>

They are not socially conservative in that kind of way. The RSS, arguably BJPs mother party was vocal in its support for the LGBT.
It's the Muslim community and a select few anglicised Hindu communities that will mostly be in opposition.
It will probably pass, the main hurdle comes from govt . Because they are trying to stay away from this issue so it won't hurt their ballots. They won't stop it but they won't encourage it either. They will let people fight over it. Truest form of democracy ironically lol. >

I can't wait I hope it will be legal in India even though I'm not Indian. >

You have to a be a real loser of a human being to be against us marrying. >

That's the thing. I don't think they are against gay people marrying. The SC right now is full of extremely progressive people.
It's just a legal hangup. The question is does the SC have the right to declare marriage legal. If not, can it command Parliament to pass a law. 
Besides Indian legal law is fractured based on different communities. So it gets complex. Should there be a separate law under which people should get married or should it be included in community laws. The former will be fine but the latter will involve a lot of resistance and further legal complications. >

Pretty sure that it'll be covered under the special marriage act, and not under religious marriage rules. Good luck with the latter >

Yeah. It's much simpler with the SMA. >


A ruling that finds gay marriages are allowed under India’s constitution would run counter to the socially conservative sentiment of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, as well as wide swaths of the country’s Muslim community. 

I am all in for legalizing same-sex marriage.
Kill (or hurt, the least)  two ugly birds with one stone.