>

Just bc we play by (and within) the rules against known cheats, does not mean we can't fight back.
Edit: my point is that if you compromise your principles bc the other side is willing to do so, you've already lost.
McCarthy stripped Swalwell of his committee positions and called the California Democrat a “security threat” due to his link to a suspected Chinese spy.

But pay no attention to the known russian spy who infiltrated the nra and other high gop circles. >

swalwell bad, santos good - gop >

Need some accountability laws here.  Threats are 'real' and should have consequences. >

Indeed.  The attack on Paul Pelosi a prime example of the violence due to venom and hate that has become common language among the GOP and its water carriers like Fox News.  Not only that but the lies purported as truths used to amplify it.  Trump led the way in coarse and hate on a new level of public messages from a political leader.  
It is time for some long overdue changes.
Edited misspelled word >

They know. And they're smirking about it. They're counting on good people to play by the rules and not fight back.