>

Maybe you think so, but no, we do not have this.
We had something closer to it 1940s-1970s, but even then we did not have what I am predicting.
What we have now is an economic oligarchy that has captured the economic system and is leveraging that overreach and attempting to overthrow the republic.
What we have now is a trampling of Article 4 by institutions that are substate actors established under Article 4. 
What we have now is a casino for rich people instead of a capitalist stock market.
What we have now is an unconstitutional system of anti-republican and anti-democratic corporate governance that violates Article 4.
What we have now is a tyrannical corporate system that is hoarding money and resources which they cannot effectively invest, spend or save.
That is not a free market. That is not capitalist competition. That is not an equitable distribution of money or wealth or resources. That is not a good faith bargaining framework. That is a distortion of market forces.
We have a kleptocracy. Organized crime.
I could go on.
Liberal capitalism.
I define this as a republican reform of the corporate system, with more, and meaningful, internal and external checks on corporate governance, and an emergence of more union-owned businesses and shareholder democracy.
This ideology will be the basis for public policies that will expand access to capital broadly, and create a broad-based middle class with a larger share of the wealth than the extreme oligarch minority.
The ideology also includes socialization of some economic sectors, like education, medicine, energy, and media. By "socialization" I really mean local, democratic control, and networked national cooperatives for standardization, best practices, and economy of scale. >

we already have this