>

Is this a real person? Every headline I see just sounds like the Onion
I said this elsewhere but if an AI generated person wins an election within the next decade, I wouldn't be surprised. >

This guy feels like an AI-generated asshole >

Yeah, apparently the AI chatbot has learned to gaslight us. >

Wasn't there a twitter AI that immediately became a neo-nazi? >

I think it was a Microsoft AI, and pretty much. I think within the day it was spewing racial insults. >

Yeah it was but Microsoft but trained on Twitter >

This fuckin guy is Jon Lovitz's Pathological Liar incarnate >

Yeah...that's the ticket!
I like the assholes who defend him with the completely disingenuous argument of "everybody lies".  Yes, everyone lies, but not all the time about everything to this insane degree.  It's like claiming all speeding is equal, like going 75 in a 70 is the same as doing 75 in a 25 zone. >

‘Everybody lies’ is such a cop out. 
Like when people say “I’m a bitch, and I’ve told you that so…” like it gives them an excuse to be awful. 
I tell these people “That’s like saying ‘I’m an axe murderer, and I’ve told you, so if I murder you with an axe that’s on you’” >

And the classic Whataboutism
“Alright, look, I may be an axe murderer, but come on, look what Assad’s doing!” >

Some of you assholes out there voted for this guy. >

In a Biden +10 district too. New York Democrats completely dropped the ball last November and it cost us the House majority. >

Notice how when specific blame is assigned, it's Democrats.
When generalized blame is assigned, it's "Politicians".  As noted by the other top reply chain.
Republicans are so beyond consequence even general conversation online no longer holds them accountable.  Either the Dem's can be blamed, or it's the government as a whole that's evil... Republicans are just a natural force though and we don't talk about them directly because they trained us that makes us sound "biased". >

True... and not. There is lots and lots of blame that goes around about Republicans.
The issue is largely that Dems criticize each other non-stop. Republicans criticize Dems. Republicans never criticize themselves. So dems get 2x, Reps get 1x and the media couldn't give a fuck about reality because reality doesn't drive views. >

Well of course. But thats not how its presented by the media because the media doesn't care about reality.
They talked about Hillarys emails and Benghazi for 10 fucking years but when both situations happened to Trump it was in the narrative for like 2 god damn days. >

No shit...pretty much hard evidence that he stole top secret documentation and sold it to russian agents....literally NOTHING done about it and the media fucking ignoring it only a few days later. >

They are tracking all the docs. Anyone dumb enough to work with trump is dumb enough to lead CIA to their secret base. >

Ivanka’s all up in your base, in your base >

No Donald >

"And never have I ever pulled the sweater over an old woman's head so I could take her walker and pawn it for whipits money on a Tuesday in Louisiana, and never have I ever..." >

Here is the full report:
"I did not swindle a disabled veteran while his dog died of a tumor" were the first words spoken by controversial figure George Santos upon entering the fast food establishment "Wendy's". 
Witnesses who were at the restaurant at around nine and a half in the morning claim the rebuttal towards these allegations was "unpromted" and "frankly, strangely specific". After the initial statement, Santos went up to order while verbalizing his innocense of other behaviors which no one was accusing him off; according to a confused bystander.
George Santos is quoted as saying "I did not kick a blind man's walking stick out of his hand"; "I did not poison all of the strawberry jam donuts during a christmas party"; and "I have never in my life planted pressure triggered explosive mines below the entrance of 7 different orphanages in a single night".
When interviewed, the worker who was attending customers at the moment recalls having to remind Mr. Santos that he was in fact within a fast food restaurant ran by the Wendy's brand, after which George Santos reportedly walked out of the establishment while seeming flustered.
"It was very uncomfortable." Said a woman who had seen the exchange.
"I just don't understand why he would do those things, children are dead now." Adds another witness.
"I think there was some hair in my burger, the kitchen staff should be more careful" commented another attendee.
All of the staff present that morning was comprised exclusively by bald Armenian men in their 40s. >

Sir, this is a Wendy's >

The most literal use of the phrase in context I've ever heard irl. This fucking world ceases to bemuse me. >

Yup, shame no one recorded it. Apparently someone tried to but they mistakenly pointed the camera towards themselves and covered their phone's microhpone with their finger so the only recording of this event is just an old man frowning and slowly eating fries for three minutes with muffled sounds in the background. >

