
From now on, your task is to analyze a given text with the following steps:
Step 1: Determine where the reference appears in the article.
Step 2: Carefully read the text fragment to infer the overall topic and the author's main viewpoint.
Step 3: Identify the way references are used in the text, paying attention to tone and purpose.
Step 4: Compare the text with the given labels in the following categories:
- background: Check if the reference provides historical context or basic information about the topic.
- uses: Confirm if the reference is used to support an argument or provide examples.
- compares: Examine if the reference is used for comparison with other views or data.
- motivation: Analyze if the reference explains the motivation for studying this topic or conducting this research.
- continuation: Assess if the reference shows that current research builds upon past studies.
- future: Observe if the reference discusses future research directions or possibilities.
Step 5: Based on the analysis, integrate context, reference style, and label categorization to make a final label selection.
Remember to ensure that your selected motive accurately reflects the author's purpose for citing other research works.Your responses should be concise and specific, aligning with the given categories ('background', 'uses', 'compares', 'motivation', 'continuation', 'future') to capture the intent behind each citation.

EXAMPLE:
Text location: Discussion
Text: This is in keeping with the report of Blickstein et al,[3,15] which showed that the higher the combined twin birthweight the less likely it was to deliver discordant pairs.
Intent: result

Text location: METHODOLOGY
Text: We used an active contour algorithm [10] to segment the organs from 340 coronal slices over the two patients.
Intent: method

Text location: Introduction
Text: The drug also reduces catecholamine secretion, thereby reducing stress and leading to a modest (10-20%) reduction in heart rate and blood pressure, which may be particularly beneficial in patients with cardiovascular disease.(7) Unlike midazolam, dexmedetomidine does not affect the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide.
Intent: background

Text location: 
Text: For example, Kawato et al. (1990) suggested that movement trajectories can be projected using critical via-points through which the trajectory has to pass at a certain time, rather than in terms of the moment-by-moment dynamics of the implemented movement trajectory. Optimal trajectories can then be learnt by applying local optimising principles for getting from one via-point to the next. In this way, impoverished predictions can be used to monitor rich implementations. In the same way, language users might predict particularly crucial aspects of an utterance, but the aspects that they predict will depend on the circumstances. More generally, Meyer & Hagoort question the value of predicting one’s own utterance. They argue that prediction is useful when it is likely to differ from the actual event. This is the case when predicting another person’s behaviour or when the result of one’s action is uncertain (e.g., moving in a strong wind). But they argue that people are confident about their own speech. Meyer & Hagoort admit that they will tend to be less confident in dialogue, and we agree. But more important, we argue that the behaviour of the production implementer is not fully determined by the production command, because the complex processes involved in production are subject to internal (“neural”) noise or priming (i.e., influences that may not be a result of the production command). Assuming that these sources of noise do not necessarily affect forward modelling as well, predicted speech may differ from actual speech. In addition, prediction is useful even if the behaviour is fully predictable, because it allows the actor to plan future behaviour on the basis of the prediction. In fact, we made such a proposal in relation to the order of heavy and light phrases (see sect. 3.1, target article). Hartsuiker claims that our account incorrectly predicts an early competitor effect in Huettig and Hartsuiker (2010). His claim is based on the assumption that Response/Pickering & Garrod: An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Intent:
