>

And we cannot prosecute a sitting president even if what they did was illegal. Isn’t that what we decided, that the president was infallible?
Think of it sort of like blockbuster.
Two guys rented out movies and neither of them brought them back. One guy took 100 movies and never returned them. The other took 15 movies and did not return them.
One guy found them later and was like oh man, I need to return these and pay the late fees. Took them back, and ponied up.
The other dude not only kept them but let other people watch them. No only did he know he had them he called his Attorney and had them say they did not have them. Then when they came to get them said they did not have them. Then when they got a search warrant to come get them raised holy hell about how picked on he was. Then they asked like 10 more times to give them back he lied some more and they found more of course. He refuses to pay late fees, he refuses to take responsibility, he claims they are his, he claims they were planted, he claims they were for bragging rights, he might still have some more...he might have made copies and sold them.
But yes these are both the same. >

Scenario A: Hey, neighbor. I just realized I completely forgot to return your shovel after I borrowed it. It’s just been sitting in my garage and I only discovered it this morning when I was looking for something else. I’m really sorry. Here’s your shovel back. 
Scenario B: Shovel? What shovel? I don’t have your shovel. I gave that back. Yes I did. Fine I’ll look in my garage. I just checked - no shovel. You say you know your shovel is in there? Well, uh, okay. I’ll give your shovel back but only if you give me your rake. No? Then fuck you. It’s my shovel. No. It’s mine. What do you mean you’re just going to take it? Stop! Stop taking my shovel!! Hey, everyone! This asshole just violated the sanctity of MY GARAGE and took his shove … I mean took MY shovel!! The nerve of that guy! >

In Scenario B, he was holding the shovel when he answered the door and the neighbor is pointing at the shovel that has “Flanders” written on the handle in black sharpie marker.  “That shovel right there!” >

And we cannot prosecute a sitting president even if what they did was illegal. >

The fact that the 5 year Statute of Limitations means it is not criminal even if it could have been, should be mentioned more. >

Wouldn’t merely having them illegally mean the theoretical crime was happening constantly till they were discovered. 
I may be wrong but the issue is both taking and having the documents so while he may be safe from when he took em he still had them till recently >

He is currently the President and is allowed to have them. >

he wasn’t president 2 years ago