Now THAT'S a reaction video I can get behind. 🤷‍♂️ >

There's two things that always fucking astound me. 
1: How someone so cartoonishly evil exists in the first place. 
2: How the Republican party finds them without fail and gives them power. >

The Republican party is known for protecting their own no matter what. It's also where the most unethical businesses in America like to spend most of their money. So it's not much that the Republican party finds these people, more that they're attracted to it like flies are attracted to shit. 
And before someone accuses me of being a partisan hack, yes, Democrats are also corrupt, but they're a lot more subtle about it. >

Republicans point fingers at Democrats in general calling them groomers and pedos, yet they have Gaetz and Boebert the lady who married a man who exposed himself to underage girls and assaulted Boebert.  They do not care about children unless they can be used. >

Never forget that Gaetz was the only person in Congress who voted against an anti human trafficking bill in 2017 >

He’s making it easy. Anything he denies doing, you know for a fact the opposite is true. >

Sounds like someone is gearing up to be the 2024 GOP presidential pick. >

Read that as prick >

I think Santos was recruited by the Republican Party to act as a purposeful distraction.  They researched his back story, realized that he's not just a compulsive liar, but a compulsive liar whose lies are so absurd that whenever conservatives want to pass some horrible new law, they throw the media a bone from their "George Santos Crazy Shit" file knowing that it will buy them a news cycle.
Basically, my theory is that, metaphorically, the rest of the Republicans are stealing your car behind you in broad daylight, but you can't take your eyes of the naked man furiously masturbating while doing back-flips and juggling axes in the other direction. >

This is it. This is why they bitch about transgenders in the bathroom, CRT, and other culture war bullshit. The crazy gets the clicks while they silently pass bills that destroy our lives. >


pass bills

Lol >

So he probably did it more than once? >

He’s only swindle-ish >

so, a denial - well there it is then, absolute confirmation that Santos did in fact swindle a disabled veteran while their dog died of a tumor. >

Keep reading the article.. the disabled veteran was homeless and the dog was a service animal named Sapphire. 
The veteran wound up panhandling to get enough money to have Sapphire euthanized and cremated. 
I have no words adequate to express my feelings about Santos. >

Even if half these accusations are false the guy is a real piece of shit >

Good news - I have zero doubt all the accusations are true, and these are just the ones we know about. This shithead is a superstar GOP dude. >

What a piece of shit. >

Of all the things the things he had done and all the lie he said this one is the most disgusting he did. >

It's like Mad Libs with this guy. >

Kickstarter idea right here. >

But if he did, he could bring those skills to the small business committee he now sits on >

Does any of this matter? It's not like politicians are held accountable for anything. So why not lie, cheat, and steal to get what they want? >

They might get him on the 700k loan to his campaign. He definitely didn’t have 700k to loan, so someone very dirty came up with it. >

I'll believe it when I see it. Politicians are almost as protected as cops. >

Almost? >

I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if someone punched this dude in the face. >

I would be. Mtg, Norbert, gaetz, gosar, Jordan all have intact noses. >

At this point, the staff for his primary and general election opponents should never get hired again.  How do you miss an entire history being fabricated until after the election. >

He seems to have a gift for finding the things nobody would ever think someone would lie about. >

This guy is trying to become the speaker of the house. >

Waiting for the video or email of Santos doing exactly what he denied doing.
my favourite part of the Trump years:
News:"Trump did this, source says"
Tump: no I didn't.
News:"source has video/email"
Tump: no he doesnt
News: "email/video verifying what we said is real" 
Tump : whatever on that video/email isn't as bad as they say it is.
News: "email/video released, it's worse than they said it is".
Tump: something more outrageous that makes us forget the last outrage. >

At this point his existence as a human should be questioned >

I love it. Drip, drip, drip. Every day something new. I bet McCarthy is getting pressured to do something, but his balls have been legislatively removed. >

Lol republicans don’t give AF are you kidding? >

OP must be a centrist Dem >

I'm pretty sure that dude has antisocial personality disorder(sociopath). That blank expressionless stare with those dead eyes, the pathological lying, the repeated stories of him doing heartless shit to people, bragging about taking advantage of people and showing no remorse. He should not be in any sort of position of power, that motherfucker is dangerous. >

its safe to say that u r better believing the opposite of what he says