>

They're not taking a business.
They're taking control of jurisdiction the business operates in.
a bill introduced Monday, as the Republican governor punishes the company over its opposition to the so-called "Don't Say Gay" law.

This will be an interesting fight in court since corporations are legally people and thus have the right to free speech. >

What I want to know is how they will deal with breaking the original contracts and such. >

Seeing the Disney Army At Law deploy will be the most interesting part of this. >

So I’m old enough to remember the SCO lawsuits.  It was all fun and games until they decided to go after IBM.  Once the Nazgul got mounted up, it was game over. 
We all know Disney is a Law firm dressed as an entertainment company.   Let the FL legislation pass and see what happens next.  FA/FO on Disney+ will be a nice past time for the summer.
But the reality is it’s just a name change and new board members.  So mostly it’s another performance piece by Florida. >

DeSantis is hellbent on punishing Disney even if the whole state suffers for it. >

Yeah wasn't there something about how Florida would have to pay Disney an absurd amount of money if this went through? >

Reedy Creek is in debt to the county for a billion. If Florida takes it over they assume the debt. So it's costing at least a billion to do this. But, ya know, own the libs. >

Desantis changed the plan because of that.
Reedy Creek now remains exactly the same but instead of having its board members be appointed by Disney they are now appointed by the Governor.
Seems like a cool 'who can pay me the most bribes' kind of job. >

I don't understand how that helps solve that.  The gov can't just come in and take a business.