>

I'd rather see them booking the crooks
All those fucks should be rolled up into one giant bribery rico case. It is obvious that this hotel was just a front to kick up money to the boss. >

Too bad the supreme court's opinion on brides is you are only guilty of it if there is authenticated video of you accepting large burlap sacks of cash with $$$ printed on the side. >

A bag could have anything in it. You also need to say "I accept your illegal cash bribe, which I know is illegal and wrong" while looking directly at the camera for positive identification. >

While grandma is over in the corner confirming the person's identity while nodding and smiling. >

And the guilty verdict involves a fine lower than the amount in the bag. As is tradition. >

We have to keep things profitable. >

It's the American way. >

This is the way >

My gop state gov spent over $20000 of tax payer money there.  So much his own office flagged it as excessive.  Of course it was a money laundering/ bribe thing. >

Oh, but Trump donated his salary, yada, yada, yada. >

It turns out he didn’t donate his salary according to his tax returns. >

He totally donated it - just didn't want the tax write-off. /s >

Doonesbury called it in 2017. >

Cooking the books