>

Also very fucking expensive.
Netanyahu said a lot of stuff.. >

We see a lot of "considering sending", "discussing sending" , "talking about sending" , and the like.  Instead, we should be seeing less talk and more delivering. >

The Iron Dome is a very tough sell for giving to Ukraine.  It's full of a lot of risks with very few rewards.  Even for Israel who use it, it's incredibly expensive.  When Palestine launches SCUD missiles at Israel, it costs about $20K per rocket sent.  To intercept them costs about $50K for rocket sent.  Every time Iran smuggles SCUDs into Palestine, it becomes a massive expense for Israel.
Russia is averaging using about 10,000 rockets a day.  Even if Israel provided enough Iron Domes to cover all of Ukraine's front lines... that would cost $500M/day to use.
The other problem is that this is the world's best anti-rocket system.  If it falls into Russian hands they can study it and make some improvements in their next gen rocket systems.
If they're doing considerations they probably want these things staged AWAY from the frontlines to protect civilians in places like Kyiv and Odessa. >


Russia is averaging using about 10,000 rockets a day.

What? Where on earth did you get that figure? >

he's probably including shellings, which of course the iron dome would not be used for >

Ah ok, that makes much more sense, thanks. >

Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m of the understanding that iron dome is meant to intercept slow moving rockets and wouldn’t be super effective against modern missile technology? >

It can take out grads, drones and mortars. It would be useful around Kyiv but not very substantially useful.