Totally agree. >

I don't see why our Congress doesn't have the same rules as every other organization: if someone comes to find that you lied or over-exaggerated on your skill set/resume then you're automatically disqualified and fired.  This POS has no reason being in Congress.  What if he were a serial killer or a rapist or some other vile perpetrator?  Would McCarthy still cater to this parasite?  Goes to show just how criminal the GOP has become.  If this guy is not removed then I hope there are at least a few morally upstanding Republicans who would threaten McCarthy with a change to Independent or Democrat.  Eff his agenda and his party - our country takes precedent before any of these low lifes. >


I hope there are at least a few morally upstanding Republicans

Maybe in real life, not in congress. >

Who did Santos piss off at the NY Post? This is at least the third negative article about him I've seen posted today...
Not something I would expect from the Nazi Post. >

It may or may not have to do with a certain type of clothing he chose to wear at one point, and it wasn't a tan suit >

Don't worry they'll appoint him to the ethics committee >

GOP need to stop complaining about drag queens, they have one of their own. >

I really want to see how they handle that. There's pictures and video. So they'll either go hard in claiming it's fake or they'll really have to twist some words and let Rupert Goebbels and co take care of it. 
I know hypocrisy is their forte, but this is like their #1 boogeyman and now they have a prolific one in their ranks. I bet they'll claim "he's changed" or some other bs. >

There is no shame among anyone in the GQP or its supporters anymore.  And he and the GQP are complicit in the big lie, the reduction to women's and LGBTQ rights, and the destruction of education in 'merica. >

Republicans sat this dude "to own the libs," and he's now just stinking up the place.  It's not a bad thing to throw out your trash so your House don't stink.  It's actually quite civilized. >

Couldn't Santos then instantly call for a vote to get McCarthy removed as speaker, before anything happens? >

Anthony Devolder gives off the creepiest vibes. All of this other stuff is going to seem like nothing once the real truth about him comes out >

I think we’ve seen the penalty for fraud when it comes to these people. He has nothing to worry about, legally speaking. >

I read this heading and all I can think is McCarthy saying “ yeah,and?  That’s a problem? >

This isn't fair. 
Pinocchio eventually stopped lying >

He can't do that, and doesn't want to. The Democratic governor of NY would get to appoint his replacement. >

No, he’s not a senator. It’ll be a special election. >

Thanks. >

This is only the beginning of massive fraud that McTraitor plans to unleash. >

“Quit”
“No” >

I remember seeing a headline when Tiger Woods cheated on his wife and it says, "Tiger says he's sorry, but Elin says 'Beat it, bozo!'" No, she did not. She is from another country. And even if she was from this country, no one has said "bozo" in 1,000 years. Who was your source on that, New York Post? Some tiny old lady that chain smokes all day long?
They met her in a parking garage and they were like, "Madge, give us the scoop! What did Elin say to Tiger?"
"Eh, she told him to 'beat it, bozo.'" >

The post hasn't figured out McCarthy is shameless, just like them. >

He's already complicit. Santos tried to impersonate his staff head before he was elected. McCarthy knew all about Santos and did nothing. Then he rewarded him with committee assignments, all for the reason we know so well: own the libs. >

Reporters showing time & time again that they have no real understanding of American politics. There is no hypocrisy that will stop them. Embarrassment is not a relevant concept. His entire goal is fraud, a little extra fraud won't ruin his sleep >

They are both Russian plants…. >

He’s already a complete fraud… >

Uh... He gave insurrectionists positions on Homeland security oversight committees. Dudes in on the entire shit storm. >

Fourteenth Amendment, 
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. >

What a shame the Democrats never enforced that in the last 2 years. Missed a chance to reclaim our government. At least they funded port revitalization while controlling Congress and the Oval Office. >

FUCK NEW YORK POST
They and every right-wing outlet are partially responsible for garbage like santos getting elected, and now they're trying to profit off a problem they helped create.
We need to stop rewarding them with upvotes for clickbait headlines. They still exist to get people to vote their rights away, and still hate you if you don't vote GOP. >

They want to be just right wing enough to remain in acceptable society. I suspect since the insurrection they’ve seen the cocktail party invites dwindle. Much like Jared and Ivanka, they want to be cool with the actual cool crowd again, and not with the crowd that actually worships them. >

I personally  think they know they've  lost control  of the foot soldiers and are becoming  irrelevant to the point they can no longer marshal  them effectively. >

I completely agree they’ve crossed that threshold. Even to the point of fear for the Repubs who have any sense. The problem is, the qult grift gig is so lucrative, the marks so gullible, there’s always a replacement grifter when the original one tries to introduce sanity. 
And every new one is much worse than the one before. In this game, the fundamental object is to be the nuttiest nut. That’s where the money is. Hard to say whether the Gingriches, Carlsons, Murdochs, Ryans and McCarthys didn’t realize the money would trump the leadership, or just didn’t care, I don’t know. >

McCarthy is beyond hope. He is the classic manager who wanted to be manager but has no idea how to manage. He has become Speaker (thanks to backroom deals) but doesn't have a clue how to govern. >

To me, this means our government sponsors lying on resumes. People can now say whatever on their resumes and companies just have to put up with it. It'll be really interesting to see how further down hill this all goes >

First I hate the buzz words used. Second I love your point, interviews moving forward are going to be wild and we're going to see a lot more "presidents of companies". >

I mean, Santos went as far as having people pose as other people so who's to say that doesn't happen for more people too