>

They don't have to disclose for 30 days (or 45 if it is a spouse) and late disclosure is common and virtually unpunished. Copying them isn't going to be wildly beneficial because you are copying their answers after the benefits of doing so are gone.
"...shame Congress..."  Anybody else think that's not going to be a winning plan? >

About 20 years ago? Maybe. Its been a while since that was a thing. >

Is the aim really to shame them? They're going to make a fuckton of money. >


90% of it is a product that performs well and 10% of it is shaming >

Yeah that makes more sense. >

This is genius. 
Forget about shaming them. Clearly, this is simply the best way to invest. >

Insider trading without being an insider >

How can you shame people that have none? >

Won’t work . They get insider information weeks in advance. We only find out after the fact . >

But if you follow their trades, you don't act on insider information. You act on the fact that they have insider information.