>

I think people need to agree what constitutes “addictive”.
Because too often, the same people will argue that coffee is addictive and alcohol is addictive, but marijuana isn’t because “it doesn’t have nicotine!”
If it releases dopamine in your brain, it can be addictive.  Caffeine isn’t an “addictive” chemical, but you can get addicted to the dopamine release.  Same with alcohol.
And absolutely definitely the same with marijuana.  You can argue that there aren’t any addictive chemicals in it, but you still get addicted to the dopamine release and the other pleasant effects from its use.
Depends on the stoner. You can consume alcohol without being an alcoholic, you can consume cannabis without being addicted to it as well. 
But there are stoners that can't function without it, and end up getting so high they can't function on it either, and they should realize they have a problem and seek help. >

The difference is someone who casually uses doesn't identify themselves as a stoner. The same way someone who enjoys the occasional drink doesn't identify themselves as an alcoholic. >

I think people need to agree what constitutes “addictive”. >

It's literally a scientific term >

People deny Marijuana addiction, which is ridiculous.
Its not really taken seriously. >

Same boat. We dont do because it sucks not to >

Dude, you can’t even admit you’re addicted to booze and caffeine. You “can overindulge”. How many rounds of mental gymnastics did it take to come up with that one? 😂 >

That’s my favorite part of the post. Whether intentionally or not, OP literally fails to not be a hypocrite in the FIRST sentence lol