>

The shooting wasn't caught on body cam..how the fuck is that possible
On Wednesday, Jan. 25, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation announced that a special prosecutor will be assigned to review the case, but critics are calling for an independent investigation.  

Cops lie so I agree with the critics. >

Cops are some of the least trustworthy people in the country. I wouldn't believe a word they say, especially when it comes to police shootings. They'll lie right to your face even when there's clear video evidence that they are lying. They know you know they are lying and still don't care. >

I took a traffic ticket to court and watched the cop tell three lies to the judge. Over a traffic ticket. So just imagine when it comes to assaults and murders. >

It wasn’t really about the ticket, it was about his ego and “authority”. >

These mofo's tried to give me a ticket for speeding in a school zone on the I-5 highway. >

55 in a 54 >

Failure to signal a lane change. On a one-way, one lane road… This actually happened to me, I went before the judge, and the judge backed the officer.  I’ve always thought this was an hilarious example. >

so... which lane did you change from and into if its a single lane one-way road? >

The funny thing is, I was actually following the officer. He pretty much ran a stop sign to merge onto the one-way street. And there was also a cop behind me. So the cop in front of me turned his lights on and I really didn’t know what was going on, but he’s the one that got me I don’t even know what to say. >

Got pulled over by a cop I recognized as a drop out in HS... he asked me for my license I asked him for his HS diploma... NOT the smartest thing I said. Not sure why I said it but I told him I was joking. He told me he went into the military and I asked when he went AWOL... good times... PS I got a ticket and fought it in court and he didn't show!!!!  I want SOOOO bad to have put in court record that the cop did not graduate HS and I question his ability to read the speedometer. >

I wonder how bad it'll be in 20 years. >

Well we got three main options
1.) the GOP gets full control and the police go on to be the arm of an authoritarian regime
2.) conservative dems remain in power and the problem slowly gets worse over time… let’s be optimistic and say that the Supreme Court hasn’t eliminated due process in this timeline
3.) we pull a competent, progressive miracle out of thin air (and also discover unicorns) >

2020 showed 3 would never happen. Burnie and other actually progressive candidates were gaining traction and the Democratic Party was quick to fall in line behind "more of the same" Biden.
Also we have unicorns, they are just fat and gray and we call them "Rhinos". >

If Bernie can only get 35-40% of the vote in a one on one and broke 50% once (Vermont)...how strong truely are progressives >

yes, this is the point they were making. Progressives can't get ahead because dems fall in line behind the party.
IIRC, Bernie was the front runner until the rest of them dropped from the primary and endorsed Biden. >

So Sanders was taking advantage of a fractured field and when the moderates and establishment wised up and consolidated (which is smart politics), he got wrecked.  Seriously, if Sanders couldn't get close to Biden one one one, he didn't deserve the nomination. >

oh, i see, you have no intent to argue in good faith.
have a nice day then.
it seems your point was actually 'bernie couldn't beat the establishment', which is sadly true. but the way you framed it made it seem like he was unfavorable, when it was the opposite.
imagine how different things would have gone if those endorsements went to him instead of biden. the game was rigged. >

That's literally politics. It's not arguing in bad faith either. Bernie couldn't beat Biden 1 on 1 showing that voters follow more moderate thinking. >

Bernie is the more moderate candidate though, at least when compared to the world. >

He wasn't running in the rest of the world now was he? >

The United States is now at the point where we are openly executing climate activists and labeling the ones who live as domestic terrorists for committing the unspeakable crime of wanting to have a planet to live on. >

Let me guess you're one of those lying cops that can't get away with shit as easily now, huh? So you defend a bunch of overpaid scared pieces of shit every chance you get, huh? >

What would make me think that? The fact that murdering cops are actually being punished now?
You simply ignoring that fact because it doesn't fit your narrative isn't my problem.
I don't defend murdering cops, I defend cops that shoot someone whose shooting at them.
Just like I'd defend you if you happen to shoot a guy whose shooting at you. >

What facts? You presented none. 
NO ONE WAS SHOOTING AT THEM. UNTIL PROOF COMES OUT OTHERWISE SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Stop defending cops when you literally have no idea what's going on.
I wouldn't want your dumb ass defending me, that's only going to make matters worse. It's people like you that are going to trigger the inevitable
Cop bounties we will start seeing. The blind faith in a racists institution is not a good look, piggy >

There is a police officer that was shot and the gun that did it was registered to the criminal. That is a fact!!
If you don't believe that simply because this is a case of cops shooting someone... and you hate cops... then you're a conspiracist who would have to believe that a cop grabbed the guy's gun... shot another cop with it... and planted the gun back on the guy who owned the gun... all for the purpose of being able to shoot the guy afterward!! 
Is that what you think happened? Are you a mentally deficient conspiracist who makes illogical shit up in their mind simply because you hate cops? >


There is a police officer that was shot and the gun that did it was registered to the criminal. That is a fact!!

It's not a fact. It's a claim made by the police. Don't use the word if you don't understand what it means