>

brah dont worry man pakistanis are far more efficient, strong, faithfull and dedicated in the mission of ruining their own nation than India can ever hope to be.
Something tells me the military is plotting a coup and this sabar rattling against India is his last ditch try to show strength against the military generals.
He is begging to imf for money and then says he will crush evil eyes. How is he going to feel or fuel the army in case of a war? >

I wish I had the confidence of Pakistan.
Their economy is in ruins. They are begging the IMF for another bailout.
They are almost at war with their allies the Afghan Taliban.
The TTP is carrying out attacks daily on Pakistani soil.
A third of this country was under water a few months ago.
They have massive Political instability with opposition leaders being jailed every week.
And yet ... And yet.... These idiots still cling to this fantasy of defeating and destroying India. Of breaking Kashmir away from India.
My man, please take care of your own country. You are almost a ruined nation that the world would like to forget about. You are in no position to go to war with India. Even with nuclear weapons.
Just fix your own problems for fuck's sake. >

Isn't it kinda the UKs fault? >

No it isn't even Mountbatten was against the partition and so was the INC, the two nation theory was rejected by the Muslim freedom fighters of the time as well, none of the members of the Muslim league were freedom fighters because guess what the Muslim freedom fighters were mostly in jail at the time when the Muslim league was peddling the idea of the two nation theory, it was a ploy to gain power and nothing more the proof for that is the fact that the Muslim league promised different things to different groups based on what they wanted to hear (if you asked them will Pakistan be secular they would say yes if you asked them would Pakistan be an Islamic state they would say yes and so on) because that was the only way to get the muslims of the subcontinent to vote in their favour. When people think how could 75% of the muslims in the subcontinent vote in favor of Pakistan (while only 66% went to Pakistan contrary to what many hindutva idiots think it wasn't 75% of the Muslim population in India but in British India where 66% went to Pakistan) the reason is because very soon people realised that the Muslim  league had no plan. >

Full stops and paragraphs, use it. It's much easier to read than a long wall of text, especially so for people reading on small mobile screens. >

Well it is a pain to do that when i am using swipe typing on phone to write a response and i am lazy. But yeah will keep that in mind going forward >

I though Pakistan had just reached out to India about improving relations >

In 1999, pakistan started a war just months after Indian and Pakistani prime ministers met and discussed bilateral talks for peace.
Here in India every kid knows never to trust a single thing coming out of Pakistani mouths. They will hug u with 1 hand and try to stab u with another >

Why aren't you posting this on a Russian website instead of Reddit?
The way I see it, India sided with Russia who started a war for conquest with a side of genocide and ethnic cleansing. ^(Nevermind what they did to their own with that insane draft.)
So, Pakistan talking back is just out of fear that you might plan the same for them.
Don't like that POV, do you? >

What on earth does Russia have to do with any of this? You realize the US and India did joint military drills literally 2 months ago....
The world doesn't just revolve around Russia and Ukraine. Fuck Russia and Fuck Putin, but get mad at China, Iran, and North Korea, who are providing material support to Russia.
Broaden your world view a bit, and the way you see it might just improve. >

Gotcha, so I wonder how all those weapons from Afghanistan are ending up in Indian controlled Kashmir and I wonder how those terrorist groups using them are funded.
It blows my mind we still support Pakistan after Bin Laden was found smack in the middle of
It… >

I mean the US knew about Pakistan harbouring terrorists long before Laden was found, heck during the kargil war there is an interview of Bill Clinton stating that Pakistan is harbouring and funding terrorists. What i don't understand is why then did they decide to give money to Pakistan to help them fight against terrorists when they knew before even starting that Pakistan was funding those same terrorists, heck the US also knew about Pakistan's strategic depth plan for Afghanistan before they started and yet they funded the country that was supplying their enemies, leave that aside using terrorists for asymmetric warfare was something that Pakistan started in the Muslim world in 1947 itself before the Mujahideen there was the lashkar used against India this was before Islamic militancy groups were even a thing in the Arab world, the Mujahideen against Soviet union was not the first time Islamic militants were used by the state to achieve some objectives, it was the Pakistani bandwagon that later other countries joined (Palestine is an exception to this there militancy is homegrown) and that is why i say that the most influential Muslim of the modern era is Zia ul haq as he was able to cause such havock that Islamic world still has not fully recovered. >

Wouldn't you prefer a good game of chess?