>

You can't shame people who feel no shame to begin with.
"...shame Congress..."  Anybody else think that's not going to be a winning plan? >

About 20 years ago? Maybe. Its been a while since that was a thing. >

Is the aim really to shame them? They're going to make a fuckton of money. >


90% of it is a product that performs well and 10% of it is shaming >

Yeah that makes more sense. >

This is genius. 
Forget about shaming them. Clearly, this is simply the best way to invest. >

Insider trading without being an insider >

How can you shame people that have none? >

Won’t work . They get insider information weeks in advance. We only find out after the fact . >

But if you follow their trades, you don't act on insider information. You act on the fact that they have insider information. >

They don't have to disclose for 30 days (or 45 if it is a spouse) and late disclosure is common and virtually unpunished. Copying them isn't going to be wildly beneficial because you are copying their answers after the benefits of doing so are gone.