105790
Philosopher Patrick Stokes has described the expression as problematic because it is often used to defend factually indefensible positions or to " [ imply ] an equal right to be heard on a matter in which only one of the two parties has the relevant expertise " .
 person: Patrick Stokes
Given options, please tell me the categories of all the listed entity words.Output format is "type1: word1; type2: word2". 
Option: media, plant, vehicle, astronomical object, time, disease, animal, location, person, organization, mythical figure, food, biology, geographical phenomenon, instrument, event 
Text: {0} 
 Entities: Patrick Stokes 
Answer:
 person: Patrick Stokes