>

Not to mention the risk of getting outed in a place where accessibility to guns is rampant Republicans have the added benefit of an increased risk of suicide
I would end up having to quit my job because i would never out a minor. I grew up in a Mormon family that was very transphopic and anti gay i saw first hand how cruel and mean families can be. >

I'm not saying you did the wrong thing (especially since I believe you didn't), but I think it's a sign of an adverse effect that's taking place in education in all red states right now. They're suffering brain drain because of their harsh, draconian laws, and it's all part of the GOP strategy to make a social institution non-functional so that they can privatise it and make money off of it. They're doing this in a concerted effort to replace public schooling with private schooling, and as we all know, attacking education and the educated is one of the first things all fascist regimes do. It scares me how many of my countrymen can't see the glaringly obvious signs going on in the GOP. >

If it weren't the school's, they'd find another lever to pull. The red states are on a path to theocratic rule and the best all sane people can do is get out of those states while they can. Unfortunately, all we can really do is batten down the hatches and let the fascist shit burn out. >

A better plan would be organized blue immigration into red states to tip the vote to Democrats there. If the nut jobs keep adding more states to their control, they not only have the senate and presidency but can do a constitutional convention... >

If money weren't an object, I would fund a nonprofit to encourage remote tech workers to move to Wyoming and the Dakotas. It would take around 400K people to flip all 3 states. 9 electoral votes and 6 Senate seats (this is the real prize). >

Why don't liberal tech company owners do this? It seems so easy and relatively cheap. >

To be fair, how is the infrastructure in Wyoming for remote work? My guess is that it'll need to be developed to support the higher bandwidth usage of a large remote workforce before this is really viable, and it seems like the impetus for that would fall on the ISPs and/or companies wanting to move their people since the state government would likely be hostile to such a plan. >

There isn't any. It helps keep the liberals out. >


Critics of North Carolina's Parents Bill of Rights say it's harmful to LGBT students and could be used to ban books or put students in harm at home. Supporters say it's needed to stop inappropriate discussions of sexuality or gender at school, and to stop children from keeping secrets from their parents.

​
So, they are admitting they are trying to forcefully make kids comply and forbid them from being actual persons, with autonomy?
​
This is something the Westboro Baptist Church would co-sign. What the hell? >

I hate that last fucking line. If parents are fucking abusers, kids should keep secrets from them. Fuck these assholes. They just want more Matthew Shepards. They can't beat and kill gay kids, so they want there to be no safety or privacy so that other people will do the dirty work for them. >

If parents are abusers, Republicans are hoping they will punish their children for being gay. The cruelty is the point with Republicans