>

The Biden admin will withhold federal funding to areas that fail to comply. 
I don't personally know what kind of funding will be withheld though have article doesn't say.
For those who don't want to click the article:

The Biden administration is restoring a rule that will require cities, counties and states that receive federal housing funds to examine patterns of residential segregation within their borders and take steps to uproot them, a mandate that was first established by civil rights–era legislation but has proved almost impossible to enact. >

The best next step would be to have congress give this teeth, or maybe temporarily boost it with an EO with funding and/or consequences for inaction.
There's gotta be something to spur action to curb this - maybe forcing the municipality to fund additional housing projects or something. But just reading this blurb, yea, seems hard af to enforce. >

I disagree, the next best step would be to ban landlords from conducting tenant screenings that use credit and background checks as a cover for discrimination, and force all landlords to accept any tenant that has the money to cover move-in cost.
Also force all landlords to accept section 8 >

Okay, but how would you suggest accomplishing this? Aside from the debt ceiling, blues and reds are oil and water. And even then! 
So what could Biden do to move your proposal? That sounds like a congressional act as I read it. >

trump: "I saved the suburbs. Women should thank me."
translation: "I kept black rapists away from our pure white women." >

We should abolish the suburbs. Throw out the stupid zoning laws that force SFH developments >

wow based >

Said the man who tries to abolish the middle class. >

The middle class is stronger under democrats than republicans >

For those who don't want to click the article:

The Biden administration is restoring a rule that will require cities, counties and states that receive federal housing funds to examine patterns of residential segregation within their borders and take steps to uproot them, a mandate that was first established by civil rights–era legislation but has proved almost impossible to enact. >

The best next step would be to have congress give this teeth, or maybe temporarily boost it with an EO with funding and/or consequences for inaction.
There's gotta be something to spur action to curb this - maybe forcing the municipality to fund additional housing projects or something. But just reading this blurb, yea, seems hard af to enforce.